A Heggstad petition can be a practical tool for transferring assets into a trust when a trustee discovers assets that were not properly retitled. This page explains how the process typically works in California, describes common reasons a petition is needed, and highlights practical steps our firm takes to help families resolve trust funding gaps. If you are managing a successor trustee role or administering a decedent’s affairs in El Cerrito Corona, it helps to understand what a Heggstad petition involves and how it may affect the probate and trust administration timeline.
When a trustmaker intended assets to be held in a trust but they remain titled elsewhere, a Heggstad petition asks a court to recognize those assets as trust property without a full probate administration. This option can reduce delay and expense compared with probate, particularly for modest estates or situations where the successors and beneficiaries agree on ownership. The petition focuses on establishing the trustmaker’s intent and showing documentation that ties the asset to the trust. Understanding how this tool interacts with other estate planning instruments helps trustees protect beneficiaries’ interests efficiently.
A Heggstad petition matters because it offers a streamlined path to ensure assets are administered according to the trustmaker’s intentions. Beneficiaries and trustees often prefer this path when title issues are clear and parties are cooperative, since it can avoid the full procedural burden of probate. The petition helps clarify ownership, enable asset transfer into the successor trustee’s control, and preserve the privacy of trust administration. In cases where the amount at issue is relatively modest, resolving property status through a Heggstad petition can preserve estate value and reduce legal and administrative delays for everyone involved.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists trustees and families throughout California with a range of trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. We focus on clear communication, thorough documentation review, and careful preparation of court filings when needed. Our approach emphasizes resolving title problems while minimizing cost and delay, coordinating with banks, county recorder offices, and beneficiary parties to provide practical solutions. Clients in Riverside County often value our willingness to explain options, gather necessary records, and pursue the path that best fits the family’s situation and the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is focused on proving that specific property should be treated as part of a trust based on the trustmaker’s documented intent. Common scenarios include real estate deeded in the decedent’s name alone, bank accounts not retitled to the trust, or assets transferred improperly at death. The petition asks a probate court to confirm the asset belongs to the trust so the trustee may manage or distribute it. Understanding the evidentiary requirements and the typical court timeline helps trustees decide whether a Heggstad petition is the best route.
Success with a Heggstad petition depends on records that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and the connection between the asset and the trust. Evidence can include the trust document, beneficiary designations, correspondence, financial statements, or other contemporaneous documentation. In many cases, parties reach agreement and the petition proceeds without contested litigation, but disputes can arise. Knowing how to collect suitable documentation and present a clear legal argument can greatly improve the odds of a smooth and timely judicial determination in favor of treating the asset as trust property.
A Heggstad petition is a specific type of court petition in California that seeks judicial recognition that property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust even though it was not properly titled. Named after a leading case, the petition allows a trustee to present evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances around the asset’s ownership. The court then determines whether the trust should be considered the rightful owner. This remedy aims to prevent unnecessary probate for assets that were clearly meant to be governed by the trust, preserving the trust’s intent and simplifying administration for beneficiaries.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves gathering essential documents and drafting a petition that explains why the asset belongs to the trust. Typical elements include the trust document, proof of the trustmaker’s death, asset documentation such as deeds or account statements, and any correspondence or declarations that support the trustmaker’s intent. The trustee must identify interested parties and provide proper notice per California rules. Filing the petition with the probate court starts a process that can include a hearing, submission of declarations, and a formal court order recognizing the asset as trust property if the judge is satisfied.
This section defines common terms used in Heggstad petitions and trust administration to help trustees and beneficiaries follow the process. Clear definitions of terms such as trustee, beneficiary, probate, transfer on death, and recorded deed will make it easier to assemble the necessary evidence and understand the court’s decision. Familiarity with these terms helps reduce confusion and supports better communication with banks, title companies, and courts. Keeping organized records and learning the legal vocabulary can make the petition process more efficient and less stressful for families.
A trust is a written legal arrangement in which a trustmaker transfers assets to a fiduciary called a trustee to hold and manage for named beneficiaries under specific terms. Trusts can streamline distribution at death, reduce court involvement, and provide ongoing management for beneficiaries. The trust document sets the trustee’s authority, conditions for distribution, and any special instructions. When property intended to be in a trust is not properly retitled, a Heggstad petition may be used to ask a court to recognize that the asset should be administered under the trust’s terms to honor the trustmaker’s intent.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request in California courts that asks the court to treat certain assets as if they had been properly transferred into a trust even though title was not changed. The petition presents evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent and the relationship between the asset and the trust. A favorable order allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust. This remedy helps avoid probate for assets that plainly belong to the trust, reducing time, cost, and public administration of the estate when circumstances support such a determination.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are titled in the decedent’s name and no valid trust covers them. Probate involves appointment of a personal representative, inventory of assets, payment of claims and taxes, and distribution to heirs or beneficiaries under a will or state law. A Heggstad petition aims to avoid probate for particular assets by showing they should instead be administered through the trust. Choosing the right approach can shorten timelines and reduce administrative expense compared to full probate proceedings.
A successor trustee is the person named in a trust to take over management and distribution of trust assets after the original trustee or trustmaker dies or becomes incapacitated. The successor trustee’s duties include locating trust assets, collecting documentation, communicating with beneficiaries, and ensuring distributions follow the trust’s terms. When assets are not properly titled to the trust, a successor trustee may petition the court through a Heggstad filing to have those assets recognized as trust property so they can be properly managed and distributed according to the trust document.
When an asset appears to belong to a trust but remains titled elsewhere, parties can consider a Heggstad petition, a limited probate, or other transfer procedures depending on the asset type and amount. A Heggstad petition focuses on judicial recognition of trust ownership for particular items, while probate handles the estate more broadly through administrator appointment and court oversight. For smaller assets, transfer on death designations, beneficiary forms, or affidavit procedures might suffice. Evaluating the time, cost, privacy, and potential disputes helps determine which legal option provides the best outcome for beneficiaries and trustees.
A limited approach such as a Heggstad petition or small estate affidavit may be sufficient when the asset value is modest and documentation clearly shows the trustmaker intended the property to be held in the trust. If the beneficiaries and the trustee are in agreement and the paperwork such as the trust document, account statements, or correspondence supports the claim, a simple court filing can resolve the issue quickly. This avoids the broader administration and public record of probate, preserves estate value, and expedites the transfer to the intended beneficiaries.
When interested parties cooperate and there are no credible disputes over ownership, the court can often resolve a Heggstad petition without protracted litigation. Agreement among beneficiaries and a clear chain of evidence reduce the need for adversarial proceedings. Trustees who can present comprehensive records, such as the trust, deeds, account statements, and relevant communications, are more likely to achieve a timely court order. This cooperative path minimizes expense and emotional strain on family members while ensuring assets are administered according to the trustmaker’s intent.
A more comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when ownership is disputed, records are ambiguous, or multiple parties assert conflicting rights. In those circumstances, the trustee may need to pursue fuller litigation, seek discovery, or defend against counterclaims, all of which require careful procedural planning. When title problems involve real property, complex financial instruments, or out-of-state assets, additional legal work can be required to assemble evidence, coordinate with title insurers, and prepare for contested hearings. These steps help protect beneficiaries’ interests where simple filings would not resolve underlying disputes.
If the estate includes significant or complex assets, such as multiple real properties, retirement accounts, business interests, or assets with unclear title histories, a more detailed legal strategy is often advisable. Comprehensive representation helps ensure that all relevant statutes, tax considerations, and creditor claims are addressed. Trustees may need careful coordination with accountants, appraisers, and financial institutions to properly value and transfer assets. Taking a thorough approach reduces the risk of later disputes or inadvertent compliance errors that could affect distributions and beneficiary rights.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust funding gaps provides clarity and protection for trustees and beneficiaries. It helps ensure that every relevant asset is identified, that title issues are addressed consistently, and that any potential claims are considered before final distributions. This can reduce the chance of future litigation, provide a clear paper trail, and support effective communication with beneficiaries. Taking time to evaluate tax implications, creditor rights, and documentation can ultimately save time and money by preventing mistakes that could lead to contested proceedings later.
Thorough handling of trust asset issues also promotes fairness and transparency among beneficiaries. It encourages documentation of the trustmaker’s intent and produces court orders or records that confirm ownership and distribution decisions. A deliberate process can protect trustees from personal liability by demonstrating reasonable steps taken to comply with legal duties. Beneficiaries gain confidence when they see careful recordkeeping and consistent legal reasoning supporting distributions, which often reduces friction and helps preserve family relationships after a loss.
A careful legal approach reduces the risk of future disputes by creating a clear record of decisions and the factual basis for those choices. When trustees document why assets were treated a certain way and obtain formal court recognition when appropriate, beneficiaries have confidence in the process and fewer grounds for challenge. Addressing potential creditor or tax issues up front and resolving title inconsistencies before final distributions prevents common sources of later litigation, saving estates from time-consuming and expensive contests that can drain assets and harm family relationships.
Comprehensive planning leads to efficient and secure asset transfer by ensuring all steps are taken to retitle property properly, obtain necessary court orders, and coordinate with financial institutions. This reduces administrative friction and the likelihood of accounts being frozen or title companies raising objections later. The result is a smoother transition of assets to their intended destinations under the trust, faster closure of the administration process, and greater protection for trustees who act prudently and with clear documentation supporting their decisions.
Start by collecting all relevant documents that show the connection between the asset and the trust. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that reflects the trustmaker’s intent. Organize records chronologically and create a summary that explains how the asset relates to the trust. Clear, well-organized evidence helps shorten the court review and supports a persuasive filing. It also helps banks or title companies that require documentation before they will process transfers or releases.
Evaluate whether filing a Heggstad petition is economically sensible compared to alternatives such as small estate procedures or direct transfers that do not require court action. For low-value assets with clear documentation, less formal methods may suffice. However, when ambiguity exists or financial institutions require court recognition, a Heggstad petition can protect the trustee and beneficiaries despite the filing costs. Weigh the legal costs, potential delays, and the value of formal court confirmation to choose the best path for your situation and the estate’s overall administration budget.
Consider a Heggstad petition when you are serving as successor trustee and discover assets that the trustmaker intended to be in the trust but which remain titled outside of it. This commonly occurs with real estate, retirement accounts, or bank accounts that were never retitled. A Heggstad petition provides a mechanism to obtain court recognition of the trust’s ownership so the trustee can administer or distribute the asset under the trust. Choosing this path can avoid the time and expense of full probate for those specific assets when the evidence supports trust ownership.
Another reason to consider this service is when a financial institution or county recorder requires a court order before transferring property to a trustee. Institutions may be cautious about releasing assets without clear legal authority, and a Heggstad petition offers the formal documentation they need. Similarly, when beneficiaries seek certainty or when title records are inconsistent with the trust documents, obtaining judicial confirmation helps prevent future challenges and clarifies the trustee’s authority to act on behalf of the trust and its beneficiaries.
Common circumstances include deeded real property still in the decedent’s name, bank accounts without trust designation, assets left in joint owner name with unclear intent, and paperwork that indicates the trustmaker intended the asset to be included but lacks a retitling step. Life changes, oversight during estate planning, or complex asset histories can all create the need for a judicial determination. Recognizing these patterns early helps trustees gather the necessary evidence and move forward in a way that protects beneficiary interests and streamlines administration.
One frequent issue is real property that was supposed to be held in a revocable living trust but remains deeded to the decedent. Deeds can be overlooked during initial trust funding, or title may not be updated after changes. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the property as part of the trust based on the trust document and supporting evidence. Resolving this issue allows the successor trustee to sell, transfer, or manage the property according to the trust without opening a full probate estate for that asset.
Financial accounts and investment holdings are often missed when funding a trust, leaving them in the decedent’s name. Banks and brokerage firms may refuse to transfer account ownership without a court order or clear documentation. A Heggstad petition can provide the court recognition needed to present to financial institutions. Gathering account statements, trust documents, and any prior beneficiary designations can support the petition and enable the trustee to take control of funds for distribution or management under the trust’s terms.
Sometimes paperwork suggests conflicting ownership or intent, such as a deed in one name and a trust document referencing the same property. These inconsistencies can arise from drafts, misfiled records, or partial updates to account registration. A Heggstad petition helps reconcile those conflicts by asking the court to examine the totality of evidence and make a determination. Properly documenting the chain of events and the trustmaker’s likely intent is essential to persuasively present the situation to the court and achieve clarity for administration.
We assist trustees and families in El Cerrito Corona and across Riverside County with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. Our office helps gather documentation, prepare court filings, coordinate with recorders and financial institutions, and communicate with beneficiaries. We focus on practical solutions that aim to reduce cost and delay while preserving the trustmaker’s intent. If you are facing title issues or uncertain asset status, contact our office at 408-528-2827 for an initial discussion about how a Heggstad petition might fit your circumstances.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for practical guidance on trust funding gaps because we emphasize clear communication, thorough preparation, and careful handling of court filings. We work to identify evidence that supports the trustmaker’s intent and prepare petitions that present a concise legal argument for court recognition. Our goal is to resolve title issues efficiently while keeping beneficiaries informed and minimizing unnecessary litigation. We also coordinate with banks, title companies, and the county recorder to facilitate transfers after court approval.
Our approach includes a detailed review of your trust documents and asset records, assistance with notifying interested parties, and preparation of the declarations and exhibits courts expect. We prioritize strategies that reduce delays and administrative costs while protecting trustee authority and beneficiary interests. Whether the matter appears straightforward or involves unclear records, we explain the likely outcomes and the steps needed to obtain a court order recognizing trust ownership when appropriate, helping clients make well-informed decisions throughout the process.
We also provide practical follow-up support once a court order is obtained, helping trustees present the order to financial institutions and recorders to finalize transfers. This hands-on assistance helps avoid repeated requests for additional documentation and streamlines the asset transfer process. For trustees handling multiple funding issues or complex asset types, having a dedicated legal partner helps ensure that each step is completed correctly and in a timely manner, giving beneficiaries a clearer path to distribution under the trust.
Our process begins with an intake review of the trust, asset records, and any supporting correspondence to assess whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then gather documentary evidence, prepare the petition and declarations, identify and notify interested parties, and file the matter with the probate court. We aim to keep the process focused and efficient, communicating expected timelines and next steps. If a hearing is required, we present a clear factual record and proposed order to help the court make a determination consistent with the trustmaker’s intentions.
The first step is a careful review of the trust document and relevant asset records to determine the strength of the evidence linking the asset to the trust. We collect deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence that reflects the trustmaker’s intent. This stage also includes identifying heirs and beneficiaries who must be notified. A detailed evidence package increases the likelihood of a straightforward court decision and reduces the need for contested proceedings by clarifying the factual basis for the petition from the outset.
We assist trustees in identifying assets that appear to belong to the trust but are improperly titled. This includes reviewing property records, bank and brokerage statements, and retirement plan documentation. Accurate identification prevents oversights that could lead to later disputes. We also create a summary exhibit that maps each asset to the supporting documents and explains why the trustmaker likely intended the asset to be included, which helps the court and interested parties quickly understand the basis for the petition.
Next, we collect declarations from the successor trustee and other witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent and the asset’s history. These declarations are accompanied by exhibits such as the trust document, account statements, deeds, and any written communications. Helping clients prepare clear, well-organized exhibits reduces back-and-forth with the court and opposing parties and strengthens the petition by showing a consistent factual narrative that supports treating the asset as trust property.
After assembling the file, we draft and file the Heggstad petition with the probate court and serve notice on interested parties per California law. Proper notice ensures that all interested parties have an opportunity to respond and that the court’s jurisdiction is clear. Service may include mailing, personal delivery, or publication if required. We track deadlines and respond to any requests for additional information. Timely, correct service and filing procedures reduce procedural risks that could delay resolution or require refiling.
We draft a petition that lays out the factual background, legal basis, and requested relief, along with a proposed judgment for the court’s consideration. The proposed order describes how the asset will be recognized as trust property and any instructions for transferring title or funds. A clear, persuasive petition and a well-drafted proposed order help the court act efficiently and make it easier for financial institutions and recorders to accept the court’s determination once entered.
Notifying all interested parties is a vital step to ensure the court has jurisdiction and to give beneficiaries an opportunity to object if necessary. We identify heirs, beneficiaries, and any known creditors, and serve them according to statutory rules. Proper service reduces the likelihood of challenges based on notice defects and keeps the record orderly. If parties agree, service can be quick; if not, we address disputes through motion practice or settlement discussions to move the matter forward toward resolution.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence, respond to any objections, and request that the judge enter an order recognizing the asset as trust property. Once the order is entered, we assist the successor trustee with presenting the order to financial institutions, the county recorder, or title companies to complete transfers or retitling. That final coordination is essential to ensure the court’s decision results in practical control and distribution of the asset according to the trust.
At any required hearing, we present the factual narrative, supporting declarations, and legal argument to the judge, and we address questions or objections raised by other parties. Preparation for hearing includes anticipating likely lines of challenge and ensuring the record is complete. Effective presentation reduces the chance of delay or remand. If objections remain, we seek to resolve them through evidence, negotiated agreements, or appropriate legal responses that preserve the trustee’s ability to move forward under the trust.
After the court enters an order recognizing ownership, we help implement the result by providing certified copies of the order to banks, recorders, or title companies and guiding trustees through any remaining administrative steps. This may include preparing instruments to retitle property or coordinating with financial institutions on account transfers. Completing these final steps ensures the asset flows into the trust for management or distribution, and it helps trustees wrap up administration in a way that is legally sound and preserves value for beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing in California that asks the probate court to recognize that certain property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust even though title was not formally changed before death. This petition is appropriate when the trustee has credible documents or other evidence showing the trustmaker intended the asset to be included in the trust. Rather than opening a full probate estate for that property, the petition seeks a judicial determination that places the asset under the control of the successor trustee for administration and distribution. You should consider filing a Heggstad petition when the value of the asset and the clarity of the evidence make the petition a reasonable method to achieve transfer, when financial institutions or recorders require court confirmation before transferring title, or when doing so will reduce time and expense compared with probate. If beneficiaries agree and records support the claim, the petition can be an effective way to honor the trustmaker’s intent and move assets into the trust for timely administration.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s calendar, the complexity of the factual record, and whether any parties oppose the petition. When records are straightforward and no significant objections arise, the process can be completed in a matter of a few months, allowing time for preparation, service, and a hearing or submission to the court. However, contested matters, additional discovery, or court scheduling delays can extend the timeline considerably, sometimes to six months or longer in busier jurisdictions. To keep the process efficient, it helps to prepare a comprehensive initial filing with clear exhibits and declarations, identify and notify all interested parties promptly, and be responsive to court requests for additional information. Early organization and cooperation among beneficiaries often shorten the timeline and reduce the chance of extensive litigation that prolongs resolution.
Courts consider a range of evidence to determine whether an asset should be treated as trust property. Key items include the trust document itself, contemporaneous deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, written communications showing the trustmaker’s intent, and declarations from witnesses or the successor trustee. The court evaluates the totality of evidence to decide whether the trustmaker intended the asset to be included in the trust and whether the trustee has shown a sufficient factual basis for recognition. Consistent documentary evidence and credible witness declarations are particularly persuasive. Bank statements that show payment or management from the trust, recorded deeds that reference the trust, or written instructions from the trustmaker can all strengthen the petition. The clearer the link between the asset and the trust, the more likely the court will enter an order recognizing trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific asset or assets at issue when the court recognizes those items as trust property. It is not a blanket substitute for probate in all circumstances; probate may still be needed for other assets titled solely in the decedent’s name that are not the subject of the petition. The petition targets particular property believed to belong to the trust and seeks judicial confirmation so the trustee can administrate or distribute it according to the trust’s terms. In some cases, a Heggstad petition is one component of broader estate administration, used to minimize the scope of probate or to transfer certain assets swiftly. If multiple assets are affected or disputes arise, additional proceedings may be required. Assessing each asset and the overall estate composition helps determine whether probate can be avoided or limited by pursuing Heggstad relief.
California law requires that interested parties be notified when a Heggstad petition is filed. This typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who would inherit under intestate succession, creditors when appropriate, and any parties with known interests in the asset. Proper service ensures the court has jurisdiction and gives those parties an opportunity to object. The method of notice depends on statutory requirements and the identities of the interested parties, and may include personal service, mail, or, in limited cases, publication. Identifying and serving all required parties correctly is crucial to avoid procedural defects that could delay or invalidate the proceeding. Trustees should work to identify potential interested parties early and retain proof of service to present to the court, reducing the chance of disputes based on notice irregularities.
Beneficiaries can oppose a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property, or if they contend the evidence does not support the trustee’s claim. Opposition can trigger a contested hearing, additional discovery, or settlement discussions. Courts will evaluate the objections in light of the documentation and testimony presented. If objections are based on factual disagreements, the trustee must be prepared to present declarations and exhibits that explain the trustmaker’s intent and the asset’s history. If opposition remains unresolved, the court will rule after hearing evidence. Often, parties resolve disputes through negotiation or by narrowing the scope of the petition. Preparing a thorough evidentiary record and engaging in constructive communication with beneficiaries can reduce the risk of prolonged litigation and help achieve a resolution that respects the trustmaker’s intent while addressing legitimate concerns.
Costs for a Heggstad petition include court filing fees, potential service costs, and attorney fees for preparation, filing, and any required hearing. The total expense varies based on complexity, whether objections arise, and the amount of time required to assemble records and respond to challenges. For straightforward matters with cooperative parties, costs tend to be lower. In contested matters, expenses increase due to additional briefing, discovery, and hearing preparation. When evaluating cost, consider the value of avoiding broader probate administration and the time saved for beneficiaries. In many cases, obtaining judicial recognition of trust ownership for a particular asset can be cost-effective compared with full probate. Trustees should weigh expected filing expenses against the potential administrative savings and the value of formal court confirmation.
If the asset is real property with liens or a mortgage, the trustee must address those encumbrances when seeking recognition through a Heggstad petition. A court order acknowledging trust ownership does not automatically remove liens or mortgage obligations. The trustee may need to coordinate with lenders, satisfy outstanding liens, or obtain title company guidance to determine steps for retitling the property. In some circumstances, lenders will require proof of authority to assume or refinance a mortgage before transferring title to the trust. Addressing encumbrances early in the process reduces the risk of surprises after the court issues an order. The trustee should gather mortgage statements, payoff letters, and title reports as part of the evidence package, and consider negotiating with lienholders where possible. Clear planning helps ensure the property can be effectively managed or transferred under the trust once the court acknowledges ownership.
Heggstad petitions are most commonly used for assets where title must be formally recognized by the court, such as real estate or certain accounts. Retirement accounts and life insurance proceeds usually transfer according to beneficiary designations, which often supersede the need for a Heggstad petition. However, if a retirement account or life insurance policy beneficiary designation is absent, ambiguous, or inconsistent with the trustmaker’s intent, a Heggstad petition may be part of the strategy to secure custody of proceeds or to clarify how a payout should be handled in coordination with the trust. Before pursuing a petition for these asset types, review account beneficiary forms, plan rules, and policy terms. Institutions handling retirement accounts and life insurance claims often have their own procedures and may require specific documentation or court orders. Understanding each asset’s transfer mechanics helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is necessary or if other administrative steps will suffice.
To get started if you believe a Heggstad petition is needed, begin by locating the trust document, any pertinent deeds or account statements, and correspondence that may support the trustmaker’s intent. Create a list of assets that appear to belong to the trust but remain titled elsewhere, and gather contact information for known beneficiaries and potential interested parties. Having a clear initial package of documents accelerates evaluation and helps counsel assess whether a petition is appropriate. Contact our office at 408-528-2827 for a preliminary discussion to review the records you have and outline next steps. We can help identify additional documents to obtain, advise on notice obligations, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and guide you through filing and court procedures so the matter moves forward with clarity and purpose.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas