A trust modification petition can address changes in family circumstances, tax law impacts, trustee issues, or unintended language in an original trust document. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in El Cerrito Corona and Riverside County who need careful review of their trust instruments and thoughtful preparation of court filings to request a modification. Whether you seek to add or remove beneficiaries, correct drafting errors, or adapt to significant life events, our approach focuses on clear communication, thorough documentation, and strategic planning tailored to the individual needs of each client.
Pursuing a trust modification involves both legal and practical considerations that affect family relationships and long term asset management. Our team takes time to understand the reasons behind requested changes, evaluates potential objections from other interested parties, and outlines the best course of action. We help clients by explaining the likely timeline, evidence required to support the petition, and possible outcomes the court may order. This scope of service prioritizes careful case preparation and client education so you can make informed decisions about trust changes in California.
A trust modification petition offers a legal path to update a trust when circumstances change after the original document was executed. Benefits include correcting drafting mistakes, accommodating changed family dynamics, addressing tax or asset planning needs, and clarifying trustee powers. Seeking a modification through the court preserves the trust’s integrity while allowing official amendments that reduce future disputes. Clients gain certainty about how assets will be managed or distributed going forward, clarity for successor trustees, and a formal record of the court approved changes which can help prevent later challenges or administrative confusion.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves individuals and families throughout California with particular attention to trust and estate matters. We are committed to thorough document review, careful legal analysis, and pragmatic advice. Our representation emphasizes clear communication during every stage of the modification process, from initial assessment and evidence gathering through to filing and hearings. We work closely with clients to outline realistic expectations, prepare persuasive pleadings, and, when possible, seek cooperative resolutions that reduce conflict and litigation costs for families in El Cerrito Corona and Riverside County.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to approve changes to an existing trust when the settlor can no longer or does not wish to modify it informally, or when court intervention is necessary to correct a defect. Common grounds for a petition include mistakes in drafting, changes in law or financial circumstances, or evidence that the settlor’s intent has shifted. The petition must present facts and supporting evidence showing why a modification is appropriate under California law, and the court then evaluates whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and overall fairness to interested parties.
Filing a trust modification petition typically requires identifying interested parties, preparing a clear statement of facts, and supporting the request with declarations and documentary evidence. Not all requests succeed; courts weigh the settlor’s intent, possible undue influence, and whether the modification respects the trust’s purpose. In many matters, negotiation and settlement with beneficiaries can resolve issues without a contested hearing. When litigation proceeds, careful preparation, credible evidence, and focused legal arguments increase the likelihood of achieving an outcome that honors the settlor’s intentions while protecting client interests.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to alter, reform, or clarify the terms of a trust. It is used when the trust’s language does not reflect the settlor’s actual intent, when changing circumstances make the original terms impractical, or when legal errors need correction to effectuate the settlor’s goals. The petition lays out factual and legal reasons for the requested change and may include extrinsic evidence, declarations, and proposed revised trust language. This process ensures any modification is documented and enforceable under California law rather than leaving uncertainties that could cause future disputes.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear description of the trust, the specific provisions to be reformed, factual support for why modification is necessary, and proposed revised language or directives for the court to adopt. Procedural steps usually involve notifying interested parties, filing the petition with the appropriate court, serving required documents, and either achieving resolution through settlement or presenting evidence at a hearing. Documentation such as the original trust instrument, communications reflecting the settlor’s intent, medical records if capacity is relevant, and financial statements may all be important to the court’s decision.
Understanding the terminology used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the legal process and participate in decision making. This glossary highlights common terms you will encounter, clarifies their meaning in the context of California trust law, and explains why those concepts matter during a petition. Familiarity with these terms supports clearer communication with counsel, aids in evidence collection, and reduces confusion about procedural requirements and potential outcomes in court proceedings.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a person transfers assets to be managed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to the terms set by the settlor. Trusts are often used for estate planning to control distribution, provide for minor beneficiaries, reduce probate, and manage assets during incapacity. Trust documents set out instructions for trustee powers, distribution schedules, and successor appointment. When modifications are needed, the court examines the trust’s terms alongside evidence of the settlor’s intent to determine whether and how changes should be made.
A petition to modify trust is a formal pleading filed in probate court requesting court authorization to amend the trust’s terms. The petition explains the requested changes, the factual basis supporting those changes, and the proposed legal modifications. Interested parties must be notified and have an opportunity to object. The court may require evidence such as declarations from witnesses or documents that demonstrate why the change reflects the settlor’s intent or is necessary to correct a defect. The court may approve, deny, or partially grant the requested modifications.
Settlor intent refers to the original purpose and wishes of the person who created the trust. When courts evaluate modification petitions, they seek to interpret and honor that intent using the trust language, surrounding circumstances, and admissible extrinsic evidence. Proving settlor intent can involve presenting prior drafts, correspondence, testimony from witnesses, or patterns of conduct that indicate what the settlor intended. The stronger and more consistent the evidence of intent, the more persuasive the petition will be in seeking a court ordered modification.
Interested parties include beneficiaries named in the trust, trustees, successor trustees, and sometimes other people or entities with a legal stake in the trust outcome. These parties must generally be notified of a petition to modify the trust and have the right to object or participate in settlement negotiations. Identifying and properly notifying all interested parties is an essential procedural step. Their responses and any objections they raise can influence whether the court approves the requested changes and may affect the terms of any final order.
When addressing issues with a trust, there are different legal paths depending on the scope of needed change. Some matters can be handled through a limited amendment or trustee action when the settlor is available and willing to sign new documents. Other situations require a petition to the court for reformation or modification, particularly when the settlor’s intent is disputed or the settlor cannot act. Evaluating which option fits involves considering the settlor’s status, the willingness of other parties to cooperate, and whether the change impacts beneficiary rights or tax consequences, making thoughtful assessment important at the outset.
If the settlor is mentally capable and agreeable to updating the trust terms, an informal amendment or execution of a new trust document can be the quickest and least adversarial solution. This path preserves privacy and avoids court involvement while ensuring the trust reflects current wishes. It is important to ensure the new documents are properly executed and that any successor trustees or beneficiaries are informed as appropriate. Properly drafted amendments reduce the risk of later challenges and make clear the settlor’s updated directives for asset management and distribution.
Limited changes that do not alter beneficiary entitlements or materially affect the trust’s purpose may be handled without court petitions if all affected parties consent. Examples include correcting typographical errors, updating administrative details, or clarifying ambiguous trustee powers when everyone agrees. These adjustments are typically faster and less expensive than court proceedings. However, when disagreements arise or when the settlor cannot act, a formal petition may be necessary to ensure the change is valid and enforceable under California law.
When the settlor lacks capacity or parties disagree about the meaning of trust provisions, filing a petition provides a formal process to resolve disputes and achieve a binding outcome. Court proceedings allow presentation of evidence, witness testimony, and legal argument to support the requested modification. This process is suited to situations where informal negotiation cannot resolve conflicts or where legal defects in the trust require judicial correction. While more time consuming, the court route creates an enforceable record that clarifies rights and responsibilities moving forward.
When trust changes involve complex tax consequences, multi jurisdictional assets, or significant shifts in estate planning strategy, comprehensive legal representation helps navigate statutory requirements and minimize unintended outcomes. Court supervised modifications can address legal defects and provide authoritative rulings that protect beneficiaries and trustees. Preparing a thorough petition with appropriate evidentiary support and legal rationale can prevent costly challenges later and ensure that changes are implemented in a way that aligns with both legal standards and the long term goals of the trust.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification prioritizes a full investigation of the trust document, transparent communication with interested parties, and careful court pleadings to secure enforceable changes. Benefits include a formal judicial determination that reduces uncertainty, the ability to admit extrinsic evidence where needed, and the resolution of competing claims in a single proceeding. This approach can be especially valuable when the requested change affects distribution rights, alters trustee powers, or corrects serious drafting errors that could otherwise lead to protracted disputes among heirs and fiduciaries.
Comprehensive representation also helps preserve family relationships by creating an organized process for notice and negotiation before contested hearings. When the court approves a modification, it provides clarity for trustees to administer assets according to the revised terms without fear of subsequent reversal. Comprehensive preparation reduces the risk of evidentiary issues, strengthens the credibility of the petition, and often results in outcomes that align more closely with what the settlor intended, while protecting the legal rights of beneficiaries and other stakeholders.
Securing a court order for a trust modification creates a formal, enforceable record that clarifies the modified terms and reduces the likelihood of future challenges. Judicial validation helps trustees act with greater confidence in administering assets according to the revised terms and can prevent later litigation over ambiguous provisions. This stability benefits beneficiaries and successor fiduciaries and supports orderly asset management and distribution in accordance with the court approved changes.
A comprehensive approach emphasizes collecting supporting documentation such as prior drafts, correspondence, medical records when capacity is an issue, and witness declarations to substantiate the requested change. This evidence helps the court determine the settlor’s intent and whether reformation is appropriate. Carefully gathered documentation can make the difference between a favorable result and an outcome that fails to reflect the true intent behind the trust, particularly when other parties contest the petition.
Collect and preserve all documents and communications that reflect the settlor’s intentions. Letters, emails, prior drafts of the trust, and notes from meetings can help demonstrate what the settlor intended when the original trust was created. Gather medical records if capacity is at issue and identify potential witnesses who can confirm the settlor’s statements or conduct. Well organized evidence presented with the petition improves the clarity of your position and supports a court requested modification, reducing the chance of contested litigation and helping achieve a result that aligns with the settlor’s true wishes.
Explore options for mediation or settlement discussions before initiating contested litigation. Alternative dispute resolution can provide a confidential forum to negotiate terms, preserve family relationships, and reduce legal costs. When parties reach a negotiated agreement, the court may be able to adopt the settlement terms through a stipulated order or agreed modification, limiting the need for a full contested hearing. A thoughtful approach to negotiation balances the desire for a prompt resolution with careful protection of legal rights and long term estate planning goals.
Individuals pursue trust modifications for many reasons, including changes in family composition such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths, errors or ambiguities in the trust document, changes in tax law, or the need to address a beneficiary’s incapacity. Other motivations include naming a new trustee, correcting unintended consequences of prior drafting, aligning the trust with evolving estate planning goals, and resolving disputes among beneficiaries. A petition can clarify administration procedures and create a reliable plan for handling assets under new circumstances.
Trust modification may also be appropriate when the original trust fails to account for newly acquired assets, relocations across state lines, or when a retirement plan or insurance arrangement requires coordination with the trust. In some cases, the trust language may produce outcomes that the settlor never intended, and court action is necessary to reform the document. Evaluating whether to proceed with a petition requires an assessment of the probable benefits, the likelihood of objections, and the potential impact on beneficiary expectations and fiduciary duties.
Circumstances that commonly require a petition include when beneficiaries dispute the trust terms, when a settlor’s capacity is called into question, when a provision is ambiguous or inconsistent, and when a trust contains drafting errors that prevent effective administration. Other triggers are changes in family status, remarriage, the need to remove or replace a trustee, significant changes to asset ownership, or newly discovered documents showing a different intent. Each scenario demands tailored legal analysis to determine if formal court modification is the most appropriate remedy.
Errors in the trust instrument, such as inconsistent distribution provisions, unclear trustee powers, or incorrect references, often require a judicial petition to correct and make the trust administrable. When the language of the trust produces unintended results or creates confusion about beneficiaries’ rights, a court ordered modification can resolve the ambiguity and restore alignment with the settlor’s likely intent. Collecting evidence that shows the drafting context and any drafts or correspondence can be essential to proving the need for reformation.
Major life events such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths may alter the fairness or practicality of the trust’s original terms. These changes can prompt beneficiaries or trustees to seek an adjustment so that asset distribution reflects current family relationships and financial realities. Addressing these shifts through the proper legal processes helps avoid confusion and provides a structured mechanism for updating the trust in a way that balances the settlor’s intent with present day circumstances.
When questions arise about the settlor’s capacity at the time the trust was created or when evidence suggests a mistake influenced the trust’s provisions, interested parties may file a petition to reform or void parts of the document. These matters require careful factual proof, including medical records, witness testimony, and contemporaneous communications. Successfully resolving capacity or mistake issues through the court provides authoritative direction for trustees and beneficiaries about how the trust should be administered going forward.
We provide hands on guidance to clients in El Cerrito Corona and surrounding Riverside County communities seeking trust modifications. Our team assists with document review, evidence gathering, petition drafting, and court filings. We strive to explain the process in straightforward terms, outline possible timelines, and assess likely outcomes based on the facts at hand. Clients can expect thorough preparation for settlement discussions or hearings, clear communication about procedural requirements, and practical recommendations for moving forward with confidence.
Our firm focuses on providing comprehensive legal support for trust related matters, including petitions to modify or reform trust documents. We prioritize clear communication, careful preparation of pleadings, and attention to evidentiary detail so that clients understand each step of the process. We work to identify potential objections early, evaluate settlement possibilities, and prepare persuasive documentation when court intervention is necessary. This approach aims to secure practical outcomes that honor the settlor’s intent and protect the rights of beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
Clients benefit from a methodical process that begins with a thorough review of existing trust instruments, identification of relevant legal issues, and strategic planning tailored to the family’s situation. We guide clients through notice requirements, evidence gathering, and the preparation of declarations and supporting exhibits. Whether seeking to resolve disputes through negotiation or presenting matters to the court, our practice emphasizes careful case management to reduce delay and expense while protecting client interests throughout the proceeding.
Throughout the representation, our goal is to provide practical legal counsel and advocacy that helps clients achieve durable resolutions. We explain the range of possible results and help clients make informed decisions about settlement options, court filings, and evidentiary strategies. For families in El Cerrito Corona facing trust modification issues, our firm offers responsive support designed to reduce uncertainty and move cases forward in a way that aligns with the client’s objectives for estate planning and asset management.
Our process begins with an initial consultation to assess the trust document, the reasons for modification, and any likely objections from interested parties. We advise on evidence to gather, discuss potential procedural routes, and outline a step by step plan for filing a petition or pursuing alternative resolution. From document drafting to court filings and hearings, we manage procedural deadlines and coordination with other professionals. Our aim is to provide reliable guidance and organized representation so clients can move forward with confidence.
The first step is a careful review of the trust instrument and related documents to determine whether a petition is warranted and what evidence will support a modification. This includes examining prior drafts, beneficiary communications, and any records relevant to the settlor’s intent or capacity. We evaluate potential legal theories, identify interested parties to notify, and advise on the likelihood of consent versus contested litigation. A clear assessment at this stage helps set realistic expectations for timeframes, cost, and probable outcomes.
During the initial consultation we collect key documents and identify witnesses whose testimony may be helpful. We discuss what evidence will likely be persuasive to the court and outline next steps for obtaining necessary records. This phase often includes assembling medical records if capacity is in question, locating prior trust drafts, and organizing financial statements or correspondence that clarify the settlor’s intent. Early organization of evidence helps streamline the drafting of the petition and strengthens the overall presentation to the court.
We identify and notify all required interested parties, explaining the proposed change and the legal basis for the petition. Clear communication at this point can encourage cooperation or at least prepare other parties for the possibility of court filings. Proper notice also preserves procedural rights and helps prevent delays caused by inadequate service. When parties are informed early, there may be opportunities for negotiation or settlement that can reduce the time and expense of litigation.
Once the necessary evidence is collected and interested parties are identified, we prepare a carefully drafted petition that sets forth the facts, legal arguments, and proposed order for the court. The filing includes supporting declarations and documentary exhibits that substantiate the requested modification. Attention to procedural rules and clear organization of exhibits and declarations increases the petition’s clarity and the court’s ability to evaluate the requested changes efficiently.
Supporting declarations should present a coherent narrative that ties the documentary evidence to the legal grounds for modification. Exhibits may include prior trust drafts, correspondence, financial records, and medical reports. These materials must be properly authenticated and organized to be admissible and persuasive. Presenting a concise, well documented record reduces the risk of evidentiary disputes and helps the court reach a decision that reflects the factual circumstances surrounding the requested change.
After the petition and supporting materials are prepared, we file them with the appropriate probate court and serve copies on all interested parties in accordance with statutory requirements. Proper filing includes paying required fees, scheduling required hearings, and ensuring that proof of service is timely completed. Maintaining accurate records of filings and service is essential to protect procedural rights and to establish the timeline for any contested proceedings or settlement negotiations.
Following filing, parties may attempt settlement or the court may schedule a hearing to consider objections and evidence. At the hearing, the court reviews declarations, documentary exhibits, and any witness testimony to determine whether modification is warranted. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order detailing the approved changes. That order becomes part of the trust record and guides trustees in administering assets under the revised terms. Post order steps may include revising trust administration documents and updating beneficiary instructions.
Many matters are resolved through negotiation before a contested hearing, resulting in stipulated orders or settlement agreements that the court can adopt. Negotiated outcomes can preserve relationships, limit legal costs, and provide tailored solutions that address the concerns of multiple parties. When settlement is feasible, we facilitate productive discussions, propose compromise language, and draft formal agreements for court approval so the resolution becomes enforceable and reduces the risk of future litigation.
If settlement is not reached, the court hearing provides an opportunity to present the factual record and legal arguments supporting the modification. The judge evaluates the evidence and issues an order granting or denying the petition in whole or in part. A court issued order clarifies the trust’s terms and provides a reliable basis for trustee actions going forward. After a final order, trustees and beneficiaries implement the changes and update trust administration procedures consistent with the court’s directives.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court asking the judge to change, reform, or clarify the terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is not possible or when legal defects exist. The petition outlines the specific provisions to be modified, the factual basis for the change, and the proposed language the court should adopt. Interested parties are notified and have the opportunity to object. The court evaluates whether the change aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether reformation is appropriate under applicable California law. Anyone with a legal interest in the trust’s administration or a legitimate claim that a modification is necessary may initiate a petition, often trustees, beneficiaries, or personal representatives acting on behalf of the settlor’s estate. When the settlor is alive but lacks capacity, a guardian or fiduciary may seek relief on their behalf. The court will consider standing and whether the party filing the petition has shown sufficient factual support to justify judicial intervention rather than informal amendment.
The duration of a trust modification matter varies depending on case complexity, the degree of opposition from interested parties, and court scheduling. Simple matters with cooperation from beneficiaries can be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months if there is agreement and required notices are completed. Contested matters that require substantial evidence, witness testimony, or multiple hearings will generally take longer, potentially many months to a year or more depending on the court’s calendar and the need for discovery or expert reports. Early preparation, organized evidence, and attempts at negotiation can reduce overall time. Promptly identifying interested parties, preparing declarations and exhibits, and taking steps to address likely objections may avoid delays. However, when disputes are substantial, litigation timelines are governed by procedural requirements and court availability, so clients should plan for a potentially extended process and weigh the benefits of seeking a negotiated resolution versus pursuing a full contested hearing.
Supporting a petition typically requires documentary and testimonial evidence that helps prove either the settlor’s intent or the existence of a mistake or drafting defect. Useful materials include prior drafts of the trust, correspondence or notes indicating the settlor’s wishes, financial records showing intended distributions, and medical records if capacity is relevant. Declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s statements or actions at the time the trust was prepared may also be persuasive, as can testimony from professionals involved in the trust’s drafting or administration. Properly authenticated exhibits and credible witness declarations help the court understand the context in which the trust was created and why the amendment is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. Organizing evidence clearly and explaining how each piece supports the legal argument enhances the petition’s persuasiveness. When capacity or undue influence is alleged, medical and other objective records become especially important to the court’s assessment.
Yes. Beneficiaries and other interested parties have the right to object to a proposed modification and to be heard by the court. The petition process requires notice to these parties, giving them an opportunity to file objections, present evidence, and argue why the trust should remain unchanged. Objections might be based on allegations that the modification is inconsistent with the settlor’s intent, that the settlor lacked capacity, or that there was undue influence at the time changes were proposed or documents were executed. When objections arise, parties often engage in negotiations to reach a settlement that all can accept, which can be presented to the court for approval. If settlement is not possible, the court will evaluate the evidence at a hearing and make a determination. The existence of objections affects strategy and may require more extensive evidence gathering to address contested factual issues.
No. A court petition is not always required. If the settlor is available and willing to execute an amendment, or when all interested parties consent to a change and the trust documents allow for amendment without court involvement, the trust can often be updated without filing a petition. Informal amendments, restatements, or execution of a new trust are common solutions when capacity and consent are present. These options preserve privacy and typically involve lower costs and faster resolution than a court process. However, a petition becomes necessary when the settlor cannot act, when there is reason to believe the original trust does not reflect the settlor’s true intent, or when parties disagree and judicial clarification is needed to produce an enforceable outcome. In those cases, the court provides a binding resolution that protects trustees and beneficiaries from future disputes regarding administration under the trust.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary based on complexity, required evidence, the extent of opposition, and time spent in negotiation or litigation. Simple, uncontested matters that proceed by agreement require fewer attorney hours and lower filing fees, while contested matters can be more expensive due to additional discovery, hearings, and trial preparation. Court filing fees and costs for obtaining records or expert reports may also add to overall expense. Estimating costs early helps clients plan and decide whether to pursue settlement or litigation. During the initial consultation we provide an estimate based on the matter’s complexity and potential procedural needs. We discuss options for limiting costs such as targeted evidence collection, focused motions, or mediation. Transparent communication about likely fees and possible outcomes helps clients make informed choices about proceeding with a petition versus exploring alternative approaches to achieve the desired trust changes.
If the court denies a petition to modify a trust, the trust remains in its original form and trustees must continue to administer assets according to the unmodified terms. Parties who are dissatisfied with the decision may have options to appeal, although appeals are subject to strict procedural rules and timelines. Alternatively, the parties may revisit negotiation or mediation to seek a mutually acceptable solution that can be implemented without further court action, if the underlying issues are amenable to compromise. Denying a petition also highlights the importance of thorough evidence gathering and clear legal argument to support modification requests. If a petition is denied due to insufficient proof or procedural defects, it may be possible to correct those deficiencies and refile, though clients should evaluate whether additional filings would be cost effective and likely to produce a different outcome given the facts and prior court ruling.
A trustee has powers defined by the trust instrument and by law, but generally cannot unilaterally change material distribution provisions that affect beneficiaries’ rights unless the trust expressly grants that authority. Trustees can take administrative actions necessary to manage assets, invest appropriately, and carry out the trust’s terms, but modifying beneficiaries’ entitlements, altering dispositive provisions, or correcting substantive drafting errors typically requires either settlor consent or court approval through a petition. Trustees must act within the scope of their fiduciary duties and follow legal procedures when disputes arise. If a trustee believes modification is necessary for proper administration, the trustee may petition the court for guidance or authorization. This process ensures changes are made under judicial oversight and protects both the trustee and beneficiaries by providing a legally enforceable outcome. Trustees should seek legal direction before taking any action that could be interpreted as changing the substance of the trust.
Trust modifications can have implications for estate tax planning, depending on the nature of the changes and the overall estate plan. Altering beneficiary designations, changing funding mechanisms, or modifying provisions related to marital or generation skipping tax exemptions may affect tax treatment. Before pursuing significant modifications, it is important to evaluate possible tax consequences and coordinate changes with the broader estate planning strategy to avoid unintended tax outcomes that could reduce the estate’s value or shift liabilities among beneficiaries. When tax issues are potentially implicated, careful planning and consultation with tax knowledgeable counsel or advisors can help structure modifications to achieve intended goals while minimizing adverse tax consequences. The court will focus on whether the modification reflects the settlor’s intent and is legally appropriate, while the client should also confirm that the modified terms align with tax planning objectives and the overall financial strategy for the estate.
To begin the process, gather the trust document and any related records such as prior drafts, correspondence with the drafter, financial records, and relevant medical documentation if capacity is a concern. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule an initial consultation to review the materials and discuss the reasons for modification. During this evaluation we will identify interested parties, assess the strength of available evidence, and recommend the most appropriate course of action, whether that be an informal amendment, a negotiated agreement, or a court petition. After assessing the facts, we outline the steps needed to proceed, including evidence collection, draft petition preparation, and required notices. We will provide an estimate of likely timelines and costs, and explain procedural requirements for filing with the probate court. Taking these early steps helps organize the case and positions you for the most effective path to achieving the desired trust changes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas