A Heggstad petition can resolve issues when assets meant to be in a trust are left in an individual name after a trustmaker’s death. Residents of Home Gardens and surrounding areas often encounter administrative roadblocks when transfer paperwork is incomplete or property titles remain unchanged. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists families with clear, practical steps to place trust assets where they belong without unnecessary delay. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition is, how it can help reunite assets with a revocable living trust, and what to expect during the court process in Riverside County.
Many families discover after a trustmaker’s passing that certain accounts or pieces of property never transferred into the living trust. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that those assets were intended to be trust property and to direct their transfer accordingly. For Home Gardens residents, pursuing this process can preserve estate plan intentions and avoid broader probate complications. This page outlines the legal concepts, common scenarios that trigger a Heggstad petition, the firm’s approach to handling these matters, and practical tips for gathering documents and moving the case forward efficiently in California courts.
Filing a Heggstad petition provides a focused pathway to correct the legal record when assets intended for a trust remain titled improperly. The primary benefit is restoring the trustmaker’s original intent by placing assets under the governance of the trust, which helps ensure beneficiaries receive what was planned. For families, that means minimizing disputes, avoiding broad probate proceedings, and resolving title or account issues without upending other aspects of the estate plan. The petition process also produces a court order that clarifies ownership, which can be relied upon by banks, county recorders, and other institutions to complete transfers smoothly.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on helping families in California navigate trust administration, estate plan implementation, and post-death trust issues like Heggstad petitions. Our team uses practical, case-focused strategies to gather necessary documentation, prepare court filings, and communicate with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions. We emphasize clear client communication and individualized planning to honor the trustmaker’s intent while reducing delay and conflict. Residents in Home Gardens and Riverside County can expect hands-on support during every stage of the petition process, including coordination with title companies, financial institutions, and the probate court as needed.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to a California court to declare that certain property owned in an individual name was actually intended to be trust property. This remedy arises when assets were not properly transferred into a revocable living trust before the trustmaker’s death, often due to oversight or incomplete administrative steps. The court evaluates evidence such as the trust document, transfer forms, beneficiary designations, and related communications to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. Understanding the standards and evidence requirements is essential for preparing a persuasive petition and avoiding unnecessary litigation.
Not every title discrepancy requires a Heggstad petition, and sometimes simpler administrative fixes are available. However, when financial institutions or county recorders demand a court order or when other heirs contest the status of assets, a petition becomes the practical route to secure clear ownership. The process typically involves filing pleadings in the appropriate probate court, serving interested parties, submitting evidence supporting the trustmaker’s intent, and requesting an order that directs transfer of the asset into the trust. For Home Gardens families, local court practices and timelines can shape how quickly the matter is resolved.
At its core, a Heggstad petition asks the court to adjudicate that identified property was intended to be part of the trust, despite remaining in a different form of title. The remedy recognizes the trustmaker’s clear written plan and seeks to align public records with that plan. Evidence commonly used includes the trust agreement, deeds, account agreements, beneficiary designations, and testimony from trustees or family members. The court’s order then provides the legal authority for transferring title, updating account ownership, and ensuring that trust administration proceeds according to the trust’s terms without the need for full probate proceedings.
A successful Heggstad petition rests on showing intent, documentation, and a link between the mis-titled asset and the trust agreement. Typical steps include gathering the trust document and supporting records, drafting a petition that explains the discrepancy and the reasons for recognizing the asset as trust property, serving interested parties, and presenting the evidence to the court. The process may also involve working with title companies or banks to update records after a court order is entered. Clear organization of documents and a careful presentation of facts increase the likelihood of a favorable and timely result.
Understanding the terminology used in trust and Heggstad petition matters helps families follow the process and participate effectively. Terms to know include trustmaker, trustee, beneficiary, title, deed, beneficiary designation, probate, and trust administration. Each of these terms relates to the roles, documents, or procedures involved when assets must be transferred into a trust. Knowing what each term means and how it applies to the situation can make it easier to collect the right records, answer court questions, and communicate with banks or county recorders who will implement the court’s order after a successful petition.
The trustmaker is the person who created the trust and set the terms for how assets should be handled at death or incapacity. The trustee is the person or institution given authority under the trust to manage assets and carry out the trustmaker’s directions. In Heggstad matters, demonstrating the trustmaker’s clear intent through the trust document and related records is central to the petition. The trustee may be the party filing the petition to correct title or may support another party’s petition if that aligns with the trust’s goals and the orderly administration of the estate.
Title and deed documents establish who is recognized in public records as the owner of real property. When an asset is meant to be controlled by a trust but remains titled to an individual, the mismatch can prevent trustees from managing or distributing the property. A Heggstad petition can correct that mismatch by asking the court to recognize that the property belongs to the trust under the trustmaker’s plan. Banks and county recorders typically rely on court orders to update titles and deeds after the court has determined the proper ownership status for trust administration.
Many financial accounts transfer according to beneficiary designations or payable-on-death instructions rather than trust ownership documents. When account titling or beneficiary forms conflict with a trust document, the dispute may need legal clarification. The Heggstad petition addresses situations where the overall estate plan and trust indicate that the asset should be managed or distributed by the trust. Clear records of beneficiary forms, account statements, and the trust’s provisions help the court determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property for purposes of administration and distribution.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering assets when a person dies without a trust, or when certain assets are subject to probate rules. Trust administration is a private process governed by the trust document and typically avoids probate. A Heggstad petition supports trust administration by moving mis-titled assets into the trust so they can be managed outside probate. Understanding the distinction helps families appreciate why correcting title to align with the trust can save time and expense and preserve the privacy of beneficiaries by minimizing probate involvement.
When assets are mis-titled after a trustmaker’s death, several paths can be considered. Administrative fixes can work when institutions accept affidavits or transfer forms; a Heggstad petition is appropriate when a court order is necessary to clarify ownership; and probate may be required if the trust cannot cover certain assets or if disputes cannot be resolved otherwise. The best choice depends on the type of asset, the willingness of institutions to cooperate, and whether interested parties contest the transfer. For many Home Gardens families, a Heggstad petition balances accuracy and efficiency when administrative routes are insufficient.
Some banks, brokerages, or county departments will accept straightforward documentation to move an asset into a trust, such as a transfer-on-death form, a deed prepared for signature, or an affidavit confirming the trustmaker’s intent. When institutions agree to these administrative steps and no interested party objects, the matter can be resolved without court involvement. Gathering accurate records, confirming procedural requirements with the institution, and preparing properly executed documents can often accomplish the desired transfer more quickly and with less expense than filing a petition.
If the trust document and surrounding paperwork clearly show the trustmaker intended the asset to belong to the trust, and all parties agree, a limited administrative approach is often adequate. This may involve submitting the trust and related forms directly to the financial institution or county recorder with a cover letter explaining the situation. When institutions accept that documentation at face value, the asset can be transferred without involving the probate court. However, when institutions refuse or when disputes are raised, a Heggstad petition becomes necessary to obtain a binding court order.
When title is clouded, deeds are outdated, or financial institutions decline to act without a court order, a full legal approach becomes necessary. Handling these matters requires preparing persuasive court filings, compiling historical documents, and coordinating with third parties such as title companies. Legal representation ensures that the petition frames the evidence properly and meets procedural requirements of the probate court. For families facing administrative obstacles in Riverside County, a comprehensive approach helps move the case toward resolution while protecting beneficiary rights and the integrity of the estate plan.
When beneficiaries disagree about whether an asset should belong to the trust, or when third parties assert competing claims, legal representation helps navigate the conflict. The court may need detailed evidence and legal argument to determine what the trustmaker intended and how the asset should be handled. A comprehensive legal process involves discovery, careful document preparation, and advocacy in court to obtain a clear ruling. This approach seeks to prevent prolonged litigation and to secure a definitive order that allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition reduces uncertainty and increases the likelihood of a timely court order that reflects the trustmaker’s intent. By assembling complete documentary evidence, addressing potential objections in advance, and coordinating with institutions that hold the assets, the process becomes more efficient. Families benefit from clearer communication, fewer delays when title transfers are finally executed, and a stable legal foundation for trust administration. This method also helps avoid inadvertent procedural errors that could cause unnecessary setbacks in the probate court.
Additionally, handling a petition comprehensively preserves the privacy and continuity advantages of trust administration by limiting the need for full probate proceedings. The court’s order resolving the title issue allows trustees to manage and distribute property under the trust’s terms rather than through probate. For Home Gardens residents who want to honor estate planning decisions while minimizing public exposure and administrative burdens, a well-managed petition offers a practical route to correct records and move forward with confidence.
A thorough Heggstad petition helps create a definitive court record that clarifies ownership, which can deter future disputes among heirs. With a clear judicial ruling and properly updated records, beneficiaries and trustees gain assurance about how assets should be handled. This clarity reduces the odds of later challenges that could increase costs and delay distributions. By addressing potential conflicts proactively and documenting the trustmaker’s intent carefully, families protect the estate plan’s goals and provide a stable path for the trustee to manage assets and complete distributions.
Once a court enters an order recognizing assets as trust property, banks and recorders are typically willing to complete transfers based on that order. A comprehensive approach ensures the court’s decision is clear and tailored to practical needs, which helps institutions process changes efficiently. This reduces the administrative burden on trustees and family members, meaning titles can be updated, accounts retitled, and distributions made without repetitive follow-up. Practical coordination after the order speeds final resolution and lets the trustee focus on carrying out the trust’s terms for beneficiaries.
Begin by collecting the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and any correspondence related to transfers. Early documentation reduces delays and helps the petition present a clear narrative that links the mis-titled asset to the trustmaker’s plan. Keep originals or certified copies when possible, and make a checklist of institutions and records that may be involved. Organized records also make it easier to identify any administrative fixes that might work without court involvement and speed any necessary communication with banks or county recorders later in the process.
Open communication with beneficiaries, trustees, and family members can reduce conflict and streamline the petition process. Explain the purpose of the petition and share key documents when appropriate to build consensus. When parties understand that the petition aims to honor the trustmaker’s plan and avoid probate complications, objections are less likely. If disputes are foreseeable, early discussion may narrow issues and reduce the time the court needs to resolve contested matters. Clear, documented communication supports a cooperative route to correct trust-related title matters.
When assets remain in an individual’s name after death, the trust’s plan can be frustrated and beneficiaries may be delayed or prevented from receiving intended benefits. A Heggstad petition restores the legal alignment between the trust document and ownership records, which helps trustees carry out the trustmaker’s instructions. Home Gardens residents who want to preserve the privacy and efficiency advantages of trust administration rather than shift assets into public probate will find this remedy particularly useful. It offers a targeted solution without reopening broader estate questions that the trust already addresses.
Considering this service also helps prevent future disputes and reduces administrative backlog during estate settlement. When title matters are addressed through a court order recognizing trust ownership, banks and recorders can implement transfers more readily. This minimizes follow-up and confusion and allows trustees to proceed with distributions or ongoing management without repeated document requests. If local institutions require judicial clarification or if family members contest asset status, pursuing a Heggstad petition offers a formal, predictable way to resolve the matter and move forward with trust administration.
Common triggers for Heggstad petitions include recently deceased trustmakers whose real property deeds were never recorded in trust name, bank or brokerage accounts that remain in individual names, retirement accounts with unclear beneficiary designations, and assets transferred by mistake to the wrong title. Other scenarios include transfers handled informally without completing recording steps, or clerical errors that left properties out of the trust’s control. Identifying these circumstances early allows trustees to gather supporting evidence and decide whether an administrative fix or a petition is the appropriate solution.
Homeowners sometimes assume that a deed transfer occurred during lifetime planning or that the trust automatically encompassed title, only to discover that the county records still show individual ownership. When real estate remains outside the trust, the trustee may lack authority to sell or manage the property according to the trust terms. A Heggstad petition allows the court to declare that the property was intended to be trust property and to direct the county recorder to accept an appropriate deed reflecting trust ownership after the court’s order is entered.
Financial accounts often remain titled to an individual when transfers were overlooked or beneficiary designations were not completed. Institutions may refuse to transfer account ownership to a trustee without a court order, preventing access for payment of debts or distribution to beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition explains the trustmaker’s intent, presents documentation such as account statements and the trust agreement, and requests a judicial finding that the account belongs to the trust so the trustee can manage or distribute funds in line with the trust terms.
Sometimes paperwork contains inconsistencies, or signature and recording errors create confusion over ownership. Clerical mistakes on deeds or account titles can block routine trust administration steps. A Heggstad petition clarifies the legal effect of related documents and asks the court to recognize the trustmaker’s intent despite those errors. The petition process allows the court to evaluate the totality of documents and testimonies and to issue an order that resolves the discrepancy, enabling trustees to proceed with confidence in managing and distributing estate assets.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves Home Gardens and nearby Riverside County communities with focused assistance on trust-related issues such as Heggstad petitions. We combine thorough document review, practical courtroom experience, and direct communication with institutions to resolve title and account discrepancies. Our approach emphasizes reducing delays and working toward orderly resolutions that reflect the trustmaker’s wishes. Residents can expect assistance drafting petitions, assembling evidence, coordinating with county recorders and banks, and guiding trustees through the steps required to transfer assets into the trust.
Choosing legal representation for a Heggstad petition means working with professionals who understand the procedural and evidentiary requirements of probate courts and the practical needs of institutions that hold assets. Our team focuses on clear case preparation, timely filings, and careful coordination with title companies and financial institutions to ensure the court’s order result can be implemented without undue delay. For Home Gardens families, having a locally knowledgeable attorney helps address county-specific practices and expedites resolution where possible.
We prioritize client communication, providing regular updates and guidance on expected timelines and document needs. That helps trustees and beneficiaries know what to expect at each stage of the petition process. Addressing potential objections in advance, preparing supporting affidavits or declarations, and aligning the petition with institutional requirements reduces the risk of repeated court appearances or additional filings. Families appreciate a methodical approach that seeks practical solutions while protecting the trustmaker’s intent and the rights of beneficiaries.
Our office also assists with steps that follow a favorable court order, ensuring titles are updated and banks or recorders receive the necessary documents to complete transfers. That post-order follow-through is essential to finalize trust administration and avoid lingering administrative tasks. By coordinating the legal and practical actions required after a court decision, we strive to bring closure to the matter so trustees can manage or distribute assets in accordance with the trust without facing further procedural obstacles.
Our process begins with an initial consultation to identify the assets at issue, review the trust document, and assess supporting records. We then recommend the most efficient path, whether an administrative fix or a Heggstad petition, and outline expected steps and timelines. If a petition is needed, we draft pleadings, gather declarations and documentary evidence, and handle service of process. We maintain communication with the client throughout and coordinate with banks and recorders to implement the court’s order once obtained, streamlining the transition of assets into the trust.
The first step involves assessing whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate by reviewing the trust, deeds, account statements, and beneficiary forms. We identify which assets require transfer and gather supporting documents that show the trustmaker’s intent. That phase also includes contacting relevant institutions to understand their evidentiary requirements. Early document collection and careful preparation reduce the likelihood of additional requests from the court and speed the process, ensuring the petition thoroughly demonstrates the connection between the asset and the trust.
We compile an inventory of all assets that appear to belong to the trust but remain titled in an individual name. This includes real property, bank and brokerage accounts, retirement accounts, and other valuables. Creating a clear inventory helps prioritize which assets need immediate attention and determines whether a single petition can address multiple items or if separate actions are necessary. Accurate inventorying also allows trustees to gather appropriate supporting documents and plan for potential administrative or court-based steps.
Gathering the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any communications that illustrate the trustmaker’s intent is essential. We also obtain declarations from trustees or family members familiar with planning discussions when appropriate. Those records form the backbone of the petition and assist the court in reaching a clear conclusion. Well-organized evidence reduces the chance of follow-up requests and helps the court to issue a focused order that institutions can rely on when executing transfers.
After collecting records, we draft the petition and supporting declarations to present a clear narrative linking the asset to the trust. The filing includes detailed exhibits, a proposed order for the court, and any necessary notices to interested parties. We also ensure service is completed according to court rules. Clear, precise drafting anticipates common objections and frames the issues to facilitate a straightforward judicial determination, saving time and expense compared to broader probate litigation.
Preparation involves assembling the petition, declarations, and documentary exhibits that show the trustmaker’s intent and the discrepancies in title. Each exhibit is labeled and described so the court can easily review the evidence. A well-prepared filing helps the judge quickly understand the facts and legal basis for the requested order. This attention to detail reduces the risk of the court requesting additional information and helps move the petition toward a resolution that institutions can act upon.
Service of the petition on beneficiaries, heirs, and potential claimants gives them notice and an opportunity to respond. We handle formal service and respond to any objections by presenting clarifying evidence or legal argument. If disputes arise, we aim to resolve them through negotiation when possible. When litigation becomes necessary, focused advocacy in court seeks a definitive ruling that protects the trustmaker’s intent and permits the trustee to proceed with administration once the matter is resolved.
Following the court’s determination, we assist clients with implementing the order, which often involves providing certified copies to banks, recorders, and title companies. We coordinate the technical steps required to transfer title, retitle accounts, or record corrected deeds. Finalizing these administrative actions is essential to complete trust administration and allow trustees to manage or distribute assets in accordance with the trust. Our role includes follow-through to ensure the court’s remedy has the intended practical effect.
After the court issues an order, we obtain certified copies and deliver them to the institutions holding the affected assets. Providing the correct forms and certified documents helps banks and recorders process transfers efficiently. We also prepare any deeds or transfer forms required to reflect trust ownership in public records. This coordination reduces the trustee’s administrative burden and ensures that the court’s decision results in the practical step of moving the asset into the trust’s name or otherwise placing it under the trustee’s control as intended by the trust.
We follow up with banks and the county recorder to confirm that titles and accounts have been updated according to the court’s order. Verifying that changes are completed prevents future confusion and ensures trustees can manage and distribute assets without further administrative obstacles. If additional documentation is requested, we assist with prompt responses. Final confirmation closes the loop on the petition and helps trustees move forward with implementing distributions and ongoing trust administration responsibilities.
A Heggstad petition is a court request under California law asking a probate court to recognize that certain property was intended to be part of a revocable living trust even though the property remains titled in an individual’s name. The petition presents documents and sworn statements demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent and the relationship between the mis-titled asset and the trust agreement. It is necessary when institutions or recorders require judicial clarification to retitle property and when administrative remedies are insufficient to resolve title discrepancies. The petition process involves filing paperwork in probate court, serving interested parties, and presenting supporting evidence such as the trust document, deeds, account statements, and declarations. If the court finds the trustmaker intended the asset to be trust property, it enters an order that allows trustees and institutions to complete the transfer. The exact steps and level of evidence needed vary based on the asset type and the local court’s practices, so careful preparation of documentation is important.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Riverside County depends on the court’s calendar, the complexity of the evidence, and whether interested parties contest the petition. In uncontested matters with complete documentation, the process can often be resolved in a few months, including time for filing, service, and scheduling of a hearing. When disputes arise or additional evidence is needed, the process may take longer. Local procedural requirements and court backlog also influence the overall duration of the matter. Proactively organizing documents, communicating with potential respondents, and addressing likely objections can help streamline the process. Working with counsel who understands local practice helps anticipate required filings and supports an efficient presentation at the hearing. After the court’s order, additional administrative steps with banks and recorders complete the transfer, which can add time depending on the institutions’ procedures.
Many trustmakers can prevent the need for a Heggstad petition by ensuring assets are properly titled in the trust’s name during their lifetime and by updating beneficiary designations that might otherwise conflict with trust terms. Regular review of the estate plan, deed recordings, and account titles helps identify and correct issues before they become post-death problems. Proactive estate administration and routine checks after any life changes can reduce the risk that important assets will remain outside the trust. Despite careful planning, clerical errors, oversight, or new assets acquired late in life can lead to situations where assets remain individually titled. In those cases, a Heggstad petition provides a corrective mechanism. Having organized estate documents and a clear inventory of assets prepared in advance makes it easier to demonstrate intent and avoid disputes if a petition becomes necessary.
A Heggstad petition itself does not function as a full probate proceeding; instead, it is a targeted court action to determine the ownership status of specific assets relative to a trust. The petition seeks a judicial declaration that identified property should be treated as trust property, enabling transfer into the trust outside the broader probate process. In that way, it supports trust administration and helps avoid bringing all assets into probate. However, if the court finds competing claims or the context requires broader estate resolution, some matters may touch on probate issues. The goal of a Heggstad petition is to keep the administration focused and private where possible by aligning title records with the trustmaker’s plan, rather than subjecting the entire estate to probate supervision.
Courts consider several types of evidence when evaluating a Heggstad petition, including the trust agreement itself, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and any written communications or draft transfer documents that indicate the trustmaker’s intent. Declarations from trustees, family members, or others with knowledge of planning discussions can support the narrative that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. The overall goal is to show a clear link between the asset and the trustmaker’s plan. Clarity, consistency, and contemporaneous documentation strengthen the petition. The court evaluates whether the evidence reliably demonstrates that the asset was intended to be trust property. Gaps or conflicting documents may require additional explanation or testimony, which underlines the importance of thorough preparation and organization when pursuing the petition.
Most banks and title companies will accept a court order that clearly directs the transfer of property into a trust, but institutional policies differ on the specific documents required to implement the order. Some entities require certified copies of the court order along with specific forms or affidavits before processing a transfer. Understanding and meeting these requirements ensures the court’s decision translates into actual title changes and account retitling. Before filing a petition, it is helpful to confirm institutional requirements so the petition and proposed order address those needs directly. Coordinating post-order implementation with institutions prevents delays. If a particular bank or title company resists, the court’s explicit directives generally provide the authority needed to compel compliance and finalize the transfer.
Common objections include competing claims to ownership, disputes over the trustmaker’s intent, or challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence. Respondents may argue that the asset was gifted outside the trust, that beneficiary designations control, or that the documentation does not clearly establish the trustmaker’s plan. Addressing these objections involves presenting clear documentary evidence, credible declarations, and legal argument that ties the facts to the legal standard for recognizing trust ownership. Anticipating likely objections and preparing responses in advance helps shorten litigation and resolve disputes more efficiently. In some cases, negotiation or mediation among interested parties can narrow contested issues before a hearing. When necessary, the court will weigh conflicting evidence and determine whether the petition should be granted based on the totality of the record and applicable law.
Yes, multiple assets can often be included in a single Heggstad petition if the assets are linked to the same trust and the factual basis for each asset’s inclusion is similar. Grouping assets into one petition can be efficient, reducing filing fees and streamlining court proceedings. The petition must identify each asset, provide supporting exhibits, and explain the trustmaker’s intent as to each item. Proper organization and labeling of exhibits are essential for the court to assess each asset individually within the single filing. However, when assets involve different issues, jurisdictions, or institutional requirements, separate petitions may be needed. Evaluating whether to combine items or file separately depends on the type of property, the institutions involved, and potential disputes. Counsel can advise on the most practical strategy for addressing multiple assets while minimizing cost and delay.
Costs of a Heggstad petition include court filing fees, fees for serving notice, and legal fees for preparing the petition and supporting declarations. Additional expenses may arise if discovery or court hearings become necessary due to disputes. The total cost varies with complexity, the number of assets involved, and whether the matter is contested. When compared to a full probate proceeding, a focused petition often represents a more cost-effective path to correct title and enable trust administration. Proactive document gathering and early communication with institutions and interested parties can reduce the time spent preparing the petition and lower overall expenses. Discussing fee structures and likely costs with counsel at the outset helps families plan and budget for the process. In many cases, the long-term savings from avoiding probate and resolving title issues promptly justify the initial investment in the petition process.
Beneficiaries can support a Heggstad petition by helping collect relevant documents, such as deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that shows the trustmaker’s intentions. Providing clear timelines about when transfers were requested or drafts of transfer documents can strengthen the case. Beneficiaries may also provide declarations explaining their understanding of the trustmaker’s plan, which can be persuasive when coupled with documentary evidence. Open communication among beneficiaries, trustees, and counsel also helps reduce the likelihood of contested litigation. When parties cooperate and supply organized records, the petition can proceed more smoothly. Beneficiaries who take an active role in assembling evidence and staying informed about procedures help the trustee present a clear case to the court and facilitate a timely resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas