A Heggstad petition is a legal method used in California to have property recognized as owned by a trust when the decedent intended the asset to be held in trust but formal transfer was not completed before death. If you live in Lakeland Village or elsewhere in Riverside County and are managing a trust administration, this process can help clear title and align property ownership with the settlor’s plan. Our firm explains how the petition works, what documentation is needed, and how the court evaluates whether property should be treated as trust property. Understanding that process can save time and reduce conflict among beneficiaries.
Navigating a Heggstad petition involves gathering evidence that the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust and that transfer steps were initiated but remained incomplete. Common evidence includes trust documents, beneficiary allocations, correspondence, drafts of deeds, and actions taken by the decedent toward moving the property into the trust. In Riverside County courts, judges review this evidence to determine intent and whether equitable relief is appropriate. For families in Lakeland Village, pursuing a Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate, finalize trust administration, and ensure assets are distributed according to the trust terms rather than intestacy rules.
A Heggstad petition can be a decisive tool when a decedent intended to fund a trust but failed to complete legal formalities. The primary benefit is the court’s ability to recognize property as trust assets without full retroactive deed transfer, which helps avoid probate and aligns title with the settlor’s intentions. It can resolve disputes among heirs, clarify ownership for third parties like banks or title companies, and expedite asset distribution. For estate administrators and trustees in Lakeland Village, pursuing this remedy can reduce administrative delay and legal uncertainty, promoting a smoother transition for beneficiaries and preserving estate plan integrity.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration guidance across California, including services for Heggstad petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful documentation, clear communication with family members and trustees, and strategic filing in the appropriate county court. We help clients assemble the factual record the judge will review and prepare pleadings that focus on intention and equitable remedies. Clients from Lakeland Village and San Jose alike receive straightforward counsel about options, timelines, and likely outcomes. Our team works to minimize conflict and expense while advocating for a resolution consistent with the decedent’s documented wishes and the trust instrument.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that specific property should be treated as trust property despite incomplete legal transfer. The court examines whether the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust, whether there was a substantial step toward transfer, and whether treating the asset as trust property would be equitable. Evidence may include the trust document, draft deeds, communications with title companies, and trustee actions. Filing such a petition typically requires preparation of declarations, supporting attachments, and formal notices to interested parties. The proceeding aims to correct an administrative omission rather than to re-write estate plans.
In deciding a Heggstad petition, judges evaluate the totality of circumstances to determine if the settlor’s intent is clear and whether equitable relief is appropriate. The court’s determination can effectuate corrective relief that treats the property as if it had been transferred to the trust before death. While the process is often faster and less costly than full probate, it still requires careful legal work to gather admissible evidence and prepare persuasive arguments. For trustees and beneficiaries in Lakeland Village, understanding timelines, documentary needs, and potential objections helps set realistic expectations about the petition’s prospects and anticipated court involvement.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial remedy that allows a court to treat certain assets as trust property when assets were intended to be transferred into the trust but were not formally conveyed before death. It is grounded in equitable principles and focuses on the decedent’s intent and steps taken toward transfer. The remedy is commonly used for real property where a deed was never executed or recorded, or for accounts and other assets where title does not reflect the trust despite clear planning documents. The petition clarifies title, protects beneficiaries’ interests, and prevents unintended probate administration.
Courts typically look for proof of intent, acts toward transfer, and fairness when evaluating a Heggstad petition. Proof of intent can come from the trust instrument, wills, correspondence, or declarations the settlor made. Acts toward transfer may include drafting or signing a deed, submitting paperwork to a financial institution, or taking steps to retitle an asset. The court also considers potential prejudice to third parties and whether recognizing trust ownership would create inequity. Preparing a petition involves assembling documentation, drafting declarations from witnesses, and serving interested persons so the court has a complete factual record for decision-making.
Understanding specialized terms helps trustees and family members follow the process. Terms such as settlor, trust instrument, title, deed, probate court, and trustee arise frequently in Heggstad matters. Each carries legal significance: the settlor is the person who created the trust, the trust instrument states the settlor’s intentions, and title denotes legal ownership. A Heggstad petition often interacts with probate procedures and may require coordination with title companies. Familiarity with these concepts allows clients to gather correct documents and communicate effectively about next steps with counsel and the court.
The settlor is the individual who created the trust and transferred assets into it or intended to do so. In Heggstad petition matters, the settlor’s intent is central: the court examines evidence of what the settlor intended regarding ownership and disposition of specific assets. Documents such as the trust agreement, wills that reference the trust, and communications from the settlor can support an intention to transfer property into the trust. Establishing the settlor’s demonstrated intent helps the court determine whether to recognize property as trust-owned despite a failure to complete formal transfer steps.
Title refers to legal ownership of an asset, while a deed is the instrument used to transfer ownership of real property. In Heggstad petitions, issues often arise when title or deed records do not match the trust instrument because the settlor intended to move real estate into the trust but did not execute or record the deed. The court reviews any drafts, signed but unrecorded deeds, or other documentary evidence indicating the settlor took steps to effectuate the transfer. Resolving title discrepancies allows the trust’s terms to be carried out as intended.
Probate court is the judicial venue where matters related to estates and trusts are adjudicated, including Heggstad petitions. When a petition is filed, the probate division reviews the factual record and legal arguments to determine whether equitable recognition of trust ownership is appropriate. The court ensures notice is given to interested parties and evaluates potential impacts on creditors or other claimants. A successful Heggstad petition results in an order clarifying ownership without the need for a full probate administration, when the court finds the decedent’s intent and actions support such relief.
The trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust and outlines the settlor’s distribution plan and asset management rules. It establishes who the trustee and beneficiaries are and specifies how assets should be handled. In Heggstad petition cases, the trust instrument is a primary piece of evidence of the settlor’s intent to have certain property treated as trust property. Clear provisions in the trust combined with corroborating actions toward transfer often persuade the court that recognizing the property as part of the trust aligns with the settlor’s expressed plan.
When title does not reflect trust ownership, there are several pathways to resolution. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the property as trust-owned based on intent and acts toward transfer. Probate administration addresses assets that pass under a will or by intestacy, which may be longer and costlier. Quiet title actions or corrective deeds may be appropriate in some circumstances, particularly if third-party interests complicate matters. Choosing the best path depends on the strength of documentary evidence, potential claims from creditors or heirs, and the desired speed and cost of resolution. An informed choice balances legal risk and family priorities.
A limited corrective approach may succeed when the trust instrument and supporting documents clearly show intent and the required conveyance steps were nearly complete. Examples include signed but unrecorded deeds, correspondence indicating the settlor intended to move property into the trust, or bank paperwork showing efforts to retitle accounts. When evidence is straightforward and no interested party objects, filing a targeted petition or preparing a corrective deed can resolve the issue quickly. This path avoids prolonged litigation and focuses on aligning recorded title with the trust’s terms, which benefits trustees and beneficiaries seeking prompt administration.
When no competing claims exist and title can be corrected without affecting third-party rights, a limited filing or administrative correction may be appropriate. If creditors, lienholders, or other claimants are not implicated, and the trust’s documentation is persuasive, courts or title companies may accept corrective documents that clarify ownership. This reduces time and expense compared with contested proceedings. However, if any party has a legitimate dispute about ownership, a Heggstad petition provides formal judicial resolution. Evaluating the presence of competing interests is therefore an essential early step.
Comprehensive legal service is often needed when evidence of the settlor’s intent is ambiguous or when family members dispute property status. In such situations, preparing a Heggstad petition requires careful collection of affidavits, witness statements, and documentary proof that persuasively establish intent and actions toward transfer. The court process can involve opposition from heirs or third parties, making legal advocacy and procedural knowledge important for obtaining a favorable ruling. Full-service representation helps ensure the petition is presented effectively and that filings comply with local court rules and evidentiary standards.
When multiple assets are at issue or title defects are complex, a more thorough legal strategy is necessary. Issues such as jointly held property, mortgages, liens, or conflicting beneficiary designations can increase the complexity of a Heggstad petition. Coordinating with title companies, mortgage servicers, and other stakeholders often requires formal pleadings and negotiations. Comprehensive legal assistance ensures that each asset is properly analyzed, the correct remedy is pursued for each situation, and all legal and procedural steps are handled to protect trustees and beneficiaries from unexpected liabilities or delays.
A comprehensive approach reduces the risk of overlooking evidence, missing procedural requirements, or facing unexpected challenges from third parties. By conducting a full review of all relevant documents and potential claims, counsel can present a persuasive and well-supported petition that addresses likely objections in advance. This preparation can shorten overall timelines by preventing delays created by incomplete filings or discovery disputes. Families in Lakeland Village benefit when the process minimizes uncertainty and maximizes the chance that property will be recognized as trust-owned in a way that honors the settlor’s plan.
A thorough approach also helps manage ancillary issues such as tax reporting, creditor notices, and coordination with title companies after an order is obtained. Properly preparing for post-order tasks ensures the trust can take control of assets without further court involvement where possible. This reduces administrative burden on trustees, lowers the risk of subsequent challenges, and provides a cleaner chain of title for future transactions. A considered strategy addresses both the immediate petition and the practical steps needed to implement the court’s order efficiently.
Thorough preparation reduces the likelihood of protracted disputes by addressing probable objections and collecting corroborative evidence before filing. When judges receive a complete record showing the settlor’s intent and actions toward transfer, they are better positioned to grant relief confidently. This clarity benefits trustees and beneficiaries by producing a definitive court order that clarifies ownership and reduces future litigation risk. The result is an efficient administration that focuses on honoring the settlor’s wishes and closing estate affairs in a timely manner.
A comprehensive strategy ensures that once the court issues an order, steps to correct title, update account ownership, and notify institutions proceed without unexpected complications. Coordinating with title companies and financial institutions in advance reduces the chance of additional requests for documentation and repetitive work. This forward planning helps trustees close accounts, sell or refinance property if needed, and provide beneficiaries with a clear record of actions taken. Ultimately, careful planning makes the transition from court order to practical control of assets more efficient and predictable.
Gathering complete documentation is the foundation of a successful Heggstad petition. Look for drafts of deeds, signed but unrecorded instruments, correspondence with title companies, bank forms showing beneficiary designations or account retitling, and any notes or letters indicating the settlor’s intent to place property into the trust. Declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s actions or heard statements about intent can strengthen the record. Having organized, dated, and legible copies of relevant materials reduces the time needed to prepare the petition and increases the likelihood that the court will recognize the property as trust-owned.
Engaging title companies, mortgage servicers, and financial institutions early can surface any procedural or documentation requirements they may impose after a court order is obtained. Some companies have specific forms, affidavits, or proof-of-order requirements before they will update records or insure corrected title. Understanding those requirements in advance permits strategic preparation of the petition and supporting documents to meet post-order needs. This coordination reduces back-and-forth once the court issues relief and helps trustees implement the order promptly for the benefit of beneficiaries.
Consider a Heggstad petition when property that should belong to a trust remains in the decedent’s name due to incomplete conveyance steps. Common triggers include signed deeds that were never recorded, bank accounts not retitled, or real property that was intended to be transferred but administrative steps were left unfinished. Filing a petition can prevent assets from entering probate and helps ensure the trust’s distribution plan is followed. For trustees managing estate administration in Lakeland Village, pursuing this remedy can provide clarity on title, protect beneficiaries’ interests, and reduce administrative burdens related to estate settlement.
You should also consider a petition when third parties, such as title companies or mortgage servicers, require a court order to accept corrected ownership, or when family members disagree about whether transfer steps were completed. A judicial determination can settle disputes, provide a clear order for institutions to follow, and offer legal certainty that supports final distribution. If the asset in question is significant or part of a complex portfolio, the formal court process may be the most efficient and reliable way to ensure the settlor’s intentions govern the disposition of property.
Situations that commonly lead to Heggstad petitions include unrecorded deeds, bank accounts left in the decedent’s name, or title transfers that were started but not completed. Other circumstances include last-minute estate plan changes that were not fully implemented, failure to obtain signatures from co-owners, or mistakes in paperwork that prevented successful retitling. When these gaps surface during trust administration, trustees may need a judicial order to align recorded ownership with the trust’s terms. Identifying and documenting the cause of the failure to transfer helps frame the legal argument for petitioning the court.
Unrecorded or incomplete deeds are a frequent reason for filing a Heggstad petition. The settlor may have executed a deed to place property in a trust but never recorded it, or a deed may have remained in draft form awaiting final steps. When the decedent dies, title records do not reflect the trust ownership, creating an inconsistency between the trust instrument and public records. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the intended transfer and correct the title, relying on evidence of the settlor’s intent and any steps taken toward completion prior to death.
Financial accounts that were meant to be retitled to a trust but remain in the decedent’s personal name can complicate trust administration. Banks sometimes require a judicial order to accept a trustee’s direction when account title does not reflect trust ownership. Showing attempts to retitle accounts, such as completed forms or communications with the financial institution, strengthens a petition by demonstrating the settlor’s intention and actions toward funding the trust. Addressing these accounts through a Heggstad petition can facilitate transfer and avoid probate processes that would otherwise control those assets.
Conflicting records, last-minute changes to estate plans, or informal documents that indicate a settlor’s intent may create uncertainty about ownership at death. When records are inconsistent or incomplete, interested parties may dispute whether an asset was meant to be in the trust. A Heggstad petition enables the court to weigh the available evidence and determine whether the property should be treated as part of the trust. By seeking judicial clarification, trustees can obtain an authoritative resolution that helps complete administration and reduces the potential for ongoing conflict among beneficiaries.
If you are managing a trust in Lakeland Village and encounter assets that were not properly transferred, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with evaluating options and preparing a Heggstad petition when appropriate. We help trustees collect supporting evidence, draft declarations, and submit pleadings in the correct county court. Our process includes explaining the necessary documentation, serving notices to interested parties, and coordinating with title companies or financial institutions after an order issues. Call our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and learn about next steps to align title with the trust’s terms.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition requires careful factual development and adherence to court procedures. Legal guidance helps ensure that all relevant evidence is discovered, properly documented, and presented persuasively to the probate court. Attorneys assist with drafting the petition, preparing witness declarations, and ensuring service and filing comply with local rules. This process reduces the chance of avoidable delays and increases the likelihood that the court will issue an order recognizing trust ownership. Professional help also supports trustees in meeting fiduciary duties while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Effective representation includes collaboration with title companies and institutions to anticipate post-order document requirements and minimize administrative friction. Counsel can advise on potential creditor issues, coordinate title updates, and manage communications that reduce family conflict. Legal counsel also helps evaluate alternative routes, comparing the costs and benefits of a Heggstad petition versus other remedies such as probate or quiet title actions. This strategic perspective allows trustees to select the path most likely to achieve clear ownership while conserving estate resources and time.
When disputes arise, representation supports robust advocacy in court while seeking pragmatic resolutions where possible. Attorneys can negotiate with opposing parties to narrow disputes, propose stipulated orders, and present a focused evidentiary record aimed at securing the relief needed to honor the settlor’s plan. For trustees and family members in Lakeland Village, experienced legal guidance helps balance legal advocacy with sensitivity to family dynamics, striving for outcomes that finalize administration and preserve relationships where feasible.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the asset or assets in question and to collect all relevant documents that show the settlor’s intent and steps toward transfer. We review trust instruments, deeds, correspondence, and any drafts or completed forms related to account retitling. After evaluating the evidence, we advise whether a Heggstad petition or another remedy is most appropriate, prepare the necessary pleadings, and coordinate service to interested parties. We also assist with post-order tasks such as coordinating with title companies to effectuate corrected records so the trust can administer or distribute assets as intended.
The first step involves a careful review of the trust, wills, deeds, account records, and any correspondence or drafts that indicate the settlor’s intent. We identify which assets lack proper title and gather supporting documentation such as signed but unrecorded deeds, bank forms, and witness statements. This fact development stage is essential to determine whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed or if a different remedy is more appropriate. Clear organization of documents reduces delay and allows for targeted pleadings that address the court’s likely concerns.
We analyze the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and any contemporaneous writings to establish the settlor’s intent. This review includes cross-checking beneficiary designations, wills that reference the trust, and any other documents that corroborate a plan to transfer the asset. Understanding these documents enables us to craft legal arguments that link the decedent’s expressed wishes to specific property, forming the backbone of a persuasive petition to the probate court. Gathering clear documentary evidence is a critical early phase of the process.
We gather evidence showing efforts to transfer assets into the trust, including draft deeds, communications with title companies, signed forms from financial institutions, and declarations from witnesses. This evidence demonstrates that steps were taken toward funding the trust, even if the formal transfer was not completed. Presenting a complete record of these actions helps the court assess whether treating the property as trust-owned is appropriate. Careful documentation of these efforts strengthens the factual basis for the petition and supports equitable relief.
After assembling the evidence, we draft the petition and supporting declarations tailored to local probate court rules. The filing includes a clear statement of facts, exhibits proving the settlor’s intent and acts toward transfer, and requests for the specific relief sought. We ensure that notice requirements are met for beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties, and we file documents in the appropriate county. The goal at this stage is to present a concise and well-supported petition that allows the court to evaluate the claim efficiently.
Drafting declarations from trustees, witnesses, and professionals who observed or assisted with attempted transfers is essential. Exhibits such as copies of the trust, deeds, drafts, and correspondence are organized and referenced in the petition. Clear, chronological presentation of facts and exhibits helps the judge understand the sequence of events and the settlor’s intent. Well-prepared declarations also address potential defenses by explaining why the failure to record or retitle occurred and demonstrating equitable grounds for relief.
Proper service of notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and any creditors is required to proceed. After filing, interested parties may respond or object, and it is common to receive inquiries from title companies or lenders. We handle communications, respond to objections with additional evidence or briefing, and attempt to negotiate stipulations when possible. Preparing for and addressing potential objections promptly helps the court move toward a resolution and can avoid unnecessary hearings when parties agree on the underlying facts.
If the court grants the petition, it issues an order recognizing the property as trust-owned. The final stage involves implementing the court’s order by recording any required documents, updating account titles, and coordinating with title companies, financial institutions, and lienholders to reflect the change. We assist trustees in executing these post-order tasks and ensuring that transfers are completed in line with the court’s directions. Effective follow-through prevents future disputes and completes the administration of the trust property.
After obtaining a favorable order, it may be necessary to record the court’s order or a corrective deed to create a public record of the change in ownership. We coordinate with county recorder offices and title companies to ensure that the order is accepted and reflected in title records. Properly recording the order or corrective instrument establishes a clear chain of title for future transactions and provides assurance to buyers, lenders, and beneficiaries that the trust’s ownership has been legally recognized.
Once title is clarified, we help facilitate account retitlings, beneficiary distributions, and other administrative tasks required to implement the trust’s directives. This may involve working with banks, brokerage firms, and retirement plan administrators to provide the court order and any required affidavits. We also advise trustees on tax reporting considerations and document retention to support the final accounting. Completing these steps ensures that the trust gains control of its assets and can carry out distributions consistent with the settlor’s intent.
A Heggstad petition is a court proceeding in which a petitioner asks the probate court to treat property as belonging to a trust when the decedent intended the transfer but failed to complete the formalities. Courts examine the trust document, any drafts or signed deeds, and other evidence demonstrating intent and acts taken toward transfer. The remedy corrects administrative oversights so property is distributed according to the trust rather than under probate rules. Filing such a petition helps align public records with the settlor’s plan and can simplify trust administration for trustees and beneficiaries. When considering a petition, it is important to gather contemporaneous documentation and witness statements that support the claim. The court evaluates whether equitable relief is appropriate, so the strength of the factual record often determines the petition’s success. Early assessment of potential objections and coordination with title companies can influence strategy and help streamline post-order implementation.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies by case complexity and court calendar. Simple matters with clear documentation may be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months, while contested cases or those requiring additional discovery may take longer. Local probate court schedules and service requirements also affect timing. Preparing a complete petition with organized exhibits and declarations can reduce delays caused by supplemental filings and requests for further proof. Engaging counsel early helps identify likely timelines and procedural steps specific to Riverside County. Counsel can estimate timeframes based on local practice, prepare notice and filing requirements, and work to address objections promptly, which together can shorten overall processing time while ensuring procedural compliance.
The most persuasive evidence includes the trust instrument itself, signed but unrecorded deeds or drafts, communications showing intent to transfer property, and witness declarations describing the settlor’s actions and statements. Evidence that demonstrates both intent and a substantial step toward transfer strengthens the petition. Documentary proof should be organized chronologically and accompanied by clear explanatory declarations that connect facts to the legal standard for equitable relief. Professional records such as title company correspondence, bank paperwork, or signed forms for account retitling also carry significant weight. Presenting a coherent narrative supported by documentary exhibits and credible witness statements helps the court evaluate the request and increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent particular assets from entering formal probate by having the court recognize those assets as trust property. However, it does not retroactively fix all potential estate administration issues; each asset requires appropriate documentation and may have distinct post-order tasks. In many cases, a petition avoids the need to administer that asset through probate, streamlining distribution under the trust’s terms and reducing related costs and delays for beneficiaries. Although a petition can remove assets from the probate process, other estate matters may still require probate administration if assets lack trust-related documentation or if disputes remain unresolved. A comprehensive review of all estate assets helps determine whether additional proceedings are necessary.
Interested parties such as beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors typically must be notified when a Heggstad petition is filed. Proper notice ensures due process and allows interested individuals to object or provide additional information. The probate court will have rules governing who must receive notice and how it must be served, and compliance with those rules is essential for the court to render an enforceable order. Providing notice early also supports transparency and may encourage informal resolution of disputes before hearings. Involving interested parties in a timely manner helps the petitioner demonstrate good faith and compliance with procedural requirements, which benefits the court’s evaluation of the petition.
Creditors and lienholders may be affected by a Heggstad petition if the petition seeks to alter ownership of property subject to claims. The court considers creditor rights and may require notice or additional procedures to protect such parties. If liens exist, resolving them may be part of post-order implementation, and creditors may have legal avenues to preserve their claims against affected assets. Assessing potential creditor issues before filing helps tailor the petition and anticipate objections. Counsel can advise on necessary notices and whether additional steps, such as obtaining releases or addressing liens, are required to secure clear title and ensure the court’s order can be implemented without creating new disputes.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include corrective deeds, quiet title actions, or full probate administration, depending on the facts. Corrective deeds may suffice when parties agree and title companies accept the paperwork, while quiet title actions resolve disputes about ownership more generally. Probate administration remains an option when assets must be distributed under a will or intestacy, though it often involves greater time and expense than a targeted petition designed to treat assets as trust property. Choosing the best path depends on the available evidence, the presence of disputes, and the interests of beneficiaries and third parties. A thorough assessment helps determine which remedy most efficiently achieves clear ownership and aligns with the settlor’s intentions.
Title companies often accept a court order resulting from a Heggstad petition as sufficient proof to clear or insure title, but specific requirements vary. Some companies require the order itself, while others ask for additional affidavits, recorded documents, or particular language in the order. Understanding these preferences early allows petitioners to draft requests that meet a title company’s criteria for issuance of title insurance and recording of corrected documents. Coordinating with the title company before filing can prevent unexpected post-order requirements and streamline the transition from court order to corrected records. Counsel can work with title professionals to ensure necessary documentation accompanies the petition or is prepared promptly after the order issues.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition depend on complexity, local court fees, and whether the matter is contested. Simple matters with straightforward evidence and no opposition typically incur lower attorney fees and limited court costs. Contested petitions involving discovery, hearings, or complex title issues will have higher costs due to increased time and resources required to prepare and litigate the matter. Early case assessment helps estimate likely expenses and identify ways to control costs, such as gathering strong documentary evidence and seeking stipulations with interested parties where possible. Counsel can provide a fee estimate after reviewing the facts and recommend strategies to pursue the most cost-effective route to resolving the title issue.
If a trustee discovers an untransferred asset, the first step is to gather all relevant documents and communications that show the settlor’s intent and any attempts to transfer the asset. This includes copies of the trust, drafts or signed deeds, account forms, correspondence with institutions, and notes from the settlor or advisors. Organizing this evidence provides a factual foundation for deciding whether to file a Heggstad petition or pursue an alternative remedy. Next, trustees should determine and notify interested parties, review potential creditor or lien issues, and consult with counsel to evaluate the strongest legal path forward. Early legal guidance helps ensure procedural requirements are met and that any petition or corrective action is presented effectively to the probate court or institutions involved.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas