If a trust was intended to hold certain assets but those assets remain titled improperly, a Heggstad petition can be the legal avenue to correct the record and protect beneficiaries. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help individuals and families in Lakeview and throughout Riverside County understand when a Heggstad petition is appropriate and how the process works. This page explains the common scenarios that lead to these petitions, the typical court procedures, and how to preserve the settlor’s intent while minimizing delay and cost for the estate or trust.
A Heggstad petition often arises when there is credible evidence that assets were intended to be part of a trust but the paperwork or titling was not completed before the settlor’s incapacity or death. These matters require careful documentation and a clear presentation of circumstances to the court so that property is properly moved into the trust without full probate proceedings. Our firm provides practical guidance on gathering the necessary proof, preparing petition documents, and communicating with trustees and beneficiaries to reach resolutions that align with the settlor’s documented intentions and family needs.
A successful Heggstad petition can transfer property into a trust as intended, avoiding formal probate and reducing administrative delay and public court oversight. The petition helps ensure that the settlor’s plan for asset distribution is honored, preserving privacy and potentially saving time and expense for beneficiaries. In many cases, the remedy is less burdensome than full probate litigation because it focuses on correcting a specific titling error rather than managing an entire estate. Timely action and well-organized documentation increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and help reduce family conflict during an already sensitive time.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with a wide range of estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. We provide individualized attention to gather evidence, draft petitions, and represent clients during court proceedings when necessary. Our practice emphasizes clear communication with family members and trustees, careful review of estate documents, and practical strategies to correct titling errors while limiting time in superior court. Clients appreciate our focus on practical solutions that aim to protect settlor intent and preserve family relationships throughout the process.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial procedure used to have property declared part of a trust when there is evidence the property was intended to be held by the trust but was not formally transferred. This often occurs when a settlor failed to re-title assets or complete required deeds prior to incapacity or death. Successfully pursuing a petition requires assembling clear documentary evidence, witness testimony, and a persuasive legal argument that demonstrates the settlor’s intent. The court evaluates whether the property should be administered according to the trust terms rather than through standard probate administration.
The process typically begins with an investigation into the facts surrounding the asset, including examining account records, deeds, and any correspondence that indicates the settlor’s plan. Witness statements from those who knew the settlor’s intentions can be important, as can testimony from the trustee about attempted transfers. The petition sets forth the facts and requests the court to recognize the asset as trust property. While outcomes vary with individual circumstances, thoughtful preparation and clear proof increase the chance of achieving an order that aligns the property title with the trust instrument.
A Heggstad petition is named after a leading California case and is used when there is a gap between the settlor’s intent and the actual title of property. The petition asks the probate court to determine that certain assets are trust assets despite not being formally transferred. The judge will consider documentary evidence, the trust instrument, trustee actions, and credible witness accounts about the settlor’s intent. Courts look for clear and convincing proof to prevent fraudulent claims while honoring genuine attempts to fund a trust, balancing the need for reliable evidence with the settlor’s intended plan for asset distribution.
Important elements in a Heggstad petition include proof of the settlor’s intent, documentation showing an effort to transfer the asset to the trust, and explanation for why the transfer was incomplete. The attorney prepares a petition that identifies the property and outlines the evidence supporting trust ownership. The court may require notice to beneficiaries and interested parties and may schedule hearings to receive testimony. The objective is to obtain an order that places the property under the control of the trustee so that distribution and management follow the trust terms rather than through probate.
Understanding the terminology used in petitions and trust administration helps clients follow the process and participate effectively. This section explains common terms such as settlor, trustee, probate, trust funding, and related legal language. Clear definitions make it easier to gather relevant evidence, identify who must be notified, and anticipate court procedures. If questions arise about specific documents or terms, early clarification can reduce confusion and accelerate the path to a resolution that aligns property titles with the settlor’s documented plan.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and provided instructions for how assets should be managed and distributed. The settlor’s written trust document is the primary source for determining intent about asset distribution. When assets are not properly titled in the trust’s name, evidence of the settlor’s documented wishes, communications, and actions is used to establish that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Understanding the settlor’s role is essential for preparing a Heggstad petition that accurately reflects their intentions.
Trustee duties describe the responsibilities of the person or entity charged with administering the trust according to its terms. Duties include managing trust assets prudently, keeping accurate records, and distributing assets to beneficiaries as specified. In a Heggstad petition context, the trustee may provide declarations describing attempts to place property into the trust and actions taken to implement the settlor’s plan. The trustee’s statements and records can be important evidence when seeking a court determination that an asset should be treated as trust property.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering an estate when assets are not governed by a trust or other designated transfer mechanism. It often involves validating wills, inventorying assets, paying debts, and distributing remaining property to heirs under probate law. A Heggstad petition aims to avoid full probate for certain assets by demonstrating that those assets were intended to be trust property. When successful, the petition allows assets to be managed under the trust without undergoing the more extensive probate administration process.
Trust funding refers to the act of transferring assets into a trust so that they are governed by the trust instrument. Proper funding requires retitling accounts, transferring deeds, or changing beneficiary designations as appropriate. When funding is incomplete at the time of incapacity or death, a Heggstad petition can be used to align legal ownership with the settlor’s proven intent. Careful documentation of attempts to fund the trust and credible evidence of the settlor’s planning help the court decide whether to treat the property as trust assets.
When assets are not properly titled, there are several potential legal paths, including filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or pursuing other corrective deeds or beneficiary designation changes where possible. A Heggstad petition focuses on a court declaration that specific assets belong to the trust, often avoiding full probate for those items. Probate can be broader and more time consuming. In some cases, informal resolution among beneficiaries and trustees can achieve the desired result without court filings. Choosing the right approach depends on the strength of evidence, the relationships among involved parties, and the nature of the assets.
A limited court approach like a Heggstad petition can be effective when there is direct documentary evidence showing the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust. Examples include trust-related correspondence, account statements that indicate an intent to transfer, or deeds drafted but not recorded. When this evidence is straightforward and uncontested, the petition may provide a focused remedy correcting title without the broader scope of probate. Presenting a well-organized record of these materials streamlines court review and reduces time and cost compared with more extensive estate litigation.
If beneficiaries and the trustee agree on the settlor’s intent and the facts surrounding the untitled asset, a Heggstad petition can proceed smoothly with limited dispute. Cooperative resolution reduces the need for extended hearings and adversarial proceedings because parties can focus on documenting intent and filing a concise petition. Even with agreement, the court will review the evidence, but the lack of contention often leads to faster rulings and less legal expense. When relationships are cooperative, a targeted petition is often a practical path to restore the settlor’s plan.
A more comprehensive legal approach may be necessary when asset titles are complex, when there are multiple properties or accounts involved, or when multiple beneficiaries raise competing claims. These situations require thorough investigation, coordinated filings across jurisdictions, and careful handling of notices and potential contests. The legal process can involve drafting supplemental pleadings, assembling complex transactional records, and preparing for contested hearings. Addressing each of these elements thoughtfully helps protect the interests of beneficiaries and ensures the court can resolve ownership questions fairly and efficiently.
When family members or other interested parties disagree about asset ownership or the settlor’s intent, a broader legal strategy is often required. Such disputes may necessitate discovery, depositions, and multiple court appearances to resolve inconsistencies in witness statements and documentary records. A comprehensive approach includes preparing for contested litigation, protecting client rights during negotiations, and seeking interim court orders if necessary to preserve assets. Navigating these disputes with careful legal preparation helps ensure a fair process and a resolution that reflects the settlor’s demonstrated intentions.
A comprehensive approach can reduce the risk of future challenges by providing robust documentation and legal reasoning to support a court determination. It anticipates potential objections and compiles evidence in a way the court can evaluate with clarity. This thorough preparation can speed resolution in contested matters and limit opportunities for later disputes. Taking a holistic view of the estate plan and any related documents also allows for identifying additional issues that might need attention, such as beneficiary updates or title corrections for related assets.
Another benefit is streamlining trustee administration once assets are properly recognized as trust property. With clear court orders and corrected titles, trustees can manage and distribute assets according to the trust terms without ongoing litigation. This preserves family privacy by avoiding drawn-out probate proceedings in open court. Additionally, thorough legal work provides clients with confidence that the trust will be administered as intended and that distribution will follow the settlor’s directions, reducing stress and uncertainty for family members during settlement.
When a petition is supported by comprehensive documentation and careful legal argument, there is a lower likelihood that the decision will be successfully challenged later. Preparing detailed evidence, obtaining supporting declarations, and addressing foreseeable objections helps create a durable court record. That record provides clarity for trustees and beneficiaries on how assets should be managed and distributed. Reduced risk of future disputes benefits heirs by providing greater certainty and allowing trustees to proceed without anticipating further litigation or re-litigation of resolved titles.
A comprehensive strategy leads to efficient trust administration by securing clear court guidance and corrected asset titling, enabling trustees to carry out the settlor’s plan without interruption. This minimizes the administrative burden and helps beneficiaries receive distributions in line with the trust terms. Properly addressing title issues also protects the settlor’s documented wishes and preserves family relationships by reducing uncertainty. Clear court orders and precise documentation create a foundation for predictable management of trust property going forward.
Begin by collecting all documents that show the settlor’s intention to fund the trust, including drafts of deeds, trust-related correspondence, bank statements, beneficiary designation forms, and any notes indicating planning steps. Documentation that shows a consistent intent to transfer specific assets to the trust will strengthen a petition. Keep records of communications with financial institutions and copies of any attempted transfers. Organizing these items chronologically and providing a concise summary of each document helps streamline legal review and presentation to the court.
Prompt action can reduce complications and the potential for disagreements as memories fade and records become harder to locate. Notify trustees and beneficiaries early and provide clear information about the purpose of the petition and the evidence being gathered. Open communication may lead to agreement among parties and a faster resolution. When disputes arise, early legal guidance helps preserve documents and prepares the case for court consideration, improving the likelihood of a favorable outcome that aligns titles with the trust.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets remain outside the trust despite clear planning intent by the settlor, when you want to avoid the expense and publicity of probate, or when the asset is significant to the estate’s administration. The petition offers a path to place assets under trust administration without opening a full probate case for those items. It can be a practical solution when the settlor made a bona fide effort to fund the trust but technical or procedural obstacles prevented completion. Acting to correct titles protects beneficiaries and preserves the settlor’s plan.
You should also consider this remedy when transfers were interrupted by sudden incapacity or death, or when an intended transfer was lost in administrative error. If a financial account or real property was meant to be owned by the trust, a petition can eliminate ambiguity about rightful ownership. This is particularly helpful for assets that would otherwise be subject to probate administration. Taking appropriate legal steps early helps minimize conflict among beneficiaries and provides a clear path for trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust.
Typical circumstances include when deed transfers were prepared but not recorded, when bank accounts were intended to be retitled to the trust but were left in the settlor’s name, or when beneficiary designations were not updated as planned. Other situations involve retirement accounts with naming issues, life insurance policies not assigned to the trust, or property purchased in the settlor’s name after the trust was created. In each scenario, the court will consider evidence of intent and any steps taken to effect the transfer before determining whether to place the asset in the trust.
Real property that was intended to be owned by the trust but lacks a recorded deed in the trust’s name is a common basis for a Heggstad petition. Circumstances may include deeds left unsigned, delays in recording, or clerical oversights. Resolving title problems requires evidence of the settlor’s intention to place the property in the trust and any preparation of transfer documents. A successful petition allows the property to be managed and distributed according to the trust, which can avoid opening probate for that asset and maintain confidentiality around the trust terms.
Bank and brokerage accounts that were meant to be retitled to the trust but remain in the settlor’s name can create unexpected probate exposure. These accounts are often easier to resolve with documentation of intent, such as account paperwork or communications with financial institutions indicating plans to transfer. A Heggstad petition can request that the court recognize these accounts as trust property based on the settlor’s documented plan. Doing so helps ensure funds are administered and distributed according to the trust instrument rather than probate rules.
Retirement accounts and insurance policies that were supposed to name the trust as beneficiary but still list individual beneficiaries can cause distribution outcomes that diverge from the trust plan. While beneficiary designations often control, when there is evidence the settlor intended the trust to receive the proceeds, a court may consider that intent in the context of other assets and planning. A Heggstad petition and related legal steps can address inconsistencies by presenting a clear record of the settlor’s intent and any steps taken to align beneficiary designations with the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Lakeview and throughout Riverside County with practical legal help for trust funding problems and Heggstad petitions. We provide clear guidance on collecting the necessary evidence, preparing the petition, and coordinating with trustees and beneficiaries to pursue a fair outcome. Our goal is to correct title issues efficiently while protecting the settlor’s plan and minimizing emotional and financial strain on family members. Contact our office to discuss your situation and learn how to move forward with confidence.
Clients choose our firm for focused attention to detail, careful preparation of court materials, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s needs. We take time to review trust documents, identify missing transfers, and assemble the evidence the court needs to recognize intended trust ownership. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries to pursue efficient resolutions and reduce the chances of extended litigation. By prioritizing organized preparation and thoughtful strategy, we aim to achieve outcomes that honor the settlor’s wishes and support trustees in administering the trust.
We understand the importance of handling sensitive family matters with discretion and respect. When title problems arise, emotions can run high, and prompt, organized legal attention helps prevent misunderstandings from escalating. Our office explains the options available, the likely steps in court, and how to present evidence in the most persuasive manner. That clarity helps families make informed decisions and reduces uncertainty about how assets will be managed once the court addresses the petition. Practical guidance early in the process often leads to quicker, less disruptive resolutions.
From initial assessment through filing and court proceedings, our work aims to limit unnecessary expense and focus on the most effective path forward. When it is possible to reach agreement among parties, we support negotiated solutions; when court action is required, we prepare a strong and well-documented petition. Our office serves clients in Lakeview, Riverside County, and across California, drawing on a background in estate planning and trust administration to present a clear record that helps judges make informed decisions about trust ownership.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust document and all related records to identify any assets that were intended for the trust but not properly transferred. We then gather supporting evidence, prepare declarations, and draft the petition tailored to the specific asset and circumstances. We provide guidance on notice requirements to beneficiaries and coordinate with trustees. If the matter is contested, we prepare for hearings; if parties agree, we seek an efficient court order to place the asset into trust ownership, minimizing delay and expense for all involved.
The first step focuses on understanding the facts and locating relevant documentation to support the petition. This includes reviewing the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any prior steps taken to transfer the asset. We evaluate witness availability for declarations and identify potential procedural hurdles. This foundational work ensures the petition will be supported by organized proof that demonstrates the settlor’s intention and explains why the transfer was not completed before incapacity or death.
We carefully review the trust document and related estate planning materials to determine which assets should be in the trust and which are outside it. This step includes comparing account titles and deeds against the trust schedule and identifying any inconsistencies or recent transactions that affect ownership. Accurate identification of each item and the nature of the defect in titling allows us to prepare a focused petition and assemble the most relevant supporting evidence for the court’s consideration.
We locate and interview individuals who can provide firsthand knowledge of the settlor’s intentions, including family members, advisors, and trustees. Witness statements are prepared as declarations that describe factual observations and actions taken by the settlor related to trust funding. These declarations are drafted to be clear, factual, and aligned with documentary evidence, providing persuasive support for the petition and helping the court understand the context in which transfers were attempted but not completed.
After gathering evidence, we draft the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations, exhibit documents, and any required notices to interested parties. The petition outlines the facts, identifies the property, and requests a court determination that the asset is trust property. We ensure that statutory and local filing requirements are met and that all interested parties receive appropriate notice. Proper drafting and attention to procedural details reduce the risk of delays or objections that could complicate the court’s review.
Drafting includes a clear factual statement of the settlor’s actions and intent, supported by exhibits such as trust pages, deeds, account statements, and written communications. Each exhibit is referenced within the petition to make the evidentiary record easy for the court to review. We also prepare declarations from trustees and witnesses to corroborate the documentation. A well-organized petition that ties facts to exhibits facilitates the judge’s determination and can shorten the timeline for obtaining an order.
Once filed, the petition must be served on beneficiaries and other interested parties according to statutory requirements. We handle filing with the court and arrange proper service to prevent procedural objections. When appropriate, we communicate with parties to clarify the petition’s purpose and explore whether agreement can be reached without contested hearings. Proper notice and early communication often lead to cooperative resolutions, but when disputes arise we are prepared to proceed with litigation to protect the settlor’s documented intent.
The court may schedule hearings to receive testimony and review the evidence supporting the petition. If parties agree on the facts, the court may issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property after considering the petition and declarations. In contested matters, hearings provide a forum for addressing conflicting accounts and allow the judge to weigh credibility and documentary proof. Once the court issues an order, the trustee can retitle or otherwise control the property under the trust terms, enabling administration consistent with the settlor’s plan.
During hearings, the judge evaluates documentary evidence and hears witness testimony about the settlor’s intent and actions taken to transfer property to the trust. The quality and coherence of the evidentiary record are critical at this stage. We prepare witnesses and organize exhibits for efficient presentation so the court can readily see how the facts support recognition of the asset as trust property. Effective presentation helps the judge make a reasoned decision and can reduce the likelihood of further challenges.
If the court grants the petition, it issues an order declaring the asset to be trust property, which can be used to update titles, deeds, and account registrations. The trustee can then proceed with management and distribution consonant with the trust terms, providing beneficiaries with clarity about their rights. We assist in implementing the court order by preparing any documents required to retitle property and advising trustees on how to record or present the order to financial institutions. This final step ensures the practical effect of the court’s ruling.
A Heggstad petition is a court proceeding that requests a judge to declare certain property to be part of a trust when the settlor intended the property to be held by the trust but the title was not transferred. This remedy is appropriate when there is credible documentary or testimonial evidence showing the settlor’s plan and actions toward funding the trust, such as drafted deeds, account paperwork, or repeated statements of intent. The petition sets forth facts and supporting exhibits for the court to evaluate whether the asset should be treated as trust property. When considering a Heggstad petition, the court will assess whether the evidence shows the settlor’s consistent intention to fund the trust and whether steps were taken that were not completed due to oversight, incapacity, or other reasons. If a clear record exists, the petition can result in an order that places the asset into trust ownership, limiting the need for probate for that specific property. Working with counsel helps ensure you gather the most persuasive evidence and present it clearly to the court.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on how contested the matter is and the court’s calendar. In uncontested cases with strong documentary support and agreement among interested parties, a petition may be resolved within a few months after filing, subject to statutory notice periods and court scheduling. In contested matters, additional time is needed for discovery, hearings, and possible appeals, which can extend the process significantly. Early case preparation and cooperative parties usually shorten the timeline. Court procedures and local rules also influence timing, so working with local counsel familiar with Riverside County practice helps anticipate scheduling and procedural requirements. Promptly gathering evidence, preparing declarations, and serving notices according to the rules avoids avoidable delays. Even in contested situations, careful preparation improves efficiency and can lead to resolution without prolonged litigation.
Support for a Heggstad petition rests on documentation and credible witness statements that show the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Useful documents include the trust instrument, drafts of deeds, account statements indicating intent to transfer, correspondence with financial institutions, and notes or memos prepared by the settlor. Declarations from trustees, family members, or advisors who observed the settlor’s actions or plans can corroborate the written record and provide context for the court to consider. The court typically looks for a coherent and consistent set of facts that demonstrate intent and attempted action to fund the trust. Evidence should be organized so each item is clearly tied to the petition’s assertions, and witnesses should provide factual, firsthand accounts rather than speculation. The stronger and more consistent the documentation, the higher the likelihood the court will recognize the asset as trust property.
A Heggstad petition can prevent probate for specific assets that were intended to be trust property but were not properly titled, but it does not automatically eliminate probate for the entire estate. The petition addresses particular items by asking the court to recognize them as trust assets. If a majority of assets are thus corrected, probate may be unnecessary, but the outcome depends on the overall estate composition and whether other assets require probate administration. Each asset requires its own analysis and supporting proof. When planning to avoid probate more broadly, it is important to review all assets and beneficiary designations to ensure they align with the trust. A comprehensive review can identify other titling or designation issues and allow for multiple petitions or corrective steps where needed. Addressing problems proactively reduces the likelihood that probate will be required for significant estate components.
When filing a Heggstad petition, statutory notice requirements typically mandate that beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, and other interested parties receive proper notification. The court must ensure that those with potential rights to the property have an opportunity to respond or object. Notice procedures vary by jurisdiction and the nature of the proceeding, so ensuring correct service is essential to avoid procedural challenges that could delay the petition or invalidate a court order. It is also prudent to communicate with interested parties early in the process to explain the petition’s purpose and the evidence being presented. Where parties are cooperative, disputes may be resolved without contested hearings. When disagreements are likely, following strict service rules and documenting attempts to notify interested parties protects the record and supports the petition’s validity.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition depend on factors such as the complexity of the ownership issues, the amount of evidence and witness preparation required, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation and cooperative parties generally involve lower legal fees and court costs. Contested matters requiring discovery, depositions, and multiple hearings will incur higher fees. The specific court filing fees are modest relative to attorney fees, but total costs vary based on the scope of work necessary to present a persuasive petition. Discussing budget and anticipated steps early with counsel helps set expectations and can identify cost-saving measures, such as targeted evidence collection or attempts to achieve agreement among parties. A clear plan and open communication about fees can reduce surprises and help parties make informed choices about pursuing the petition or exploring alternative resolutions.
Yes. Family members or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition if they believe the evidence of the settlor’s intent is insufficient or if they claim a competing ownership interest. Contests may involve disputes about the credibility of witnesses, the authenticity of documents, or differing interpretations of the settlor’s actions. When a petition is contested, the court will evaluate conflicting evidence and determine which account more accurately reflects the settlor’s intent and the property’s proper ownership. Preparing for potential contests requires gathering strong documentation, obtaining clear witness declarations, and being ready to address opposing claims through legal pleadings and testimony. Early attempts to resolve disagreements through communication can sometimes prevent contests, but when litigation becomes necessary, careful legal preparation helps present the most persuasive case to the court and protects the settlor’s demonstrated intentions.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset will typically remain outside the trust and may be subject to probate administration or alternate distribution methods under law. A denial may reflect insufficient evidence of the settlor’s intent or unresolved disputes about ownership. The court’s ruling will explain the reasons for the decision, and those affected should review the order with counsel to understand next steps, which may include probate proceedings or other legal remedies to address the asset’s disposition. In some circumstances, there may be options to gather additional evidence and refile or to pursue appeals if appropriate under the rules. However, appeals can be time consuming and require careful legal assessment. Consulting with counsel about the court’s reasoning helps determine whether further action is advisable or whether alternate property or estate planning solutions should be pursued to protect beneficiary interests.
Court filings related to a Heggstad petition are typically public records once filed with the probate court, which means the petition and resulting order can be accessed by interested parties and members of the public. That said, using a Heggstad petition to correct title and place property under a trust can ultimately reduce the need for a broader probate case and thereby limit the extent of public disclosure about a settlor’s full estate plan. Some jurisdictions allow sealing or protective orders in rare circumstances, but routine petitions are accessible in court records. If privacy is a primary concern, discussing options early can help identify strategies that minimize public exposure, such as seeking cooperative resolutions with beneficiaries to reduce the need for additional public filings. Counsel can also advise on whether any limited sealing options may apply in your case and how to balance privacy concerns with the need to obtain a judicial determination to correct title.
To start the process, gather any trust documents, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and notes that reflect the settlor’s intent to place specific assets in the trust. Make a list of the assets in question, note who holds title now, and identify potential witnesses who can confirm the settlor’s plans. Contact a firm experienced in trust administration to describe the situation and receive guidance on the types of evidence that will be most helpful in preparing a petition. Early consultation helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the best path or whether alternative corrective actions might achieve the same result. An initial review will outline the likely steps, estimated timelines, and documentation needed so you can proceed efficiently and preserve important records and witness recollections while memories remain fresh.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas