A Heggstad petition can be the path to place real property into a trust when the deed was never retitled but the decedent intended trust ownership. Residents of Mecca and Riverside County turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for clear guidance on resolving property-title issues without unnecessary court delays. This introductory overview explains what a Heggstad petition addresses, how it interacts with revocable living trusts and pour-over wills, and what property owners and their representative trustees should expect from the process. We focus on practical steps to achieve the trust’s intended distribution and to reduce uncertainty for heirs.
When a trustmaker clearly intended to fund a trust but the property title remains in the decedent’s name, families can face a blockage to carrying out estate planning goals. A Heggstad petition asks the court to correct the record by confirming the trust’s ownership interest based on the decedent’s intent and surrounding circumstances. In Mecca and across California, these petitions often accompany other trust administration filings such as certifications of trust, pour-over wills, and trustee transfers. This page explains how the petition works, what evidence is typically considered, and the outcomes clients can reasonably expect when pursuing resolution.
Filing a Heggstad petition addresses a common but serious barrier to completing a decedent’s estate plan: when property titles were not changed to reflect trust ownership. This legal action helps trustees and beneficiaries confirm that property should be treated as trust assets, which streamlines transfer, avoids separate probate for that asset, and aligns legal title with the decedent’s intent. For families in Mecca, resolving title problems through a petition reduces delays in asset distribution, clarifies tax and reporting obligations, and permits trustees to manage or sell property under trust terms. The outcome protects the trust’s design and provides certainty to beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California, including homeowners and trustees in Riverside County and Mecca. Our practice focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, Heggstad petitions, and related filings. We emphasize clear communication, thorough preparation of court submissions, and strategic problem solving tailored to each family’s circumstances. When title complications arise, our approach centers on documenting intent, compiling reliable evidence, and pursuing efficient resolution to place assets in the trust as originally planned, so beneficiaries can move forward with confidence.
A Heggstad petition in California asks the probate court to declare that certain property should be treated as having been transferred to a trust despite the absence of a change in recorded title. The petition relies on evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, such as trust documents, signed estate planning instruments, declarations, correspondence, beneficiary designations, or conduct showing trust ownership. In Mecca, trustees commonly pursue this route when real estate, vehicles, or other titled assets were meant to be trust property but remain in the decedent’s name, potentially complicating administration and distribution under the trust’s terms.
The court evaluates the totality of the evidence and may order that the property be treated as trust-owned, allowing trustees to manage, sell, or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust. Heggstad petitions can be particularly effective when the trust itself clearly identifies the asset or there are contemporaneous documents demonstrating intent. The procedure involves preparing a formal petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits, and then presenting the matter to the probate court. Outcomes can include recorded orders that facilitate title transfer to the trustee, reducing the need for separate probate proceedings for that asset.
A Heggstad petition is named after a California appellate decision and serves to align recorded title with the decedent’s testamentary or trust intentions. It is used where the trustmaker intended a particular asset to belong to the trust but technicalities left title in the individual’s name. The petition asks the probate court to declare that the asset is trust property and to authorize appropriate orders or filings that enable the trustee to carry out trust duties. This remedy provides a judicial declaration that supports administrative actions, including record changes and sales, consistent with the trust’s directives and the decedent’s wishes.
Courts consider several elements when evaluating a Heggstad petition, including the trust document, any intermediary agreements, the decedent’s declarations of intent, transfer attempts, and conduct indicating ownership by the trust. Evidence may include related estate planning instruments such as pour-over wills, signed deeds, beneficiary designations, trust funding steps, and testimony from witnesses or the trustee. The process typically requires preparing a petition, serving interested parties, filing supporting declarations and exhibits, and attending a hearing where the court decides whether to grant the requested relief and issue orders that enable the trustee to record the appropriate changes.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate the Heggstad petition process. Below are concise definitions of terms frequently used during trust funding and title correction matters. These definitions describe legal concepts, documents, and procedural steps that appear in petitions and court orders. Familiarity with these terms assists trustees and beneficiaries in compiling the necessary evidence and ensuring that filings accurately reflect the trustmaker’s intent. Clear terminology also supports effective communication with the court and with other parties during the administration of the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing requesting a judicial declaration that a specific asset should be treated as owned by a trust despite the recorded title remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition presents evidence of the decedent’s intent to transfer the asset to the trust and asks the court to issue an order that facilitates trust administration. The remedy addresses gaps in the formal record that would otherwise prevent the trustee from managing, selling, or distributing the asset under the trust’s terms and is typically used to avoid separate probate for that item.
A certification of trust is a shortened document that provides essential facts about the trust for third parties without disclosing the full trust text. It typically includes the trust’s creation date, the identity of the trustee and successor trustees, and the powers granted to the trustee. The certification helps banks, title companies, and other entities recognize the trustee’s authority to handle trust assets. In Heggstad matters, a certification of trust may accompany supporting evidence to demonstrate that the trust existed and that the trustee is authorized to act on its behalf.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets still in the decedent’s individual name at death to be transferred into an existing trust. It operates as a safety net to capture assets not previously moved into the trust. While a pour-over will can transfer title through probate if necessary, relying on it alone can create delays. When the intent was to fund the trust before death, a Heggstad petition may be used to avoid probate for those assets by confirming trust ownership based on the trustmaker’s intent and surrounding evidence.
A revocable living trust is an estate planning instrument created during the grantor’s lifetime to hold assets for management and distribution according to the grantor’s instructions. The grantor usually serves as trustee and can modify or revoke the trust while alive. Upon the grantor’s incapacity or death, a successor trustee manages trust assets and distributes them without probate when assets are titled in the trust’s name. When titled assets remain in the grantor’s name, a Heggstad petition may be used to align recorded ownership with the trust’s intended holdings.
When property intended for a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, trustees and heirs face choices about how to proceed. Options include filing a Heggstad petition to correct title without full probate for that asset, initiating probate for assets that must pass under a will, or negotiating with title companies and third parties to accept trust documentation. Each path has different timelines, costs, and evidentiary requirements. A Heggstad petition can be more efficient when the evidence of intent is strong, whereas probate may be necessary if the property is disputed or records are unclear. Careful evaluation of the facts guides the best approach.
A limited approach may be appropriate when documents clearly show that the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust and third parties are likely to accept a certification of trust or other records without a full court order. Examples include recorded documents naming the trust, transfer-on-death forms, or contemporaneous deeds indicating transfer steps. In these situations, the trustee may be able to provide the necessary evidence to banks, title companies, or buyers to facilitate transfer or sale without pursuing formal court relief, conserving time and expense for the estate and beneficiaries.
When financial institutions, title companies, or potential buyers are willing to accept trust documentation and the parties with an interest in the property do not contest trust ownership, a simple administrative resolution can be effective. Trustees may present a certification of trust, identification, and supporting affidavits to complete transactions. This route avoids the time and cost of court proceedings, but it depends on cooperation from third parties and the absence of disputes among heirs or creditors. When those conditions exist, administrative steps can return assets to trust management promptly.
When beneficiaries, creditors, or other interested parties dispute whether an asset belongs to the trust, court intervention through a Heggstad petition may be required to obtain a definitive legal ruling. Disputes can arise from ambiguous documents, gaps in the record, or conflicting testimony about the decedent’s intent. In these circumstances, preparing a complete petition with detailed declarations, documentary evidence, and legal argument provides the judge with the materials needed to render a final decision that resolves ownership and permits the trustee to proceed with administration.
Complex situations, such as properties with multiple prior deeds, unclear conveyance chains, or missing documentation, often justify a comprehensive legal approach. When straightforward administrative submissions are unlikely to persuade third parties or when title companies require a court order before recording transfers, a formal petition helps create an authoritative record. The process may involve locating historical records, obtaining witness statements, and addressing potential creditor claims, all of which are handled through the petition and related probate filings to secure a clear path forward for the trust.
A comprehensive approach that includes a Heggstad petition provides certainty that administrative measures may not achieve. A court order confirming trust ownership creates a public record and reduces the risk of future challenges to title. This clarity benefits trustees who need to sell, refinance, or transfer property, and it reassures beneficiaries about the distribution of trust assets. In jurisdictions like Riverside County, where title companies may be cautious about nonstandard transfers, a judicial declaration often unlocks transactions and avoids repeated disputes.
Beyond title clearance, a court resolution can streamline the remainder of trust administration by removing doubt about asset ownership and enabling the trustee to take actions authorized by the trust. It can limit ongoing liability for the trustee and provide heirs with a firmer timeline for distribution. Although court proceedings involve time and cost, the long-term stability and the prevention of future litigation or title issues frequently make a comprehensive path the most prudent choice for complex matters or for assets of significant value.
A court order resulting from a Heggstad petition establishes public confirmation of the trust’s ownership interest, which reduces the likelihood of later challenges and creates an authoritative basis for recording transfers. This public record benefits future transactions, as title companies and lenders can rely on the court’s determination when clearing title for sale or refinancing. The finality that a judicial ruling provides prevents recurring disputes and supports efficient administration, particularly when the property is a major trust asset or when beneficiaries prefer a clear, court-backed resolution.
A judicial declaration relieves trustees from uncertainty about whether their actions are legally authorized with respect to the asset, which reduces the risk of personal liability for decisions made in good faith. Beneficiaries gain predictability about timing and distribution once the court confirms ownership and authorizes trustee actions. That predictability is particularly valuable for families who need to sell property to satisfy obligations, divide proceeds, or fulfill the trustmaker’s wishes without ongoing contention among heirs or unexpected title objections from third parties.
Begin by collecting all documents that show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This includes the trust instrument, any deeds, related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, correspondence that references trust ownership, and bank or escrow records showing attempted transfers. Detailed records make it easier to present a coherent narrative to the court and third parties. Photographs of asset records, dated correspondence, and witness statements can also strengthen a petition. Organized evidence reduces delays and improves the clarity of the legal filing.
Understand the requirements of title companies, lenders, or third parties who will need to accept a transfer. In some situations, a recorded court order following a Heggstad petition will be necessary to satisfy title companies. Planning for the recording step and anticipating any additional endorsements or affidavits can prevent last-minute complications. Ensuring that documents are properly prepared for recording, including conforming copies of the order and accurate legal descriptions, streamlines the post-order transfer and supports clean title for future transactions.
Residents of Mecca may encounter title issues when assets intended for a revocable living trust remain in the decedent’s individual name at death. This situation can delay trustee actions such as managing, selling, or distributing property according to the trust. A Heggstad petition provides a judicial method to align recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s intent, enabling trustees to follow the trust’s directions more efficiently. Families should consider this service when documentation indicates intent but administrative avenues are insufficient to clear title or when third parties require a court order.
Choosing to pursue a Heggstad petition also protects trustees and heirs by creating an authoritative record that reduces future disputes. When property is a significant portion of the estate or when parties disagree about ownership, a court determination can prevent protracted disagreement. This route also benefits situations where title companies or lenders will not accept informal documentation, making a recorded court order the most reliable means to complete real estate transactions or settle the estate’s affairs according to the trust.
Typical scenarios include when a decedent executed a revocable living trust but neglected to retitle real estate, when a deed was prepared but not recorded, when multiple family members believe the asset should belong to the trust, or when a lender or title company requires a court order to clear title. Other circumstances involve transfers attempted shortly before death or documents that refer to trust ownership without formal conveyance. Each of these facts can justify a petition to confirm trust ownership and facilitate proper administration of the asset within the trust structure.
When a deed intended to transfer property into a trust was executed but never recorded before the trustmaker’s death, the property remains in the decedent’s name and complicates administration. A Heggstad petition can demonstrate that the decedent intended the transfer to the trust and request a judicial declaration to that effect. The court’s order can then be used to place the property under the trustee’s control, enabling sale, refinancing, or distribution under the trust without requiring full probate for that asset.
Disputes arise when family members or interested parties provide differing accounts of whether an asset was meant to be trust property. Conflicting statements can stall transactions and provoke litigation unless a court resolves the matter. Filing a Heggstad petition lets the probate court weigh the evidence, consider witness declarations and documents, and issue a definitive ruling. This judicial resolution provides a clear basis for trustees to proceed and diminishes the risk of ongoing conflict over the asset’s status.
Title companies and lenders sometimes require a court order or specific affidavits before accepting a transfer from an individual to a trustee, especially when the recorded title does not match the trust documents. In these cases, a Heggstad petition produces the necessary order to satisfy third-party requirements and to allow recording of the trustee’s ownership. Addressing these institutional demands through the court process can be more efficient than prolonged negotiations and ensures that transactions will close with clear title.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in Mecca and Riverside County with Heggstad petitions and trust funding matters. We provide guidance from the initial evidence gathering through filing and, if necessary, court hearings that secure orders permitting trustees to manage or transfer property. Our approach focuses on clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, thorough preparation of declarations and exhibits, and practical solutions that aim to preserve the trustmaker’s intentions while minimizing expense and delay for the family.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for our focused handling of estate planning complications such as Heggstad petitions, trust administration filings, and related probate matters. We work to prepare thorough petitions and supporting evidence, manage procedural requirements, and represent trustees’ interests before the court. By anticipating title company needs and potential objections, we aim to secure effective outcomes that allow trustees to put assets into the trust and proceed with the distribution plan that the trustmaker intended.
Our practice emphasizes responsive client communication and careful documentation of the facts that support trust ownership. We guide clients through the filing process, advise on interactions with title companies and lenders, and seek resolutions that minimize contentious litigation. When court involvement is necessary, we prepare filings that clearly present the trustmaker’s intent and the legal basis for the requested order, helping trustees obtain recorded clearance of title and move forward with administration and distribution.
We also assist with related estate planning needs that commonly arise during petitions, such as preparing or updating certifications of trust, pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and powers of attorney. Addressing these documents together helps ensure that the trust’s structure and supporting records are complete and that trustees have the authority and documentation needed to manage trust assets confidently and efficiently for the benefit of the beneficiaries.
Our process begins with an in-depth review of the trust documents and any available deeds, correspondence, or records that show the decedent’s intent. We identify relevant witnesses, collect supportive evidence, and advise on communications with interested parties. Next, we prepare the petition, accompanying declarations, and exhibits, and handle service and filing. If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present the evidence and legal argument to the court to obtain an order that clarifies ownership and permits recording. We then assist with any post-order recording or title tasks necessary to complete the transfer.
The first step focuses on documenting the circumstances that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and identifying any records needed to support the petition. We review trust instruments, unrecorded deeds, correspondence, escrow papers, and bank records. Witness statements from persons familiar with the trustmaker’s actions and conversations can support the petition. We also check for related estate planning documents like pour-over wills or beneficiary designations that reinforce the trust’s purpose. A thorough assessment ensures the petition is supported by a coherent and persuasive evidentiary record.
We help clients locate and compile documents that demonstrate intent, including the trust document, any deeds or transfer instruments, correspondence, escrow records, and financial records. Organizing these documents chronologically and preparing concise summaries or declarations that explain each item’s significance makes the petition clearer to the court. Proper organization also streamlines the process for title companies and third parties who may later review the court order for recording purposes, reducing friction during post-order transfers.
Carefully drafted declarations from trustees, witnesses, and professionals can present the factual narrative the court needs to assess the petition. Declarations should describe the trustmaker’s intent, relevant conversations, actions taken toward funding the trust, and any failures to record deeds, with supporting exhibits attached. We guide trustees and witnesses on preparing clear, factual declarations that address common questions from the court and avoid unnecessary disputes, helping to build a compelling, well-documented filing.
After assembling the evidence, we prepare the formal petition and supporting documents for filing with the probate court. We ensure compliance with local rules for service on interested parties and prepare the court packet for the judge’s review. Our team monitors filing deadlines, serves notice to heirs and creditors as required, and addresses any preliminary procedural matters. If opposition arises, we assess the issues and work to resolve them through negotiation when possible or prepare for contested proceedings when necessary.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is essential for the court to consider a petition. We follow statutory requirements for service and filing, prepare proof of service documents, and manage deadlines. Failing to provide correct notice can delay proceedings or jeopardize the petition’s validity, so careful attention to procedure is a key part of our approach. We also identify parties who may have an interest in the asset so they can be included in the process from the outset.
When potential objections or questions arise, early engagement and negotiation can sometimes narrow the issues or produce stipulations that make the court hearing smoother. We explore settlement options, prepare proposed orders, and advise trustees on offers that protect the trust’s objectives. If agreement cannot be reached, we prepare to present the contested matters at hearing with focused evidence and legal argument designed to obtain the order needed to confirm trust ownership and permit the trustee to proceed.
If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order declaring the asset to be trust property or otherwise resolving the title issue. We prepare conforming copies suitable for recording and coordinate with title companies and county recording offices. If the matter requires further action, such as entry of supplemental orders or clarifying language for recording, we handle those steps and assist the trustee in carrying out authorized transactions. Our goal is to ensure the court’s decision translates into practical title clearance and asset management.
The court’s order provides the legal foundation to record changes and to present to title companies and lenders. We review the order language with the client to confirm its sufficiency for recording and for the trustee’s intended actions. When necessary, we prepare escrow instructions or other documents that accompany the recorded order to finalize the transfer. Ensuring the order is properly framed for real-world transactions prevents follow-up disputes and supports efficient completion of sales, refinances, or distributions.
After recording the court order, we assist with any remaining steps to finalize the trustee’s authority over the asset. This may involve coordinating with title companies to update title reports, providing copies of the certification of trust, and ensuring that deeds or conveyance instruments are correctly completed and recorded. Our aim is to translate the court’s ruling into a clean title and to help trustees complete sales, transfers, or distributions in a manner consistent with the trustmaker’s intent and the terms of the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing asking the probate court to declare that a particular asset should be treated as trust property despite being recorded in the decedent’s name. It is used when the trustmaker clearly intended the asset to be part of the trust but failed to complete the necessary title transfers. The petition presents documentary and testimonial evidence of intent and requests an order that enables the trustee to manage, sell, or distribute the property under the trust’s terms. This approach is particularly useful when administrative measures cannot resolve the title discrepancy. A petition is appropriate when evidence such as the trust instrument, unrecorded deeds, correspondence, or other contemporaneous records supports the conclusion that the asset was meant to belong to the trust. If third parties like title companies require a recorded court order before accepting a transfer, the petition can produce that order and prevent the asset from being subject to separate probate. The court’s ruling then provides clarity and allows the trustee to act consistently with the trustmaker’s intent.
Timing for a Heggstad petition can vary based on the case complexity, local court schedules, and whether the matter is contested. In straightforward, uncontested matters with clear documentation, the process can be relatively quick, moving from filing to order within several weeks to a few months depending on court availability. When evidence is well organized and interested parties do not oppose the petition, the court can often resolve the issue without extended hearings or litigation. In contrast, cases with competing claims, missing documentation, or significant disputes among beneficiaries can take longer. If the petition leads to contested hearings, additional time is required to prepare evidence, conduct depositions or obtain declarations, and schedule a contested hearing. It is important to plan for potential delays and to communicate with the court and interested parties to keep the process moving efficiently.
The most persuasive evidence for a Heggstad petition demonstrates the trustmaker’s contemporaneous intent to transfer the asset into the trust. Key items include the trust document itself, any deeds or transfer instruments that reference the trust, correspondence or written instructions showing the grantor’s intent, escrow or bank records indicating steps taken to fund the trust, and witness statements describing the grantor’s actions and declarations. Certifications of trust and related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills can also support the petition. Properly prepared declarations from trustees and witnesses that explain the significance of each document and the sequence of events are essential. Organized exhibits that show dates, signatures, and corroborating records help the court evaluate the totality of the evidence. Evidence that ties the asset closely to the trustmaker’s plan and shows affirmative steps toward trust funding will strengthen the petition and increase the likelihood of a favorable order.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that an asset should be treated as trust property, which can effectively avoid separate probate for that particular item. When the court issues an order confirming trust ownership, the trustee can use that order to record transfers and administer the asset under the trust without initiating a separate probate proceeding for that asset. This outcome aligns the recorded title with the decedent’s intent and streamlines administration for that piece of property. However, whether probate is entirely avoided for all estate assets depends on the broader estate plan and whether other assets require probate. The petition addresses specific title discrepancies; other items not held in trust or covered by beneficiary designations may still need probate. The petition is a tool to limit probate exposure for assets that the trustmaker intended to fund into the trust.
Title companies sometimes accept a certification of trust and supporting documents for noncontroversial transfers, but acceptance is not guaranteed. Some institutions are satisfied with a properly drafted certification of trust that identifies the trustee and confirms authority, particularly when the recorded title and trust documentation are straightforward. In those circumstances, administrative transfer may proceed without a court order if all parties accept the evidence presented by the trustee. When title companies or lenders require more assurance, a recorded court order from a Heggstad petition provides the definitive authority they need to clear title. If a title company is hesitant or refuses to record a transfer based solely on documentation, pursuing the court order is often the most reliable option to satisfy institutional requirements and complete the transaction securely.
If beneficiaries or other interested parties contest a Heggstad petition, the matter may become a contested proceeding that requires additional evidence and legal argument. Contesting parties might dispute the trustmaker’s intent, challenge the authenticity of documents, or assert competing claims to the property. In contested matters, the court evaluates the totality of the evidence, considers witness declarations, and hears argument from both sides before reaching a determination about ownership. Contested proceedings typically extend the timeline and increase costs, but they also provide a forum for fully resolving disputes and creating a definitive record. Early engagement with potential objectors and efforts to narrow issues through stipulation or negotiation can sometimes limit contention. When agreement is not possible, preparing thorough evidence and presenting a clear factual narrative at hearing gives the court what it needs to decide the matter fairly.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include negotiating with title companies or lenders to accept a certification of trust, executing and recording corrective deeds if possible, or using probate processes such as a limited probate proceeding to transfer the asset. Where parties are cooperative and documentation is compelling, administrative resolution may be feasible without court intervention. Executors or trustees may also explore settlement agreements with heirs to resolve ownership questions privately. However, these alternatives depend on third-party cooperation and the absence of disputes. When title companies or lenders insist on a court order, or when disputes among beneficiaries are likely to persist, a formal petition remains the most reliable method to secure a binding determination and facilitate clean recording of title in the trustee’s name.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on case complexity, court filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation generally cost less because they require less court time and fewer attorney hours to prepare. Fees include filing and service costs and any fees for obtaining copies of records or hiring professionals to provide supporting declarations. Discussing specific circumstances with counsel helps estimate anticipated expenses for the filing and recording steps. Contested matters that involve discovery, additional hearings, or complex title research can increase costs. When a dispute arises, additional attorney time is needed to gather evidence, prepare witnesses, and present the case in court. Many clients weigh these costs against the value of obtaining clarity and avoiding future disputes, and in many cases the benefit of a final court order justifies the expense associated with the petition process.
A trustee’s ability to sell property before a Heggstad petition is resolved depends on the trustee’s documented authority and on third-party requirements. If the property remains recorded in the decedent’s name and title companies or buyers require clear trust title for closing, a sale may not be possible without a court order or acceptable alternative documentation. Trustees should avoid attempting sales that could expose them to liability for acting without clear authority until the title issue is resolved. In some cases, where third parties accept certifications of trust and supporting evidence, transactions can proceed without a court order. However, when institutional requirements or buyer concerns prevent a sale, obtaining a Heggstad order ensures the trustee can complete the transaction with clear, recorded authority and reduces the risk of post-closing disputes over ownership or authority.
To begin the Heggstad petition process in Mecca, collect the trust document and any documents related to the asset in question, including deeds, correspondence, escrow records, or relevant financial statements. Gather names and contact information for interested parties and potential witnesses who can testify about the trustmaker’s intentions. Early organization of these materials helps in assessing whether a petition is likely to succeed and what additional evidence may be needed. Contact an attorney or the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to review your documents and discuss next steps. An initial case assessment typically involves identifying evidence gaps, preparing declarations, and outlining the petition and service requirements. From there, the attorneys can prepare the petition for filing, manage service and court communication, and guide you through any necessary hearings and post-order recording to resolve the title issue.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas