A Heggstad petition is a focused probate procedure used when a decedent intended that certain assets be held in a trust but title was never formally transferred. In Palm Desert and throughout Riverside County, this petition asks the court to recognize that those assets were meant to belong to an existing trust, often simplifying administration and protecting beneficiaries’ interests. Many families encounter this issue after a loved one passes, when bank accounts, deeds, or investment accounts remain solely in the decedent’s name. This introduction explains what a Heggstad petition does, why it may be appropriate, and how it can integrate with common estate planning documents like pour-over wills and revocable living trusts.
Navigating a Heggstad petition involves gathering documentary evidence that demonstrates the decedent’s intent to fund a trust and proving that the trust instrument existed at the relevant time. Typical supporting materials include trust agreements, beneficiary designations, drafts or copies of trust documents, statements from financial institutions, deeds, and correspondence showing the decedent’s intent. In some cases, the court will require a hearing where testimony and affidavits support the claim. Understanding this process ahead of time can reduce delay and uncertainty for heirs and fiduciaries, and helps determine whether the petition is the best route compared to other post-death probate or trust administration options.
A Heggstad petition can streamline estate administration by clarifying ownership of assets that should have been in a trust, potentially avoiding lengthy probate for those specific items. The petition helps ensure that assets are distributed under the terms of the trust, consistent with the decedent’s wishes, which may protect beneficiaries and reduce disputes. It also can preserve the privacy benefits of trust administration compared with full probate. For fiduciaries and family members, pursuing a Heggstad petition early can limit creditor claims and allow efficient transfer of accounts, deeds, and other property to the trustee for eventual distribution in accordance with the trust instrument.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning and trust administration representation for Palm Desert and Riverside County clients, assisting with matters such as Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and pour-over wills. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, thorough evidence collection, and clear communication with trustees and family members to resolve transfer issues efficiently. We work with fiduciaries to prepare court filings, coordinate with banks and title companies, and present factual support to the court to confirm that assets belong in a trust. Clients benefit from practical guidance on next steps after a petition resolves title concerns.
A Heggstad petition is appropriate when property intended to be held in a trust was left in the decedent’s name due to oversight or delayed transfer. The court examines whether the decedent intended the property to be governed by the trust at death, often by reviewing the trust document, related deeds, account statements, and other communications. This process is fact-driven and can involve affidavits from witnesses or declarations from persons familiar with the decedent’s intentions. Successfully proving the connection allows the asset to be treated as trust property, which can simplify distribution under the trust terms and minimize the need for full probate for those items.
Not every asset discrepancy requires a Heggstad petition. Some issues resolve by presenting bank forms, beneficiary designations, or corrected deeds to institutions holding the property. When documents are ambiguous or institutions refuse to accept trust status without a court order, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial determination. The process typically involves filing a petition, serving interested parties, presenting documentary evidence, and possibly attending a hearing. Outcomes can include the court declaring the asset as part of the trust or ordering the asset transferred to the trustee, enabling distribution consistent with the trust instrument and reducing uncertainty for heirs and fiduciaries.
The Heggstad petition asks a court to find that a particular asset was intended to be held in a trust even though formal title was never changed. Named after a specific California case, this petition relies on evidence showing the decedent’s intent, such as a trust agreement, contemporaneous transfers, or documentation reflecting the trust’s ownership. The goal is to have the court declare the property to be trust property so the trustee can manage and distribute it under the trust’s terms. This remedy can be essential when institutions or third parties demand a court order before recognizing the trustee’s authority over accounts or titled assets left in the decedent’s name.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on clear documentary support and a coherent factual narrative showing the decedent’s intent. Key elements include the trust instrument itself, account statements or deeds reflecting the asset, communications or instructions indicating intent to fund the trust, and any evidence of attempted transfers. The process involves preparing a petition to the probate court, serving interested parties, submitting declarations and exhibits, and responding to any objections. The court will evaluate whether the evidence establishes that the asset should be treated as trust property for administration and distribution purposes under the trust.
Understanding common terms helps trustees, beneficiaries, and family members navigate a Heggstad petition. Definitions clarify what the court will review when deciding whether property belongs to a trust and explain roles like trustee, beneficiary, petitioner, and interested parties. Familiarity with terms such as pour-over will, revocable living trust, trustee’s duties, and conveyance documents helps reduce confusion during the petition process. This section provides concise explanations of those terms, helping readers know what evidence to gather and what to expect from the probate court when assets are claimed as trust property.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement created during an individual’s lifetime to hold and manage property for the benefit of named beneficiaries. The trust document establishes a trustee to administer assets according to the settlor’s instructions. Owners commonly use revocable living trusts to avoid probate for assets properly titled in the trust’s name, to manage affairs in the event of incapacity, and to provide clear distribution instructions upon death. When an asset intended for a trust remains in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition may be used to confirm the asset’s inclusion in the trust for administration purposes.
A pour-over will complements a trust by directing any assets not already transferred into the trust at death to be distributed to the trust. In practice, the pour-over will helps ensure that forgotten or newly acquired assets will ultimately fall under the trust’s terms. However, assets passing through a pour-over will still typically go through probate before entering the trust, which can delay distribution. A Heggstad petition can sometimes avoid probate for specific assets by establishing they were intended for the trust prior to death, despite being titled in the decedent’s name at the time of death.
The trustee is the person or entity appointed under the trust document to hold legal title to trust assets, manage investments, pay debts and expenses, and distribute trust property to beneficiaries according to the trust’s instructions. When property remains in the decedent’s name, the trustee may need a court declaration to assume control of that asset. A Heggstad petition, if granted, affirms the trustee’s authority over the asset so it can be managed and distributed without full probate administration for that particular property, aligning administration with the trust’s terms and fiduciary duties.
Declarations, affidavits, and documentary evidence form the backbone of a Heggstad petition, demonstrating the decedent’s intent to place assets in a trust. Common evidence includes copies of the trust instrument, bank or brokerage statements, deeds, correspondence, and witness statements. Declarations from persons knowledgeable about the decedent’s intent help clarify ambiguous situations. The court weighs this evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property, and careful preparation of declarations and exhibits increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling that aligns asset title with the decedent’s estate plan.
When an asset remains in a decedent’s name, there are several ways to proceed: request the institution to accept trust documentation, pursue a Heggstad petition, or administer the asset through probate. Requesting institutional acceptance can be quick when clear documentation exists, but institutions sometimes require a court order. Probate may be necessary for broader estate administration. A Heggstad petition is a narrower remedy that seeks court recognition of trust ownership for particular assets, potentially avoiding probate for those items. The right choice depends on the strength of available evidence, the willingness of third parties to cooperate, and the family’s goals for timely transfer and confidentiality.
If a bank, title company, or brokerage accepts a copy of the trust document and associated account forms, the asset can often be transferred to the trustee without court intervention, which can save time and expense. This occurs when documentation is clear, signatures match records, and the institution has internal procedures to re-title accounts or deeds. In such cases, the trustee coordinates directly with the institution, submitting identification, trust provisions, and completed transfer forms. When institutions cooperate, families can often avoid the delay of filings and hearings, though careful record-keeping remains important to prevent future disputes.
Sometimes assets pass outside of probate through beneficiary designations or payable-on-death designations, which do not require a Heggstad petition if documentation shows the intended transfer. When designation forms are properly completed and accepted by institutions, the asset will pass according to those instructions. Similarly, deeds that reflect the trust as grantee can be recorded if the title company accepts documents. When transfer paperwork is unambiguous and can be processed administratively, families may resolve ownership issues without filing a petition in probate court, saving time and expense while accomplishing the transfer.
Banks, title companies, and other institutions sometimes require a court order before re-titling accounts or transferring property to a trustee, especially when records are incomplete or the institution seeks legal certainty. In these situations, filing a Heggstad petition provides the formal judicial declaration needed to satisfy third parties, avoid prolonged disputes, and allow the trustee to assume control. Preparing a petition requires attention to evidentiary standards and procedural rules, and achieving a favorable result can streamline administration of the estate for the benefit of all interested parties.
When heirs or other interested persons challenge the claim that an asset belonged to a trust, or when documentary evidence is ambiguous, a Heggstad petition brings the matter before the court for resolution. Court proceedings allow the judge to evaluate testimony, weigh declarations, and review exhibits to reach a binding decision. This route can reduce uncertainty and provide a definitive path forward for administration. While a court process may take longer than voluntary transfers, it can prevent further litigation and clarify trustee authority, resulting in more predictable estate administration.
A comprehensive approach to resolving title issues combines careful document review, targeted negotiation with institutions, and readiness to file a Heggstad petition if needed. This method helps ensure that all available evidence is gathered and presented persuasively, increasing the chance of a favorable outcome whether the matter is resolved administratively or in court. By preparing the factual record and exploring institutional processes first, fiduciaries can limit delays and reduce the risk of contested litigation, while still having the option to seek a judicial determination when necessary.
Taking a rounded approach also protects beneficiaries by promoting transparent communication, timely asset management, and consistent application of trust terms. When trustees are proactive, creditors can be addressed promptly and distributions can proceed once title is resolved. Careful preparation for a Heggstad petition often uncovers additional estate administration issues that can be handled concurrently, reducing multiple rounds of legal work. Overall, the combination of administrative attempts and court readiness supports efficient resolution and aligns asset transfers with the decedent’s documented intentions.
A comprehensive strategy can cut the time needed to get assets into trustee control by first seeking institutional cooperation and preparing strong documentation for court use if necessary. Early engagement with banks and title companies, combined with well-organized exhibits and declarations, helps avoid repeated requests for information and minimizes procedural setbacks. When a petition becomes necessary, having that groundwork already assembled often speeds court consideration, reduces the need for hearings, and allows trustees to proceed with managing and distributing assets consistent with the trust’s provisions more efficiently.
Comprehensive preparation clarifies likely outcomes and reduces risks of future disputes by ensuring the record demonstrates the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This clarity helps trustees and beneficiaries make informed decisions, anticipate potential objections, and address challenges proactively. A well-prepared case for a Heggstad petition also limits the potential for additional litigation by resolving title questions definitively. Beneficiaries gain confidence when transfers occur in a transparent, documented manner that aligns with the trust instrument and applicable law.
Begin by collecting all documents that show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust: the trust agreement, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and any correspondence indicating intent. Also gather copies of any attempted transfers and records from financial institutions. Clear, chronological organization of documents and a concise summary of events help the court and opposing parties understand the basis for the petition. Early evidence collection reduces the risk of surprise requests later and improves the chance that a court will find the asset belonged to the trust at the relevant time.
When filing a Heggstad petition, carefully prepared declarations and exhibits are essential. Include a timeline of events, explanations for why the asset remained in the decedent’s name, and statements from persons familiar with the decedent’s intent. Declarations should be factual and avoid speculation, focusing on documentary support and firsthand knowledge. Well-structured declarations reduce the need for extensive hearings and help the court evaluate the claim efficiently, promoting a timely result that aligns the asset’s title with the trust’s terms.
Consider a Heggstad petition when important assets remain in the decedent’s name after death and those assets were meant to be administered under a trust. This situation often arises with real property, bank accounts, or investment accounts where transfers were intended but not completed. The petition helps ensure the asset is managed and distributed according to the trust, which can protect beneficiaries’ interests and preserve the settlor’s intent. When institutions demand a court order or when evidence is not accepted administratively, a petition provides the formal determination necessary to move forward.
Families may also pursue a Heggstad petition to avoid full probate for particular assets, preserve privacy, and accelerate distributions to beneficiaries. Where disputes among heirs arise regarding ownership or trust intent, the petition offers a clear legal pathway to resolve conflicts through court review. Acting early, documenting intent, and consulting with counsel familiar with trust administration and probate procedures in Riverside County can help fiduciaries determine whether this petition best serves the estate’s interests and the family’s goals for timely resolution.
Typical circumstances include transfers that were started but not completed before death, deeds showing ownership in the decedent rather than the trust, bank or brokerage accounts still titled in the decedent’s name, and newly acquired assets not transferred into the trust. Other situations involve institutions refusing to accept trust documentation without a court order or disagreements among heirs about where assets belong. Recognizing these common scenarios early allows trustees to collect evidence and decide whether a Heggstad petition or another procedure will most effectively resolve the title issue.
When a deed was never recorded in the trust’s name, real property can remain titled to the decedent even though they intended the property to be part of the trust. Title companies and counties may require a court order to transfer ownership, making a Heggstad petition a practical method to confirm trust ownership. The petition typically includes the trust document, any purchase or transfer records, and evidence of the decedent’s intent to include the property in the trust. Resolving the title ensures the trustee can manage or sell the property consistent with the trust’s directions.
Bank and brokerage accounts sometimes remain in an individual’s name due to oversight, inactivity, or institutional requirements. When account paperwork or beneficiary designations are unclear, institutions may refuse to transfer assets to a trustee without a court order. A Heggstad petition provides the probate court’s declaration that the asset belonged to the trust, allowing the trustee to access and manage funds for estate expenses and beneficiary distributions. Gathering account statements and communications showing intent can strengthen the petition and expedite the transfer process.
Assets acquired shortly before death or items overlooked during trust funding often remain in the decedent’s name and may not be covered by beneficiary designations or other transfer mechanisms. These overlooked assets can create gaps in administration unless addressed. A Heggstad petition can demonstrate that, despite the lack of formal transfer, the decedent intended those assets to be part of the trust. Addressing these gaps helps ensure that distributions follow the trust’s terms and minimizes the need for additional probate proceedings for those specific items.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Palm Desert families and trustees with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters in Riverside County. We help identify whether a court petition is necessary, gather the documents and declarations required to support a claim, and coordinate with financial institutions and title companies. Our services include drafting the petition, filing with the probate court, serving interested parties, and presenting the factual record to obtain a judicial determination that aligns asset title with the trust. We aim to provide clear guidance to reduce delays and keep the process moving.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful handling of trust-related transfer issues because we focus on thorough preparation, clear communication, and practical solutions. We review trust documents and supporting materials to determine the best pathway, whether that means negotiating with institutions or filing a petition in probate court. Our goal is to achieve timely recognition of trust ownership so trustees can manage assets and beneficiaries can receive distributions with minimal delay. We emphasize organized records and transparent steps so families understand each phase of the process.
When a petition is necessary, our filings clearly state the factual basis for the requested relief and include the declarations and exhibits needed to support the claim. We coordinate service on interested parties and respond to inquiries or objections, advocating for a resolution that aligns with the decedent’s documented intentions. By preparing a comprehensive evidentiary record, we aim to reduce the need for protracted hearings and help the court reach a prompt decision, enabling trustees to proceed with administration in accordance with the trust.
We also assist clients with related documents commonly encountered in estate administration, such as pour-over wills, trust modification petitions, and certification of trust documents. Whether the issue involves a single account or multiple titled assets, we work to clarify title, preserve estate value, and minimize administrative burdens. Our methods emphasize proactive document gathering and consistent communication with institutions and family members so the estate’s affairs progress smoothly toward distribution under the trust.
Our process begins with a focused evaluation of the trust document, relevant asset records, and communications about intended transfers. We identify the strongest evidence supporting the asset’s inclusion in the trust, organize declarations and exhibits, and then attempt administrative resolution with institutions where appropriate. If a court order is needed, we prepare and file a Heggstad petition in the appropriate Riverside County probate department, serve interested parties, and present the documentary record to the court. Throughout, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed and coordinate necessary next steps following the court’s decision.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust agreement, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any communications indicating the decedent’s intent. We compile a timeline of relevant events and identify witnesses or individuals who can provide declarations supporting the claim. Properly organized evidence and a clear factual narrative strengthen the position whether resolving the matter administratively or seeking a judicial declaration. This preparatory work reduces later procedural delays and positions the trustee to proceed efficiently with either institutional transfers or a court petition.
We locate and review the trust instrument and related estate planning documents to confirm the terms and trustee appointment. This includes checking for pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and HIPAA authorizations that may reveal intent and assist in administration. Verification of the trust’s execution date and the settlor’s instructions helps demonstrate that an asset should have been in the trust. Collecting accurate copies and noting key provisions is essential for both institutional requests and court filings, and it forms the backbone of any submission seeking recognition of trust ownership.
We prepare declarations and exhibits that document attempts to transfer assets, communications with institutions, and other evidence of intent to fund the trust. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who observed the decedent’s planning can clarify circumstances. The assembled record typically includes account statements, deeds, letters, and any attempted transfer forms. A well-organized evidentiary packet helps institutions review requests more readily and supports the petition if a court filing becomes necessary, leading to a clearer and more persuasive presentation of the facts.
After preparing the evidence, we first approach financial institutions and title companies with a request to accept trust documentation and re-title the asset. If institutions accept the documentation, the matter can be resolved without court involvement. When institutions decline or when interested parties contest the claim, we prepare and file a Heggstad petition in the probate court, including declarations and exhibits that support the trust ownership claim. Filing initiates a formal court process that culminates in a judicial determination if contested or if institutional cooperation is not obtained.
We present the trust document and supporting evidence to institutions and request that accounts or deeds be transferred to the trustee. This step often resolves the issue when records are clear and the institution’s internal policies permit administrative transfers. We document all communications and follow up as needed, seeking written confirmation of acceptance. Successful administrative transfers avoid court involvement and allow trustees to manage assets more quickly, but we prepare for filing if the institution requires a judicial order for title recognition.
If administrative efforts fail, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate probate court in Riverside County and serve all interested parties according to legal requirements. The filing includes a clear statement of facts, the relevant trust provisions, and supporting declarations and exhibits. Serving parties gives them notice and an opportunity to respond, and it ensures the court has a complete picture of who may be affected by the requested relief. Timely and accurate service supports the court’s ability to consider the petition promptly.
Once the petition is filed and served, the court will review the record, consider any objections, and may hold a hearing to evaluate the evidence. If the judge finds that the asset was intended to be held in the trust, the court will enter an order declaring the property to be trust property or directing the necessary transfer to the trustee. Following the order, the trustee can provide the court’s decision to institutions as authority to re-title accounts or record deeds, allowing the trustee to manage and distribute the asset in accordance with the trust instrument.
During a hearing, the court reviews declarations, exhibits, and any testimony to determine whether the evidence supports treating the asset as trust property. The hearing gives interested parties an opportunity to be heard and for the petitioner to respond to challenges. A clear, well-documented record typically shortens hearing time and improves the court’s ability to issue a decisive order. The goal is a written judicial determination that the trustee may exercise authority over the asset consistent with the trust’s terms, enabling efficient administration thereafter.
After the court issues an order, the trustee uses the judgment to present institutions and county recorders with authority to transfer accounts or record deeds in the trust’s name. We assist trustees in preparing the documentation required by banks or title companies to effectuate the transfer and ensure compliance with any court conditions. Once transferred, the asset is subject to the trust’s management and distribution provisions, and trustees can proceed with paying debts, expenses, and distributions to beneficiaries as directed by the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize that assets held in the decedent’s name were intended to be held in an existing trust. The petition requests a judicial declaration that the property should be treated as trust property so the trustee can manage and distribute it according to the trust instrument. This remedy is typically used when title was never formally transferred to the trust before death and institutions refuse to accept trust documents without a court order. The petition relies on evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, such as the trust document, deeds, statements, and communications. If the court grants the petition, the trustee receives a formal order that institutions will accept as authority to transfer or re-title assets. This process provides certainty about ownership and helps ensure distributions follow the trust’s provisions rather than default probate pathways.
Timing varies based on the complexity of the case, the court’s schedule in Riverside County, whether institutions cooperate, and whether objections are filed. Simple matters where institutions accept documentation may resolve in a few weeks if administrative transfers are possible. If a petition must be filed and no objections are raised, the process can proceed more quickly, though court calendars and required notice periods still affect timing. When objections occur or discovery is needed, the proceeding can take several months. Preparing a thorough evidentiary record and attempting administrative resolution before filing can reduce delays. Prompt service to interested parties and clear declarations help the court evaluate the petition efficiently and reach a decision sooner.
Supporting evidence includes a copy of the trust instrument showing the settlor’s intent and the trustee designation, deeds or account statements reflecting ownership, correspondence or forms indicating attempts to transfer assets, and declarations from individuals who can attest to the decedent’s intent. A timeline of events and documentation of communications with financial institutions or title companies also strengthens the petition. Affidavits or declarations from the trustee or others with firsthand knowledge can explain why the asset remained in the decedent’s name. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence, so organized, contemporaneous documents and clear witness statements increase the likelihood of a favorable declaration that the asset belonged to the trust.
Access to funds while a petition is pending depends on institutional policies and the specifics of the case. Some banks may allow limited access for necessary estate expenses if provided with appropriate documentation and court filings, while others may require a court order before releasing funds. Trustees should document requests and any limitations imposed by institutions to ensure proper handling of estate obligations. If immediate access is essential and institutions refuse, the trustee may seek temporary orders or emergency relief from the court. The court can authorize limited access in certain circumstances to pay funeral expenses, taxes, or bills, but such relief requires clear justification and supporting declarations demonstrating the need and the trustee’s authority under the trust.
A Heggstad petition can prevent probate for particular assets by obtaining a judicial declaration that those assets were trust property at the time of death. When successful, the order allows those items to be transferred to the trustee and administered according to the trust, avoiding full probate for those assets. However, not every estate issue will be resolved by a Heggstad petition, particularly if multiple assets or complex creditor claims exist that require broader probate administration. If significant assets are unrelated to the trust or if disputes involve broad estate issues, some probate proceedings may still be necessary. The petition is a targeted remedy focused on specific assets, and its effectiveness in avoiding probate depends on the totality of the estate plan and the nature of outstanding obligations or disputes.
Interested parties typically include heirs, beneficiaries, the trustee, and known creditors who might be affected by the court’s determination. California probate rules require serving those with a legal interest in the outcome so they can object or appear. Proper service and notice ensure the court’s order is binding and reduce the risk of later challenges based on inadequate notice. The petitioner must follow statutory procedures for service and proof of service, and the court often requires that notice be published or mailed to certain parties. Careful identification and notification of interested parties is essential to move the matter forward and obtain a definitive court ruling without future procedural defects.
Alternatives include requesting that institutions accept trust documentation and re-title accounts administratively, using beneficiary designations or pay-on-death forms where available, or pursuing a full probate if broader estate administration is warranted. In some cases, simple corrective deeds or affidavits accepted by title companies can resolve real property issues without filing a petition. Exploring administrative remedies first can save time and expense. If institutions decline administrative remedies, mediation or negotiation with other interested parties may resolve disputes. When those options fail, a Heggstad petition remains a focused judicial path to confirm trust ownership for particular items, while broader estate issues can be addressed through other probate proceedings as needed.
Yes, heirs or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition by filing objections or appearing at the hearing. When objections are raised, the court may require additional evidence, testimony, or briefing to resolve factual disputes. Contested matters take longer and may involve discovery or cross-examination, but the court will ultimately evaluate the evidence and issue a ruling based on the legal standards governing trust ownership. When disputes escalate, the judge’s decision determines whether the asset is treated as trust property. If the petition is denied, the trustee and beneficiaries must consider other administration routes, which may include probate for that asset. Clear documentation and credible declarations prior to filing help reduce the risk of successful challenges and lead to a more predictable outcome.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves court filing fees, service costs, and potential attorney fees for preparing the petition, declarations, and exhibits. Fees vary by county and the complexity of the case. Additional costs can arise if hearings are required, if expert testimony is engaged, or if extensive discovery or responses to objections are necessary. Institutions may also charge fees for document requests or processing transfers. We recommend budgeting for filing and service costs and discussing fee arrangements early. In some cases, the reduction in probate time and costs for the affected assets outweighs the expense of a petition. Detailed planning and an initial evaluation of likely costs can help fiduciaries and families make informed decisions about whether to proceed.
To begin, gather the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that shows the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Make a list of institutions and assets that remain in the decedent’s name. Contact the institution to learn their requirements for recognizing trust ownership. Early organization of these materials allows for a quicker assessment of whether an administrative transfer is feasible or whether filing a petition will be necessary. If it appears a petition may be needed, contact a Palm Desert trust and probate attorney to review your documents, advise on the likelihood of success, and prepare the necessary declarations and court filings. Timely action, careful documentation, and proper notice to interested parties help the matter proceed efficiently, reducing delays in transferring assets into trustee control and distributing to beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas