A trust modification petition allows a settlor or beneficiary to request changes to an existing trust when circumstances change or when the original trust provisions no longer reflect current needs. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Palm Desert and Riverside County evaluate whether a petition to modify a trust is appropriate, how state law applies, and what outcomes are realistic. This page outlines the process, key terms, and practical considerations so you can make informed choices about modifying a trust, protecting family assets, and ensuring your intent is honored under California law.
When life events such as remarriage, changing tax rules, incapacity, or an error in the original trust document occur, a trust modification petition may be necessary to update trust terms. In many scenarios, modifications preserve the grantor’s intent while adapting to new realities. Our Palm Desert practice guides clients through the procedural steps and legal standards that govern modifications in California, helping you weigh alternatives and potential risks. We discuss administrative options, court petitions, and settlement possibilities so you can choose the path that best protects beneficiaries and trust assets.
Filing a trust modification petition can prevent future disputes, clarify distributions, and address unanticipated tax or family developments. By updating the trust to match present intentions, families avoid ambiguity that often leads to litigation among beneficiaries. A properly prepared petition can also correct drafting mistakes or incorporate changed circumstances like the need for long-term care provisions. The benefits include clearer administration, better asset protection for intended recipients, and reduced friction during trust administration, which can ultimately save time and money while preserving family relationships and the settlor’s overall estate planning objectives.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to residents across California, including Palm Desert and Riverside County. Our firm handles a range of trust matters, from drafting living trusts to filing trust modification petitions and related petitions such as Heggstad and trust modification petitions. We focus on clear communication, practical solutions, and careful preparation of paperwork and court filings to pursue outcomes that reflect clients’ intentions. Clients benefit from personalized attention, thorough case analysis, and a steady process for resolving complex family and legal issues surrounding trusts.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to change, amend, or terminate provisions of an existing trust when informal methods are not possible or appropriate. California law permits certain modifications after considering the settlor’s intent, the interests of beneficiaries, and public policy. Options include judicial reformation for mistake or ambiguity, modification due to changed circumstances, or termination when the trust purpose is fulfilled. Understanding the legal framework and evidentiary standards is essential to determine whether a petition is the right course of action and how to present a compelling, legally sound case.
Before filing a petition, it is important to explore alternatives such as trustee-directed amendments when the trust document allows, or family agreements between beneficiaries and trustees. When those avenues are impractical, a court petition can provide a binding resolution. The process involves filing pleadings, serving interested parties, and possibly submitting declarations and documentary evidence demonstrating why modification is warranted. Courts will weigh equitable considerations alongside statutory requirements, so careful preparation and thoughtful presentation of facts and legal arguments are central to achieving a beneficial outcome.
A trust modification petition is a request presented to a probate or superior court asking for changes to the terms or administration of a trust. Such petitions are used when parties cannot accomplish necessary adjustments through the trust’s amendment provisions or when clarity is needed because of ambiguity, mistake, or changed circumstances. The court assesses whether the requested change aligns with legal standards and the trust settlor’s probable intent. Filing a petition is often necessary to ensure the change is legally binding, protects beneficiaries’ rights, and provides a clear directive for trustees and successor trustees to follow.
A successful petition generally requires establishing standing, articulating the legal basis for modification, and offering factual support through declarations and exhibits. Required steps include preparing the petition, serving notice to beneficiaries and interested parties, and complying with local court rules and timelines. The pleadings should explain why administrative changes are insufficient and why the proposed modification promotes the settlor’s intent or serves justice. Mediation or settlement discussions often occur before or after filing, and if the matter proceeds to hearing, clear presentation of evidence and legal authorities will guide the court’s decision.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients navigate the process with greater confidence. Key terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, Heggstad petition, pour-over will, and certification of trust, among others. Familiarity with these concepts clarifies roles and potential remedies when changes are needed. This section provides concise definitions and practical notes to help you recognize when a particular remedy applies and how those remedies interact with broader estate planning tools like revocable living trusts, power of attorney documents, and advance health care directives.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor or trustor, is the person who creates the trust and sets its terms. The trustee is the person or entity responsible for administering trust assets according to those terms and for the benefit of beneficiaries. In trust modification proceedings, the settlor’s intent is central, whether the settlor is alive or the trust is irrevocable after death. When the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, the trustee, beneficiaries, or successor trustees may petition the court to address ambiguities, mistakes, or changed circumstances that affect proper administration and distribution.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered change to a trust document to correct a mistake or to reflect the settlor’s true intent when the written instrument does not match what was intended. Modification is a broader category encompassing changes requested for changed circumstances or to address unforeseen issues. Petitioners must supply evidence supporting the need for reformation or modification, such as contemporaneous documents, witness declarations, or proof of changed circumstances that make the original terms impractical or contrary to the settlor’s objectives.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to include certain assets in a trust despite the assets not being formally titled in the trust’s name, often because they were intended to be part of the trust but transfer steps were not completed. Related filings can include trust modification petitions, petitions for trust administration instructions, and petitions to settle disputes among beneficiaries. These procedures help ensure that assets are distributed according to the settlor’s plan, minimize estate tax complications, and provide a clear path for trustees to manage and distribute trust property.
A pour-over will ensures that assets not already transferred to a trust during the settlor’s lifetime are transferred to the trust at death for distribution under trust terms. A certification of trust is a summary document that provides key trust information to third parties without revealing the entire trust instrument. Both documents often work in tandem with trusts and may be relevant during trust modification proceedings when clarifying how assets were intended to be handled or when demonstrating the broader estate plan that supports a requested modification.
When considering changes to a trust, there are several avenues to explore before filing a court petition. Informal alternatives include trustee-initiated amendments permitted by the trust document or agreements among beneficiaries that resolve disputes without judicial intervention. Mediation and negotiation can also resolve many issues. Compare these options with a court petition, which provides a definitive legal resolution and is appropriate when parties cannot agree or when legal standards require judicial approval. Each option carries trade-offs in terms of cost, time, privacy, and finality, so selecting the right approach requires careful consideration.
If the trust instrument includes clear amendment provisions and the grantor is able to act, many changes can be made without court involvement. Amendment clauses often provide a straightforward process for updating distribution provisions, trustees, or administrative powers. When parties are in agreement and the trust language permits modification, an amendment can be faster and less costly than a court petition. This approach preserves privacy and avoids the formalities of litigation, provided that amendments are properly executed, witnessed, and compliant with California law to avoid future disputes among beneficiaries.
When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree on a change, they can often implement amendments through written agreements or through trustee actions authorized by the trust document. This collaborative approach reduces expense and preserves relationships by avoiding adversarial proceedings. However, documenting the agreement carefully is essential to prevent later disagreements. Properly drafted amendments and consents should clearly record the reasons for the change, the scope of adjustments, and any continuing obligations, ensuring enforceability and minimizing the risk that a later party will challenge the alteration.
When beneficiaries dispute the meaning of trust language, when the settlor’s intentions are unclear, or when allegations of mistake or improper conduct arise, a court petition may be the only way to obtain a binding resolution that clarifies rights and duties. Judicial intervention can correct drafting errors, determine which assets belong to the trust, or modify terms that are impractical or impossible to carry out. The court process provides legal authority and enforceable orders that guide trustees and beneficiaries and reduce the potential for ongoing or future litigation.
When the settlor is incapacitated or unable to act, or when trust assets include complex holdings such as business interests, retirement plan assets, or property with unclear title, a petition can resolve ownership and administration questions. Courts can authorize specific actions, interpret ambiguous provisions, and direct trustees on how to handle challenging situations. These formal actions provide certainty for third parties and financial institutions and allow trustees to manage the trust without fear of later personal liability for decisions made in good faith under a court order.
A comprehensive approach evaluates the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, tax implications, and family dynamics before proceeding. This broad review helps identify potential obstacles and opportunities to achieve the settlor’s objectives while minimizing unintended consequences. A thorough analysis can recommend whether to pursue an amendment, a negotiated settlement, or a court petition. Taking this approach often results in clearer, more durable outcomes, reducing the likelihood of subsequent litigation and ensuring that trustee actions align with both the trust document and applicable law.
Addressing all relevant issues, including pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and related trust documents, prevents piecemeal changes that leave gaps in an estate plan. A comprehensive process anticipates follow-up steps such as retitling assets, updating beneficiary designations, and creating certifications of trust for third parties. This forward-looking planning helps preserve family harmony and ensures that the administrative consequences of any modification are carried out effectively, safeguarding assets and clarifying the roles of trustees and beneficiaries alike.
By addressing ambiguities, correcting errors, and aligning the trust with current circumstances, a comprehensive process diminishes the grounds for future disputes among beneficiaries. Clear documentation, court-approved modifications when needed, and coordinated updates to related estate planning documents all contribute to long-term stability. This proactive stance often preserves family relationships and prevents the high costs, delays, and emotional strain that accompany contested trust litigation, allowing trustees to administer assets with confidence and beneficiaries to receive distributions according to an orderly plan.
When a trust is clear, properly documented, and adjusted to reflect current realities, administration becomes more straightforward. Trustees can follow defined instructions without prolonged uncertainty or repeated court involvement, leading to timely distributions and efficient asset management. Comprehensive planning also ensures that essential documents like certification of trust and pour-over wills complement any modifications, so banks, financial institutions, and title companies readily accept trustee authority. The result is a smoother transition for beneficiaries and reduced administrative burden on trustees.
Gathering all relevant trust documents, amendments, beneficiary designations, property deeds, and related estate planning materials at the outset helps streamline any petition or amendment process. Documentation that shows the settlor’s intent, prior drafts, or communications about the trust can be especially helpful when seeking reformation or modification. Early collection of evidence reduces delays, supports clear legal arguments, and enables timely communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and the court, preventing surprises that can prolong resolution and increase costs.
Before making changes, review related documents like pourover wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and beneficiary designations to ensure consistency across the entire plan. A change to a trust provision may require updates to other instruments and asset retitling to achieve the intended result. Taking a holistic approach reduces the risk that assets will fall outside the trust, avoids unintended tax or administrative consequences, and ensures that the settlor’s comprehensive plan continues to function as intended for family members and other beneficiaries.
You might consider a trust modification petition when the existing trust no longer matches family circumstances, when a drafting mistake needs correction, or when asset ownership issues prevent proper trust administration. Other reasons include changes in tax law, the need to provide for a beneficiary with special needs, or to address unforeseen events such as divorce, remarriage, or the death of a named beneficiary. Petitioning the court can create a clear, enforceable resolution that aligns trust administration with the settlor’s actual intentions and current family needs.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to clarify trustee powers or to obtain court instructions when trustees face conflicting demands from beneficiaries or uncertainty about how to follow trust terms. In cases involving complex assets, retirement accounts, or business interests, judicial guidance can determine the best path forward. Pursuing a formal process may also protect trustees from personal exposure for actions taken under court orders and provides a stable framework for managing and distributing trust assets in accordance with legal standards and the settlor’s goals.
Common circumstances prompting petitions include ambiguous trust language, mistakes in drafting, assets left out of the trust, beneficiaries contesting distributions, and changes in family structure or financial circumstances. Other triggers involve a trustee’s inability to act due to incapacity or conflicts of interest, or the discovery of assets that were intended to be included but never transferred. Recognizing these scenarios early allows parties to decide whether informal corrections, beneficiary agreements, or court petitions will best achieve fair and durable results.
Ambiguous wording or drafting mistakes in a trust instrument often lead to disagreements over intent and distribution. If the language can be reasonably interpreted in multiple ways, beneficiaries or trustees may seek judicial clarification to avoid inconsistent administration. A petition that documents evidence of the settlor’s intended meaning and explains why the ambiguity causes practical harm can persuade a court to reform the trust. Correcting these defects protects beneficiaries’ interests and supports orderly trust administration in alignment with what the settlor likely intended.
When assets intended to belong to the trust were never transferred or retitled, a Heggstad petition or similar filing may be necessary to have the court recognize those assets as trust property. This situation can arise due to oversight, timing issues, or complications with title and beneficiary designations. A petition documents the intent to include those assets in the trust and seeks judicial confirmation to allow trustees to manage and distribute the property in accordance with the trust terms, providing certainty for beneficiaries and third parties.
Life changes such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or substantial shifts in financial circumstances can make previously drafted trust provisions inappropriate. A petition to modify the trust may better reflect the settlor’s updated wishes or accommodate practical needs such as new caregiving responsibilities or tax planning adjustments. Courts can consider these changed circumstances when the petition demonstrates that modification serves the trust’s underlying purpose and aligns with equitable considerations, while also protecting beneficiaries’ legal rights.
Serving Palm Desert and the broader Riverside County area, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with trust modification petitions, Heggstad petitions, trust administration matters, and related estate planning needs. We aim to guide clients through the procedural requirements and practical choices involved in modifying trusts, helping to preserve the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiaries. Our local knowledge of court practices and probate procedures supports efficient handling of filings, notices, and hearings in Palm Desert and nearby jurisdictions to secure clear and enforceable outcomes.
Clients seek our services for a careful, client-centered approach to trust matters that balances legal analysis with practical problem solving. We assist with assessing whether informal amendments, beneficiary agreements, or court petitions best address a client’s situation, and we prepare clear pleadings and supporting declarations when court action is necessary. Our goal is to pursue resolutions that protect trustee and beneficiary interests while minimizing conflict, expense, and delay, always focusing on achieving durable solutions aligned with the settlor’s plan and family needs.
We work closely with clients to collect evidence, prepare required notices, and coordinate communication with trustees and beneficiaries, helping to narrow disputed issues and encourage settlements where possible. When matters proceed to court, we provide organized filings and thorough factual presentations to support the requested modification. We also advise on related steps such as asset retitling, updating beneficiary designations, and harmonizing powers of attorney and healthcare directives so that the entire estate plan remains coherent after any modification.
In addition to petition work, our services extend to drafting related estate planning documents including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, advance health care directives, financial powers of attorney, certification of trust forms, and specialized trusts like irrevocable life insurance trusts and special needs trusts. This integrated approach ensures that trust modifications fit within a comprehensive plan, reducing the risk of unintended gaps and improving confidence that assets will be distributed according to the settlor’s wishes and legal requirements.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to understand the trust, the parties involved, and the goals for modification. We gather documents, evaluate possible remedies, and recommend either informal resolution, negotiated settlement, or a court petition when warranted. If court action is necessary, we prepare a petition, serve notice, coordinate responses from interested parties, and pursue settlement or a hearing. Along the way, we advise about retitling assets and amending related estate documents to ensure the modification achieves its intended result and reduces future disputes.
The first step involves reviewing the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents, and asset records to determine available options. We assess whether the trust allows amendments, whether beneficiaries agree, or whether factual evidence supports a judicial modification. This stage includes identifying interested parties, potential conflicts, and the documents that will support the petition. A thorough early review clarifies the likely path forward and estimates timeframes and costs based on the complexity of the issues and the level of agreement among parties.
Collecting evidence such as trust drafts, correspondence, asset records, and witness statements is essential to support a petition or an amendment. Documentation that demonstrates the settlor’s intent, past transactions, or errors in drafting strengthens the legal position. Properly organized exhibits and witness declarations make it easier to present the case to other parties or the court, and reduce delays caused by missing information. Early organization also facilitates settlement discussions and helps identify which issues are truly disputed.
We advise clients about alternatives such as beneficiary agreements, trustee-led amendments, or mediation to resolve disputes without a court petition. Exploring these options can save time and expense and preserve family harmony while still accomplishing needed changes. When such alternatives are viable, we provide templates and guidance to document agreements properly and ensure that any amendments conform with state law. If alternatives fail, the documentation and communications gathered during this phase will strengthen the subsequent court petition.
If filing is appropriate, we prepare and file the petition with the appropriate court, following local rules for pleadings and service. Proper notice must be given to trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested persons so they have an opportunity to respond. We handle the logistics of filing, serve documents according to statutory requirements, and follow up on any responses or objections. This step sets the formal timeline for response and any hearing dates, and it ensures the court has a full record to consider the requested modification.
After filing, interested parties may object or file responses that contest the requested modification. We evaluate objections, prepare replies, and engage in settlement negotiations to narrow the contested issues. Mediation or facilitated discussions often resolve matters without a contested hearing. When settlement is not possible, we prepare legal arguments and evidentiary support to address objections at hearing, focusing on demonstrating why the modification aligns with legal standards and the settlor’s intent while safeguarding beneficiaries’ rights.
When disputes persist, we prepare declarations, exhibits, and legal briefs to present at hearing. Courts sometimes issue interim orders for asset preservation or administration while the petition is pending. We request appropriate interim relief when needed and make sure trustees have guidance on managing trust affairs under court supervision. Solid preparation at this stage informs the court, addresses evidentiary issues, and maximizes the chance of a favorable, clear, and enforceable ruling that resolves the contested matters.
Once the court rules or the parties reach a settlement, we assist with drafting and recording any required court orders, amended trust documents, and related documents to implement the change. This may include preparing certifications of trust for banks, retitling assets, updating beneficiary designations, and revising powers of attorney or healthcare directives as appropriate. Proper documentation ensures third parties recognize trustee authority and that the trust administration proceeds smoothly in harmony with the court’s decision or the parties’ agreement.
After a court order or agreement is finalized, it is often necessary to retitle assets, record deeds, or provide certifications to financial institutions so the trust can be administered as intended. We prepare and coordinate the required paperwork and communications with banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators to reflect the new trust structure. Prompt and accurate implementation avoids administrative obstacles and ensures trustees have the authority needed to manage, invest, and distribute trust assets according to the updated plan.
A comprehensive resolution includes updating ancillary documents so the entire estate plan remains consistent. We advise on amendments to pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and beneficiary designations to reflect the modification and prevent gaps that could defeat the intended outcome. Coordinating these updates reduces the chance that assets will unintentionally pass outside the trust and ensures continuity of the settlor’s broader estate planning goals and instructions for decision-making in situations of incapacity.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing requesting changes to a trust when informal amendments are not available or when the parties cannot agree. You might need a petition when the trust contains ambiguous language, when a drafting mistake undermines the settlor’s apparent intent, or when changed circumstances make existing provisions impractical. Courts consider the settlor’s probable intent, the rights of beneficiaries, and equitable principles when deciding whether to grant a modification, and the process can provide a definitive, enforceable outcome that guides trustees and protects beneficiaries. Before filing, consider whether the trust’s amendment provisions or beneficiary agreements could achieve the desired change more quickly and privately. If a petition is necessary, careful fact gathering and clear presentation of the settlor’s intent and the grounds for modification are critical. The petition should include supporting documents, witness declarations, and a well-reasoned explanation of why the court action serves the trust’s underlying purpose and benefits the parties involved.
Deciding between an informal amendment and a court petition depends on the trust language, the parties’ willingness to agree, and the nature of the issue. If the trust expressly permits amendments and the settlor is able and willing to sign a valid amendment, that route is often faster and less costly. When beneficiaries and trustees can reach a written agreement that is properly documented and legally enforceable, it can accomplish needed changes while preserving privacy and relationships. A court petition becomes appropriate when parties cannot agree, when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and no amendment power exists, or when legal issues such as mistake or ambiguity require judicial clarification. Evaluate the risks and benefits of each path in light of potential costs, likely outcomes, and the need for finality to protect trustee actions and beneficiary interests.
In California, parties who typically have standing to file a petition include trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes successor trustees or other interested persons who have a direct interest in the trust’s administration. When the settlor is alive but incapacitated, a guardian or conservator with appropriate authority may seek relief related to trust administration. The exact rules about who may file depend on the relief sought and the terms of the trust, so identifying interested parties early is an important part of case planning. Determining proper parties is also essential for service and notice requirements, as all interested persons must be notified of the petition and given an opportunity to respond. Ensuring that all relevant parties are included prevents procedural defects and supports a final, enforceable resolution that addresses everyone’s rights under the trust.
Evidence to support a reformation or modification petition may include the original trust document and any draft versions, correspondence or contemporaneous notes showing the settlor’s intent, witness declarations from persons present when the trust was created, and financial records related to asset transfers. Documentary evidence that demonstrates what the settlor intended and why the trust as written fails to accomplish that intent is often persuasive. In cases of mistake, proof of the error and the intended provision is necessary. Additional evidence might include certifications of trust, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, or other exhibits that clarify asset ownership and demonstrate why judicial action is needed to protect beneficiaries and ensure proper administration. Well-organized, credible evidence is crucial for persuading the court to grant the requested relief.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, the court’s schedule, and whether the case settles. Simple matters with cooperative parties may be resolved in a matter of weeks or a few months, but contested petitions that require hearings and substantial evidence can take many months or longer. Local court calendars and mandatory waiting periods for notice and response also influence the schedule. Engaging in early settlement discussions or mediation can shorten the process, while heavily contested matters will naturally take more time to resolve. Preparing thorough pleadings and gathering evidence early helps avoid delays, and the firm will advise you on realistic timelines based on the local court and the specifics of your case.
Whether a modification affects tax liability depends on the nature of the change and the type of trust. Some modifications can have tax consequences, particularly if they alter beneficial interests, change grantor trust status, or affect estate or gift tax considerations. It is important to evaluate proposed changes in light of federal and state tax rules and to consider coordinating with a tax professional when significant assets or complex tax issues are involved. When modifications are planned, we review potential tax implications and recommend approaches that minimize adverse consequences where possible. This may include structuring changes to preserve favorable tax treatment, advising on retitling strategies, or coordinating with accountants and tax advisors to ensure the overall estate plan remains tax efficient and aligned with the settlor’s financial goals.
Trustee removal or replacement can sometimes be accomplished through trust provisions, agreement among beneficiaries, or, when necessary, by petitioning the court. Grounds for removal include incapacity, conflicts of interest, breach of fiduciary duty, or inability to administer trust assets effectively. A petition to remove a trustee typically requires showing that removal is in the best interests of the beneficiaries and that the trustee’s continued service would be detrimental to proper administration. If removal is warranted, the court can appoint a successor trustee or approve a named successor. When seeking removal, it is important to document the reasons thoroughly and to propose a reasonable replacement plan to ensure continuity of trust administration and minimize disruption to beneficiaries and trust management.
A Heggstad petition is used to have the court declare that certain assets are part of a trust even though title was never formally transferred into the trust’s name. This often occurs when the settlor intended assets to be in the trust but failed to retitle them before death or incapacitation. The petition presents evidence of the settlor’s intent to include those assets and requests judicial recognition so they can be administered and distributed according to the trust terms. Heggstad petitions clarify ownership and prevent assets from passing through probate separately from trust assets, preserving the settlor’s overall plan. Preparing such a petition requires careful documentation of intent and ownership history and may involve coordinating with financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties to ensure those assets are properly recognized as trust property.
Disputes among beneficiaries are often resolved through negotiation, mediation, or court intervention when necessary. Many families find that facilitated conversations or mediation help identify compromises that preserve relationships and avoid the cost and publicity of litigation. When parties cannot reach agreement, a court petition provides a formal venue to resolve contested issues and obtain a binding decision that clarifies rights and duties under the trust. The chosen approach depends on the nature of the disagreement, the willingness of parties to compromise, and the need for definitive legal clarity. Early engagement in settlement discussions and clear documentation of offers and concessions can limit disputed issues and result in outcomes that protect beneficiaries and facilitate effective trust administration.
After the court approves a trust modification, the next steps involve implementing the court’s order and updating relevant documents and titles. This may include preparing an amended trust or recording deeds to retitle real property, providing certifications of trust to financial institutions, and coordinating beneficiary designation updates where necessary. Proper implementation ensures that trustees can manage and distribute assets in accordance with the updated terms and that third parties recognize the authority granted by the order. We assist clients with the implementation process to ensure that all administrative steps are completed and documented. This includes communicating with banks, title companies, and other institutions, preparing the necessary paperwork, and advising on any follow-up matters such as tax reporting or additional amendments to related estate planning instruments to maintain overall consistency.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas