A Heggstad petition can be an important remedy when a decedent intended for assets to pass to a trust but failed to transfer title correctly. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Rubidoux and across Riverside County understand when a petition is appropriate, how the process works, and what outcomes to expect. A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize trust ownership of specific property as of the date of death, preventing probate or clearing title. This introduction explains the petition’s purpose and how it fits into a complete estate plan, including trusts and pour-over wills.
Many families discover after a trustmaker’s death that assets were not retitled into the trust, creating uncertainty and potential probate delays. A Heggstad petition provides a path to confirm that the decedent intended those assets to be part of the trust and to have them administered according to the trust terms. Our office provides clear counsel about documentation, timing, and the petitions typically required. This overview clarifies practical steps, common evidence used in filings, and how a careful approach can preserve privacy and streamline administration of the decedent’s estate in California.
Filing a Heggstad petition can protect a family’s intentions and avoid the time, expense, and publicity of full probate. When assets remain outside a trust due to oversight or timing, a successful petition recognizes the trust’s ownership and permits distribution under its terms. Benefits include avoiding supplemental probate administration for specific assets, clarifying title for property transactions, and reducing conflicts among beneficiaries. This remedy also helps trustees and heirs access bank accounts, real estate, or other assets more quickly, improving cash flow and allowing estate administration to proceed with less court supervision and fewer administration costs.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients throughout California, including Rubidoux residents, with trust administration and petition matters. Our attorneys focus on practical, client-centered solutions to resolve titling gaps and facilitate efficient transfers to trusts. We review estate planning documents, gather evidence of intent, prepare pleadings, and represent clients in hearings when necessary. Clients rely on our careful preparation and clear communication to reduce uncertainty during a difficult time. We strive to protect privacy and expedite outcomes that honor a decedent’s estate plan and reduce administrative burdens on family members.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that certain assets should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and actions before death. The petition typically includes document evidence such as a trust instrument, bank records, deeds, beneficiary designations, and correspondence indicating intent. The court evaluates whether the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and if the trustee should control the asset after death. Understanding the types of evidence commonly used and the procedural steps is essential to evaluating whether a petition is the right remedy for your situation.
Timing and proper documentation are important when pursuing a Heggstad petition. The filing party must provide sufficient facts to show intent, often supported by witness declarations or contemporaneous records. Not all assets require the same approach; real property, bank accounts, and securities each present unique title issues. Additionally, when multiple heirs or potential claimants exist, notice procedures and potential objections must be managed. A thoughtful approach minimizes disputes, protects trustee authority, and helps ensure assets are administered according to the decedent’s plan without unnecessary delay or expense.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing under California law asking the court to recognize that specific property belonged in a decedent’s trust despite not being formally re-titled before death. It is often used when a trustmaker clearly intended assets to fund a trust but administrative oversights left them in the decedent’s individual name. The petition asks the court to apply trust terms to those assets and to authorize the trustee to manage or distribute them. This remedy helps avoid separate probate proceedings for each asset and keeps administration aligned with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Successful Heggstad petitions usually rely on a combination of documentary evidence, witness testimony, and a clear demonstration of intent. Typical elements include a signed trust instrument, deeds or account statements showing intended transfers, correspondence about funding the trust, and affidavits from individuals familiar with the decedent’s plans. The process involves preparing detailed pleadings, serving interested parties, and responding to any objections. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property as of the date of death, permitting trustee administration under the trust’s terms.
This glossary defines common terms you may encounter during a Heggstad petition or trust administration. Understanding these terms can help you follow pleadings, court orders, and trustee actions. Definitions cover legal concepts such as trustee, settlor, probate, transfer on death accounts, deeds, and petitions to determine trust ownership. Familiarity with these phrases can assist in gathering documentation and communicating effectively with counsel and the court when seeking a ruling that aligns assets with a trust’s provisions.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a person places assets under the control of a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries. Trusts often contain instructions for management, distribution, and successor trustees. In estate planning, trusts are commonly used to avoid probate, provide privacy, and set conditions for distributions. When assets intended for a trust are not properly transferred, a Heggstad petition can help the court determine whether those assets should be treated as part of the trust as of the decedent’s death.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing in California requesting that specific property be recognized as trust property even though title was not formally transferred before death. The petition requires evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. It helps trustees obtain authority to manage or distribute assets under the trust without initiating separate probate proceedings for each item. The petition can cover a range of asset types, including real property and financial accounts, and often involves submitting trusts, deeds, account records, and witness statements.
Probate is the court-supervised process for validating a will, settling debts, and distributing assets when a decedent dies without a fully funded trust or clear beneficiary designations. Probate can be time-consuming and public, requiring court filings, hearings, and creditor notifications. A Heggstad petition can reduce the need for probate on specific assets by showing they were intended to be trust property, allowing those assets to be administered privately under trust terms rather than through the probate estate.
Trust funding is the process of transferring ownership of assets into a trust during the trustmaker’s life or by operation of law at death. Proper funding requires retitling accounts and property or naming the trust as a beneficiary. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to confirm that assets should be treated as part of the trust. Effective trust funding is a key step in ensuring the trust functions as intended and that assets pass according to the trust instrument without additional court administration.
When assets are not titled in a trust, several remedies may be available depending on circumstances: a Heggstad petition, probate administration, or alternate filings such as a petition for determination of trust property. Choosing the right path depends on factors like asset type, value, the presence of a will, and potential disputes among heirs. A Heggstad petition can be faster and less public than probate for covered assets, while probate may still be necessary for property truly outside the trust. Evaluating these options requires a careful review of documents and interested parties.
A limited filing such as a Heggstad petition may be appropriate when only a few assets were omitted from the trust and their values are modest relative to the entire estate. In such cases, pursuing a focused petition can resolve title or distribution issues without opening a full probate estate. The targeted approach often reduces court time, avoids broad creditor notice requirements, and limits exposure to contested proceedings. Identifying that limited scope and documenting intent can allow trustees to move forward with minimal administrative overhead and preserve estate resources for beneficiaries.
When there is clear documentary evidence—such as a trust instrument, related deeds, beneficiary designations, or written instructions—showing the decedent intended assets to fund the trust, a Heggstad petition can often resolve issues quickly. Strong contemporaneous records and witness statements reduce the likelihood of disputes and allow the court to focus narrowly on recognizing trust ownership. This usually results in faster relief than probate and helps trustees administer those assets according to the trust terms with greater certainty and less court supervision.
Comprehensive legal action may be needed when numerous assets were not transferred to a trust or when assets are complex, such as closely held business interests, retirement accounts, or property with title disputes. In those circumstances, a wider approach including probate administration, multiple petitions, or negotiated settlements may be required to address creditor claims, beneficiary issues, and tax considerations. A thorough plan helps coordinate filings, preserve asset value, and ensure lawful distribution across complex holdings, reducing the risk of unintended results during settlement.
If disagreements among heirs or potential creditor claims are likely, a broader legal strategy may be necessary to protect assets and resolve competing interests. Actions such as probate administration, declaratory relief, or negotiated resolutions can provide comprehensive protection while ensuring legal notice requirements are met. Managing disputes early and employing a thorough approach can prevent protracted litigation, safeguard estate assets, and produce clearer outcomes for beneficiaries, creditors, and trustees engaged in administering the estate in accordance with California law.
A comprehensive approach to resolving titling and administration issues provides greater certainty and often reduces long-term risk. By reviewing all assets, beneficiary designations, deeds, and account titles, the firm can identify gaps that might lead to future disputes or creditor problems. Comprehensive planning allows unified filings and coordinated responses to claims, which can protect estate value and ensure distributions reflect the decedent’s intentions. This method also supports clearer communication with heirs, trustees, and third parties, making administration more efficient overall.
Taking a broad view can reveal tax, creditor, or legal considerations that a narrowly focused petition might miss. Addressing these matters proactively can avoid unexpected liabilities or delays that reduce the estate’s value. Coordinated resolution also supports better recordkeeping and helps trustees fulfill fiduciary duties with confidence. When multiple assets and parties are involved, a comprehensive strategy can streamline the process, lessen conflict, and produce more durable outcomes for beneficiaries while aligning administration steps with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
A comprehensive review and coordinated filings reduce the odds of later disputes by addressing title gaps, clarifying beneficiary intent, and ensuring required notices are provided. By identifying potential conflicts early and consolidating remedies, trustees can obtain court directions that minimize ambiguity. This clarity protects fiduciaries and beneficiaries, helps maintain family relationships, and avoids subsequent litigation that would consume estate assets. A broad approach provides peace of mind that the administration follows a clear, defensible path consistent with the decedent’s plan.
Though broader legal work may involve more initial effort, it can be more cost-effective overall by preventing overlapping proceedings, repeated filings, and contested litigation. Resolving multiple title issues together conserves estate resources and shortens administration timelines. The result is streamlined distributions and fewer interruptions for trustees and beneficiaries. Prioritizing a complete solution minimizes the administrative burden on family members and helps preserve more of the estate for intended recipients rather than spending funds on prolonged court involvement.
Collecting trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence showing intent to fund a trust is essential before filing a Heggstad petition. Early gathering of records saves time and can strengthen the petition by showing a consistent pattern of intent. Witness statements from individuals who knew the decedent’s plans can support the petition. Preparing a complete evidentiary package reduces the likelihood of delays or objections and helps the court reach a decision that aligns assets with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
A thorough review of all estate planning documents, account titles, deeds, and beneficiary designations can identify multiple items that need attention. Consolidating fixes—such as updating titles or filing coordinated petitions—often saves time and money. A comprehensive review ensures trustees have the authority they need and minimizes the chance that additional assets will surface later, creating further administrative work. This foresight helps preserve estate value and supports a smoother administration that reflects the decedent’s overarching plan.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a trustmaker clearly intended assets to be part of a trust but those assets remain titled in the decedent’s individual name. This often occurs with real property, bank accounts, or vehicles overlooked during trust funding. The petition can confirm trust ownership, enabling trustees to manage or distribute assets without separate probate. Families facing urgent access needs for funds, or those who wish to protect privacy and reduce court involvement, may find a petition offers a practical path to align asset ownership with the trustmaker’s written plan.
Also consider this service when closing estate matters quickly is important due to cash needs, tax timelines, or ongoing business operations. A Heggstad petition can shorten delays in obtaining clear title or access to accounts, allowing trustees to meet obligations and beneficiaries to receive distributions. If estate documents show consistent intent and potential claimants are limited, a petition may be the most efficient remedy. Each case differs, and a careful review of documentation and interested parties helps determine whether filing will achieve the desired outcome.
Typical circumstances include a trustmaker’s assets not being retitled before death, real property left in the decedent’s name, recently created trusts without completed transfers, or accounts with mismatched beneficiary designations. Family members may also encounter title issues when trusts are amended or when assets were purchased with trust funds but not recorded properly. Each of these situations can be resolved through a petition that presents evidence of intent and requests court recognition that the assets belong to the trust as of the date of death.
It is common to find deeds to real property still in the decedent’s individual name at the time of death. A Heggstad petition can request the court to confirm that the property was intended to be held by the trust, providing authority to the trustee to manage or sell the property under the trust terms. Resolving title through a petition helps complete the trust administration without separate probate for that parcel, simplifying transfers and avoiding further complications in distributing the estate’s real property assets.
Sometimes bank or investment accounts remain in the decedent’s name instead of being retitled to the trust. A Heggstad petition can provide the court declaration needed to allow trustees to access funds for estate expenses and distributions. Clear records showing contributions, statements, or instructions indicating the account was intended to be part of the trust will strengthen the petition. Early resolution of account ownership helps trustees pay bills, taxes, and other obligations while moving forward with administration according to the trust instrument.
When trusts are newly created or amended, administrative steps to transfer assets may lag, leaving gaps at the time of death. Drafting oversights or last-minute changes may mean documents reflect intent but titles were not updated. In these situations, a Heggstad petition can bridge the procedural gap by presenting the trust documents and corroborating evidence to the court. Addressing these oversights promptly can reduce confusion, avoid probate where possible, and allow distributions to proceed per the trustmaker’s most recent directions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Rubidoux and throughout Riverside County with focused representation on trust administration and Heggstad petitions. We assist trustees, successors, and family members in gathering records, drafting petitions, and navigating court procedures. Our goal is to provide practical solutions that confirm trust ownership and enable timely administration. Clients receive clear communication about required steps, anticipated timelines, and the documentation needed to support a petition and restore title to trust-held assets when appropriate.
Selecting counsel for a Heggstad petition means choosing a team that understands California’s probate and trust administration framework and the types of evidence courts find persuasive. We focus on producing thorough filings, documenting intent, and managing communications with interested parties to reduce contention. Our attorneys work to secure timely solutions that respect the decedent’s planning choices and minimize public court involvement. We also advise trustees on governance responsibilities to ensure distributions and asset management follow the trust terms.
Clients benefit from our attention to detail in preparing petitions, gathering all relevant records, and explaining procedural options clearly. We coordinate with trustees, beneficiaries, financial institutions, and title companies as needed to resolve ownership issues. When disputes arise, we represent clients in hearings and seek practical resolutions that protect estate value and beneficiary interests. Our objective approach aims to streamline administration, reduce expense, and produce outcomes that reflect the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
We also assist with preventative planning to reduce the likelihood of future Heggstad petitions by recommending routine reviews of titles and beneficiary designations. Our guidance helps clients implement straightforward steps that preserve the intended function of trusts, such as updating deeds and account registrations. When oversight has already occurred, we promptly evaluate the most appropriate filings to achieve title clarity and minimize disruption, offering steady support through each stage of administration and court procedures.
Our process begins with a careful intake to understand the decedent’s estate plan, identify assets not titled to the trust, and assemble supporting documentation. We then evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or if alternate filings are necessary. If proceeding, we draft pleadings, prepare declarations, and coordinate notice to interested parties. We aim to resolve matters through clear presentation and, when possible, negotiated solutions before hearing. If a hearing is required, we represent clients in court to seek recognition of trust ownership and authority for trustee actions.
The first step involves a detailed review of estate planning documents and asset records to identify which items require a petition. We collect deeds, account statements, trust instruments, and any written communications that show the trustmaker’s intent. This stage often includes interviews with family members or financial institutions to locate all relevant materials. A thorough evidence collection process forms the foundation of a convincing petition and helps clarify whether the Heggstad petition is the most efficient route to resolve ownership issues.
We perform a comprehensive inventory of estate assets and review trust and will documents to determine gaps in funding. This includes confirming account titles, deed records, and beneficiary designations. Identifying every potentially affected asset early allows us to craft a petition that addresses the full scope of the problem and reduces the need for multiple filings. A careful inventory supports a cohesive approach and ensures that trustees have the authority needed to manage estate obligations promptly.
Gathering witness declarations, correspondence, and financial records is critical to show the decedent’s intent to place assets in the trust. We prepare declarations from individuals with direct knowledge and collect documentary evidence such as bank statements, purchase records, and emails. Presenting a well-documented record strengthens the petition and reduces the potential for objections. This evidence stage is designed to create a clear narrative for the court that justifies recognizing trust ownership as of the decedent’s date of death.
After assembling evidence, we prepare the formal petition and required supporting documents for filing with the probate court. This includes drafting detailed pleadings explaining why the assets should be treated as trust property and identifying interested parties who must receive notice. Proper service is essential to provide all potential claimants with an opportunity to object. We handle all procedural requirements to ensure the filing is complete, minimizing the chance of procedural delays and keeping the matter moving efficiently through the court system.
We draft the petition, declarations, and exhibits that lay out the factual and legal basis for recognizing assets as trust property. Exhibits typically include the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and declarations from witnesses. Clear, organized pleadings help the court evaluate the evidence and expedite decision-making. Attention to detail at this stage helps avoid unnecessary continuances and ensures judges have the information needed to rule on the petition effectively.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, creditors, and other interested parties is a procedural necessity and helps prevent future challenges. We manage service and monitor responses, addressing any objections with factual rebuttals, negotiated resolutions, or court briefing as appropriate. Where objections arise, we seek practical outcomes that protect the estate while honoring the trustmaker’s documented intentions. Handling notice and objections professionally reduces the likelihood of protracted litigation and aids in achieving a timely court resolution.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence to the judge and respond to any objections raised by interested parties. The goal is to obtain a court order declaring that specified assets were trust property as of the decedent’s death, enabling the trustee to administer them under the trust. Following a favorable ruling, we assist in implementing the order, transferring title when necessary, and advising trustees on next steps to complete estate administration in accordance with the court’s directions.
At the hearing, we present documentary evidence and witness declarations showing the decedent’s intent and the connection between the asset and the trust. Clear oral argument and well-organized exhibits help the court make factual findings required for a ruling. Our courtroom preparation focuses on clarifying any disputed points, addressing procedural issues, and emphasizing the consistent record of intent gathered during the evidence phase. Effective presentation increases the likelihood the court will recognize the asset as trust property.
Once the court issues an order recognizing assets as part of the trust, we assist trustees in implementing the order, which may include recording an amended deed, updating account registrations, or presenting the order to financial institutions. We guide trustees on complying with court directives and help complete administrative tasks required to transfer or distribute assets. This assistance ensures the court’s decision translates into practical results for beneficiaries and reduces the risk of follow-up disputes or procedural missteps.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing asking the court to recognize that specific assets were intended to be held in a decedent’s trust despite not being formally retitled before death. The petition presents evidence such as the trust document, deeds, account records, and witness declarations to show the trustmaker’s intent. When successful, the petition allows the trustee to manage and distribute those assets under the trust terms, often avoiding separate probate for the identified property and preserving privacy and efficiency in handling estate matters. This remedy can help families by reducing delays in accessing funds needed for estate administration and by clarifying title for real property or accounts. It is particularly useful when oversight or timing issues left assets outside the trust. Each case depends on the available evidence and the number of interested parties; a careful review helps determine whether a petition will likely achieve a timely and cost-effective result for the family.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on factors such as the complexity of the assets, the thoroughness of the evidence, and whether objections arise from interested parties. In many uncontested cases, a petition can move through filing, notice, and hearing within a few months, while contested matters may take longer depending on court schedules and the need for additional discovery or briefing. Local court caseloads in Riverside County can also affect processing times, so early preparation helps avoid delays. Efficient handling depends on assembling complete documentation and ensuring proper service to all interested parties. Promptly addressing any objections or procedural issues and coordinating with financial institutions and title companies to implement court orders after a ruling can shorten the overall timeline. Regular communication with counsel and a clear strategic plan help clients anticipate and manage scheduling expectations throughout the process.
Courts look for a consistent record demonstrating the decedent’s intent to place specific assets in the trust. Persuasive evidence often includes a signed trust document showing the asset was meant to be included, deeds or account statements reflecting transfers or contributions, written instructions or correspondence, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intentions. Contemporaneous records tying asset acquisition or control to the trust are particularly helpful in establishing that the asset should be treated as trust property. The quality and coherence of the evidence matter more than sheer volume. A well-organized petition that ties each piece of evidence to a clear narrative of intent usually carries greater weight. Demonstrating consistent intent across multiple documents and providing credible witness statements helps the court make factual findings necessary to recognize trust ownership as of the date of death.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific assets it covers by asking the court to treat those assets as trust property. It does not, however, automatically prevent probate for assets that are truly outside the trust or where evidence of intent is lacking. If most of an estate’s assets were properly funded into the trust, a petition can resolve remaining gaps and reduce the scope of any probate administration. In contrast, where substantial assets are outside the trust or creditor concerns exist, probate may still be necessary for those portions of the estate. Determining whether a petition will avoid probate for all assets requires a case-by-case analysis of titles, beneficiary designations, and estate documentation. A careful review helps identify which assets can be covered by a petition and which will require alternative measures. Combining petitions with other filings may achieve the most efficient administration while protecting the estate and beneficiaries.
California probate rules require providing notice to interested parties when a Heggstad petition is filed. Interested parties typically include heirs, beneficiaries, trustees, executors, and potential creditors whose rights could be affected. Proper service ensures that all parties have an opportunity to review the petition and object if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property. Complying with notice rules helps prevent later challenges and supports a smoother court process. Careful identification and timely service minimize procedural problems and reduce the likelihood of contested hearings. If any parties cannot be located, publishing notice or seeking alternate methods may be required under local court rules. We assist clients in identifying the proper recipients of notice and managing the service process to meet statutory requirements and protect the integrity of the petition.
Common objections to Heggstad petitions include disputes over the decedent’s intent, competing claims by heirs, or challenges to the authenticity of documents. Parties may also raise questions about creditor rights or whether the asset was actually part of another estate instrument. Addressing these objections often involves presenting stronger documentary proof, obtaining declarations from witnesses, or negotiating a resolution among parties. When appropriate, the court may require additional evidence or hold a contested hearing to resolve disputed facts. Preparing to handle objections includes anticipating likely challenges and gathering corroborating evidence in advance. Clear communication with interested parties and, when possible, exploring settlements can reduce the need for lengthy litigation. When disputes persist, competent representation in court ensures that factual records are presented effectively so the judge can reach a well-supported decision on trust ownership.
Unlike probate administration, which is generally a public court process, a successful Heggstad petition can allow assets to be confirmed as trust property with limited public disclosure beyond the petition and court order. While the filing itself becomes part of court records, resolving specific title issues through a petition may avoid opening a broader probate case that would require ongoing public filings and greater publicity. This can help maintain privacy for the decedent’s estate and beneficiaries whenever possible. That said, certain documents and the court’s order may still be accessible through public records. Parties seeking confidentiality should discuss strategies for limiting unnecessary disclosure and exploring alternative procedures where appropriate. Proper planning and careful presentation of limited filings can often achieve needed results while preserving as much privacy as the process allows.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include full probate administration, small estate procedures where applicable, or administrative actions with financial institutions and title companies to correct ownership without court intervention. In some instances, affidavits, beneficiary transfer documents, or negotiated transfers may resolve minor issues. However, when formal recognition from a court is needed to establish trust ownership or when institutions require judicial clearance, a Heggstad petition may be the most practical solution to ensure clear authority for trustees. Evaluating alternatives depends on the value and type of assets, the number of interested parties, and institutional requirements. A careful assessment of these factors helps determine whether a petition is necessary or if other less formal methods can achieve the same result. When uncertainty exists, legal guidance ensures the chosen path minimizes risk and aligns with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Cost for filing a Heggstad petition depends on the complexity of the case, the number of assets involved, and whether objections require additional court proceedings. Simple, uncontested petitions with clear documentation may involve modest filing fees and limited attorney time, while contested matters requiring hearings, discovery, or litigation will increase costs. Local court filing fees and potential costs for title work or expert reports may also apply. An early assessment provides a clearer estimate tailored to the estate’s specific circumstances. We provide transparent fee discussions and help clients understand likely expenses for preparing the petition, serving interested parties, and representing matters at hearing if needed. Where possible, we recommend cost-effective steps, such as negotiating resolutions and consolidating related actions, to reduce overall expense while still achieving secure outcomes for trustees and beneficiaries.
Preventing the need for a Heggstad petition starts with routine estate maintenance: regularly review trust documents, retitle real property and accounts into the trust, and update beneficiary designations when circumstances change. Recording deeds, changing account registrations, and confirming that retirement accounts have proper beneficiary designations are practical steps that reduce the risk of assets remaining outside the trust. Periodic checkups with legal counsel and financial institutions help catch oversights before they create administration problems after death. Communicating plans with trustees and family members and keeping clear records of transfers and intentions also reduces uncertainty. When changes are made to a trust, follow through on funding steps promptly so documentation matches intent. These proactive measures preserve the privacy and efficiency benefits of trusts and minimize the need for court petitions to correct titling errors.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas