A trust modification petition allows a settlor, trustee, or beneficiary to request changes to an existing trust order through the probate court when circumstances or intentions have shifted since the trust was created. In Rubidoux and throughout Riverside County, these petitions are commonly pursued when family circumstances change, when assets need to be reallocated, or when language in the trust is ambiguous and creates disputes. This page describes when a trust modification petition may be appropriate, the types of relief courts can grant, and how local procedures in Riverside County can affect timing and required documentation for filing a petition.
Trust modification petitions are distinct from creating new estate plans; they ask the court to alter an existing trust document to reflect changed circumstances, remove or replace trustees, fix drafting errors, or address matters that the trust did not anticipate. Parties considering a petition should assess whether a non-judicial approach could succeed first, such as agreement among eligible parties or using amendment provisions in the trust. When agreement is not possible or when court approval is required to ensure enforceability, a petition provides a formal pathway for resolving disputes and obtaining binding orders from the court.
Filing a trust modification petition can protect the interests of beneficiaries and trustees by obtaining clear judicial guidance on how a trust should operate under new facts. Court-approved modifications reduce uncertainty and lower the chance of future litigation by producing an enforceable order that clarifies intent and administration. In matters involving significant assets, family changes, or competing claims, a modification petition helps secure a lasting resolution. For individuals in Rubidoux, formal court action can also provide administrative tools to address trustee removal, correction of drafting mistakes, or modifications required by changed tax or family circumstances.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters for clients across California, including Riverside County and Rubidoux. The firm offers personalized attention to each client, combining practical knowledge of state and local procedures with a problem-solving approach to minimize delays and unnecessary expense. Our team works with clients to gather documentation, communicate with other parties, and present clear petitions and declarations to the court. The goal in every matter is to protect client interests while pursuing efficient and durable solutions for trust modifications and related estate planning issues.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to change terms or correct problems in an existing trust. Common grounds for a petition include rectifying mistakes in drafting, addressing ambiguous provisions that cause disputes, adapting the trust to changed family or financial circumstances, or removing and replacing trustees who cannot or should not continue to serve. The court evaluates evidence, considers the interests of beneficiaries, and determines whether the requested relief aligns with the settlor’s intent and legal standards. Outcomes may include modification, reformation, clarification, or other orders tailored to the specific case.
Not every problem with a trust requires a court petition. Many trusts include amendment procedures or allow trustees and beneficiaries to reach agreements that change administration without litigation. However, when parties disagree or when changes could affect third parties, a petition can provide the certainty of judicial oversight. Filing requires clear documentation of the trust, a statement of the requested modifications, and supporting evidence such as communications, accountings, or factual declarations explaining why court action is necessary to carry out the settlor’s intent or to protect trust assets and beneficiary interests.
A trust modification petition is a formal request submitted to the probate or superior court asking for alteration or clarification of a trust instrument. Petitioners must explain the legal and factual basis for the requested changes and attach the relevant trust documents and supporting declarations. The court may schedule hearings, allow interested parties to respond, and examine evidence to determine whether the modification should be granted. Orders can address changes to distribution terms, trustee powers, correction of errors, or other administrative matters necessary to give effect to the settlor’s likely intent.
Successful petitions present clear documentary evidence, a concise legal argument, and a factual record demonstrating why modification is appropriate. Common elements include a copy of the trust, declarations from interested parties, accountings or asset lists, notices to beneficiaries and potential heirs, and any proposed amended trust language. Local court rules in Riverside County may also require filing specific forms, paying fees, and following particular service procedures. The process typically involves pre-filing communication, filing the petition, serving interested parties, responding to objections, and attending any required hearings.
This glossary summarizes terms commonly used in trust modification matters so clients can follow the process with confidence. Understanding phrases such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, and probate court will help you evaluate your options. Many matters turn on the distinction between administrative actions that can be handled outside court and substantive changes that require judicial approval. Knowing these terms aids in clear communication with counsel, swift preparation of documents, and realistic expectations for timing and likely outcomes in Rubidoux and Riverside County proceedings.
A settlor is the person who created and funded the trust and who established its terms and purposes. The settlor’s intent, as evidenced by the trust instrument and related documents, is central to determining whether a trust should be modified or reformed. Courts give significant weight to the settlor’s probable intent when reviewing petitions, taking into account the trust language, surrounding circumstances, and any admissible extrinsic evidence. If the settlor is alive, the settlor’s wishes may directly guide modification; if the settlor is deceased, courts infer intent from the trust and relevant documentation.
Reformation refers to a court order that corrects a mistake or ambiguity in the trust document so that it reflects the settlor’s actual intent. Petitioners seeking reformation present evidence showing that the trust language does not match the intended terms due to a drafting error, omission, or misunderstanding. Reformation typically requires convincing proof such as contemporaneous drafts, correspondence, or testimony indicating the intended provisions. When successful, the court issues an order aligning the trust instrument with the decedent’s or settlor’s true intent while preserving the document’s legal effect.
Trustee removal or replacement involves asking the court to remove a trustee who is unable or unfit to serve, or to appoint a successor trustee to carry out trust administration. Grounds for removal can include failure to perform duties, conflict of interest, incapacity, breach of fiduciary duty, or persistent mismanagement. Petitioners must provide evidence supporting removal and propose a suitable successor or ask the court to appoint one. The court balances fairness to beneficiaries with the need for competent administration when deciding whether removal and replacement are appropriate.
Modification for changed circumstances occurs when a court alters a trust to address events unforeseen by the settlor, such as marital changes, significant changes in assets, or tax law shifts. Petitioners must show that circumstances have changed materially and that modification better aligns the trust with the settlor’s probable intent or prevents impractical or wasteful administration. Courts may permit limited modifications that preserve the trust’s overall purpose while adapting its terms to present realities, always striving to respect the original objectives of the settlor.
When a problem arises with a trust, parties should consider whether an out-of-court solution is feasible before filing a petition. Non-judicial options include negotiating amendments among beneficiaries and trustees, using internal amendment clauses, or pursuing mediation to resolve disputes. These approaches can save time and reduce cost, but they require cooperation among interested parties. When agreement cannot be reached, or when binding court approval is necessary to protect third parties or provide finality, a trust modification petition becomes the appropriate course to obtain enforceable resolution through judicial oversight.
If the issue is a minor typographical error, a simple administrative oversight, or a clarification that all interested parties accept, those matters can often be resolved without court involvement. For example, correcting an incorrect asset description or updating contact information in trust records may be handled through trustee action and written agreements among beneficiaries. Resolving these matters informally avoids court fees and hearings, but written documentation documenting the agreement and proper updating of trust records is essential to reduce the risk of future challenges or confusion.
When all affected parties agree to proposed modifications, they can often implement changes through mutual consent or by executing a valid amendment consistent with the trust’s amendment procedures. This requires clear written consent and proper execution to ensure enforceability. In situations where beneficiaries are fully informed and approve a change that does not harm others’ rights, mutual agreement can be an effective and efficient path. Nevertheless, having formal documentation and legal review helps prevent future disputes and preserves the integrity of the trust administration process.
Court petitions are often necessary when beneficiaries and trustees disagree about the meaning of trust provisions, distribution decisions, or trustee conduct. When disputes escalate or when some parties refuse to cooperate, filing a petition allows the court to review evidence and issue binding decisions. Judicial involvement is also important when contested matters include complex factual records, allegations of misconduct, or disputes involving multiple jurisdictions. A petition provides procedural protections, formal discovery if needed, and a definitive ruling that reduces the likelihood of ongoing conflict.
Some trust modifications implicate complicated legal or tax considerations that require court approval to avoid unintended consequences. For instance, changes affecting distribution timing, charitable interests, or spendthrift provisions may have tax implications or affect creditor rights. In such situations, a court-reviewed petition ensures adjustments are made in a legally sound manner that protects beneficiary interests and aligns with state law. Judicial orders also provide certainty that third parties, such as financial institutions and title companies, will recognize the changes.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification combines careful factual preparation with clear legal argumentation and effective communication with all interested parties. This reduces the risk of surprise objections, preserves credibility with the court, and increases the chance of obtaining an order that resolves disputes conclusively. Detailed preparation includes compiling asset inventories, beneficiary notices, declarations explaining the purpose for modification, and any supporting documentary evidence that demonstrates the need for court action and how the proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s overall purpose.
Beyond achieving the requested modification, a comprehensive strategy can expedite administration and reduce future conflicts by addressing related issues proactively. For example, resolving trustee appointment, clarifying distribution standards, and correcting drafting ambiguities in the same proceeding can prevent multiplicity of actions. Court orders resulting from thorough petitions are more likely to be respected by financial institutions and successor trustees, which helps ensure a smoother transition in trust administration and protects the long-term interests of beneficiaries and the trust estate.
When the court issues an order approving a modification, that ruling carries the force of law and reduces the likelihood of repeated disputes. Judicial approval creates a definitive record that can be relied upon by banks, brokers, and title companies, making it easier to effect asset transfers and trust administration changes. Finality is particularly important for matters involving significant assets, contested distributions, or successor trustee appointments because it provides the stability needed for trustees and beneficiaries to move forward with confidence in the trust’s administration.
A court-supervised modification helps ensure that changes protect all beneficiaries’ interests and hold trustees accountable to their fiduciary duties. By placing issues before the court, the process creates transparency, requires notice and an opportunity to object, and subjects the trustee’s actions to judicial review. This oversight benefits beneficiaries by safeguarding fair treatment and can protect trustees by confirming lawful authority before they undertake significant distributions or administrative actions, thereby reducing personal liability and disputes down the road.
Start by collecting the original trust instrument, any amendments or restatements, related wills such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and certification of trust documents. Include bank statements, deeds, retirement plan trust documents, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. Having a complete record helps frame your petition, supports claims about mistakes or changed circumstances, and makes it easier to propose precise modifications. Complete documentation also expedites the court’s review and reduces the chance of objections based on missing information.
When seeking judicial modification, prepare a clear redline or proposed revised language to show exactly what relief is requested. Support your petition with declarations explaining factual circumstances, copies of relevant correspondence, and any contemporaneous documents evidencing the settlor’s intent. A focused petition that explains why the change is necessary and how it preserves the trust’s overall purpose helps the court make an informed decision. Clear presentation reduces the need for multiple hearings and promotes efficient resolution for all parties.
You may need a trust modification petition when the original trust no longer accomplishes the settlor’s objectives because of life events like divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or significant changes in asset composition. Other reasons include correcting drafting errors that produce unintended results, addressing beneficiary incapacity or guardianship concerns, or resolving conflicts between beneficiaries and trustees. Petitioning the court brings legal authority to resolve these issues and can protect beneficiaries by creating enforceable directions for administration and distributions.
In addition to correcting or adapting trust language, petitions may be necessary to remove or replace trustees who are unwilling or unable to serve, to clarify trustee powers, or to seek instructions from the court on difficult administrative questions. When financial institutions require a court order before transferring assets or recognizing changes, a petition secures the documentation banks and brokers need. For residents of Rubidoux and nearby areas, working with counsel familiar with local court procedures can streamline the filing process and improve the chances of a timely resolution.
Common triggers for petitions include ambiguous trust provisions that lead to disputes, discovered drafting errors that alter intended distributions, reallocation of assets after major financial changes, and disputes over trustee conduct. Other situations prompting petitions are when a beneficiary needs special arrangements due to incapacity or when a trust’s terms inadvertently hinder administration. Each case is fact-specific, and courts consider the trust’s language, relevant communications, and the interests of all affected parties when evaluating whether intervention is necessary.
Ambiguities or internal contradictions in trust provisions can create confusion over distribution rights, trustee responsibilities, or the timing of distributions. When parties cannot agree on how language should be interpreted, a court petition can resolve the ambiguity by construing the trust terms in light of the settlor’s probable intent and surrounding circumstances. This process often relies on extrinsic evidence and can prevent protracted disputes by providing an authoritative interpretation that trustees and financial institutions can follow.
Significant life events like divorce, remarriage, the birth of children, or the sale or acquisition of major assets may render trust provisions outdated or impractical. When the trust’s terms no longer align with current realities, a petition can ask the court to permit modifications that reallocate assets or alter trustee powers to better achieve the settlor’s goals. Courts generally aim to preserve the settlor’s original purpose while allowing reasonable adjustments to address new circumstances.
When a trustee becomes incapacitated, resigns, or engages in conduct that jeopardizes trust administration, interested parties may need the court to remove or replace that trustee. Petitioners should present evidence of the trustee’s inability or unsuitability to serve, including failure to account for assets, breaches of fiduciary duty, or refusal to cooperate with beneficiaries. The court will weigh the benefits of maintaining continuity against the need for competent administration and may appoint a successor trustee to protect beneficiary interests and trust assets.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Rubidoux residents and nearby Riverside County communities with trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We help clients evaluate whether a negotiated solution is feasible, prepare petitions and supporting documents, manage required notices, and represent clients in court when litigation is necessary. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical scheduling, and careful preparation so clients can make informed decisions about trust administration and resolve disputes as efficiently as possible while protecting long-term interests.
Retaining counsel familiar with trust law and local court procedures makes a significant difference in outcomes for trust modification matters. We focus on building a thorough factual record, preparing clear legal arguments, and keeping clients informed at every stage of the process. Our office handles all aspects of the petition, from initial document gathering to serving interested parties and attending hearings, helping to reduce administrative burdens on clients and to advance their objectives in a focused and professional manner.
We also emphasize practical solutions that aim to reduce conflict and cost when possible, exploring negotiation and mediation where appropriate to reach amicable resolutions. When court action is necessary, we prepare persuasive petitions supported by declarations and documentary evidence tailored to the issues in the case. The goal is to obtain a durable ruling that protects beneficiary interests, clarifies trustee authority, and facilitates proper trust administration going forward.
For clients in Rubidoux and Riverside County who require more than document preparation, we provide representation in hearings and assist with the post-order tasks that often follow a modification, such as coordinating with financial institutions, updating trust records, and advising successor trustees on duties and compliance. This continuity helps ensure that the court’s order is implemented smoothly and that trust administration proceeds in a way that honors the settlor’s intended goals.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to identify the trust documents, parties, and desired outcomes, followed by targeted fact-gathering and identification of potential non-judicial resolutions. If court action is needed, we draft a focused petition, prepare supporting declarations, and ensure proper service and notice to interested parties. We advise clients on probable timelines and costs, respond to oppositions, and present the case at hearings. After obtaining an order, we assist with implementing changes and communicating with banks, brokers, and other institutions to effectuate the court-approved modifications.
The first step in any matter is a careful review of the trust instrument, amendments, related wills, and all supporting records. We evaluate whether the requested modification can be accomplished by agreement or if a petition is necessary. This stage includes identifying interested parties, compiling asset inventories such as bank accounts, real property, retirement plan trusts, and life insurance arrangements, and assessing the best legal pathway to achieve the client’s objectives while preserving the settlor’s intended distribution plan.
Collecting all versions of the trust, amendments, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and certifications of trust is essential to establishing the baseline terms and clarifying the settlor’s intent. We also gather evidence such as correspondence, drafts, and financial statements that may support claims of error or changed circumstances. A complete record helps to frame the petition effectively and reduces delays caused by missing documents when filing in Riverside County courts.
Early identification of trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is necessary so that proper notice can be given and potential objections anticipated. We prepare and serve notices as required by California probate rules, attempt to confer where appropriate, and document communications to demonstrate that efforts were made to resolve issues outside of court. Proper notice procedures are critical to ensuring the court has jurisdiction to decide the petition and to minimize procedural objections later in the case.
Once the petition is drafted and supporting materials are assembled, we file with the appropriate probate division of the superior court, pay filing fees, and arrange for service of process on all interested parties. The court may set hearing dates, require additional disclosures, or ask for further evidence. We monitor deadlines, respond to requests from the court, and work to resolve procedural issues promptly to keep the matter moving toward resolution without unnecessary delays.
Petitions that present concise proposed language for the modification and explain the desired form of the court’s order help judges understand and rule efficiently. We prepare proposed orders and redlined versions of the trust when appropriate, so the court can see exactly what changes are requested. Clear proposals reduce the need for repeated revisions and help interested parties evaluate the impact of the requested relief, often facilitating settlement or narrowing the contested issues before hearings.
When objections arise, we prepare oppositions, gather additional evidence, and represent clients at hearings to advocate for the requested relief. Our goal is to address concerns pragmatically, provide the court with factual clarity, and emphasize solutions that align with the settlor’s probable intent. Skilled presentation of the record and focused arguments helps the court reach a reasoned decision and often shortens the overall process compared to prolonged discovery or litigation.
After the court issues an order modifying or clarifying the trust, we assist clients with implementing the changes through updated trust documents, filings, and communications with financial institutions and title companies. This may include preparing revised trust copies, coordinating asset retitling, and advising successor trustees on their responsibilities. Proper implementation is essential to ensure that the court’s decision has practical effect and that trust administration proceeds in accordance with the modified terms.
Many institutions require certified copies of court orders and trust documents before they will transfer assets or change account ownership. We prepare and deliver the necessary certified documents, communicate with institutional representatives, and resolve administrative questions that may arise. Timely coordination helps ensure assets are managed and distributed in line with the court’s order, minimizing delays that can inconvenience beneficiaries or harm trust administration.
After a successful modification, trustees must follow the court’s directives while continuing to fulfill fiduciary duties including prudent asset management, accounting, and communication with beneficiaries. We advise trustees on implementing changes ethically and in compliance with court instructions, prepare any necessary accountings, and help address future administrative questions. Proactive guidance reduces the risk of later disputes and supports steady trust administration under the new terms.
Amending a trust and filing a trust modification petition are distinct processes that produce different types of authority. Amending a trust is typically done when the settlor is alive and the trust contains an amendment provision allowing changes without court involvement. That approach is an internal administrative action that can be efficient if permitted by the trust and agreed to by the settlor. A petition, by contrast, asks the court to modify or reform the trust when the settlor is unavailable, deceased, incapacitated, or when parties cannot reach agreement and judicial intervention is necessary to resolve competing claims. A petition creates a court order that is binding on interested parties and recognized by financial institutions and courts, providing greater finality. When parties cannot agree, or when the requested change affects rights of absent or unknown beneficiaries, filing a petition ensures proper notice and judicial oversight. The decision to pursue a petition depends on the factual situation, the trust’s terms, and whether non-judicial remedies are possible, so careful evaluation of the trust documents and circumstances is recommended.
In California, individuals who commonly file trust modification petitions include trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, and, in some cases, the settlor if seeking court confirmation or correction before death. Trustees may petition the court to clarify duties or obtain instructions, while beneficiaries typically petition to correct mistakes, remove trustees, or change distribution terms when appropriate. Courts will evaluate each petitioner’s standing and whether proper notice has been provided to other interested parties before ruling on the requested relief. The court requires that interested parties be notified so they can participate or object to proposed changes. When a person other than the settlor files a petition, courts scrutinize whether the relief requested is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent and whether it protects all beneficiaries’ rights. For this reason, having clear documentation and demonstrating why judicial intervention is necessary strengthens a petitioner’s position.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Riverside County varies depending on factors such as case complexity, the need for discovery, the number of interested parties, and court scheduling. Simple petitions that involve minor clarifications and little opposition may resolve in a few months, while contested matters involving complex factual disputes or significant assets can take longer, sometimes approaching a year or more. Local court calendars, required notice periods, and whether hearings are contested all influence the overall timeline. Early preparation helps reduce delays by ensuring the petition is complete and properly supported. Prompt service of notice, careful management of documentary evidence, and effective case management with the court can shorten the process. When settlement or mediation is possible, resolving matters outside of prolonged litigation may produce a faster outcome while conserving resources for all parties involved.
Useful evidence for trust reformation includes contemporaneous drafts of the trust, correspondence between the settlor and counsel or family members, account statements reflecting intended asset allocation, and declarations from witnesses familiar with the settlor’s intent. Documents that indicate what the settlor intended the trust to say, such as early drafts or notes, are particularly persuasive in cases alleging drafting errors. Courts weigh such extrinsic evidence to determine whether a provision failed to reflect the settlor’s objective due to mistake or oversight. In addition to documentary evidence, testimony or declarations from individuals who discussed the settlor’s wishes can be important, especially when written records are limited. Clear, credible evidence that demonstrates the settlor’s actual intent and the reason the trust’s language diverged from that intent enhances the court’s ability to grant reformation. Properly organized evidence and well-prepared declarations increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Yes, a trustee can be removed or replaced through a trust modification petition when removal is warranted by incapacity, failure to perform duties, breach of fiduciary duty, or other grounds recognized by the court. Petitioners seeking removal must present evidence showing why the trustee is unfit to continue, and they may propose a successor trustee or request that the court appoint one. Courts carefully balance the benefits of maintaining continuity with the need for competent trust administration when deciding whether to remove a trustee. Removing a trustee is a serious step and typically requires clear proof of inability or misconduct. Where possible, courts favor solutions that protect beneficiary interests with minimal disruption, such as appointing a co-trustee or successor to step in. Proper documentation of issues like missed accountings, mismanagement, or conflicts of interest strengthens the petition and supports judicial action when necessary.
Financial institutions may accept modifications implemented by an amendment properly executed by the settlor or by consent of parties, but many require court orders in contested situations or when institutions perceive uncertainty about authority. Banks, brokerage firms, and title companies often request certified copies of court orders to update account ownership, retitle assets, or recognize a new trustee. When institutions demand judicial documentation, obtaining a court order through a petition provides the certainty they need to act on account changes. If you anticipate that lenders or institutions will resist changes without judicial authorization, consider including the need for certified orders when deciding whether to file a petition. Early coordination with institutional counsel or representatives can help identify the documentation they require and reduce delays in post-order implementation of trust modifications.
Costs associated with trust modification petitions vary depending on case complexity, the need for litigation, and whether parties can reach agreement through negotiation or mediation. Simple, uncontested petitions that require minimal court time and documentation tend to be less expensive, while contested matters involving discovery, expert analysis, or multiple hearings can increase costs. Filing fees, service costs, and time spent preparing declarations and proposed orders contribute to the overall expense of a petition process. Careful case assessment and early efforts to narrow disputed issues help manage costs, and exploring settlement options can significantly reduce fees. Transparent communication about anticipated expenses and alternative strategies enables clients to make informed decisions that balance cost considerations with the importance of securing a durable resolution to trust administration issues.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed trust modification, and courts provide a process for interested parties to file responses and present opposing evidence. When an objection is filed, the court evaluates competing positions, considers the strength of the supporting documentation for each side, and may schedule hearings to assess credibility and legal arguments. Proper notice procedures ensure that beneficiaries have an opportunity to protect their rights and that the court can make a fully informed decision. Because objections can prolong the process, we encourage early communication and mediation when possible to resolve disputes without protracted litigation. Where objections are likely, preparing a robust factual and legal record in advance increases the likelihood of obtaining a favorable ruling and reduces the risk that objections will derail sensible modifications needed for sound administration.
If the settlor is still alive and wishes to change the trust, the preferred mechanism is typically an amendment or restatement executed in accordance with the trust’s amendment provisions. When the settlor has capacity, making changes directly avoids the need for court petitions and provides a straightforward route to updating terms. It is important that amendments are properly executed and witnessed as required by the trust and state law to ensure their enforceability and to prevent future disputes among beneficiaries or successor fiduciaries. If the settlor lacks capacity or is unable to act, other pathways such as a petition for reformation or court instruction may be necessary. In cases where changed circumstances or mistakes must be corrected but the settlor cannot consent, the court can review evidence and, where appropriate, authorize modifications that reflect the settlor’s probable intent while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Begin the process by gathering the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents like pour-over wills and powers of attorney, and relevant financial records. Next, consult an attorney familiar with trust matters in Riverside County to evaluate whether a petition is needed or whether a non-judicial amendment or agreement might suffice. Early legal guidance helps identify procedural requirements, potential obstacles, and the evidence likely needed to support a successful petition. If filing a petition is appropriate, prepare to provide detailed documentation, identify and notify interested parties, and work with counsel to draft a clear petition and proposed orders. Timely communication with all parties and thorough preparation of declarations and exhibits increase the chances of a favorable and efficient resolution through the court process.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas