A Heggstad petition can be a critical tool for individuals and families who need court recognition of property transfers that were intended to fund a trust but were not formally retitled. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in Sedco Hills, we assist clients in preparing the necessary filings, assembling supporting evidence, and explaining the process so they understand how a petition may confirm that assets belong to a trust. This introduction outlines the purpose of a Heggstad petition, common scenarios that lead to its use, and how the petition can help avoid protracted probate litigation or uncertainty about ownership of trust assets.
Filing a Heggstad petition typically involves presenting evidence that the decedent intended trust assets to include certain property despite defective transfer paperwork or omission of retitling. The petition seeks a judicial declaration that the property was a trust asset at death, allowing distributions to proceed under the trust terms. For families in Sedco Hills and across Riverside County, this process can prevent disputes and clarify the estate administration pathway. We prioritize clear communication, careful documentation, and court-ready pleadings to streamline resolution while protecting the rights of trustees and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition provides a legal avenue to confirm that property intended for a trust is legally part of that trust despite paperwork errors or omissions. This petition can save time and expense by avoiding a full probate proceeding for assets that were meant to pass under a trust. For trustees and fiduciaries, a successful petition clarifies title, enables orderly administration, and reduces conflict among heirs. In many cases, obtaining a court declaration through a Heggstad petition preserves the decedent’s intent and protects the interests of beneficiaries, making it an important procedural option for families resolving estate matters in Sedco Hills and the broader Riverside County area.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized estate planning and trust administration services to residents of Sedco Hills and Riverside County. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, methodical preparation of court filings, and clear client communication so families understand each step of a Heggstad petition. We handle matters involving revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, trust certifications, and other estate instruments that commonly intersect with Heggstad issues. Clients receive practical guidance tailored to their circumstances, with the goal of resolving title disputes and facilitating distribution under the decedent’s trust terms as efficiently as possible.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property belonged to a trust despite gaps in formal transfer documentation. The petition typically includes evidence such as trust documents, correspondence, bank records, deeds, affidavits, and testimony demonstrating the decedent’s intent and actions to place assets into the trust. Courts evaluate whether the transfer was intended to take effect during the decedent’s life or at death and whether the trust instrument and supporting facts justify treating the asset as a trust asset. This process often involves careful factual development and legal argument tailored to the property at issue.
Successful Heggstad petitions often depend on assembling coherent documentary and testimonial proof showing the decedent’s consistent intent to fund the trust. Evidence can include draft deeds, beneficiary designations, mortgage or escrow records, and contemporaneous correspondence. The petition must also address any competing claims and propose an appropriate remedy, such as a judicial declaration, reformation of documents, or appointment of a trustee to oversee distribution. Because each case hinges on unique facts, potential petitioners benefit from comprehensive preparation to present a persuasive and well-supported record to the court.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court action that requests a judicial declaration recognizing that property belonged to a trust despite defective transfers or omissions. The petition clarifies ownership, allowing trustees to administer and distribute assets under the trust instrument. It serves to align the property title with the decedent’s estate plan by demonstrating intent to include items in the trust. When accepted, the petition essentially corrects the administrative issue without requiring full probate, reducing administrative barriers and helping beneficiaries receive the assets intended for them under the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition must include the trust documents, a clear statement of the facts supporting trust ownership, and any relevant evidence such as deeds, account statements, or written communications. The petition should identify parties with potential interests, describe the asset and the nature of the transfer defect, and request a judicial declaration of trust ownership. The process can involve informal dispute resolution, responses from interested parties, and court hearings. Preparing witness affidavits and organizing documentary proof are essential to demonstrate the decedent’s intent and the propriety of treating the asset as trust property.
Understanding common terms helps clarify the Heggstad petition process. This glossary covers technical words you will see in pleadings and court orders, such as trustee, beneficiary, probate, title, deed, and declaration. Each term has implications for how a court evaluates ownership claims. Familiarity with these terms can make it easier to follow the petition timeline and the roles of different parties. Clear definitions also assist trustees and beneficiaries in preparing documentation and framing the legal arguments necessary to support a request for judicial recognition that property belongs to a trust.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust on behalf of beneficiaries. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to act in the beneficiaries’ best interests, maintain accurate records, and distribute trust property according to the trust instrument. In a Heggstad petition, a trustee may seek a court declaration to confirm that certain property is part of the trust, which enables administration and distribution without probate. Trustees often gather documentation and affidavits to support a petition that aligns title with the trust’s directives.
A deed is the legal instrument used to transfer ownership of real property, and title refers to the legal right to own and control that property. When a deed was never retitled into the name of a trust, the property may still be intended to be trust-owned. A Heggstad petition often addresses this discrepancy by presenting evidence that the decedent intended the property to belong to the trust despite the absence of a deed in trust name. The court can then declare the property part of the trust for administration and distribution purposes.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity entitled to receive distributions or benefits from a trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries have legal interests that can be affected by disputes over whether an asset is part of a trust. When a Heggstad petition is filed, beneficiaries may be notified and have the opportunity to object or support the petition. Resolving ownership through a court declaration can help trustees distribute property to beneficiaries in accordance with the trust document and avoid uncertainty or contested administration.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are not held in a trust or otherwise properly arranged to transfer outside probate. A Heggstad petition can reduce or eliminate the need to probate certain assets by demonstrating that they belonged to a trust at death. Avoiding probate can simplify administration, reduce public exposure of estate matters, and often shorten the timeline for distributing property to beneficiaries according to the trust.
When property intended for a trust remains improperly titled, families can choose between a Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership or proceeding through formal probate for distribution. A Heggstad petition seeks a focused judicial declaration about particular assets and can be faster and less public than a full probate administration. Probate, by contrast, is broader and may be necessary for assets that cannot be established as trust property. Evaluating the best path requires assessing documentation, the nature of the disputed assets, and the interests of interested parties to determine which process more effectively resolves ownership and facilitates distribution.
A focused Heggstad petition is often appropriate when there is clear, objective documentation showing the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust despite defective title. Examples include trust drafts, contemporaneous letters, account statements showing trust funding, and communications with advisors or agents. When such evidence is available and credible, the court may grant a declaration without opening a full probate administration. This approach can limit costs, shorten timelines, and focus the court’s attention on the specific asset or assets at issue rather than the decedent’s entire estate.
A Heggstad petition can be preferable when interested parties agree or when disputes are narrow and pertain only to title over specific assets. If family members and beneficiaries do not contest the trust ownership claim, the petition process can be relatively straightforward and largely documentary. The court will still evaluate the facts, but the absence of wide-ranging disputes reduces procedural hurdles, limits discovery, and can result in a quicker judicial determination that aligns property ownership with the trust instrument and the decedent’s intent.
A comprehensive legal approach is often necessary when title issues are complex or when multiple parties assert competing claims to an asset. In such cases, the record may require additional investigation, deposition testimony, or formal discovery to resolve factual disputes. A fuller approach can involve supplemental pleadings, contested hearings, and coordination with other estate or probate proceedings to protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries. When conflicts exist, pursuing a comprehensive strategy helps ensure all legal avenues are considered and that the court receives a complete factual basis for its ruling.
A broader strategy becomes important where Heggstad issues intersect with ongoing probate administrations, creditor claims, or disputes about the validity of the trust itself. Coordinating responses across proceedings can be complex and may require motions, status conferences, and careful timing to protect estate assets. A comprehensive approach addresses procedural coordination, potential challenges to trust terms, and resolution of creditor claims so that the court’s declaration ultimately supports orderly administration and fair distribution of assets according to the trust document and applicable law.
Adopting a comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition improves the chances of obtaining a clear judicial declaration by ensuring the petition is supported by organized, convincing evidence and thorough legal argument. This reduces the likelihood of unexpected objections or the need for supplemental filings. A well-prepared filing also helps trustees demonstrate that they have acted responsibly in assembling records and notifying interested parties. Ultimately, a complete strategy can result in a more durable court decision that facilitates administration and reduces the risk of later challenges.
A meticulous approach can also protect beneficiaries and trustees from future disputes by creating a clear record of the decedent’s intent and the evidence supporting trust ownership. When the court receives a thorough presentation, it is more likely to resolve title questions decisively, which helps trustees distribute assets with confidence. Comprehensive preparation can also minimize delays caused by supplemental discovery or corrective pleadings, and it provides a defensible position should any interested party contest the outcome after the court issues its declaration.
A well-documented Heggstad petition reduces the chance of protracted litigation by presenting the court with a clear factual record and persuasive legal rationale. By addressing potential objections and providing corroborative evidence, trustees can achieve a judicial declaration that clarifies title and facilitates distribution. Clear title reduces downstream disputes among beneficiaries and third parties, enabling the trust to operate as the decedent intended and allowing assets to pass according to the trust terms with fewer administrative impediments.
Thorough preparation helps streamline trust administration by resolving title questions promptly so trustees can proceed with asset management and distribution. When the court issues a declaration confirming trust ownership, trustees can transfer, sell, or distribute property as authorized by the trust, which reduces delays for beneficiaries awaiting their inheritances. Timely resolution also helps prevent deterioration of assets, avoids unnecessary expenses, and maintains clarity about fiduciary responsibilities during the administration process.
Begin by collecting all documents that may show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, including trust instruments, deeds, bank statements, beneficiary designations, correspondence with advisors, and any draft documents. Organize materials chronologically and summarize key facts to make it easier to present a coherent narrative to the court. Detailed documentation allows for better preparation of witness affidavits and declarations. A well-organized record can significantly strengthen the factual foundation of a Heggstad petition and reduce the need for follow-up requests for additional evidence during the court process.
Draft the petition with a clear statement of facts, a concise legal theory, and exhibits that are easy for the court to review. Include authenticated copies of documents and well-crafted affidavits that explain the decedent’s intent and the circumstances of the defective transfer. Anticipate potential objections and address them in the initial filing where appropriate. Clear, thoughtful pleadings help the court quickly grasp the essential issues and can reduce time spent on supplemental briefing or evidentiary hearings, leading to a clearer and more efficient resolution.
Families and trustees should consider a Heggstad petition when title defects threaten the efficient administration of a trust or when assets intended for a trust remain incorrectly titled. The petition provides a path to judicial recognition of trust ownership without opening a full probate administration for the asset at issue. This can preserve the decedent’s plan for distribution, protect beneficiaries’ interests, and avoid the delays and public exposure associated with probate. In many cases, a petition is a pragmatic solution that aligns the legal record with the parties’ intentions.
Additionally, pursuing a Heggstad petition can be important when creditor considerations, tax consequences, or third-party claims make resolving title issues urgent. A court declaration can clarify responsibility for debt, taxation, or transfer obligations tied to the asset. Trustees who act promptly to pursue such a petition can reduce the potential for disputes and help ensure assets are handled consistent with the trust’s terms, reducing uncertainty for beneficiaries and creating a clearer path for distribution and asset management.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include real property that was never retitled into the trust, bank accounts or investment accounts where beneficiary designations were not updated, or assets that appear to have been intended for the trust but lack clear documentary evidence. Other scenarios involve administrative oversights during life, last-minute changes, or transfers that were interrupted by the decedent’s incapacity or death. Recognizing these common patterns helps trustees and families identify when a petition is likely to be an effective remedy.
Homeowners sometimes intended to put real property into a trust but failed to record a deed transferring title into the trust name. This creates a discrepancy between the estate plan and public records, and it may leave the property subject to probate. A Heggstad petition can present the evidence showing the decedent’s intent to include the home in the trust and request a judicial declaration recognizing the property as trust property, enabling the trustee to administer or distribute the property according to the trust agreement rather than through probate.
Retirement accounts, life insurance policies, and payable-on-death accounts may have beneficiary designations that conflict with trust planning or were not updated to reflect the trust. When these designations create uncertainty about where assets should pass, a Heggstad petition can help establish the decedent’s intent and reconcile account ownership with the trust. The petition may rely on evidence such as account statements, communications with financial institutions, and related documents that indicate the decedent intended the assets to fund the trust.
Sometimes transfers intended to fund a trust were left incomplete due to the decedent’s sudden incapacity or death, leaving assets in the decedent’s name. When such gaps occur, a Heggstad petition can seek judicial recognition that the transfer was intended to take effect and that the asset should be treated as trust property. Demonstrating the timeline of events, communications, and contemporaneous actions can be critical to convincing a court that the asset belonged to the trust at the time of death.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused assistance to residents of Sedco Hills and Riverside County who face title issues related to trust funding. We help trustees and families evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, gather the necessary documentation, prepare pleadings, and navigate court procedures. Our goal is to deliver practical guidance and reliable representation to secure judicial recognition of trust ownership when warranted, helping move the administration process forward in a way that honors the decedent’s intentions and protects the interests of beneficiaries.
Choosing legal representation for a Heggstad petition matters because careful preparation and thorough documentation often determine the outcome. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we prioritize building a well-supported factual record, preparing clear pleadings, and communicating expectations to trustees and beneficiaries. Our approach is to analyze the available evidence, identify any gaps, and design a filing strategy that addresses potential objections while presenting the strongest possible case for judicial recognition of trust property.
We also focus on practical case management, notifying interested parties, and coordinating with probate matters when appropriate. Whether the issue involves real estate, financial accounts, or other property types, we work to assemble admissible evidence such as deeds, statements, and affidavits that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. This preparation helps the court reach a clear decision so trustees can proceed with administration and distribution in accordance with the trust instrument.
Finally, our office emphasizes transparent communication about timelines, costs, and likely outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. We help trustees understand the steps required, expected court procedures, and how to preserve documentary support for the petition. The goal is always to resolve title questions efficiently while safeguarding beneficiaries’ interests and completing trust administration in a manner consistent with the decedent’s plan.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to review trust documents, property records, and any available communications indicating the decedent’s intent. We then assemble evidence, identify interested parties, and prepare a detailed petition with supporting exhibits and affidavits. After filing, we manage service, handle responses, and represent the trustee at any hearings. Throughout the process we keep clients informed about procedural requirements, likely timelines, and potential outcomes so they can make decisions with a clear understanding of how the petition will affect trust administration and distributions.
The initial phase focuses on collecting relevant documents and assessing the strength of the claim that the asset belonged to the trust. We review trust instruments, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any draft instruments or retitling attempts. This assessment determines whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy or whether alternative proceedings are required. We also identify interested parties who must be notified and plan the evidence presentation to support a judicial declaration of trust ownership.
We conduct a careful review of the trust document, deeds, account paperwork, and any related correspondence to establish a factual record showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This review includes verifying dates, signatures, and any actions taken toward transferring assets. The goal is to locate persuasive documentary evidence that links the property to the trust and to identify any gaps that require supplemental affidavits or testimony to support the court filing.
We identify individuals who can provide sworn statements or testimony regarding the decedent’s intent, such as family members, advisors, or trustees who discussed or handled trust funding. Gathering witness statements early helps build a coherent narrative and ensures affidavits are drafted while recollections remain clear. We also gather institutional records like bank endorsements or escrow communications that corroborate the decedent’s efforts to fund the trust, providing a strong evidentiary foundation for the petition.
After assembling the factual record, we draft a court-ready petition that sets out the legal basis for declaring the asset part of the trust and attaches supporting exhibits and affidavits. The petition identifies interested parties, articulates the relevant facts and law, and requests a judicial declaration. We file the petition with the appropriate probate court in Riverside County and handle the service of process required to notify all parties with potential interests in the asset.
Pleadings are drafted to present the facts clearly and concisely, with exhibits organized to make the court’s review efficient. Affidavits and declarations authenticate key documents and explain the decedent’s intent and actions. Careful drafting anticipates common objections and frames the requested relief in terms that the court can grant without unnecessary delay. The filing package aims to minimize ambiguity and provide the court with a full record to evaluate the trust ownership claim.
After filing, we manage the formal service process to notify beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties. We monitor for responsive pleadings, evaluate any objections, and handle meet-and-confer efforts to narrow disputes where possible. If objections arise, we prepare responsive briefs and coordinate evidentiary support for any hearings. Managing responses efficiently helps limit procedural delay and guides the case toward a timely judicial determination.
If the matter proceeds to a contested hearing, we present the documentary record and witness testimony to the probate court and argue why the asset should be declared part of the trust. The court evaluates the evidence, hears arguments from interested parties, and then issues a ruling. A favorable decision results in a judicial declaration that clarifies asset ownership for trust administration. We then assist with implementing the court’s order so trustees can manage or distribute the asset according to the trust.
At hearing, the focus is on explaining the timeline and documentary support that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, and on addressing any contrary evidence or legal objections. Testimony from witnesses and authenticated exhibits help the court determine whether the asset belonged to the trust at the relevant time. We prioritize clear presentation and legal argument that aligns the facts with applicable case law and statutes governing trust property recognition.
After the court issues a declaration, we assist trustees in implementing the order by updating title records, instructing financial institutions, and guiding distributions in accordance with the trust terms. We also ensure the necessary filings are completed to effectuate transfers or retitling when required. This final phase ensures that the court’s decision translates into practical results, enabling trustees to follow through on administration tasks and beneficiaries to receive their trust distributions.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court request to recognize that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust despite defects in how title was transferred or recorded. The petition asks the court to declare that the asset belonged to the trust at the time of the decedent’s death so it can be administered and distributed according to the trust terms rather than through probate. It is commonly used when deeds, account retitling, or beneficiary designations do not reflect the decedent’s clear intent to fund the trust, and when documentary and testimonial evidence can support that intent. This remedy focuses on specific assets and is intended to align the legal record with the decedent’s estate plan. The court will consider all submitted evidence, including trust agreements, account statements, deeds, and witness statements. If the record supports the claim, the court may issue a declaration that clarifies ownership. The petition is a targeted remedy that can avoid broader probate administration for the asset in question when the facts support treating the property as trust-owned.
The duration of a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the factual record, the volume of evidence, and whether interested parties object. In straightforward cases with well-documented proof and no disputes, the process can be resolved in a matter of months from filing to decision. If the petition faces objections, requires additional discovery, or involves contested hearings, the timeline can extend considerably, often taking several months to over a year before a final ruling is issued. Proactive preparation and clear communication with interested parties can help shorten the process. Gathering complete documentation, preparing thorough affidavits, and anticipating common objections reduce the need for supplemental pleadings or extended evidentiary proceedings. Working diligently to organize the factual record and promptly responding to any challenges helps move the matter efficiently through the probate court system.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition commonly includes the trust instrument, draft deeds or recorded but conflicting deeds, contemporaneous correspondence showing intent to fund the trust, bank or escrow statements reflecting attempts to transfer assets, and beneficiary designation forms. Affidavits from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s expressed intent or actions taken to retitle property are also important. Documentary and testimonial evidence together create the persuasive factual narrative the court needs to evaluate whether the asset should be treated as trust property. The credibility and coherence of the evidence matter greatly. Documents that corroborate each other and timelines that demonstrate consistent intent strengthen the petition. Financial institution records, escrow communications, and written notes related to the trust funding are particularly persuasive when they align with the trust terms and the decedent’s actions, making it more likely the court will grant the requested declaration.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not automatically initiate a full probate administration for the decedent’s estate; it is a targeted request to the probate court concerning ownership of specific assets. The petition seeks a declaration that certain property belonged to a trust at the decedent’s death, which, if granted, allows trustees to administer those assets under the trust’s terms. However, the court’s involvement is still within the probate court system because those courts oversee trust and estate matters in many jurisdictions. In some situations, the Heggstad petition may intersect with other probate proceedings, such as an ongoing administration or creditor claims. If there are competing claims or unresolved estate matters, coordination between proceedings may be necessary. The petition’s goal, though, is to clarify ownership for particular assets and thereby reduce the need for broader probate administration for those items.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties have the right to object to a Heggstad petition. The court will provide notice to parties with a potential interest, who can then file responses asserting their positions. Objections commonly challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, dispute the decedent’s intent, or present competing legal theories regarding ownership. When objections arise, the court may schedule hearings or require additional evidence to resolve factual disputes before issuing a declaration. When objections are likely, preparing a strong initial record becomes even more important. Collecting corroborating documents, securing credible witness statements, and anticipating likely defenses helps address objections effectively. Engaging in early communication with interested parties may also reduce opposition or narrow contested issues, allowing the court to resolve the matter more efficiently once the petition is filed.
Costs to file a Heggstad petition in Riverside County include court filing fees, service fees for notifying interested parties, and potential costs for obtaining certified documents or expert records from institutions. Legal fees vary depending on the complexity of the case, the volume of necessary documentation, and whether the petition is contested. In straightforward matters, fees may be lower, whereas contested proceedings requiring hearings, discovery, or extensive briefing will increase legal costs due to additional preparation and court appearances. Estimating the total cost requires assessing the specific facts of each case and the likely level of opposition. We provide transparent discussions about anticipated fees and propose efficient strategies tailored to the client’s goals. Understanding the likely scope of work and potential court costs in advance helps trustees plan for the expenses associated with resolving title issues through a Heggstad petition.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset in question remains outside the trust for the time being and may be subject to probate administration or other claims. A denial can occur when the evidence does not sufficiently demonstrate the decedent’s intent to include the property in the trust, or when legal standards for the declaration are not met. In that event, trustees and beneficiaries must evaluate alternative options such as initiating probate for the asset, pursuing settlement negotiations with interested parties, or, if appropriate, filing an appeal to challenge the decision. A careful post-decision review is important to determine next steps. If an appeal is considered, timing and procedural rules must be observed. Alternatively, parties may use the decision as a basis for negotiating a resolution or for undertaking steps to retitle assets where possible. A tailored plan helps clients move forward while protecting estate and beneficiary interests consistent with applicable legal remedies.
A Heggstad petition can apply to a variety of asset types, not only real property. Bank accounts, investment accounts, retirement assets, and insurance proceeds are often implicated when beneficiary designations or account titles did not reflect trust planning. The petition asks the court to recognize that these assets were intended to be controlled by the trust despite documentation defects. Each asset type may require different supporting records—such as account statements, designation forms, or institutional correspondence—to demonstrate the decedent’s intent and the steps taken toward funding the trust. While the underlying legal concept is similar across asset classes, the evidentiary needs can vary. Real property commonly requires deeds and title records, whereas financial accounts may rely on statements, beneficiary forms, and bank communications. Collecting the appropriate documentation for each asset type strengthens the petition and makes it more likely the court will grant the requested declaration.
After a successful Heggstad petition, the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, and trustees should follow up to align public records and account registrations with that ruling. This may involve recording the court order with the county recorder for real estate, informing financial institutions, and updating account ownership or beneficiary listings when permitted. Implementing the court’s order ensures title records and institutional accounts reflect the trust’s control over the asset and helps trustees carry out administration and distribution in accordance with the trust terms. Taking these administrative steps promptly reduces the risk of future confusion or disputes and helps finalize the practical effects of the court’s ruling. Trustees should retain certified copies of court orders and related filings to present to institutions or title companies when effecting transfers, sales, or distributions. Clear documentation of the court’s decision makes it easier to complete the necessary transactional follow-through.
To start a Heggstad petition, gather the trust document, any deeds, account statements, correspondence, beneficiary designations, and notes that may show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in Sedco Hills to schedule an initial review. During intake we will examine the records, identify any gaps, recommend evidence that can bolster the petition, and outline the likely process and timelines for filing and court resolution. From there, we will prepare the petition and supporting affidavits, coordinate service on interested parties, and submit the filing to the appropriate Riverside County probate court. We will continue to manage correspondence, respond to objections if any arise, and represent the trustee at hearings, guiding the case toward a resolution that clarifies title and enables proper trust administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas