A Heggstad petition can resolve problems when a decedent intended assets to be held in a trust but the title was never retitled into that trust. Residents of Wildomar and surrounding areas in Riverside County turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for focused assistance with these matters. We help families determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, gather supporting documentation, and represent them through court filings and hearings. This introduction explains the basics of a Heggstad petition, why it matters for trust administration, and what to expect when pursuing a court order to transfer assets into a trust after someone passes away.
When a decedent executed a trust but some assets remained in their individual name, beneficiaries and trustees may face legal and administrative hurdles. A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain assets were intended to be part of the trust despite the lack of formal retitling. This process can prevent full probate administration for those assets, potentially reducing delay and expense for beneficiaries. Our firm provides practical guidance on assembling evidence, preparing the petition, and pursuing the court order needed to align asset ownership with the decedent s documented estate plan and the trust s terms.
A Heggstad petition is important because it can restore the intended control of assets to a trust and its successor trustee, helping beneficiaries avoid separate probate proceedings for those assets. By securing a court order that recognizes trust ownership, families can expedite asset distribution and reduce administrative friction. The petition relies on documentary evidence and testimony showing the decedent s intent, and when successful it allows assets to be administered under the trust s terms. For trustees and beneficiaries in Wildomar, pursuing a Heggstad petition can preserve privacy, limit formal probate involvement, and clarify legal title so property can be transferred or managed according to the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on estate planning services for clients across Riverside County, including Wildomar. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, wills, and asset records to determine the strongest path forward when title issues arise. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, banks, and other institutions to gather affidavits, deeds, account statements, and other proof of intent. The firm s goal is to present a clear, persuasive petition to the probate court that demonstrates the decedent s plan and secures a lawful transfer of assets to the trust while minimizing cost and delay for family members.
A Heggstad petition is a specific probate procedure in California that asks the court to determine that property should have been transferred to a trust even though formal title changes were not completed before death. The petition typically includes evidence such as the trust document, related wills, beneficiary designations, statements from the trustee, and records showing the decedent s intent to fund the trust. The court evaluates all evidence and may issue an order recognizing trust ownership, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute the property in accordance with the trust terms. This remedy helps avoid separate probate administration for those assets.
Understanding the standards a court uses is key to preparing a successful petition. The Heggstad petition requires demonstration of clear and convincing evidence or a preponderance of the evidence, depending on the circumstances, that the decedent intended the asset to be owned by the trust. Evidence can include signed trust documents, contemporaneous notes, beneficiary designations that align with the trust, deeds, or bank records. The process may require declarations from witnesses and careful coordination with institutions holding the property. An effective petition anticipates the questions a judge will raise and addresses them with thorough documentation and reasoned legal arguments.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used when assets intended for a trust were never formally retitled into the trust before the decedent died. The remedy developed from case law requires the petitioner to show that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. When successful, the court issues an order recognizing that the asset belongs to the trust, enabling the trustee to control, manage, or distribute it under the trust s terms rather than subjecting it to separate probate. This petition is commonly used for bank accounts, vehicles, or real property that remained in the decedent s individual name.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on gathering and presenting documentation that shows intent to fund the trust, such as the trust agreement, related wills, deeds, account statements, and communications reflecting the decedent s instructions. The process begins with a careful asset review to identify items not titled to the trust, followed by drafting the petition and supporting declarations. After filing, the court reviews the petition and may schedule a hearing. The judge considers the totality of evidence and issues an order if convinced the asset was meant to be held by the trust. Court timelines and requirements vary, so clear preparation is essential.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate a Heggstad petition. This glossary explains phrases you ll encounter during the process, such as trust funding, petition, decedent, trustee, beneficiary, and court order. Knowing these terms will help you gather the necessary documentation and follow the legal steps. It will also support clearer communication with financial institutions and the court. The following terms and definitions are focused on practical meaning for someone preparing or responding to a Heggstad petition in Riverside County and provide a baseline for conversations with legal counsel.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership of assets from an individual into a trust so that the trust holds legal title. Proper funding aligns asset ownership with the trust document and ensures the trustee can manage or distribute property per the trust s terms after the grantor s death. When funding is incomplete, certain assets may remain in the decedent s name, prompting the need for corrective measures like a Heggstad petition. Evidence of intent to fund, such as recorded deeds or account statements, supports the argument that an asset should be treated as trust property.
A petition to establish trust ownership is the court filing used to request recognition that an asset belongs to a trust despite its title remaining in the decedent s name. It sets out facts and evidence demonstrating the decedent s intent to transfer the asset to the trust. The petition typically includes the trust document, related testamentary instruments, declarations from the trustee or witnesses, and records that connect the asset to the trust funding plan. The court considers the petition and may issue an order that clarifies title and authorizes the trustee to act.
Decedent s intent focuses on proving what the person who created the trust actually planned for their assets. In Heggstad matters, the central question is whether the decedent meant for certain property to be part of the trust. Courts look for contemporaneous documents, consistent beneficiary designations, communications, or conduct that shows the decedent intended transfer. Demonstrating intent allows the court to correct the title and prevent separate probate. Gathering multiple forms of corroborating evidence strengthens the case that the asset should be treated as trust property.
A court order recognizing trust ownership is the formal judgment a probate court issues when it finds sufficient evidence that particular assets belong to a trust despite not being retitled. Once entered, the order directs how the property should be handled by the trustee and can be presented to financial institutions or recorders to clear title. This judicial determination helps complete trust administration, allowing distribution or management of assets under the trust s provisions while avoiding separate probate proceedings for those items.
When assets intended for a trust remain untitled, there are different legal paths to consider. One option is a Heggstad petition to the probate court seeking recognition of trust ownership. Another path may involve a traditional probate administration for those assets, which can be lengthier and more public. In some cases, institutions will accept affidavits or ancillary documents to transfer assets without a formal proceeding, though that often depends on the institution s policies. We help clients evaluate these options, weighing timing, cost, privacy, and the likelihood of success based on the evidence available.
For smaller accounts or assets, some banks, brokerages, and institutions will accept a combination of the trust instrument, death certificate, and an affidavit from the trustee to transfer assets without a court order. This approach can be faster and less expensive than filing a petition, but it depends on the bank s policies and the clarity of the documentation. When institutions are willing to cooperate, trustees may resolve title issues through administrative measures. Evaluating whether a limited approach will work requires contacting the holders, reviewing their requirements, and providing thorough documentation to avoid disputes.
If there is clear, unambiguous documentary evidence that the decedent funded the trust or intended to fund a specific asset, then certain institutions may proceed with transfer based on that proof. Examples include a recorded deed naming the trust as intended owner or account paperwork that directly references the trust. In these situations, presenting consistent records and trustee declarations may suffice to correct title without court intervention. Nonetheless, even when documentary proof appears strong, some institutions require a court order, so preparing for that possibility remains prudent.
Complex title histories, competing beneficiary claims, or ambiguous documentation may require a full Heggstad petition and courtroom review to secure clear title. When banks, title companies, or family members dispute ownership or the decedent s intent is not plainly documented, a comprehensive approach that includes legal research, evidence collection, and court advocacy becomes necessary. This method ensures the trustee s position is thoroughly supported by declarations, documentary evidence, and legal argument so the probate judge can confidently issue an order recognizing trust ownership.
Seeking a court order can provide finality and reduce the risk of future challenges to title or distribution decisions. When assets are transferred administratively without judicial recognition, parties later might contest ownership or allocations, which could reopen disputes. A comprehensive legal approach secures a judicial determination addressing ownership questions, which then becomes part of the public record and carries the authority of the court. This protects trustees and beneficiaries by establishing a formal resolution that third parties are more likely to accept.
A formal Heggstad petition brings the clarity of a court judgment, which helps trustees obtain clear title and complete trust administration according to the trust document. The order can be used to convince banks, recorders, and third parties of the trust s ownership. Pursuing the petition can limit later disputes by creating a judicial finding that addresses ownership and the decedent s intent. While litigation or court proceedings carry costs, the long-term certainty provided by an order often outweighs the expense, particularly where property values are significant or family disagreements could arise.
Another benefit of a formal petition is the structured process for evaluating evidence and allowing interested parties an opportunity to be heard. This transparency can reduce the likelihood of surprise challenges and establishes a clear record explaining court conclusions. For trustees, that record simplifies interactions with title companies and government agencies, and it provides a defensible basis for distributions. Working through the court also ensures that timelines and notice requirements are met, preventing later procedural objections that could undermine administrative transfers.
A court order recognizing trust ownership carries authority and enforceability that administrative transfers may lack. Once a judge issues an order after review of a Heggstad petition, that decision provides legal clarity and can be relied upon by trustees in managing or distributing assets. The order reduces ambiguity and supports a trustee s decisions in the face of future questions. For families in Wildomar and across Riverside County, that finality helps preserve relationships by minimizing continued disputes and ensuring the decedent s intent is honored under clear judicial guidance.
A formal order from the probate court often makes financial institutions and title companies more willing to process transfers, release funds, or reissue title documents. These entities frequently require judicial documentation to resolve complex ownership questions and protect themselves from liability. Presenting a court order simplifies administrative dealings and helps ensure the trustee can access accounts, sell or transfer property, and distribute assets in accordance with the trust. This streamlined cooperation reduces delays and administrative obstacles that might otherwise prolong estate administration.
Begin by compiling all relevant documents such as the trust agreement, related wills, deeds, account statements, and any communications reflecting the decedent s intent. Early collection of these records reduces the risk of losing critical evidence and saves time during the petition preparation stage. Contact banks, title companies, and other record keepers to request statements and historical records. The more comprehensive the documentation, the higher the likelihood of convincing the court that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. Early organization also helps keep family members informed and reduces uncertainty.
When preparing a petition, create well-structured declarations that explain the decedent s estate plan, the steps taken to fund the trust, and the reasons title was not changed for certain assets. A chronological account of the decedent s actions and relevant dates helps the court understand the sequence of events and supports the claim of intent. Include supporting exhibits, such as copies of the trust, deeds, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence. Clear, organized evidence builds credibility and makes it easier for a judge to reach the decision that the asset belongs to the trust.
Consider a Heggstad petition if you are a trustee or beneficiary facing assets that were meant to be in a trust but remain titled in the decedent s name. Filing can prevent separate probate for those assets and ensure they are administered under the trust s distribution plan. The petition offers a legal pathway to align ownership with the decedent s documented intentions, which helps reduce delays and confusion. For families in Wildomar, securing a judicial determination can be particularly valuable when dealing with banks, title companies, or potential disputes among heirs.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is to preserve privacy and minimize administrative hurdles. Probate proceedings are public, but resolving ownership through a Heggstad order ties the asset to the trust administration and can streamline the process. When assets are significant in value or when family relationships might complicate voluntary transfers, a court order provides legal certainty. Clients often choose this approach to protect the trustee from future challenges and to ensure distributions proceed according to the trust rather than through an alternative probate process.
Typical scenarios include recently created trusts where the grantor did not retitle bank accounts or a deed before death, beneficiary designations that were not updated to match trust intentions, or assets acquired shortly before death. Mistakes during estate transitions, oversight when funding a trust, or transactions that were started but not completed can leave assets untitled. Family members and trustees often encounter these issues while attempting to close out the decedent s estate, prompting review and potential filing of a Heggstad petition to secure a court order recognizing trust ownership.
Real property that was intended to be held by a trust but remained titled in the decedent s name is a common circumstance requiring judicial resolution. This can happen when a deed transfer was prepared but not recorded, or when the grantor believed the property had been retitled but paperwork was never completed. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize that the property was intended to be owned by the trust, allowing the trustee to manage or convey the real estate under the trust s directives. The petition must include deeds, trust documents, and relevant supporting statements.
Bank accounts and investment accounts are often overlooked during trust funding. When beneficiary designations or account registration were not updated to reflect trust ownership, financial institutions may refuse to transfer funds without a court order. A Heggstad petition can address these situations by demonstrating the grantor s intent and requesting the court s determination that the accounts belong to the trust. Collecting account statements, trust documents, and declarations from the trustee or institution representatives is a central part of preparing a convincing petition.
Assets purchased or acquired shortly before death may not have been retitled into the trust due to timing. These assets often present strong arguments for a Heggstad petition when there is contemporaneous evidence showing the grantor intended them to be part of the trust. Receipts, purchase agreements, and communications about estate plans can support a claim of intent. A successful petition for recently acquired assets allows the trustee to incorporate those items into trust administration rather than subjecting them to separate probate proceedings.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides Heggstad petition services to residents of Wildomar and nearby areas in Riverside County. We assist trustees, beneficiaries, and family members by reviewing estate planning documents, identifying untitled assets, and advising on the best route to secure clear title. Our work includes drafting the petition, preparing declarations and exhibits, filing with the probate court, and representing clients at hearings. Call 408-528-2827 to arrange a consultation to discuss your situation and explore the most effective approach to resolve untitled trust assets.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for our thorough document review, methodical approach to evidence gathering, and focused courtroom preparation. We aim to present petitions that clearly demonstrate the decedent s intent and meet the court s expectations, reducing the chance of objections or delays. Our team communicates with banks and title companies on your behalf and prepares detailed declarations and exhibits to support your position. We tailor our approach to each family s circumstances to achieve efficient and reliable resolution of untitled trust assets.
Our firm emphasizes clear timelines and transparent cost estimates so clients understand the steps involved and what to expect from the court process. We prepare petitions that are organized and persuasive, including chronologies, copies of relevant instruments, and declarations that explain the facts in a coherent manner. Where possible, we attempt to secure administrative transfers to save time and expense, but we are prepared to pursue court orders when necessary to protect trustee interests and beneficiaries rights. Our goal is to reduce stress and uncertainty for families during a difficult time.
We also focus on practical solutions tailored to Riverside County procedures and Wildomar area considerations, ensuring filings meet local court rules and notice requirements. The firm is experienced in presenting petitions that address the concerns likely to arise from banks, title companies, and interested heirs. From initial case assessment through the final order, we keep clients informed and prepared for hearings or follow-up steps so trust administration can proceed with the least possible disruption to beneficiaries.
Our process begins with an initial consultation to review the trust, related documents, and the assets that appear untitled. We then identify required evidence, request records from institutions, and prepare a detailed petition and supporting declarations. After filing with the probate court, we provide notice to interested parties and prepare for any hearing. If the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, we assist with presenting the order to banks and recorders to finalize transfers. Throughout, we communicate next steps, timelines, and likely costs so clients know what to expect.
The initial step involves a thorough review of the trust documents, the decedent s will, deeds, account statements, and any records suggesting the grantor s intention to fund the trust. We identify assets that were not retitled and determine which items require a petition. This phase includes requesting records from banks, title companies, and other custodians, interviewing witnesses if needed, and preparing a chronology of relevant events. Clear assessment at the outset shapes a practical plan for either administrative resolution or court petition.
Collecting trust documents, deeds, account statements, and related records is essential for showing intent to transfer assets to the trust. We create a file that includes the trust instrument, any pour-over wills, beneficiary designation forms, and copies of title or account statements. Where documents are missing, we work to obtain certified copies or records from banks and recorders. This organized file forms the backbone of any petition and helps demonstrate the decedent s consistent intent to place assets under the trust s control.
After assembling records, we evaluate their strength in supporting a Heggstad petition and identify potential objections, such as competing claims or ambiguous paperwork. We assess whether the institution holding the asset might accept an administrative transfer or whether a court order is likely required. Anticipating obstacles allows us to gather additional supporting declarations and prepare the arguments necessary to persuade the court. This careful evaluation reduces surprises and positions the petition for a favorable outcome.
In step two, we draft the petition and supporting documents, including clear declarations, exhibits, and a chronological explanation of events. The petition sets out the legal basis for recognizing the trust s ownership and attaches the documentary evidence supporting that position. We file the petition in the appropriate Riverside County probate court and comply with all notice requirements to interested parties. Once filed, we monitor the court schedule and prepare for any responses or hearings requested by other parties.
Declarations from the trustee and other witnesses should present facts in a straightforward manner and attach supporting exhibits such as copies of the trust, deeds, and account statements. We focus on creating declarations that explain the timeline, the decedent s expressed intentions, and any steps taken to fund the trust. Well-crafted exhibits that are properly labeled and organized make it easier for the court to review the petition and reach a determination in favor of recognizing trust ownership.
After filing, we serve interested parties and allow time for any objections. If objections arise, we respond with supplemental declarations or legal briefing to address contested issues. The court may set a hearing where we present the evidence and argue why the order recognizing trust ownership is appropriate. Preparing for objections in advance improves the chances of resolving challenges efficiently and securing a favorable ruling that clarifies ownership for the trustee and beneficiaries.
If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it will issue an order recognizing trust ownership for the specified assets. With that order in hand, we assist in presenting it to banks, recorders, and title companies to finalize transfers and clear title issues. This step completes the legal recognition needed for the trustee to manage or distribute assets under the trust. We follow through with any administrative filings or recordings necessary to ensure the court s order achieves its intended practical effect for the estate or trust administration.
Practical completion often requires presenting the signed court order to institutions holding the assets. We prepare certified copies, appropriate cover letters, and follow-up contacts to ensure banks or recorders accept the order and process the requested title changes. This coordination helps convert the judicial decision into effective control by the trustee and enables distributions or asset management under the trust terms. Prompt follow-through reduces delays and ensures the trustee can proceed with administration tasks.
Once institutions accept the order, we assist with final administrative duties, such as re-recording deeds, updating account registrations, and advising trustees on distributing assets according to the trust. We also document the actions taken to create a clear record of compliance with the court order. These final steps complete the trust funding process and help beneficiaries receive their inheritances without unnecessary delay. Clear documentation also provides protection against future disputes about how assets were handled.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property even though they remained in the decedent s name at death. This remedy is used when a trust was intended to hold the assets but formal retitling was not completed. The petition presents documents and declarations showing the decedent s intent, allowing the court to issue an order that aligns legal title with the trust and permits the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust s provisions. You may need a Heggstad petition if institutions refuse to transfer assets administratively or if there are competing claims to property that prevent simple resolution. Filing the petition helps avoid separate probate for those assets and creates a formal record that clarifies ownership. When evidence clearly supports the trust funding intention, the court can provide the authority needed to complete transfers and allow trust administration to proceed.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on case complexity, court schedules, and whether objections arise. Initial case review and document collection can take several weeks, while the court s processing and hearing schedule may add additional months. In Riverside County, some matters move more quickly when documentation is straightforward and no parties object, while contested cases take longer. We advise clients during the initial assessment on realistic timelines based on the current local court calendar and the strength of the evidence. Preparing thorough petitions and working proactively to address potential objections can shorten overall time to resolution. Promptly obtaining institutional records, declarations, and properly organized exhibits helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently. After a hearing, if the judge issues an order recognizing trust ownership, the final administrative transfers may also take several weeks as banks and recorders process the court s directions.
The most important evidence includes the trust instrument, any pour-over will, deeds, account statements indicating intended trust ownership, and contemporaneous communications or notes reflecting the decedent s intent. Declarations from the trustee and witnesses who can attest to the decedent s actions or statements are also highly valuable. Where available, recorded deeds or beneficiary designations consistent with the trust add strong support for the petition. A clear chronological presentation of these records is essential to persuade the court. Additional helpful materials include institutional correspondence, copies of transfer paperwork that was prepared but not recorded, and receipts for recently acquired property showing the grantor s intention. Combining documentary evidence with sworn declarations that explain the facts in a coherent narrative increases the likelihood that the court will recognize the asset as trust property.
A Heggstad petition can address specific assets that were intended to be part of a trust but not retitled. It is most effective for individual items identified in the petition where evidence shows the decedent s intention to transfer ownership. However, it does not automatically avoid probate for all of the decedent s assets; only the assets recognized by the court as trust property will be administered under the trust rather than through separate probate. Other assets may still need probate if they were not intended for the trust or lack supporting evidence. For comprehensive avoidance of probate across an entire estate, proper trust funding during the grantor s lifetime is the most reliable method. When gaps exist, Heggstad petitions provide a targeted remedy for specific assets, helping trustees and beneficiaries reduce the scope and expense of probate in many cases when sufficient proof of intent is available.
Yes. Financial institutions and title companies commonly accept a signed court order recognizing trust ownership as authority to transfer assets or retitle property. After a court issues an order, the trustee can present certified copies along with required paperwork to banks or recorders to process title changes, distributions, or account transfers. Institutions often prefer a judicial determination because it reduces their risk in releasing funds or reissuing title. The speed at which institutions comply varies, and some may have internal procedures that require additional documentation. We assist clients in presenting the order correctly and following up with institutions to ensure acceptance and completion of the necessary administrative steps to effect the transfer.
Common objections include claims that the decedent did not intend the asset to be part of the trust, competing beneficiary assertions, or questions about the authenticity of documents. These objections are handled by submitting supplemental declarations, clarifying documentary evidence, and, if necessary, presenting testimony at a hearing. The court evaluates all evidence and weighs witness credibility and documentary proof when resolving disputes. Anticipating likely objections during petition preparation can reduce surprises and strengthen the presentation. When contesting parties appear, careful legal briefing and organized exhibits help address factual disputes and legal arguments. We work to reconcile differences where possible through dialogue and documentation, but when disputes persist we present the case to the court with clear, focused evidence that supports recognition of trust ownership.
Yes. When filing a Heggstad petition, the rules generally require notice to interested parties, including heirs, beneficiaries, and sometimes creditors, depending on the nature of the assets and local court rules. Proper service ensures that potential claimants have an opportunity to object and that the court s eventual order is less likely to be challenged on procedural grounds. Compliance with notice rules protects the validity of the court s decision and prevents later arguments that parties were not given a fair chance to be heard. We handle the notice process to ensure all required parties receive proper service and documentation. This includes preparing service packets, filing proof of service with the court, and advising clients on who must be notified. Proper notice also helps maintain transparent communication with family members and reduces the chance of surprise disputes down the line.
Yes. A Heggstad petition can be used for assets acquired shortly before death if there is evidence the decedent intended them to be part of the trust. Contemporaneous documents such as purchase agreements, deed drafts, payment receipts, and communications discussing the estate plan strengthen the argument of intent. The court will evaluate whether the evidence collectively demonstrates that the grantor intended the asset to be held by the trust even though formal retitling was not completed before passing. Timely documentation and clear declarations are particularly important for recently acquired assets, because the sequence of events and the grantor s expressed intentions are central to the court s determination. Preparing a strong factual narrative supported by exhibits increases the likelihood that the court will recognize trust ownership for these items.
Costs vary with the complexity of the petition, the number and types of assets involved, and whether objections arise. Generally, a Heggstad petition can be less costly than a full probate administration for equivalent assets because it seeks relief limited to specific items rather than opening an entire probate estate. However, when contested or when numerous assets require court action, fees and court costs increase. We provide an assessment during the initial consultation to estimate likely expenses and to explore administrative alternatives where feasible to reduce cost. The overall value often derives from the long-term certainty a court order provides, particularly for significant assets where future disputes would be expensive. We aim to balance cost considerations with the benefits of achieving clear title and minimizing future litigation risk for trustees and beneficiaries.
To start the process with the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, contact our office at 408-528-2827 to schedule an initial consultation. During that meeting we review your trust documents, any wills, relevant account statements, deeds, and other records. We discuss which assets appear untitled, the likely evidence available, and the procedural steps needed to seek court recognition of trust ownership. This assessment helps determine whether a Heggstad petition or an administrative transfer is the best path forward. After the consultation, we work with you to gather documents, prepare declarations, and reach out to institutions to obtain required records. We then draft and file the petition if court action is necessary, handle required service and notice, and represent you in court proceedings. Throughout the process we keep clients informed about timelines and next steps to complete trust administration efficiently.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas