If your family trust no longer reflects your intentions because circumstances, law, or relationships have changed, a trust modification petition may be the solution. Residents of Carmichael and the surrounding Sacramento County communities frequently turn to local estate planning counsel to evaluate whether a petition to modify, reform, or clarify a trust is appropriate. The process can address drafting errors, changed beneficiary needs, outdated distribution terms, or tax planning adjustments. Our office provides clear guidance about when a court filing is needed, what evidence is helpful, and how the process affects trustees, beneficiaries, and the overall administration of the trust, helping clients make informed decisions about their estate plan.
Deciding to pursue a trust modification petition is a significant legal step that often involves balancing family dynamics, tax consequences, and the settlor’s original intent. In many situations, informal amendments are insufficient because the trust instrument lacks amendment authority, or the change affects third parties or creditor rights. Petitioning the superior court in Sacramento County can provide a formal resolution and legal clarity. We assist clients through the initial evaluation, drafting the petition, assembling supporting declarations and documentation, and representing their interests in hearings when necessary, all with the goal of preserving assets and honoring the settlor’s reasonable expectations under current circumstances.
A trust modification petition provides a formal process to correct mistakes, adapt to changed circumstances, and resolve ambiguities that could otherwise lead to disputes. Bringing a petition to court can clarify trustee powers, revise outdated distribution terms, or accommodate unforeseen beneficiary needs, such as disability or incapacity. For families with blended assets, retirement accounts, or complex property arrangements, a court-supervised modification can reduce the risk of future litigation and give trustees and beneficiaries a clear legal framework to follow. The result is greater certainty in administration, better alignment with current goals, and a documented record of the court’s approval to rely on going forward.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California, including Carmichael and Sacramento County, focusing on comprehensive estate planning matters such as trust revisions, wills, and related estate documents. Our firm offers practical, client-centered representation that emphasizes clear communication and careful documentation. We guide individuals and families through the legal standards for petitioning to modify or reform a trust, help gather necessary evidence like declarations and trust records, and coordinate with financial or tax professionals as needed to address secondary impacts. Our goal is to help clients achieve durable, legally defensible results that reflect current circumstances and long-term intentions.
A trust modification petition is a court filing used to request changes to an existing trust when informal amendment is unavailable or inappropriate. Reasons for filing can include clerical mistakes in drafting, unintended consequences from ambiguous language, changed family circumstances, or new legal or tax considerations. The court reviews the petition along with supporting evidence to determine whether modification, reformation, or clarification is warranted under relevant California trust statutes and case law. The process often requires careful factual development, such as communications with the settlor, contemporaneous notes, or proof of mistaken terms, to demonstrate that the requested change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent or is necessary to effectuate the trust’s purpose.
Filing a petition typically involves preparing a formal petition, supporting declarations, proposed orders, and providing notice to interested parties, including beneficiaries and trustees. Courts will consider whether proposed changes impact creditor rights or third-party interests, and whether notice and consent procedures were properly followed. When parties agree, the process can be streamlined; when disputes arise, hearings may be required to resolve competing interpretations. Timing considerations and local court rules in Sacramento County also influence strategy, so early consultation and careful preparation are important to manage procedural requirements and to present a persuasive factual and legal record to the court.
A trust modification petition is a request to the probate or superior court to change, reform, or clarify the terms of a trust instrument. It can be used to correct accidental omissions or drafting errors, to reflect the settlor’s actual intent when language is ambiguous, or to adapt trust provisions to changed circumstances that could not be foreseen when the trust was created. The court’s role is to examine evidence and apply legal standards to determine whether a modification is legally permissible and properly supported. The petition provides a formal, enforceable resolution that trustees and beneficiaries can rely on to guide administration and distributions.
Successful trust modification petitions typically include a clear statement of the requested change, a factual record supporting why the change is needed, proof of notice to interested parties, and legal arguments grounded in California law. Essential components are the petition itself, declarations from knowledgeable witnesses or parties, copies of the trust instrument and related documents, and a proposed order for the judge’s signature. The process also requires complying with local rules for filing and service, evaluating potential creditor issues, and, where possible, seeking voluntary agreement from interested parties to avoid contested litigation and preserve family relationships.
Understanding common terms makes the petition process less intimidating. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, modification, Heggstad petition, pour-over will, and notice are frequently used in court filings and legal discussions. Below are concise definitions to help clarify language you will encounter in petitions and court papers. Familiarity with these concepts assists clients in providing relevant facts and documents and in making informed choices about the scope of relief they seek in a trust modification proceeding.
The settlor is the person who creates the trust and transfers assets into it. The settlor’s intent at the time of creating the trust is a central consideration in many modification petitions, particularly those seeking reformation or clarification of ambiguous terms. Evidence of the settlor’s intent may include draft documents, written instructions, correspondence, and testimony from witnesses who were present when the trust was signed. When the settlor is still living, their current wishes and capacity may also play a role in determining appropriate modifications consistent with the trust instrument and governing law.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered correction of a trust document to reflect the actual agreement or intent that was mistakenly omitted or misstated. It is typically requested when a drafting error or mutual mistake produced terms that do not match what the settlor intended. A petition for reformation must present clear evidence supporting the correction, such as earlier drafts, contemporaneous communications, or other proof demonstrating the intended provisions. When granted, reformation adjusts the trust language so trustees and beneficiaries can proceed under terms that accurately reflect the settlor’s original plan.
Modification involves changing a trust’s terms to reflect new circumstances, updated tax planning, or altered family dynamics. Unlike reformation, which corrects errors to reflect the original intent, modification may be sought when the settlor’s intent has changed or when the original terms are impracticable. Courts consider statutory authority, the trust document’s amendment provisions, and any potential impacts on third-party or creditor rights. When appropriate, a modification order gives trustees a clear legal basis to administer the trust under revised terms that more closely align with current goals and practical needs.
A Heggstad petition arises when assets expected to be in a trust at the settlor’s death were not properly transferred during life but were intended to be part of the trust plan. The petition asks the court to recognize assets as belonging to the trust despite the transfer omission, typically based on intent and surrounding circumstances. Granting a Heggstad petition allows the trustee to administer those assets according to the trust terms rather than through probate, aligning asset distribution with the settlor’s estate plan when appropriate evidence supports the claim.
When a trust needs change, options range from informal agreement and execution of a valid amendment to seeking court approval through a petition. If the trust contains a valid amendment clause and the settlor has capacity, a simple amendment may suffice. Where multiple parties are involved or the trust lacks amendment authority, obtaining written consents from beneficiaries might resolve issues without court involvement. In cases of dispute, ambiguity, or when creditor rights are implicated, filing a petition provides definitive legal authority. Choosing the appropriate path depends on the trust language, the settlor’s capacity and intent, the nature of the requested change, and the willingness of parties to negotiate.
A limited approach can be appropriate when the trust instrument expressly allows the settlor to amend its terms and the settlor has the required mental capacity to execute the amendment. In such situations, updating distributions, changing successor trustees, or clarifying administrative instructions can often be accomplished without court intervention. This route is typically faster and less costly than a formal petition, and it preserves privacy by avoiding public court filings. It remains important to document the amendment properly and to ensure that all relevant assets are titled consistently with the revised terms to prevent future disputes.
When interested parties reach a voluntary agreement, they may be able to resolve trust issues through written consents or a stipulated amendment without asking the court to intervene. Resolving matters privately can preserve family relationships and reduce legal costs, especially when beneficiaries share common goals and there are no outstanding creditor concerns. Even where beneficiaries agree, it is important to memorialize the resolution in legally effective documents and to update asset titles and related estate planning instruments, such as pour-over wills, so the agreed changes are enforceable and clear to future trustees and administrators.
Comprehensive legal assistance is often required when the trust document contains ambiguous provisions, drafting mistakes, or internal inconsistencies that materially affect administration or beneficiary interests. In such circumstances, the attorney’s role is to assemble a persuasive factual record, prepare a clear legal petition, and coordinate required notices to all interested parties. The court’s resolution provides a binding interpretation or correction that trustees can follow, which reduces the likelihood of future disputes. Proper preparation and documentation are key to securing a favorable court ruling and protecting the estate plan’s overall integrity.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about proposed changes, or when creditor claims could be affected by a modification, formal court involvement may be necessary to ensure a resolution that respects all legal rights. In those situations, a petition provides an impartial forum for resolving disputes, and a judicial order helps prevent future challenges to trust administration. Addressing potential creditor issues and ensuring that notice requirements are satisfied requires careful procedural work and knowledge of statutory deadlines and notice rules, which helps preserve the enforceability of any court-approved modifications.
A comprehensive legal approach addresses both immediate changes and downstream consequences, such as tax implications, asset titling, and interactions with wills and beneficiary designations. By considering the entire estate plan, attorneys can identify and correct related inconsistencies, update ancillary documents like pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, or powers of attorney, and advise on steps to preserve intended distributions. This holistic review reduces the likelihood of future litigation and ensures that modifications integrate smoothly with retirement plan trusts, special needs trusts, and other sensitive provisions that require careful coordination.
Taking a broad view also helps families plan for contingencies such as incapacity, long-term care needs, or changes in beneficiary circumstances. Comprehensive analysis can suggest whether a Heggstad petition, reformation, or full modification is most appropriate, and it enables counsel to develop a practical timeline for court filings, notices, and asset retitling. Clients benefit from clear, legally supported solutions that protect the settlor’s intentions, preserve family relationships where possible, and create a defensible foundation for trustees to administer the trust going forward.
One key benefit of a comprehensive approach is the certainty that a court-ordered modification or reformation provides. When a judge issues an order, trustees and beneficiaries have documented legal authority to act under revised terms, which reduces the risk of subsequent challenges. This finality is especially valuable in families with complex assets, multiple beneficiaries, or blended relationships where disputes are more likely. Clear orders also facilitate interactions with financial institutions and title companies, helping to ensure that asset transfers align with the modified trust and that administration proceeds smoothly.
A comprehensive review helps identify and mitigate unintended consequences that can arise from piecemeal changes, such as inconsistent beneficiary designations or conflicting provisions between a trust and a will. Addressing related documents like revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and retirement plan trusts ensures that changes are harmonized across the estate plan. This proactive coordination protects beneficiaries, reduces administrative friction for trustees, and helps prevent disputes that might otherwise arise when different instruments point to conflicting distribution instructions or trustee responsibilities.
Start by compiling all relevant documents, including the trust instrument and any amendments, wills, beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, and related correspondence. Collecting bank records, titles, and records of asset transfers is also important, as these materials can support a Heggstad petition or show inconsistency between intent and funding. Well-organized records make it easier to present persuasive evidence to the court and to identify the specific provisions that require correction or clarification. Early document gathering reduces delays and helps counsel develop a targeted strategy for the petition.
Evaluate the broader estate plan to ensure that modifications to the trust are consistent with wills, beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, and asset titles. A court-approved modification resolves the trust language, but assets must also be properly titled and beneficiary designations updated to reflect the new plan. Addressing related documents concurrently helps prevent conflicts and reduces the chance that assets will pass outside the intended arrangement. Coordination with financial advisors or title companies may be necessary to complete transfers and to implement the court’s order effectively.
You might consider a trust modification petition if the trust contains drafting mistakes, ambiguous provisions, or outdated terms that do not reflect current family circumstances. Changes in a beneficiary’s needs, such as disability, change in financial status, or a major life event, can make previously suitable distributions impractical or unfair. A petition can also be appropriate if assets intended to be in the trust were not properly transferred and a Heggstad petition is needed to align administration with the original estate plan. Evaluating whether a private amendment, beneficiary consent, or court petition is best requires careful review of the trust language and all surrounding facts.
Another common reason to pursue a petition is when tax law changes or new financial concerns alter the desirability of existing trust terms. A judicial order can facilitate necessary updates while protecting trustee and beneficiary rights. Disputes among family members over interpretation of terms can also make a judicial determination the most effective path to a binding resolution. Ultimately, seeking court approval provides clarity and legal protection for trustees who must carry out distributions in accordance with the settlor’s intent and the court’s directive.
Typical circumstances include drafting errors that misstate beneficiary names or shares, assets that were intended for trust distribution but were not transferred, changed beneficiary needs or incapacity, tax or regulatory changes that affect distributions, and disputes among beneficiaries or trustees about interpretation. When the settlor is deceased or incapacitated and the trust cannot be amended informally, a petition provides a formal path to adjust terms. Whether the goal is reformation to correct mistakes or modification to address new realities, a court filing ensures a clear, enforceable outcome when informal remedies are not available or adequate.
Clerical errors, unintended omissions, or conflicting provisions within a trust can cause serious problems for administration. When a trust’s language does not match the settlor’s intended distribution plan, reformation may be necessary to correct the record. Supporting evidence such as draft versions, communications, or testimony can demonstrate the intended terms. Correcting mistakes through a court order provides trustees with the authority to act in accordance with the corrected language and helps avoid later disputes from beneficiaries who might otherwise rely on the incorrect text.
Sometimes assets intended to be part of the trust were never retitled or transferred, resulting in potential probate exposure and administrative confusion. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize such assets as belonging to the trust based on the settlor’s demonstrated intent. Proving intent typically requires documentary evidence and witness statements. When successful, recognition of these assets allows the trustee to administer them under trust terms, avoiding probate and aligning actual asset distribution with the estate plan.
Changes in family structure, the emergence of a beneficiary’s disability or special needs, or new caregiving requirements can render original trust provisions impractical or inequitable. Modifying the trust or adding provisions such as a special needs trust can better protect a beneficiary’s access to public benefits while preserving inheritance. Courts may approve modifications that reflect the settlor’s intent and protect the beneficiary’s best interests, provided statutory requirements and notice obligations are met. Thoughtful planning in these situations preserves support while respecting legal protections for vulnerable beneficiaries.
Residents of Carmichael and Sacramento County seeking to modify a trust can rely on local counsel familiar with probate court procedures, notice requirements, and the practical issues that arise in trust disputes. Our office assists with initial assessments, drafting petitions, preparing declarations and supporting exhibits, and communicating with trustees and beneficiaries. We also coordinate with financial advisors to address asset titling and tax concerns. By providing thorough preparation and clear guidance through each step, we help clients pursue solutions that honor the settlor’s intent while addressing present-day needs and legal realities.
We focus on helping clients navigate the legal and practical complexities of trust modification petitions, from assembling a factual record to representing interests in court when necessary. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and pragmatic strategies designed to reach enforceable results. We assist with related estate planning updates such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and HIPAA authorizations to ensure that any modification is implemented consistently across all documents and assets.
Clients value a responsive process that anticipates procedural requirements, including serving proper notice, evaluating creditor implications, and preparing proposed orders that the court can adopt. We work to minimize conflict when possible, pursuing negotiated resolutions when appropriate, and advancing a court petition when formal intervention is necessary to protect rights and provide finality. Our goal is to help trustees administer the trust confidently and to preserve family relationships by promoting clear, legally supported outcomes.
We also assist with related estate documents such as retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, special needs trusts, pet trusts, and guardianship nominations, ensuring any trust modifications align with the broader estate plan. Practical coordination with title companies, financial institutions, and tax advisors helps implement court-ordered changes effectively. Throughout the process, we strive to provide clients with practical solutions that reflect current needs while honoring prior intentions and reducing the potential for future disputes.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to understand the trust’s provisions, the desired changes, and the facts supporting a petition. We review all relevant documents, advise on alternative dispute resolution or private amendments when appropriate, and recommend a court petition when necessary to secure binding relief. If a petition is pursued, we prepare the pleadings, coordinate service and notice to interested parties, assemble supporting declarations and exhibits, and present the case to the court on the client’s behalf. We also follow up to implement any court orders, including assisting with asset retitling and related document updates.
The first step involves gathering the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents, and records of asset transfers. We interview the client and relevant witnesses to document intent and collect contemporaneous evidence that supports reformation or modification. This phase also includes identifying all interested parties and potential creditor claims that must be addressed. A careful factual and legal assessment at this stage shapes the petition strategy and identifies whether voluntary resolution or a court petition is the best path forward.
We closely analyze the trust text to identify ambiguities, conflicts, or amendment provisions, and compare the trust to wills, beneficiary designations, and power of attorney documents. This review helps determine if a private amendment is possible or if a petition is needed to correct mistakes or reconcile inconsistencies. Detailed document review also uncovers whether assets have been properly transferred and whether additional filings, such as a Heggstad petition, might be required to bring assets into the trust’s administration.
Gathering supporting evidence is essential to persuading a court to grant modification or reformation. We collect drafts, correspondence, financial records, and witness statements that shed light on the settlor’s intent and the circumstances of any drafting errors or overlooked transfers. Well-crafted declarations and exhibits help the judge understand the factual context and support the requested relief while addressing foreseeable challenges from opposing parties.
Once the factual record is assembled, we draft a detailed petition and supporting declarations tailored to the requested relief, whether reformation, modification, or a Heggstad claim. The petition sets forth the legal basis for relief and the facts that justify the court’s intervention. We also prepare a proposed order and ensure that all procedural requirements for filing, service, and notice to beneficiaries and trustees are met according to Sacramento County rules to create a complete and compliant court submission.
Drafting involves translating factual evidence into a coherent legal argument that demonstrates why the court should approve the requested changes. The proposed order is prepared to reflect the relief sought so the judge has a clear template for the ruling. Clear, persuasive pleadings reduce the likelihood of procedural challenges and help streamline the court’s review, improving the likelihood of a favorable resolution without prolonged litigation.
Proper notice to interested parties and creditors is a procedural requirement and a substantive protection. We ensure that all necessary notice documents are prepared and served in compliance with statutory timelines to protect the process from later challenges. When creditor exposure is possible, we take steps to evaluate and address those claims, which may involve additional filings or negotiated resolutions to avoid jeopardizing the trust’s revised structure.
After filing, the court may set a hearing to consider the petition, or it may rule on the written record when issues are uncontested. We represent clients at hearings, present declarations and evidence, and respond to objections from opposing parties. When the court issues an order granting relief, we assist with implementation tasks such as drafting conforming amendments, updating asset titles, coordinating with financial institutions, and recording any required documents. This final phase ensures the court’s directives are put into practical effect for trust administration.
Representation includes presenting the factual record, arguing legal points, and advocating for a clear and enforceable order. Where negotiation with other parties is possible, we pursue settlements that reduce time and expense while protecting client interests. Effective courtroom and negotiation advocacy focus on achieving outcomes that preserve the settlor’s intentions and provide trustees with definitive instructions for trust administration.
Following a favorable order, practical implementation is critical. This may include preparing conforming amendments for the trust, updating beneficiary designations, retitling assets into trust names, and notifying financial institutions or title companies. We coordinate with outside advisors when necessary to finalize transfers and to ensure tax and administrative steps are completed. Proper implementation avoids administrative pitfalls and helps trustees carry out distributions according to the court-approved plan.
A trust modification petition is a court filing requesting a change, clarification, or reformation of a trust instrument when informal amendment is impossible or inappropriate. It is needed in situations where drafting errors, ambiguities, or untransferred assets prevent the trust from being administered in accordance with the settlor’s intended plan. A petition allows the court to review the facts and issue an order that trustees and beneficiaries can rely on for lawful administration of the trust. When considering a petition, it is important to evaluate alternatives such as private amendments or beneficiary consents. If parties cannot reach agreement or if creditor concerns exist, a petition provides a binding legal resolution that reduces uncertainty and helps avoid future litigation over the trust’s meaning or the disposition of assets.
The duration of a petition varies depending on case complexity, local court schedules, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear supporting evidence and agreed-upon language may be resolved more quickly, sometimes on a short calendar or by submission to the court. Contested matters involving multiple interested parties, evidentiary disputes, or creditor issues can take longer and may require multiple hearings. Local procedures in Sacramento County, including notice periods and filing windows, also influence timing. Early preparation and thorough documentation help streamline the process. Clients should expect timelines to vary and plan for procedural steps such as serving notice, waiting for responses, and appearing at hearings as needed.
Yes, beneficiaries can oppose a trust modification petition and may file objections or appear at hearings to present contrary evidence or arguments. Opposition might be based on disagreement over the proposed changes, concerns about beneficiary rights, or disputing the factual basis for reformation or recognition of assets. When opposition arises, the court weighs competing evidence and legal arguments before issuing a ruling. Because contested proceedings can be time-consuming and costly, parties often attempt negotiation or mediation to narrow issues. Even when opposition is expected, preparing a strong factual record and clear legal reasoning increases the likelihood of obtaining a court order that addresses objections and provides enforceable guidance for trustees.
Evidence supporting a reformation claim typically includes contemporaneous drafts, written instructions, correspondence, or testimony showing the settlor’s actual intent and that a mistake occurred in the executed trust document. Declarations from individuals who observed the trust’s creation or who assisted in drafting can also be persuasive. Demonstrating a clear discrepancy between intent and the final language is central to obtaining reformation. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence and whether the proposed correction accurately reflects what the settlor intended. Solid documentary evidence and consistent witness statements strengthen the petition and help the judge feel confident that the reformed language aligns with the settlor’s original plan.
A trust modification petition can affect creditor claims depending on the nature of the relief and timing of the petition. Courts are attentive to protecting legitimate creditor rights, and notice requirements may include providing creditors with the opportunity to assert claims. If creditor exposure exists, the petitioner must address these risks as part of the petition process, which may include additional procedural steps to resolve or reduce potential liabilities. Proper planning and disclosure minimize surprises and help ensure modifications do not inadvertently prejudice creditor rights. Counsel will evaluate creditor exposure and recommend steps to satisfy notice requirements and to reduce the risk that modifications will be later challenged on creditor-related grounds.
If the trust document expressly allows the living settlor to make amendments and the settlor has the necessary mental capacity, the settlor can typically modify the trust without court involvement by executing a valid amendment or restatement. When the settlor is alive and able to sign, formal amendment is often the simplest route to update trust provisions. It is important to follow the trust’s required formalities for amendments to ensure the changes are legally effective. However, when the settlor is incapacitated, deceased, or when amendment language is absent or ambiguous, a court petition may be necessary. In such cases, a petition provides the legal avenue to adjust or correct the trust’s terms in a binding manner.
A Heggstad petition is used to bring assets into trust administration when the settlor intended those assets to be part of the trust but they were never properly transferred into the trust during life. The petition asks the court to recognize that specific assets should be administered under the trust rather than through probate, typically based on evidence of the settlor’s clear intent. Success requires documenting the intent and showing why the assets were not transferred as intended. This procedure helps ensure that the settlor’s overall estate plan is honored and provides trustees with legal authority to manage and distribute those assets under trust terms. It can be a valuable remedy when oversight or errors in funding the trust would otherwise frustrate the settlor’s plan.
Special needs and pet trusts require careful consideration when modifying trust provisions because of eligibility for public benefits and the unique nature of ongoing care. Modifications should preserve any benefits the beneficiary relies on and ensure that distributions and trustee discretion are structured to supplement, not supplant, public assistance. Courts will consider the best way to maintain protections for vulnerable beneficiaries while honoring the settlor’s intent. For pet trusts, modifications can clarify trustee duties, funding mechanisms, and distribution timing to ensure the animal’s care is consistent with the settlor’s wishes. Any change should be drafted to provide enforceable instructions while accommodating practical realities of ongoing care and funding.
Yes, after a court grants an order modifying or recognizing trust assets, it is usually necessary to retitle assets and update beneficiary designations to reflect the court’s directives. Implementing the court’s order often requires coordinating with financial institutions, title companies, and retirement plan administrators to ensure asset ownership matches the trust’s revised terms. Without proper retitling, assets may remain outside the trust’s administration and subject to unintended probate or conflicting distribution instructions. Implementing the order in a timely manner reduces administrative confusion and ensures trustees can exercise their duties under the modified trust. Assistance with documentation and communication to relevant institutions helps complete this practical phase effectively.
The cost to file a trust modification petition depends on factors such as the complexity of the factual record, the number of interested parties, whether the matter is contested, and local court filing fees. Uncontested matters with clear documentation and cooperative beneficiaries are generally less expensive, while contested petitions requiring multiple hearings, discovery, or extensive declaratory proof will increase legal costs. Early assessment and focused preparation can help control expenses by narrowing disputed issues and streamlining the filing. During an initial consultation, we provide a candid assessment of likely costs based on the circumstances and discuss strategies to manage expense, such as pursuing negotiated resolutions where appropriate or limiting the scope of the petition to the most essential issues.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas