A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool when assets were intended to be in a trust but are still titled in an individual’s name. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works in California, what it involves for families in Fair Oaks, and how our firm approaches these matters on behalf of clients. We outline common scenarios, the legal process, and practical steps to confirm that trust beneficiaries receive assets that were meant to be held by a trust. Our goal is to provide clear, balanced information so you can make informed decisions about next steps for your estate plan.
Many families discover after a loved one’s death that property was never properly transferred into a trust even though the trust document indicated that was the intention. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended them to be part of the trust. This guide covers eligibility, documentation, typical timelines, and outcomes you can expect in Sacramento County. You will also find guidance on how to prepare documents, minimize delays, and protect beneficiary interests while addressing potential creditor and title issues.
Filing a Heggstad petition helps resolve situations where assets were meant to be in a trust but were never retitled before death. The petition can prevent long delays, reduce disputes among heirs, and enable distribution according to the trust terms without requiring full probate for the mis-titled asset. For trustees and beneficiaries, resolving ownership sooner can protect asset value and clarify responsibilities for managing or selling property. The petition process also creates a clear public record that aligns title with the trust terms, helping future transactions and reducing the risk of conflicting claims from creditors or other claimants.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves Fair Oaks and surrounding communities with a focus on estate planning and trust administration matters. We assist clients in evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, gathering supporting evidence, drafting pleadings, and representing trustees or beneficiaries in court when needed. Our approach emphasizes careful documentation, calm negotiation with interested parties, and efficient court filings to resolve title issues. We also coordinate with title companies and county recorder offices to implement court orders so that trust assets are properly titled following a favorable ruling.
A Heggstad petition asks a California court to find that certain property should be treated as trust property despite being titled in a deceased person’s name. This typically arises when a decedent intended to fund a trust but failed to transfer deeds, accounts, or other assets before death. The petition requires evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent, such as trust documents, transfer instructions, beneficiary designations, and communications. It can cover real estate, bank accounts, retirement assets when applicable, and other titled property. Understanding the burden of proof and organizing clear evidence ahead of filing increases the likelihood of favorable resolution.
Not every case needs a Heggstad petition; sometimes corrective transfers, affidavits, or cooperation from title companies can resolve matters without court involvement. When title disputes arise, interested parties disagree, or third parties will not accept trust authority, a Heggstad petition becomes necessary to obtain a binding judicial determination. The petition process involves filing in the appropriate probate court, providing notice to interested parties, and submitting declarations and exhibits that document the trust and the decedent’s intent. Courts will weigh the evidence and may issue orders that allow title to be transferred to the trustee.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that property belongs to a trust based on the decedent’s intent rather than formal title. The court reviews the trust instrument, any transfer documents, and testimony or written statements about what the decedent intended. The goal is to correct the public record so assets pass according to trust terms, not by intestacy or an unrelated title. The petition may also request related relief, such as direction to county recorders or instructions for handling liens, mortgages, or creditor notices. The process aims to align legal title with the decedent’s estate plan and provide certainty for beneficiaries.
Preparing a Heggstad petition generally begins with collecting the trust document, any deeds or account statements, drafts showing intended transfers, and communications that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. The petitioner drafts pleadings, attaches sworn declarations, and provides notice to heirs and creditors as required by law. The court may schedule hearings where evidence is presented and objections are addressed. After a decision, there are administrative steps to update title records, notify financial institutions, and distribute assets per the trust. Proper preparation and a persuasive presentation of intent are central to a successful petition outcome.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate a Heggstad petition. This glossary explains phrases you are likely to encounter, from the petition itself to probate court terminology and recording requirements. Familiarity with these terms makes it easier to organize documents, follow court procedures, and communicate with title companies and financial institutions. Below are clear definitions of frequently used concepts and how they relate to proving that assets should be treated as trust property instead of remaining in a decedent’s individual name.
A Heggstad petition is the legal filing used to ask a California probate court to declare that certain titled assets should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent. The petition includes the trust document, supporting declarations, and evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. The court’s finding enables the trustee to treat and transfer the property consistent with the trust terms and facilitates record changes with county recorders and title companies, reducing uncertainty for beneficiaries and third parties who rely on clear ownership records.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so they are governed by the trust terms. Funding can include retitling real property, changing account ownership, naming a trust as beneficiary, and assigning tangible or intangible assets to the trust. Proper funding is essential to avoid the need for court actions after death. When funding is incomplete at the time of death, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to confirm that the asset should be treated as trust property despite remaining in the decedent’s individual name.
The trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust and outlines its terms, including beneficiaries, trustees, and how assets are to be managed and distributed. The instrument may include schedules of assets, funding instructions, and provisions naming successor trustees. When bringing a Heggstad petition, the trust instrument is central evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent to have particular property governed by the trust, and courts carefully review its language alongside other documentation.
Title transfer is the act of changing legal ownership of real estate, vehicles, bank accounts, or other titled assets into the name of a trust or a trustee. When a transfer is not completed during the decedent’s lifetime, a Heggstad petition can assist in obtaining a court determination that the asset should be treated as having been intended for trust ownership. Once the court issues an order, the process typically includes recording deeds or updating account records to reflect the trustee as the proper owner for administration and distribution.
When assets intended for a trust remain titled in an individual’s name, there are various approaches, including informal corrective actions, negotiated transfers with other heirs, or filing a Heggstad petition. Informal resolution can be quicker if all parties agree and the title or account holder cooperates, but it may lack the binding court determination that a petition provides. A Heggstad petition provides a formal adjudication that aligns title with the trust. Choosing between options depends on the presence of disputes, the willingness of third parties to cooperate, and the degree of clear evidence of the decedent’s intent.
A limited approach may succeed when all beneficiaries and heirs understand and agree on the decedent’s intent, and when title companies or financial institutions accept corrective documentation such as affidavits, missing deed corrections, or beneficiary designations. If the decedent left clear written instructions and there are no competing claims, parties can often resolve funding gaps without court involvement. This path can save time and cost, though it requires willingness from institutions to accept substitutes for formal court orders and may not provide the same finality as a judicial determination.
Some assets present fewer obstacles when correcting title, such as small bank accounts or personal property that does not require county recording. When institutions readily accept documentation and there are no liens, mortgages, or creditor disputes, trustees can often complete transfers through administrative actions. In these situations, working with the account holder or county recorder to update records may be faster and less costly than court proceedings. It is important to confirm that these actions fully protect beneficiary rights and that no later claimant can successfully challenge the transfer.
Filing a Heggstad petition typically becomes necessary when beneficiaries dispute ownership, when interested parties refuse to cooperate, or when title companies demand a court order to change records. In such cases, a formal petition creates a legally enforceable determination of ownership that third parties and county recorders will rely upon. The petition process provides a forum to present evidence, address objections, and obtain a definitive ruling so assets can be administered according to the trust without ongoing uncertainty or future litigation over title.
Complexities such as liens, mortgages, competing beneficiary claims, or potential creditor claims can make informal fixes ineffective or risky. A Heggstad petition allows the court to consider these matters and issue orders addressing competing interests, payment of debts, and how proceeds should be distributed. Courts can also direct recorders and financial institutions on the proper disposition of an asset. In complex circumstances, pursuing a court resolution reduces the risk of having to revisit title disputes later and provides a clear path forward for trustees.
A comprehensive court approach like a Heggstad petition provides finality and a public record that confirms assets belong to the trust. This legal determination protects beneficiaries from subsequent challenges, allows trustees to act with confidence, and simplifies later transactions by having title consistent with the trust. While it involves court filings and potential hearings, the clarity provided can prevent protracted disputes and facilitate proper administration, sale, or distribution of the asset under the trust’s terms, avoiding delays that can diminish asset value or complicate estate settlement.
In addition to legal certainty, a court order can help with obtaining title insurance, addressing liens or mortgages, and satisfying institutional requirements for transferring accounts or recording deeds. The court’s ruling can also direct how creditor claims are handled and provide guidance for trustees on their duties and timelines. For families balancing emotional concerns and legal obligations after a death, a formal resolution reduces ambiguity and provides a structured path to complete the estate administration in accordance with the decedent’s intentions.
A court determination through a Heggstad petition results in an authoritative statement that certain assets are trust property, which makes subsequent transactions more straightforward and defensible. With clear title, trustees can sell or transfer assets, obtain insurance, and distribute proceeds without persistent question about ownership. That clarity reduces the risk of litigation down the road and helps beneficiaries receive what the decedent intended. The public record created by the court order also assists future estate or property planning matters by ensuring title reflects the trust structure.
A favorable court order shields trustees and beneficiaries from some later challenges by creating an enforceable judgment about ownership. This can be especially important if creditors assert claims or if distant relatives raise objections. The court can address competing interests as part of its decision, which reduces uncertainty and helps trustees manage distribution responsibly. While court procedures involve time and cost, the resulting legal clarity often proves worthwhile for preserving estate value and ensuring distributions occur according to the trust’s directions.
Begin compiling all relevant documents as soon as a mis-titled asset is discovered. Collect the original trust document, any deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, handwritten notes, emails, or communications that reflect the decedent’s intention to fund the trust. Also gather mortgage statements, lien information, and any communications with financial institutions. Organized documentation streamlines preparation of a Heggstad petition and makes it easier to demonstrate intent to the court. This early work can reduce delays, support persuasive declarations, and limit the scope of disputes among interested parties.
After obtaining a court order, coordinate with county recorders and title companies to implement the judgment and update public records. Some recorders have specific submission requirements for corrected deeds and orders, and title companies may require additional documentation or endorsements. Address mortgages, liens, and insurance issues proactively to prevent resale or refinancing delays. Ensuring these administrative tasks are completed promptly helps trustees manage trust assets efficiently and reduces the chance of later disputes about ownership or marketability.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset was meant to be in a trust but remains titled in a decedent’s name and when informal remedies are insufficient. This includes situations with uncooperative third parties, conflicting beneficiary positions, or when title companies require a court order to transfer ownership. A petition provides a legally binding determination that aligns title with the trust and can address liens or creditor concerns. For trustees who need to administer or distribute an asset, a clear court directive often avoids further delays and helps protect the interests of beneficiaries.
Filing a petition is also appropriate when preserving asset value and preventing continued uncertainty are priorities. Real estate and accounts that cannot be used, sold, or insured because of improper title can lose value over time. A court resolution allows trustees to act decisively, resolve competing claims, and finalize distribution according to the trust terms. If there is any doubt about whether informal fixes will be respected by third parties, pursuing a judicial determination removes ambiguity and helps close the estate administration process with confidence and clarity.
Typical circumstances include finding deeds or accounts still titled in the decedent’s name after death, conflicts among heirs about intended ownership, unrecorded transfers, or institutional refusals to recognize trust authority without a court order. Other triggers are loans or mortgages that complicate transfer, missing signatures or defective transfer documents, and situations where the decedent’s intent is documented but insufficiently evidenced for institutions to act. In these cases, a Heggstad petition helps obtain the judicial finding needed to correct the record and proceed with trust administration.
A frequent scenario involves real property that was intended to be placed into a revocable living trust but remains titled in the decedent’s individual name. Since deeds require recording and formal transfer, failure to update title can prevent the trustee from managing or selling the property. A Heggstad petition can demonstrate the decedent’s intent and ask the court to find that the property should be treated as trust property. Once the court issues an order, the trustee can record a corrective deed and proceed with administration in accordance with the trust.
Bank and brokerage accounts sometimes remain titled to the decedent despite instructions or documents indicating they were meant for the trust. Financial institutions may refuse to retitle accounts without a court order, especially when beneficiary designations or ownership records are inconsistent. Filing a Heggstad petition clarifies ownership and allows trustees to access, manage, or distribute funds according to the trust, subject to any creditor claims. Careful documentation of account statements, instructions, and correspondence supports the petition and expedites institutional cooperation after a court ruling.
Sometimes the trust document or related schedules reference assets that were never formally assigned or deeded into the trust, leaving gaps in funding. This can happen when property lists are prepared but signatures, acknowledgements, or recording steps are missed. Where documentation shows intent but the formalities are lacking, a Heggstad petition offers a way to correct the situation by presenting evidence of the decedent’s intent and asking the court for an order that treats the assets as trust property, thereby resolving the administrative barrier to distribution.
If you are facing a mis-titled asset in Fair Oaks, our firm helps evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and guides you through the process. We review trust documents, gather supporting evidence, prepare the petition, and coordinate notices and court filings. We also assist with the post-order tasks of recording deeds and updating account records so trustees can manage and distribute assets per the trust. Our focus is on clear communication, practical solutions, and minimizing delays to achieve a resolution that aligns with the decedent’s intent.
Clients rely on our firm to handle sensitive trust funding issues because we provide thorough case preparation and steady guidance through the probate process. We help assemble the factual record needed to support a petition, prepare persuasive declarations, and navigate court procedures efficiently. Our approach emphasizes minimizing conflict through clear communication with beneficiaries, heirs, and institutions while preserving legal rights. We assist trustees in meeting their duties and completing administrative steps after a court order so assets can be managed according to the trust terms.
When documentation is incomplete or third parties resist, having a well-organized petition and supporting evidence is critical. We work directly with clients to identify and gather necessary records, contact title companies and recorders when appropriate, and coordinate creditor notices as required by law. Our goal is to achieve an outcome that restores trust assets to proper status with minimal delay and disruption to the family, always focusing on clear legal routes to a dependable resolution so trustees can proceed confidently.
We also provide guidance on related estate planning matters to help avoid future funding problems, including preparing or reviewing revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, and guardianship nominations. By addressing both the immediate need for a Heggstad petition and the longer-term planning steps, we help families reduce the chances of similar issues arising later. Practical follow-up, such as confirming record updates and advising on title insurance, completes the post-petition process for trustees and beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust, deeds, account records, and any communications that show intent to fund the trust. We identify interested parties, assess potential objections, and outline the evidence needed to support a petition. After preparing pleadings and declarations, we file the petition in the appropriate probate court, serve required notices, and respond to any challenges. Following a court decision, we assist with recording deeds and coordinating with financial institutions so trustees can proceed with administration. Clear steps and consistent communication are central to our approach.
The first step is a detailed evaluation of the trust and all related documentation to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We identify what evidence will be persuasive to the court, including the trust instrument, proposed transfer documents, signed assignments, communications showing intent, and records of title. We also determine the necessary parties who must be noticed and consider any likely creditor or heir objections. This assessment sets the strategy for filing and helps estimate the likely timeline and cost of court proceedings.
We thoroughly review the trust, including schedules and any drafting notes, and examine county title records or account statements to identify discrepancies. The goal is to build a coherent narrative that explains the decedent’s intent and the administrative steps that were missed. Key documents and recorded instruments are assembled as exhibits for the petition. Clear documentation of intent reduces disputes and strengthens the petition by tying the asset directly to the trust provisions and showing why a court order is needed for correction.
Supportive evidence can include declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who were present when the decedent discussed the trust or planned transfers, as well as emails, drafts, or financial adviser notes. These statements provide context about the decedent’s intent and help the court assess the credibility of the claim. Collecting this evidence early allows us to craft targeted declarations and reduces the chance of surprise objections during hearings. Well-prepared supporting materials are essential to persuading the court to grant the petition.
Once the petition and supporting declarations are prepared, we file the matter in the appropriate probate court and serve required notices on all interested parties and known creditors. Proper service is essential to preserve rights and to ensure the court can legally consider the petition. This phase also includes gathering any additional records requested by the court or by respondents. We monitor service deadlines, respond to any procedural issues, and maintain communication with the court clerk to keep the process moving efficiently toward hearing and resolution.
Preparation of court pleadings involves drafting a clear petition, assembling exhibits, and preparing declarations that explain the factual basis for the requested relief. Pleadings must comply with local rules and contain the legal grounds for granting the petition. We include all essential documents as exhibits to enable the court to evaluate the claim without unnecessary delay. Attention to procedural detail at filing reduces the risk of administrative setbacks and helps ensure timely scheduling for hearings and further proceedings.
After filing, timely and correct service on beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors is required. We handle the logistics of service, track proofs of service, and manage responses from interested parties. If objections are filed, we evaluate them and prepare replies or negotiate where appropriate to narrow issues before hearing. Managing notices and responses carefully preserves procedural rights and helps the court address the matter on its merits, rather than on technical or notice-based grounds that can delay resolution.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition and supporting evidence, hears any objections, and determines whether the facts support treating the asset as trust property. If the court grants the petition, we obtain the signed order and then coordinate recording deeds or updating account records to reflect trust ownership. We also address lien resolution, creditor notifications, and title insurance matters. Completing these post-order tasks ensures the court’s decision is effectively implemented so trustees can administer and distribute assets according to the trust.
During the hearing, the judge evaluates the documentary and testimonial evidence submitted with the petition and may consider oral testimony or argument. We prepare witnesses and present declarations that clearly explain the decedent’s intent and the basis for treating the asset as trust property. The court assesses whether the evidence meets the legal standard for a Heggstad determination. A well-organized presentation helps the court reach a decision and can shorten the time required to resolve disputes or address objections raised by other parties.
Once the court signs an order, we coordinate with recorders and financial institutions to implement the decision by recording corrective deeds, updating account registrations, and obtaining necessary endorsements or title updates. We also guide trustees on distribution steps and help resolve remaining administrative matters such as mortgage payoffs, lien releases, or title insurance requirements. Ensuring these tasks are completed promptly helps avoid future disputes and enables trustees to move forward with trust administration in a manner consistent with the court’s ruling.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing asking a probate court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as belonging to a trust, even though title remains in the deceased person’s name. It is commonly used when a decedent clearly intended to fund a trust but failed to complete the formal transfer during life. The petition provides a judicial determination that aligns title with the trust’s terms, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute the asset accordingly. This remedy is important when institutions or other parties refuse to accept informal corrective documentation. Preparing the petition requires assembling the trust document, deeds, statements, and other evidence that demonstrates intent. The court evaluates the submitted evidence, hears any objections, and issues an order if it finds sufficient proof that the decedent intended the asset to be trust property. The order is recorded or used to update account registrations so trustees can proceed. While some matters are resolved without court, a Heggstad petition is the reliable path when title cannot otherwise be corrected or when disputes exist among interested parties. The petition process provides clarity for long-term administration and future transactions involving the asset.
Courts consider the trust instrument, contemporaneous documents, declarations, and statements showing the decedent’s intent when determining whether property should be treated as trust property. Judges weigh written evidence such as the trust itself, drafts, deed preparatory work, and account records, along with sworn declarations from those who witnessed the decedent’s statements or actions. The court looks for a clear link between the decedent’s intent and the specific asset at issue, and will examine whether formal transfer steps were missed versus an absence of intent to fund the trust. In some cases, communications with attorneys, financial advisors, or family members provide persuasive context about intent. The strength of the evidence and the presence of competing claims affect the court’s assessment. Courts also ensure procedural protections, including notice to interested parties, so that objections can be heard. A well-documented petition that ties the asset to the trust with supporting exhibits increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Sometimes simple paperwork or cooperation by title companies and institutions can correct mis-titling without court involvement. Examples include filing corrected deeds, providing affidavits, or updating account registrations if all parties and institutions agree. This informal path can be faster and less expensive, but it relies on the willingness of institutions and the absence of disputes. If any party objects or a title company demands a court order, informal measures may be insufficient to complete the transfer and provide lasting certainty. When institutions or third parties refuse to retitle assets based on informal documentation, or when there are competing claims among heirs, filing a Heggstad petition provides a definitive legal remedy. The petition creates a public record and a court order that title companies and recorders will accept, which helps protect trustees and beneficiaries against future challenges. Choosing between informal correction and a formal petition depends on the specific facts and the level of cooperation available.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the petitioner must serve notice on interested parties, which typically includes named beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, and any known creditors. The probate court requires proper service to ensure that all parties who might be affected have an opportunity to respond or object. The exact list of required recipients depends on the local rules and the assets involved, but the goal is to provide fair notice to those who have legal interests that could be impacted by the court’s decision. Failure to serve required parties correctly can cause delays or procedural setbacks, so careful attention to service rules is important. The petitioner should identify all possible interested parties early, obtain current addresses, and file proofs of service with the court. This procedural diligence protects the validity of the proceeding and helps the court resolve the matter on its merits rather than on technical grounds.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the evidence, the number of interested parties, and the court’s calendar. Straightforward matters with cooperative parties and clear documentation can move more quickly, while contested cases or those requiring substantial additional evidence can take longer. Typical timelines often span several weeks to several months from initial filing through hearing and issuance of an order. Post-order administrative steps such as recording deeds or updating accounts may extend the overall timeline before trustees can complete distributions. Factors that affect timing include the need to locate witnesses, gather records from third parties, respond to objections, and comply with procedural service requirements. Working proactively to assemble complete evidence and communicating with potential respondents can help reduce delays. Courts also require notice periods and scheduling considerations, so early planning provides the best chance for a more predictable timeline.
A Heggstad order clarifies ownership for the purposes of trust administration but does not automatically eliminate legitimate creditor claims. The court may address creditor rights as part of the proceedings or through parallel probate procedures, depending on the circumstances. Trustees remain responsible for identifying and handling valid claims against the decedent’s estate or against the asset, following applicable notice and claims procedures to satisfy lawful obligations before distribution to beneficiaries. Where creditor concerns are present, the petition may include proposals for handling liens, mortgages, or outstanding debts, and the court can issue instructions on how to proceed. Discussing creditor exposure early in the process and providing notice as required by law helps the court and parties resolve claims in a manner consistent with legal obligations and the trust’s terms.
The most persuasive evidence in a Heggstad petition includes the trust document itself, contemporaneous drafts or schedules identifying the asset, deeds or transfer documents that were prepared but not recorded, and written communications that show intent to fund the trust. Declarations from individuals who personally heard the decedent express intent or assisted with transfer steps can also be influential. Clear documentary proof that ties the asset to the trust’s provisions is particularly important. Additional supporting materials such as attorney notes, emails, bank or title company correspondence, and drafts of deeds strengthen the case. Evidence showing steps taken toward transfer but left incomplete demonstrates a present intent to fund the trust, which courts consider when deciding whether to treat the asset as trust property despite formal title remaining in the decedent’s name.
Before a court order is issued, trustees should proceed cautiously. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries and must avoid actions that could be challenged as unauthorized. In many situations, trustees can take limited steps to protect an asset, such as securing property, maintaining insurance, or preventing waste, but they should avoid selling or transferring title without appropriate authorization. If immediate action is required to preserve value, seeking court direction or expedited relief can provide necessary authority while protecting the trustee from later liability. Communicating with beneficiaries and documenting any protective steps taken is important to maintain transparent administration. When urgent decisions are required, filing a petition for temporary orders or seeking court guidance can authorize necessary actions while the Heggstad petition proceeds, ensuring the trustee acts within legal bounds and avoids disputes over unauthorized transfers.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition, the petitioner obtains a signed order that is then used to update title records, record corrective deeds, and retitle accounts or other property into the name of the trust or trustee. This administrative phase often involves working with county recorders and financial institutions to ensure the court’s order is recognized and implemented. Trustees can then administer or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms subject to any conditions set by the court. The court’s order also helps protect trustees and beneficiaries against later ownership disputes by creating an authoritative public record. Following implementation of the order, trustees should confirm that deeds are recorded correctly, account registrations are updated, and any required endorsements or title insurance matters are resolved so that the asset is fully integrated into the trust estate for ongoing administration.
To prevent future trust funding mistakes, review estate planning documents periodically and follow clear funding checklists for real estate, account retitling, beneficiary designations, and assignments to the trust. Recording deeds for real property, updating account registrations, and confirming beneficiary designations with financial institutions reduces the chance that assets remain mis-titled. Regular reviews when life events occur, such as changes in marital status, property acquisitions, or retirement account updates, help maintain alignment between the trust document and asset ownership. Working with legal and financial professionals to document transfers and maintain a clear schedule of trust assets can prevent funding gaps. Providing trustees and family with a copy of the trust and a simple funding inventory also helps ensure that assets are transferred into the trust as intended and reduces the likelihood that a court petition will be needed in the future.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas