A Heggstad petition can be an essential legal tool when trust assets were not properly transferred into a revocable living trust before a grantor passed away. Many families in Folsom face uncertainty about how to place assets into a deceased loved one’s trust and avoid costly probate. This page explains how a Heggstad petition operates in California, what to expect from the process, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman approach these matters with clear communication, practical solutions, and careful handling of trust paperwork and related filings to help preserve a client’s estate plan intent.
When property has not been retitled into a trust or a pour-over will leaves gaps, a Heggstad petition asks the court to treat certain assets as if they were already transferred to the trust. This legal step often arises after a settlor’s death, when family members need a dependable pathway to align probate administration with the settlor’s documented estate plan. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help explain eligibility, gather necessary records, and prepare a petition that shows the trust’s intent and the decedent’s ownership at the time of death, all while aiming to reduce delay and unnecessary conflict.
A Heggstad petition serves to honor a decedent’s estate planning choices by asking the court to recognize that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust despite not being formally retitled. This can prevent assets from entering general probate, preserve privacy, and carry out the distribution plan the deceased laid out. For family members, the petition can save time and expense compared with full probate, protect beneficiaries’ interests, and reduce administrative complexity. Preparing the petition carefully with supporting documentation improves the chance the court will grant the requested recognition.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning and trust administration services with a focus on clear communication and practical solutions for families across California. Our approach emphasizes thorough document review, thoughtful explanation of legal options, and hands-on assistance through each procedural step. For clients facing Heggstad petitions, we gather the necessary trust documents, asset records, and declarations to present a complete and persuasive filing. We work to keep families informed and guided through filing, response periods, and potential hearings, always prioritizing the client’s goals for faithful trust administration and asset distribution.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to treat certain property as if it had been transferred into a revocable trust prior to the grantor’s death. To succeed, the petition typically shows clear evidence that the decedent owned the property and intended it to be part of the trust. Relevant documentation may include trust instruments, deeds, beneficiary designations, bank records, and witness or custodian declarations. This process is particularly useful when administrative or clerical oversights prevented formal retitling, yet the written estate plan and surrounding circumstances indicate the trust was meant to own the asset.
The court assesses the evidence and may grant an order recognizing trust ownership when it is persuaded that the decedent intended the trust to hold the asset. A Heggstad petition does not alter the terms of the trust; it simply clarifies ownership to match the decedent’s plan. The proceeding involves preparing a petition, serving interested parties, and responding to any objections. Timely action, accurate paperwork, and full disclosure of asset history help avoid contested hearings and align estate administration with the decedent’s written intentions and applicable California probate rules.
A Heggstad petition is a probate filing seeking an order that certain assets be deemed part of a trust despite not being formally transferred into it. The petition relies on evidence showing ownership by the decedent and an intent that those assets be administered according to the trust. Often used after death when records are incomplete, it bridges paperwork gaps so that trust distribution proceeds without unnecessary probate. The petition may be accompanied by declarations from those familiar with the decedent’s planning, copies of the trust, and account statements showing prior ownership or intent to fund the trust.
Successful Heggstad petitions generally include a clear statement of facts, evidence of the decedent’s ownership, documentation of the trust’s terms, and declarations from witnesses or custodians. The process begins with document collection and a review of asset titles, followed by drafting the petition and required judicial forms. The petition is filed in the appropriate probate court, and notice is served on interested parties. If no objections arise, the court may issue an order recognizing trust ownership. If objections are raised, additional evidence and potential hearings may be necessary to resolve disputes.
Understanding common terms helps individuals navigate a Heggstad petition. Terms include settlor or grantor, who created the trust; trust property or trust res, the assets intended for the trust; successor trustee, who manages the trust after the settlor’s death; probate court, which reviews petitions; and order, the court’s formal recognition that an asset belongs to the trust. Clear definitions and an early review of these concepts support informed decision-making and smoother communication with counsel and family members during the filing process.
A settlor or grantor is the individual who created the trust and whose assets the trust is intended to hold. The settlor’s written trust document establishes how assets should be managed and distributed, and the settlor’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition. When property was left titled in the settlor’s name rather than moved into the trust before death, a petition seeks to honor the settlor’s plan by proving ownership and intent. Demonstrating the settlor’s consistent planning and declarations strengthens the petition’s case in court.
Trust res refers to the assets that comprise the trust, such as real estate, bank accounts, retirement plan interests, or personal property. For a Heggstad petition, identifying the trust res and showing that specific assets were intended to be part of the trust is essential. Evidence can include deeds, account records, beneficiary designations, or contemporaneous statements reflecting the settlor’s intention. Establishing a clear link between the asset and the trust helps the court determine whether the asset should be administered under the trust’s terms rather than through probate.
A successor trustee is the person or entity designated in the trust to take over management and distribution of trust assets after the settlor’s death or incapacity. In a Heggstad petition, the successor trustee often files the petition to confirm that specific assets belong to the trust so they can be administered according to the trust terms. The court looks for the successor trustee’s authority under the trust document and may require evidence the trustee is acting within the settlor’s intended plan when requesting the court’s recognition of property as trust res.
A probate court order is the judge’s written decision granting or denying the relief sought in a Heggstad petition. When the court issues an order recognizing assets as part of the trust, those assets can be administered under the trust’s terms without further probate. The order typically explains the factual findings and the legal basis for the court’s decision. Obtaining a clear, well-documented order helps successor trustees, banks, and other institutions accept the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute the formerly untitled assets.
Families facing untitled assets can consider multiple legal paths, including a Heggstad petition, full probate, or informal estate resolution where possible. A Heggstad petition aims to keep assets in the trust and avoid the time and publicity of probate, while probate formally administers a decedent’s estate when assets are not governed by a trust. Choosing between options depends on the asset types, whether beneficiaries dispute ownership, and the strength of available documentation. Deciding early and selecting the most appropriate approach can conserve estate resources and reduce delay in asset distribution.
When the decedent left clear documentation showing trust intent and the asset titles or beneficiary forms support that intent, a limited filing like a Heggstad petition or an informal trustee action may resolve matters without full probate. Evidence such as a trust instrument, deeds, bank statements, and beneficiary designations that align with the trust reduces uncertainty. If no interested party objects and institutions are willing to accept the trustee’s authority with court recognition, a streamlined process may be efficient and less disruptive for the family while still achieving the decedent’s plan.
A limited approach is more practical when beneficiaries and other interested parties accept the trustee’s representation of the decedent’s intent. If heirs are cooperative and there is no credible opposition, a Heggstad petition or administrative settlement can be straightforward. The absence of disputes helps speed court action and lowers legal costs. Counsel can often negotiate resolutions and present supporting documents that satisfy the court and third parties, making a full probate unnecessary and allowing trust administration to proceed under the decedent’s intended distribution plan.
When asset records are inconsistent, titles are complex, or multiple parties claim interests, a more comprehensive legal approach may be necessary. These complications can require detailed investigation, supplemental filings, and possibly contested hearings to resolve competing claims. Bringing a robust filing that addresses each disputed item and presents persuasive legal and factual support helps the court reach a clear decision. In such scenarios, thorough preparation reduces the risk of future challenges and helps ensure assets are administered according to the decedent’s lawful intentions.
If interested parties raise legitimate objections, or if there are competing beneficiary claims, a comprehensive legal response is often required. Addressing contested matters may involve discovery, depositions, affidavits, and court hearings to evaluate competing evidence and credibility. A well-prepared case documents the trust terms, ownership history, and any communications demonstrating intent. Managing contested proceedings carefully protects the trustee and beneficiaries and helps the court determine the correct outcome consistent with the law and the decedent’s stated wishes.
A comprehensive approach to resolving untitled trust assets can reduce future litigation risk by fully documenting the basis for trust ownership and addressing potential challenges proactively. This process includes assembling robust records, obtaining supporting declarations, and preparing well-reasoned legal arguments so the court can resolve ownership issues decisively. The result is often greater certainty for trustees and beneficiaries, smoother asset transfers, and clearer acceptance by banks, title companies, and other institutions that need formal court orders or complete documentation to release property or funds.
Thorough preparation also helps preserve the settlor’s intent and ensures that distributions follow the plan the settlor created. For families, the benefits include reduced emotional strain, fewer surprises during administration, and a clearer timeline for distribution of assets. A comprehensive process often leads to a binding court order that third parties recognize, minimizing later disputes and aiding trustees in carrying out their fiduciary duties with confidence and transparency, ultimately supporting an orderly closure of the estate.
By addressing potential objections and gathering complete documentation at the outset, a comprehensive approach reduces the likelihood of extended litigation that can deplete estate resources and delay distributions. Courts favor clarity and supporting evidence, so presenting a well-supported petition increases the chances of obtaining an effective order. This approach can shorten the overall administration timeline and minimize costs for beneficiaries by avoiding repeated disputes and multiple court appearances, resulting in a more predictable and streamlined outcome for the trust estate.
A carefully prepared court order and comprehensive documentation help financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties accept the trustee’s authority and release assets to the trust for administration. Institutions often require clear evidence of ownership and a judicial order when titles were never changed, and a thorough filing anticipates these requirements. Having the right paperwork in place reduces administrative friction, prevents delays in accessing funds or transferring property, and ensures that the trustee can act confidently in distributing assets according to the trust’s provisions.
Begin by collecting all trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any written communications reflecting the decedent’s intent. Bank and brokerage records that show ownership or transfer attempts, copies of the trust and amendments, and records of prior transfers help build a clear timeline. Witness declarations from those familiar with the decedent’s planning can further support the petition. Early and thorough documentation streamlines the filing process and reduces opportunities for objection, enabling a smoother court review and faster resolution for beneficiaries.
Different banks, title companies, and government agencies have specific documentation requirements to transfer assets or accept a trustee’s authority. Anticipate these requirements by obtaining certified copies of the trust, the court order recognizing trust ownership, and any needed affidavits. Preparing a file that includes clear proof of ownership and the court’s authorization reduces back-and-forth and avoids delays in asset turnover. Being prepared for institutional requests speeds acceptance of the trustee’s authority and helps finalize distributions promptly.
Filing a Heggstad petition should be considered when assets intended for a revocable living trust were not formally retitled, potentially subjecting them to probate instead of trust administration. The petition provides a path to align asset ownership with the settlor’s written plan and can help avoid the delay, expense, and public nature of probate. Families often pursue this remedy to honor the decedent’s wishes, expedite distribution to beneficiaries, and reduce administrative burden by keeping assets with the trust’s successor trustee rather than through court-supervised probate.
Another common reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is when financial institutions or title companies require a court order to recognize trustee authority over an asset that lacks trust titling. The petition clarifies ownership so the trustee can access funds, transfer property, or carry out other trustee duties. For clients who want a legally recognized status for trust assets, a Heggstad petition provides documented court approval that third parties are more likely to accept, helping finalize the trust administration and reduce the chance of later disputes.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include recently created trusts where the settlor did not retitle real property, bank accounts, or investment accounts; failure to change deed names before death; or oversight in updating beneficiary designations. Other situations include transfers intended but never completed, or where documentation shows intent but institutional requirements remain unmet. When heirs need clear court recognition for trustee authority, a Heggstad petition can address those oversights and align administration with the settlor’s plan.
When real estate intended for a trust remains titled in the decedent’s individual name, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the property as trust res. This scenario often arises due to missed recording steps or administrative delay. Documentation such as the deed, trust instrument, or communications indicating intent to include the property can support the petition. A court order recognizing the property as part of the trust facilitates transfer to the trustee and ensures the trust’s distribution instructions are followed without the need for a separate probate estate to be opened for the property.
Bank and investment accounts that were intended to be moved into a trust but remained in the decedent’s personal name are frequent causes of Heggstad petitions. Statements, transfer requests, or account setup forms may show the settlor intended the trust to own or control the accounts. Filing a Heggstad petition and securing a court order can persuade institutions to permit the trustee to access and manage those funds under the trust terms, avoiding the need for probate administration and enabling a smoother distribution to beneficiaries as the settlor intended.
Occasionally, transfers intended to fund a trust are begun but not completed, or title changes are overlooked during life changes. When paperwork is incomplete or unsigned, a Heggstad petition helps present the surrounding evidence that demonstrates the settlor’s intent. By compiling relevant records and witness declarations showing the decedent’s planning actions, the successor trustee can ask the court to treat the assets as if they had been properly transferred, aligning formal ownership with the decedent’s documented estate plan and preventing unnecessary probate proceedings.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman are available to assist families in Folsom and nearby communities with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration issues. We help identify which assets may require court recognition, gather supporting documentation, prepare the necessary petitions and declarations, and coordinate service on interested parties. Our goal is to provide practical guidance, clear timelines, and consistent communication so trustees and beneficiaries understand each step and can move forward with confidence toward concluding the trust administration in accordance with the settlor’s instructions.
Selecting counsel to handle a Heggstad petition means choosing someone familiar with California probate procedures, trust documentation, and the types of evidence courts find persuasive. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focus on careful preparation of petitions and supporting records, clear client communication, and pragmatic courtroom representation when necessary. We guide trustees through the paperwork and filing process and coordinate with financial and title institutions to achieve recognized trust ownership so distributions can proceed according to the trust terms.
Our approach emphasizes minimizing disruption to families while ensuring a legally sound outcome. We prioritize collecting thorough documentation, drafting persuasive legal arguments, and managing notices and service to interested parties. When objections occur, we present clear factual records and legal analysis to address concerns. The objective is to secure a judicial order that third parties will accept, allowing the trustee to administer the trust without prolonged delays or repeated disputes that can increase costs for beneficiaries and complicate estate closing.
Clients receive support through each step, from an initial review and document gathering to filing the petition and handling communications with heirs and institutions. We explain the likely timeline, necessary evidence, and potential outcomes, so clients can make informed decisions about pursuing a Heggstad petition versus alternative routes. Our goal is to help families carry out the settlor’s wishes efficiently and respectfully while protecting the legal rights of trustees and beneficiaries during the administration process.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust instrument, asset records, and any communications or documents showing the settlor’s intent. We identify assets that may require court recognition and draft a petition that explains the facts and legal basis for the requested order. We prepare supporting declarations, assemble documentary exhibits, handle filing and service requirements, and work with institutions to accept the court order. If objections arise, we manage responses and represent the trustee in any hearings to obtain an enforceable outcome that aligns with the trust terms.
The first step involves collecting and reviewing the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intentions. We assess whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate based on the strength of the available evidence, the types of assets involved, and the interests of potential beneficiaries. This early assessment informs strategy, the likely scope of supporting declarations, and whether alternative procedures may suffice. A careful initial review sets the stage for a focused petition that addresses the court’s evidentiary expectations.
Gathering complete records includes obtaining certified copies of the trust and any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence. Verifying historical ownership and documenting any transfer attempts or intent statements creates a factual record the court can evaluate. We may also seek witness statements or affidavits from individuals who can attest to the settlor’s plan. A well-documented ownership history helps the petition show that the asset was intended to be part of the trust and supports a favorable court decision.
Early identification of potential interested parties and likely objections helps tailor the petition to address concerns and reduce surprises. We analyze beneficiary lists, potential creditors, and heirs who might contest the petition. Preparing for possible objections allows us to include thorough supporting evidence and legal argumentation in the initial filing, increasing the likelihood of a clear ruling. Transparent communication with interested parties when appropriate can also lead to informal resolutions that simplify the formal court process.
In this step we draft the formal Heggstad petition and assemble exhibits, such as the trust instrument, deeds, account records, and supporting declarations. We complete the required court forms and prepare notices for interested parties. After filing the petition in the appropriate probate court, we serve copies on beneficiaries and other entitled parties, providing them the opportunity to respond. Proper drafting, thorough exhibits, and correct service procedures increase the petition’s effectiveness and reduce the chance that procedural issues will delay court consideration.
Supporting declarations explain the facts surrounding ownership and the settlor’s intent, often including testimony from the successor trustee and other witnesses. Exhibits such as deeds, account statements, letters, and prior trust correspondence corroborate the narrative. These elements together give the court a factual basis to evaluate the petition. Ensuring that exhibits are organized and clearly referenced in the petition makes review easier for the court and helps institutions accept the resulting order after it is issued.
Filing the petition requires compliance with local probate court rules regarding forms, filing fees, and timing. Serving all interested parties according to statutory requirements is critical to providing due process and preventing later procedural challenges. We manage service of process, prepare proof of service documentation, and monitor response periods. When parties do not object within the allotted time, the court may act on the petition more quickly; if objections are filed, we are prepared to respond and pursue resolution through evidence and legal argument.
After filing and service, the court will consider any responses and may schedule a hearing if objections exist. If the petition proceeds uncontested, the court can issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property. We assist in obtaining the court order and provide certified copies as needed for banks, title companies, and other institutions. Once institutions accept the order and release assets to the trustee, the trustee can proceed with administration and distribution in accordance with the trust document, completing the process of aligning ownership with the settlor’s plan.
When objections arise, we respond with additional declarations, documentary evidence, and legal briefing to address contested points. Hearings give the court an opportunity to evaluate witness credibility and the sufficiency of evidence. We prepare witnesses and exhibits to present a coherent factual picture that demonstrates the settlor’s intent. Resolving objections at hearing may require negotiation or judicial rulings, and we aim to achieve an outcome that permits the trustee to administer assets under the trust terms while minimizing further litigation.
After obtaining a favorable court order, the trustee may need to present certified copies to banks, title companies, or government agencies to effect transfers and access funds. We prepare the documents institutions typically require and, when necessary, communicate directly with third parties to explain the court order and its implications for asset transfer. Ensuring institutions accept the order and complete their internal steps allows the trustee to move forward with administration and distribution under the trust without further procedural obstacles.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in probate court asking the court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as though they were transferred into a revocable living trust before the settlor’s death. It is typically used when assets remain titled in the decedent’s name despite evidence the decedent intended those assets to be governed by the trust. The petition compiles proof of ownership and clear indications of intent so the court can align asset ownership with the trust’s terms, allowing the trustee to administer and distribute property without opening a separate probate estate. The petition is most appropriate when the available documentation and witness statements provide a persuasive narrative that the settlor planned for the trust to hold the assets. It is an alternative to formal probate for those specific assets and is intended to preserve the settlor’s estate plan. Properly preparing the petition and its supporting evidence helps the court understand the decedent’s intent and the factual ownership history, increasing the chance of a favorable order recognizing the assets as trust property.
Timing varies depending on local court schedules, notice periods, and whether objections are filed. If the petition proceeds uncontested and all paperwork is in order, the court may rule within a few months after filing. The process includes time for document preparation, filing, and serving interested parties, along with the court’s review period. Each local probate court has its own timelines for hearings and orders, so actual timing depends on that jurisdiction’s docket and procedural requirements. When objections are raised, the matter can take significantly longer to resolve because additional evidence, briefing, and hearings may be required. Preparing for potential disputes and submitting thorough supporting documentation can reduce the likelihood of extended delay. Clients should plan for variability in timing and consult with counsel about expected timeframes in their specific county and circumstances so they have realistic expectations during the process.
Supporting a Heggstad petition generally requires copies of the trust document and any amendments, deeds or title documents for real property, account statements for bank or investment accounts, and any beneficiary designation forms. Written communications or records that indicate the settlor intended for the assets to be part of the trust are also important. These documents create the factual backbone of the petition by showing ownership and intent at relevant times. In addition to documentary evidence, declarations or affidavits from the successor trustee and witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s planning and actions are often helpful. These declarations explain the circumstances around asset ownership and any attempts to retitle property. Thorough and well-organized exhibits and witness statements increase the petition’s persuasiveness and help the court make a clear finding about trust ownership.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition by filing objections within the time allowed by notice rules. Objections may argue that the evidence is insufficient, that the asset was not intended for the trust, or that other parties have competing rights. When objections are filed, the court may schedule a hearing where both sides present evidence, and the judge determines whether the petition meets the legal standard for recognition of trust ownership. When a contest arises, having thorough documentation and credible witness declarations becomes more important. The court evaluates the totality of evidence to determine the settlor’s intent and actual ownership. Resolving objections often requires careful legal argumentation and factual presentation to demonstrate why the asset should be treated as trust property, and settlement negotiations may also be an option to resolve disputes without protracted litigation.
A Heggstad petition can prevent specific assets from entering full probate by asking the court to recognize those assets as part of the trust, but it does not automatically avoid all probate procedures for unrelated assets. If only certain items were left untitled and the petition succeeds, those items can be administered under the trust. Other assets not covered by the trust or lacking persuasive documentation may still require probate administration if they cannot be resolved through alternative means. The petition is a targeted remedy intended to align asset ownership with the trust where evidence supports that outcome. It should be viewed as a tool to reduce probate for particular assets rather than a blanket substitute for all probate matters. A comprehensive estate review helps identify which assets can be addressed through a petition and which might need other probate processes, allowing trustees and families to pursue the most efficient route for each item.
Costs vary based on the complexity of the case, the amount of document gathering and research required, court filing fees, and whether objections lead to contested hearings. Simple, uncontested petitions that rely on clear documentation and minimal court time will cost less than matters needing extensive discovery or hearing preparation. Institutions and title work may also create additional expenses for certified copies or title reports. Discussing anticipated costs early helps families budget for the process and make informed choices about proceeding. When objections arise or the factual record is incomplete, costs increase because additional evidence, witness preparation, and court appearances may be necessary. Counsel can often outline likely cost ranges for different scenarios and suggest steps to contain expenses, such as negotiating with interested parties or prioritizing assets where a petition is most likely to succeed. Transparent cost estimates and careful planning help trustees manage resources while pursuing a sound legal outcome.
If a court denies a Heggstad petition, the assets in question may remain under the decedent’s individual title and could require probate to administer. A denial typically reflects the court’s conclusion that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate the settlor’s intent or ownership by the trust. In that event, the trustee and beneficiaries must consider alternative routes, such as opening a probate estate for the assets or pursuing additional factual development to address evidentiary gaps if further action is justified. After a denial, parties can evaluate options that include seeking reconsideration if new evidence is available, negotiating with other interested parties to reach an agreement, or proceeding with probate administration if necessary. Each path has different timelines and costs, so assessing the strengths of potential new evidence or the practical impact of probate will guide the next steps and help trustees decide whether further litigation is appropriate.
Banks and title companies often require clear proof of ownership or a court order before accepting a trustee’s authority, and acceptance is not automatic. A certified court order recognizing assets as trust property generally carries significant weight and is frequently enough for institutions to release funds or transfer titles. However, institutions have their own internal policies, and some may ask for additional documentation or internal reviews before completing transfers based on the order. Preparing a complete package that includes the court order, certified trust copies, and any requested account or title records reduces friction with third parties. When an institution resists, counsel can communicate directly with the institution to clarify the legal effect of the order and provide supporting documentation. That direct engagement often facilitates compliance and helps trustees obtain access to assets required for trust administration and distribution.
A Heggstad petition is not the same as transferring title during life; it is a postmortem court procedure that seeks to treat an asset as though it had been transferred into the trust before death. Transferring title during life avoids the need for court involvement, whereas a Heggstad petition addresses situations where transfers were not completed before the settlor’s passing. The petition relies on evidence of intent to show the court that the trust should govern the asset’s post-death administration, effectively correcting an oversight or documenting intent after the fact. Because the petition is a judicial remedy, it requires legal filings and court review, which takes time and may involve notice and potential objections. In contrast, completing transfers while the settlor is alive typically allows institutions to update records directly without court orders. Therefore, whenever possible, funding trusts during life simplifies administration; when that is not feasible, a Heggstad petition provides a legal path to align asset ownership with the settlor’s documented plan.
To start the process in Folsom, gather the trust document, deeds, bank and investment account statements, and any records that show the settlor’s intent to include assets in the trust. Compile contact information for beneficiaries and any other interested parties. An initial consultation can help identify which assets may require a petition and determine the likely evidence needed. Early preparation and organization of documents make the filing process more efficient and reduce the need for follow-up requests for missing records. Once documents are collected, counsel can assess the strength of the evidence and recommend whether to proceed with a Heggstad petition or pursue alternative steps. Filing requires preparing the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits, then serving interested parties according to court rules. Working with counsel familiar with local probate procedures helps ensure proper filing, service, and handling of potential objections, guiding trustees toward a court order or other resolution consistent with the settlor’s intentions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas