A Heggstad Petition can resolve disputes that arise when trust assets were transferred to a beneficiary but the formal trust paperwork was not properly updated. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help Galt residents understand when a Heggstad Petition may be necessary and what outcomes it can achieve. This introductory overview explains how these petitions address title and probate issues, facilitate clear distribution of assets, and protect beneficiaries’ interests when transfers occurred informally or through incomplete trust administration. The goal is to provide clarity on process and likely timelines so you can make informed decisions for your family’s future.
Many families first learn about Heggstad Petitions when attempting to transfer real property or valuable assets after a trustmaker’s death. These petitions ask a court to recognize that property already transferred to a beneficiary should be treated as trust property or was intended to pass under the trust despite missing documentation. Understanding this path early can prevent prolonged court disputes and ensure assets follow the trustmaker’s plan. This section frames common scenarios, identifies parties who may benefit from filing, and highlights how careful case preparation often produces a smoother resolution that respects the trustmaker’s documented wishes and practical realities of asset transfer.
A Heggstad Petition matters because it can clarify legal title and prevent a small paperwork gap from undermining a trustmaker’s intentions. Filing a petition can confirm ownership when property was conveyed to an individual but was intended to be trust property, avoiding the need for full probate proceedings. This approach can save time and costs compared with contested probate, reduce uncertainty for heirs and beneficiaries, and allow for the distribution and management of assets in alignment with the trust. In addition, a successful petition helps preserve the continuity of estate administration and protects property transactions that took place in good faith.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across Northern California, offering guidance on trust administration, probate alternatives, and Heggstad Petitions. We focus on clear communication and practical strategies to resolve title and trust disputes efficiently. Our approach emphasizes thorough document review, development of a reasoned legal argument supported by relevant facts, and negotiation where possible to reduce litigation. Clients in Galt and surrounding communities rely on our calm, methodical assistance when addressing transfers that may not perfectly match the trust paperwork but where the trustmaker’s intent is clear from circumstances and supporting evidence.
A Heggstad Petition asks the court to recognize that property which appears to be held by an individual should be treated as having been transferred to or held in trust according to the trustmaker’s intent. This remedy commonly arises when deeds or titles were not updated, when transfers occurred informally, or when an asset was placed in a beneficiary’s name with the understanding it belonged to the trust. The petition requires evidence demonstrating the trustmaker’s intention, the circumstances of transfer, and any documentation or testimony that supports treating the property as trust property rather than individual property, allowing the trust plan to be carried out.
Preparing a Heggstad Petition typically involves gathering deeds, trust instruments, bank records, correspondence, and witness statements that collectively show the trustmaker intended the property to be governed by the trust. The petition is filed in the probate court of the county where the property is located and is served on interested parties. The court reviews the evidence and may hold a hearing to determine whether the property should be treated as trust property. Success depends on presenting a coherent narrative supported by credible evidence that aligns with applicable California probate and trust law.
A Heggstad Petition is a legal request filed in probate court to have property recognized as belonging to a trust despite an apparent defect in title or formal transfer documentation. Named for a leading California case, this petition addresses situations where a beneficiary already holds or controls property but formal recognition that the property is subject to a trust is missing. The petition seeks judicial confirmation that the transfer or possession was intended to effectuate the trustmaker’s plan, allowing trustees and beneficiaries to administer or distribute assets consistent with that plan without resorting to a full probate.
Successful petitions generally rely on documentary evidence, witness declarations, and a clear presentation of the trustmaker’s intent. Essential steps include identifying the property, collecting relevant transfers and communications, preparing declarations from parties or witnesses familiar with the transfer, and drafting a petition that explains why court recognition is appropriate. The filing initiates notice to interested persons, and the court may schedule a hearing. Throughout, attorneys work to reconcile property records with trust documents, remedy defects, and seek the most efficient path to confirm trust ownership while minimizing delay and expense for the estate.
Understanding common terms used in trust and Heggstad petition matters helps clients follow the process and anticipate what evidence courts will consider. Terms include trustmaker, trustee, beneficiary, deed, title, probate court, petition, and notice to interested parties. Each of these concepts plays a role in whether a petition succeeds: the trustmaker’s documented intent, the trustee’s authority, how a beneficiary acquired property, and whether proper notice was given to other heirs. Familiarity with these terms empowers clients to gather the right records and explain circumstances that support judicial recognition of trust ownership.
The trustmaker, often referred to as the settlor, is the person who established the trust and set its terms, specifying how assets should be managed and distributed. In a Heggstad Petition context, the trustmaker’s intentions are central: courts examine whether the trustmaker intended for particular assets to be governed by the trust, even if formal title documents were not updated. Evidence of intent may include the trust instrument itself, bank records, deeds, and statements from witnesses or family members. Clarifying the trustmaker’s intent helps courts apply the trust plan accurately and honor the wishes expressed during the trustmaker’s lifetime.
A petition to determine trust ownership is a legal filing asking the probate court to recognize that certain property belongs to a trust despite appearing in another name. This petition is intended to prevent unnecessary probate by confirming that assets should be administered under trust law. The petition sets out the factual basis for treating property as trust property and requests the court’s declaration so trustees and beneficiaries can proceed with administration or distribution. The petition typically includes supporting documents and declarations to show why the court should treat the property as part of the trust estate.
A deed is the legal instrument conveying real property, and title refers to legal ownership. In Heggstad matters, deeds or titles may not reflect the trustmaker’s intent because transfers were mistakenly made to an individual or administrative errors occurred. Courts examine deeds, escrow records, and other ownership documents to determine whether the transfer was meant to place property in trust. Demonstrating that a deed was intended to reflect trust ownership, even if the formal recording was inconsistent, can be decisive in obtaining a court declaration that aligns legal title with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
Notice informs those who may be affected by a Heggstad Petition that a court proceeding is underway, allowing them to participate or object. Interested parties include beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, and anyone with a potential claim on the property. Proper notice is important because it preserves due process and reduces the risk of future challenges. The petition must identify who should receive notice and demonstrate that these parties were informed according to court rules. Addressing notice requirements carefully helps achieve a final court determination that is binding and less likely to be overturned.
When property title does not match trust documents, there are multiple paths: a Heggstad Petition, traditional probate, or negotiated private settlement among heirs. A Heggstad Petition offers a focused, court-supervised remedy to align title with the trust without opening full probate, which can be lengthier and more public. Negotiation can work if all parties agree, but where disagreements or unclear records exist, a petition allows formal judicial resolution. Assessing these options involves weighing cost, speed, privacy, and likelihood of acceptance by the court based on available evidence of the trustmaker’s intent.
If documents such as a trust instrument, deeds, escrow communications, or bank records clearly show that the trustmaker intended the asset to be governed by the trust, a limited Heggstad Petition can often achieve the necessary court declaration without broader probate involvement. In these cases, focused evidence reduces the need for extensive discovery or contested litigation. The court can evaluate the documentary record and issue an order confirming trust ownership, enabling trustees and beneficiaries to proceed with administration and distribution in a streamlined manner that respects the trustmaker’s documented preferences.
When all interested parties acknowledge the trustmaker’s intent and agree to recognition of trust ownership, a simple, uncontested petition can resolve the issue quickly. Cooperative resolution reduces court time and legal expenses and allows the property to be managed or transferred under the trust with minimal delay. The petition still provides formal judicial confirmation, which protects against future disputes, but the collaborative approach often leads to a straightforward filing supported by declarations and stipulations from the parties involved.
A comprehensive approach becomes necessary when ownership is disputed or the evidence about the trustmaker’s intentions is contradictory. In such situations, thorough investigation, factual development, and possibly litigation are required to persuade the court. Counsel may need to conduct depositions, obtain expert testimony on transactional practices, or review extensive records to build a persuasive case. A more robust strategy helps address objections, clarifies legal arguments under California law, and prepares the matter for contested hearings when informal resolution is not possible.
When assets span multiple counties or include complex instruments like retirement accounts, business interests, or mixed-title real estate, a detailed legal plan is often required to coordinate filings and protect beneficiaries’ rights. Multiple jurisdictions can trigger different recording or probate rules. In these cases, counsel must map asset ownership, coordinate with other courts or trustees, and ensure petitions are filed in the correct venues. A comprehensive strategy minimizes the risk of incomplete relief and helps ensure that all affected property is treated consistently according to the trustmaker’s intent.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad Petitions reduces the risk of future challenges by building a strong, well-documented record for the court. This process includes collecting all relevant documents, identifying and interviewing witnesses, and addressing potential objections before they arise. By presenting a coherent narrative that explains transfers and corroborates intent, a comprehensive filing increases the likelihood of a definitive court order that settles ownership issues and allows trustees and beneficiaries to proceed with confidence in administering the trust.
Comprehensive preparation also supports efficient resolution by identifying procedural issues up front, such as which parties require notice or whether any additional filings are needed to correct title records. Addressing these matters early streamlines court proceedings and reduces the chance of remand or further litigation. The resulting clarity benefits families by preserving estate value, reducing avoidable expense, and ensuring that property is managed according to the trustmaker’s direction rather than default probate rules or ambiguous title records.
By thoroughly documenting transfers and presenting a complete evidentiary record, a well-prepared petition increases the likelihood of a binding judicial determination that reduces the chance of future disputes. This finality offers practical protection for trustees and beneficiaries who need to sell, refinance, or otherwise manage property confidently. When courts issue clear orders recognizing trust ownership, third parties and title companies are more comfortable acting on those orders, which facilitates smoother asset transactions and administration consistent with the trustmaker’s expressed intentions.
Addressing potential objections and evidentiary gaps at the outset lowers the risk of protracted litigation that can erode estate value and family relationships. A comprehensive petition can resolve ambiguities that might otherwise lead to contested probate claims or competing title actions. By investing time in thorough preparation and legal analysis, families often avoid the significant emotional and financial costs associated with drawn-out court battles and can move forward with administration tasks such as transfers, sales, and distributions more quickly and with greater certainty.
Begin by assembling deeds, trust documents, escrow statements, and any communications that reference the transfer of the property in question. Early collection of records often reveals patterns and proof of the trustmaker’s intent, and it reduces last-minute delays. Documentation from financial institutions, title companies, or escrow agents can be especially helpful. Having a clear set of files prepared before filing a petition saves time, allows for more accurate pleadings, and strengthens the factual presentation to the probate court, improving the chances of a favorable and timely resolution.
Open and early communication with beneficiaries, heirs, and trustees can reduce conflict and sometimes lead to a stipulation or uncontested filing. Informing interested parties about intentions and evidence helps set realistic expectations and can encourage cooperative solutions. When parties understand the factual basis for a petition, they may agree to a court declaration without contesting the matter. Clear communication also helps identify additional records or witnesses that strengthen the petition and ensures that notice requirements are satisfied before filing with the court.
You should consider this service if property intended to be held by a trust is recorded in an individual’s name, when deeds or titles are incomplete, or when assets were handed over informally but the trust instrument contemplates a different distribution. Filing a petition establishes a formal court record that the property should be treated according to the trustmaker’s plan. This route can prevent the need for full probate, provide legal clarity for trustees and beneficiaries, and enable asset transfers, sales, or refinances to proceed with clear authority backed by a judicial order.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad Petition is to protect transactions that already occurred in good faith but lack formal recognition. Lenders, title companies, and other third parties often require a court order to accept trust ownership when records are inconsistent. A petition resolves ambiguity, reduces the potential for future litigation, and helps heirs and beneficiaries move forward with trust administration. When timely filed and supported by adequate evidence, a petition can be a practical and efficient remedy to align property records with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
Typical circumstances include deeds recorded in a beneficiary’s name after a trustmaker’s death, real property transferred informally without a deed change, or assets titled in a person’s name due to oversight during estate planning. Other scenarios arise when a trustmaker moved assets into a beneficiary’s possession but expected those assets to remain subject to the trust. Each situation requires careful review of the facts and records to determine whether the court should recognize that the property was intended to be part of the trust despite title defects.
A common circumstance is when a deed was prepared or recorded in the name of an individual rather than the trustee, often due to misunderstanding or clerical error. Even if the beneficiary accepted the transfer intending it to be governed by the trust, the recorded deed may create ambiguity. A Heggstad Petition seeks a court declaration that the recorded title should be treated as trust property because the trustmaker intended the asset to remain within the trust’s framework. This approach clarifies legal ownership without resorting to full probate.
Sometimes property was delivered or transferred informally to a beneficiary under the understanding it would be managed or distributed according to the trust. Without formal title changes or written documentation, the transfer might appear as a gift or individual ownership. A petition can present evidence that the transfer was intended to effectuate the trustmaker’s plan, asking the court to recognize trust ownership despite the informal nature of the transfer. This remedy helps align the property’s treatment with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
Title discrepancies often emerge during trust administration when trustees or beneficiaries try to sell, refinance, or otherwise manage property and find the recorded title does not match the trust records. In these cases, a Heggstad Petition clarifies ownership so transactions can proceed. The petition may be accompanied by supporting documents and declarations explaining the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances leading to the title mismatch, providing the probate court with the information needed to correct the record and permit proper administration.
If you face title irregularities in Galt, our firm is available to evaluate whether a Heggstad Petition can remedy the situation. We begin with a careful review of deeds, trust documents, and transaction histories to assess the best route forward. Whether the matter can be resolved by a focused petition or requires broader legal steps, we explain options, likely outcomes, and anticipated timelines. Clients receive practical guidance about evidence collection, notice to interested parties, and next steps to secure a court declaration that aligns property ownership with the trustmaker’s intent.
Our firm combines practical experience with a client-centered approach to navigate the complexities of trust title disputes. We prioritize clear, timely communication and focus on building the factual record courts rely on for Heggstad Petitions. Clients appreciate straightforward explanations of legal options, careful review of documents, and the disciplined approach we bring to preparing petitions and supporting declarations. We work to reduce uncertainty and move matters forward efficiently while protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries in a respectful manner.
We handle filings and court coordination so clients can focus on family and estate matters rather than procedural details. Our team assists with evidence gathering, witness statements, and responding to potential objections from interested parties. When negotiation is possible, we pursue cooperative resolutions to limit court time and expense. When court action is necessary, we prepare clear pleadings that explain why property should be treated as trust assets and support a durable judicial determination that facilitates administration and future transactions involving the property.
Clients benefit from practical guidance on interacting with title companies, lenders, and trustees during and after a petition. We help translate court orders into actionable steps for recording corrected deeds or updating title records, enabling sales, refinances, or distributions to proceed. Our aim is to provide reliable counsel that helps families resolve title issues and protect estate value while ensuring the trustmaker’s plan is respected and enforced according to applicable law in California.
Our process begins with a complimentary review of the available documents and a focused discussion about the property and the trust instrument. We then outline recommended next steps, including evidence collection, identification of interested parties, and anticipated court filings. If a petition is appropriate, we prepare a clear, well-supported petition and supporting declarations, file with the probate court, and manage notice and service requirements. We maintain regular updates throughout the process and coordinate steps needed to update title records after the court’s decision.
The first step is a detailed review of deeds, trust documents, escrow statements, and related records to determine whether a Heggstad Petition is the right remedy. This includes identifying who holds recorded title, locating the trust instrument and any amendments, and gathering any correspondence or transaction records that shed light on intent. We also compile a list of potential witnesses and interested parties who will need to be notified. This careful groundwork ensures the petition is supported by the strongest available evidence.
We identify and preserve all relevant documents, including the trust agreement, deeds, escrow files, bank records, and written communications that reference the transfer or management of the property. Early preservation avoids loss of key evidence and helps build a coherent narrative showing why the property should be recognized as trust property. We also advise clients on obtaining certified copies of recorded documents and assist in requesting records from third parties to ensure the petition is grounded in accurate, complete documentation.
We prepare declarations from individuals with firsthand knowledge of the transfer or the trustmaker’s intent, such as family members, trustees, or escrow officers. These factual statements describe the circumstances of the transfer and corroborate documentary evidence. Well-crafted declarations help the court understand the context surrounding the property and provide persuasive support for the petition. We guide witnesses on the types of details that strengthen the petition while ensuring statements comply with court requirements.
Once the petition and supporting declarations are ready, we file with the probate court in the county where the property is located and serve notice on all identified interested parties. Proper service and notice are essential to avoid procedural challenges and to give affected parties an opportunity to respond. We monitor any objections and, when appropriate, seek stipulations or negotiated resolutions. If objections arise, we prepare responsive filings and litigate the factual and legal issues as needed to obtain a clear court ruling.
We handle required service of the petition and track responses from interested parties. Timely, accurate notice is critical to preserve the court’s ability to issue a binding order. If parties consent, we may obtain stipulations to streamline the court’s review. If objections are filed, we analyze the grounds, prepare opposition materials, and advise clients on settlement opportunities or litigation strategies. Our goal is to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting the legal position of trustees and beneficiaries.
If the court schedules a hearing, we prepare a clear presentation of the facts and supporting evidence to demonstrate why the property should be treated as trust property. This includes organizing documentary exhibits, witness declarations, and any other relevant materials. We anticipate likely objections and prepare legal arguments to address contested points. Our preparation emphasizes clarity and concision to assist the court in reaching a reasoned determination that aligns with the available evidence and applicable California law.
After the court issues a ruling, we assist with implementing the order by preparing any necessary documents to update title records or instruct third parties on the change in ownership. This may include recording a certified copy of the court order, preparing revised deeds, and coordinating with title companies or lenders. Our role ensures that the judicial declaration translates into practical changes that allow trustees and beneficiaries to manage, sell, or refinance property consistent with the trustmaker’s intent.
We help clients record court orders and related documents with the county recorder to correct titles and ensure the property is reflected properly in public records. This step is important to prevent future disputes and to enable transactions like sales or refinances. We also advise on additional steps that may be needed to align related accounts or registrations with the court’s determination, and we provide guidance on communicating outcomes to interested parties and third-party entities.
After the matter is resolved in court, we continue to assist with follow-up tasks, such as responding to title company inquiries, preparing transfer documents, and advising trustees on proper administration under the trust. Ongoing support ensures that the court’s decision is implemented effectively and that the estate proceeds as intended. We remain available to address any subsequent questions or issues that arise, helping families complete the trust administration process with confidence and finality.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize property as belonging to a trust despite inconsistencies in recorded title or transfers. It is commonly used when a trustmaker intended certain property to be held by the trust, but deeds, titles, or other formal records do not reflect that intent. The petition sets out facts and evidence showing why the court should treat the property as trust property, helping trustees and beneficiaries proceed with administration and distribution according to the trustmaker’s plan. This petition is appropriate when the trust instrument and surrounding circumstances indicate a clear intent to include the asset in the trust, yet the recorded title does not match. The court evaluates documentary evidence, witness declarations, and transactional history to decide whether a judicial declaration is warranted. The goal is often to avoid opening a full probate by securing a focused judicial determination that aligns legal title with the trustmaker’s intent.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad Petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts and whether any interested parties contest the petition. In straightforward, uncontested cases with clear documentation and cooperation from beneficiaries, a petition can be resolved in a matter of months. The process includes collecting evidence, preparing the petition, serving notice, and obtaining the court’s order, all of which have procedural timelines that affect the overall duration. Contested matters take longer because the court may schedule hearings, require additional filings, or allow discovery. If objections arise, resolving factual disputes can extend the timeline significantly. Factors such as the need to gather records from third parties, coordinate with multiple jurisdictions, or address title company requirements can also influence how long the matter takes to reach final resolution.
Key evidence includes the trust document itself, deeds, escrow records, bank statements, emails or letters referring to the transfer, and any documents that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent. Certified copies of recorded documents and contemporaneous transaction records help show the timing and purpose of transfers. When direct documentary evidence is sparse, witness declarations from family members, trustees, or professionals involved in the transaction can provide corroborating details that explain why property should be treated as trust property. Organizing and preserving this evidence before filing is crucial. The court assesses the totality of the record, so even seemingly minor documents or consistent statements across multiple sources can strengthen a petition. Well-prepared declarations that describe the circumstances of the transfer and the trustmaker’s expressed wishes are particularly persuasive when paired with documentary proof.
A Heggstad Petition often avoids full probate when it successfully convinces the court that the property in question should be treated as trust property. Because it specifically addresses title recognition rather than broad estate administration, it can permit trustees and beneficiaries to proceed without opening probate. However, the petition’s success depends on the strength of the evidence and whether interested parties accept the court’s jurisdiction and the petition’s premise. If significant disputes arise or the facts suggest other probate matters must be addressed, the court could determine that additional proceedings are necessary. While a petition is a path to avoiding probate in many cases, it is not a universal guarantee, particularly when competing claims or unclear documentation complicate the situation.
Notice must be given to all interested parties who could be affected by the petition, such as beneficiaries named in the trust, trustees, heirs, and others who may have a legal interest in the property. The probate court’s rules specify who must be served and how notice should be provided. Proper service ensures that parties have an opportunity to object and that any court order will be binding and less susceptible to later challenge. Identifying interested parties early is part of the preparatory work. Attorneys often review trust documents and public records to compile a list of potential claimants and then ensure service is completed according to court requirements. Failure to provide correct notice can lead to procedural complications or require re-filing, so attention to this step is essential to a successful petition.
A Heggstad Petition can affect title insurance and refinancing because lenders and title companies often require clear, recorded title before approving loans or issuing policies. A judicial declaration recognizing the property as trust property provides the authoritative documentation title companies and lenders need to proceed. Recording a certified copy of the court order typically clears title defects and allows transactions such as sales or refinances to move forward. Until a court order is recorded, lenders or title insurers may be reluctant to accept inconsistent records. Filing a petition and obtaining an order is therefore often a necessary step when a title mismatch would otherwise prevent a homeowner from refinancing, selling, or securing financing. Addressing the matter through the courts can unlock these transactions by producing formal, recordable documentation.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad Petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a hearing to resolve factual and legal disputes. Objecting parties can challenge the evidence, assert competing claims to the property, or contend the petition is procedurally defective. Responding to objections requires careful factual development and legal argument to demonstrate why the court should grant the petition despite the objection. When objections arise, attorneys may engage in settlement discussions to narrow issues or secure stipulations that avoid a full hearing. If no agreement is reached, the matter proceeds through contested proceedings where the court assesses the credibility of evidence and arguments from all parties before reaching a final determination about trust ownership.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad Petition include negotiating a private settlement among interested parties, executing corrective deeds if all parties agree, or pursuing other probate filings when appropriate. Cooperation among beneficiaries and heirs can sometimes result in titles being corrected by mutual agreement without court involvement. When parties consent, recording a corrective deed or executing an affidavit that clarifies the trustmaker’s intent may be sufficient. However, when consensus is lacking or third parties such as title companies require judicial confirmation, a petition becomes the most reliable route. Deciding whether to try negotiation or proceed directly to a petition depends on the strength of the evidence, the willingness of interested parties to cooperate, and the urgency of resolving title problems for transactions like sales or refinancing.
Costs for filing a Heggstad Petition vary based on the amount of preparatory work, the complexity of the evidence, and whether the matter is contested. Expenses include court filing fees, service costs, and attorney fees for document collection, drafting the petition, and court appearances. In uncontested cases with straightforward records, total costs tend to be lower because the process is quicker and requires less litigation time. Contested cases involve additional expense due to motion practice, discovery, and hearings. The need to obtain third-party records or coordinate with multiple jurisdictions can also increase costs. A preliminary assessment helps estimate likely fees and provides clients with a clearer understanding of expected financial commitments before proceeding.
Before contacting a lawyer, gather all relevant documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, escrow statements, and any correspondence regarding the property. Make a list of people with knowledge of the transaction or the trustmaker’s intent and preserve contact details. This preparation allows counsel to evaluate the situation quickly and provide focused advice on next steps. Also prepare a brief chronology of events: who handled the transfer, when it occurred, and any communications about the property at the time of transfer. Clear, organized information speeds up the initial review and helps counsel determine whether a Heggstad Petition is the appropriate remedy and what evidence will be needed to support a successful filing.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas