A Heggstad petition can resolve situations where a decedent intended to fund a trust but assets remain titled in the individual’s name. This service helps families and fiduciaries identify mis-titled property, prepare court filings, and obtain judicial declarations that allow trust administration to proceed without full probate. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we guide clients through the statutory requirements, evidence collection, and procedural steps needed to demonstrate that assets were intended to be part of a trust. Our approach is practical, focused on preserving estate value and minimizing delay for beneficiaries and trustees in Laguna and throughout Sacramento County.
When a trust settlor passed away but failed to complete formal title transfers, beneficiaries and trustees commonly face uncertainty over property ownership. A properly framed Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that particular assets should be treated as trust property despite the lack of recorded transfer. This reduces the need for broader probate administration, often saving time and expense. We work with clients to collect documentary and testimonial evidence that supports the settlor’s intent, prepare clear legal arguments for the court, and coordinate related trust documents such as pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and assignments to trust.
Filing a Heggstad petition is important because it can prevent unnecessary probate proceedings and allow trust administration to proceed in a timely way. The petition provides a judicial determination that specific assets belong to a trust based on the decedent’s intent and surrounding circumstances, which helps trustees distribute assets according to the trust terms. Benefits include reducing expense, limiting public probate exposure, preserving tax and creditor considerations, and accelerating distributions to beneficiaries. For families in Laguna and Sacramento County, resolving title issues through the petition reduces friction among heirs and keeps estate administration aligned with the decedent’s documented estate plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California from a foundation built on responsive client service and thorough preparation of estate planning and trust administration matters. Our team guides trustees and family members through Heggstad petitions, trust administration, and related probate matters, focusing on clear communication and practical solutions. We assist in assembling trust documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and certifications of trust, and we draft assignments or petitions needed in court. Clients can expect careful document review, strategic court filings, and ongoing updates so families can move forward with confidence during a difficult time.
A Heggstad petition is a narrow legal remedy in California that addresses the specific problem of assets that were intended to be placed in a trust but remain titled to the decedent. The petition asks the probate court to recognize the trust’s ownership so the trustee can administer those assets without full probate. Understanding when to pursue this remedy requires careful analysis of trust documents, deeds, account statements, and communication showing intent. We evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is the most efficient path based on asset type, timing, and potential creditor or beneficiary objections that could influence the outcome in Sacramento County courts.
Not every mis-titled asset requires a Heggstad petition. Some items can be transferred by straightforward trustee actions or via a small estate affidavit, while others may demand court intervention. The key is evidence that the decedent intended the property to be held in the trust. Typical evidence includes trust terms, beneficiary nominations like pour-over wills, transfers on death designations, trust-related assignments, or contemporaneous statements. We help clients gather and present that evidence in a manner that addresses likely objections and supports a favorable judicial declaration, reducing delays in trust administration.
A Heggstad petition is a petition to the probate court requesting a determination that particular assets are trust property despite being titled in the decedent’s personal name. The petition typically explains the nature of the mis-titling, provides documentary and testimonial proof of intent to fund the trust, and asks the court to order that the assets be treated as part of the trust estate. Once approved, the trustee can take custody of the assets and proceed with administration. The process requires careful legal drafting and factual support to meet California statutory and case law standards in a way that withstands scrutiny and potential objections.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on a combination of documentary evidence, witness statements, and precise legal argument. Documents commonly include the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, assignments to the trust, and relevant correspondence. The process involves preparing the petition, filing in the proper probate court, serving interested parties, and responding to any opposition. Courts will weigh the totality of evidence to determine intent. We prepare petitions with attention to evidentiary detail and procedural requirements, aiming to streamline the court’s decision and enable the trustee to complete trust administration without unnecessary complications.
Understanding core terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate Heggstad petitions. This glossary explains legal phrases and documents frequently encountered during trust funding disputes. Clear definitions empower clients to provide the right documentation and understand the options available when assets remain titled in a decedent’s name. Common items include revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, assignments to trust, probate proceedings, and declarations of trust ownership. Our goal is to demystify the terminology so you can make informed decisions about filing a petition or pursuing alternative methods to transfer assets into the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in California probate court asking the judge to declare that certain property is owned by a trust despite appearing in the decedent’s personal name. It relies on evidence showing the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust, such as the trust instrument, deeds, account records, and statements of the decedent. The court’s declaration permits the trustee to treat those assets as trust property for administration and distribution, helping avoid broader probate proceedings when title formalities were not completed before death.
A pour-over will operates alongside a trust and ensures that any assets left outside the trust at the decedent’s death are transferred into the trust during administration. It typically names the trust as the beneficiary of remaining probate assets and acts as a safety net for incomplete funding. While a pour-over will does not itself avoid probate for assets titled in the decedent’s personal name, it clarifies the decedent’s intent that those assets should ultimately belong to the trust and can support a Heggstad petition or other court filings.
A certification of trust is a condensed, court-ready document that summarizes key information about a trust without revealing private terms. It typically lists the trustee, the trust date, and the powers granted to the trustee, and is often used to prove a trustee’s authority to third parties such as banks and title companies. Providing a certification with a Heggstad petition helps demonstrate the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority to request that assets be recognized as trust property.
An assignment to trust is a document signed by the decedent during life that transfers specific property into the trust. When present, assignments are strong evidence of intent to fund the trust, and they simplify administration after death. If no assignment was completed before death, other evidence such as deeds, beneficiary designations, and contemporaneous statements can support a Heggstad petition. Where feasible, trustees may execute post-death assignments or seek court orders to clear title for assets intended to be trust property.
When mis-titled assets surface after a decedent’s death, there are several paths to consider. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare assets as trust property based on intent. Alternative options include full probate administration, small estate procedures for certain low-value assets, transfer on death designations, beneficiary claims, or negotiated transfers with third parties. The best route depends on asset type, value, presence of documentary evidence, and the likelihood of objections. We evaluate these factors and recommend the solution that best preserves estate value and aligns with the decedent’s plan while minimizing time and expense.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the decedent left clear written evidence of intent to fund the trust, such as signed assignments, deeds naming the trust, or beneficiary designations that reference the trust. In these cases, rather than opening a full probate administration, a Heggstad petition or simple administrative transfer can often rectify title problems. The presence of decisive documents reduces the need for extended litigation, because the court can rely on recorded proof to support a declaration that the assets belong to the trust for purposes of distribution and management.
When the assets in question are modest in value and there are no likely disputes among beneficiaries or creditors, practitioners may pursue informal transfers or small estate procedures rather than a full Heggstad petition or probate. If transfer by affidavit or direct negotiation with institutions is feasible, that approach saves time and cost. Even with low-value assets, proper documentation should be retained to support the transfer and to protect trustees from later claims. We assist clients in identifying when minimal procedures are sufficient and when court involvement is warranted.
Comprehensive legal services are often needed when assets are substantial, title issues are complex, or the risk of contested claims is high. Large real property, retirement accounts, or accounts with competing beneficiaries require meticulous analysis and often litigation to ensure proper ownership is established. A robust legal approach includes detailed evidence gathering, preparation of affidavits, potential discovery, and court advocacy to secure a binding judicial declaration. This thorough process protects trustees and beneficiaries and reduces the risk of future challenges that could unsettle the estate plan.
If beneficiaries dispute ownership of assets or creditors assert claims against the decedent’s estate, a comprehensive legal strategy is necessary to defend the trust and preserve assets for intended beneficiaries. Handling contested matters requires procedural knowledge, factual investigation, and strategic court filings to address competing interests. A careful, methodical approach can limit exposure, negotiate resolutions where appropriate, and present persuasive arguments to the court. Our team prepares for potential disputes and seeks to resolve matters efficiently while protecting the trust’s assets and beneficiaries’ rights.
A comprehensive approach reduces the chance of later challenges and ensures that all relevant legal remedies are considered. By thoroughly documenting the decedent’s intent, reviewing account histories, and preparing well-supported court filings, trustees preserve estate value and shorten administration time. This approach also clarifies fiduciary duties and provides trustees with stronger protection against claims from heirs or creditors. Where multiple assets and accounts are involved, comprehensive handling coordinates transfers, title corrections, and tax considerations to avoid unanticipated consequences during trust administration.
Comprehensive legal work also supports smoother beneficiary relations by resolving ambiguity and demonstrating that the trustee has followed a careful, fact-based process. Court approvals obtained through proper filings reduce later disputes and provide finality for distributions. Thorough representation helps trustees balance competing priorities, address creditor timelines, and avoid piecemeal transfers that could lead to confusion. In short, investing in a complete review and appropriately tailored legal actions often results in fewer delays and greater certainty for families handling trust administration in Laguna and Sacramento County.
Creating a strong documentary and testimonial record supports a trustee’s position and reduces the risk of successful challenges to an attempted transfer. A comprehensive approach documents intent through multiple sources—trust instruments, deeds, bank records, and witness statements—and presents them coherently to the court. That level of preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable judicial determination and gives trustees greater confidence when carrying out distributions. It also helps manage creditor timelines and legal claims, lowering the possibility of post-distribution disputes that can reverse or complicate completed transfers.
When legal issues are addressed thoroughly from the outset, resolution tends to be faster because the court can rely on a complete record and concise legal arguments. Clear documentation lets trustees proceed with confidence, reducing administrative delays and helping beneficiaries receive their inheritances sooner. A methodical process also streamlines interactions with financial institutions and title companies that require verification of trust ownership. Overall, a comprehensive approach leads to more predictable outcomes and a smoother administration for families navigating the transfer of mis-titled assets.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, any deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, assignments, and related correspondence. Maintaining an organized file of original or certified documents speeds the review process and strengthens the factual record needed for court filings. Early organization also helps identify whether alternative remedies exist, such as account transfer forms or small estate procedures. Proper documentation can make the difference between submitting a straightforward petition and engaging in protracted discovery, so trustees should prioritize document gathering as soon as a potential mis-titled asset is discovered.
Assess whether interested parties are likely to contest the transfer and consider whether a negotiated resolution is feasible. If disputes seem probable, prepare for the possibility of contested court proceedings by preserving evidence, obtaining witness statements, and planning legal arguments. Where relationships permit, mediation or facilitated discussions can sometimes resolve disagreements early. Preparing for both negotiated and contested paths helps trustees manage expectations and timelines and reduces the chance of surprise litigation that could disrupt administration and increase costs for beneficiaries.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s name and you need a clear legal path to allow the trustee to administer those assets. The petition can provide judicial recognition of trust ownership, enabling efficient management and distribution while avoiding broader probate. It is particularly valuable when documentary evidence supports the decedent’s intent but an institution or title record has not been updated. Trustees, beneficiaries, and family members often pursue this remedy to protect estate value and honor the decedent’s plan without unnecessary delay.
A petition may also be appropriate when piecemeal transfers are impractical or when larger assets like real estate or retirement accounts are at issue. If creditor claims or competing beneficiary assertions are likely, a court order provides a more secure foundation for administration than informal transfers. For clients in Laguna and Sacramento County, seeking a judicial declaration often reduces future disputes and gives the trustee the authority needed to complete trust administration in accordance with the trust document and applicable law.
Typical circumstances include deceased settlors who executed a trust but neglected to re-title real property or accounts, bank or brokerage accounts that remain in the settlor’s name, and deeds that were never recorded. Other situations arise when a pour-over will funnels assets into a trust during probate but immediate trust administration is preferable. Executors, trustees, and beneficiaries commonly encounter these issues after death and seek judicial guidance to place assets under trust control. Addressing these circumstances promptly prevents delay and helps align property ownership with estate planning documents.
Real property often remains titled in the decedent’s name despite a trust instrument indicating the property should be held by the trust. This can occur when deeds were not executed or recorded before death. Because real estate typically has significant value, its mis-titling can impede administration and distribution. A Heggstad petition can be used to ask the court to declare the property part of the trust based on evidence of intent, enabling the trustee to transfer title into the trust or complete a sale consistent with the trust terms.
Accounts that were intended to be retitled in the name of the trust but were left in the decedent’s name are common. Financial institutions may refuse to transfer or release funds without a court order, particularly when account ownership is unclear. A Heggstad petition can provide the legal authority for trustees to access and manage those funds for estate purposes and distributions. Detailed account statements, beneficiary forms, and trustee certifications can support the petition and speed resolution of locked accounts.
Sometimes the decedent intended to assign property to the trust and may have prepared documents but failed to complete or record them. Missing signatures, unrecorded deeds, or incomplete assignments can leave ownership ambiguous. A court declaration through a Heggstad petition allows those assets to be treated as trust property based on the overall evidence of intent. Trustees should preserve any drafts, correspondence, or third-party confirmations that indicate the decedent’s plan, as these items strengthen the petition and reduce the risk of contested outcomes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Laguna and Sacramento County, offering practical guidance for trustees, beneficiaries, and families dealing with mis-titled assets. We provide personalized attention to gather necessary documents, explain options, and prepare filings designed to obtain clear court declarations when needed. Our firm coordinates with financial institutions, title companies, and other professionals to facilitate transfers and resolve title problems. Clients appreciate a steady, organized approach that focuses on achieving timely resolutions while protecting estate assets and honoring the settlor’s intentions.
Our firm combines practical knowledge of California probate procedures with a client-focused process for handling trust funding issues. We prioritize communication, timely drafting of petitions, and careful evidence gathering so courts have the documentation they need to grant declarations. Trustees and families benefit from clear explanations of options and step-by-step guidance through filing, service, and any hearings. We work to minimize administrative delays and help clients understand the implications of each path, whether informal transfer, a Heggstad petition, or broader probate.
We understand that these matters often arise during stressful times, so we aim to reduce burden by handling procedural details and coordinating with institutions to obtain necessary records. Our team prepares petitions and supporting declarations with attention to legal and factual clarity, helping courts reach timely decisions. We also advise trustees on post-declaration steps such as recording deeds, transferring accounts, and completing distributions in accordance with the trust instrument and California law.
Clients receive candid assessments of likely outcomes and cost-effective strategies to address mis-titled assets. Whether the path forward is a limited administrative transfer or a court petition, we tailor our approach to the specific circumstances and prioritize solutions that align with the decedent’s documented plan. Our goal is to help trustees and beneficiaries resolve title problems efficiently so estate administration proceeds with minimal interruption.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and any related documents, followed by targeted evidence gathering to support a petition. We prepare a focused filing that outlines the property at issue, summarizes the documentary record, and presents declarations from witnesses if necessary. After filing, we serve interested parties and respond to any inquiries or objections. If a hearing is required, we present the case to the probate court with the goal of obtaining a clear judicial declaration that permits the trustee to treat the assets as trust property and proceed with administration and distribution.
The first step is a thorough review of trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any assignments or correspondence that reflect intent to fund the trust. We identify gaps and determine what additional evidence—such as witness declarations or institutional records—is needed to support a petition. This preparation establishes the factual foundation required by the probate court and helps us gauge whether a Heggstad petition or an alternative remedy is most appropriate for the situation in Laguna and Sacramento County.
We work with clients to find and organize documents that demonstrate intent, including trust instruments, deeds, bank records, and any communications from the decedent. Where available, witness statements from family members, attorneys, or professionals who observed the decedent’s intent can be collected and prepared as declarations. These pieces of evidence are assembled into a coherent file that supports the factual assertions in the petition and anticipates potential objections from interested parties.
Different property types raise different concerns: real estate often requires deeds and title research, while bank accounts and investment accounts require institutional documentation. Retirement accounts and beneficiary-designated assets may follow distinct rules. We evaluate each asset’s legal status to determine the necessary filings and to prepare a petition that addresses the court’s likely questions. Understanding the legal nuances helps shape the strongest approach and avoids unnecessary delay or additional filings.
After gathering evidence, we draft a detailed petition describing the property, the decedent’s intent, and the supporting documentation. The petition includes factual declarations, copies of key documents, and legal arguments tailored to California probate law and relevant case authority. We file the petition in the appropriate probate court in Sacramento County or another proper jurisdiction and ensure that all service requirements for interested parties are met so the court can consider the matter promptly.
Factual declarations explain the circumstances of the alleged intended transfer and provide personal attestation where appropriate. These declarations often come from trustees, close family members, or professionals who can corroborate the decedent’s intent. Clear, well-organized declarations help the court evaluate the evidence without unnecessary confusion and demonstrate why the property should be recognized as trust assets despite the absence of formal retitling.
Once the petition is prepared, we file with the probate court and complete statutory service requirements for beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors. Proper service ensures due process and allows interested parties to respond or appear at any hearing. Timely and accurate service reduces the risk of procedural defects that could delay a court ruling. We monitor responses and advise clients on next steps based on any opposition or requests for additional information.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition and the supporting evidence, address questions from the judge, and respond to any objections from interested parties. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order or judgment recognizing the property as trust assets. After the order, we assist with implementing the court’s directives, such as recording deeds, updating account titles, and coordinating distributions in accordance with the trust instrument. We also ensure necessary documentation is retained to protect the trustee from future claims.
At any hearing, we present the assembled evidence and explain the legal basis for treating the assets as trust property. Our filing materials and declarations are organized to answer the court’s likely concerns and to address any opposing arguments. Clear presentation of facts and law helps the judge reach a timely determination, allowing the trustee to carry out necessary actions to manage and distribute the assets according to the trust terms.
After obtaining an order, we assist the trustee in implementing the court’s directives by recording deeds, providing the order to financial institutions, and completing any administrative tasks needed to transfer assets into the trust or to distribute proceeds. Proper follow-through ensures the estate plan is executed as intended and reduces the likelihood of future disputes. We document each step to provide a clear record of compliance with the court’s decision and to protect the trustee’s position.
A Heggstad petition is a formal request to the probate court asking for a declaration that certain property is trust property despite remaining titled in the decedent’s personal name. The petition relies on evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to be included in the trust and is commonly used when formal retitling was not completed before death. Trustees and beneficiaries usually consider a petition when informal transfers are impossible, when institutions refuse to transfer ownership without a court order, or when asset values and legal clarity make a judicial declaration the most prudent path. Before filing, it is important to assess the strength of the available evidence and whether alternative remedies exist, such as small estate procedures or direct institutional transfers using a certification of trust. We carefully evaluate the situation, help gather supporting documents such as deeds, trust instruments, account statements, and witness declarations, and advise on the likely benefits and timeline for a petition in the relevant probate court. This helps clients choose the most efficient remedy for their circumstances.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, the completeness of the record, and whether interested parties file objections. In uncontested matters where documentation is thorough, courts may issue decisions in a matter of weeks to a few months. If hearings are required or if there are contested issues, the process can extend longer. Local probate court caseloads and the need for additional evidence or discovery also influence the timeline, so each matter is unique in its duration and complexity. To reduce delays, we prioritize early evidence gathering, precise petition drafting, and correct service of interested parties. Prompt coordination with financial institutions and title companies can also expedite resolution. Clients are kept informed at each stage, and we aim to move matters efficiently so the trustee can begin administration without unnecessary interruption.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, assignments, beneficiary designations, a certification of trust, and any written communication that reflects the decedent’s intention to fund the trust. Declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s intent or who assisted with the transaction can be persuasive. The stronger and more contemporaneous the evidence, the more straightforward it is to obtain a court declaration recognizing the asset as trust property. Where formal transfer documents are missing, corroborating materials such as drafts, emails, bank correspondence, and testimony from professionals who worked with the decedent may also be useful. We assist in identifying and assembling relevant materials, preparing declaratory statements, and organizing the factual narrative in a way that anticipates and addresses potential challenges from other parties.
In some situations, financial institutions may allow trustees to access accounts with presentation of a certification of trust, a death certificate, and other required forms, particularly when ownership is straightforward and uncontested. However, many banks and brokers have policies that require a court order when accounts remain solely in the decedent’s name. Institution-specific rules and the value or complexity of the account determine whether institutional cooperation is possible without court involvement. If an institution refuses to transfer or release funds, a Heggstad petition can provide the legal authority needed for the trustee to manage the accounts. We communicate with institutions early to understand their requirements and, when necessary, prepare filings that meet court standards and institutional expectations so assets can be accessed and administered appropriately.
A Heggstad petition can reduce the need for broader probate by allowing specific assets to be recognized as trust property, but it does not automatically eliminate probate for assets governed by other instruments or for matters outside the scope of the petition. If all assets intended for the trust can be declared trust property, a Heggstad petition may significantly limit probate involvement. However, the overall estate situation, including assets not covered by the trust and creditor claims, may still require probate steps. Each estate is different, so it is important to evaluate the full array of assets and legal issues. We help clients determine whether a Heggstad petition will effectively resolve title problems or whether probate or other processes are necessary for a complete administration of the decedent’s estate.
A pour-over will is designed to transfer assets into a trust through probate if they were not retitled during the decedent’s life. While it reflects the decedent’s intent that remaining probate assets should go into the trust, a pour-over will alone does not avoid probate for assets that remain in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition, by contrast, seeks a judicial declaration that specific assets are already trust property despite the lack of formal retitling, potentially avoiding the need for probate over those assets. If both instruments exist, the pour-over will can support the argument that the decedent intended the assets to belong to the trust and may serve as corroborative evidence in a Heggstad petition. We review both documents and related records to craft a coherent presentation that demonstrates the decedent’s intent and supports the most efficient administration path.
Common objections to Heggstad petitions include claims that the decedent did not intend the transfer, that title reflects legal ownership rather than intent, or that creditors have superior claims to the asset. Objections may also come from beneficiaries who believe they are entitled to assets outside the trust. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence, and contested matters typically require additional factual development, possible discovery, and legal argument to resolve competing claims. To address potential objections, we prepare comprehensive documentation and persuasive declarations, anticipate opposing positions, and advise on settlement or litigation strategies where appropriate. The goal is to present the court with a clear, well-supported case for why the property should be treated as trust property while protecting the trustee’s ability to administer assets in a reliable manner.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include pursuing small estate procedures for qualifying personal property, using institutional transfer forms that accept a certification of trust, negotiating transfers with co-owners or lienholders, or completing a limited probate administration where appropriate. In some instances, straightforward affidavits or pay-on-death designations may resolve matters without court intervention, depending on asset type and value. Choosing the right alternative requires careful examination of the assets and governing documents. We evaluate these options and recommend the most efficient path based on the situation. Where institutions will cooperate, informal transfers can be faster and less costly. When institutions or title records require legal authority, a Heggstad petition may still be the most practical and protective course for trustees and beneficiaries.
When filing a Heggstad petition, statutory notice and service rules must be followed. Interested parties typically include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs apparent, the personal representative of the decedent’s estate if one exists, and known creditors where applicable. Proper service ensures that those with a legal interest in the property have the opportunity to respond and protects the court’s jurisdiction over the matter. Failing to serve required parties can result in procedural delay or invalidation of the court’s order. We identify and serve all necessary parties in accordance with local rules and statutory requirements, document service carefully, and respond to any contests or requests for additional time. By handling service and notice precisely, we reduce procedural risk and help the court move efficiently toward a determination.
The cost to prepare and file a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the matter, the amount of evidence needed, whether the petition is contested, and local court fees. Uncontested matters with straightforward documentation typically cost less and may be completed more quickly, while contested or complex asset histories require additional preparation and legal time. Anticipated costs should factor in attorney time, court filing fees, and any costs for obtaining certified documents or conducting title searches. We provide clear estimates after an initial review and discuss cost-effective strategies to achieve the desired result. Where possible, we aim to resolve matters through focused filings and negotiated solutions to limit expense while protecting the trustee’s authority and beneficiaries’ interests.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas