When life circumstances change, revising a trust can help align estate planning documents with current goals and family needs. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in Parkway, California, we assist clients who need to pursue a trust modification petition to alter terms, update beneficiaries, or correct drafting errors. A trust modification petition is a formal legal request filed in the appropriate probate or superior court to obtain permission to change an irrevocable trust or to clarify ambiguous provisions. This guide explains the process, timelines, and considerations specific to Parkway and Sacramento County to help you make informed decisions.
Pursuing a trust modification petition can be a thoughtful step when circumstances such as changes in family relationships, tax law, or the financial landscape make existing trust terms impractical. Whether you want to adjust distribution provisions, address incapacity planning, or correct administrative issues like trustee powers, the petition process provides a pathway for court-ordered changes. This page outlines how petitions typically proceed in California courts, what evidence is helpful, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman approach each matter with careful legal analysis and personalized client communication to protect your interests and those of your beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition offers a clear legal mechanism to adapt an existing trust to changed circumstances without creating a new trust or risking unintended consequences. This approach preserves continuity for asset management while addressing issues such as changed beneficiary needs, altered tax considerations, or newly discovered drafting errors. Filing a petition allows the court to review the requested changes and issue an order that provides legal certainty to trustees and beneficiaries. For many families and individuals in Parkway, seeking a formal modification can prevent disputes, clarify fiduciary responsibilities, and ensure distributions reflect the settlor’s current intentions and practical realities.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose and serving Parkway bring decades of practice in California estate planning and trust administration. Our team assists clients with a wide variety of trust matters, including revocable living trusts, irrevocable arrangements, and petitions to modify or interpret trust terms. We focus on careful case evaluation, clear communication, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances. Our goal is to guide clients through the legal process efficiently, preparing thorough court filings and advocating for orderly outcomes that minimize disruption for trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties.
A trust modification petition is a legal proceeding used to request changes to the terms or administration of a trust when the settlor is unavailable to amend it directly or when the trust is irrevocable. In California, petitions are typically filed in the superior court in the county where the trust is administered. Grounds for modification can include mistake, ambiguity, changed circumstances, or the need to effectuate the settlor’s probable intent. Supporting documentation such as the trust instrument, declarations, financial records, and witness statements often accompanies the petition to demonstrate why the court should approve the requested change.
The court evaluates trust modification petitions with an emphasis on preserving the settlor’s intent and protecting beneficiaries’ rights. Parties who may be affected are given notice and an opportunity to object, and the judge reviews factual and legal arguments before issuing an order. The process can involve negotiation, settlement, or litigation if disputes arise among trustees, beneficiaries, or creditors. Effective representation focuses on preparing a persuasive petition, managing communications among interested parties, and presenting evidence that supports a requested modification while minimizing costs and delays for everyone involved.
A trust modification petition asks the court to permit a change to a trust’s terms or interpretation when direct amendments by the settlor are not feasible or when legal issues require judicial resolution. Relief sought can include rewriting ambiguous language, excusing literal terms that produce unintended results, reallocating assets, or updating trustee powers to reflect current legal or practical needs. The petition explains the factual background, legal basis, and proposed revisions, and it requests an order that authorizes the trustee to carry out the changes in a manner that aligns with the settlor’s likely intentions and protects beneficiary interests under California law.
A successful trust modification petition typically includes a clear statement of the requested changes, supporting declarations from knowledgeable witnesses, and documentary evidence such as the trust instrument, financial statements, and correspondence. The filing must meet local court requirements for notice and form, and interested parties must be served so they can participate or object. The court may hold a hearing to consider any objections, examine evidence, and assess whether the proposed modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and public policy. The final order clarifies the trust terms and authorizes trustees to act under the revised provisions.
Understanding basic terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and evaluate options. Key phrases include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, revocable trust, irrevocable trust, Heggstad petition, pour-over will, and trust certification. Familiarity with these terms clarifies who can petition the court, what evidence is relevant, and what legal standards apply. This glossary section defines common terms and explains how they apply to modification petitions, so clients in Parkway and Sacramento County can communicate effectively with counsel and make informed decisions about filing or responding to a petition.
Settlor refers to the person who creates the trust and makes the original decisions about how assets are managed and distributed. When a settlor is no longer able to revise the trust directly due to incapacity or death, beneficiaries or trustees may pursue court petitions to address unforeseen problems or to request clarifying changes. Courts strive to honor the settlor’s intent when evaluating petitions, so documentation that reflects the settlor’s goals—such as prior drafts, letters, or consistent distribution patterns—can be important evidence in support of a requested modification.
A Heggstad petition is a specific California procedure used to establish that certain assets belong to a trust despite not being formally transferred into the trust before the settlor’s death. This helps confirm that a trustee has authority to manage and distribute those assets under the trust terms. When trust assets are incomplete or titles were not updated, a Heggstad petition may be filed to present documents and evidence showing the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust, thus avoiding lengthy probate for those items and allowing distributions to proceed according to trust provisions.
A trustee is the individual or institution responsible for administering a trust according to its terms and applicable law. Trustees have fiduciary duties to manage trust assets prudently, provide accounting to beneficiaries, and distribute assets as directed. When trustees seek to modify trust terms through a court petition, they must present a factual and legal justification for the requested change and ensure proper notice to beneficiaries. Trustees considering a petition must balance legal obligations with the practical goal of preserving value and reducing conflict among interested parties.
A pour-over will works alongside a trust to transfer any assets remaining in a decedent’s name into the trust upon death. This instrument ensures assets not retitled into the trust during life are captured and distributed under the trust’s terms. In cases where trust modification or clarification is needed after death, the interplay between a pour-over will and the trust can be relevant to a petition. Courts may consider how the pour-over will reflects overall estate planning goals when deciding whether to permit requested modifications that affect asset distribution.
When addressing trust problems, clients can pursue a range of legal options from limited filings to comprehensive modification petitions. Limited filings might seek narrow relief such as clarifying a single ambiguous clause, confirming ownership of particular assets, or addressing an administrative error. Comprehensive petitions address broader reorganizations of trust terms, changes in beneficiary designations, or adjustments to trustee powers. Selecting the right path depends on the scope of the issue, the settlor’s likely intent, the interests of beneficiaries, and the potential for contest. Counsel evaluates options and recommends the least disruptive and most effective route based on these factors.
A limited petition can be appropriate when a trust contains a clear drafting error or ambiguous language that yields unintended results. In such instances, evidence like earlier drafts, consistent distributions, or communications from the settlor may demonstrate intended meaning, allowing the court to reform or construe the term without altering the trust’s overall structure. This targeted approach often reduces expense and conflict because it focuses only on the specific language at issue and leaves the rest of the trust intact for straightforward administration.
When certain assets were intended to be in the trust but were not formally transferred, a limited petition such as a Heggstad petition may confirm those assets belong to the trust. This action avoids full probate administration and clarifies trustee authority for those items. A focused filing that presents deeds, account records, or other documentation can resolve ownership questions efficiently. This constrained approach is well suited for cases where the broader trust terms remain appropriate and only title or administrative issues need judicial resolution.
A comprehensive trust modification petition is often necessary when events substantially alter the settlor’s original assumptions, such as major changes in family structure, significant asset growth or decline, or new tax or creditor concerns. These circumstances may require substantive alterations to distribution plans, trustee powers, or protective provisions to ensure the trust remains effective. A thorough petition presents a full picture of the changed circumstances and offers a proposed restructuring that seeks to preserve the settlor’s intent as much as possible in light of new realities.
When multiple provisions of a trust create uncertainty or when there are disputes among beneficiaries and trustees that affect overall administration, a comprehensive petition can provide a single forum to resolve interconnected issues. This avoids piecemeal litigation that could produce inconsistent results. A full petition enables the court to consider the trust holistically, propose an integrated remedy, and issue clear instructions for administration going forward. Such an approach often reduces long-term costs and clarifies roles, duties, and distributions for all parties involved.
A comprehensive petition can provide legal clarity and finality by addressing all related trust issues in a single proceeding. This reduces the risk of conflicting rulings and minimizes future litigation that might arise if only one component is changed. By presenting the court with a full factual record and integrated proposed modifications, trustees can secure an authoritative order that streamlines administration, protects beneficiaries’ rights, and aligns trust operations with present-day goals and legal standards in California.
Filing a comprehensive petition also supports thorough notice and participation by interested parties, which can enhance the legitimacy of the court’s decision and reduce the likelihood of successful challenges later. The process allows for negotiation and settlement before a hearing, which may result in agreed-upon changes that preserve family relationships while achieving practical results. For trustees and beneficiaries who seek durable solutions that reflect current circumstances, a comprehensive approach often provides the most reliable path to lasting resolution.
One key benefit of a comprehensive petition is the clarity it brings to trust administration by resolving multiple ambiguities and conflicts at once. Court-ordered modifications that reflect a holistic view of the trust reduce the likelihood of piecemeal disputes and subsequent litigation. A single, well-drafted court order gives trustees clear authority to act and reassures beneficiaries that the changes have been reviewed and approved under judicial standards, which can deter future objections and support smoother distribution and management processes.
Comprehensive modifications allow the court to consider the settlor’s broader goals and ensure that any changes remain consistent with those objectives. When circumstances evolve, a court-supervised modification can adapt the trust while preserving the underlying intent reflected in the original documents. This continuity benefits both trustees and beneficiaries by maintaining the trust’s guiding principles, ensuring fair administration, and applying legal standards that honor the settlor’s likely expectations under present conditions.
Assemble all relevant documents before filing a petition, including the trust instrument and any prior drafts, deeds or account statements for assets intended to be in the trust, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent, and records of past distributions. Detailed documentation supports factual assertions in the petition and helps the court understand the background and rationale for requested changes. Providing a clear evidentiary record reduces the risk of contested hearings and may encourage constructive settlement among interested parties by clarifying factual matters early in the process.
Explore negotiation or mediation when disputes arise, as these paths often produce faster and less adversarial resolutions than fully litigated hearings. Mediation can encourage creative solutions that preserve relationships while addressing legal and practical concerns. Even when litigation proceeds, documenting good-faith settlement efforts demonstrates a cooperative approach to the court. Counsel can facilitate discussions that narrow issues for the judge, lower costs, and yield outcomes aligned with the settlor’s intent and beneficiaries’ interests.
Families consider trust modification petitions for many reasons, including evolving family dynamics, outdated distribution provisions, tax law changes, trustee incapacity, or drafting errors that undermine administration. A petition can fix problematic language, add or remove beneficiaries where appropriate, modify trustee powers, or clarify administrative rules to reflect current needs. For individuals in Parkway and greater Sacramento County, seeking judicial approval for modifications often provides the clear legal authority needed to manage assets and protect beneficiary interests over the long term.
In some cases, a trust was intended to operate in a certain way but events have rendered those terms impractical or unfair. Filing a petition allows parties to explain those circumstances to the court with supporting evidence and request adjustments consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. Whether you face tax consequences, creditor claims, or changing support needs for beneficiaries, the petition process provides a mechanism for judicial oversight and a path to orderly transition that maintains continuity in asset management and distribution.
Typical circumstances prompting a petition include discovering assets that were never transferred to the trust, trust provisions that create unintended tax consequences, errors or ambiguities in drafting, disputes among beneficiaries regarding distributions, and the need to adjust trustee powers for practical administration. Life events such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or changes in financial need can motivate beneficiaries or trustees to seek court-approved changes. Recognizing these triggers early enables more efficient preparation and a clearer path to resolution through the court process.
It is common to discover that some assets were intended to be part of the trust but were never retitled or transferred. When this happens, a Heggstad petition or related filing may be used to show the court that those assets were meant to be trust property and to allow the trustee to manage and distribute them under the trust terms. Addressing these issues through the court avoids separate probate proceedings for those assets and helps keep administration aligned with the overall estate plan.
Ambiguous language or conflicting provisions within a trust can create uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries and may lead to disputes. When interpretation questions arise, a petition seeking clarification or reformation can present evidence that illuminates the settlor’s probable intent and asks the court to resolve the inconsistency. Clarifying the trust document improves administrative efficiency and reduces the risk of contested distributions or future litigation among interested parties in Parkway and Sacramento County.
Significant life changes such as the birth of grandchildren, beneficiary disability, divorce, or changing financial circumstances can make existing trust terms obsolete or unfair. A petition enables trustees or beneficiaries to request modifications that better provide for current needs while remaining faithful to the settlor’s overarching goals. Courts will consider the totality of circumstances and supporting evidence when deciding whether proposed adjustments align with the settlor’s probable intent and the best interests of those who stand to be affected.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local legal support for residents of Parkway and Sacramento County who face trust-related questions. Our office assists with drafting and filing petitions, preparing declarations and evidence, providing notice to interested parties, and representing clients at hearings. We emphasize clear communication about the process, timelines, and likely outcomes to help clients make informed choices. Contact our firm to discuss your situation, learn about available options, and start assembling the necessary documentation for a petition or related filing.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for responsive, client-focused representation in trust matters throughout Parkway and nearby counties. We approach each case with careful legal analysis and practical problem-solving, helping clients navigate complex paperwork and court procedures. Our attorneys prioritize clear communication, timely updates, and thoughtful advocacy to help move matters forward while protecting client interests and beneficiary rights under California law.
We tailor our services to each family’s circumstances, whether the matter calls for a focused petition, a comprehensive modification, or a Heggstad filing to confirm asset ownership. We work to reduce unnecessary delays and prepare persuasive filings that explain the factual background and legal reasons for requested changes. Our aim is to achieve durable outcomes that provide clarity for trustees and beneficiaries and support smooth administration going forward.
From initial evaluation through court hearings, our team guides clients through procedural requirements, evidence collection, and notice obligations. We also encourage exploring mediation or settlement where appropriate to resolve disputes efficiently. By combining careful preparation with strategic advocacy, we assist clients in securing court orders that reflect the settlor’s likely intent and address present-day needs, helping families move forward with confidence and clear legal authority.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to understand the trust, the issues prompting modification, and the identities of interested parties. We review trust documents, asset records, and relevant communications to assess the appropriate legal path. Next, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, ensure proper service and notice, and attempt to resolve disputes through negotiation or mediation when feasible. If a hearing is required, we present a focused record to the court and advocate for an order that accomplishes the necessary adjustments while protecting beneficiaries’ interests and maintaining administrative clarity.
In the initial stage, we evaluate the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and asset records to determine the scope of the issue and whether a limited filing or comprehensive petition is appropriate. This review helps identify evidence that supports the settlor’s probable intent, such as earlier drafts, correspondence, or consistent distribution patterns. We also identify all interested parties who must be notified and assess potential objections. A thorough evaluation at the outset helps shape a strategy that addresses the legal and practical aspects of the matter.
Collecting documentary evidence and preparing detailed declarations are essential to a persuasive petition. We assist clients in compiling trust instruments, account statements, deeds, letters, and witness statements that corroborate the settlor’s intent and explain the need for modification. Careful drafting of declarations helps present a coherent narrative for the court, showing both factual circumstances and legal justification for the requested changes. This step is designed to minimize surprises and strengthen the case for judicial approval.
Identifying and properly notifying beneficiaries, successor trustees, and other interested parties is a procedural priority. We ensure service complies with California rules so the court’s order will be enforceable and less vulnerable to later challenge. Proper notice also creates the opportunity for parties to engage in dialogue or settlement, which can resolve disputes without a contested hearing. Anticipating objections and preparing responses helps reduce delays and supports a more efficient resolution process.
Once the petition and supporting documentation are prepared, we file the matter in the appropriate superior court and arrange service on all required parties. The filing includes the proposed order outlining the requested modification and legal arguments supporting the relief sought. After filing, the court sets deadlines for responses and schedules a hearing if objections are raised. We manage all procedural steps and communications so clients can focus on gathering any additional evidence or participating in settlement discussions as needed.
A clear proposed order and persuasive legal memorandum help the court understand the requested relief and its justification. We draft tailored orders that specify the modifications sought and provide precise instructions for trustees. The supporting brief explains relevant California case law and statutes, and ties the factual record to legal standards. Presenting a coherent package increases the chance of the court granting the requested relief and reduces ambiguity about how trustees should implement the changes.
When objections arise, we evaluate their merits and seek to resolve differences through negotiation or mediation when appropriate. Preparing responses to oppositions requires careful legal analysis and supplemental evidence. We aim to isolate genuine disputes from peripheral objections and to negotiate practical solutions that protect client interests. If settlement is not possible, we prepare for hearing by organizing witness testimony and documentary exhibits that demonstrate why the petition should be granted under the applicable legal standards.
At hearing, the court considers evidence, hears argument, and decides whether to approve the proposed modification. If the court issues an order, we assist clients with implementing the changes, updating asset titles, and providing beneficiaries with required notices and accountings. Post-order steps may include filing certified copies with financial institutions, retitling property, or adjusting trustee powers and administrative procedures. We remain available to help trustees follow the court’s instructions and to respond to any follow-up matters that arise during implementation.
A successful hearing often depends on well-prepared testimony and documentary exhibits that demonstrate the need for modification and the settlor’s probable intent. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and present a concise factual narrative to the court. The goal is to make the matter straightforward for judicial review so the judge can confidently grant an order that balances legal standards with practical outcomes. Clear presentation at hearing minimizes the risk of follow-up challenges and supports smooth administration after the order is entered.
After a modification order is entered, trustees must take steps to implement changes, which may include retitling assets, updating beneficiary designations, or revising administrative procedures. We help trustees prepare the necessary documentation, notify financial institutions, and file any required certificates or recordings to reflect new authority. Completing these tasks promptly and accurately ensures the court’s order has practical effect and reduces the likelihood of future disputes about trust administration or asset ownership.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that asks the superior court to change, reform, or clarify the terms or administration of a trust when direct amendment by the settlor is impossible or when legal clarification is needed. The petition explains the factual background, sets out the proposed changes, and requests a judicial order authorizing the trustee to act under the revised terms. Courts generally require evidence that the requested relief is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent and that proper notice has been provided to interested parties. People use petitions in situations such as correcting drafting errors, resolving ambiguous language, confirming that assets belong to the trust, or adapting trust provisions to changed family, financial, or legal circumstances. The process emphasizes preserving the settlor’s intent and protecting beneficiaries’ rights, and the court’s involvement provides a durable legal solution that trustees can rely on when administering trust assets and making distributions.
Determining whether a limited petition or a comprehensive modification is appropriate begins with a careful review of the trust document and the nature of the problem. A limited petition is often suitable when the issue is narrow, such as an ambiguous clause or the need to confirm ownership of particular assets. These narrower filings focus on resolving a specific defect without altering the broader trust structure, and they can be more cost-efficient and quicker to resolve. A comprehensive modification is warranted when multiple provisions are problematic, or when broader changes are needed to reflect substantial shifts in family dynamics, tax considerations, or the settlor’s probable intent. In such cases, a holistic petition allows the court to address interconnected issues in a single proceeding, reducing the risk of inconsistent rulings and providing a coherent framework for future administration of the trust.
In California, trustees, beneficiaries, or other interested parties who are affected by the trust’s administration may file a trust modification petition. Trustees often initiate petitions when they encounter administrative obstacles or interpretive issues that impede proper management. Beneficiaries may file petitions when they believe that changes are necessary to correct an error or to reflect the settlor’s probable intent. The court will evaluate standing and the substance of the request before granting relief. It is important to identify all interested parties and provide them with proper notice of the petition, because failure to follow notice requirements can affect the court’s ability to issue a binding order. Parties who are concerned about the petition’s impact can participate, object, or negotiate a settlement to resolve disputes prior to a contested hearing.
Helpful evidence for a petition includes the original trust instrument and any earlier drafts or amendments, deeds and financial account statements showing intended asset ownership, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s goals, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intentions. A clear documentary record helps the court understand why the requested change is consistent with the settlor’s likely objectives and why judicial intervention is necessary. Precise and organized exhibits make it easier to present a compelling factual narrative at hearing. In addition to documents, well-drafted declarations from trustees and knowledgeable witnesses are valuable because they explain the circumstances that led to the petition and provide context for the court. Detailed evidence that connects the proposed modification to the settlor’s probable intent increases the likelihood of judicial approval and reduces the risk of successful objections by other parties.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in California varies based on the complexity of the issues, the extent of notice and service required, whether objections are filed, and the court’s calendar. Simple, uncontested petitions that address narrow issues can be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested matters or comprehensive modifications that require extensive evidence and hearings can take several months or longer. Expect some variation depending on local superior court procedures in Sacramento County. Working proactively to gather evidence, provide proper notice, and engage in settlement discussions can shorten the process. Efficient case management and clear filings often reduce delays. Counsel can advise on realistic timelines based on the facts of the case and local court practices, and help prepare a plan to move the matter forward while addressing potential procedural hurdles.
Beneficiaries are generally entitled to notice of a trust modification petition because the court’s decision can directly affect their rights and interests in trust property. Whether they must participate depends on their preferences and whether they intend to oppose the requested relief. Many beneficiaries choose to engage in the process to protect their interests, while others may accept proposed changes or reach a settlement that resolves disputes without a contested hearing. Providing early notice and clear information to beneficiaries can encourage cooperation and potential settlement. When beneficiaries object, the court will consider their concerns, and hearings may be required. Counsel can help manage communications and settlement efforts to reduce adversarial conflict and focus on achievable solutions that preserve relationships and protect trust assets.
A petition can address a trustee’s removal or request changes in trustee powers if there is evidence of breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, misconduct, or a demonstrated inability to administer the trust effectively. Requests to remove or replace a trustee typically require showing that such action is necessary to protect trust assets or the beneficiaries’ interests. The court weighs the facts carefully before removing a trustee, balancing continuity of administration with the need to remedy improper conduct or significant inability to serve. If removal is sought, the petition should present clear factual support and propose a qualified successor trustee or outline a suitable plan for administration. When the concern is limited to trustee powers rather than removal, the petition can seek adjustments that better enable the trustee to manage assets and fulfill fiduciary duties in light of present circumstances, while preserving the trust’s general structure.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary depending on the scope of the petition, the need for documentary evidence, whether the matter is contested, and whether hearings or expert witnesses are required. Filing fees, court costs, and attorney fees all contribute to the overall expense. Limited petitions that are uncontested tend to be less costly, while comprehensive modifications or contested matters can involve greater time and resources to prepare evidence and respond to objections. Early assessment and budgeting help clients understand likely costs and consider options for reducing expenses, such as pursuing mediation or settlement, narrowing issues for litigation, or focusing on the most dispositive elements of a case. Discussing fee structures, anticipated steps, and cost-saving strategies with counsel can provide transparency and help clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition.
A Heggstad petition is focused on establishing that certain assets belong to a trust even though formal transfer into the trust did not occur before the settlor’s death. It addresses asset ownership and seeks court recognition that specific items should be administered under the trust. In contrast, a modification petition seeks to change, reform, or clarify the terms or administration of the trust itself. Both procedures involve court filings and notice to interested parties, but they address different legal questions—ownership recognition versus document alteration or interpretation. Heggstad petitions are often used to avoid probate for overlooked assets and to allow trustees to manage and distribute those assets under trust terms. When both ownership issues and substantive trust changes are present, separate or combined legal strategies may be needed, and counsel can advise on the most efficient approach to resolving both types of concerns in court.
If someone objects to a petition, the court will consider the objections and may schedule a hearing for the parties to present evidence and legal argument. Responding to objections involves assessing their legal basis, preparing rebuttal evidence, and exploring settlement options where feasible. Addressing objections promptly and thoroughly helps present a clear case to the court and may resolve disputes without prolonged litigation. Effective communication with objecting parties sometimes uncovers common ground and opportunities to negotiate agreeable terms. When objections cannot be resolved, counsel prepares to defend the petition at hearing by organizing testimony, exhibits, and legal authority that support the requested relief. The judge evaluates the record and decides whether the modification is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent and legal standards. Even after a contested hearing, there are post-judgment steps to implement the court’s order and mitigate any further disputes that arise during administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas