A trust modification petition can be a necessary step when life changes, tax laws, or unforeseen circumstances make the original trust terms impractical. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist residents of Rancho Cordova and the broader Sacramento County area with thoughtful guidance on how to pursue trust modifications under California law. Whether you are a trustee, beneficiary, or settlor seeking to amend trust provisions, the process requires careful review of trust documents, trustees duties, and applicable statutes to protect property interests and family relationships while minimizing disputes and delays.
Modifying a trust often involves balancing legal requirements with family dynamics and financial planning goals. Common reasons for seeking a modification include changes in health, remarriage, changes in beneficiary circumstances, or errors in the original document. The petition process may be initiated in probate court when parties cannot agree or when statutory grounds must be established. Our firm provides clear explanations of options such as consent-based amendments, court-approved modifications, and strategies for avoiding contentious litigation while maintaining the settlor’s intent to the extent possible under California law.
Pursuing a trust modification petition can preserve family harmony, protect assets, and ensure the trust reflects current circumstances and intentions. A well-handled petition clarifies ambiguous provisions, corrects mistakes, addresses changed tax or financial considerations, and reassigns trustee powers if needed. The court process also provides a formal resolution when parties disagree, reducing future litigation risk. By aligning the trust with present needs, a modification helps trustees carry out duties effectively and beneficiaries understand their rights, which can prevent confusion and disputes down the road and provide stability for estate administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides comprehensive estate planning and trust administration services to clients across California, including Rancho Cordova and Sacramento County. The firm focuses on clear communication and practical solutions when assisting with trust modification petitions and related matters. Clients receive careful document review, detailed explanations of legal options, and representation in court when needed. Our approach emphasizes protecting client interests through careful preparation, thorough factual development, and respectful negotiation with other parties to reach outcomes that reflect the settlor’s intent and the family’s current needs.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing used to request a change to the terms of a trust, either by court order or through an agreed amendment among interested parties. In California, petition grounds range from settlor consent to circumstances where modification is necessary to carry out the settlor’s intent. The process typically involves reviewing the trust instrument, notifying beneficiaries, and presenting legal and factual bases to the court. Whether the petition seeks clarification, correction, or substantive change, it must comply with statutory notice requirements and demonstrate why the requested modification is appropriate under governing law.
Not every desired change requires court action; some modifications can be achieved through agreement among affected parties or through provisions in the trust that allow amendments. When agreement cannot be reached, a petition becomes the route to secure a judicial determination. The court considers the settlor’s intent, the language of the trust, and whether the proposed change preserves the settlor’s overall plan. The process often includes mediation or negotiation to avoid contested hearings, and thorough preparation of evidence and legal argument improves the likelihood of a favorable resolution.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to alter the terms of an existing trust for reasons recognized by law. Common requests include correcting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language, updating distribution provisions, replacing or removing a trustee, or modifying tax planning provisions. The petition must set out the factual basis for the change and often requires notice to all interested parties. The goal is to ensure the trust functions as the settlor intended, or as current circumstances require, while protecting beneficiaries rights and the integrity of the trust document under California statutes.
The trust modification petition process involves several important steps, including a careful review of the trust instrument, identification of interested parties, preparation of the petition and supporting declarations, service of notice, and, if necessary, court hearings. Evidence supporting the requested change may include testimony, documentary proof, and legal argument about applicable statutes. Mediation or settlement discussions frequently occur to resolve disputes before trial. The court will weigh the settlor’s intent, potential harm to beneficiaries, and legal standards when determining whether to grant the requested modification.
Understanding the terminology used in trust modification cases helps clients follow the process and make informed decisions. Common terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, Heggstad petition, and certification of trust. Familiarity with these concepts clarifies the roles each party plays and the legal mechanisms available to adjust trust terms. Clear definitions also support communication during negotiations and court proceedings, reducing misinterpretation and facilitating smoother resolution of disputes when modification is necessary or when parties seek to implement agreed changes to the trust.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s initial intentions and the language used in the trust document are central to any modification petition because courts strive to honor those original purposes. When the settlor is alive and competent, they may be able to amend the trust directly if the trust allows. When the settlor is deceased or cannot act, interested parties may seek a court-ordered modification to address changes or ambiguities while attempting to preserve the settlor’s general objectives and distribution plan.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to find that certain assets are trust property even though title remains in the settlor’s name, typically used to transfer assets into the trust for estate administration. This petition can be relevant in trust modification contexts where ownership questions affect proposed changes. It assists the court in determining which assets are governed by the trust and which are subject to probate. Establishing trust property through a Heggstad petition can streamline administration and ensure modifications apply to the correct estate assets.
The trustee is the person or institution responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties including loyalty, prudence, and impartiality. When a trustee seeks or opposes a trust modification, the court evaluates whether the proposed change affects trustees duties or the ability to fulfill the settlor’s objectives. If a trustee is removed or replaced through a petition, the court will consider the need for continuity in trust administration and the protection of beneficiary interests.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets not already in the trust into the trust upon the settlor’s death. It functions as a safety net to catch assets omitted from funding during the settlor’s lifetime. In the context of trust modifications, a pour-over will may interact with proposed changes by determining how newly identified or reclassified assets are ultimately distributed. Courts consider the will and trust together when resolving petitions to ensure the settlor’s overall estate plan is honored.
When considering changes to a trust, there are multiple paths: informal amendments if the trust permits, agreement among interested parties, or a court petition when disagreements or statutory issues arise. Each option has trade-offs in terms of cost, timing, and the level of judicial oversight. Informal agreements can be quicker and less adversarial but require full cooperation. Court petitions create a formal record and binding resolution, which can be necessary when parties cannot agree or when legal grounds require judicial intervention. The right approach depends on the trust language and the parties involved.
If the settlor is alive and the trust contains provisions that allow amendment, a limited approach where the settlor directly amends the trust can often address changes quickly and with minimal conflict. Consent from all affected parties can also produce an agreed amendment that modifies distributions or trustee designations. This route avoids formal court proceedings, reduces costs, and preserves privacy. Parties should document any agreement carefully and update related documents to ensure consistency, and they should confirm that procedural requirements in the trust instrument are met to prevent future challenges.
When beneficiaries and trustees reach a consensus about needed changes, they may execute a written agreement to modify or interpret the trust if the trust and state law permit such an approach. Mutual agreement can be an effective way to resolve ambiguities or correct minor mistakes without involving the courts. It is important to ensure that all interested parties are identified and that any agreement is legally sound and documented to avoid later disputes. Professional review of the proposed language can help prevent unintended consequences and ensure the modification reflects everyone’s understanding.
A comprehensive legal approach is warranted when parties disagree over the meaning of trust provisions, when the settlor is deceased and conflicting interests arise, or when substantial assets or complex tax issues are involved. In these situations, a court petition provides a definitive resolution and a formal process for presenting evidence and arguments. Comprehensive representation prepares the case for court, manages discovery and witness preparation, and seeks a resolution that honors the settlor’s intent while protecting beneficiary rights and asset values over time.
When trust modifications involve significant financial restructuring, tax planning, or changes to retirement and insurance planning, the stakes can be high and the legal issues complex. A full service approach coordinates trust law with tax and estate planning considerations to avoid unintended tax consequences and to ensure that distributions and trustee powers align with long-term goals. Court involvement may be required to effect changes that affect beneficiaries rights or that cannot be resolved by agreement, making thorough legal preparation and strategic planning essential.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification provides careful legal analysis, protected procedures, and a formal record of changes, reducing the risk of future challenges. It ensures that modifications are legally enforceable and that notice and procedural requirements are satisfied. This approach also allows for coordination with tax, financial, and guardianship planning if issues such as special needs trusts or retirement plan trusts are affected. By addressing all related concerns, a comprehensive process can preserve the settlor’s goals and provide clarity for trustees and beneficiaries.
Comprehensive handling also includes proactive conflict management and negotiation techniques designed to minimize adversarial proceedings. When litigation is necessary, detailed preparation improves the presentation of facts and legal arguments, which can result in favorable court outcomes and less disruption to estate administration. Comprehensive services typically include drafting court-ready documents, managing communications among parties, and recommending practical post-modification steps to update related documents such as pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and guardian nominations to reflect the updated plan.
A comprehensive approach aims to create a clear and enforceable record of changes that stands up to scrutiny and reduces the potential for future contests. By ensuring that notice requirements are met and the court’s order, when obtained, is properly drafted, parties gain confidence in the enforceability of the modification. This reduces the likelihood of subsequent litigation, protects asset values from protracted disputes, and helps trustees carry out their duties with a clearer mandate and less risk of claims from beneficiaries.
When modifying a trust, it is important to update related estate planning documents to maintain consistency across the entire plan. A thorough process includes reviewing pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and any trust-related certifications. Coordinating changes prevents gaps where assets could unintentionally avoid trust provisions or create conflicts between documents. Attention to these details preserves the settlor’s overall plan and helps beneficiaries and trustees understand how the modification affects administration, distributions, and long-term financial arrangements.
Begin by gathering all trust-related documents, including the original trust, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, and previous court orders. A thorough review will reveal whether the trust permits amendment, whether the settlor retained powers, and which beneficiaries must be notified. Clear documentation helps identify potential issues early, such as ambiguous language or unfunded assets. This foundation supports productive discussions with other parties and provides the factual basis needed for a well-supported petition if the matter proceeds to court, improving efficiency and reducing surprises.
Mediation offers a structured setting to address disagreements and explore mutually acceptable resolutions without the expense and formality of a contested hearing. A neutral mediator can help parties identify common ground and craft tailored solutions that reflect the settlor’s intentions and beneficiaries’ needs. Mediation can preserve relationships, shorten timelines, and produce enforceable agreements that the court can adopt if necessary. Preparing thoroughly for mediation, including gathering documents and clarifying priorities, increases the chance of a durable outcome.
Life events such as divorce, remarriage, birth of grandchildren, or changes in financial status may make the original trust provisions outdated or impractical. Trust modification helps align the estate plan with current family realities and financial goals. Changes may also be needed to correct drafting mistakes, respond to tax law developments, or update trustee appointments. Seeking a petition can clarify ownership of assets, improve administration, and ensure distributions occur as intended, providing peace of mind that the settlor’s plan remains effective and appropriate for beneficiaries.
Other reasons to pursue a modification include addressing beneficiary incapacity, adding provisions for special needs trusts or pet trusts, and updating healthcare or guardianship nominations associated with estate planning. In some cases, property thought to be in the trust is discovered to be titled differently, requiring court action such as a Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership. Prompt attention to these issues minimizes administrative delays, reduces the potential for costly disputes, and helps trustees carry out their duties without uncertainty about the trust’s scope and direction.
Common circumstances prompting a petition include ambiguous or outdated trust provisions, disputes over trustee conduct or beneficiary entitlements, newly discovered assets, and mistakes in funding the trust. Other triggers include tax planning changes, the need to create or modify special needs or irrevocable life insurance trusts, or changes in family structure such as divorce or remarriage. Recognizing these situations early and addressing them through either agreement or court petition helps protect assets and clarify responsibilities for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Drafting errors or vague language in a trust can create uncertainty about the settlor’s intentions, prompting beneficiaries or trustees to seek clarification through a petition. These errors can affect distributions, trustee powers, or asset classification. Filing a petition to interpret or reform the trust provides a judicial determination that resolves ambiguity, helping trustees perform their duties confidently. A careful review and documentation of the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances support the petition and reduce the chance of prolonged disputes among interested parties.
Life changes such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or significant changes in financial condition frequently necessitate a reassessment of trust provisions. Modifications can accommodate new beneficiaries, alter distribution timing, or reallocate assets to address evolving needs. When parties cannot agree or when the settlor cannot act, a petition to the probate court may be needed to implement appropriate changes. Addressing these matters promptly ensures the trust continues to serve its intended purpose under current circumstances.
Disagreements regarding trustee performance, potential breaches of fiduciary duty, or disputes about whether certain assets belong to the trust sometimes require judicial intervention. A trust modification petition or related petitions, such as a Heggstad petition, can resolve ownership and administration questions. The court can also modify trustee powers or replace a trustee when necessary to protect beneficiary interests. These proceedings clarify responsibilities and help ensure proper management of trust assets moving forward.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Rancho Cordova and across Sacramento County with tailored support for trust modifications and related estate planning matters. We assist with document review, petitions, notices to interested parties, and representation in court when needed. Our goal is to provide straightforward guidance that helps clients understand legal options and likely outcomes. By focusing on practical solutions and clear communication, we help families navigate the process of updating trusts while protecting assets and relationships.
Choosing legal representation can improve the efficiency and clarity of the trust modification process. The firm offers focused attention to the facts, careful preparation of petitions and supporting evidence, and consistent communication with clients about strategy and next steps. Attention to procedural requirements and proper notice helps reduce the risk of procedural defects that could delay resolution. Clients receive practical advice on settlement options and court strategies tailored to their priorities and the specific trust provisions at issue.
Our approach includes coordination with financial and tax advisors when modifications intersect with retirement plans, insurance trusts, or tax planning instruments. This integrated perspective helps identify potential unintended consequences and craft solutions that align with broader estate planning goals. We prioritize preserving family relationships where possible by facilitating negotiation and mediation, while also being prepared to pursue necessary court relief to protect client rights and assets when informal resolution is not feasible.
We strive to make the process understandable and manageable, providing step-by-step updates and practical recommendations on documentation, notice, and evidence gathering. From preparing a certification of trust to addressing funding issues or pursuing a Heggstad petition when assets are mis-titled, the firm assists clients through each stage. Our goal is to help clients secure a legally sound and durable result that reflects current needs and the settlor’s underlying intentions.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to identify the trust provisions at issue and any related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, advance health care directives, and powers of attorney. We then counsel clients on options, including negotiated amendments, mediation, or filing a petition in probate court. When a petition is necessary, we prepare the required pleadings, declarations, and notices, manage service on interested parties, and pursue resolution through negotiation or court hearings depending on what best serves the client’s needs.
The first step is an in-depth review of the trust and related documents, along with a discussion of the client’s objectives and relevant background facts. We identify which parties must be notified and whether the trust contains amendment provisions. This planning stage also evaluates whether a nonjudicial amendment or a petition is appropriate, and it sets the strategy for communication and evidence gathering. Clear planning reduces surprises and sets expectations for timeline and potential outcomes.
Collecting all relevant documents, including prior amendments, deeds, beneficiary designations, and related estate planning materials, helps determine the trust’s current scope and identify any unfunded assets. We analyze the trust language to spot ambiguities or provisions that could affect the requested modification. This detailed review supports the development of persuasive factual and legal arguments and helps anticipate potential objections from other parties, allowing for preemptive solutions to reduce disputes.
A crucial early task is identifying all interested parties, including current and remainder beneficiaries, trustees, and any parties with potential claims against the trust. California law requires proper notice to these persons for court petitions. We prepare and coordinate service of required notices, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and reducing procedural risks. Accurate identification and timely notification are essential to moving a petition forward without unnecessary delay.
If agreement cannot be reached, we prepare and file the trust modification petition with the probate court, along with supporting declarations and proposed orders. Discovery may follow, during which parties exchange relevant documents and information. We manage discovery requests, subpoenas, and depositions as needed to develop the factual record. Thorough preparation at this stage strengthens the petition and positions the client to negotiate from a well-supported factual and legal footing or to present a persuasive case at hearing.
Drafting pleadings involves clearly stating the grounds for modification, presenting supporting facts, and attaching documentary evidence. Declarations from parties and witnesses help establish the settlor’s intent and circumstances supporting the requested change. Careful attention to legal standards and evidentiary rules improves the probability of success. We focus on creating a concise, well-supported petition that explains why the modification is needed and how it aligns with the settlor’s overall plan.
Discovery helps uncover facts that support or oppose the modification and can lead to settlement as parties see the strength of each position. We handle written discovery, document production, and witness preparation. Throughout discovery, we pursue negotiation and mediation where appropriate to reach an agreed resolution. If settlement is not possible, the developed record will support briefing and hearing preparation to present the strongest possible case to the court.
If parties cannot resolve the matter, the court will hold a hearing to decide the petition. We prepare oral argument, present evidence, and address any objections raised by other parties. Once the court issues an order, we assist in implementing modifications by updating trust documents, recording changes with relevant institutions, and coordinating with financial advisors. We also advise trustees and beneficiaries on the practical steps needed to carry out the court’s order and ensure consistent administration going forward.
Preparing for a hearing includes organizing documentary evidence, preparing witness testimony, and crafting persuasive legal arguments tied to the settlor’s intent and governing statutes. We anticipate opposing arguments and prepare responses to procedural or substantive challenges that may arise. Effective presentation at the hearing increases the likelihood of obtaining an order that accurately reflects the requested changes and offers clear directions for trust administration.
After a court order, it is important to implement the changes across all affected documents and accounts. This may include updating titles, filing a certification of trust with financial institutions, revising beneficiary designations, and coordinating with retirement plan administrators. We help clients complete these administrative tasks, ensuring the trust functions as modified and that trustees and beneficiaries understand their roles and obligations under the new terms.
California courts may modify a trust for several reasons, including when the settlor’s intent can be better effectuated through revision, when a provision is ambiguous or impossible to administer as written, or when unanticipated circumstances make the original terms impracticable. The court may also reform a trust to correct mistakes in the document where clear and convincing evidence shows the settlor’s actual intent. When the settlor is alive and consents, modification may occur without court involvement if the trust permits amendments, but judicial action is available when there is disagreement or legal uncertainty. Before filing, it is important to evaluate the particular statutory standards and case law that apply to the requested change. The petition must present factual support and legal justification for the modification and provide notice to interested parties. Courts aim to honor the settlor’s intent to the greatest extent possible, especially when the evidence demonstrates what the settlor intended, while also balancing beneficiaries rights and statutory safeguards designed to prevent fraud or undue influence.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with complexity, the level of disagreement among parties, and court calendars. A straightforward petition where parties largely agree can be resolved in a matter of months, particularly if the court can schedule a hearing quickly and there are no extensive discovery disputes. More contentious matters that require discovery, multiple motions, or contested hearings may take significantly longer, sometimes extending into a year or more depending on the scope of issues and court availability. Early communication and thorough preparation can shorten the process. Timely identification and service of interested parties, focused discovery, and attempts at mediation or settlement often reduce delays. However, parties should plan for potential delays due to procedural requirements, discovery disputes, or the court’s docket, and maintain realistic expectations about the time needed to obtain a durable court order when agreement is not possible.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed modification, and their objections become part of the court record if a petition is filed. Interested parties have a statutory right to receive notice of the petition and may file responses or objections outlining their positions. The court will consider objections when determining whether to grant the requested modification, evaluating the settlor’s intent, the benefits and harms of the change, and whether the modification is consistent with governing law and equitable principles. Objections do not necessarily prevent modification, but they can complicate and lengthen the process by triggering discovery, evidentiary disputes, or hearings. In many cases, parties are encouraged to consider mediation or negotiation to resolve objections before a contested hearing, which can save time and expense and sometimes preserve relationships among family members while still reaching a workable resolution.
A Heggstad petition is filed to establish that assets held in the settlor’s name at death are trust property and therefore should be governed by the trust rather than by probate. It typically arises when assets were intended to be transferred to the trust but remain titled in the settlor’s name due to oversight or administrative error. The petition asks the court to recognize trust ownership based on evidence showing the settlor’s intent to transfer those assets into the trust, simplifying administration and aligning property title with the estate plan. This petition can be important in the context of trust modification where asset classification affects distribution or the implementation of proposed changes. Establishing that certain assets belong to the trust using a Heggstad petition ensures that any modification or court order applies to the correct property, helping to prevent disputes about asset ownership during trust administration.
Yes, proper notice to interested parties is generally required when filing a trust modification petition in California. Interested parties typically include trustees, current and remainder beneficiaries, and possibly creditors or other persons with an interest in the trust. The notice must comply with statutory timing and service requirements to ensure that parties have an opportunity to review the petition and respond. Failure to provide proper notice can result in delays or the court declining to consider the petition until notice defects are corrected. Providing notice early and following statutory procedures reduces procedural risks and helps protect the finality of any resulting order. It also enables parties to raise objections or participate in settlement discussions, which can lead to agreement and avoid a contested hearing. Working with counsel to identify all interested parties and serve notices correctly is a vital part of the petition process.
A trustee can be removed or replaced as part of trust-related court proceedings if there are valid grounds, such as breach of fiduciary duties, incapacity, or other serious concerns affecting administration. A petition to remove a trustee must present evidence supporting the requested action and explain why removal serves the beneficiaries best interests. The court will consider whether removal is necessary and whether a replacement trustee is available to ensure continued prudent administration of trust assets. Removal proceedings are fact-sensitive and may be combined with modification petitions when trustee conduct or capacity affects implementation of the trust. Courts prefer solutions that promote continuity and protect assets, so petitions should propose clear transitions and demonstrate that removal will not unjustly disrupt administration. Proper documentation and careful presentation of the facts strengthen the case for judicial intervention when warranted.
Tax implications can arise when modifying trusts, particularly when changes involve distributions, restructuring of assets, or transfers that affect income or estate tax planning. It is important to evaluate potential tax consequences before implementing modifications to avoid unintended liabilities. Coordination with tax or financial advisors can help identify strategies to minimize adverse outcomes, such as unintended recognition events or changes in tax treatment of certain assets like retirement accounts or irrevocable trusts. When a trust modification involves tax-sensitive matters, the legal strategy should incorporate tax planning considerations and may require specialized filings or timing adjustments. Courts also consider tax consequences when approving certain modifications, so presenting a plan that accounts for tax effects and demonstrates careful planning can be beneficial to obtaining the court’s approval and protecting beneficiaries interests from unexpected tax burdens.
Modifying a trust does not automatically change beneficiary designations on retirement accounts or life insurance policies because these accounts are governed by contract and beneficiary designations that operate independently of the trust. If a settlor intended such assets to be governed by the trust, it is important to confirm that beneficiary designations and account titles align with the trust document. Failure to update beneficiary designations can result in assets passing outside the trust despite modifications to the trust instrument. When trust changes are implemented, it is prudent to review and, if necessary, update beneficiary designations and account titling to ensure they reflect the revised plan. Coordination with financial institutions, retirement plan administrators, and insurance carriers is often required to implement these updates. Doing so helps ensure that the overall estate plan functions as intended after the trust modification is complete.
Alternatives to filing a court petition include negotiated amendments, settlor-initiated amendments when the trust permits, and mediation between disputing parties. Negotiated solutions can be faster, less costly, and less adversarial, and they preserve privacy by avoiding public court records. When the settlor is able to act, direct amendment often provides the simplest path to change. Mediation can help parties find mutually acceptable solutions and finalize agreements that can be incorporated into the trust or submitted to the court for approval if desired. However, when parties cannot reach agreement, when statutory grounds require judicial oversight, or when asset ownership is disputed, a court petition may be the only viable route to obtain a binding resolution. Evaluating the relative costs and likely outcomes of negotiation versus litigation is an important part of case planning, and experienced counsel can help identify the most appropriate path given the facts and client goals.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary based on complexity, the degree of disagreement among parties, and court-related expenses. Simple matters resolved by agreement generally incur lower costs related to document drafting and legal counseling. Contested petitions that require discovery, multiple hearings, or extended litigation will be more expensive due to increased attorney time, court fees, and potential expert involvement. Each case is different, and providing a realistic estimate requires understanding the specific facts and the scope of required legal work. We discuss likely costs during the initial consultation and provide guidance on ways to control expenses, such as pursuing mediation or narrowing disputed issues. Transparent communication about billing practices and anticipated steps helps clients plan financially and choose strategies that balance cost with the need for a durable legal result. In many cases, early planning and negotiation reduce overall costs compared with prolonged litigation.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas