A trust modification petition can be an important step when life events, changes in family dynamics, or mistakes in drafting require an update to a trust document. For residents of Rancho Murieta and surrounding parts of Sacramento County, understanding when and how to pursue a trust modification helps preserve asset distribution intentions and protect beneficiaries. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides clear guidance on the petition process, helping clients assess whether a court petition is the right path and outlining realistic expectations for timing, documentation, and potential outcomes in California probate courts.
Bringing a trust modification petition involves legal procedures that ask the court to permit changes to the terms of an existing trust. This can occur for many reasons, including changed circumstances, ambiguous language, or to correct issues that prevent the trust from operating as intended. Our Rancho Murieta practice explains available options such as consenting trustee and beneficiary amendments, nonjudicial settlement agreements, or formal petitions filed in probate court. We emphasize practical planning, clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and tailored strategies that align with California law and your family’s needs.
A trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s intent when the original trust no longer reflects current circumstances. It can prevent disputes among beneficiaries, reduce the risk of unintended distributions, and clarify trustee powers and duties. Pursuing a petition also helps address issues like obsolete provisions, tax planning adjustments, and changes in beneficiary needs, including incapacity or disability planning. With careful documentation and court approval where required, a modification ensures the trust functions smoothly and protects family assets while maintaining continuity of management according to the settlor’s revised wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves Rancho Murieta and clients across Sacramento County, focusing on estate planning matters including trust modifications. Our firm emphasizes clear communication, careful review of trust documents, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances. We work closely with trustees and beneficiaries to assess legal options, prepare necessary petitions, and guide clients through court procedures when formal approval is required. Our approach balances legal precision with compassionate client service to protect assets and preserve family relationships during potentially sensitive transitions.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court to alter the terms of a trust when the parties cannot make the change through informal agreement or when the trust’s provisions prevent a nonjudicial amendment. In California, petitions often address issues such as ambiguous language, changed circumstances, or provisions that impede administration. The court evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent, safeguards beneficiaries, and complies with statutory requirements. Knowing the legal standards, potential objections, and evidentiary needs helps set realistic expectations for timing and outcomes.
Before filing a petition, parties typically explore alternatives like obtaining unanimous beneficiary consent, creating a nonjudicial settlement agreement, or using trustee powers if available. When these routes are unavailable or disputed, a court petition can resolve contested issues while providing legal authority for the requested change. The petition process involves pleadings, possible temporary orders, and hearings where evidence and testimony may be presented. Preparing a persuasive petition requires careful factual development, supporting documentation, and clear linkage between the requested relief and the settlor’s likely intentions.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to authorize changes to a trust that cannot be made by the parties alone. Common reasons include addressing drafting errors, adapting to changed financial or family circumstances, clarifying ambiguous terms, or implementing court-ordered relief when beneficiaries cannot agree. The court’s role is to evaluate whether the modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and is legally permissible. Understanding the distinction between nonjudicial amendments and court petitions helps clients select the most efficient and effective path under California law.
A successful petition must clearly identify the trust, the parties, and the proposed amendment, and must present facts supporting the need for modification. Common elements include declarations or affidavits describing changed circumstances, documentary evidence such as the original trust instrument, and statements about beneficiary positions. The process typically involves filing the petition, providing notice to interested parties, responding to objections, and attending a hearing. Careful drafting, attention to procedural deadlines, and thoughtful evidence gathering increase the chances that the court will grant appropriate relief.
Understanding common legal terms can demystify the petition process. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, Heggstad petition, and nonjudicial settlement agreement appear frequently in trust modification matters. Familiarity with these concepts helps clients follow conversations about remedies and procedural options and allows them to participate in meaningful decision making. Reviewing definitions and how they apply to your situation supports informed choices and more efficient resolution of disputes or drafting issues when pursuing modifications in California probate court.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and whose intent shapes the trust’s terms and purpose. In trust modification matters, courts focus on interpreting and honoring the settlor’s probable intent, relying on the trust instrument and supporting evidence. When the settlor’s circumstances have changed or the original language is unclear, parties may seek a modification petition to align administration with what the settlor likely intended. Establishing intent through documents, declarations, and historical context is a central part of many petitions.
A Heggstad petition seeks a court order that transfers property into an existing trust even though title to that property was not formally re-titled before the settlor’s death. Named after a California case, these petitions show that the decedent intended the property to be trust property and request court recognition of that intent. This procedure can avoid probate for assets meant to be included in a trust and requires evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent and contemporaneous actions consistent with trust ownership.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust terms for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties including prudence, loyalty, and impartiality. When a trust needs modification, the trustee may be a party to the petition or may need to follow court orders to implement changes. Clear documentation of trustee actions and decisions is often important evidence in a modification proceeding.
A nonjudicial settlement agreement is a written agreement among interested parties resolving trust issues without court intervention. When beneficiaries and trustees can agree on modifications, this approach can be faster and less costly than filing a petition. The agreement typically addresses disputed terms, distribution plans, or administrative powers, and it may later be submitted to a court for confirmation if desired. This method emphasizes collaboration and preserves privacy by avoiding public court records.
When a trust requires changes, parties can often choose between informal approaches and formal court petitions. Informal options include beneficiary consent, trustee-initiated amendments permitted by trust language, or nonjudicial settlement agreements that avoid litigation. Formal petitions are used when parties disagree, when legal authority is unclear, or when substantial factual disputes require judicial resolution. Each option has trade-offs in cost, timing, confidentiality, and finality. Evaluating these trade-offs in light of the trust instrument, relationships among parties, and the nature of the requested change helps determine the best path forward.
When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree on a proposed modification, a nonjudicial settlement agreement or an amended trust executed under existing amendment powers can often achieve the desired result without court intervention. This approach saves time, reduces costs, and preserves family privacy by keeping matters out of the public record. It is important to document consent carefully and to ensure that the change is permitted under the trust terms and California law to avoid later challenges or unintended consequences for the trust’s administration and tax position.
For minor issues such as typographical errors, ambiguous language, or administrative clarifications, a trustee or beneficiaries may effect a nonjudicial resolution if the trust permits. These limited amendments can streamline trust administration and eliminate confusion without involving the court. Properly recording the change and ensuring all relevant parties receive notice reduces the risk of future disputes. However, when there are competing beneficiary interests or the amendment could affect substantive distribution rights, court involvement may become necessary to secure enforceable authority.
When beneficiaries disagree about the meaning of trust terms, distribution plans, or the need for changes, a formal petition can provide a definitive judicial resolution. Court proceedings allow presentation of evidence and legal argument to clarify intent or to authorize modifications that reconcile competing claims. Engaging comprehensive legal guidance helps ensure procedural requirements are met, proper notice is given to all interested parties, and that a persuasive record is developed to support the requested relief in probate court.
Some trust modifications implicate complicated legal or tax issues, such as changes affecting generation-skipping transfer considerations, retirement plan designations, or irrevocable trust provisions. In those situations, a court petition can create certainty and formal authority for changes that have significant fiscal consequences. Careful legal analysis and coordination with financial advisors help protect tax positions and ensure that any court-ordered modifications do not inadvertently create adverse results for beneficiaries or the trust’s long-term goals.
A comprehensive approach combines careful review of the trust instrument, factual investigation, strategic negotiation, and, when needed, litigation readiness. This method reduces the likelihood of future challenges by building a strong factual record and securing clear court orders when appropriate. It also helps align the trust with current circumstances, protects vulnerable beneficiaries, and addresses tax or administrative implications. Taking a broad view of the trust and related documents ensures that amendments or petitions produce durable, enforceable results that reflect the settlor’s intent and family needs.
Comprehensive handling of trust modifications includes coordinating with financial and tax advisors, preparing thorough evidentiary support, and crafting solutions that promote long-term clarity. This holistic perspective minimizes the risk of litigation down the road and can result in more efficient administration after changes are implemented. Whether the matter is resolved through agreement or requires judicial action, a full-service approach helps clients navigate complex statutory rules and procedural requirements while preserving family relationships and protecting the integrity of the trust estate.
Seeking court approval for contested or significant modifications provides formal legal authority and reduces the risk of subsequent disputes. A court order confirming a change creates a clear, enforceable record that trustees can rely on when administering assets. This legal finality brings stability to beneficiaries and trustees by minimizing ambiguity about distribution instructions and trustee powers. Formal proceedings also allow for thorough review of evidence, which strengthens the defensibility of the modification and helps prevent future litigation over the same issues.
A comprehensive review can identify and address risks facing vulnerable beneficiaries, such as minors or individuals with special needs, by ensuring that modifications include protective provisions and compatible planning tools. When changes affect asset management, creditor protection, or eligibility for public benefits, careful drafting and court approval help safeguard the intended outcomes. This thorough approach also supports trustees in making prudent distribution decisions and provides beneficiaries with reassurance that their interests are being handled responsibly and transparently.
Collecting all relevant documents before filing a petition can streamline the process and strengthen your position. Important items include the original trust instrument, any amendments, related wills like pour-over wills, trustee accountings, correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intent, and financial records for disputed assets. Documentation that shows how the settlor managed assets and expressed preferences can be especially important in contested matters. Early organization helps identify potential issues, accelerates evidence collection, and reduces surprises during court proceedings.
Before implementing substantive changes to a trust, consider possible tax impacts and effects on public benefits for beneficiaries who rely on government programs. Modifications affecting retirement accounts, generation-skipping transfer planning, or irrevocable trust structures may have significant financial consequences. Coordinating with tax advisors or financial planners helps ensure that a proposed modification achieves desired objectives without unintended liabilities. Thoughtful planning can preserve assets, reduce administrative complications, and protect beneficiaries’ eligibility for important benefits.
You should consider a trust modification petition when the trust no longer reflects the settlor’s needs, when the trust instrument contains drafting errors or ambiguous language, or when disagreements among trustees and beneficiaries prevent nonjudicial resolution. Also, changes in family circumstances such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or evolving beneficiary needs can make amendments necessary to fulfill the settlor’s intent. Consulting with legal counsel helps determine whether a petition, an agreed amendment, or another tool best addresses the specific facts and available remedies.
Other reasons to pursue a petition include situations where property was not properly transferred into trust, requiring a Heggstad petition; when retiring trustees need clear authority for distribution decisions; or when tax planning changes necessitate modifications to trust terms. Filing a petition can resolve disputed title issues and formalize changes that trustees require to administer assets correctly. In each case, weighing the costs, timing, and privacy implications helps families choose the most effective path to protect assets and honor the settlor’s wishes.
Typical circumstances prompting a petition include ambiguous or conflicting provisions, failure to retitle assets, beneficiary disputes, or changed family needs such as the need for a special needs trust or a pet trust. Other triggers are mistakes in trust drafting, tax law changes that affect trust design, or the settlor’s changed intentions. Recognizing these common scenarios early allows families to take proactive steps, gather necessary documentation, and evaluate whether a negotiated solution or court petition best resolves the issue efficiently and with minimal conflict.
When trust language is ambiguous or contains conflicting clauses, trustees and beneficiaries may disagree on how to distribute assets or exercise trustee powers. Ambiguities can arise from outdated references, imprecise terms, or inconsistent amendments. A petition asking the court to interpret the trust can provide authoritative guidance and prevent future disputes. Preparing a clear factual record about the settlor’s intentions and historical context strengthens a request for judicial interpretation and helps produce a durable resolution that trustees can follow.
Assets that were meant to be included in a trust but were never re-titled or transferred create practical and legal issues for trustees and beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition or other probate filing may be necessary to have the court recognize those assets as trust property. Successful petitions rely on evidence of the settlor’s intent and consistent actions reflecting ownership by the trust. Resolving these transfer issues avoids unnecessary probate and clarifies the estate plan, making administration smoother for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Life events such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or significant changes in assets may render original trust terms inappropriate. Changes in beneficiary needs, the settlor’s financial situation, or estate tax considerations can all necessitate amendments. When parties cannot agree on how to adapt the trust, a petition provides a formal process for the court to consider the facts and authorize a modification that aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and current family realities while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers local, informed guidance for Rancho Murieta residents dealing with trust modification matters. We assist in evaluating whether a nonjudicial agreement will suffice or whether a formal petition is necessary, and we guide clients through documentation, notice, and court procedures when required. Our goal is to provide practical solutions that address family needs while protecting assets and honoring the settlor’s intentions. Residents can expect clear communication, timely responses, and a focus on resolving disputes efficiently and respectfully.
Clients come to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for thorough analysis of trust documents and thoughtful planning tailored to each family’s circumstances. We take time to understand the history of the trust, the settlor’s likely intentions, and the current needs of beneficiaries. That careful review helps determine whether an informal amendment, a nonjudicial settlement agreement, or a court petition best serves the client. Our focus on clear communication and practical solutions guides clients through difficult decisions with measured legal advice.
When court intervention is required, we prepare detailed petitions, assemble supporting evidence, and manage procedural requirements so clients can focus on family matters rather than court logistics. We advise on notice requirements, potential objections, and settlement opportunities to achieve efficient resolutions. Our approach is to minimize conflict where possible, protect client interests, and pursue authoritative outcomes when necessary. We also coordinate with financial professionals to address tax or administrative implications of proposed changes.
We serve clients across Sacramento County, including Rancho Murieta, and emphasize client education so you understand risks, options, and likely timelines. Whether your matter is straightforward or contested, we provide realistic assessments and a clear plan for moving forward. Contact the firm to discuss your trust documents, gather relevant records, and explore the best path for achieving legally effective modifications that preserve family relationships and protect assets.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust instruments and related documents, followed by fact gathering to understand the reasons for modification. We evaluate nonjudicial alternatives and discuss likely outcomes, costs, and timelines. If a petition is necessary, we prepare pleadings, provide required notices to interested parties, and develop evidentiary support. Throughout the process we communicate regularly, identify settlement opportunities, and represent clients at hearings to seek durable court orders that align with the settlor’s intent and California probate law.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust document and any related estate planning instruments such as wills, powers of attorney, and certifications of trust. We assess the trust’s amendment provisions, the identities of trustees and beneficiaries, and any prior communications that indicate the settlor’s intent. This review informs whether a nonjudicial solution is possible or whether a petition is required. Establishing a clear strategy early helps streamline evidence collection and sets realistic expectations for timing and costs.
We gather and analyze all relevant documents, including the original trust, any amendments, related wills like pour-over wills, financial account statements, transfer records, and correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intentions. Gathering detailed evidence early is critical for petitions such as Heggstad filings or contested modification requests. The depth and organization of supporting documentation often determine the strength of your petition and can reduce litigation time by clarifying facts and narrowing disputed issues for the court to decide.
We conduct detailed interviews with clients, trustees, and, when appropriate, beneficiaries to develop a factual narrative explaining why modification is necessary. These conversations identify witnesses, uncover documents, and clarify events or statements that reflect the settlor’s objectives. Developing a coherent factual foundation is essential for persuading a court that a proposed change is consistent with the settlor’s intent and for anticipating likely objections from interested parties. Thorough factual preparation improves prospects for a favorable resolution.
If a petition is the appropriate path, we prepare and file the necessary pleadings in probate court and ensure that all required parties receive proper notice. Timely and accurate notice is legally required and helps avoid procedural challenges that could delay resolution. We coordinate service of process, prepare declarations and supporting exhibits, and identify any interim relief that may be necessary to protect assets or preserve status quo while the court considers the petition. Clear, procedural compliance strengthens the case and supports efficient resolution.
Our filings include a well-drafted petition, declarations from witnesses and interested parties, documentary exhibits, and proposed orders tailored to the relief sought. Exhibits commonly include the trust instrument, relevant account statements, title documents, and communications showing the settlor’s intent. A thorough evidentiary presentation helps the court evaluate the merits and reduces the likelihood of contested evidentiary battles at hearing. Attention to these details also prepares the matter for potential settlement discussions.
Proper notice is essential to a valid petition. We identify all interested parties, including beneficiaries and known creditors, and arrange for service in accordance with California probate rules. This process can involve personal service, substituted service, or publication in limited circumstances when parties are difficult to locate. Accurate notice prevents delays and reduces the risk of objections based on procedural grounds. We track deadlines and filings closely to maintain procedural compliance throughout the court process.
After filing, the matter may proceed through hearings, settlement discussions, or a combination of both. We represent clients at hearings by presenting declarations and oral argument, responding to objections, and proposing practical remedies. Where possible, we explore negotiated settlements to resolve disputes without protracted litigation. If the court grants the petition, we prepare and submit finalized orders and assist with the practical implementation of modifications, including updating trust administration and recording any necessary title changes to trust assets.
At hearings, the court considers the petition, supporting evidence, and any objections. We present a clear factual narrative, submit documentary exhibits, and, when needed, prepare witnesses to testify. The goal is to demonstrate that the proposed modification advances the settlor’s probable intent and is consistent with trust law. Effective presentation at hearing helps the court reach a reasoned decision and reduces ambiguity about how trustees should proceed following any court order.
If the court approves a modification, we assist with implementing the order by preparing amended trust documents, coordinating asset transfers, and advising trustees on updated duties. We also ensure that any required filings, such as title transfers or accountings, are completed to reflect the court-ordered changes. Post-order follow-up reduces the risk of post-judgment disputes and helps trustees administer the trust consistently with the court’s directives and the settlor’s revised intentions.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change the terms of an existing trust when parties cannot make the change through agreement or when the trust language prevents nonjudicial amendment. Typical reasons include correcting drafting mistakes, addressing changed family circumstances, or resolving disputes over interpretation. The court evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and whether the requested relief is legally appropriate under California trust and probate rules. Filing a petition becomes necessary when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about a change, when property was not properly transferred into the trust, or when the trust contains provisions that preclude informal amendment. The petition process includes preparing supporting declarations and exhibits, providing notice to interested parties, and attending hearings where the court will review the factual record and make a determination. Good documentation and clear factual presentation are critical to success.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on case complexity, court schedules, and whether the matter is contested. Simple petitions with cooperative parties and clear evidence can sometimes be resolved in a few months, while contested matters that require discovery, witness testimony, or multiple hearings may take longer. Scheduling depends on the local probate court calendar and the need for interim relief in urgent situations that affect asset protection or beneficiary welfare. Planning for potential delays and preparing thorough documentation can shorten the overall process. Regular communication with the court and opposing parties, exploring settlement options, and focusing on the most relevant disputed issues also help manage timelines. An early strategy that anticipates objections and clearly presents the settlor’s intent typically leads to more efficient resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries and trustees can sometimes make changes without going to court if the trust permits amendments by the trustee or if all interested parties consent. Nonjudicial settlement agreements provide a pathway to resolve many disputes and implement amendments while keeping matters private and avoiding the expense of litigation. When unanimous written consent is obtained and the changes do not violate statutory restrictions or creditor rights, this approach often offers a faster and less adversarial outcome. However, when parties cannot agree, when beneficiaries’ rights are affected and objections exist, or when statutory authority is lacking, a court petition is necessary to obtain enforceable changes. In those circumstances, the court provides finality and public record of the modification, which can be essential to reassure trustees and prevent future disputes about the trust’s administration.
A Heggstad petition requires evidence showing that an asset was intended to be part of the trust although title was not formally transferred. Helpful evidence includes contemporaneous documents, such as trust schedules, beneficiary lists, draft trust copies, declarations describing the settlor’s intent, property transfer paperwork, and communications showing that the settlor treated the asset as trust property. The court looks for a clear factual record that links the asset to the settlor’s trust planning and management actions. Witness declarations from individuals familiar with the settlor’s intentions and records demonstrating consistent treatment of the asset as part of the trust strengthen the petition. The more direct and contemporaneous the evidence of intent, the more persuasive the petition will be. Proper organization of documents and clear testimony can reduce the need for extended litigation over title issues.
Yes, filing a petition creates public court records, which can make details about the trust modification a matter of public record. Probate court filings, petitions, and subsequent orders are generally accessible to the public, which contrasts with nonjudicial settlement agreements that can keep matters private. For clients who prioritize confidentiality, exploring nonjudicial options and attempting settlement before filing can preserve privacy when appropriate. When public filing is unavoidable, careful drafting and strategic use of redactions or narrowly tailored pleadings can limit disclosure of sensitive financial details. Discussing privacy concerns with counsel early helps identify which facts are necessary for court review and which can be kept confidential through alternative approaches or limited public filings where permitted by court rules.
Costs for a trust modification petition depend on complexity, the need for litigation, and the amount of factual development required. Simple matters resolved through agreement or short uncontested petitions typically cost less, while contested cases requiring extensive discovery, expert input, or multiple hearings are more expensive. Court filing fees and service costs are additional expenses. Budgeting for potential outcomes and discussing fee structures with counsel helps clients understand likely costs and manage expectations. Early effort to negotiate and explore nonjudicial solutions can reduce total costs and time. Where litigation is necessary, efficient case management, focused discovery, and clear factual presentation help control expenses. Some clients choose limited scope engagement for specific tasks, such as drafting petitions or assembling exhibits, to tailor legal costs to immediate needs while preserving options for broader representation later.
Yes, certain modifications can affect a beneficiary’s eligibility for public benefits such as Medi-Cal or Supplemental Security Income. Changes that increase a beneficiary’s access to assets or alter distributions could impact means-tested benefits. When a beneficiary relies on public assistance, careful planning is necessary to avoid adverse consequences. Options such as special needs trusts or structured distribution provisions can protect benefits while addressing the beneficiary’s needs. Assessing benefit eligibility before making substantive changes is essential. Coordination with benefits counselors or financial advisers experienced in public benefit rules helps design modifications that provide support without jeopardizing assistance. Courts also consider beneficiary protection when approving modifications, and including provisions that preserve eligibility can be persuasive in both negotiations and filings.
Disputes among beneficiaries are often resolved through negotiation, mediation, or court petitions depending on the willingness of parties to cooperate. Mediation and settlement discussions can preserve relationships and achieve mutually acceptable outcomes without public filings. When negotiations fail, petitioning the court for interpretation or modification provides a binding resolution, though it may be more adversarial and public. The best approach balances the desire for privacy and speed against the need for enforceable legal authority. When litigation is necessary, having a well-documented factual record and focused legal arguments helps narrow the issues and supports efficient resolution. Courts evaluate the settlor’s probable intent, documentary evidence, and the interests of beneficiaries when making determinations. Legal counsel helps identify resolution pathways that consider both legal merits and family dynamics to reach the most constructive outcome.
If a trustee refuses to comply with a court order, the court has remedies to enforce its directives, including contempt proceedings, removal of the trustee, or appointment of a successor trustee. Courts take orders seriously and can impose sanctions or require corrective actions to protect beneficiaries’ rights and ensure proper administration of the trust. Petitioning the court for enforcement is the formal mechanism to address noncompliance and restore appropriate trust management. Documenting the trustee’s refusal and presenting that record to the court is important for obtaining enforcement. Courts consider the reasons for noncompliance, any fiduciary breaches, and what relief is necessary to protect the trust and beneficiaries. Prompt legal action and clear presentation of facts encourage timely court intervention to resolve administrative failures.
Begin by gathering all trust-related documents, including the original trust instrument, any amendments, related wills like a pour-over will, account statements, property records, and correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intentions. Review the trust for amendment provisions and identify trustees and beneficiaries. Taking these steps provides a factual foundation for evaluating whether a nonjudicial solution is possible or whether a petition is appropriate. Contact legal counsel to discuss the facts and determine a strategy that fits your goals. An attorney can help identify necessary evidence, advise on potential privacy and tax implications, and outline likely timelines and costs. Early legal input helps prevent missteps that could complicate later proceedings and improves the prospects for an efficient, effective resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas