A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool for beneficiaries and trustees when a trust has not been properly funded with assets that the trustmaker intended to transfer. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist Rio Linda residents in understanding when and how a Heggstad petition may be appropriate to effect the transfer of assets into a trust or to clarify distribution rights. This introduction explains the basic purpose of a Heggstad petition, the common scenarios that lead families to consider filing, and the practical outcomes that a successful petition can achieve for estate administration and family settlement.
This page outlines the steps and considerations involved in pursuing a Heggstad petition in Sacramento County, including how the petition can resolve property transfer issues without undue delay or litigation when a trustmaker intended assets to be trust property. We explain the firm’s approach to evaluating claims, preparing evidence, and presenting the petition to the probate court when necessary. The goal is to provide a clear, accessible overview so you can decide whether this avenue fits your estate planning situation and what to expect from the process in Rio Linda and nearby communities.
A Heggstad petition helps prevent unintended consequences when property expected to be in a trust remains titled in the deceased’s name or otherwise outside the trust. By establishing the trustmaker’s intention and prompting the court to treat certain property as trust assets, the petition can protect beneficiaries’ inheritances and streamline distribution. It may also avoid protracted disputes with heirs or third parties by providing a clear legal determination. For families in Rio Linda, this can mean faster resolution, reduced costs, and greater certainty that the trustmaker’s wishes will be carried out as intended under California law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across San Jose, Rio Linda and Sacramento County, assisting with estate planning and trust administration matters. Our goal is to provide practical, court-ready advocacy and clear guidance for individuals and families who need to resolve trust funding issues or enforce trust terms. We handle Heggstad petitions and related trust matters with careful preparation of documentary evidence and witness statements, and by communicating clearly with clients about timelines and likely outcomes. We work to reduce uncertainty and to protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries throughout each step of the legal process.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property should be treated as part of a trust despite not having been formally transferred into trust title before the trustmaker’s death. This remedy is often sought when the trustmaker clearly intended the asset to be governed by the trust but the necessary paperwork was not completed. The petition requires careful collection of evidence such as account statements, trust documents, beneficiary designations, and testimony that demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent. In many cases, the petition can provide a clear path to ensure assets are distributed according to the trust rather than under intestacy rules.
Filing a Heggstad petition can involve factual investigation and legal argument about the decedent’s intentions and the nature of the property at issue. Courts will consider whether the asset was meant to be trust property and whether allowing treatment as trust property would reflect the decedent’s plans. While the petition aims to minimize disputes and simplify transfer, it can still require precise documentation and persuasive presentation in probate court. Working with counsel who understands local probate practice can help prepare a petition that addresses the court’s concerns and supports efficient resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used to request judicial recognition that a decedent’s property should be treated as part of a trust. Originating from a California case addressing trust funding issues, the petition provides a formal mechanism to align title and control with the trustmaker’s intentions. It typically includes evidence of the trust document, communications or acts showing intent to transfer, and records that connect the asset to the trust. The petition helps trustees obtain clear authority to administer or distribute the asset without prolonged disputes, facilitating faithful implementation of the trustmaker’s plans for their estate and loved ones.
Preparing a Heggstad petition commonly requires gathering documentary evidence such as the trust agreement, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and correspondence showing the trustmaker’s intent. Witness declarations from individuals familiar with the trustmaker’s plans are often important, as are records showing attempted transfers or administrative steps taken before death. The process includes filing the petition with the probate court, serving interested parties, and responding to any opposition. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to decide whether the asset should be treated as trust property for the purposes of administration and distribution under California probate rules.
Understanding common terms used in trust and probate practice helps clarify what to expect during a Heggstad petition. This section defines phrases you will encounter while preparing and pursuing a petition, including distinctions between trust funding, vesting, probate processes, and the role of the trustee. Clear definitions help trustees and beneficiaries gather the right evidence and communicate effectively with the court. When questions arise about how a particular asset should be treated, knowing the language and legal concepts makes it easier to discuss options and plan next steps with legal counsel in Rio Linda or Sacramento County.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring legal title or ownership of assets into the name of the trust so that they are governed by the trust document. Proper funding ensures that the assets are managed and distributed according to the trustmaker’s instructions and can prevent assets from passing through probate. When funding is incomplete or was never completed, a Heggstad petition may be used to ask the court to treat those assets as trust property based on evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and actions. Accurate documentation of funding attempts is often central to resolving the issue.
Probate court recognition in the Heggstad context means the court formally acknowledges that certain assets should be administered under the terms of a trust rather than as part of the decedent’s probate estate. Such recognition can clarify authority for the trustee to manage or distribute assets and prevent competing claims from delaying settlement. The judge’s determination is based on evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent and any relevant actions taken to transfer the asset prior to death. This judicial finding provides legal certainty that assists trustees and beneficiaries in completing estate administration.
Trustmaker intent refers to what the person who created the trust intended to happen with particular assets. Courts consider statements, actions, and written documents that show whether the trustmaker intended a given asset to be part of the trust. Evidence may include drafts, transfer requests, beneficiary designations, account titling changes, or statements to family or advisors. Demonstrating intent is often the heart of a Heggstad petition because it links the contested property to the trust’s terms and supports a court ruling to treat the property as trust property for administration and distribution.
Constructive trust principles are equitable doctrines courts may consider when property is held in a way that does not reflect the true ownership intention, allowing the court to impose trust-like treatment to prevent unjust enrichment. In the context of a Heggstad petition, these principles support arguments that assets should be treated as belonging to the trust based on the trustmaker’s intent and surrounding circumstances. Courts weigh evidence and equitable considerations to decide whether imposing trust treatment is appropriate, balancing fairness to beneficiaries with legal title and intervening interests.
When assets remain outside of a trust, parties may choose different legal routes to resolve ownership and distribution: filing a Heggstad petition, pursuing a probate administration, or negotiating transfers with third parties. A Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition that the assets belong to the trust based on the trustmaker’s intent. Probate distributes assets under the will or intestacy rules and can be more time-consuming. Negotiation or settlement can avoid court involvement but requires cooperation. The best approach depends on asset value, the clarity of the trustmaker’s intent, the willingness of successors to cooperate, and the presence of competing claims.
A limited approach may work well when documentary and testimonial evidence clearly show the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust and all interested parties are willing to follow that intention. In such cases, trustees and beneficiaries can sometimes complete transfers or execute corrective documents with minimal court intervention, saving time and expense. Even with cooperative parties, careful documentation and proper recordkeeping are important to avoid future disputes. When all sides agree, resolving the issue collaboratively is often faster and less stressful for family members.
When the asset involved is of relatively low value or the title defect is straightforward, parties may opt for administrative correction or simple transfer procedures rather than filing a Heggstad petition. Handling minor issues informally or through routine post-death administration can be more cost-effective and reduce involvement of the probate court. Still, it is important to document any corrective actions taken and to ensure the trustee has appropriate authority to complete transfers. Even modest assets deserve careful treatment to protect beneficiaries and prevent disputes down the road.
Complex title defects, high-value assets, or disputed ownership increase the need for a comprehensive legal approach that includes formal pleadings, thorough evidence gathering, and court advocacy. These situations often present factual disputes or competing claims that require judicial resolution. A comprehensive process ensures that the petition is properly framed, that all necessary disclosures and notices are made to interested parties, and that the court receives the evidence it needs to rule in a way that secures the trustmaker’s intended result and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
When family relationships are strained or when potential heirs contest whether assets belong to the trust, a complete legal strategy becomes important to anticipate objections, prepare responses, and present a persuasive record to the court. This includes drafting declarations, organizing documentary evidence, and managing procedural steps under California probate rules. A thoughtful, court-focused approach aims to reduce the chance of reversal and to move the matter to final resolution as efficiently as possible in the face of contention.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition increases the likelihood that the court will accept the trustmaker’s intent and that assets will be treated consistently with the trust’s terms. It involves careful preparation of evidence, clear legal argumentation, and strategic communication with interested parties. This reduces the risk of later challenges and can provide trustees with authoritative court directions for administering disputed assets. For beneficiaries, comprehensive handling helps secure distributions and can limit delays caused by contested claims or unclear title issues.
Thorough preparation also helps control costs by addressing potential hurdles early, avoiding repeated filings, and focusing the court on the key factual and legal questions. A well-prepared petition clarifies issues for the court, shortens hearings, and can lead to more predictable timelines. Trustees benefit from written court orders that confirm authority to act, while beneficiaries gain assurance that the decedent’s wishes will be honored. Overall, a methodical approach supports efficient estate resolution and preserves estate assets for their intended recipients.
Securing a court determination through a Heggstad petition provides clear legal authority for the trustee to manage and distribute assets in accordance with the trust document. This clarity prevents confusion about who controls disputed property and reduces the likelihood of competing claims that can delay distribution. Having an official court ruling can make third parties more willing to cooperate with transfers and give beneficiaries confidence that the trustmaker’s intentions will be followed. This benefit is particularly valuable for assets that would otherwise be subject to contested ownership or unclear titling.
A comprehensive petition builds a robust record that can deter or defeat future challenges to the trust’s control of an asset. Detailed evidence and careful procedural compliance make it harder for later disputes to upset distributions. When the court issues a judgment recognizing the asset as trust property, that order creates a formal legal basis that helps protect beneficiaries and trustees against subsequent claims. This level of protection is important when the assets at issue have significant value or when potential claimants might seek to relitigate ownership at a later time.
Collecting documentation early is vital to a successful Heggstad petition. Begin by locating the trust document and any drafts, account statements, deeds, correspondence, and beneficiary designations that connect the property to the trustmaker’s intentions. Statements from financial institutions and records of attempted transfers can provide important evidence. Witness statements from family members or advisors who recall discussions about the trust are also helpful. Organizing materials before filing reduces delays, supports the petition’s factual foundation, and helps the court rapidly assess whether the asset should be treated as trust property.
A Heggstad petition proceeds through the probate court, which operates on particular rules and timelines. Plan ahead for required filings, notices, and potential hearings, and be ready to present organized documentary evidence and declarations. Understand that the court may request additional proof or clarification, and anticipate potential objections by collecting corroborating details early. Proper procedural preparation improves the chances of a prompt ruling and limits the risk of procedural dismissal or delay. Familiarity with local court practices in Sacramento County can also streamline the process and reduce surprises.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset that the trustmaker intended to be part of the trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, when beneficiary designations conflict with trust terms, or when transfers were attempted but not completed prior to death. This remedy helps align legal title with the trustmaker’s documented wishes and can shorten the time needed to distribute assets to beneficiaries. It is particularly relevant when clear evidence supports the intent to fund the trust but administrative errors, oversight, or clerical issues left the property outside the trust’s title at death.
You should also consider filing a Heggstad petition when third parties refuse to transfer assets to the trustee without a court ruling or when competing heirs threaten to obstruct distribution. The petition can provide a formal court order that clarifies rights and obligations, which often encourages cooperation from financial institutions and other holders of property. Ultimately, pursuing this action can save estate assets by avoiding extended probate or protracted litigation and by securing authoritative directions for trustees to administer the trust properly.
Typical circumstances include bank or investment accounts that were not retitled into the trust, real property where a deed was not recorded in the trust’s name, or retirement accounts and policies with inconsistent beneficiary designations. Life changes, oversight, or misguided assumptions about funding can leave assets unfunded. A Heggstad petition addresses these issues by presenting evidence of intent and asking the court to recognize the assets as trust property for administration and distribution. This process is frequently used when swift clarification is needed to carry out the trustmaker’s plans.
Bank and investment accounts are commonly left in the decedent’s name rather than the trust, either because the owner believed beneficiary designations would suffice or because transfers were not completed. When this occurs, trustees may face resistance from institutions that require probate paperwork or a court order before releasing funds. A Heggstad petition demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent and commonly resolves these obstacles, allowing trustees to access and manage accounts as trust assets in accordance with the trust document and applicable court directions.
Real estate intended to be held in trust but left recorded in the individual’s name poses challenges for trustees who need clear authority to handle or transfer property. Recording errors, procrastination, or timing issues can leave title inconsistent with the trust terms. Filing a Heggstad petition can assist in establishing that the property should be treated as trust property and prompt the court to direct record changes or other administrative steps. This remedy helps prevent disputes among heirs and supports orderly resolution of the decedent’s real estate interests.
When beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, life insurance policies, or other instruments conflict with the trust’s provisions, questions arise about which instructions govern distribution. If the trustmaker intended an account to pass to the trust but named individual beneficiaries on an account form, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to resolve the conflict. The petition allows the court to evaluate the trustmaker’s overall estate plan and determine whether the asset should be aligned with the trust’s directions, thereby streamlining distribution consistent with the decedent’s intent.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides legal services to Rio Linda and the greater Sacramento County area, offering practical guidance on trust funding, Heggstad petitions, and related probate matters. We focus on clear communication, timely action, and careful preparation of the records needed for court consideration. Whether you are a trustee seeking authority to act or a beneficiary who wants to protect inheritance rights, we can evaluate your situation, identify necessary evidence, and help you pursue the most appropriate path to resolve funding or transfer issues under California law.
Choosing a law firm for a Heggstad petition involves assessing experience in probate court practice, understanding of trust documentation, and ability to prepare persuasive factual records. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we combine practical courtroom knowledge with careful attention to case details to present petitions that address the court’s concerns. Our process emphasizes organizing clear documentary evidence, preparing witness declarations, and ensuring that procedural requirements and notices to interested parties are properly handled, all aimed at achieving a durable court determination in favor of treating assets as trust property.
We work closely with trustees and beneficiaries to explain likely outcomes, timelines, and the evidence needed to support a petition. Knowing when a petition is appropriate and when alternatives like informal transfers or probate administration are preferable helps clients make informed choices. Our firm communicates promptly about next steps, assists with document collection, and carefully prepares filings so the court can quickly assess and rule on the matter. This combination of clear guidance and process focus helps reduce uncertainty for families facing trust funding issues.
Our practice also emphasizes responsiveness to client needs during sensitive family transitions, including addressing creditor concerns, coordinating with financial institutions, and advising on related estate planning steps to prevent future funding issues. We help trustees implement court orders and complete necessary record changes to align titles with trust terms. Our goal is to help clients resolve trust funding problems efficiently, protect estate assets, and carry out the trustmaker’s intentions with minimal disruption to family relationships and estate administration.
Our approach to Heggstad petitions begins with a thorough case evaluation to identify the key documents and facts that support treating property as trust assets. We assist in gathering trust documents, account records, deeds, and witness statements, and then prepare a petition tailored to the court’s requirements. We handle required notices, coordinate service on interested persons, and advocate in court hearings if necessary. Throughout the process, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed about timelines, potential outcomes, and any additional information the court requests to reach a decision that honors the trustmaker’s intent.
The initial stage focuses on identifying what assets are in question, reviewing the trust instrument, and collecting documents that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent to place those assets in the trust. This may include statements, deeds, beneficiary forms, and emails or notes describing planned transfers. We also interview potential witnesses who can corroborate the trustmaker’s plans. Building a well-documented factual foundation at this stage is critical to presenting a persuasive petition to the probate court and minimizing the chance of delays caused by missing evidence or procedural defects.
We carefully review the trust document to confirm the trustmaker’s declared intentions, distribution provisions, and any instructions related to funding. Title records for real property and account records for financial assets are examined to determine the current ownership status and identify discrepancies. This review allows us to connect specific assets to the trust terms and to plan remedial steps. Understanding the trust’s language and the status of each asset guides the evidence we collect and shapes the narrative presented in the petition to show why the asset should be deemed trust property.
Supporting declarations from family, advisors, or financial professionals who recall the trustmaker’s intentions can be pivotal to a Heggstad petition. We assist in drafting clear declarations that explain the facts and the witness’s basis for knowledge. Correspondence such as emails or written instructions regarding transfers, or records of attempted retitling, are included to show concrete steps taken before death. Together, these materials create a cohesive evidentiary package that the court can evaluate to determine whether the asset should be treated in accordance with the trust.
With evidence assembled, we draft the formal petition and supporting documents to present the factual and legal basis for treating the property as trust assets. The filing includes the petition, declarations, exhibits, and proofs of service for interested parties. Careful attention is paid to meeting local filing requirements, formatting exhibits, and ensuring all relevant parties receive notice. Proper preparation at this stage helps avoid procedural setbacks and positions the petition for prompt judicial consideration by clearly presenting the legal questions and supporting evidence.
Drafting involves articulating a persuasive factual narrative that links the asset to the trustmaker’s intentions and presenting exhibits in a way that is easy for the court to review. We organize pleadings to highlight key documents and statements, and we prepare legal argumentation focused on relevant California authority and probate practice. Well-crafted exhibits and declarations reduce the court’s need for additional inquiries and can lead to more efficient hearings. The goal is to make the court’s review straightforward and to secure recognition of the asset as trust property.
After filing, we ensure that required parties are properly served and monitor the case for any objections or requests for further information. If objections arise, we prepare responses, supplemental declarations, or additional documentation to address issues raised by other parties. Managing the procedural aspects carefully helps avoid delays and strengthens the position presented to the court. Our focus is on comprehensive preparation so that hearings address the substantive questions rather than procedural deficiencies that could hinder resolution.
The court may hold a hearing to evaluate the petition, at which we present the organized evidence and respond to any challenges. The hearing allows the judge to assess witness statements and documentary support, consider objections, and ask clarifying questions. If the court is persuaded that the asset should be treated as trust property, it will issue an order reflecting that determination and directing how the asset should be administered or recorded. The order creates the legal authority trustees need to proceed with distribution in accordance with the trust.
Preparing for a hearing requires reviewing all declarations, exhibits, and potential testimony to ensure a cohesive presentation. We rehearse the factual themes and verify that witnesses understand their written statements. Anticipating likely objections allows us to prepare concise responses and to provide the court with focused documentation. Thorough hearing preparation aims to make the key facts clear to the judge so the court can reach an informed decision based on the totality of the evidence presented.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we help trustees implement the order by coordinating with financial institutions, recording any necessary deeds, and completing administrative steps to transfer title or control. We also advise on related matters such as tax reporting, creditor notifications, and updating estate records to reflect the court’s determination. Implementing the order promptly helps trustees act with confidence and ensures that the trust’s terms are followed for the benefit of intended beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that property should be treated as part of a trust despite not being formally retitled during the trustmaker’s lifetime. It is used when evidence shows the trustmaker intended the asset to be governed by the trust but the transfer or retitling was never completed. The petition presents documentary and testimonial proof of intent and any steps that were taken to fund the trust to persuade the probate court to treat the asset as trust property. Filing this petition can clarify authority for the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms and avoid the asset passing through standard probate distribution. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order if it finds that recognizing the asset as trust property would reflect the trustmaker’s intentions, thereby helping complete estate administration in accordance with the trust.
Timelines for a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the evidence, whether interested parties object, and the court’s calendar. In straightforward, uncontested cases where documentation is complete, the process can move more quickly, while contested matters or requests for additional proof can extend the timeline. Probate courts in Sacramento County have their own scheduling and procedural requirements that affect hearing dates and resolution timing. Preparing a thorough petition and addressing potential objections in advance tends to shorten the process. Prompt collection of records, clear declarations, and proper service on interested parties all help the court to evaluate the petition efficiently and reach a decision that enables trustees to proceed with administration.
Supporting evidence typically includes the trust document, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence reflecting transfer intentions, and any drafts or notes showing the trustmaker planned to fund the trust. Declarations from witnesses who recall the trustmaker’s instructions or who assisted with transfers can strengthen the petition, as can records from financial institutions confirming efforts to retitle accounts or transfer property prior to death. The specific evidence needed depends on the asset and circumstances. Real property commonly requires deeds or title searches, while bank accounts may need statements and beneficiary forms. Presenting a cohesive package of documents and witness statements that align with the trustmaker’s intent is key to persuading the court to treat the asset as trust property.
A Heggstad petition can sometimes eliminate the need for a separate probate administration for specific assets by obtaining a court ruling that recognizes those assets as trust property, allowing them to be administered under the trust. This can reduce the scope of probate involvement and speed distribution for assets that are successfully recognized. However, if other probate issues exist or if the estate includes assets that must pass through probate, a broader probate administration may still be necessary. Whether probate can be avoided depends on the nature and value of other assets, creditor claims, and whether the Heggstad petition resolves all contested ownership issues. Evaluating the entire estate plan and asset profile helps determine the most efficient path for estate settlement and whether additional probate proceedings are required.
If someone contests a Heggstad petition, the court will consider objections and may require additional evidence or hearings to resolve disputed facts. Contests often focus on whether the trustmaker truly intended the asset to be part of the trust or on the sufficiency of the documentation presented. When objections are raised, it is important to respond with supplemental declarations, documentary proof, and legal argument that address the challenges and show why the court should recognize the asset as trust property. Contested matters can extend the timeline and increase costs, so preparing a thorough initial petition and attempting to resolve disputes through communication or limited negotiation can sometimes avoid prolonged litigation. If a contest proceeds, presenting organized evidence and clear testimony improves the chance of securing a favorable court determination.
A court order recognizing an asset as trust property does not automatically retitle property at the county recorder or financial institution level, but it provides the legal authority trustees need to request record changes or to instruct institutions to transfer or release assets. After obtaining the order, trustees typically present the decree to institutions or record the court document to effectuate the desired changes. The practical result is that institutions and third parties will accept the court order as the basis for completing transfers or retitling. Implementation steps may include recording a certified copy of the order with the county recorder for real property or presenting the court order to banks and brokerage firms, which usually accept the order as sufficient authority to transfer funds or change ownership. The order is therefore a critical tool for converting the court’s recognition into actual administrative changes.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include informal transfers where all interested parties agree to sign corrective documents or administrative steps taken with financial institutions that accept trustee instructions based on other proof. Mediation or negotiation among heirs and beneficiaries may produce an agreement that avoids court proceedings. In some cases, a probate administration or an agreement executed by all relevant parties can achieve similar results without a Heggstad petition if cooperation is present and no party objects. However, when institutions require a court order or when disputes exist, alternatives may not be viable. Evaluating the practicality of alternatives depends on the willingness of parties to cooperate, the requirements of third-party holders of property, and the strength of available evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad petition vary with complexity, including attorney fees, court filing fees, service costs, and potential expenses for title searches or expert services. Straightforward, uncontested matters generally incur lower expenses, while contested cases require more preparation, filings, and possibly multiple hearings, which increases costs. Upfront budgeting and a clear plan for evidence collection help manage expenses and avoid surprises during the process. Discussing potential fees and cost estimates with counsel early allows trustees and beneficiaries to weigh options and consider alternatives where appropriate. Transparent communication about anticipated steps and cost factors helps families make informed choices about whether to pursue a petition or to seek other resolutions.
A court order recognizing an asset as trust property gives trustees persuasive authority when dealing with banks and other institutions. Financial institutions typically accept a certified court order as the basis to release funds, transfer accounts, or retitle assets according to the court’s determination. Presenting the order along with trustee identification and trust documentation usually resolves institutional reluctance and enables the trustee to manage the asset under the trust’s terms. If an institution resists, the order remains a strong legal instrument to enforce compliance, and counsel can assist in communicating with the institution or taking necessary follow-up steps. Having a formal judicial finding reduces disputes and streamlines interactions with third parties responsible for holding or transferring assets.
Preventing future need for a Heggstad petition begins with proactive trust funding while the trustmaker is alive. This includes retitling bank and investment accounts, recording deeds for real property in the trust’s name when appropriate, and coordinating beneficiary designations to align with trust provisions. Regular reviews of estate planning documents and account titles help catch discrepancies before they create problems for successors. Clear instructions and properly executed transfers reduce the likelihood of assets being left outside the trust at death. Working with estate planning counsel to maintain up-to-date documentation and to verify that changes have been recorded can prevent administrative oversights. Periodic reviews and a checklist for funding trust assets aid in ensuring that the trust operates as intended and that beneficiaries can rely on straightforward administration without needing court intervention.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas