A trust modification petition seeks court approval to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances make the original provisions impractical, ambiguous, or inconsistent with the settlor’s current intentions. In Hollister and surrounding San Benito County communities, individuals and families commonly pursue modifications to address changes in relationships, financial circumstances, tax law, or beneficiary needs. The process often involves gathering documentation, identifying affected parties, and demonstrating to the court that the modification is appropriate under California law. This guide explains how a trust modification petition works and what to expect from start to finish.
Many people think a trust is immutable once created, but California law allows modifications in a range of situations when the settlor is unavailable or when all interested parties agree. Where unanimous consent is not possible, petitioning the court becomes necessary to resolve disputes or to correct drafting errors, address changed circumstances, or effect financial planning updates. The court evaluates the proposed changes against statutory standards and the trust’s original intent. Understanding procedural steps, timelines, and likely outcomes helps clients make informed decisions and preserve family relationships during a sensitive legal process.
Pursuing a trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s overarching goals while adapting to new realities, such as remarriage, death of a beneficiary, changes in health, or tax law updates. When handled properly, a modification helps prevent unintended consequences, reduces future conflicts among beneficiaries, and clarifies trustee powers and duties. The court-supervised process offers legal finality and enforceable outcomes when informal agreements are insufficient. For families in Hollister, achieving a clear and updated trust can provide peace of mind and a smoother transition of assets according to the settlor’s revised wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has focused on estate planning matters for individuals and families throughout San Jose, San Benito County, and the greater Bay Area. Our team addresses trust drafting, amendments, and litigation with a practical approach rooted in careful analysis and clear communication. We assist clients in assembling documentation, preparing petitions, and representing them in court hearings when necessary. Clients value our local knowledge of court practices and our patient guidance through potentially emotional conversations with family members and trustees about necessary changes to long-standing estate plans.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate court to alter the terms, provisions, or administration of a trust. Petitions may be needed when the settlor is deceased or incapacitated and the trust needs correction for mistakes, ambiguities, or unforeseen changes. Common grounds include clerical errors, changed beneficiary needs, tax law updates, or circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose. The court examines the trust document, relevant communications, and any supporting evidence to determine whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and the interests of beneficiaries.
When parties agree to a modification, they can sometimes execute a written amendment without court involvement, but disagreements or incapacity often require judicial intervention. California procedures provide mechanisms for both consent-based changes and contested petitions. Interested parties, including trustees and beneficiaries, receive notice and an opportunity to respond. The court may approve, reject, or shape the modification and can allocate costs or set enforceable terms. Understanding these options helps families decide whether negotiation, mediation, or a formal petition best serves their needs.
A trust modification petition requests that the court amend the written terms or administrative provisions of a trust to reflect a corrected understanding of the settlor’s intent or to accommodate changed circumstances. The petition lays out factual and legal reasons for the requested changes, including evidence such as draft documents, correspondence, or proof of changed circumstances that make the original terms inequitable or unworkable. The court focuses on protecting beneficiaries and ensuring that modifications are legally permissible, properly documented, and consistent with relevant California statutes and case law.
A successful petition typically contains a clear statement of the trust’s relevant provisions, the specific changes sought, factual support for the modification, and legal arguments showing why the court should approve the request. Required procedural elements include proper notice to interested parties, filing the correct forms with the probate court, and providing supporting declarations and exhibits. The court may hold a hearing to evaluate objections and assess whether the modification serves the trust’s purpose. Preparation, thorough documentation, and respectful communication with other parties improve the likelihood of an efficient outcome.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and make informed decisions. Definitions clarify roles and procedures that often arise in petitions, including terms about parties’ interests and legal standards. Clear terminology reduces confusion in court filings and communications with trustees or beneficiaries. This section provides plain-language explanations for terms frequently encountered in trust modification petitions in California, aiding both petitioners and respondents in recognizing their rights and obligations throughout the proceeding.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who originally created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s documented intent, as reflected in the trust instrument and related writings, guides the court when evaluating petitions to modify trust terms. When the settlor is alive and competent, they may often make amendments directly; when they are incapacitated or deceased, others must show why a modification aligns with the settlor’s intent. Evidence such as draft trust language, correspondence, or contemporaneous notes may prove persuasive when seeking a court-authorized change.
Beneficiaries are individuals or entities entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have standing to oppose or support proposed modifications because changes can affect their distributions or the timing and conditions under which they receive trust assets. The court weighs beneficiaries’ interests alongside the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s intent, and it ensures that procedural protections such as notice and an opportunity to be heard are afforded. Clear communication among beneficiaries and trustees can sometimes avoid contested litigation and lead to voluntary settlements.
A trustee manages trust assets in accordance with the trust terms and relevant law, acting as a fiduciary for beneficiaries. Trustees are responsible for administering distributions, maintaining records, and following instructions to the extent the trust permits. When a petition seeks to modify a trust, the trustee’s role may include providing information, implementing interim measures, or defending administration choices. The court can clarify or adjust trustee powers as part of a modification so the trustee can carry out the settlor’s revised intent without future disputes.
A petition is a formal filing asking the probate court to interpret, reform, or modify a trust instrument. Judicial review involves the court examining evidence, legal arguments, and statutory criteria to decide whether the requested changes are permissible. The court may resolve contested factual disputes, enforce settlement terms, or issue directives governing future administration. Judicial oversight provides enforceable results when parties cannot reach agreement on their own, and it helps prevent later challenges by documenting the legal basis for approved modifications.
When considering changes to a trust, options include informal amendment by the settlor, written amendment by consent of all interested parties, mediated agreements, or a court petition when disagreements or incapacity prevent a nonjudicial route. Informal amendments are efficient but only available when the settlor can act. Consent-based changes avoid litigation but require all parties to agree in writing. A court petition becomes necessary when unanimity is lacking or when a judicial determination is needed to resolve ambiguity or correct a mistake. Each path involves tradeoffs in cost, privacy, and finality.
If the settlor remains competent and able to execute an amendment, making changes directly to the trust document or adding a compatible amendment can resolve many issues without court involvement. These updates are often the fastest and least expensive option when the trust terms need to reflect changes in personal relationships, accountant recommendations, or beneficiary circumstances. Proper recordkeeping and clear execution formalities are important to avoid later disputes. When situations are straightforward and parties are cooperative, a limited nonjudicial amendment preserves privacy and reduces legal fees compared with contested proceedings.
When all beneficiaries agree in writing to a modification, it may be possible to amend the trust by mutual consent without court intervention, provided statutory requirements are met. This path can be appropriate where changes are minor, clearly beneficial, and do not violate other legal protections. Achieving consensus often requires open dialogue and documentation showing the beneficiaries’ informed agreement. While this approach saves time and maintains confidentiality, it is not suitable when a beneficiary objects or when the settlor’s incapacity or death makes voluntary amendment impossible.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about proposed changes, a contested petition requires careful legal strategy, thorough evidence gathering, and familiarity with probate court procedures. Comprehensive representation ensures that petitions are drafted to address likely objections, that legal standards are met, and that notices and service requirements are properly handled. In contested matters, a full-service approach also helps manage settlement discussions and negotiation to reach sustainable resolutions that minimize prolonged litigation and preserve family relationships where possible.
Certain modifications affect tax planning, retirement assets, irrevocable provisions, or health care directives and therefore require detailed legal analysis and coordination with other professionals. Incapacity of the settlor or competing claims to authority can further complicate matters. A comprehensive legal approach addresses statutory hurdles and administrative steps needed to implement changes safely, and it anticipates consequences for estate tax exposure, beneficiary entitlements, and creditor rights. Planning ahead and evaluating alternatives helps avoid unanticipated adverse effects on trust assets and heirs.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification provides legal certainty through formal court approval and reduces the risk of future challenges by documenting the basis for changes. When modifications are court-supervised, trustees receive clear instructions and beneficiaries gain enforceable expectations about distributions. This formal resolution can prevent costly disputes later, preserve family harmony, and ensure the trust continues to reflect the settlor’s intent in light of new circumstances. Careful drafting and court review also help align administrative provisions with modern fiduciary practices and reporting requirements.
In addition to legal finality, a comprehensive process offers protection when dealing with complicated asset structures, tax-sensitive transfers, or competing beneficiary claims. It allows for a well-documented record that explains the rationale for changes, supports trustee actions, and clarifies long-term administration. By addressing potential ambiguities and foreseeing enforcement challenges, a court-involved modification reduces uncertainty and makes it easier for trustees to fulfill their duties with confidence, minimizing the likelihood of later litigation or disputes over interpretation.
Court-approved modifications generally carry greater weight against later challenges because a judge has reviewed and authorized the changes after considering the evidence and objections. This legal finality deters subsequent disputes and provides a clear framework for trustees to administer the trust. Detailed findings of fact and orders can be particularly valuable when modifications affect large estates, charitable gifts, or complex beneficiary arrangements. By creating a judicial record, clients can protect long-term interests and reduce the potential costs and emotional strain of recurrent litigation.
A thorough approach clarifies trustee powers, distribution standards, and administrative procedures so trustees have a transparent mandate and beneficiaries understand their rights. Clear court orders minimize disputes about interpretation and implementation, and they streamline ongoing administration by establishing accepted practices and timelines. When trustees operate with well-defined authority, they can address creditor claims, tax obligations, and reporting requirements with reduced ambiguity, ensuring that distributions proceed in accordance with the settlor’s updated wishes and California law.
Collecting all pertinent documents at the outset helps streamline the petition process and strengthens the factual record. Useful materials include the original trust instrument, any amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, correspondence showing intent, financial account statements, and valuation data. Having complete documentation reduces delay, supports specific factual assertions, and helps the court understand the reasons for the requested changes. Early organization also facilitates discussion with trustees and beneficiaries and allows legal counsel to prepare a focused petition.
Before pursuing a modification, evaluate the long-term impacts on tax planning, beneficiary relationships, and administration. Some changes that seem helpful in the short term may create unintended exposure to creditors or affect eligibility for public benefits. Coordinate with financial and tax advisors where appropriate to understand consequences for retirement accounts, life insurance trusts, or irrevocable provisions. A thoughtful review anticipates practical administration issues and helps ensure that revisions align with the settlor’s broader goals and the family’s future needs.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect the settlor’s intent or when unforeseen circumstances make existing provisions problematic. Examples include changed family dynamics, the death or incapacity of a beneficiary, administrative provisions that impede efficient management, or scrivener errors that produce ambiguity. Petitioning the court can correct mistakes, clarify ambiguities, and adapt the trust to current law or changed financial situations. Taking action sooner rather than later helps maintain an orderly estate plan and reduces the risk of conflict among heirs.
Other reasons to pursue a petition include the need to update trustee powers, address tax planning concerns, or consolidate trust administration when assets or accounts have been overlooked. A court-approved modification is particularly important when the settlor is not able to amend the trust directly, or when a beneficiary objects to proposed changes. Seeking formal judicial relief provides legal certainty and a documented path forward that trustees can rely on while carrying out their duties in accordance with the revised terms.
Typical circumstances prompting petitions include drafting errors that contradict the settlor’s intent, ambiguities about distribution conditions, beneficiaries who predecease others without alternate provisions, or changes in family structure such as remarriage or divorce. Complex assets like retirement accounts or life insurance may require coordination with trust terms, and changes in tax law can make previous strategies impractical. A petition can also address administrative obstacles, designate successor trustees, or correct omissions that affect the trust’s operation and beneficiaries’ expectations.
When trust provisions are unclear or contradictory, the trustee may be uncertain how to administer distributions, and beneficiaries may dispute the intended meaning. A petition asking the court to interpret or reform the document can resolve ambiguity by establishing a definitive reading consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. Courts consider drafting history, related documents, and reasonable interpretations to reach a determination. Clarifying language through the judicial process prevents ongoing disagreement and provides trustees with the authority needed to carry out distributions properly.
Significant life changes for beneficiaries, such as incapacity, financial hardship, or the need for long-term care, can render existing trust terms impractical or unfair. A modification can alter distribution schedules, create special needs protections, or redirect assets to better support beneficiary needs. The court examines whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s original purposes and whether they are reasonable under current circumstances. Thoughtful revisions help preserve the value of trust assets and better meet intended support goals for beneficiaries.
Clerical mistakes, omissions, or references to nonexistent provisions can produce outcomes the settlor did not intend. A petition to reform or correct the trust asks the court to modify the document to reflect what the settlor actually intended to accomplish. Evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence, or contemporaneous notes can support a claim that an error occurred. Court-ordered correction helps ensure the trust operates as planned and protects beneficiaries from administration based on unintended language.
We assist Hollister and San Benito County residents with all aspects of trust modification petitions, from initial evaluation through court representation when needed. Our approach emphasizes careful fact gathering, clear explanation of options, and proactive communication with trustees and beneficiaries. We help assemble supporting documentation, prepare the necessary filings for the probate court, and work to resolve disputes through negotiation or hearing as appropriate. Whether updating administrative provisions or pursuing a contested modification, we guide clients toward durable solutions that reflect the settlor’s wishes and comply with California law.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for thoughtful, client-centered representation in estate planning and trust-related matters. We focus on clear communication, careful preparation of court filings, and practical strategies tailored to each family’s needs. Our team helps clients understand legal options, anticipate likely responses from beneficiaries, and document the factual support necessary for a petition. We aim to resolve disputes efficiently while preserving relationships and protecting trust assets for their intended beneficiaries over the long term.
When litigation is necessary, we advocate for positions grounded in established law and supported by thorough evidence. We carefully prepare declarations, exhibits, and legal arguments to present a persuasive petition to the court, and we coordinate with financial and tax advisors when multi-disciplinary input is needed. Our goal is to secure a legally sound modification that trustees can implement with confidence, while minimizing the time and expense associated with contested proceedings and keeping clients informed at each step of the process.
We also emphasize alternatives to litigation, including negotiation and mediation, when those paths can achieve acceptable outcomes with less disruption. Our team works to identify opportunities for settlement and to craft written agreements that address concerns of all parties involved. Where court approval remains the best option, we prepare petitions that are clear, well-documented, and focused on achieving durable results that reflect the settlor’s revised intentions and preserve trust value for beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to gather the trust documents, related instruments like pour-over wills or powers of attorney, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. We analyze whether amicable amendment, beneficiary agreement, or a court petition is the appropriate route. If petitioning the court is necessary, we prepare the filing packet, identify interested parties for proper notice, assemble supporting evidence, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we prioritize transparent communication and practical solutions designed to protect asset interests and family relationships.
We begin by reviewing the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate documents, and available supporting evidence to determine the legal grounds for modification. This stage includes identifying all interested parties, assessing potential objections, and outlining possible outcomes. Thorough document collection helps craft a focused petition and anticipates evidentiary needs for court review. We also advise on interim measures trustees can take to preserve assets and reduce tension while the matter is resolved.
Collecting originals or certified copies of the trust, amendments, wills, powers of attorney, and related correspondence is critical to supporting a petition. Financial statements, account valuations, and records of transfers into the trust also help illustrate the trust’s operation and any potential errors or omissions. Clear documentation strengthens factual claims and assists the court in understanding the settlor’s intent. Early organization reduces delays and enables counsel to draft precise petition language that addresses likely disputes and evidentiary challenges.
Identifying beneficiaries, trustees, and potential claimants ensures proper notice and helps anticipate objections that may arise. Understanding relationships and prior communications among parties allows for early outreach and potential resolution. We evaluate each party’s likely position and design a petition strategy that addresses foreseeable concerns. Proper service and notice compliance are essential procedural requirements for court jurisdiction and for protecting the petition’s enforceability once finalized.
Once the facts and legal basis are clear, we draft a petition that sets out the requested modification, supporting facts, and legal authority for the change. The filing package typically includes declarations, exhibits, notice forms, and a proposed order for the court. We file the petition with the probate court serving Hollister and ensure that all statutory notice and service requirements are satisfied. Clear, well-documented filings help the court focus on the substantive issues and may shorten the time to resolution.
Detailed declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or other witnesses can establish the factual record supporting the requested change. Exhibits such as earlier drafts of the trust, correspondence that demonstrates intent, and documentation of changed circumstances help persuade the court that modification is appropriate. Careful presentation of evidence reduces ambiguity and assists the judge in reaching a reasoned decision that aligns with the settlor’s likely objectives and with legal standards under California law.
After filing, interested parties must be served with notice and given an opportunity to respond. If objections arise, we address them by submitting responsive declarations, negotiating settlements, or preparing for a hearing. Timely and effective responses to objections can narrow disputed issues and sometimes lead to resolution through mediation or stipulated orders. Where litigation proceeds, our filings frame contested questions for the court and provide the legal and factual basis supporting the requested modification.
The court may schedule a hearing to consider objections and evaluate the evidence before deciding on the petition. If the court approves the modification, it issues an order reflecting the revised terms and any instructions for administration. We assist clients in implementing the order, updating trust records, and communicating changes to financial institutions and beneficiaries. If the petition is denied or partially granted, we advise on next steps, including potential appeals or alternative planning measures to address the underlying concerns.
Preparing for a hearing includes organizing exhibits, refining witness declarations, and formulating persuasive legal arguments tailored to the judge’s likely concerns. Clear presentation helps the court focus on the dispositive facts and statutory standards, and careful preparation can reduce the time spent in court. We coordinate witness testimony when needed and present the case in a manner designed to secure an order that reflects the settlor’s intent and provides actionable guidance for trustees carrying out the revised terms.
After obtaining a court order, trustees should update trust records, notify financial institutions, and take any administrative actions required by the decision. We assist in preparing certified copies of the order, filing any necessary court updates, and advising trustees on compliance with reporting or distribution requirements. Proper implementation helps prevent further disputes and ensures that beneficiaries receive distributions in accordance with the modified plan, while preserving the integrity of the trust’s administration for the long term.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court asking for a change to the terms or administration of an existing trust when informal amendment is unavailable or parties disagree. Petitions commonly address drafting errors, ambiguities, changed circumstances, or the settlor’s incapacity or death. The court reviews the petition, supporting evidence, and any objections, then decides whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and applicable law. A clear petition explains the requested changes and the factual basis for them. Filing a petition becomes necessary when the settlor cannot sign an amendment, when beneficiaries cannot all agree, or when a judicial determination is needed to correct mistakes or clarify ambiguous provisions. The process includes providing notice to interested parties, compiling declarations and exhibits, and, if objections arise, presenting the matter at a hearing. The court may approve, deny, or modify the requested relief based on the record presented and the statutory standards that apply in California.
Yes, sometimes a trust can be changed without going to court if the settlor is alive and competent to make an amendment, or if all beneficiaries consent to a written amendment under applicable law. These nonjudicial paths are often faster, less costly, and remain private. When parties can reach a unanimous agreement and follow the required formalities, they may document the change without court involvement, provided that doing so does not violate other legal protections or third-party rights. However, if the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and unanimous consent is not possible, or if a dispute exists about the trust’s meaning or validity, a court petition may be required to effect the desired modification. A petition provides a definitive judicial resolution that is enforceable and reduces the risk of future challenges, which may be preferable in complex or contested situations.
When filing a trust modification petition in California, the petitioner must provide notice to all interested parties, which typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, the current trustee, and any persons who would have a substantial interest in the outcome. Proper notice procedures are governed by statute and by local probate court rules, and failing to follow them can jeopardize the court’s authority to act on the petition. A complete list of interested parties helps ensure due process and protects the enforceability of any resulting order. In some cases, additional notice may be required to parties with potential claims against the trust or to heirs who would be affected by modifications. Work with counsel to identify everyone who should receive notice and to serve documents in a manner that satisfies court requirements, ensuring that objections are properly recognized and resolved within the proceedings.
The timeline for a trust modification petition depends on the complexity of the issues, the level of notice required, and whether objections arise. Simple, uncontested petitions that proceed with agreement among parties can often be resolved more quickly, whereas contested matters may take months or longer as the parties gather evidence, negotiate, and appear for hearings. Court workloads and procedural schedules also affect timing, with some probate courts having longer docket delays than others. Preparation, organization of supporting documents, and early efforts to resolve disputes can shorten the overall timeline. Engaging counsel early to evaluate options, prepare a focused petition, and address procedural requirements helps avoid delays caused by incomplete filings or improper service, moving the matter toward resolution more efficiently.
Helpful evidence for supporting a trust modification petition includes the original trust document and any drafts or prior versions, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent, contemporaneous notes or memoranda, account statements showing asset transfers into the trust, and declarations from witnesses familiar with the settlor’s wishes. If a drafting error is alleged, earlier drafts or communications that reveal the intended language can be particularly persuasive for a court asked to reform the document. Documentation of changed circumstances, such as medical records, proof of beneficiary incapacity, or financial statements demonstrating changed needs, also supports a petition. Clear, well-organized exhibits and credible witness declarations strengthen the factual record and help the judge understand why the proposed modification is necessary and consistent with the settlor’s probable intent.
Yes, court filings for a trust modification petition generally become part of the public record once filed in probate court. That means details of the petition, supporting exhibits, and the court’s order may be accessible to the public. For concerned parties seeking privacy, pursuing a nonjudicial amendment with beneficiary consent may keep changes out of public filings when the settlor and beneficiaries agree and the law allows it. If privacy is a priority but court involvement is necessary, counsel can advise on strategies to limit sensitive disclosures or to present evidence in ways that respect confidentiality where statutory protections permit. Understanding the public nature of court proceedings helps clients weigh the tradeoffs between privacy and the definitive legal protection a court-ordered modification provides.
Yes, a petition can request removal or replacement of a trustee if valid grounds exist, such as breach of fiduciary duties, incapacity, conflict of interest, or inability to administer the trust effectively. The court evaluates whether removal is in the beneficiaries’ best interests and whether any proposed successor is qualified to assume trustee responsibilities. Removal requests often require careful factual support and consideration of alternatives that might correct administrative problems without immediate replacement. When seeking to change a trustee as part of a modification, the petition should clearly explain the basis for the request and propose an appropriate successor mechanism if removal is warranted. The court ensures that beneficiaries’ interests are protected in the transition and may issue instructions to facilitate a smooth transfer of duties and trust assets to the new trustee.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the probate court will consider their objections and the supporting evidence before deciding. Common objections include claims that the modification contradicts the settlor’s intent, that the proposed changes unfairly disadvantage certain beneficiaries, or that procedural notice requirements were not met. The court evaluates the merits of objections in light of the trust document, factual evidence, and applicable law and may hold a hearing to resolve factual disputes. Objections do not automatically block a modification, but they can extend the timeline and increase the complexity of the case. Resolving disputes through negotiation or mediated settlement can be an effective alternative, and when settlement is not possible, presenting a well-documented petition and persuasive legal arguments at a hearing increases the likelihood of a favorable resolution.
Alternatives to filing a petition include direct amendment by the settlor if competent, written agreements among all beneficiaries to modify the trust, and mediation to resolve differences without court adjudication. These alternatives can preserve privacy, lower costs, and reduce emotional strain when parties can reach consensus. Each nonjudicial option requires careful documentation and compliance with legal formalities to avoid later challenges. When parties cannot agree or when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, alternatives may not be feasible. At that point, filing a petition provides a formal mechanism to address disputes, correct errors, or clarify administration, yielding a court order that trustees can rely upon to carry out the trust’s revised terms with legal certainty.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary depending on the petition’s complexity, whether the matter is contested, and attorney fees. Uncontested matters typically incur lower costs because of reduced preparation time and fewer court appearances, while contested petitions that require significant discovery, witness preparation, and hearings will be more expensive. Court filing fees and potential costs for service of process, expert valuations, or mediator fees also contribute to total expenses. Discussing budget expectations during an initial consultation helps align strategy with available resources. Attorneys can often suggest phased approaches or alternatives to limit costs, such as pursuing settlement negotiations or targeted petitions that address specific issues rather than comprehensive litigation when appropriate.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas