A Heggstad petition can be an important step when estate property was not properly transferred into a trust during the settlor’s lifetime. This guide explains how a Heggstad petition works in Apple Valley and what steps you can take to correct transfers so assets are recognized as trust property. The information that follows covers definitions, common scenarios that prompt a petition, and how a probate court may resolve disputes about whether assets belong to a trust or the estate. If you are facing unclear trust transfers, learning your options early can streamline resolution and reduce delay and cost in settling affairs.
This page is written for residents of Apple Valley and the surrounding San Bernardino County communities who are handling trust administration or estate settlement matters. You will find practical descriptions of when to pursue a Heggstad petition, what documents and evidence are typically required, and the likely timeline for obtaining a court ruling. We also describe alternatives and complementary estate planning tools such as pour-over wills, trust amendment filings, and other filings that can prevent disputes. The goal is to provide clear, usable information so you can make informed choices during a sensitive time.
A Heggstad petition provides a legal pathway to establish that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite lacking formal retitling. Successfully resolving ownership through the petition can prevent assets from going through full probate, preserve privacy, and ensure distributions follow the trust terms. It also helps trustees and beneficiaries avoid prolonged disputes when bank accounts, real property, or retirement accounts were intended for the trust but remain in the decedent’s name. The petition can lead to a court order clarifying title, enabling trustees to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust, which often results in lower cost and faster administration than contested probate.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handles estate planning and trust administration matters with a client-focused approach in California. The firm assists with preparing and filing petitions, assembling supporting documentation, working with financial institutions, and representing trustees or beneficiaries in court when needed. We emphasize clear communication, thorough preparation of pleadings, and practical strategies to document intent and establish trust ownership. Our team guides clients through the procedural steps required by San Bernardino County courts, aiming to resolve title questions as efficiently as possible while protecting client interests and minimizing stress during settlement.
A Heggstad petition is a court petition used in California to declare that property should be treated as trust property even though it is not formally titled to the trust. The petition typically relies on evidence showing the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust, such as transfer documents, trust terms, account applications, or affidavits. The court evaluates such evidence to determine whether constructive trust principles apply or whether the asset should pass under the trust. Understanding the types of evidence and how courts analyze intent is fundamental to preparing a persuasive petition and achieving a favorable ruling.
Not every case will require a petition; sometimes institutions will accept supporting documents and release assets to a trustee without court intervention. When institutions refuse to recognize the trust or multiple parties contest ownership, a Heggstad petition clarifies rights in a judicial setting. The outcome depends on documentation, witness testimony, and the specifics of each transfer. Preparing exhibits, declarations, and an organized chronology of events helps the court reach a decision. Timely action is important to avoid delays in administration and to prevent loss of value through frozen accounts or market fluctuations.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that property should pass under the terms of a trust even when the formal title was not changed. Originating from a California case, the petition focuses on demonstrating that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and took steps indicating that intent. The court considers documents, correspondence, beneficiary designations, and behavior demonstrating intent to fund the trust. The remedy often involves an order directing the institution or county recorder to treat the asset as trust property, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute it according to the trust instrument.
A successful petition requires careful assembly of documentary evidence, sworn declarations, and a clear statement of the sequence of events that show the settlor’s intent. Common elements include the trust document, account applications, transfer attempts, correspondence with banks or title companies, and testimony from witnesses. The petitioner must file the appropriate forms with the probate court, serve interested parties, and respond to any objections. The court may set a hearing, allow discovery, and weigh competing claims before issuing an order. Preparing a thorough record from the outset improves the chances of a prompt resolution.
This glossary clarifies frequent terms encountered when handling a petition about trust funding. Definitions include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, constructive trust, beneficiary designation, and record title. Understanding these concepts helps trustees and beneficiaries recognize why an asset might not appear in the trust but still be intended for it. The glossary also explains common filings and documents requested by courts and institutions during dispute resolution. Knowing the language used in pleadings and court orders reduces confusion and helps you collect the appropriate supporting materials for a petition.
The settlor is the person who created and funded the trust, establishing its terms and naming trustees and beneficiaries. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the settlor’s intent regarding whether a specific asset should be part of the trust is central to the court’s decision. Evidence reflecting the settlor’s actions and statements can include emails, bank forms, trust amendments, and witnesses who observed the settlor’s attempts to transfer property. Understanding the settlor’s role helps clarify why certain assets may be disputed and whether those assets belong to the trust or the decedent’s probate estate.
A constructive trust is an equitable remedy a court may impose when it finds it would be unjust for a party to retain property that was intended for someone else. In Heggstad petition matters, a constructive trust rationale supports treating an asset as trust property when formal title was not transferred but the settlor’s intent is clear. The court may use this concept to order an institution to recognize the trust’s interest or to direct distribution according to the trust terms. The remedy focuses on fairness and the settlor’s documented intentions rather than strict title rules.
The trustee is the individual or entity charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms for the benefit of named beneficiaries. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee typically petitions the court to declare that certain assets are trust property so they can be administered without probate. Trustees are responsible for gathering evidence, submitting declarations, and making lawful distributions after a court decision. The trustee must act in good faith, following the trust terms and applicable California law while protecting beneficiaries’ interests during resolution of contested title issues.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets not already placed into a trust at the time of death into that trust. When assets remain outside the trust, a pour-over will can direct them to the trust through probate, providing a safety net for incomplete funding. While a pour-over will can transfer assets to a trust after probate, a Heggstad petition seeks recognition that an asset was intended for the trust and should be treated as trust property without probate. These tools often work together to ensure assets follow the settlor’s overall estate plan.
When a bank or title company refuses to honor a trustee’s claim, you can pursue a Heggstad petition, probate administration, or seek an informal resolution. Informal resolution may involve additional documentation and negotiation with institutions, which can be faster and less costly. Probate can be lengthy and public but will transfer assets according to a will or state law when a petition is not successful. A petition can preserve privacy and honor trust terms when evidence of intent is strong. Choosing the right route depends on the assets involved, the availability of documentation, the level of disagreement among parties, and your tolerance for time and expense.
A limited approach can work if you can provide convincing documentation showing the settlor intended the asset to be in the trust, and the financial institution or title company accepts that evidence. Examples include account change forms, signed applications naming the trust, or correspondence showing clear intent. When institutions cooperate after reviewing these materials, trustees may secure access or retitling without court involvement. This route is often faster, less expensive, and preserves privacy, but it relies on the institution’s willingness to accept informal proof and abide by the settlor’s documented preferences.
If there are no competing heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors contesting ownership, and the trustee has clear records, institutions may comply with requests to transfer or release assets. In such situations the trustee can complete required forms, provide a copy of the trust, and submit declarations demonstrating intent, enabling a straightforward transfer. This path minimizes court costs and avoids public filings. However, trustees should ensure they have solid supporting records because a later dispute could reopen the matter and require formal judicial resolution in probate court.
When financial institutions or the county recorder refuse to honor transfer requests, or when title issues involve real property with complex encumbrances, a comprehensive legal approach is often required. Preparing and filing a Heggstad petition provides a judicial mechanism to resolve disputes when other remedies fail. This process typically involves collecting detailed evidence, drafting legal pleadings tailored to local court rules, serving interested parties, and presenting the matter at a hearing. Given the formalities and potential opposition, effective advocacy helps present a compelling record to the court and secure a clear order.
When multiple heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors assert competing claims to an asset, a Heggstad petition may be the only reliable way to establish trust ownership and prevent later challenges. The court process provides fact-finding tools and procedures to adjudicate disputes, including discovery, declarations, and testimony. A comprehensive approach helps ensure every interested party is properly notified and that the court receives a complete evidentiary record for its ruling. This approach reduces the risk of future litigation over the same asset and clarifies distribution pathways under the trust.
A comprehensive judicial approach secures a binding court order that confirms whether an asset belongs to a trust, reducing uncertainty and the risk of future claims. The order provides legal certainty for trustees to manage, sell, or distribute assets in accordance with the trust document. It also protects trustees from personal exposure by clarifying authority and limits when institutions require judicial direction. While court proceedings involve time and expense, they can prevent protracted disputes and repeated challenges, saving resources in the long run and ensuring the settlor’s wishes are carried out with legal backing.
Another benefit of the formal route is the structured process for addressing objections and allowing full consideration of the factual record. The court can weigh competing evidence, order necessary relief, and issue a definitive decree that institutions must follow. This reduces administrative friction and protects beneficiaries’ interests through an enforceable order. For trustees, obtaining clear judicial direction makes it easier to act confidently, comply with fiduciary duties, and facilitate final distribution of estate assets according to the trust terms under California law.
A court order resolving whether specific property is trust property minimizes the chance of future litigation by creating an enforceable determination. This certainty helps trustees complete administration and beneficiaries receive distributions without repeated objections. It also clarifies obligations for institutions and third parties, reducing administrative delays and disputes about title. By addressing contested claims through the judicial system, interested parties obtain an impartial decision based on the record, which supports orderly settlement and reduces legal exposure that can arise from ambiguous ownership or incomplete funding of trusts.
Obtaining a judicial determination gives trustees protection from allegations of wrongful distribution because the court clarifies authority and ownership. Beneficiaries gain confidence that transfers and distributions comply with the trust’s terms and judicial guidance. The formal process also helps identify and resolve competing creditor claims or other encumbrances that might otherwise jeopardize distributions. By securing a clear court order, trustees manage assets with reduced personal risk and beneficiaries benefit from an enforceable resolution that respects the settlor’s intent while following California probate procedures.
Collecting the right documents early can make a major difference. Look for the trust instrument, signed change forms, account or deed applications that reference the trust, and any correspondence indicating the settlor’s intention to fund the trust. Affidavits from individuals who helped the settlor with transfers or who witnessed intent can strengthen your record. Create a chronological summary of events showing when and how attempts to transfer assets occurred. Presenting a well-organized packet to a financial institution or the court often leads to faster recognition of the trust’s interest and reduces the need for extended litigation.
If the informal path fails, be ready to move forward with a petition. Assemble declarations, exhibits, and a concise statement of facts that tell a clear story of the settlor’s intent. Expect the need to serve notice on interested parties and to comply with local probate rules. Prepare witnesses and documentation for a hearing. Keep in mind court timelines and potential discovery requests. A thorough, methodical approach improves the likelihood of a favorable ruling and reduces the chance of procedural delays that can prolong administration and increase cost.
Consider a petition when assets intended for a trust were never retitled and the institution holding the assets refuses to transfer them. The petition is appropriate when you have evidence of the settlor’s intent and need a binding court order to clarify ownership. It is also appropriate if conflicting claims arise among heirs or beneficiaries that cannot be resolved through discussion. Filing a petition can prevent asset loss or delay, protect the interests of beneficiaries, and provide trustees with the authority to manage or distribute disputed property under the trust terms in a legally enforceable manner.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to avoid broader probate proceedings that can be more time-consuming and public. When the evidence supports trust ownership, a Heggstad petition often allows assets to be treated consistently with the trust, preserving privacy and following the settlor’s intentions. It is also useful when clarity is needed before a sale, transfer, or distribution of property to ensure institutions will act on the trustee’s instructions. Timely action reduces administrative friction and supports orderly estate settlement that respects the settlor’s planning goals.
Typical scenarios include bank accounts opened in the settlor’s name rather than the trust, deeds or real property left in the decedent’s name, or retirement accounts with beneficiary designations that create ambiguity. Other situations involve transfers in process that were never finalized, or institutions refusing to accept evidence of intent without a court order. Disputes often arise when family members have differing understandings of the settlor’s wishes. Identifying these circumstances early and documenting what steps were taken toward funding helps determine whether a petition is the proper remedy.
Bank and brokerage accounts are frequently overlooked during trust funding, leaving them in the decedent’s name. When a bank refuses to honor the trustee’s request to release or retitle these accounts, the trustee may need to file a petition to establish the accounts as trust property. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent with account applications, correspondence, and declarations can persuade a court. Resolving these matters promptly avoids prolonged account freezes, potential fees, and complications in distributing assets to beneficiaries under the trust terms.
Real property intended for a trust but still recorded in the decedent’s name creates title issues that can prevent sale or distribution. A Heggstad petition or related petition to quiet title may be necessary to establish the trust’s interest and permit recordation of a deed or transfer. Evidence such as a declaration from the settlor or prior conveyance attempts, payment records demonstrating intent, and the trust document itself supports the petition. Resolving real estate title questions avoids delays in administration and potential conflicts among heirs.
Sometimes retirement or annuity accounts have beneficiary designations that conflict with trust planning or were not updated before death. In such cases, a petition may clarify whether the asset should pass under the trust or to named beneficiaries outside it. The court will examine the designation forms, trust provisions, and any evidence of the settlor’s intent to determine the proper path for the asset. Addressing these conflicts through the proper legal channels helps prevent contested distributions and ensures assets are allocated in line with the settlor’s overall plan.
If you are in Apple Valley or nearby San Bernardino County communities and confronting a funding dispute, local representation can assist with preparing filings, communicating with institutions, and presenting the petition to the probate court. A knowledgeable local attorney can explain county-specific filing practices, anticipated timelines, and the documents typically requested by local judges. Working with counsel familiar with regional court procedures reduces surprises, helps meet procedural requirements, and supports more efficient resolution of ownership questions so trustees and beneficiaries can move forward with trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused attention to trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions, pour-over wills, and trust modification filings. We prioritize thorough preparation, clear communication with clients and institutions, and practical strategies to document intent and present orderly evidence to the court. Our approach aims to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting trustee and beneficiary interests. We help assemble necessary records, draft declarations, and guide you through the notice and hearing process so you understand each step and can make informed decisions throughout the matter.
Clients receive support in organizing the factual record that a court will evaluate, including assembling relevant documents and preparing witness statements. We assist in negotiating with banks and title companies where appropriate, while remaining ready to file a petition when negotiation is unsuccessful. Our goal is to limit public court intervention when possible, and obtain authoritative resolution when needed. By handling procedural requirements and court filings, we allow trustees and families to focus on settlement matters and minimizing disruptions during a difficult time.
When contested claims arise, we represent trustees or beneficiaries through the entire process, from initial assessment to resolution. We explain your options, potential risks, and reasonable timelines so you can choose a path aligned with your priorities. Whether the matter resolves through cooperation with institutions or requires a court order, we advocate for timely resolution that honors the settlor’s intentions while safeguarding client interests and complying with California procedures for trust administration and probate matters.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to identify the asset, review the trust and related documents, and determine whether sufficient evidence exists to pursue a petition. We gather account records, deeds, correspondence, and witness statements, then prepare the necessary petitions and notices. If institutions will not cooperate, we file with the probate court, serve interested parties, and represent you at hearings. Throughout the process we maintain communication about options and potential outcomes, aiming to resolve ownership questions efficiently and in a way that supports final trust administration and distribution.
The first step is a thorough review of the trust and all related documents to determine whether a petition is appropriate. This includes examining account titles, deeds, beneficiary designations, prior transfer attempts, and any correspondence with institutions. We prepare a detailed chronology and request additional records as needed. Establishing a clear timeline and gathering persuasive evidence is essential before proceeding, as the strength of the petition often turns on the completeness and organization of the supporting materials submitted to the court.
During an initial interview, we identify the asset type, how title currently appears, and what steps the settlor took toward funding the trust. We evaluate witness availability and any written records that support intent. This early assessment helps estimate the likelihood of informal resolution and the probable scope of court filings if needed. We also provide guidance on interim steps trustees should take to protect assets while the matter is resolved, such as notifying institutions and preserving correspondence that may later serve as evidence.
We assist in collecting the trust document, account statements, deeds, and any signed forms referencing the trust. Declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s intent and from the trustee explaining the circumstances of the transfer are prepared to support the petition. Organizing exhibits and drafting clear, factual declarations streamlines the filing process and enhances the clarity of the arguments presented to the court. This stage lays the groundwork for an efficient filing and helps identify any gaps in the evidentiary record that must be addressed.
Once the record is prepared, we file the petition with the appropriate probate court and ensure all interested parties receive formal notice. Proper service and filing are essential to avoid procedural challenges that could delay the matter. We prepare supporting exhibits, a concise statement of facts, and proposed orders for the court. Timely and correct service on beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors gives the court the necessary jurisdiction to hear the dispute and issue an enforceable ruling.
Drafting the petition requires a clear narrative supported by exhibits and declarations. We focus on presenting the settlor’s intent through a logical chronology of events and documents. Exhibits typically include the trust, account forms, correspondence with institutions, and witness declarations. A well-drafted petition anticipates potential objections and addresses them with factual support, which assists the judge in evaluating the merits of the request and streamlines consideration at the hearing.
After filing, we handle service of the petition on all required parties and monitor any responses or objections. If parties object, we address procedural or substantive issues through declarations, limited discovery, or negotiation as appropriate. Maintaining open lines of communication and responding promptly to court deadlines reduces the risk of delay. When objections are raised, we evaluate whether settlement is possible or whether the matter should proceed to a contested hearing to obtain a definitive court ruling.
The court will schedule a hearing to evaluate the petition and any objections. We prepare witness testimony, written declarations, and targeted exhibits to present a compelling record in support of trust ownership. The judge reviews the evidence and may issue an order granting the requested relief, which directs institutions or county recorders to treat the asset as trust property. If further proceedings are necessary, the court may order discovery or additional briefing. Our aim is to achieve a clear resolution that allows trustees to proceed with administration.
At the hearing, the court assesses the documentary record and witness testimony to determine whether the asset should be treated as part of the trust. We organize evidence to clearly demonstrate the settlor’s intent and the sequence of events surrounding attempted transfers. Clear, concise presentations and factual declarations help the judge understand why the petition is merited. The court’s decision is based on the weight of evidence and legal standards, and a well-prepared presentation can lead to an efficient ruling that confirms trust ownership.
If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order that trustees can present to financial institutions or county recorders to retitle or release assets. We assist in implementing the order by coordinating with institutions, recording deeds if necessary, and ensuring distributions comply with the trust’s terms. When additional steps are necessary, we follow up to enforce the order. This ensures the court’s determination is translated into practical action so assets can be administered and distributed according to the settlor’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain property should be treated as trust property even though the formal title was never changed to the trust. The petition relies on evidence indicating the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust, such as signed trust documents, account or deed forms referencing the trust, correspondence with financial institutions, and witness statements. The court evaluates the facts to determine whether the asset should be administered under the trust terms rather than through probate. A successful petition results in an order clarifying ownership and directing institutions to honor the trust. The remedy is particularly useful when institutions refuse to cooperate or when conflicting claims arise among heirs or beneficiaries. The order obtained through a Heggstad petition is enforceable and can be used to retitle assets, release funds, or otherwise effectuate the settlor’s intent. While a petition involves court proceedings and formal notice to interested parties, it often avoids the more expansive procedures of full probate administration and can provide legal certainty that supports final trust distribution.
Informal resolution is often worthwhile as an initial step because it can be faster, less expensive, and preserves privacy. Start by presenting the trust document, account forms, and any correspondence showing intent to the financial institution or title company. If the institution accepts the materials and agrees to release or retitle assets, court intervention may be unnecessary. Keeping meticulous records of communications and any written refusals helps determine whether escalation to a petition is required. Filing a petition becomes appropriate when institutions refuse to recognize the trust despite persuasive documentation, or when competing claims among heirs or creditors cannot be resolved through negotiation. In such cases a petition provides a judicial determination that can compel institutions to act and protect trustees from future challenges. The decision to proceed should weigh the strength of evidence, potential costs, and the desire for a definitive court order.
The most persuasive documents are the trust instrument itself, any executed change forms or account applications that reference the trust, deeds, and correspondence with banks or title companies showing attempts to transfer the assets. Declarations from individuals who assisted the settlor with transfers or who observed statements of intent can also be powerful. A clear chronology of events, payment records, and any evidence of ongoing management of the asset in a manner consistent with trust ownership strengthen the case. Institutional records showing attempts to retitle or communications requesting recognition of the trust are especially helpful because they show both intent and action. Photocopies of signed applications, escrow instructions, and settlement statements that mention the trust provide tangible support. Organizing these exhibits and pairing them with concise, factual declarations increases the likelihood that a court will find the evidence credible and rule in favor of treating the asset as trust property.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not automatically convert the entire estate into a probate administration, but it does involve the probate court and public filings in the probate docket. The petition focuses on a specific asset or set of assets and seeks a judicial declaration that those assets belong to the trust. This is a limited, targeted remedy designed to address title or ownership disputes without opening a full probate estate for all assets. However, if the court finds that other assets are similarly affected or if creditor claims surface that require broader administration, additional probate proceedings could follow. The petition itself aims to avoid expansive probate whenever possible by securing an order that directly addresses disputed property and allows trustees to continue administration under the trust terms for unaffected assets.
Timing varies based on the complexity of the issues, whether institutions respond cooperatively, and the court’s schedule. If institutions cooperate and no objections arise, an informal resolution may take just weeks. When a petition is necessary, expect several months for preparation, filing, service, and a hearing, though contested matters can extend longer. San Bernardino County court schedules and local procedural requirements influence the timeline, and additional discovery or briefing can add time. Factors that lengthen the process include multiple interested parties, the need for discovery, contested factual issues, and backlog in the probate department. Early organization of documents and prompt service on interested parties help streamline the process. Communicating clearly with the court clerk about local practices and adhering to filing rules can also reduce avoidable delays and move the matter toward resolution more efficiently.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition by filing objections or opposing declarations. Contests commonly challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, claim contrary beneficiary designations, or argue that the asset should pass through probate. When objections arise, the court provides a process for evaluating the competing evidence, which may include declarations, discovery, and testimony at a hearing. Preparing for possible opposition by anticipating objections and assembling a robust record improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome. If objections are raised, parties may negotiate a settlement or proceed to a contested hearing where the judge will weigh the evidence. The court’s focus is on the settlor’s intent and whether equity supports treating the asset as trust property. Effective organization of documentary proof and clear factual declarations are key to overcoming objections and securing a binding judicial determination.
Costs vary by case complexity, the need for court appearances, and whether the matter is contested. Informal resolutions typically incur lower costs, mainly administrative and communication expenses. Filing a petition involves court filing fees, service costs, and legal fees for preparing pleadings, declarations, and exhibits. If the petition is contested, additional expenses for discovery, hearings, and possibly expert declarations may arise. The total cost should be weighed against the value of the asset in dispute and the benefit of obtaining a binding court order. Many clients find that when the disputed asset has significant value or when institutional refusal would otherwise force probate, the petition cost is justified by the clarity and finality it provides. Discussing fee arrangements and anticipated costs at the outset helps clients make informed decisions about whether to pursue a judicial route versus negotiation or probate alternatives.
Yes, Heggstad petitions can address real property when deeds or title records remain in the decedent’s name despite an intent to include the property in the trust. The petition may request a court order recognizing the trust’s interest and directing recordation of a deed or other corrective measures. Supporting evidence often includes the trust document, deeds or transfer attempts, payment records such as mortgage or tax payments made from trust accounts, and declarations showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust with the property. Resolving real property title through a petition can remove obstacles to sale, refinancing, or distribution. Because real estate can have encumbrances or require county recording, courts often require clear evidence and may order additional steps to protect third-party interests. Properly prepared pleadings and exhibits tailored to local recording practices help achieve a successful outcome and ensure the title is clarified for future transactions.
While a petition is pending, trustees should preserve all relevant records and communications, avoid unauthorized distributions, and follow any interim court orders. Keep detailed logs of contacts with institutions and notify beneficiaries and interested parties as appropriate. Maintaining transparency and careful record-keeping protects trustees and supports the evidentiary record that the court will review. It is also prudent to consult counsel before taking actions that could be challenged, such as transferring disputed assets or making final distributions. Trustees may sometimes be able to take limited protective steps, such as depositing funds into a blocked account or obtaining temporary clarification from an institution based on submitted documents. However, it is important to act cautiously and rely on legal advice to avoid complications. Properly managed interim conduct helps preserve asset value and demonstrates good faith while the court considers the petition.
You can reach the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman by calling 408-528-2827 to schedule a consultation about potential Heggstad petition matters. An initial conversation helps determine whether informal resolution is feasible or whether filing a petition is advisable, and allows us to explain likely timelines and document needs. We provide clear guidance on next steps and assist with assembling the evidence needed for institutions or the probate court. If you prefer, you can also contact the office through the website to request an appointment or to send preliminary documents for review. Early assessment of the trust, related records, and the asset in question helps identify the most efficient path forward and informs a practical plan for resolution tailored to your circumstances.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas