A general assignment of assets to a trust is a document that transfers ownership of specified property into an existing trust, helping simplify estate administration and reduce the need for probate. For residents of Big Bear Lake and surrounding San Bernardino County communities, this tool can be an effective component of a full estate plan. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our approach focuses on clear documentation, careful review of asset titles and beneficiary designations, and coordination with other estate planning instruments like pour-over wills and beneficiary forms. Properly drafted assignments help ensure assets flow according to the trust maker’s intentions while avoiding unintended tax or transfer problems.
This page explains when a general assignment is appropriate, how it works together with a revocable living trust and other documents, and what to expect when transferring assets into trust ownership. Many clients find that a general assignment is especially helpful for personal property, household goods, or accounts that are not easily retitled through a formal deed or transfer. We discuss the interplay between trust administration and probate avoidance, common drafting issues to watch for, and practical steps to complete assignments for real estate, bank and investment accounts, vehicles, and digital assets, with attention to California law and local filing considerations.
A properly executed general assignment helps ensure that specific assets are owned by the trust during the trust maker’s lifetime or at death, supporting a smoother transition to named beneficiaries and reducing the scope of probate. Benefits include greater privacy because trust distributions typically avoid public probate records, potentially faster asset distribution to heirs, and clearer title for assets included in the trust. Assignments can also reduce administrative burdens for trustees by centralizing property under trust ownership. While not a universal solution, the general assignment is a useful tool for items that are difficult to retitle and for aligning asset ownership with broader estate planning goals in California.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has provided estate planning guidance to California residents with an emphasis on clarity, personalized planning, and thorough document drafting. Serving clients in Big Bear Lake and across San Bernardino County, our work covers revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, financial powers of attorney, health care directives, trust funding including general assignments, and post-death trust administration. We prioritize plain-language explanations, careful review of asset records, and practical recommendations to minimize disputes and ease administration. Our goal is to help clients put practical and legally sound arrangements in place that reflect their wishes and family circumstances.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a standalone document or clause that transfers ownership of certain personally owned property into the trust. It typically lists or describes the assets being assigned and includes language that conveys the owner’s intent to transfer those items to the trust. In California, assignments are used for assets that may not be easily retitled by new deeds or account forms, such as tangible personal property, certain business interests, or miscellaneous accounts. The assignment works alongside a trust agreement and other estate planning documents to create a unified plan for asset management and distribution.
Assignments should be tailored to the individual client and the types of assets involved. A plain assignment may be ideal for household items, collections, and intangible assets that do not require formal deeds, but some assets like real estate typically require separate deeds to change title. The assignment document should be consistent with beneficiary designations and account titles to avoid conflicting claims. It is advisable to maintain an updated schedule of assigned assets and to review and update assignments whenever major life changes occur, such as marriage, divorce, or significant acquisitions or dispositions of property.
A general assignment is a written instrument conveying ownership of property from an individual to a trust. It often includes a description of the assets and language indicating that the transfer is made to the individual’s revocable living trust. The document provides a practical method for funding a trust with items that are not subject to deed transfers or beneficiary designations. Typically used for personal effects, furniture, certain accounts, and intangible items, a general assignment complements deeds, assignments of bank accounts, and retitling actions that formally place property in the trust’s name under California law.
A solid general assignment includes clear identification of the trust maker, the trust name and date, a precise description or schedule of assigned assets, and language expressing intent to transfer ownership into the trust. Signature and notarization are often required to meet evidentiary needs. The process typically involves inventorying assets, verifying current ownership and title, preparing the assignment document, and filing or delivering the assignment where appropriate. It is also important to update related documents such as beneficiary forms, vehicle titles, and account registrations so records consistently reflect the trust’s ownership where required.
Understanding common terms helps clients make informed decisions. Terms include revocable living trust, settlor or trust maker, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, retitling, and assignment. Each has a specific role within the estate planning process: the revocable trust holds property, the trustee manages assets for beneficiaries, and documents like assignments and pour-over wills ensure assets move into the trust. A basic glossary clarifies whether an asset can be assigned or whether a formal deed or beneficiary designation is necessary. Careful attention to terminology reduces confusion when funding a trust and administering the estate.
A revocable living trust is a trust created during an individual’s lifetime that can be amended or revoked by the trust maker. The trust holds assets for the benefit of named beneficiaries and is managed by a trustee. It commonly serves to avoid probate for trust-owned assets and to provide for ongoing management in the event of incapacity. The trust agreement outlines distribution instructions, successor trustee powers, and terms for administration. Funding the trust through deeds and assignments is essential for the trust to fulfill its intended role in an estate plan under California rules.
A pour-over will is a will that directs any assets remaining in the individual’s name at death to be transferred, or poured over, into their trust so the trust provisions govern distribution. It acts as a safety net for assets not previously moved into the trust by deeds or assignments. Although property passing via a pour-over will may still go through probate, the will ensures those assets ultimately become part of the trust. Combining a pour-over will with complete trust funding, including general assignments, helps achieve a more seamless estate administration overall.
An assignment of assets is a document that transfers ownership or title of certain property from an individual to another entity, such as a trust. A general assignment specifically moves a range of personal or intangible assets into the trust without requiring a separate deed for each item. It should identify the trust by name and date and describe the assets being assigned. Proper execution, including signatures and notary acknowledgment where appropriate, helps ensure clear evidence of the transfer and better alignment with the comprehensive estate plan.
A certification of trust is a concise document that provides key information about a trust—such as its existence, trustee authority, and signature requirements—without revealing the trust’s detailed terms. It is often used when institutions request proof that someone has authority to manage or transfer trust assets. The certification helps facilitate transactions like retitling accounts or confirming trustee powers while maintaining privacy for the trust agreement’s contents. When combined with assignments and properly titled assets, the certification supports efficient trust administration and asset management.
When funding a trust, individuals can choose between specific deeds and retitling, beneficiary designations, and general assignments. Each option has advantages depending on the asset type. Real estate usually requires a deed recorded in the county to change title. Bank or retirement accounts often change ownership through beneficiary forms or payable-on-death designations. A general assignment fills the gap for items that are burdensome to retitle individually. Considerations include document formality, recording requirements, privacy implications, and whether a transfer changes tax treatment or creditor exposure under California law.
A limited approach to trust funding can be appropriate for individuals who own only a small number of assets with simple ownership structures. If assets are primarily bank accounts and retirement plans with beneficiary designations already in place, the trust maker may only need minimal retitling and an assignment for personal property. A targeted funding approach can reduce upfront time and expense while addressing the most important ownership issues. It is still important to ensure that beneficiary designations and account titles align with the overall estate plan to avoid unexpected outcomes at the time of incapacity or death.
Some people have estates unlikely to trigger complex probate proceedings because the total asset value is modest or assets pass by beneficiary designation. In these situations, a narrow funding plan combined with a pour-over will and a general assignment for tangible personal property may be sufficient. The decision to take a limited approach should consider potential future changes such as acquiring real estate or business interests. Periodic review is recommended to ensure that the estate plan remains effective as circumstances evolve and that the general assignment continues to reflect the trust maker’s wishes.
A comprehensive funding strategy is advisable when the estate includes multiple real properties, business interests, or mixed ownership arrangements that require deeds, assignments, or partnership documents to be updated. Proper retitling of real estate, thorough review of account beneficiary designations, and careful documentation of transfers for business interests help avoid unintended consequences, delays, and disputes. A full approach also considers tax planning, creditor exposure, and successor trustee powers so that assets pass and are managed according to the trust maker’s long-term intentions.
When family dynamics, blended families, or potential creditor claims exist, a comprehensive approach to funding and documentation can reduce ambiguity and minimize the potential for contest or litigation. Clear assignments, updated deeds, and consistent beneficiary forms reinforce the trust maker’s plan and provide a documented trail for trustees and beneficiaries. Thoughtful coordination of asset transfers with trust provisions and successor trustee instructions supports smoother administration and reduces the likelihood of costly disagreements or delays in distributing assets after incapacity or death.
Fully funding a trust by retitling assets and using assignments where appropriate provides greater assurance that the trust’s terms will govern asset distribution without court involvement. A comprehensive plan reduces uncertainty for beneficiaries, streamlines administration for successor trustees, and can preserve privacy by minimizing probate filings. It also makes it easier to manage assets in the event of incapacity because trustee authority and documentation are in place. Overall, thorough funding supports predictability and efficiency in the trust administration process under California law.
A complete funding approach also helps prevent unintended transfers or gaps in ownership that could cause assets to pass under default intestacy rules rather than the trust’s provisions. By coordinating deeds, account registrations, beneficiary forms, and general assignments, the trust maker clarifies how property should be handled and who should manage or receive assets. This clarity reduces administrative burdens, lowers the risk of disputes, and can provide peace of mind knowing the estate plan has been implemented consistently across varied asset types.
Placing assets into a trust via deed, account retitling, or assignment reduces the portion of the estate that must pass through probate court. Probates can be time-consuming, public, and sometimes expensive, depending on estate size and complexity. When assets are properly held by the trust, successor trustees can often distribute property directly to beneficiaries without court oversight. This reduces delays, preserves privacy, and can lower administrative costs. Ensuring assignments are clearly documented and consistent with other estate planning instruments helps reinforce the avoidance of probate for those assets.
A fully funded trust creates a clear structure for how assets are managed and distributed, including contingency plans if a trustee is unable to serve. By consolidating ownership within the trust and documenting assignments, there is less uncertainty about who should control or receive property after incapacity or death. This clarity supports continuity of asset management, helps trustees carry out fiduciary duties, and reduces disputes among beneficiaries. Effective funding therefore simplifies administration and helps ensure the trust maker’s wishes are carried out consistently.
Begin the funding process by compiling a comprehensive inventory of all assets, including real property, bank and investment accounts, vehicles, digital accounts, jewelry, collections, and business interests. A thorough inventory clarifies what can be retitled, what requires deeds or beneficiary updates, and which items are best moved by general assignment. Maintain current account numbers, titles, and contact information for institutions so transitions are smoother. Regular inventory updates help ensure that new acquisitions are considered for assignment or retitling and keep the estate plan aligned with the client’s current holdings.
Retain copies of all assignment documents, deeds, account change forms, and certifications of trust in a secure but accessible location. Provide successor trustees with a clear statement of where records are kept and how to access them when needed. Revisit assignments and account titles after major life events like marriage, divorce, property purchases, or the birth of a child to ensure the estate plan remains accurate. Periodic reviews help catch overlooked assets and reduce the likelihood of unintended outcomes when the trust is administered.
A general assignment is often a practical solution when you want to move personal belongings and intangible assets into your trust without the need for numerous separate deeds or filings. It simplifies the process of consolidating ownership under the trust and can complement a broader funding strategy that includes deeds for real property and beneficiary designations for financial accounts. Clients choose assignments to reduce future administrative burdens and to make it easier for successor trustees to locate and manage trust property according to the trust’s terms.
Another compelling reason to use an assignment is privacy. Assets owned by a trust commonly avoid public probate proceedings, which can protect sensitive family and financial information. In addition, a carefully drafted assignment can provide clear evidence of the trust maker’s intent for specific items, reducing the chance of confusion or dispute among heirs. When combined with a certification of trust and properly updated account records, general assignments support smoother transitions and more predictable administration for the trust’s beneficiaries.
General assignments are useful when transferring household goods, art collections, family heirlooms, and other personal property that would be impractical to retitle individually. They are also appropriate for intangible assets without a clear title transfer mechanism and for any items the trust maker wishes to consolidate under trust ownership. Assignments can serve as a catch-all during trust funding, ensuring that miscellaneous assets are documented as trust property and reducing the likelihood of estate administration delays or disagreements about ownership after a trust maker’s incapacity or death.
Household items, jewelry, artwork, and personal collections often lack formal title documentation and are therefore good candidates for inclusion via a general assignment. Documenting these assets in an assignment clarifies that the trust holds them and provides a record for successor trustees and beneficiaries. A detailed schedule or description within the assignment can help avoid disputes and make administration smoother. Periodic updates ensure the assignment reflects newly acquired items or changes in personal property ownership.
Certain intangible assets, such as online accounts, business goodwill, or minor brokerage accounts, may not have a straightforward mechanism for retitling. A general assignment can record the trust maker’s intention that such assets be held by the trust. To the extent institutions require additional proof, a certification of trust or direct coordination with the account holder may be necessary. Including clear instructions within the assignment helps successor trustees understand the asset’s status and the trust maker’s wishes for its management.
When assets are in transition, such as recently acquired property awaiting formal retitling or items that will later be assigned to beneficiaries, a general assignment can document interim trust ownership. This is helpful for situations where immediate transfer by deed or account change is impractical. By recording the trust maker’s present intent, the assignment aids continuity and reduces ambiguity for trustees and beneficiaries during the transition period. It is important to follow up with formal retitling where required for long-term clarity.
Residents of Big Bear Lake and San Bernardino County can access support for drafting and implementing general assignments as part of a comprehensive estate plan. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical document preparation, coordination with financial institutions, and guidance on how assignments interact with deeds, beneficiary forms, and trust administration. Our work aims to make the trust funding process straightforward and to help clients document their intentions clearly so trustees can manage and distribute assets in accordance with the trust maker’s plan without unnecessary delays or disputes.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because of our practical approach to estate planning and trust funding. We focus on clear documentation, consistent record-keeping, and coordination with the necessary institutions to implement assignments and retitling. Our goal is to reduce uncertainty for families and successor trustees by ensuring assignments and related documents work together to achieve the client’s objectives. We emphasize straightforward communication so clients understand the steps involved and the implications for their estate plans in California.
We help clients compile inventories, prepare assignment forms tailored to their holdings, and advise on when a deed, beneficiary designation, or assignment is the appropriate tool. For assets that require interaction with county recorders or financial institutions, we outline the documentation those entities typically request and help clients assemble the necessary certifications of trust or authorizations. Our process includes follow-up recommendations to keep records current and to incorporate changes resulting from life events such as property purchases or family changes.
The firm also assists with related estate planning documents that complement assignments, such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and advance health care directives. By delivering an integrated plan, we help clients ensure that the trust will function as intended and that there is a practical path for successor trustees to follow. Our focus on thorough, coordinated planning supports smoother administration and greater clarity for heirs and fiduciaries after incapacity or death.
Our process begins with an intake meeting to review the trust document, current asset titles, and beneficiary forms. We then prepare a recommended funding plan that identifies which assets should be retitled, which require deeds, and which can be included via a general assignment. After client approval, we draft the assignment and related documents, arrange for signature and notarization, and assist with submitting documentation to institutions or recording offices as needed. We provide guidance for record retention and follow-up reviews to keep the trust funding up to date.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the client’s existing estate plan and a detailed inventory of assets. This includes identifying real property, accounts, titles, vehicles, collectibles, and other items that may be transferred into the trust. The review highlights assets that require formal deeds, those suited to beneficiary designations, and items appropriate for a general assignment. Gathering accurate documentation and account information at this stage reduces delays and ensures that the subsequent drafting and transfer steps are efficient and well coordinated.
We collect trust agreements, deeds, account statements, vehicle titles, policy documents, and any trust-related forms. This documentation allows us to verify current ownership, beneficiary designations, and any liens or encumbrances that could affect transfer. We also note any mismatches between account registrations and the trust that require attention. Clear organization of documents at the outset helps ensure that assignments and retitling actions are accurate and that institutions have the paperwork they need to process changes.
After gathering documents, we categorize assets by the required transfer method. Real estate is flagged for deed transfer and county recording; retirement accounts and life insurance are flagged for beneficiary review; bank accounts are reviewed for payable-on-death designations; and personal property is assessed for assignment. This categorization guides the funding plan and clarifies which steps must be completed to align ownership with the trust. The outcome is a prioritized checklist for funding actions and recommended documentation for each asset type.
With the inventory and categorization complete, we draft the general assignment and any necessary deed language, beneficiary guidance, or certifications of trust. The assignment describes the assets being transferred and identifies the trust by name and date. We ensure the language is consistent across all documents and recommend notarization where appropriate. Once prepared, the documents are signed by the trust maker and witnessed or notarized as required, and we provide instructions for delivering or recording the documents with institutions or county offices.
Drafting the assignment involves clear statements of intent, identification of the trust and trust maker, and descriptions or schedules of the assets. The language used ensures the transfer effect is consistent with the trust instrument and avoids ambiguity that could complicate administration. Where an asset description is lengthy, an attached schedule may be used. We also prepare suggested cover letters or transmittal forms for financial institutions to accompany the assignment and certification of trust where necessary to confirm trustee authority.
After execution, we help coordinate with banks, brokers, and other institutions to effectuate the transfer where possible, provide certifications of trust, and address any institution-specific requirements. For assets requiring recording, such as deeds, we prepare the necessary forms and facilitate county recording. Our goal is to reduce back-and-forth with institutions by anticipating documentation needs and providing clear submissions that memorialize the transfer into the trust.
Following the transfers and recordings, we confirm that records reflect trust ownership where applicable and provide clients with a consolidated file of executed documents. We advise on safe storage and recommend periodic reviews so newly acquired assets are addressed. We also discuss successor trustee access to documents and suggest practical methods to inform trustees about the location of important records. Ongoing maintenance helps ensure that the trust remains the controlling instrument for trust-owned property going forward.
We obtain confirmations from institutions and recording offices when transfers are complete and provide the client with proof that assets are accepted as trust property. These confirmations are important for trustees who later manage or distribute assets. If any institution declines to recognize the assignment, we discuss next steps and alternatives to achieve the trust maker’s goals, such as different transfer mechanisms or updated documentation to satisfy institutional requirements.
We recommend periodic reviews at major life milestones or every few years to ensure that new assets are included and that beneficiary designations remain consistent with the trust. During reviews we update assignments, retitle property as needed, and refresh the inventory. Regular maintenance reduces the chance that important assets remain outside the trust and helps maintain a coherent estate plan that reflects the trust maker’s current circumstances and intentions.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a written instrument that transfers ownership of specified personal property and certain intangible assets into an existing trust. Unlike a deed, which is a formal transfer document typically required for real property and must often be recorded with the county, an assignment can be used for items that lack formal title or for smaller holdings where recordation is not required. The assignment identifies the trust, lists or describes the assets being transferred, and states the trust maker’s intent to place those assets into the trust. It complements deeds and other transfer methods to achieve comprehensive trust funding. The assignment is generally simpler to prepare than a deed and is useful for household goods, collections, and intangible assets that are impractical to retitle. It provides documented evidence that the assets are intended to be trust property and helps successor trustees locate and manage those items. While an assignment can clarify ownership, real property still typically needs a deed to affect county records, so an assignment is often one piece of a coordinated approach to ensure all assets are properly reflected under the trust.
A general assignment can help avoid probate for the assets it successfully places into the trust, but it does not automatically avoid probate for all property. Certain assets require deeds or beneficiary designations to transfer outside of probate, and some assets may pass by operation of law regardless of assignment. As a result, a comprehensive funding plan that combines deeds, beneficiary updates, and assignments where appropriate is typically necessary to minimize probate exposure for the entire estate. The assignment is a useful tool but only part of a broader strategy to reduce probate involvement. To maximize probate avoidance, it is important to review each asset type and use the proper transfer mechanism for that asset. Regular review and consistent documentation across deeds, beneficiary forms, and assignments are necessary to ensure that records match the trust’s ownership. For any assets that remain in the individual’s name at death, a pour-over will may transfer them to the trust but those items could still be subject to probate unless they are otherwise titled or designated to pass outside the estate court. Coordination and periodic updates help minimize probate risk overall.
Real estate typically requires a properly executed and recorded deed to transfer legal title into a trust, so a general assignment alone is usually insufficient for real property. A deed must be prepared, signed, and recorded in the county where the property is located to reflect the trust as the owner. The assignment can still be useful for other connected property or items associated with the real estate, but the deed remains the primary vehicle for changing title to land and buildings in accordance with California recording requirements. For real estate transactions, review of any mortgages, liens, or community property considerations is also necessary because these matters can affect transfer options and lender consents. When transferring property into a trust, it is prudent to confirm that the deed language is compatible with the trust terms and that the county recorder’s procedures are followed. Combining deeds for real property with assignments for personal property creates a cohesive funding plan that addresses the different legal requirements for varied asset types.
Financial institutions vary in the documents they require to accept a transfer or to retitle accounts into a trust. Many will request a certification of trust or similar document that confirms the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority without providing the full trust agreement. Institutions may have their own forms or require specific notarized signatures. It is helpful to contact banks, brokerage firms, and other custodians early in the process to determine their requirements so the assignment and supporting documents meet those conditions and reduce processing delays. When an institution declines to accept a general assignment alone, alternative measures may include completing the institution’s retitling forms, updating beneficiary designations, or providing additional documentation such as a trustee resolution or court order where needed. Preparing a concise package that includes the assignment, a certification of trust, and any requested account forms typically improves the chances of successful recognition by the institution.
Transferring assets into a revocable living trust via assignment generally does not change the income tax treatment for the trust maker while the trust remains revocable. The trust maker typically retains control over the assets and reports income on personal tax returns. However, transferring certain assets can have tax consequences in other contexts, such as property subject to capital gains upon sale or assets with special tax attributes. It is important to consider any potential tax implications prior to transfer and to consult a tax professional about specific holdings. For estates subject to estate tax thresholds or unique tax planning needs, different transfer mechanisms or additional planning may be warranted. While the assignment itself is primarily a property ownership tool, its interaction with tax issues depends on the nature of the assets and the broader plan. Coordinating with a tax advisor helps ensure transfers align with both estate plan objectives and tax considerations.
Regular reviews of a general assignment and related trust funding are recommended whenever significant life changes occur, such as marriage, divorce, the birth of a child, acquisition or sale of major assets, or relocation. Many practitioners advise an informal review every few years even without a major life event to confirm that accounts, deeds, and beneficiary designations continue to match the trust’s terms. Keeping assignments and associated documents up to date reduces the likelihood that assets will fall outside the trust and ensures the plan reflects current intentions. Documentation should be updated promptly when assets are added or transferred, and whenever institutional requirements change. Periodic review also helps identify assets that may have been overlooked during initial funding and keeps successor trustees informed about where documents are stored and how to access account information. A disciplined maintenance routine provides greater certainty in administration and distribution.
If the trust maker becomes incapacitated, assets properly assigned or retitled to the trust can be managed by the successor trustee according to the trust instrument. The trustee’s authority over trust assets facilitates continued management for the benefit of the trust maker and beneficiaries. Having assignments and clear documentation in place reduces the need for conservatorship proceedings, because the trust structure typically provides the legal framework for asset management during incapacity if the trust maker named a successor trustee with the appropriate powers. It is important that the trustee has access to the trust documents, certifications, and account information to carry out their duties. Practical steps such as providing successor trustees with guidance on locating records and ensuring institutions recognize trustee authority help avoid delays in management. Ensuring that powers of attorney and health care directives are coordinated with the trust file also supports comprehensive planning for incapacity.
Yes, a trust maker can exclude particular items from a general assignment and keep them in their personal name or assign them to a different beneficiary if they wish. The assignment document can explicitly carve out excluded items or list only the assets intended for the trust. Clear language avoids ambiguity and ensures that excluded property remains outside trust ownership, which may be desirable for sentimental reasons, tax considerations, or to leave certain assets to specific individuals under separate provisions. When excluding items, it is important to ensure that the remainder of the estate plan reflects the trust maker’s intentions for those excluded assets, including any necessary beneficiary designations or separate wills. Maintaining consistent documentation and communicating intentions to successor trustees can prevent misunderstandings and help the estate plan function as intended at the appropriate time.
Beneficiaries do not typically need to be notified each time an asset is assigned into the trust, but communicating overarching estate planning intentions can reduce surprises and family disputes after incapacity or death. Some trust makers prefer to share a summary of the estate plan with beneficiaries or at least inform key family members of the existence of the trust and where documents are kept. This can foster transparency and help avoid conflicts when trustees begin administration duties. Direct notification of beneficiaries is not required for assignments during the trust maker’s lifetime, but successor trustees will need to follow statutory notice requirements when administering the trust after the trust maker’s death. Sharing information thoughtfully and maintaining organized records gives trustees the tools they need to act efficiently and helps beneficiaries understand the overall plan when the time comes.
Digital accounts and online property present unique challenges because institutions and platforms have varying access policies and terms of service. A general assignment can express the trust maker’s intention that digital assets be held by the trust, but additional steps may be necessary, such as updating account recovery options, providing login information to a secure custodian, or executing platform-specific legacy or transfer settings. Including a schedule that lists digital accounts and instructions for access helps successor trustees handle those assets appropriately. Where platforms permit authorized access or designated legacy contacts, coordinating those options with the trust and assigning access instructions can be effective. It is also advisable to use secure, documented methods to store credentials and to ensure that any digital asset transfer respects the platform’s policies and legal requirements. Clear documentation increases the likelihood that trustees can preserve or transfer digital property in accordance with the trust maker’s wishes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas