A Heggstad Petition can be a vital tool when a transfer of property to a trust is challenged after the settlor’s death. If you are in Hesperia or elsewhere in San Bernardino County and need clarity about whether property was properly transferred into a trust, a Heggstad Petition helps a court determine whether the assets should be treated as trust property. This process addresses situations where title was not formally retitled but the intent and actions of the decedent and trustee indicate the transfer was meant to be into trust ownership.
This page explains when a Heggstad Petition is appropriate, what the petition seeks from the court, and how the process typically unfolds in California. We describe common outcomes, documentation often required, and how a petition can resolve conflicts among beneficiaries, title companies, or third parties. Whether the issue arises from inadvertent failure to re-title real property, confusion over successor trustee authority, or challenges to a trust’s funding, understanding Heggstad petitions can help families and fiduciaries move toward proper administration of estate planning documents.
A Heggstad Petition brings legal clarity to disputed or uncertain transfers into a trust, helping avoid protracted litigation and title defects that can complicate estate administration. By seeking a judicial determination, interested parties can obtain a definitive ruling that property belongs to the trust, which can allow trustees to manage or sell assets without future dispute. The petition can protect beneficiaries’ interests, enable clean title for real estate transactions, and help settling banks and title companies accept the trust’s control over assets without further delay or risk.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists California families with trust administration and related petitions, including Heggstad matters. Based on decades of estate planning work, the firm guides clients through courtroom filings, evidentiary requirements, and negotiations that often accompany property disputes. The practice aims to provide clear communication, practical solutions, and focused representation for trustees, beneficiaries, and family members who need prompt resolution so that trusts can be administered efficiently and assets distributed as intended by the decedent.
A Heggstad Petition is a specific petition filed in probate court to establish that property should be treated as trust property even if title was never formally transferred. California courts consider the settlor’s intent, actions of the trustee, related paperwork, and other evidence to determine whether a transfer into the trust was intended. Often used when a beneficiary, title company, or third party questions whether certain assets belong to the trust, this petition provides a judicial declaration that clarifies ownership and allows trustees to act without ongoing challenge.
The petition process can involve document review, witness statements, and sometimes court hearings. Courts examine trust documents, deeds, correspondence, and actions taken by the settlor and trustee. A successful Heggstad Petition can resolve disputes over real property, bank accounts, or other titled assets, and it can prevent future claims that would otherwise cloud title or complicate distributions. Understanding the factual and legal standards for such petitions helps trustees prepare the compelling record that courts require to rule in favor of trust ownership.
A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to determine that property should be treated as trust assets despite a failure to transfer title formally. The petition takes its name from case law establishing that intent and conduct can be sufficient to show the settlor meant assets to be part of the trust. Courts will look at the totality of the circumstances, including trust terms, any attempted transfers, and supporting affidavits. A favorable ruling can remove uncertainty about ownership and allow trustees to manage trust assets in line with the settlor’s intent.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically include a clear statement of facts, authenticated trust documents, and evidence showing intent to fund the trust. Courts may require deeds, bank records, correspondence, and testimony from those familiar with the settlor’s actions. The process often begins with preparing the petition and supporting exhibits, serving interested parties, and responding to challenges. If disputed, hearings may be necessary. The court’s focus is on demonstrating, by the preponderance of the evidence in civil probate proceedings, that assets should be treated as trust property.
Knowing the terminology used in trust and probate matters helps when navigating a Heggstad Petition. Terms such as settlor, trustee, deed, beneficiary, and funding are commonly used. Understanding the procedural steps — petition, notice, hearing, and judgment — clarifies expectations and timelines. Familiarity with how courts weigh evidence and what documentation is persuasive assists trustees and beneficiaries in preparing a thorough and organized filing that supports a favorable judicial determination about the status of property purportedly held in trust.
The settlor is the person who creates the trust and whose intent is central to a Heggstad Petition. Courts examine the settlor’s actions and documentation to decide whether property was meant to become part of the trust. Evidence of the settlor’s intent can include signed trust documents, deeds with trust language, and contemporaneous communications about estate planning. Confirming what the settlor intended is often the decisive factor in determining whether assets should be legally recognized as trust property under California law.
Funding refers to the process of transferring assets into the trust’s ownership, such as re-titling real estate or assigning accounts to the trust. In Heggstad matters, courts consider whether funding was completed in substance even if formal title transfers were incomplete. Evidence of funding can include declarations, assignments, deeds prepared but not recorded, or actions by the settlor indicating the trust was intended to control particular assets. Proper funding is important to avoid later disputes or the need for litigation to confirm trust ownership.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed to manage trust property for the beneficiaries. When a trustee seeks a Heggstad ruling, the court evaluates whether the trustee’s administration aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether the assets should be recognized as trust property so the trustee can act. Evidence may demonstrate that the trustee handled assets under the terms of the trust, paid expenses from trust funds, or otherwise treated property as belonging to the trust prior to the settlor’s passing.
A Heggstad Petition is a court filing requesting a judicial declaration that certain property belongs to a trust despite lack of formal transfer. It is tailored to resolve gaps between intent and title, often involving real estate. The petition presents factual and documentary proof to show that the settlor intended the property to be trust-owned and that actions taken reflect that intent. A favorable court determination clears title and supports proper trust administration, reducing the risk of later litigation or claims by successors or creditors.
When title and intent conflict, parties may consider a Heggstad Petition, a quiet title action, or probate administration depending on the circumstances. Heggstad Petitions focus on declaring assets trust property based on intent, while quiet title actions resolve competing claims to real estate more broadly. Probate can be necessary when no valid trust exists. Each path has different evidentiary standards, timelines, and potential costs. Choosing the right approach depends on the strength of the documentary record, the parties involved, and the desired speed and scope of resolution.
A limited approach may be sufficient when there is clear documentary evidence showing the settlor intended to fund the trust and the interested parties agree on the facts. For example, if signed trust documents and contemporaneous correspondence indicate intent and only formal re-titling is missing, parties can often resolve the matter with a focused filing. When opposition is unlikely and title companies are satisfied with the record, a streamlined petition can resolve ownership questions without full-scale litigation, saving time and expense while still achieving a definitive court ruling.
When beneficiaries, successors, and potential claimants are in agreement about the settlor’s intent and how the trust should be administered, a limited petition or stipulated court order may be appropriate. Consensus reduces the need for contested hearings and can lead to quicker judicial approval of trust ownership. In these situations, the petition can focus on presenting the trust documents and a concise factual record to the court, allowing trustees to obtain the declarations they need to manage or transfer trust assets with minimal delay and lower legal cost.
A comprehensive legal approach is advisable when ownership is contested or beneficiaries dispute the settlor’s intent, as contested matters often require depositions, document authentication, and courtroom hearings. Where title companies refuse to accept the trust’s control or third parties assert competing claims, a broader strategy ensures careful evidence gathering and litigation planning. This can involve coordinating witnesses, reviewing transactional history, and preparing for contested hearings so the court can weigh competing narratives and reach a legally sound determination regarding trust ownership.
When assets have complex histories, multiple transfers, or cross-jurisdictional issues, more thorough legal work is often required. Tracing title, reconciling inconsistent records, and addressing creditor claims or liens may involve detailed investigation and coordination with title companies, financial institutions, and outside counsel. A comprehensive approach prepares a robust evidentiary record and a litigation plan to address unexpected challenges, increasing the likelihood that the court will accept the argument that assets should be treated as trust property despite formal defects.
Taking a thorough approach to a Heggstad Petition can reduce the risk of future litigation by producing a clear and well-supported court ruling that removes ambiguity over ownership. A detailed record anticipates likely challenges and addresses them preemptively, which can protect beneficiaries and trustees alike. A comprehensive strategy also helps in negotiations with title companies and lenders, making it easier to obtain clean title, finalize real estate sales, and complete trust distributions without subsequent challenges that can reopen the estate administration process.
Another benefit of a comprehensive approach is the preservation of evidentiary materials and procedural safeguards that strengthen a court filing. Meticulous documentation, credible witness statements, and careful legal argumentation minimize uncertainty and support a durable judicial outcome. While more involved initially, this method often avoids piecemeal disputes later, reducing cumulative costs and emotional strain on families by providing definitive resolution of ownership and preventing future attempts to contest trust property once the court has ruled.
A comprehensive Heggstad filing that results in a judicial determination can clear title issues that would otherwise block sales or refinancing. Lenders and title companies are more likely to proceed when a court has declared the property trust-owned, which simplifies closing real estate transactions. This clarity benefits trustees who must manage or liquidate assets and helps beneficiaries receive intended distributions promptly. Well-documented proceedings reduce the likelihood of future claims that could cloud title or delay transfers.
When a court issues a clear ruling recognizing trust ownership, trustees gain practical authority to act without ongoing fear of successful challenges. That judicial assurance protects beneficiaries by creating a firm basis for administration and distribution. A thorough process anticipates disputes and secures the documents and testimony needed to support the trust’s claims, helping avoid future re-litigation. The resulting protection provides families with confidence that the settlor’s plan will be honored and that assets will be handled in accord with the trust’s terms.
Gathering clear, well-organized documents is often the most persuasive way to support a Heggstad Petition. Collect the trust agreement, any deeds or attempted transfers, correspondence referencing funding, bank or title company communications, and records showing the settlor’s actions. Witness statements from those who observed the settlor’s intent and actions are also important. Presenting a tidy, chronological file helps the court quickly understand the facts and reduces the risk that missing or contradictory documents will undermine the petition.
Title companies and lenders may require specific documentation or a court order before accepting trust title for closings. Anticipate these requirements by coordinating with the title company early, understanding what evidence they will accept, and addressing any liens or encumbrances that could complicate transfers. Preparing a court order that the title company can rely on, or securing a formal judgment through a Heggstad Petition, often resolves their concerns and expedites real estate transactions involving trust property.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when ownership of trust-related assets is unclear due to incomplete re-titling, disputes among heirs, or when title companies refuse to recognize the trust. The petition can resolve gaps between the settlor’s intent and formal records, enabling trustees to manage, sell, or transfer assets consistent with the trust terms. It is particularly useful when quick resolution is needed for real estate closings or to prevent disputes from escalating into longer litigation that would delay distributions and increase costs for the estate and beneficiaries.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad Petition is to protect the stability of trust administration by obtaining a judicial declaration that removes future uncertainties. When there are competing claims or potential creditor issues, securing a court determination that property belongs to the trust can deter later challenges and give successors confidence to proceed with management. Timely action through the petition process helps preserve value, shorten administrative timelines, and provide legal authority for trustees to follow the settlor’s plan.
Typical circumstances include deeds prepared but not recorded, bank accounts still titled in the deceased’s name, or situations where the settlor attempted transfers but paperwork was incomplete. Disputes often arise when beneficiaries disagree about whether an asset should be administered through probate or as part of the trust. Title companies frequently ask for a court ruling before accepting trust title for real estate transactions, and in those cases a Heggstad Petition provides the judicial clarity needed to proceed with sales or refinancing.
When a house or other real property was intended to be owned by a trust but the deed remains in the settlor’s name, a Heggstad Petition can clarify ownership. The court will examine the trust documents, any deed drafts, and actions demonstrating intent to fund the trust. Resolving this through a petition avoids a full probate process for that asset and enables trustees to handle the property according to the trust terms, whether that means selling, refinancing, or retaining the property for the beneficiaries’ benefit.
Accounts left in the deceased’s name can create obstacles to trust administration and distribution. A Heggstad Petition can support a determination that such accounts were intended as trust assets, allowing trustees to access funds for administration or distribution. Evidence might include account applications, beneficiary designations, or communications indicating the settlor’s plan. A favorable ruling removes uncertainty for banks and other institutions, enabling trustees to manage the estate’s liquidity without needing probate letters for each account.
Title companies sometimes refuse to insure title for a sale or refinancing when the trust’s ownership is not clearly documented. When that occurs, a Heggstad Petition can produce the court order the title company needs to proceed. The petition presents evidence supporting trust ownership so the title company can issue a policy and the transaction can close. Obtaining a judicial declaration in advance gives reassurance to buyers, sellers, and lenders that transfers executed by the trustee are legally sound.
If you face uncertainty about whether property is part of a trust, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with filing a Heggstad Petition and preparing the record the court requires. Serving clients in Hesperia, San Bernardino County, and nearby communities, the firm helps trustees and beneficiaries assemble documentation, draft the petition, serve interested parties, and pursue a judicial determination that clarifies ownership. The goal is to obtain a reliable court order that allows trust administration to proceed with minimal further dispute.
Our firm focuses on providing clear, practical guidance for trust administration matters, including Heggstad Petitions. We prioritize organized documentation, timely filing, and strategic presentation of facts to courts so that trustees can obtain the declarations necessary to manage property. Clients receive straightforward explanations of the process, anticipated timelines, and realistic assessments of outcomes so they can make informed choices about pursuing a petition versus alternative paths for resolving title issues.
We also communicate with title companies, banks, and other institutions to understand what evidence they require and tailor petition filings accordingly. This coordination reduces back-and-forth and supports efficient closings when real estate transactions depend on establishing trust ownership. By preparing a complete, well-supported petition and staying responsive to opposing parties’ concerns, the firm seeks to minimize surprises and facilitate a judicial determination that clears title and permits decisive trust administration.
Clients in Hesperia and throughout the region benefit from responsive counsel that focuses on practical resolution. From assembling declarations to navigating hearings, we help preserve estate value and reduce friction among heirs and third parties. Our approach aims to obtain a durable court ruling that aligns with the settlor’s intent, enabling trustees to proceed with confidence and beneficiaries to receive their distributions without prolonged delay or additional contested disputes.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents to determine whether a Heggstad Petition is the appropriate course. We identify necessary evidence, prepare the petition and exhibits, and serve required notices to interested parties. If the matter is uncontested, we seek a stipulated order. If contested, we prepare for evidentiary hearings by organizing witness statements, authenticating documents, and presenting a persuasive factual narrative to the court with the goal of securing a clear judicial declaration that property should be treated as trust assets.
The first step is a careful assessment of the trust document, deeds, correspondence, and any transfer-related paperwork. Gathering and organizing evidence helps determine the strength of a petition and what additional information may be needed. This phase often involves obtaining copies of title reports, bank statements, and communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. A thorough collection and review of materials lays the groundwork for a focused petition that addresses likely challenges and clarifies the factual record for the court.
We compile a comprehensive inventory of assets that may be subject to the Heggstad Petition, including real estate, accounts, and titled personal property. This inventory documents ownership status, any draft deeds or transfer attempts, and existing encumbrances. By creating a clear asset list, trustees and beneficiaries can prioritize which items require immediate attention and which can be addressed through a single petition or separate filings, helping to streamline court proceedings and minimize duplicated efforts.
We gather all relevant documents and prepare declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent and actions. Witness statements and notarized affidavits often bridge gaps in title records by corroborating that the settlor treated assets as part of the trust. Authenticating documents and crafting clear witness statements increases the petition’s persuasiveness and helps the court understand the factual context behind why formal title might not match the trust’s intended ownership.
After preparing the petition and exhibits, we file the documents with the appropriate probate court and serve notice on all required parties. This step adheres to California probate rules regarding who must be informed and how notice is delivered. Prompt and proper service avoids procedural challenges and ensures that all interested persons have the opportunity to respond. If objections arise, we evaluate their bases and attempt resolution through stipulation or prepare to address objections at hearing.
Proper service of the petition is critical to the court’s jurisdiction and to preventing later procedural challenges. We ensure that all beneficiaries, known heirs, and potential claimants receive the required notice within statutory timelines. Addressing procedural details up front reduces the risk of defects that could delay proceedings. We also monitor for any responses or objections and provide guidance on whether negotiations, mediation, or stipulations can efficiently resolve disputes without contested hearings.
When objections arise, we engage with opposing parties to clarify facts and seek stipulations that narrow issues for the court. Negotiation can eliminate the need for evidentiary hearings when agreement is possible. If disputes remain, we prepare responsive pleadings, evidence, and legal argumentation tailored to the objections raised. The goal is to focus the court’s attention on the core factual questions and to present a coherent record that supports trust ownership under applicable California standards.
If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present the evidence and witness declarations demonstrating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. After the court issues its decision, we assist with implementing the judgment, including obtaining certified orders for title companies, recording documents if necessary, and updating trust and estate records. Implementation ensures that trustees can act in accordance with the ruling, completing sales, transfers, or distributions consistent with the court’s declaration on trust ownership.
At hearing, the court evaluates the documentary and testimonial evidence to determine whether the assets should be treated as trust property. We present a focused case emphasizing the settlor’s intent and actions that support trust funding. Clear presentation of records and competent witness testimony aids the court in reaching a practical and enforceable decision. A well-prepared hearing can result in a definitive order that removes obstacles to administration and provides the documentation necessary for title companies and lenders.
After securing a court ruling, we work to implement the order by preparing certified documents for recordation if needed and coordinating with title companies, banks, and other institutions. We also address any residual issues, such as liens or creditor claims, to ensure the trust can be administered and assets distributed. Completing these final steps transforms a judicial declaration into practical authority for trustees to carry out the settlor’s plan without further uncertainty or procedural barriers.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate filing that seeks a judicial declaration that certain property should be treated as trust assets despite any defect in formal title. It is used when the settlor’s intent to fund the trust is evident from documents or conduct but the legal title was never fully transferred. The petition presents evidence such as trust agreements, deeds, and witness statements to show the court that the asset should belong to the trust. This remedy helps trustees obtain the authority needed to manage or transfer the asset in accordance with the trust terms. Filing such a petition can prevent prolonged uncertainty and enable estate administration to proceed. A petition is often appropriate when a title company will not insure a transfer without a court order, or when heirs dispute whether an asset belongs to the trust. The court examines the totality of the circumstances to determine intent, and if satisfied, will enter an order recognizing the property as trust-owned. Once obtained, the order provides practical documentation for institutions and reduces the chance of later successful challenges. It is important to assemble a coherent factual record because the court’s ruling depends on credible documentary and testimonial evidence.
A Heggstad Petition focuses on whether property should be treated as trust property based on the settlor’s intent and actions, whereas probate administration addresses distributing assets that pass under intestacy or a will. Quiet title actions resolve competing claims to real estate generally but do not specifically focus on trust funding intent. A Heggstad Petition is tailored to trust-related ownership questions and seeks a declaration to enable trust administration, while probate or quiet title proceedings address different legal pathways and standards applicable to their particular aims. Choosing among these options depends on the facts. If a valid trust exists and the central question is whether specific assets belong to that trust, a Heggstad Petition is often the most directly relevant. If no trust exists, probate may be required. If multiple parties assert competing claims to a parcel of real property unrelated to trust funding intent, a quiet title action may be appropriate. Evaluating the available evidence and desired outcome helps determine the most efficient and appropriate legal path.
The most persuasive evidence in a Heggstad Petition includes signed trust documents showing intent, deeds or draft deeds referencing the trust, bank and title company communications, and contemporaneous correspondence that demonstrates funding intent. Witness declarations from individuals who observed the settlor’s statements or actions can further corroborate intent. The combination of written materials and sworn testimony that aligns with the settlor’s plan tends to be compelling to the court and can bridge formal defects in title. Additionally, records showing that the trustee or settlor treated the asset as trust property, such as paying expenses from trust accounts or attempting to re-title an asset, strengthen the petition. Organized, chronological presentation and authenticated documents help the court quickly grasp the factual narrative. Absent strong documentation, the petition may face greater scrutiny and possible challenges, so investing time in assembling a thorough evidentiary file is often decisive.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition varies depending on the case complexity and whether the petition is contested. An uncontested petition with clear documentation may be resolved in a few months, whereas contested matters that require discovery and hearings can take significantly longer. Court schedules, service requirements, and the need for additional evidence or depositions all affect the duration. Early coordination with interested parties and prompt collection of records can shorten the process in many cases. If objections arise, the matter may require additional pleadings, evidence, and courtroom hearings, extending the timeline. Working proactively to address likely challenges, securing stipulations when possible, and preparing a complete record for the court are practical steps to avoid unnecessary delays. Your specific timeline will depend on the county court’s calendar and the willingness of parties to resolve issues without extended litigation.
A Heggstad Petition often resolves title company concerns when the court issues a clear order recognizing the property as trust-owned. Title companies are generally willing to accept judicial determinations as sufficient proof to insure a transaction. The petition should include the documentation the title company requires, and the court’s order provides the certification they need to proceed with closings, sales, or refinancings while protecting the insurer’s interests. However, resolution is not automatic in every case. Title companies may have additional requirements if there are liens, unresolved creditor claims, or competing claims to the property. Addressing those encumbrances and presenting a thorough evidentiary record increases the likelihood that the title company will accept the court’s ruling and proceed with the transaction without further delay.
If beneficiaries object to a Heggstad Petition, the court will consider their objections and may permit discovery or require evidentiary hearings. Objections often raise questions about the settlor’s intent or the sufficiency of documentation. The responding party must then address those challenges through additional evidence, testimony, or legal argument. The process can involve negotiation, deposition, and courtroom advocacy to resolve disputed factual issues and allow the court to reach a determination based on the record. Where objections cannot be resolved through stipulation, preparing a robust factual presentation becomes especially important. The court will weigh competing narratives and the credibility of evidence. The goal is to reach a judicial finding that fairly accounts for the settlor’s intent and the rights of beneficiaries, while following California probate rules and procedures governing notice and participation of interested persons.
A trustee should be cautious about proceeding with a sale before obtaining a court order if title is disputed or unclear. Acting without a judicial declaration can expose the trustee to claims from beneficiaries or third parties who contend the property was not properly part of the trust. In some circumstances where the risk is low and parties agree, a trustee may be able to proceed with caution, but proceeding without resolving title issues can lead to personal liability or later invalidation of the transaction. When uncertainty exists, pursuing a Heggstad Petition or obtaining a stipulation among interested parties provides protection. A court order confirming trust ownership gives trustees the authority to proceed with sales or other transactions with confidence, and title companies and lenders are more likely to cooperate when the court has ruled. Prioritizing legal clarity helps prevent disputes and preserves the trustee’s ability to manage trust assets responsibly.
Alternatives to a Heggstad Petition include negotiating a stipulation among interested parties, pursuing probate if no valid trust exists, or bringing a quiet title action in certain circumstances. Stipulations can be effective when heirs and beneficiaries agree on how to treat an asset and want to avoid litigation, while probate is the appropriate path if the trust is invalid or unavailable. Quiet title actions address conflicting claims to real property but do not specifically adjudicate trust funding intent unless framed to do so under applicable law. Choosing an alternative depends on the facts and the parties’ willingness to resolve issues without court determinations on trust funding. Consulting with counsel to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each path helps stakeholders select the most efficient and appropriate course. When disputes are limited and parties cooperate, alternatives that avoid contested hearings can save time and expense while still achieving practical resolution.
Costs associated with a Heggstad Petition vary based on complexity, the need for discovery, and whether the petition is contested. An uncontested petition with a straightforward record can be relatively modest in cost, while contested matters involving depositions, expert review, and extended hearings increase fees and expenses. Court filing fees and costs for obtaining records and title reports also contribute to the overall expense. The potential cost should be weighed against the likely benefit of resolving title issues and enabling estate administration to proceed. Early case assessment and targeted evidence collection can control costs by focusing efforts on the most persuasive documentation. When possible, negotiating stipulations or resolving disputes without trial reduces fees. Discussing estimated costs and potential outcomes at the outset helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus alternatives such as probate or negotiated settlement.
To start the process, gather the trust document, any deeds or transfer-related paperwork, account statements, and correspondence that reflect the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Contact counsel to review the materials and evaluate whether a Heggstad Petition is the appropriate remedy. A preliminary consultation generally covers the facts, the available evidence, and a recommended next step, which may include additional document collection or outreach to interested parties to seek a stipulated resolution. Once retained, counsel will prepare the petition, assemble supporting exhibits, and handle service and procedural requirements. If necessary, counsel will represent the client at hearings and work to obtain a clear court order that confirms trust ownership. Taking action early helps prevent delays in administration and reduces the risk that disputes will complicate future transactions involving trust property.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas