If you are considering changing the terms of a trust for a loved one or yourself in Needles, this guide explains the process and what to expect. Trust modification petitions allow interested parties to request court approval to amend a trust when circumstances have changed, when errors need correction, or when modifications are necessary to reflect the grantor’s intent. In San Bernardino County, local rules and state law determine whether a court will grant a modification. This overview describes common grounds for petitions, the parties who may file, and the practical steps typically involved when pursuing a modification in the California probate court system.
Understanding the role of a trust modification petition starts with recognizing the variety of situations that prompt requests for change. Reasons include changes in family circumstances, ambiguity in trust language, tax considerations, or the need to adapt to the grantor’s diminished capacity. A petition can be used to modify administrative provisions, adjust distributions, correct mistakes, or implement agreements among beneficiaries. This section introduces the potential outcomes and timelines so you can plan ahead and gather necessary documents, such as the original trust instrument, related deeds or beneficiary designations, and any relevant communications that explain the grantor’s intent.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the integrity and functionality of an estate plan by ensuring the trust reflects current realities. Changes in law, family dynamics, property holdings, or the grantor’s health can render trust provisions impractical or unintended. A successful petition clarifies administration, prevents disputes, and can avoid costly litigation later. Petitioning also creates an official court record of the modification, which can deter future challenges. For trustees and beneficiaries, a well-handled modification reduces uncertainty, streamlines asset distribution, and aligns trust management with the grantor’s latest wishes and the legal framework in California.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients in Needles and across California, offering comprehensive assistance with trust administration and modification matters. Our firm focuses on clear communication, careful preparation of pleadings, and court navigation tailored to local San Bernardino County procedures. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to assemble the documents courts require and to present lawful grounds for modification. When needed, we coordinate with accountants, financial advisors, or medical professionals to support factual claims, always aiming to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting clients’ interests in trust assets and administration.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to approve changes to an existing trust instrument. Under California law, modifications may be requested for a variety of reasons, including settlement agreements among beneficiaries, clerical errors, changes consistent with the grantor’s intent, or when the grantor lacks capacity and the modification protects the trust’s purpose. The court looks for proper notice to interested parties, a legal basis for the change, and evidence supporting the requested amendment. The process typically involves filing a petition, serving interested parties, and attending a hearing where the court evaluates the petition against statutory requirements and any objections.
Preparing a petition requires careful documentation and a clear statement of the relief sought. Relevant materials commonly include the original or most recent trust instrument, any amendments, records of beneficiary communications or agreements, property schedules, and supporting declarations. If the modification addresses an error or ambiguity, evidence showing the grantor’s intended meaning is important. When the change is the result of an agreement among beneficiaries, the court will consider whether the proposed modification is fair and consistent with the trust’s purpose. Attention to procedural requirements and thorough factual support improves the likelihood of a favorable court ruling.
A trust modification petition formally requests the court to alter, correct, or clarify trust provisions to reflect current circumstances or the grantor’s intent. Modifications can be modest, such as correcting a typographical error, or substantive, such as changing distribution terms, altering trustee powers, or addressing tax planning needs. The petition spells out the legal basis for the change—whether it is based on a mutual agreement, the trust’s administrative difficulties, mistake, or changed circumstances—and provides supporting evidence. The court evaluates whether the requested modification aligns with California statutes and the trust’s overall purposes before granting relief.
Successful petitions rely on accurate documentation, clear legal theories, and proper notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties. Key elements include identifying the petitioner and interested parties, specifying the exact modification requested, and attaching relevant exhibits such as the trust document and any proposed revised provisions. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or other witnesses may explain the circumstances prompting the change. Filing must comply with local court rules regarding forms, filing fees, and notification. After filing and service, the court may set a hearing where objections are heard and the judge determines whether to approve the modification.
Understanding common terms makes the petition process less intimidating. This glossary defines phrases you will encounter, explains their relevance to a modification petition, and outlines how they influence court decisions. Knowing terms like petitioner, interested person, conservatorship, settlor, and probate court procedure helps you follow the sequence of filings, service, and potential hearings. Clear definitions also assist when reviewing the trust document and crafting declarations that support the requested amendment. Familiarizing yourself with these terms empowers trustees and beneficiaries to participate knowledgeably throughout the process.
The petitioner is the individual or entity that files the petition seeking modification of the trust. Interested parties include trustees, beneficiaries, and others with a legal or financial stake in the trust. California probate law requires notice to interested parties so they have an opportunity to consent or object. Identifying these people early ensures proper service and reduces procedural risks. Interested parties may present evidence in support of or opposition to the petition, and the court will weigh their interests when deciding whether the proposed changes are appropriate and lawful under the trust instrument and state statutes.
Corrective or clarifying modifications address mistakes, ambiguities, or technical defects in the trust document that hinder its administration. These modifications often involve revising language to reflect the grantor’s original intent or to correct drafting errors that created unintended consequences. Courts may approve such adjustments when there is persuasive evidence about what the grantor intended or when a mutual agreement among beneficiaries clearly supports the change. The goal is to make the document workable and faithful to the settlor’s purpose while safeguarding beneficiaries’ rights and complying with statutory standards.
Decanting refers to transferring assets from one trust into another trust with different terms, when permitted by the trust instrument or state law. This process can accomplish changes in distribution rules, trustee powers, or tax planning without formally amending the original document. When decanting is not available or appropriate, a court-ordered modification may be needed to restructure trust terms. Both approaches require careful documentation and consideration of beneficiary interests and tax implications. Courts will evaluate whether the restructuring is consistent with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s purpose.
Capacity refers to the grantor’s mental ability to create or change trust terms. When the grantor lacks capacity, modifications may require beneficiary agreement or court review to protect the grantor’s intent. Consent from all interested parties can support a petition, but courts still assess whether the change aligns with legal standards and the trust’s purposes. Court approval provides a formal ruling that validates the modification and reduces future disputes. Documentation that demonstrates the grantor’s past statements, contemporaneous documents, or beneficiary agreements helps courts determine the appropriateness of the requested change.
When considering changes to a trust, you may have several pathways: obtaining beneficiary agreement, using statutory decanting provisions, or petitioning the court for a formal modification. Mutual agreement among beneficiaries can be the simplest route if all parties consent and the trust instrument allows for the change without court involvement. Decanting may accomplish goals without litigation when law and instrument permit a transfer to a new trust. A court petition becomes necessary when parties disagree, when technical or substantive legal issues exist, or when the trust language is ambiguous and requires judicial interpretation to effect the intended change.
If every beneficiary agrees to a proposed change and the trust instrument permits amendment by consent, a limited approach may be sufficient to implement the modification without court involvement. This path is often faster, less costly, and avoids creating a public court record. All parties should document their agreement in writing and update trust records accordingly. Even when beneficiaries agree, it is important to confirm that the change will not violate applicable laws or the trust instrument and that the modification is properly executed to prevent future challenges or misunderstandings about the new terms.
Minor administrative corrections, such as updating contact information, correcting typographical errors, or clarifying trustee mailing addresses, can often be handled informally by the trustee without a court petition. Trustees should record these updates in trust records and notify beneficiaries as appropriate. When the change does not affect distributions or core trust purposes, courts typically do not need to be involved. Proper documentation and communication reduce the risk of disputes and ensure continuity in trust administration while preserving the trust’s intent and function.
When beneficiaries disagree about the proposed changes or when a trustee and beneficiaries cannot reach consensus, court involvement provides a structured forum to resolve disputes and issue a binding decision. A petition establishes a legal record, allows objections to be heard, and enables the judge to weigh competing evidence and legal arguments. Court approval is often the safest path when contested issues involve interpretation of trust language or when one party claims the modification would harm their rights. The judicial process helps ensure fairness and legal compliance before any substantive changes take effect.
Substantive changes that affect distributions, beneficiary rights, or the trust’s purpose typically require careful legal review and, in many cases, court authorization. Such modifications can raise tax implications, creditor concerns, or conflicts with the trust instrument that must be resolved under California law. When the requested change significantly alters the operation or intent of the trust, the court will examine evidence and legal arguments to determine whether the modification is permitted and appropriate. Legal counsel helps prepare the petition, present supporting declarations, and address objections during hearings.
Pursuing a court-approved modification provides legal certainty by creating an official record of the change that is less vulnerable to later challenge. Court orders reduce ambiguity for trustees and third parties such as banks or title companies, making it easier to administer trust assets according to the revised terms. The process also allows for a thorough review of evidence, which can protect vulnerable beneficiaries and ensure that the modification aligns with the grantor’s intent. For cases with potential disputes or significant asset implications, court approval brings finality and enforceability to the new trust provisions.
Another benefit of a comprehensive approach is procedural protection for trustees, who gain authority to implement changes without risk of later personal liability when acting under a court order. This clarity helps trustees make fiduciary decisions with confidence and facilitates cooperation from financial institutions that may require proof of court authorization. Additionally, the court’s involvement can streamline resolution of competing claims and allow the judge to set terms that balance competing interests. For families facing complex legal or factual issues, the structure and finality of a court proceeding can be reassuring and practical.
A court order granting a trust modification creates a clear legal framework that trustees and beneficiaries can rely upon, minimizing future litigation risk. Enforceability is especially important when third parties or institutions must accept revised terms for property transfers or disbursements. The judicial process ensures that the modification complies with governing statutes and that the rights of all interested parties are considered. This kind of formal resolution reduces ambiguity and promotes consistent administration of trust assets according to the updated provisions.
When a modification is approved by the court, trustees receive protection from later claims that their actions were improper, provided they act in accordance with the order. Beneficiaries also benefit from an impartial review that safeguards vulnerable interests and confirms the modification’s alignment with the trust’s purpose. Court oversight helps prevent unilateral or improperly documented changes and provides a remedy if objections are raised. This balanced protection supports orderly administration and reduces the likelihood of protracted disputes that can deplete trust assets.
Gathering the trust document, amendments, deeds, beneficiary statements, and any related correspondence is the first step in preparing a modification petition. Accurate records help clarify the provisions at issue and provide evidence of the grantor’s intent or of beneficiary agreements. If the trust controls specific real property, assemble title and tax records to show current ownership. Solid documentation streamlines drafting the petition and supporting declarations, shortens the discovery phase if there are disputes, and demonstrates to the court that the proposed modification is based on a clear factual foundation rather than speculation.
Evaluate how the proposed modification affects other estate planning documents, beneficiary designations, and potential tax consequences. Changes that alter distribution timing, beneficiary interests, or asset ownership can have unintended effects on estate or income tax liabilities and on related instruments like wills or retirement account designations. Review the full estate plan and consult with financial or tax advisers when relevant. Presenting a petition that accounts for these broader implications helps the court understand the necessity and reasonableness of the modification and reduces the likelihood of post-modification complications.
You should consider a trust modification petition when the trust no longer serves its purpose or when ambiguities, errors, or changing circumstances make current provisions impractical. Common triggers include changes in beneficiary relationships, new property acquisitions, tax law shifts, or evidence that the original document contains drafting mistakes. A petition can correct the record, realign distributions with the grantor’s intent, and address administrative obstacles. If parties cannot reach agreement or if third parties require court authorization to accept revised terms, a petition becomes a necessary step to protect the trust’s integrity.
Trustees may also seek a petition when they need judicial approval to take actions that fall outside the trust instrument’s explicit powers. Court authorization can clarify trustee authority for transactions, defend trustees from personal liability, and obtain direction about managing assets under changing circumstances. Additionally, a petition can resolve disputes over beneficiary interpretations and create binding resolutions that reduce future litigation risks. Consulting with legal counsel early helps identify whether a petition is advisable and prepares the factual and legal support necessary for a successful filing.
Frequent circumstances prompting modification include changes in family structure such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths; the grantor’s relocation or significant asset changes; and the discovery of ambiguous or conflicting provisions in the trust document. Other reasons are updates needed for tax planning, guardian or trustee substitutions, and correcting mistakes that could frustrate the trust’s purpose. In all cases, a careful review of the trust language and documentation of surrounding facts help determine whether an agreement, decanting, or a court petition is the most effective route to achieve the desired result.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, the birth of children, or the passing of beneficiaries often prompt reconsideration of the trust’s distribution scheme. When a grantor’s family situation changes, the original terms may no longer reflect their wishes or the practical needs of beneficiaries. A petition can align the trust with current relationships and responsibilities. Documenting these changes and demonstrating how the proposed modification reasonably implements the grantor’s updated intentions increases the likelihood of court approval and helps avoid future challenges from interested parties.
Drafting errors, unclear language, or conflicting provisions can create confusion about administration and beneficiary rights. Ambiguity may lead to differing interpretations among trustees and beneficiaries, making it difficult to carry out the trust’s purposes. A petition asking the court to construe or modify problematic language can resolve uncertainty and provide definitive guidance for trustees. Courts evaluate extrinsic evidence and relevant circumstances to determine the grantor’s intent and may authorize revisions to ensure the trust functions as intended.
Changes in asset composition, tax law, or administrative burdens can make existing trust terms impractical. For example, new assets may require different distribution schedules, or tax planning considerations may necessitate altering trust structures. When statutory decanting is not available or insufficient, a modification petition can enable adjustments that improve administration and tax outcomes for beneficiaries. Presenting clear financial documentation and articulating the administrative concerns to the court helps justify the requested changes and demonstrates that the modification serves the trust’s overall objectives.
Residents of Needles considering a trust modification petition have local access to assistance through the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman. We provide guidance on preparing petitions, assembling supporting documents, and navigating San Bernardino County court procedures. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries and thorough preparation of factual declarations and proposed revised provisions. Whether you need help evaluating alternatives like beneficiary agreement or decanting, or you require a court petition to resolve disputes, we can help you understand the process and pursue an orderly resolution that protects the trust’s purpose and interested parties’ rights.
When you are navigating a trust modification in Needles, having counsel familiar with local court practices and probate procedures helps streamline the process. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focus on preparing clear, well-supported petitions and communicating directly with trustees and beneficiaries to reduce friction. We carefully review the trust document and related records to identify the best path forward, whether that involves negotiating agreements, pursuing decanting options, or filing a petition. Our goal is to minimize delay, reduce conflict, and present the strongest factual and legal basis for the requested change.
We assist clients at every stage, from initial assessment and evidence gathering to filing, service, and hearing representation. This includes drafting proposed revised provisions, preparing declarations from trustees and beneficiaries, and coordinating any financial or medical documentation needed to support the petition. Our work is tailored to the specifics of San Bernardino County procedures to ensure filings comply with local rules. Clear, proactive communication with clients keeps them informed about timelines, likely outcomes, and options for resolving disputes outside of court when that is feasible.
For trustees, beneficiaries, and family members, our role is to protect your legal interests while seeking practical, legally sound solutions. We explain the trade-offs between informal resolutions and formal court petitions so clients can make informed decisions. When the matter requires court involvement, we prepare the necessary documents and advocate for outcomes that align with the trust’s purpose and the grantor’s intent. We also help implement court orders into trust administration to ensure seamless follow-through once a modification is approved.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust document and relevant records to identify the grounds for modification and any procedural requirements. We then develop a strategy tailored to your goals and the facts, including whether to seek a beneficiary agreement, pursue decanting where available, or file a court petition. If a petition is necessary, we prepare the pleading, compile exhibits, arrange service on interested parties, and represent you at hearings. Throughout, we emphasize timely communication, realistic expectations about possible outcomes, and practical steps to implement any approved changes.
The first step involves gathering all trust-related documents and evaluating the legal basis for a modification petition. We collect the trust instrument, amendments, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that sheds light on the grantor’s intent. This phase includes identifying interested parties and determining whether agreements or decanting are viable alternatives. A thorough factual review informs the drafting of the petition and supporting declarations, ensuring the court has the necessary context to consider the requested modification.
We identify all parties who must be notified and who may have standing to object, including trustees, beneficiaries, and creditors when applicable. Accurate identification and service are essential to meet procedural requirements and prevent delays. We also assess potential objections and gather evidence that addresses foreseeable challenges. Knowing who has an interest in the trust helps craft a petition that anticipates concerns and focuses on persuasive facts that support the requested modification.
Collecting declarations, financial records, deeds, and any documentation of the grantor’s intent is central to presenting a persuasive petition. We work with clients to obtain witness statements and other proof that explains the circumstances prompting the change. This evidence supports assertions about mistakes, changed circumstances, or beneficiary agreements and provides the court with a factual record on which to base its decision. Thorough evidence gathering shortens the hearing process and strengthens the petition’s chance of success.
Drafting a petition requires precise language that delineates the requested modification and the legal grounds supporting it. We prepare the petition, attach relevant exhibits, and submit required forms and filing fees to the San Bernardino County probate court. We ensure the petition complies with local rules for format, content, and supporting documentation. Properly prepared pleadings and clear, organized exhibits help the court and interested parties understand the basis for the requested change and streamline the court’s review process.
After filing, we arrange for service of the petition and related documents on all interested parties, following statutory requirements for notice. Proper service gives beneficiaries and other parties a chance to respond or object and preserves the court’s jurisdiction to decide the matter. We track response deadlines and assist clients in evaluating any objections that arise. Timely and correct service reduces the risk of procedural challenges and keeps the matter moving toward resolution.
We prepare clients for court hearings by organizing evidence, drafting declarations, and developing arguments that explain the need for modification. Where appropriate, we also pursue negotiations to resolve disputes outside of court and present settlement agreements to the judge for approval. If objections remain, we represent clients at the hearing, respond to opposing arguments, and seek orders that implement the most appropriate and lawful modification consistent with the trust’s intent and California law.
Once the court grants a modification, the final step is implementing the order through revised trust records, asset transfers, and communications with financial institutions. Trustees must update trust documents and fiduciary records to reflect the new terms and take any administrative actions the order authorizes. We assist with preparing revised trust instruments or certified copies of the court order for banks, title companies, and other third parties. Proper implementation ensures the modification achieves its intended effect without creating new administrative problems.
After a successful petition, trustees should obtain certified copies of the court order and update trust records to show the modification. We help prepare the necessary documentation and advise on presenting these records to banks, brokers, and title companies. Proper documentation prevents third-party refusal to follow the revised terms and supports smooth asset administration. Keeping beneficiaries informed of the implemented changes also helps avoid misunderstandings and fosters compliance with the modified provisions.
Following modification, trustees must administer the trust according to the new terms and maintain records demonstrating compliance with the court order. Continued attention to fiduciary duties and communications with beneficiaries ensures that distributions and management actions proceed without incident. If further changes become necessary, the process for additional modifications or clarifications will depend on the nature of the requested changes and any residual limitations in the trust instrument. We remain available to advise on subsequent steps and to help implement ongoing administration requirements.
Courts consider a range of reasons when evaluating trust modification petitions, including evidence of drafting errors, ambiguities, changed family circumstances, tax or administrative concerns, and settlement agreements among beneficiaries. A petition may also seek to implement a grantor’s clarified intent when the written document fails to reflect that intent accurately. The court examines the factual record and applicable statutes to decide whether the proposed modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and is legally permissible under California law. Supporting a petition often requires clear documentation such as the trust instrument, amendments, declarations from trustees or beneficiaries, and any records that show the grantor’s intent. Demonstrating the practical need for the change and how it benefits or protects interested parties helps the court assess the request. Well-prepared factual evidence and a sound legal basis increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling while minimizing the potential for disputes among beneficiaries.
Individuals with standing to file a trust modification petition typically include trustees, beneficiaries, and others who have a direct interest in the trust’s administration or distributions. The specific parties who qualify can vary based on the trust’s terms and the nature of the proposed change. Identifying and properly notifying all interested parties is important because the court must give them an opportunity to object or consent before approving substantive modifications. In many cases, trustees initiate petitions when they need judicial approval to take an action not plainly authorized by the trust instrument. Beneficiaries also may file petitions to correct an error or to request a construction of ambiguous terms. Proper legal guidance helps determine who should file and ensures the petition is presented by a party with the required standing under California law.
Yes, beneficiaries can sometimes modify a trust without court involvement when all interested parties agree and the trust instrument or statutes allow amendments by consent. Documenting written consents and updating trust records can achieve an effective modification while avoiding court costs and public filings. This informal approach is often the fastest and least intrusive option when beneficiaries are aligned and the change is administrative or noncontroversial. However, when agreement cannot be reached among all interested parties, or when the modification would alter core beneficiary rights or raise legal or tax issues, court approval is typically necessary. Consulting with counsel early helps determine whether informal agreement is legally sufficient or if a petition is the appropriate and secure path.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with case complexity, local court schedules, and whether objections are filed. Simple petitions with consenting beneficiaries can be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months. Contested matters or cases requiring extensive factual development or hearings can take longer, potentially several months to over a year depending on discovery needs and court availability. Preparing the petition thoroughly and communicating with interested parties early may shorten the process. Promptly addressing procedural issues such as correct service and complete supporting documentation reduces delays. Your legal representative can provide a more specific estimate based on the facts of your case and the procedural posture in San Bernardino County courts.
Common documentation includes the trust instrument with all amendments, deeds or asset records, beneficiary designation forms, bank or brokerage statements, and any written communications or notes that evidence the grantor’s intent. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who can attest to relevant facts are often necessary to explain the circumstances prompting the modification. When medical or financial incapacity is involved, relevant medical records or financial statements may be included as exhibits. Organizing these materials before filing helps present a coherent factual record to the court. Accurate, well-documented evidence supports the legal arguments in the petition and helps the court evaluate whether the requested change is warranted under the trust’s purpose and California law.
Not every trust modification petition results in an oral hearing; some matters may be decided on the written submissions if local rules and the judge permit. However, hearings are common when objections exist or when the court requires clarification on factual or legal issues. The scheduling of a hearing depends on the case’s complexity and the court’s calendar, and interested parties will receive notice of any scheduled hearing dates. If a hearing is set, parties have the opportunity to present testimony and argument, and the court may ask questions or request additional evidence. Being prepared with organized exhibits and witness declarations improves the presentation at any hearing and helps the court reach an informed decision.
Objections to a trust modification petition are typically filed by interested parties who believe the proposed change is improper, prejudicial, or not supported by facts. The court considers objections as part of the review process and may require additional evidence or argument to resolve contested points. Objections can lead to negotiation or mediation to narrow issues, or a hearing where the judge weighs competing evidence and interprets the trust instrument under applicable law. Responding to objections requires addressing the factual and legal concerns raised, often through supplemental declarations, documentary evidence, or testimony. Courts aim to balance the rights of all interested parties and will not grant modifications that unfairly prejudice beneficiaries or conflict with the grantor’s intent.
If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order specifying the approved modifications and any conditions for implementation. The order provides clear instructions for trustees to update trust records, transfer assets if authorized, and take actions consistent with the revised terms. Granting the petition creates a public record that reduces ambiguity and assists third parties in recognizing the amended terms for administration purposes. If the court denies the petition, the trust remains in its original form and interested parties continue administering it according to its existing provisions. Denial may be based on insufficient evidence, legal barriers, or conflicts with the trust’s purpose. In some cases, parties may negotiate alternative solutions or refine their petition for a future filing.
A court order approving a modification can provide trustees with protection against later claims for actions taken pursuant to that order, provided trustees adhere to the court’s terms and applicable fiduciary duties. Judicial approval clarifies authority and reduces the risk of personal liability for trustees who implement the approved changes. This protection is particularly valuable when trustees must take actions that are not explicitly authorized in the original trust instrument. To maximize protection, trustees should follow the court order precisely, maintain detailed records of actions taken, and communicate with beneficiaries about the implementation steps. Seeking legal guidance before and during implementation ensures compliance with both the order and fiduciary obligations.
Costs for pursuing a trust modification petition vary with the complexity of the case, the need for evidence gathering, and whether contested hearings are required. Expenses typically include filing fees, costs for serving documents, and attorney fees for drafting pleadings, preparing exhibits, and representing parties at hearings. When matters are contested, additional costs such as discovery, expert consultations, or extended litigation can increase total expenses. Pursuing agreement among beneficiaries or using simpler administrative remedies can reduce costs when appropriate. An initial consultation helps estimate likely fees based on the facts and procedural needs, and counsel can suggest cost-effective approaches where possible. Transparent communication about fees and budgets guides decision-making throughout the process.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas