If you are considering changing the terms of a trust in Phelan or elsewhere in San Bernardino County, a trust modification petition may be necessary to reflect new circumstances or correct unintended language. This page explains what a trust modification petition involves, who may petition the court, and how the process typically unfolds under California law. We discuss common reasons clients seek modifications, paperwork and filing steps, and practical considerations for beneficiaries and trustees. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in preparing clear petitions and navigating the court process so changes are implemented smoothly and with minimal disruption.
Trust modification petitions can resolve issues such as changed financial situations, beneficiary needs, ambiguous terms, or events that were unforeseen when the trust was created. Whether the goal is to adjust distribution timing, add or remove a beneficiary, or correct drafting errors, the petition must show the court why modification is appropriate under the Probate Code. We outline statutory grounds, evidence commonly submitted, and possible outcomes the court may order. Understanding the legal standards and likely timelines helps clients make informed decisions and reduces the risk of disputes among interested parties during the modification process.
Filing a trust modification petition offers a formal way to update a trust when informal changes are not possible or when the original trust document prevents straightforward amendments. Benefits include clarifying intent, ensuring beneficiaries receive intended assets, correcting administrative or drafting mistakes, and addressing changed family or financial circumstances. A properly drafted petition can prevent future litigation by resolving ambiguities and documenting court-approved changes. The process provides legal authority for trustees to act under the modified terms, reducing uncertainty for financial institutions, beneficiaries, and other stakeholders who rely on a clear court order.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California, including Phelan and San Bernardino County, with focused guidance on trust administration and modification matters. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, strategic planning, and clear communication with all interested parties to reduce conflict and streamline court interaction. We work closely with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to gather the facts that support a modification request and present those facts persuasively to the court. Clients appreciate practical solutions, responsiveness, and an emphasis on minimizing stress and cost while achieving necessary trust changes.
A trust modification petition asks a probate court to change the terms of an existing trust when direct amendment is not possible or when the change must be approved by the court to be effective. California law provides pathways for modification when all beneficiaries consent, when terms are ambiguous, or when circumstances have changed significantly from those contemplated by the settlor. The petition typically identifies the trust, the petitioner’s interest, proposed changes, and the legal basis for relief. Supporting evidence often includes declarations, trust documents, financial statements, and notice to interested parties to ensure full transparency in the process.
The court evaluates petitions based on statutory criteria and case law, considering whether the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and is equitable for beneficiaries. Common grounds include reformation to correct drafting mistakes, modifications to address changed circumstances such as disability or financial hardship, and amendments that conform the trust to tax or retirement plan requirements. The court may approve the petition as submitted, deny it, or impose conditions. Knowledge of procedural requirements and typical evidentiary support can significantly affect the petition’s outcome and the timeframe for achieving the desired change.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in probate court asking for alteration of a trust’s terms or construction of ambiguous provisions. The petition sets forth facts that justify the requested change, such as mutual mistake, clerical error, changed circumstances, or unanimous consent of beneficiaries. The process includes serving notice to interested parties, filing supporting declarations, and attending hearings if objections arise. The court’s role is to assess whether the modification reflects the settlor’s intentions or is otherwise warranted by law. Once ordered, the modification becomes part of the trust record and guides administration going forward.
Successful petitions commonly include a clear statement of the trust’s existing terms, a detailed description of the proposed modification, supporting evidence such as affidavits or declarations, and proof of notice to beneficiaries and interested parties. The procedural steps include drafting and filing the petition, serving required documents, responding to any objections, and presenting the matter to a judge if necessary. Timeframes vary depending on whether the petition is uncontested or opposed; contested matters can take longer. Accurate preparation and thorough documentation help reduce delays and limit the scope of disputes.
This glossary explains common terms encountered when pursuing a trust modification petition in California. Familiarity with these concepts helps clients understand filings, court orders, and trustee responsibilities. Terms covered include settlor, beneficiary, trustee, reformation, construction, notice, and interested party. Each term reflects how courts interpret actions and intentions related to trust administration and modification. Clear definitions make it easier to follow legal documents, meet notice requirements, and understand the options available when pursuing amendments or corrections to a trust document under state law.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and whose instructions guide the trust’s terms. The settlor’s intent is central when courts evaluate modification requests, and evidence such as draft documents, correspondence, and surrounding circumstances can shed light on that intent. In modification matters, petitions often seek to align the trust with what the settlor intended but did not clearly express in the written document. Understanding the settlor’s objectives helps the court choose remedies that preserve those original goals while addressing present-day concerns.
Reformation is a legal remedy that modifies a trust to correct an error or to reflect the true intent of the settlor when the written document does not accurately capture that intent. Reformation requires evidence that the discrepancy resulted from mistake or other valid reason under the law. The court reviews declarations, draft versions of documents, and other proof to decide whether reformation is appropriate. This remedy is often used to address drafting errors, omissions, or provisions that contradict other parts of the trust instrument.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity entitled to receive benefits or distributions from a trust. Beneficiaries have legal standing to receive notice of petitions that affect trust terms and may object to proposed modifications. The court considers beneficiary interests when evaluating petitions, balancing respect for the settlor’s intent with fairness among parties. Beneficiaries may include family members, charities, or institutions named in the trust, and their rights to information and accounting are protected under state law throughout modification proceedings.
Notice refers to the legal requirement to inform interested parties of a pending petition so they have an opportunity to respond. Interested parties typically include trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, and others with a potential stake in the trust. Proper notice procedures are essential to avoid later challenges to the court’s order. The petition must usually include proof of service, and failure to provide required notice can delay proceedings or invalidate actions taken. Courts examine notice carefully to ensure all affected parties have the chance to participate.
When a trust needs revision, options include informal trustee actions with beneficiary consent, executing a trust amendment if the settlor is able, or filing a formal petition with the court when direct amendment is not available. Informal approaches can be faster but require unanimous consent and clear authority. Amendments by the settlor are straightforward if the settlor has capacity and the trust permits amendments. Court petitions become necessary when there is ambiguity, dispute, incapacity, or when statutory authority is required. Each path has trade-offs in speed, privacy, and finality that clients should weigh carefully.
A limited approach can work when all beneficiaries and interested parties agree to a change and the trust allows the trustee to act on that consent. In such cases, beneficiaries may sign a written agreement or the trustee may document the consensus and proceed without court involvement. This path preserves privacy and can be quicker and less costly than a court petition. However, unanimous consent must be documented carefully and follow the trust’s terms and applicable statutes to ensure financial institutions and third parties accept and implement the change.
If the original settlor is alive and retains the legal capacity described in the trust document, they may execute an amendment directly, making formal court involvement unnecessary. Amending the trust this way is often the simplest option, as long as required formalities such as signatures and notarization are followed. This preserves confidentiality and reduces expense. The settlor should be advised to document the amendment carefully and to notify trustees and beneficiaries as appropriate so that future actions under the trust reflect the updated terms without confusion.
When beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes, or when some parties cannot be located for consent, a court petition may be the only way to resolve competing claims and secure a binding order. The formal process allows a judge to weigh evidence, interpret the trust instrument, and issue clear directives for administration. This reduces ongoing uncertainty and potential future litigation by establishing an authoritative record. While litigation can increase cost and duration, court involvement ensures disputed issues are resolved under legal standards rather than by informal compromise alone.
When a trust contains unclear language, conflicting clauses, or drafting mistakes, the trustee or beneficiaries may need a court ruling to clarify intent and direct administration. Courts can interpret ambiguous provisions, reform documents to correct mistakes, or authorize modifications that align the trust with the settlor’s known objectives. This formal approach provides certainty for trustees, financial institutions, and beneficiaries, ensuring that distributions and decisions follow a court-validated interpretation rather than relying on contested informal readings that could lead to disputes later.
A comprehensive, court-supervised approach can provide definitive answers and a legally enforceable record that clarifies rights and duties under a trust. Court approval can protect trustees from future claims, give third parties confidence to follow modified terms, and reduce the risk of additional disputes by placing changes on the public record. For complex situations involving incapacity, conflicting beneficiary interests, or sophisticated asset arrangements, the formal process ensures changes are made under clear legal authority, reducing uncertainty and streamlining future trust administration steps.
Pursuing a formal petition also allows consideration of ancillary legal needs, such as coordinating trust changes with retirement accounts, tax planning, or guardianship issues. Courts can issue tailored orders to address particular concerns, such as adjusting distribution schedules or directing trustees in handling specific assets. Although a court process may involve more time and expense at the outset, the long-term benefits often include greater stability for beneficiaries, clearer administrative instructions for trustees, and a reduced likelihood of costly litigation after the modification is implemented.
A court-ordered modification provides finality, creating a clear and enforceable framework that trustees and beneficiaries can rely on moving forward. This protection matters when institutions handling trust assets require proof of the trustee’s authority to act under changed terms. Court authorization limits subsequent challenges and helps ensure assets are distributed as intended or according to the modified plan. For trustees, the order reduces personal liability concerns; for beneficiaries, it secures clarity about rights and timelines for distributions or other trust actions.
When disputes involve competing interpretations, unusual assets, or beneficiaries with differing needs, a comprehensive court process enables resolution based on legal standards and evidentiary review. Courts can fashion remedies that address multiple concerns, such as modifying distribution terms or appointing a neutral third party to assist with administration. This approach reduces ambiguity and balances interests fairly, often preventing piecemeal disputes that could otherwise drain assets and harm family relationships over time.
Collecting all relevant trust documents, previous drafts, correspondence, financial statements, and records of beneficiary communications is essential when preparing a petition. Thorough documentation helps show the court the settlor’s likely intent and supports any claim of mistake, changed circumstances, or the need for reformation. Clear records also streamline the process by reducing discovery and the need for court-ordered follow-up. Ensure originals and notarized statements are available, and keep copies organized by date to present a coherent timeline of events that led to the requested modification.
Courts want clear reasons for changing trust terms that align with the settlor’s intent and the interests of beneficiaries. Prepare concise, well-supported explanations of why the modification is appropriate, including evidence of changed circumstances, clerical mistakes, or unanimous beneficiary consent where applicable. Anticipate potential objections and have documentation ready to respond. Clear legal and factual support increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduces the chance of contested hearings, making the process more efficient for all involved.
You might consider a trust modification petition if the trust no longer aligns with current family dynamics, asset values, or the settlor’s original intentions. Common scenarios include the need to change distributions due to beneficiary disability, adjust terms after significant financial shifts, correct drafting errors, or update trustee powers to accommodate new asset types. A petition can provide a formal, court-approved mechanism to make these changes when direct amendment is impossible or when not all parties can consent. It ensures modifications are enforceable and appropriately documented for future administration.
Other reasons to seek a petition include coordinating the trust with retirement accounts or life insurance arrangements, addressing tax or creditor concerns, or simplifying administration when the trust contains outdated provisions. When trustees face uncertainty about authority or beneficiaries disagree on how to proceed, a court order can provide clear direction and protection. Considering a petition early, before disputes escalate, can preserve assets and relationships by resolving issues proactively and establishing a legally sound path forward for trust management and distributions.
Typical situations prompting a petition include settlor incapacity, beneficiary incapacity or special needs, changes in family structure like divorce or death, discovery of drafting errors, or the need to update outdated distribution schedules. Other triggers involve previously unforeseen tax consequences or the need to align trust terms with retirement plan requirements. These circumstances often create legal or practical obstacles to administering the trust as written, making a court-supervised modification the most reliable way to resolve the issue and ensure the trust serves its intended purpose going forward.
When the settlor becomes incapacitated or passes away without having made necessary amendments, trustees and beneficiaries may discover the trust does not reflect current needs. A petition can address gaps, clarify trustee authority, or correct provisions that cannot be changed by the settlor. This formal approach ensures changes are implemented under legal authority and reduces uncertainty for financial institutions and beneficiaries, which helps trustees manage assets and distribute benefits according to the court-approved modification.
Drafting mistakes, ambiguous clauses, or conflicting provisions in the trust document often require judicial interpretation or reformation to correct the record. Courts consider extrinsic evidence, such as drafts and communications, to determine the settlor’s intent and may reorder or rephrase provisions accordingly. Addressing these defects through a petition prevents misadministration and future disputes, providing clarity and reducing the chance of protracted litigation among beneficiaries over unclear language.
Significant changes such as divorce, remarriage, the birth of a child, or major shifts in asset composition can make a trust out of step with current realities. A petition allows the court to authorize adjustments that reflect these new circumstances, balancing the settlor’s intent with present needs. This type of modification can help ensure that assets are distributed appropriately, that guardianship or care provisions remain effective, and that trustees have the authority needed to manage contemporary financial responsibilities.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local assistance for residents of Phelan and surrounding areas seeking trust modifications. We help clients understand filing requirements, develop supporting documentation, and communicate with trustees, beneficiaries, and courts. Our team can assist with preparing petitions, serving notice, responding to objections, and negotiating resolutions where possible. Whether you need an uncontested change or must present evidence to the court, we focus on practical solutions to move the process forward while preserving family privacy and protecting trust assets from unnecessary delay.
Clients choose our firm for attentive guidance on trust modification matters and a methodical approach to preparing petitions that clearly present the facts and legal basis for change. We prioritize communication with all interested parties to reduce surprises and promote resolution where possible. Our practice emphasizes careful document preparation, compliance with notice requirements, and proactive planning to limit the need for contested hearings. This-focused approach helps clients achieve modifications that align with the settlor’s intentions and meet the practical needs of trustees and beneficiaries.
We work to minimize cost and delay by identifying uncontested pathways and seeking presumptive remedies when available, while remaining prepared to litigate when necessary to protect client interests. Our team coordinates with financial institutions, guardians, and other professionals to ensure changes are implemented smoothly once the court issues an order. Clear timelines and regular updates help clients understand the process and what to expect at each stage, reducing uncertainty during a period that can otherwise be stressful for families and trustees.
From initial evaluation through filing and final order, our firm aims to provide practical legal solutions that respect family dynamics and minimize conflict. We prepare thorough petitions, anticipate likely objections, and propose reasonable remedies to the court when modifications are necessary. Our goal is to obtain clear, enforceable orders that trustees and beneficiaries can rely on, protecting trust assets and facilitating efficient administration in accordance with the court-approved modifications.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust and related documents, followed by a fact-gathering stage to collect evidence supporting the requested modification. We identify all interested parties, prepare the petition and necessary declarations, and ensure proper service and proof of notice. If disputes arise, we engage in negotiation and mediation efforts where appropriate to seek resolution before trial. When a hearing is required, we present a focused record to the court and request a tailored order that addresses the specific changes needed for administration and distribution.
The initial review evaluates the trust document, any related agreements, and the circumstances motivating modification, such as changes in beneficiaries or discovered drafting errors. We assess whether an uncontested amendment or a court petition is required and outline likely timelines and costs. This stage includes identifying potential interested parties and determining the evidence needed to support the petition. Clear planning at this stage often reduces delays later by anticipating objections and assembling required documentation in advance.
We examine the trust instrument, prior drafts, correspondence, and any financial records that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, and witnesses may be prepared to establish factual foundations for the requested modification. Thorough evidence collection strengthens the petition and helps address objections promptly. Early identification of document issues allows us to propose narrowly tailored modifications that the court can adopt without broad, unnecessary changes to the trust structure.
Identifying and locating all interested parties is essential to meet statutory notice obligations. We prepare and serve required notices, document proof of service, and address any issues related to unavailable or unknown parties via appropriate court procedures. Proper notice preserves the validity of any resulting court order and reduces the risk of procedural challenges. Attention to detail in this step avoids delays and ensures that all stakeholders have the opportunity to participate in resolving the requested modification.
After drafting the petition and gathering supporting materials, we file the petition in the appropriate probate court and serve all interested parties according to statutory rules. The filing initiates the court’s review, and we submit declarations and exhibits that document the need for modification. Proper filing includes paying applicable fees, formatting documents per local rules, and preparing proof of service. Timely and accurate filings help keep the matter on schedule and reduce the likelihood of administrative rejections or procedural delays.
We prepare a concise petition that explains the requested modification, references the legal basis, and attaches supporting documentation. This includes drafting proposed orders the court can sign if it grants relief. Attention to procedural detail and clear presentation of facts increases the likelihood the court will grant the requested changes without extensive supplemental briefing. Accurate exhibits and organized declarations help judges evaluate the matter efficiently and make informed decisions.
Once the petition is filed, we ensure all required parties are served and monitor responses or objections. If objections arise, we evaluate potential resolution strategies, such as negotiation, mediation, or targeted supplemental filings to address specific concerns. Tracking deadlines for responsive pleadings and preparing tactical responses protects the case’s momentum. Keeping parties informed and attempting resolution where possible often shortens the process and reduces costs compared to full contested hearings.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present a focused case supported by declarations and exhibits and advocate for an order tailored to the trust’s needs. The judge may grant the modification, deny it, or issue a conditional order requiring additional steps. After an order is entered, we assist with implementing changes, notifying financial institutions, updating trustee instructions, and preparing any necessary supporting documentation such as certifications of trust. Our goal is to ensure the court’s directives become effective in practice and that administration proceeds smoothly.
At hearing, we present the factual record and legal arguments showing why the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or is otherwise appropriate under law. We seek clear, narrowly drawn orders that provide trustees with the authority needed to act without ambiguity. Effective presentation focuses on relevant evidence, anticipates likely counterarguments, and proposes reasonable remedies the court can adopt to facilitate trust administration going forward.
After the court issues an order, we assist with implementing changes by preparing updated trust records, serving the order on financial institutions, and providing trustees with written instructions needed to comply. Implementation may include updating account registrations, revising distribution protocols, and preparing certifications of trust or other documents institutions require. Ensuring accurate and timely implementation prevents administrative issues and helps trustees carry out their duties under the modified trust terms.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate court asking for an alteration or clarification of a trust document when direct amendment is not feasible or when court approval is required. Typical reasons include correcting drafting mistakes, addressing changed circumstances that affect distributions, or resolving ambiguous provisions. The petition lays out the existing terms, the proposed change, and legal grounds for the modification, and includes evidence such as declarations, trust drafts, or documentation of changed conditions. Notice to interested parties is a required component to ensure transparency and fairness in the process. Courts review petitions by examining the settlor’s intent, the adequacy of supporting evidence, and whether the proposed change serves the trust’s purposes without unfairly harming beneficiaries. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that becomes part of the trust record and guides future administration. If objections arise, hearings may be held to resolve disputes. The process can vary in length and complexity depending on whether the petition is contested, how many interested parties are involved, and the clarity of the supporting documentation.
In California, parties with a legal interest in the trust may file a petition to modify its terms. This typically includes trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes heirs who may be affected by the requested change. The specific standing rules depend on the nature of the modification sought and the trust instrument itself. When the settlor is alive and retains capacity, the settlor usually has the simplest path to change terms directly, making a petition unnecessary. When the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, interested parties often must rely on court procedures to obtain a binding modification. Before filing, it is important to identify and locate all interested parties so proper notice can be given according to statutory requirements. Courts require sufficient notice so affected parties have the opportunity to object or participate. Failure to notify required parties can delay proceedings or lead to orders being set aside later. Proper identification and service help ensure the petition proceeds efficiently and any resulting court order is durable against later challenges.
The court requires evidence that supports the requested modification and demonstrates why the change aligns with the settlor’s intent or is otherwise justified by law. Common evidence includes signed drafts and previous versions of the trust, communications or notes showing the settlor’s intentions, financial documents illustrating changed circumstances, and declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or witnesses. Where reformation is claimed due to mistake, evidence must show the document fails to reflect the settlor’s true intent and that a correction is warranted. Clear, organized documentation reduces the chance of contested hearings. In some cases, unanimous written consent from all beneficiaries can simplify the process and reduce the need for extensive proof. When consent is not unanimous or when parties cannot be located, the court requires formal proof and may schedule a hearing to evaluate contested facts. Courts weigh the credibility of declarations and documentary evidence to determine whether the requested modification should be ordered and under what specific terms.
The time required for a trust modification petition varies based on complexity and whether the petition is contested. An uncontested matter with full beneficiary consent and clear documentation may be resolved within a few weeks to a few months, depending on local court schedules and filing requirements. Preparing accurate petitions, serving notice promptly, and addressing any administrative requirements can shorten the process. Faster outcomes are more likely when parties cooperate and documentation clearly supports the requested change. Contested petitions take longer, potentially several months to a year or more, depending on the number of parties involved, discovery needs, and court availability. Hearings and litigation-related activities such as motion practice or mediation add time. Anticipating possible disputes and attempting negotiation or alternative dispute resolution early can help reduce delays and the overall time to resolution.
Yes, trust modification petitions and related court orders typically become part of the public record when filed in probate court. This means details about the petition, the parties involved, and the court’s decision may be accessible to the public. Sensitive information such as asset values or personal medical details is sometimes included in filings, so parties often take care to limit disclosure where possible and use redaction or sealed filings only when legally permitted and justified. If privacy is a priority, consider alternatives like securing unanimous beneficiary agreements or seeking narrow orders that avoid unnecessary disclosure. Consult with counsel early to evaluate options and minimize public exposure of sensitive details while ensuring the petition meets legal requirements and achieves the necessary modification.
Yes, beneficiaries have the right to oppose a proposed modification and raise objections to the court. Objecting parties can file formal opposition documents, present declarations or evidence, and request hearings to contest the petition’s legal basis or factual assertions. The court considers objections seriously, weighing competing evidence and the interests of all parties before deciding whether to grant, modify, or deny the requested relief. Objecting can lead to negotiation or mediation efforts as the court encourages resolution where feasible. Opposition may extend the timeline and increase costs, so proactive communication with beneficiaries and efforts to resolve disagreements can reduce the chance of contested proceedings. In some situations, partial agreements or narrowly tailored petitions can address concerns and limit the scope of disputes, helping achieve results without protracted litigation.
Common outcomes of a trust modification petition include full approval of the requested changes, partial approval with specific conditions or clarifications, or denial if the petitioner fails to meet legal standards. Courts may order reformation to correct mistakes, interpret ambiguous language to reflect the settlor’s intent, or grant modifications that align the trust with current circumstances. Outcomes can also address trustee authority by expanding or narrowing powers to ensure proper administration under modified terms. In contested cases, settlements or negotiated resolutions are also common, where parties agree to mutually acceptable changes that the court then formalizes. Even when the court declines the precise relief requested, it may suggest alternative remedies or direct further proceedings to resolve outstanding issues while protecting beneficiary interests.
A modification can alter a trustee’s duties, powers, or distribution instructions, and a court order will instruct the trustee on how to proceed under the new terms. Trustees must follow the court-approved terms and may need to take specific administrative steps such as updating account registrations, changing distribution schedules, or obtaining additional approvals for certain transactions. Clear orders make it easier for trustees to act confidently and reduce the risk of future disputes or personal liability for acting under modified directives. Trustees should document all actions taken to implement a court order and communicate with beneficiaries about changes. If the modification increases the trustee’s responsibilities, the court may also address compensation or bond requirements. Proper implementation and documentation ensure trustees meet their fiduciary obligations while carrying out the modified plan.
Alternatives to filing a petition include executing a trust amendment if the settlor is able, obtaining unanimous written consents from beneficiaries for an informal change, or using mediation to reach agreement among interested parties. These options can preserve privacy and reduce cost and time compared to court proceedings. Whether an alternative is available depends on the trust’s amendment provisions, the settlor’s capacity, and whether all interested parties can be located and agree to the proposed changes. When alternatives are not feasible due to incapacity, dissent, or legal constraints, a formal petition may be the only viable path to create a binding and enforceable modification. Evaluating alternatives early can help determine the most efficient and appropriate route for achieving the desired outcome while considering privacy and expense.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary widely depending on local court fees, the complexity of the matter, and whether the petition is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation and cooperative beneficiaries can be completed at modest cost, primarily covering filing fees and reasonable attorney time for drafting and service. Contested matters require more attorney time for discovery, motions, and hearings, increasing expense accordingly. Parties should expect higher costs when multiple rounds of litigation or complex evidentiary issues arise. Discussing fees and likely scenarios early helps clients budget for the process. Many firms offer initial consultations to evaluate whether an uncontested approach is possible or whether court involvement is likely. Clear communication about potential expenses and strategies to limit costs can help clients make informed decisions about pursuing modification through the courts.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas