A Heggstad petition is a focused legal action used in California probate and trust administration when property meant to belong to a trust was never formally transferred before a person died. If you live in Piñon Hills and are dealing with assets that were intended to be held in a revocable living trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize that those assets should be treated as trust property. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide clear guidance on preparing and filing these petitions while explaining possible outcomes and timelines to help families close estate matters efficiently and respectfully.
Navigating a Heggstad petition involves careful documentation, review of trust terms, and a clear demonstration of the decedent’s intent to include particular assets in the trust. Our team in San Jose and Piñon Hills works with Trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to gather deeds, account statements, trust documents, and witness statements that support the petition. We emphasize clear communication and thorough preparation to reduce delays and contested issues. If you are handling an estate or administering a trust and discover assets that were not retitled, learning whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate early can save time, expense, and emotional strain for everyone involved.
A properly filed Heggstad petition can preserve the intent behind a trust and prevent assets from passing through a more time-consuming probate process, helping beneficiaries receive what the decedent intended without unnecessary delay. Recognizing trust property through the petition can maintain privacy, because trust administration typically avoids full probate court proceedings. This approach can also reduce costs and administrative burden compared with a full probate estate for the same assets. For Trustees and family members, successfully resolving title issues through a Heggstad petition restores clarity to estate records, allows distributions to proceed under trust terms, and minimizes potential disputes among heirs or creditors.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose and serving Piñon Hills and surrounding areas, focus on estate planning and trust administration matters including Heggstad petitions. Our approach combines careful legal analysis with practical guidance for Trustees and beneficiaries navigating property titling issues. We prepare petitions and supporting affidavits, handle communication with courts and interested parties, and assist with related documents such as certifications of trust, pourover wills, and asset assignment forms. Our goal is to help families resolve trust property questions efficiently while protecting their rights and ensuring the decedent’s wishes are honored in compliance with California law.
A Heggstad petition asks a court to treat assets that remained in the deceased person’s name as though they had been transferred to the trust. This often arises when a settlor intended certain property to be part of their revocable living trust but failed to retitle or formally assign the asset before death. The petition requires evidence showing the settlor’s intent, the trust’s terms, and the connection between the asset and the trust. Typical evidence includes the trust document, transfer forms, account statements, deeds, and affidavits from witnesses or professionals who assisted with estate planning. Understanding these elements helps Trustees decide whether a petition is necessary.
The process for a Heggstad petition includes drafting a complaint, assembling documentary evidence, providing notice to interested parties, and appearing before the probate court if needed. Courts evaluate the settlor’s intent, whether the asset was meant to be in the trust, and whether any competing claims exist. Outcomes may include a judicial declaration that the asset belongs to the trust, an order for transfer to the Trustee, or a decision requiring further proceedings. Anticipating potential challenges from heirs or creditors and preparing persuasive documentation can help the Trustee achieve a favorable result while minimizing delay and cost.
A Heggstad petition is a legal vehicle in California probate law used to confirm that certain assets should be considered trust property despite the decedent failing to retitle them before death. The petition explains the circumstances that led to the omission and sets out supporting facts, such as the settlor’s trust instructions and any actions taken to move the property into the trust. The court’s role is to determine whether the trust’s terms and the settlor’s intent justify treating the property as having been held in the trust, allowing the Trustee to administer the assets under trust terms rather than through probate distribution procedures.
Successful petitions are grounded in thorough documentation and clear factual narratives. Essential elements include the trust document, proof of intent such as correspondence or draft assignment forms, records showing attempts to transfer property, and statements from those involved in the planning process. After filing, the Trustee must provide proper notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and potential creditors. Some matters resolve on declarations and evidence alone, while others may require hearings. Careful preparation reduces contested issues, so Trustees often benefit from targeted legal support to assemble the strongest possible record before presenting the petition to the court.
When dealing with a Heggstad petition, it helps to be familiar with common terms like settlor, Trustor, Trustee, beneficiary, probate, reformation, and transfer on death. Understanding these terms makes it easier to review documents and communicate with the court and other interested parties. This glossary provides plain-language explanations that clarify roles and procedures involved in trust administration and title correction petitions. Clear terminology reduces confusion, helps families make informed decisions, and supports a smoother process when seeking judicial recognition of trust property under California law.
The settlor, also called the trustor, is the person who created the trust and placed assets into it or intended to do so. In Heggstad petition matters, the settlor’s documented intent is central. Evidence of that intent may consist of the trust document itself, drafts, communications, or instructions provided to attorneys or financial institutions. When property remains in the settlor’s individual name after death, the court examines these materials to determine whether the settlor meant for those items to be trust property. Clarifying the settlor’s intent is the primary task of the petition and supporting evidence.
The Trustee is the person or entity appointed to hold and manage trust assets according to the trust document’s terms. In a Heggstad petition case, the Trustee typically files the petition to establish that certain assets belong to the trust. The Trustee must present evidence of the settlor’s intent and may need to notify beneficiaries and other interested parties. Once the court recognizes the asset as trust property, the Trustee can proceed with administration, including paying debts, distributing assets, and managing trust affairs consistent with the document and applicable law.
A beneficiary is a person or organization named in the trust to receive benefits from trust assets. Beneficiaries have an interest in the outcome of a Heggstad petition because the court’s decision affects how assets are distributed. Beneficiaries may receive notices and have the opportunity to object if they believe the asset should pass through probate or be divided in another manner. Understanding beneficiaries’ rights and expectations enables Trustees to handle communication carefully and address any concerns before or during court proceedings to reduce disputes.
Probate is the court-supervised process for distributing assets of someone who died without title transfers to a trust or named beneficiaries, while trust administration typically occurs privately under the trust’s terms without full probate involvement. The distinction matters in Heggstad petition cases because confirming assets as trust property may avoid probate for those assets, streamlining distribution and maintaining privacy. Courts consider the settlor’s intent and available evidence when deciding whether to permit trust administration treatment instead of probate, which can influence timelines, costs, and the level of public disclosure.
When an asset intended for a trust remains in an individual’s name at death, there are different paths to resolve ownership. A Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition that the asset belongs to the trust, which can be quicker and less public than a full probate action. Alternatively, initiating probate will place all contested assets within the probate estate for distribution under state law, which may be longer and more costly. Trustees and families should weigh the relative time, expense, and privacy considerations and choose the route most aligned with the decedent’s wishes and the beneficiaries’ needs.
A targeted Heggstad petition is often sufficient when the trust document and related records clearly show the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Examples include written trust provisions, drafts of transfer documents, correspondence with financial institutions, or statements by witnesses who assisted with planning. When such documentation exists, the court can often resolve title questions without opening a full probate estate. Using the petition in this context can conserve resources, maintain confidentiality, and allow the Trustee to administer the asset under the trust’s instructions quickly and efficiently.
A Heggstad petition works well when there are few heirs or parties likely to contest ownership and when potential objections can be addressed with clear evidence. If family members are generally in agreement about the trust’s terms and the decedent’s intent, the court can often issue orders recognizing trust property with minimal delay. When disputes appear unlikely, the targeted petition avoids the broader notice and administration requirements of probate, reducing administrative burdens while protecting the intended distributions for beneficiaries.
Comprehensive legal proceedings may be required when assets are numerous, title issues are complex, or competing heirs assert conflicting claims. Situations involving real estate, closely held business interests, or accounts with ambiguous beneficiary designations can present complications that a simple petition cannot fully resolve. When significant disputes or third-party creditor claims are present, an expanded legal approach helps ensure all parties are heard and that transfers or distributions occur under court supervision to protect the estate and beneficiaries from future challenges or liability.
If beneficiaries or heirs challenge the decedent’s intent, or if there are competing wills or trust documents, a broader probate action may be necessary to fully resolve ownership and distribution issues. Proving intent in contested circumstances often involves testimony, forensic document review, and a robust factual record. When the settlor’s intentions are disputed, pursuing a comprehensive legal path through probate ensures that courts can examine all relevant evidence, rule on competing claims, and provide a clear, enforceable resolution that protects the parties and the integrity of the estate process.
A comprehensive approach can provide certainty, broader protection from future challenges, and full accounting of assets and liabilities. When matters are complex or contested, engaging in a thorough legal process helps avoid piecemeal resolution that could leave lingering disputes. A complete record and court supervision can also provide finality, making it less likely that claimants will raise issues later. For Trustees and beneficiaries who value clarity and closure, this approach ensures that distributions and transfers are performed under a definitive court order that addresses all competing concerns.
Comprehensive handling of estate and trust matters supports accurate inventorying of assets, resolution of creditor claims, and compliance with tax and reporting obligations. It also allows for coordinated resolution when multiple jurisdictions, complex property types, or third-party claims are involved. While it can require more time and expense upfront, a careful legal strategy can reduce long-term risk and create a structured plan for distributing assets in line with the decedent’s wishes. The result is a clearer outcome for beneficiaries and fewer opportunities for future litigation.
One major benefit of a comprehensive legal approach is finality: court-supervised resolution helps prevent later challenges to asset distribution. When the court has examined evidence, addressed competing claims, and issued orders for distribution, beneficiaries can move forward with confidence. This broader protection is especially helpful for assets with uncertain ownership, disputed beneficiary designations, or situations where creditors may have claims. The clarity provided by court rulings reduces the chance of additional litigation and provides a documented path for trustees and beneficiaries to follow.
A careful legal process ensures a thorough review of all assets, titles, and potential liabilities, promoting compliance with state rules and tax obligations. This level of scrutiny helps identify overlooked accounts, beneficiary designations, or creditor issues that could affect distribution. It also allows trustees to obtain court approval for complex transactions and provides a clear administrative pathway for handling debts and claims. Ultimately, this diligence reduces the risk of future disputes and helps preserve value for beneficiaries.
Start collecting all relevant documents as soon as you suspect a title issue. Important items include the trust instrument, deeds, bank and investment account statements, correspondence with financial institutions, and any draft assignment or transfer paperwork. Supporting statements from those who helped prepare the trust or discussed intent with the settlor can strengthen a petition. By organizing these records early, Trustees can reduce delays and present a clear, chronological record to the court and interested parties that explains why the asset should be treated as trust property.
Evaluate whether a targeted Heggstad petition or a broader probate action best meets your needs, balancing speed and privacy against the desire for court-supervised finality. For straightforward title corrections with strong supporting evidence, the petition can be quicker and less public. However, when disputes or complex assets exist, a more comprehensive proceeding may provide stronger protection against future claims. Carefully consider the nature of the asset, potential claimants, and long-term implications before selecting the legal path to correct title and administer the estate.
If you are administering a trust and discover property that remains in the decedent’s individual name, a Heggstad petition is a common remedy to align title with the trust’s terms. This service is appropriate when the settlor clearly intended the property to belong to the trust and when the Trustee wishes to avoid the longer, more public probate process for those assets. Filing the petition helps protect beneficiaries’ interests, maintains trust privacy, and can speed distributions. It also creates a documented court decision that clarifies ownership for third parties such as banks, real estate title companies, and government agencies.
People should consider this service when there is reasonable evidence of intent, when the Trustee needs legal authority to manage or transfer assets, or when title defects are preventing administration. Heggstad petitions can be especially useful with real estate, retirement accounts lacking beneficiary updates, or accounts that were never retitled after trust creation. Pursuing the petition early in the administration process reduces the risk of missed deadlines and allows the Trustee to move forward with confidence while preserving the decedent’s wishes and reducing administrative friction for beneficiaries.
Typical circumstances include real estate still in the decedent’s name, bank or investment accounts that were never changed to the Trustee, and situations where transfer paperwork was prepared but never completed. Life events such as declining health, last-minute decisions, or misunderstandings with financial institutions can result in assets not being retitled as intended. When the Trustee discovers these discrepancies, a Heggstad petition provides a way to align ownership with the trust’s terms without opening full probate for every affected asset, simplifying the administration process and protecting the decedent’s plan.
Real property may be intended to pass through a revocable living trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name due to oversight, delays in recording, or confusion about the retitling process. When this happens, the Trustee can pursue a Heggstad petition to request that the court recognize the property as trust asset. The petition should include the trust document, deeds, and any communications showing intent. Resolving real estate title through the petition helps clear title for sale or transfer and allows the Trustee to manage or distribute the property according to trust provisions.
Bank accounts, brokerage accounts, and retirement plan assets sometimes retain the decedent’s name due to incomplete paperwork or overlooked beneficiary designations. In such cases, a Heggstad petition can clarify that the account was meant to be held in trust. Supporting documentation may include account statements, correspondence with financial institutions, and draft transfer forms. Once the court recognizes an account as trust property, the Trustee gains authority to access, manage, or distribute funds under the trust terms, reducing administrative obstacles and facilitating timely distributions to beneficiaries.
Sometimes transfer documents were prepared but never finalized, or an asset was intended to be assigned to the trust but the assignment was not recorded. Mistaken filings or incomplete paperwork can create ambiguity about ownership at death, leading the Trustee to file a Heggstad petition. Evidence such as draft assignments, unrecorded deeds, and communications with advisors can support the petition. By presenting this evidence, the Trustee can ask the court to correct title in line with the settlor’s intent and allow trust administration to proceed according to the written instrument.
We provide local support to Trustees, beneficiaries, and family members in Piñon Hills and nearby San Bernardino County communities who face title discrepancies after a loved one’s death. Our office coordinates document collection, prepares petitions and declarations, and ensures required notices reach interested parties. We work to minimize the time needed for court resolution and to reduce the administrative burden on families already coping with loss. Call the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 for a practical conversation about whether filing a Heggstad petition is the right step for your situation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handle trust administration matters including Heggstad petitions with attention to detail and practical guidance. We assist Trustees in assembling the strongest possible record by collecting trust documents, deeds, draft transfers, and witness statements that support the settlor’s intent. Our team prepares court filings, manages required notices, and represents Trustees throughout any proceedings. We focus on efficient resolution to reduce stress and administrative costs while ensuring that distributions proceed according to the trust’s terms and applicable California rules.
We place emphasis on clear communication and responsiveness so clients understand each step of the process and the timeline involved. From initial document review to filing the petition and addressing responses from interested parties, we provide practical recommendations tailored to the facts at hand. Our goal is to help trustees and families make informed decisions that protect beneficiaries and reduce the risk of future disputes. We work collaboratively with financial institutions, title companies, and probate courts to resolve title issues smoothly.
Our approach balances procedural diligence with cost-conscious planning, focusing on documents and strategies that often resolve title questions without prolonged litigation. In matters that do require additional court involvement, we prepare a thorough factual record to support the Trustee’s position. Whether the issue is a single account or complex real estate holdings, we help clients choose the pathway that best safeguards the decedent’s intentions while taking into account timing, costs, and potential objections from heirs or creditors.
Our process begins with a document review to identify assets and evidence that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. We then advise on the most efficient path forward—whether a focused petition or a broader probate action—and outline necessary steps, such as notice to interested parties and evidence collection. After preparing the petition and supporting declarations, we file with the appropriate probate court and monitor responses. If a hearing is needed, we present the factual record and legal basis for recognition of the asset as trust property, working to obtain a clear court order that permits administration to continue.
The first step is a careful review of the trust and related documents to determine whether the asset was intended to be in the trust and what evidence exists to support that intent. We request deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, draft transfer documents, and any communications with advisors or institutions. This stage also includes identifying interested parties who must be notified. The goal is to build a clear factual record that supports a petition and to identify potential areas of disagreement that may require additional documentation or negotiation.
During this phase, we examine trust provisions and related documents to compile evidence showing the settlor’s intent. We create a timeline of events and gather affidavits or declarations from individuals familiar with the settlor’s planning. This documentation forms the backbone of the petition, explaining why the asset should be considered trust property. Preparing a well-organized evidentiary package reduces procedural delays and strengthens the Trustee’s position when presenting the matter to the probate court.
We identify beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors who must receive notice and prepare formal communications to explain the basis for the petition. Early outreach may resolve questions or objections before court involvement. Providing transparent information and an opportunity to review supporting documents helps limit surprises and can lead to quicker, uncontested resolutions. When disputes arise, early communication also allows for negotiation or supplemental evidence collection to address concerns prior to a hearing.
After assembling evidence and preparing declarations, we draft the Heggstad petition and required court forms, file them with the appropriate probate court, and serve notice on interested parties. The filing explains the factual basis for treating the asset as trust property and includes supporting documentary exhibits. Serving notice in accordance with court rules ensures the process is procedurally sound. This formal step starts the court’s consideration and gives other parties the opportunity to respond, object, or seek additional information if necessary.
We prepare a petition that lays out the facts, attaches the trust document and evidence, and includes affidavits or declarations from witnesses or advisors who can confirm intent. Properly drafted filings anticipate common questions and present the facts in a clear chronological manner. By addressing potential issues up front, the Trustee increases the chance of a smooth hearing or an uncontested order recognizing the trust interest in the asset, saving time and reducing expenses for beneficiaries.
Following filing, we serve required notices to beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors under California probate rules. We monitor responses, address inquiries, and, when appropriate, negotiate or mediate concerns to avoid contested hearings. If objections are raised, we evaluate the issues and identify additional evidence or procedural steps to address them. Managing responses promptly and professionally helps prevent unnecessary litigation and keeps the process moving toward resolution.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the factual and documentary record supporting the petition and respond to any objections. When the court is satisfied the facts demonstrate the settlor’s intent, it may issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property and directing any necessary title changes or instructions to third parties. After the order is entered, we assist with implementing the court’s directions, such as recording deed corrections, transferring accounts, or coordinating with title companies so that the Trustee can manage and distribute the assets under the trust’s terms.
At a hearing, the Trustee or representative summarizes the evidence and explains why the asset should be treated as trust property. We prepare witness declarations, exhibit lists, and oral argument that address the court’s likely concerns. This preparation includes anticipating objections from heirs or creditors and having responsive evidence ready. Clear, well-organized presentation at the hearing increases the chances of a definitive ruling that allows trust administration to proceed without further uncertainty.
After receiving a favorable order, the Trustee must follow the court’s instructions to correct title, transfer accounts, or record any necessary documents. We assist in coordinating with title companies, financial institutions, and county recorders to ensure that deeds are recorded and accounts are retitled in the name of the trust or Trustee. Proper implementation closes the loop on administration, enabling distribution to beneficiaries under the trust terms and reducing future risks of claims or title disputes.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to the probate court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property even though they were not formally retitled before the settlor’s death. It is commonly used when the trust document and other evidence indicate the settlor intended specific property to be part of the trust, but the transfer was not completed. The petition sets out the facts and supporting records that demonstrate intent and asks the court to issue an order allowing the Trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. You should consider using a Heggstad petition when you are administering a trust and encounter assets still titled in the decedent’s name that appear intended for the trust. It is especially appropriate when timely resolving the title issue would avoid the need for full probate for those assets. The petition process requires careful documentation and proper notice to interested parties; early assessment and evidence collection increase the chance of a smooth resolution and can reduce delay and expense.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the court’s calendar, and whether the petition is contested. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and minimal objections, a petition may be resolved in a few months. This includes time for document gathering, drafting the petition, filing with the probate court, and allowing the statutory notice period for interested parties to respond. When disputes arise or additional evidence is required, the process can take longer, sometimes extending several months to a year. Preparing a comprehensive evidentiary record and addressing potential objections early can shorten proceedings. Our office helps set realistic expectations for timing and works to streamline filings and communications to reduce delays wherever possible.
Key evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust document itself, deeds or account statements showing the asset, draft assignments or transfer paperwork, and any correspondence or notes indicating the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Declarations from individuals who assisted with planning or witnessed the settlor’s intent can also be useful. Together, these materials establish a factual record that explains why the asset should be treated as trust property rather than probate property. Providing a clear timeline of events and well-organized exhibits makes the petition more persuasive to the court. Financial institutions and title companies may also have records showing attempted transfers or instructions. Gathering these documents early and preparing detailed affidavits improves the chance of obtaining an order that recognizes the trust interest without extensive litigation.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties may object to a Heggstad petition if they dispute that the asset was intended for the trust or believe the asset should pass through probate. Objections can be based on competing interpretations of the documents, suspicions about the settlor’s intent, or asserted irregularities in trust formation. When objections arise, the court evaluates the evidence and may hold a hearing to resolve contested issues. Anticipating potential objections and addressing them with clear documentation and witness declarations helps reduce the likelihood of prolonged disputes. Open communication with beneficiaries and transparent sharing of the factual basis for the petition often encourages resolution without a contested hearing, but when contesting issues remain, the court process provides a forum to resolve them under California law.
Filing a Heggstad petition can often avoid probate for the specific assets at issue if the court agrees they should be treated as trust property. This outcome permits those assets to be administered under the trust, preserving privacy and typically reducing administrative time and cost compared with probate. However, the petition applies to the assets specifically identified and supported by evidence; it does not necessarily prevent probate for other assets that were not intended for the trust or where evidence is lacking. If the petition is contested or the court finds insufficient evidence of intent, the asset may still be subject to probate. Therefore, collecting strong documentation and notifying interested parties appropriately is important to maximize the likelihood that affected assets will be administered under the trust rather than through probate.
Costs for a Heggstad petition depend on the complexity of the matter, the amount of documentary preparation required, and whether the petition is contested. Reasonably straightforward matters that proceed without significant opposition generally incur lower costs associated with document review, drafting, filing fees, and minimal court appearances. When additional evidence gathering or contested hearings are necessary, fees can increase due to the extra time and resources involved. Our office discusses estimated costs during the initial consultation and provides guidance on whether a petition is likely to be cost-effective compared with alternatives. We aim to be transparent about fees and to structure our work to focus on the most efficient path to obtain a favorable court order when appropriate.
If an asset is transferred after the settlor’s death, for instance by a family member or third party, the situation can become more complicated and may require additional legal action to recover or recognize title. The court will examine the nature of the transfer, any authority under the decedent’s documents, and whether the transfer was consistent with the settlor’s intent. In some cases, courts may undo improper transfers or order corrective measures to align title with the trust or estate outcome. Prevention is often the best approach: promptly identifying and documenting intended trust assets and filing a petition when necessary reduces the chance of unauthorized transfers. If a post-death transfer has already occurred, careful legal assessment and timely action are essential to protect beneficiaries’ interests and to pursue remedies available under California law.
Banks and title companies often accept court orders that recognize trust ownership when the order is clear and properly recorded. A Heggstad petition that results in a certified court order can be presented to financial institutions and county recorders to update account ownership or record deed corrections. Institutions typically follow court directives and their internal procedures for changing title once they have verified the order and any supporting documentation. Coordinating with banks and title companies is part of implementing a successful petition outcome. After obtaining a court order, our office assists clients with the steps required by institutions to retitle accounts or record deeds, ensuring compliance with their requirements and reducing the risk of further delays or administrative obstacles.
Correcting transfers for retirement or brokerage accounts often involves both probate procedures and the account provider’s internal rules. Some accounts allow beneficiary designation changes that override trust intentions, while others require court orders or the cooperation of the account custodian. A Heggstad petition can help in circumstances where the settlor intended the account to be owned by the trust but the custodian requires a court declaration or additional documentation to recognize the trust interest. Working with the account custodian early to understand their specific requirements helps streamline the process. In some cases, additional forms or affidavits are necessary; in others, a court order obtained through a petition is sufficient to prompt the institution to recognize the trust’s claim and transfer funds to the Trustee for administration or distribution according to the trust’s terms.
To begin the Heggstad petition process with the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, start by contacting our office at 408-528-2827 to arrange an initial consultation. We will discuss the facts, request preliminary documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, and account statements, and review whether a petition is likely to be effective given the available evidence. This initial step helps us identify the most efficient path forward and estimate timelines and likely costs. After the initial review, we assist with collecting necessary documentation, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, and filing in the appropriate probate court. We also handle notice and follow-up communications with interested parties and institutions, guiding Trustees through each stage until title is corrected and trust administration can proceed as intended.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas