A Heggstad Petition can be a practical tool for families when a deceased person’s estate includes a trust that did not receive all expected assets during the settlor’s lifetime. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in San Antonio Heights and throughout California understand how a Heggstad Petition works, what evidence is required, and how to pursue proper distribution of assets. This introduction explains the basics of the petition, the common scenarios where it applies, and the steps involved in bringing a petition to court to confirm that assets should be treated as part of the decedent’s trust.
When a trustmaker intended assets to be transferred to a trust but the transfer was not completed, beneficiaries and personal representatives may need legal clarity to access those assets. A Heggstad Petition asks a court to impose assets into the trust based on the settlor’s intention and supporting documentation. This paragraph highlights how careful record review, declarations, and court filings work together to demonstrate intent, and why early consultation can help preserve evidence and avoid delays. Our firm brings practical strategies for assembling documentation, preparing declarations, and presenting a clear case to the court.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can restore a decedent’s intended estate plan by confirming that assets belong in a trust despite formal transfer defects. This process allows beneficiaries to receive trust property without prolonged litigation over ownership. A successful petition clarifies asset ownership, reduces the risk of competing claims, and enables trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust terms. For families seeking stability during an emotionally challenging time, the petition can streamline administration and help preserve the settlor’s wishes by relying on documents, testimony, and applicable California trust law to support the transfer.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and administration services for individuals and families in California, including Heggstad Petitions and related trust matters. Our team assists clients with trust funding issues, trust modification petitions, and probate alternatives. We focus on careful document review, organized case preparation, and thoughtful client communication to guide families through complex trust disputes. With experience handling a wide range of estate planning instruments, we help clients evaluate options, gather evidence, and pursue the path that best preserves the settlor’s intent while minimizing delay and expense.
A Heggstad Petition is a court request to treat certain assets as if they had been transferred into a trust during the trustmaker’s lifetime. This remedy typically applies when paperwork or transfers were incomplete but the settlor clearly intended the trust to receive the assets. The petition often relies on declarations, bank records, correspondence, and the trust document itself to establish intent. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence to decide whether to impose assets into the trust. Understanding this legal mechanism helps beneficiaries and personal representatives decide whether pursuing a petition is appropriate for their situation.
Pursuing a Heggstad Petition requires careful timing and attention to procedural requirements under California law. Gathering contemporaneous evidence, drafting persuasive declarations, and preparing accurate legal forms are essential to present a coherent case. While some matters resolve through informal negotiation with financial institutions or family members, others require formal court intervention to secure clear title. This paragraph explains that each case is unique: outcomes depend on the quality of the evidence, the clarity of the settlor’s intent, and the applicable trust provisions, so thoughtful preparation is key to success.
A Heggstad Petition asks a probate or superior court to impose specific assets into a trust because the trustmaker intended those assets to belong to the trust. The petition is named for a California case that established this remedy and is used when formalities of transfer are incomplete or when assets were mistakenly left out of funding. The court evaluates declarations, account statements, transfer documentation, and other evidence to infer intent. If the court is persuaded, it issues an order treating the assets as trust property, allowing trustees to manage them under the trust’s terms and beneficiaries to receive distributions in line with the settlor’s wishes.
Successful petitions hinge on demonstrating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust and presenting sufficient evidence to support that intent. Typical elements include the trust instrument, declarations from those with knowledge of the settlor’s intent, bank or account records showing attempted transfers, and any correspondence indicating the settlor’s plan. The process usually involves filing a petition, serving interested parties, and providing supporting affidavits and exhibits. In some cases informal resolution can be achieved by working with institutions to re-title accounts, but when disputes arise the court process establishes clear legal ownership.
This glossary provides plain-language definitions of terms commonly used in Heggstad Petitions and trust administration. Understanding these terms can help beneficiaries, trustees, and personal representatives follow the petition process and participate effectively in proceedings. Definitions cover items such as funding, trust instruments, declarations, and the types of evidence courts rely upon. Clear definitions also help families collect supporting documents and communicate with financial institutions. Keeping accurate records and knowing the applicable terminology improves the odds of resolving transfer issues efficiently and in a way that aligns with the settlor’s intentions.
Funding the trust refers to the process of transferring ownership or title of assets from an individual into the trust so the trust holds legal title. Funding can involve changing account designations, retitling real property, assigning personal property, or updating beneficiary designations on certain accounts. When funding is incomplete, assets may remain in the individual’s name, creating ambiguity at death. A Heggstad Petition seeks to correct that ambiguity by showing the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust and asking the court to treat them as such for trust administration and distribution purposes.
Declaration evidence consists of written statements from individuals with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intentions or actions. Declarations may come from the trustee, family members, financial advisors, or others who observed the settlor’s planning steps. Declarations often describe conversations, instructions given to financial institutions, or steps taken to move assets into the trust. Courts review these declarations alongside documentary evidence to assess whether the trustmaker intended the trust to receive the disputed assets and whether equitable relief such as a Heggstad Petition is warranted.
Imposition into trust is the court’s legal recognition that certain property should be treated as trust property despite a lack of formal transfer. When a court imposes assets into a trust it effectively confirms that the trustee has authority to manage and distribute those assets under the trust’s terms. This remedy is typically pursued through a Heggstad Petition when evidence supports that the trustmaker intended the trust to own the property but formalities were not completed. Once imposed, the assets are administered together with other trust property.
Trust administration refers to the process by which a trustee collects, manages, safeguards, and distributes trust assets according to the trust’s terms and applicable law. When a Heggstad Petition succeeds in adding assets to a trust, those assets become part of the administration process and are subject to the trustee’s fiduciary duties, accounting responsibilities, and distribution rules. Proper administration includes identifying assets, notifying beneficiaries, preparing inventories or accountings if required, and making distributions while adhering to the trust document and legal requirements.
When assets are left out of a trust, families can pursue different paths depending on the circumstances. Informal resolution with financial institutions may succeed when records clearly show intent and institutions are cooperative. A Heggstad Petition provides a court-based solution when informal measures fail or when competing claims exist. Probate offers another route but can be lengthier and more public than trust-based relief. This comparison helps clients weigh speed, cost, privacy, and certainty. Choosing the appropriate path depends on evidence, the parties involved, and the settlor’s expressed wishes, so careful evaluation is recommended.
In some cases, a limited approach is effective when clear documentation already exists showing the settlor intended the trust to receive particular assets. Bank statements, account change requests, trust drafts, or written instructions can often clarify intent sufficiently for institutions to retitle accounts without court involvement. When this documentary trail is robust and uncontested, contacting the relevant institution with supporting records and a legal declaration can resolve the issue quickly and without litigation. This approach preserves privacy and reduces cost while achieving the desired outcome for beneficiaries and trustees.
A limited resolution is often appropriate when parties are cooperative and there are no competing claims to the property. If heirs, trustees, and financial institutions agree about the settlor’s intent and documentation supports that intent, informal re-titling or administrative correction may proceed smoothly. Cooperation allows for faster resolution and avoids the expense and delay of court proceedings. In such scenarios, focusing on clear communication, providing complete records, and obtaining necessary sign-offs can reassemble the settlor’s intended estate plan without the need for formal petitions.
Comprehensive legal services become necessary when documentation is incomplete, institutions decline to retitle assets, or disputes arise among potential claimants. In these situations a Heggstad Petition can provide the authoritative legal determination needed to impose assets into the trust. Preparing a petition involves gathering evidence, drafting declarations, ensuring proper service, and presenting the case in court if necessary. Full representation helps clients navigate procedural requirements, anticipate defenses, and assemble a coherent evidentiary record to support the trustmaker’s intent.
Comprehensive services also protect beneficiaries’ rights and reduce the risk of future challenges to asset distributions. When title and ownership questions remain unresolved, beneficiaries may face delays, litigation, or competing claims that erode estate value. Formal court action clarifies ownership and places disputed assets firmly within the trust for administration. This legal clarity makes it less likely that successors will later contest distributions or ownership, and provides a durable resolution that trustees can rely on when performing their duties and making distributions according to the trust terms.
Pursuing a comprehensive legal path provides certainty and enforceable orders that address title problems and protect the trust’s integrity. A court order imposing assets into the trust removes ambiguity and allows the trustee to manage and distribute those assets without ongoing dispute. For families with complex asset structures, competing heirs, or resistant institutions, formal proceedings create a final resolution that institutional custodians will accept. This reduces the likelihood of repeated disputes and helps preserve the estate for the intended beneficiaries under the trust’s terms.
A thorough approach also ensures compliance with procedural requirements and preserves legal arguments that may be important if the matter goes to hearing. Proper preparation includes organizing records, obtaining witness declarations, and anticipating potential defenses. Legal representation helps craft persuasive petitions and responses, manage timelines, and communicate with courts and opposing parties. While comprehensive measures may involve additional time and cost, they provide the enforceable clarity necessary to finalize administration and reduce the chance of future litigation over the same assets.
One primary benefit of comprehensive court action is securing a final judicial determination about whether specific assets belong to the trust. Such a determination resolves disputes and establishes clear authority for the trustee to act. With this clarity, institutions honor orders and titles are corrected or accepted, enabling trustees to administer assets and distribute proceeds as the trust directs. The judicial resolution reduces uncertainty and supports the orderly transfer of assets, helping to implement the trustmaker’s plan without prolonged conflict.
A comprehensive approach increases protection against subsequent challenges by producing court findings that confirm intent and ownership. Those rulings create a formal record that future claimants must overcome, which is often difficult absent new evidence. This protective effect helps preserve the trust’s distributions and minimizes ongoing contestation. By documenting facts, witness testimony, and legal conclusions, the process builds a durable foundation for trust administration and gives trustees and beneficiaries confidence that the settlor’s wishes will be carried out.
Collecting and preserving records is a foundational step when preparing a Heggstad Petition. Relevant items include bank statements, account change requests, copies of trust documents, communications with financial institutions, and any contemporaneous notes or instructions from the trustmaker. Preserving original documents and creating organized copies reduces delays and strengthens the factual record. Early preservation avoids loss of key evidence and helps clarify the settlor’s intent. When records are incomplete, documenting who has knowledge of the settlor’s intentions and obtaining written declarations will support the petition process and improve the likelihood of a favorable result in court.
Witness statements and sworn declarations from people who interacted with the trustmaker can be vital to proving intent. Statements should describe relevant conversations, instructions, and steps taken to fund the trust. Declarations must be accurate, signed under penalty of perjury, and include details that corroborate documentary evidence. Gathering these statements promptly reduces the risk that memory fades or witnesses become unavailable. Thoughtful, factual declarations that align with documentary records strengthen the petition and provide a coherent narrative for the court when evaluating whether to impose assets into the trust.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when assets that should be part of a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name or otherwise outside the trust at death. These situations create administrative complications and can delay distributions to beneficiaries. A petition seeks a court determination that the settlor intended those assets to be trust property, enabling trustees to manage and distribute them under the trust. This process helps protect beneficiaries’ interests and reduce the potential for disputes, providing a clear legal pathway to complete administration consistent with the trustmaker’s plan.
You should also consider a petition when financial institutions refuse to recognize transfer attempts or when heirs disagree about ownership. If informal documents are available but incomplete, or if there is risk of competing claims, a Heggstad Petition clarifies title and authority. The petition process can correct administrative oversights and provide legal certainty needed to transfer assets, update records, and finalize distributions. For families aiming to honor the trustmaker’s wishes while resolving ownership questions definitively, this legal avenue often provides the most secure outcome.
Common circumstances include partially funded trusts where real property, bank accounts, or brokerage accounts were not retitled; transfers attempted but not completed before death; assets acquired in the settlor’s name after the trust was executed; and institutional refusals to accept documentation without a court order. Additionally, family disputes over whether assets were intended for the trust often require judicial resolution. Identifying the right approach early, preserving records, and evaluating whether informal remedies may suffice are important first steps in addressing these common scenarios effectively.
Incomplete trust funding occurs when assets remain titled in the trustmaker’s name rather than the trust, often due to oversight or interrupted transfers. This leaves the asset outside the trust’s administration at death, creating ambiguity about rightful ownership. A Heggstad Petition seeks to correct that oversight by presenting evidence that the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust. Addressing incomplete funding promptly during administration helps prevent delays and ensures distributions align with the trust’s provisions once the court confirms ownership.
Sometimes the settlor attempted to change account ownership or beneficiary designations but an institutional error or missing paperwork prevented the change from taking effect. When records show an attempted transfer or instruction to the institution, a Heggstad Petition can present that evidence to the court to establish the settlor’s intent. This remedy helps convert failed administrative attempts into a legal pathway for including those assets within the trust, enabling trustees to access and distribute the property as intended by the trustmaker.
Assets acquired by the trustmaker after executing the trust may not be automatically incorporated into the trust unless retitled or designated appropriately, which can leave them outside the trust at death. If the settlor intended these post-execution assets to be part of the trust, a Heggstad Petition can demonstrate that intent with supporting evidence. The petition provides a mechanism to align asset ownership with the trustmaker’s overall estate plan, ensuring later-acquired property is treated consistently with earlier trust planning.
We assist San Antonio Heights residents with Heggstad Petitions and related trust administration matters, offering guidance on gathering evidence, preparing petitions, and pursuing court orders when needed. Our approach focuses on clear communication, timely action, and practical steps to protect beneficiaries’ interests. We help clients evaluate whether an informal resolution is possible and, when necessary, prepare the documentation and filings required for court. Residents can rely on our team for steady guidance through the process of restoring assets to a trust and completing estate administration.
Choosing legal representation for a Heggstad Petition means selecting a team that will thoroughly review the trust documents and supporting records, assemble declarations, and prepare persuasive filings tailored to each case. We prioritize gathering relevant evidence, communicating with institutions, and identifying resolve-oriented options where possible. Our approach aims to reduce unnecessary delay by focusing on the most effective path to restore assets to the trust and protect beneficiary rights, while keeping clients informed at every stage of the process.
When informal efforts fail, a carefully drafted petition supported by well-organized documentation can make a crucial difference in court. We assist clients in obtaining witness declarations, compiling correspondence, and presenting a clear factual narrative tied to legal standards that govern imposition of assets into trusts. This thorough preparation improves the odds of a favorable judicial outcome and helps trustees proceed with administration once an order is obtained. Our goal is to achieve timely and durable resolutions that align with the settlor’s intentions.
We also offer considered guidance on alternative strategies, such as negotiating with institutions or pursuing other probate remedies if appropriate. Our client-centered approach emphasizes transparency about timing, likely costs, and realistic pathways toward resolution. For families seeking practical assistance in restoring trust assets, we provide steady support through the evidence-gathering, filing, and court processes, working to secure the legal authority needed for trustees to manage and distribute property according to the trustmaker’s plan.
Our legal process begins with a careful review of trust documents, account records, and any correspondence or notes that reflect the trustmaker’s intent. We then identify missing elements, outline evidence needed for a petition, and pursue informal remedies if feasible. When court filing is necessary, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, ensure proper service on interested parties, and represent clients through hearings if required. Throughout the process we maintain clear communication, organize documents to present a compelling factual record, and pursue the solution most aligned with the settlor’s estate plan.
The initial step focuses on locating and evaluating all documents and records relevant to funding the trust. This includes the trust instrument, account statements, transfer forms, emails, and any notes or instructions from the trustmaker. We interview those with knowledge of the settlor’s intent and request declarations where needed. Identifying gaps early helps determine whether informal correction is feasible or whether a petition is necessary. A comprehensive review forms the foundation of the petition and shapes the strategy for presenting the case.
Organizing documents into a coherent evidentiary file is critical. We catalog trust documents, account statements, and correspondence that support funding intent. This organization helps reveal what is missing and what additional proof may be necessary. A clear file makes it easier to draft effective declarations and compile exhibits for court. Good organization also facilitates negotiations with institutions and simplifies the presentation of facts to judges and opposing parties, increasing the likelihood of resolving funding questions efficiently.
We conduct witness interviews to gather firsthand accounts of the trustmaker’s instructions and actions. Those with direct knowledge provide declarations that describe conversations, transfer attempts, and steps taken to fund the trust. Well-crafted declarations that corroborate documentary evidence are persuasive in court. Interviewing witnesses early preserves memories and allows us to tailor declarations to address potential disputes. These statements become a core component of the petition and support the factual narrative needed to establish intent to impose assets into the trust.
After assembling evidence, we pursue administrative remedies with financial institutions when appropriate, presenting documentation to request retitling or account changes. If institutions decline or disputes remain, we prepare a Heggstad Petition with supporting declarations and exhibits. The petition is drafted to conform with California procedural rules and tailored to the facts of the case. This step balances efficient administrative efforts with the preparation needed for court intervention, ensuring that all available alternatives are explored before filing.
We reach out to banks, brokerages, and other custodians to present the assembled evidence and seek voluntary correction. Negotiation can avoid litigation when records clearly reflect intent and no competing claims exist. We document all communications and responses to demonstrate efforts to resolve issues administratively. If a cooperative resolution is achieved, the trust is funded without court involvement. When institutions refuse, those documented refusals become part of the petition record and support the case for judicial relief.
Preparing a robust petition requires clear narrative, well-organized exhibits, and declarations that align with documentation. We draft pleadings that lay out the factual background, legal basis for imposition, and requested relief. Exhibits include account statements, transfer requests, trust excerpts, and signed declarations. Careful attention to detail and adherence to court rules reduce procedural risks and strengthen the petition. This preparation positions the case for the most favorable resolution, whether by stipulation or through court hearing.
Once the petition is filed and properly served on interested parties, the court may schedule a hearing or consider the matter on submitted papers. We handle service, respond to any objections or competing claims, and present the factual and legal basis for relief. If a hearing is necessary, we present argument and evidence to support imposition of the assets into the trust. After a favorable order, we assist with the practical steps to retitle accounts or otherwise effectuate the court’s directive so trustees can proceed with administration.
When objections or competing claims arise, we evaluate their basis and prepare responses supported by facts and law. This may include supplemental declarations, additional documentary evidence, or negotiation to narrow disputes. Addressing challenges promptly preserves the momentum of the case and prevents unnecessary delay. By focusing on the strongest supporting evidence and legal arguments, we aim to limit contested issues and seek resolution through court rulings or agreements that place assets within the trust for administration.
After the court issues an order imposing assets into the trust, we assist with implementing the order, which can include presenting the court order to institutions, updating account titles, and coordinating distributions. Ensuring that institutions accept and act on the order is an important final step in completing administration. We guide trustees through the required administrative actions, help prepare any necessary accountings, and work to finalize distributions in accordance with the trust terms so beneficiaries receive the property intended by the trustmaker.
A Heggstad Petition is a legal request to a court to treat certain assets as trust property when formal transfer into the trust was not completed during the trustmaker’s lifetime. It is based on evidence that the trustmaker intended the assets to belong to the trust, even though title or other formalities were not finalized. Courts examine the trust instrument, communications, account records, and witness declarations to determine whether to impose the assets into the trust for administration and distribution according to the trust terms. This remedy is commonly used when documentary evidence indicates intent but institutions will not retitle assets without a court order. The petition provides a clear legal mechanism to resolve ownership questions, protect beneficiaries, and enable the trustee to manage and distribute assets under the trust. It is a pathway to enforce the trustmaker’s intentions and to complete trust administration where administrative corrections are insufficient.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition varies depending on case complexity, the quality of the evidence, and whether objections arise. Simple matters with clear documentation and cooperative institutions may be resolved through administrative efforts in a few weeks to months. When a petition is filed, routine court processing and scheduling can add additional weeks or months. If hearings are required or if there are contested issues, the process can take longer depending on court calendars and the scope of disputes. Early, thorough preparation of declarations and exhibits helps minimize delays by making the factual record clear. Promptly documenting communications with institutions and preserving evidence reduces the need for extensive discovery. While timelines vary, proactive document collection and engaging responsive representation usually improve the likelihood of a more efficient resolution and reduce the risk of prolonged litigation.
Evidence supporting a Heggstad Petition typically includes the trust document, account statements, transfer forms, correspondence showing the settlor’s plan, and any notes or memos indicating intent to fund the trust. Declarations from individuals who witnessed the settlor’s instructions or who assisted with attempted transfers are also important. Together these materials create a narrative that the trustmaker intended the assets to be part of the trust even though formal transfer steps were incomplete. The strength of the petition rests on the consistency and credibility of the evidence. Courts weigh documentary proof and sworn witness statements to infer intent. When records are fragmented, complementary declarations that align with contemporaneous documents can bridge gaps. A thoughtfully assembled evidentiary file increases the likelihood that a court will impose the assets into the trust for administration and distribution.
Yes, in some matters a Heggstad-type issue can be resolved without court action if financial institutions agree to retitle accounts or accept documentation showing the trustmaker’s intent. When records and declarations clearly demonstrate the settlor intended the trust to receive the assets and no competing claims exist, institutions may correct titles administratively. Effective communication and presenting organized documentation can often lead to a voluntary correction, saving time and expense. However, when institutions decline to act, or when heirs dispute ownership, court intervention through a petition becomes necessary to secure a binding determination. Documented refusals and documented attempts to resolve the matter inform the need for filing. Considering informal remedies first is common, but readiness to escalate to a petition helps ensure that missing transfers are ultimately treated consistently with the trustmaker’s wishes.
When filing a Heggstad Petition in California, notice must be given to interested parties who may include potential beneficiaries, trustees, personal representatives, and any person with a known interest in the assets. The court’s local rules and probate procedures dictate proper service methods and timelines. Providing notice ensures that interested parties have the opportunity to object or participate in the proceedings and is fundamental to obtaining enforceable relief. Ensuring correct and timely service requires careful identification of all interested parties and adherence to procedural rules. Failure to serve necessary parties properly can delay the case or lead to procedural complications. Early attention to identifying and notifying interested persons helps keep the petition moving forward and reduces the risk of later challenges based on inadequate notice.
If someone objects to a Heggstad Petition, the court will consider the objection and may require additional evidence, briefing, or a hearing to resolve disputed factual or legal issues. Objectors may challenge the sufficiency of the evidence of intent, raise competing ownership claims, or assert procedural defects. Responding to objections typically involves submitting supplemental declarations, documentary proof, and legal argument showing why the petition should be granted despite the objection. Managing objections effectively requires assessing their substance and addressing weaknesses in the record. Where possible, negotiation or targeted discovery can narrow issues before a hearing. Courts ultimately weigh competing evidence and make findings regarding intent and ownership. Preparing a thorough record and clear responses increases the likelihood of a favorable resolution even when objections are raised.
A court order imposing assets into the trust generally provides the legal authority trustees need to access and administer those assets, but practical steps may still be required for institutions to accept the order. Banks and custodians often require a certified copy of the order and may have internal processes to apply the court ruling to retitle accounts or transfer funds. Trustees should be prepared to present the order along with trust documents and identification to effectuate the institution’s compliance. In some cases additional administrative paperwork or follow-up with the institution is necessary to complete the transfer. Working closely with counsel to present the required documentation and to coordinate with institutions expedites the post-order implementation. Once institutions accept the court order and update titles, trustees can manage and distribute the assets under the trust terms.
Costs for filing a Heggstad Petition vary based on the complexity of the matter, required court filings, and whether the case is contested. Filing fees, service costs, and costs for obtaining records are part of the baseline expenses. If hearings are necessary or if substantial evidence gathering and declarations are required, professional fees will increase. Estimating cost early in the matter provides clients with realistic expectations and allows for planning around likely expenses. Pursuing administrative resolutions with institutions first can reduce total costs when successful. When court action becomes necessary, careful preparation and focused litigation strategies help control fees by addressing the core issues efficiently. Discussing likely costs and potential alternatives at the outset helps families choose the approach that best aligns with their objectives and budget.
Yes, a Heggstad Petition can be used to impose various types of assets into a trust, including real property, bank and brokerage accounts, and personal property, provided the evidence supports the settlor’s intent. For real property, the court will look at deeds, communications about retitling, and actions taken by the settlor to show intent to transfer ownership to the trust. The process for real property may require additional documentation such as deeds and title records to support the petition. Each asset type has procedural and practical nuances, and an evidentiary approach tailored to the asset is important. For example, retitling real estate usually requires recording a deed once the court has issued an order, while financial institutions typically update account registrations upon presentation of the court order. Preparing the appropriate documentary record for each asset type increases the chance of successful imposition into the trust.
If a loved one intended assets to be in a trust but they were not retitled, start by collecting all relevant documentation: the trust document, account statements, correspondence showing transfer attempts, notes, and any paperwork showing the settlor’s plan. Speak with financial institutions to determine what records exist and whether administrative correction is possible. Document all communications carefully, including names and dates, to create a clear timeline of events that supports the settlor’s intent. If informal efforts do not resolve the issue, consider preparing a Heggstad Petition with supporting declarations and exhibits to request a court order imposing the assets into the trust. Early consultation to evaluate the strength of the evidence and to plan next steps helps preserve options. Prompt action to gather proof and secure declarations from witnesses improves the prospects of obtaining court-ordered relief and completing trust administration according to the trustmaker’s wishes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas