A trust modification petition can change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances or goals evolve. Whether you are addressing changes in family dynamics, adapting to new tax considerations, or correcting drafting errors, a trust modification petition is a legal path to update a trust without creating a new document. This process often involves filing a petition with the court, providing notice to interested parties, and demonstrating the legal basis for the requested modification. Our San Bernardino practice focuses on clear, practical advice that helps clients understand options and next steps for preserving their intentions and protecting beneficiaries.
Many people assume trusts are static after signing, but changes in life, law, or assets can make modification necessary. A trust modification petition may be the right approach when all parties agree to an amendment, when a court must resolve ambiguity, or when unforeseen events make the original trust provisions impractical. The petition process aims to balance the settlor’s intent with current realities while minimizing conflict and delay. We work to explain how courts evaluate petitions, what evidence is helpful, and how to communicate with beneficiaries to reduce misunderstanding and preserve family relationships during the process.
A properly handled trust modification can protect assets and honor the settlor’s updated wishes without disruption. It may address changes such as new beneficiaries, different asset management needs, or updated distribution schedules. When done effectively, modification reduces future disputes by clarifying intent and aligning legal documents with present circumstances. A court-approved modification adds enforceability and often brings greater certainty than informal adjustments. For families in San Bernardino, the right petition can improve estate administration and help avoid probate complications while maintaining continuity of trust management and beneficiary protections for the long term.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning services to clients in San Bernardino and throughout California, including trust modification petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and strategies to minimize contested proceedings. We prioritize practical solutions that advance clients’ goals while observing California procedural and fiduciary requirements. When filing a petition, we prepare documentation, coordinate necessary notices, and advocate for resolutions that preserve family relationships and protect assets. Call our San Jose office at 408-528-2827 to discuss how a modification petition may apply to your trust situation.
A trust modification petition seeks court approval to change the terms of an existing trust when parties cannot otherwise effect the change or when a court declaration is needed. California law permits modifications for reasons ranging from scrivener errors to changes in circumstances that make original provisions impractical. The process typically starts with a petition that explains the requested amendment and the legal grounds supporting it. The court reviews evidence of intent, any agreements among beneficiaries or trustees, and whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s probable intent and statutory standards before granting relief.
Petitions can vary widely in complexity depending on the trust’s provisions, the number of interested parties, and the nature of the requested change. Some modifications are straightforward when beneficiaries and trustees agree, while contested petitions may require hearings and detailed factual records. Courts consider notice requirements and the potential impact on beneficiaries’ rights before acting. Preparing a thorough petition, including supporting declarations and documentary evidence, improves the likelihood of a smooth resolution and reduces the risk of appeals or further litigation that could deplete trust assets over time.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate court to alter the terms of an existing trust. Common reasons for filing include correcting typographical or drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language, adjusting distributions due to changed financial circumstances, or addressing events that the trust did not anticipate. The petition sets forth the factual basis for the requested change and the legal authority for the court to approve it. Courts weigh the settlor’s intent, the rights of beneficiaries, and statutory frameworks when deciding whether to grant a modification.
Successful petitions present clear statements of the trust’s history, the specific amendment requested, and legal arguments supporting the change. Essential elements include a proposed order, declarations from interested parties or witnesses, and evidence demonstrating why modification is appropriate. The process typically involves filing the petition, serving notice to beneficiaries and potentially interested creditors, and attending hearings as scheduled by the court. Properly documenting all communications and maintaining transparency with beneficiaries reduces the chance of surprise objections and helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate trust modification proceedings. Definitions clarify roles such as settlor, trustee, and beneficiary, as well as procedural concepts like notice, objection, and nunc pro tunc relief. A clear grasp of these terms makes consultations and filings more productive. Below are concise definitions crafted to help San Bernardino clients communicate with the court and other parties, so they can make decisions with confidence about whether a petition is the right path for their trust issues.
The settlor is the person who originally created the trust and set its terms. The settlor’s expressed intentions in the trust document are central to a modification petition because courts generally seek to honor those intentions. When a settlor is alive, courts may consider the settlor’s consent to modifications, depending on capacity and presence of legal authority. If the settlor has passed away, the court evaluates other evidence of the settlor’s intent and whether the proposed change aligns with the trust’s original purpose and the settlor’s likely wishes.
Nunc pro tunc relief refers to a court’s ability to issue an order that has retroactive effect to correct or clarify past actions or filings. In the trust modification context, nunc pro tunc orders can be used to fix administrative errors or to recognize changes as having taken effect at an earlier date. Courts use this mechanism cautiously, ensuring that retroactive adjustments do not unfairly prejudice beneficiaries or disrupt settled expectations. Clear documentation supporting the need for retroactive relief strengthens such requests in court.
The trustee is the person or entity responsible for administering the trust according to its terms and applicable law. Trustees have fiduciary responsibilities to manage trust assets prudently and to act in the best interests of beneficiaries. When a modification petition is filed, trustees often play a central role by providing information, implementing court orders, and sometimes consenting to proposed changes. Trustees must follow notice and reporting requirements and may need to seek court instructions when faced with ambiguous terms or conflicts among beneficiaries.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have rights to notice and the opportunity to object to proposed modifications that affect their interests. Courts evaluate how a proposed modification would impact beneficiaries and whether the change respects the settlor’s intent. Open communication with beneficiaries and a transparent petition process can reduce disputes and foster agreements that achieve better outcomes for all parties involved in the trust’s administration.
There are several approaches to altering trust terms, including informal amendments when all parties agree, restatements that consolidate changes into a new comprehensive document, and court petitions for formal modifications. Informal adjustments may be appropriate for minor, uncontested changes and can be efficient when permitted by the trust. Restatements are useful when many changes are needed and a clean, updated document is desired. Court petitions become necessary when parties disagree, when the trust lacks amendment provisions, or when legal authority must be established to implement changes without future challenge.
A limited amendment often suffices for clarifying ambiguous language, correcting a typographical error, or adjusting a distribution due to a straightforward change in family circumstances. When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree on the desired correction, a narrow amendment can be documented quickly and implemented with minimal disruption. This approach is also appropriate when the trust’s other provisions remain valid and consistent with the settlor’s original plan. Careful drafting ensures the change addresses the specific issue without unintentionally altering other trust objectives.
Choosing a limited amendment can prevent the expense and delay associated with more formal proceedings when the parties are in agreement. If the modification is narrowly tailored and does not affect the overall structure of the trust, stakeholders often find this path preserves relationships and reduces legal costs. Counsel can prepare concise amendment documents and facilitate beneficiary consent, helping ensure that the change is timely, enforceable, and aligned with the settlor’s wishes while avoiding the need for court intervention in straightforward matters.
Comprehensive legal assistance becomes necessary when proposed modifications are substantial, when beneficiaries disagree, or when the trust document lacks clear amendment authority. In such cases, a formal petition to the probate court may be the most reliable way to obtain binding relief. Detailed analysis of trust provisions, collection of evidence such as communications or prior drafts, and careful presentation of legal arguments are essentials for achieving an outcome that adjusts the trust while respecting statutory standards and beneficiaries’ rights.
A comprehensive approach helps minimize the risk that future challenges will unsettle trust administration or deplete trust assets. When a petition is litigated, the record becomes formal, and court rulings provide clearer authority for trustees to act. Properly prepared petitions and settlement negotiations can produce durable resolutions that address competing interests and limit grounds for appeal. This approach is particularly valuable when significant property interests, retirement assets, or closely held family interests are involved and when lasting certainty is a primary objective.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification offers legal clarity and enforceability. When a court approves a petition, trustees receive explicit direction, reducing hesitation about difficult decisions. This clarity can prevent missteps that result from ambiguous language or conflicting beneficiary expectations. For families seeking stability and predictability, court-sanctioned modifications can streamline administration and protect assets from uncertainty, particularly when complex asset types or tax-sensitive issues are part of the estate plan.
Beyond clarity, comprehensive proceedings allow for a complete record of the settlor’s intent and the reasons for change, which reduces future litigation risk. Courts can provide equitable remedies and establish binding orders that trustees can rely on with confidence. Resolving disputes through the court process can also create structured outcomes that preserve important family relationships by setting clear, enforceable expectations for distributions and management of trust assets going forward.
When a court reviews and approves a modification, trustees gain safe harbor for acting on the updated terms without fear of later challenge. Beneficiaries likewise benefit from clear directives about their rights and anticipated distributions. This certainty supports sound asset management and reduces administrative friction. Clear judicial orders protect all parties by resolving ambiguities and documenting the legal basis for changes, which can otherwise linger as sources of future contention.
Comprehensive proceedings provide a forum for resolving disputes and bringing competing interests into alignment through negotiation or court decision. By formalizing agreements and creating an enforceable record, parties can move forward with reduced risk of subsequent claims or confusion. This process can preserve trust assets and family harmony by addressing sensitive issues transparently, establishing timelines for distributions, and clarifying trustee powers in a way that reflects updated priorities and legal considerations.
Collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent is essential. Having clear documentation helps support a petition and reduces the need for additional discovery or hearings. Early organization of financial statements, titles to property, and records of trustee actions streamlines fact development. When all relevant materials are available, counsel can craft a focused petition that highlights the legal and factual basis for the requested modification, improving efficiency in court proceedings and communication with beneficiaries.
A persuasive petition is grounded in solid facts and well-organized documentation, including declarations that explain the circumstances prompting change. Presenting a proposed order and supporting evidence that addresses likely objections helps the court evaluate the request efficiently. Where possible, identify legal authorities and analogous cases that support the relief sought. Thoughtful preparation reduces the chance of delays, narrow focus on disputed issues, and creates a record that supports long-term enforceability of the court’s decision.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect the settlor’s intentions or when circumstances make original provisions unworkable. Situations that commonly prompt petitions include changes in beneficiary needs, discovery of drafting errors, tax-law changes that impact distribution strategies, or trustee incapacity. When parties cannot implement changes informally or when clarity from the court is needed to move forward, a petition provides a structured path to update the trust while protecting fiduciary duties and beneficiaries’ rights.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to address disputes in a formal setting where a judge can provide definitive guidance. This can be beneficial when trustees face competing demands or when competing beneficiary interpretations threaten administration. Petition-driven resolutions create enforceable orders that trustees can rely upon, which reduces future uncertainty. For families balancing financial, tax, and caregiving considerations, the petition process can provide a stable foundation for the trust’s ongoing administration and help align outcomes with the settlor’s overarching objectives.
Common circumstances include ambiguity in trust language, beneficiary disputes over interpretation, discovery of typographical or drafting mistakes, changes in beneficiary circumstances such as disability or financial hardship, and shifts in tax rules that alter the anticipated consequences of trust provisions. Additionally, when trustees need court guidance to act in uncertain situations, or when settlors become incapacitated and changes are necessary to reflect new caregiving arrangements, a petition can provide the necessary legal authority to make appropriate adjustments.
Ambiguous wording in a trust can create serious administration challenges because trustees and beneficiaries may have conflicting interpretations. When ambiguity cannot be resolved through ordinary means, a petition can ask the court to interpret the language consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. The court considers the trust document as a whole, extrinsic evidence of intent where permitted, and relevant circumstances at the time of drafting. A judicial interpretation clarifies obligations and ensures consistent administration going forward.
Changes such as divorce, remarriage, a beneficiary’s financial difficulties, or a beneficiary’s disability may make previously drafted provisions unworkable or unfair. A petition can adjust distributions, change trustee powers, or create provisions that better meet current needs while preserving the settlor’s broader goals. The court evaluates whether the requested changes are reasonable and consistent with the trust’s purpose, helping families adapt estate plans to new realities without starting from scratch.
Typographical errors, missing provisions, or administrative mistakes can undermine a trust’s effectiveness. A petition may correct these issues by clarifying intent or granting orders that implement the settlor’s likely wishes. Courts can also address improper trustee actions or omissions and provide instructions to guide future administration. Bringing these problems before the court prevents ongoing misapplication of trust terms and limits the potential for extended disputes among beneficiaries.
We assist San Bernardino residents seeking to modify trust terms through careful legal guidance and solid procedural work. Whether you are initiating a petition to correct an error or responding to a request from another party, our practice helps gather documentation, prepare petitions, and manage the notice and hearing process. We aim to provide practical solutions that address family dynamics and protect trust assets while focusing on clear communication among trustees and beneficiaries. Contact us to discuss your situation and learn what steps are most appropriate for your trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers focused estate planning services tailored to trust modification matters in San Bernardino and across California. We emphasize careful analysis of trust language, strategic preparation of petitions, and respectful communication with trustees and beneficiaries. Our goal is to achieve durable resolutions that align with the settlor’s goals while minimizing disruption to family relationships. Clients appreciate practical guidance and straightforward counsel during what can be a sensitive and complex process.
When preparing a petition, we prioritize a comprehensive record that supports requested changes and addresses potential objections. We handle filings, coordinate required notices, and represent clients at hearings if needed. By focusing on preparation and clarity, we help trustees act with confidence and beneficiaries understand the implications of proposed modifications. Our approach seeks to reduce litigation risk and protect trust assets through effective advocacy and careful attention to statutory requirements and procedural detail.
We also emphasize early communication and documentation to facilitate settlements when appropriate. Many trust matters resolve more efficiently when parties share information and consider mediated resolutions. When litigation is necessary, we present well-supported petitions and build a factual record that the court can rely upon. For San Bernardino residents, our local perspective helps us navigate county procedures and deadlines while keeping your priorities at the forefront of each decision.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to understand the trust, stakeholder positions, and the desired outcome. We review all trust documents and related records, identify legal grounds for modification, and recommend the most effective path—whether amendment, restatement, or court petition. If a petition is appropriate, we prepare detailed pleadings, coordinate service and notice, and assemble supporting declarations and exhibits. Throughout the process, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed and aim to resolve matters efficiently while protecting trust assets and legal rights.
The first step involves collecting and reviewing the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents, and records of trustee actions. We use this information to evaluate legal options and to determine whether an informal amendment or a court petition is necessary. Clear identification of interested parties and potential disputes allows us to plan for notices and anticipate likely objections. This upfront work minimizes surprises and helps formulate a focused strategy for any required filings or negotiations.
We request and organize all pertinent documents, including the original trust, amendments, wills, beneficiary designations, property titles, and financial statements. Accurate records of trustee actions and communications with beneficiaries are important to support the factual basis of any petition. Comprehensive document assembly enables precise drafting of the petition, strengthens declarations, and reduces delays that arise from incomplete records. Early organization also facilitates efficient service of notice and prepares parties for a smoother hearing process if required.
We identify beneficiaries, contingent beneficiaries, trustees, and any other parties with a legal interest in the trust. Anticipating potential objections allows us to address concerns through dialogue or supporting evidence early in the process. This analysis informs the content of the petition, the scope of required notice, and whether settlement discussions are likely to succeed. Clear identification of parties also helps ensure compliance with statutory notice requirements and reduces the risk of a challenge based on lack of proper notice.
During the second step, we draft the petition, proposed order, and supporting declarations, ensuring that each filing clearly states the requested relief and the legal grounds for it. We attach relevant exhibits and compile evidence that supports the settlor’s intent or the reasons for correction. Once prepared, we file the petition with the appropriate probate court and arrange for service on all required parties. Properly prepared petitions decrease the likelihood of continuances and help the court evaluate the matter efficiently.
Clear pleadings explain the nature of the requested modification, reference pertinent trust provisions, and lay out factual support for the court’s review. Supporting declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or other witnesses provide context and documentary evidence. Including a proposed order and, where applicable, agreed-upon language for the amendment helps the court act decisively. Thoughtful drafting reduces ambiguity and helps streamline the court’s review of the petition at hearing.
After filing, we ensure that all interested parties receive proper notice according to California probate rules. Proper service is critical to avoid challenges on procedural grounds and to give beneficiaries the opportunity to respond. We handle the logistics of service, prepare proof of service documents, and monitor deadlines for objections or responses. Timely and accurate notice supports the integrity of the proceeding and helps move the matter toward resolution.
Once the petition is filed and parties have been notified, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the requested modification. We prepare clients for hearings by organizing testimony, exhibits, and legal argument. If the court grants the petition, we assist with drafting the final order and implementing the amended terms, including updating trust records and advising trustees on their revised duties. If the petition is contested, we present the factual record and legal arguments to protect client interests while seeking an efficient resolution.
Preparation for hearings includes organizing witness declarations, documentary exhibits, and legal authorities that support the modification request. We advise clients on procedural expectations and present a coherent narrative that explains why the change is necessary and consistent with the settlor’s intent. Being well-prepared reduces the likelihood of continuances and strengthens the case for a favorable ruling. We aim to make the hearing process as clear and manageable as possible for clients and trustees.
After the court issues an order, we assist with implementing the changes by updating trust records, advising the trustee on revised administration steps, and preparing any ancillary documents such as revised inventories or accountings. Proper implementation ensures the trust continues to operate under the updated terms and that beneficiaries receive distributions consistent with the court’s order. We also provide guidance on documentation retention and next steps to reduce the chance of future disputes or misunderstandings.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate court asking for approval to change specific terms of an existing trust. It is necessary when parties cannot implement changes through straightforward amendment methods or when the trust lacks clear authority for the desired change. Typical reasons for petitions include correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous provisions, adjusting distributions due to changed circumstances, or seeking court instructions when trustees face conflicting obligations. The petition sets out the facts, legal grounds, and proposed orders for the court’s review. Filing a petition becomes particularly important when beneficiaries disagree or when the settlor is no longer available to consent. The court evaluates the settlor’s intent, the requested relief’s consistency with the trust’s purpose, and whether the change harms beneficiaries’ rights. When granted, a court order provides enforceable direction to trustees, reducing future uncertainty and offering a clear basis for trust administration under the modified terms.
In some situations, a trust can be modified without court intervention, especially when the trust’s terms provide an amendment mechanism and all relevant parties agree. When trustees and beneficiaries consent to a specific change and follow the trust’s amendment procedures, modifications can be documented and executed outside of court. Informal amendments are often faster and less expensive than formal petitions, but they require clear agreement and adherence to the trust’s stated processes to avoid later challenges. However, when parties cannot reach agreement or when the trust does not permit the desired change, a court petition may be necessary. Court involvement provides a formal record and enforceable order that trustees can rely upon, which can be particularly important when significant assets or competing interests are involved. The decision to proceed informally or through the court depends on the trust’s language, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the nature of the requested modification.
When a petition to modify a trust is filed, California probate rules require notice to interested parties, which generally includes trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes creditors or other parties with a legal interest. The specific parties who must be notified depend on the trust’s terms and the nature of the requested relief. Proper notice is essential to protect parties’ rights and to prevent future challenges based on claims that someone was not given the opportunity to object. Proof of service must be filed with the court to document that required notices were provided. When parties are located outside the jurisdiction, alternative service methods may be necessary, and the court may require additional procedures to ensure fairness. Timely and accurate notice both preserves due process and helps the court evaluate the petition with all relevant perspectives presented.
The duration of a trust modification matter varies widely based on complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether the petition is contested. Simple, uncontested amendments filed with the court and agreed upon by beneficiaries can move relatively quickly, sometimes concluding within a few months. Contested petitions that involve hearings, discovery, or extensive evidentiary submissions may take significantly longer, potentially stretching over many months or longer when appeals are involved. Timely preparation, thorough documentation, and early efforts to communicate with beneficiaries and trustees often shorten the timeline. Promptly addressing procedural requirements and anticipating likely objections reduces the risk of continuances. Working with counsel to prepare a focused petition and to mediate disputes where possible can also speed resolution and reduce overall disruption to trust administration.
Helpful evidence for a trust modification petition includes the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, and beneficiary designations. Communications that reflect the settlor’s intent, drafts showing the evolution of terms, financial records, property titles, and trustee accountings can also support a petition. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals who recall the settlor’s intent may provide helpful context when courts permit extrinsic evidence to clarify ambiguous provisions. Organizing documentary evidence into clear exhibits and attaching supporting declarations that narrate the factual background strengthens the petition. Demonstrating attempts at informal resolution, such as written communications and meetings among interested parties, shows the court that the petition is a measured step aimed at resolving a bona fide issue rather than creating unnecessary litigation. A well-documented record supports clearer judicial decision-making.
Modifying a trust can have tax and creditor implications depending on the nature of the change. For instance, changes that alter distribution timing or beneficiary designations might affect estate or income tax planning. In some cases, creditor claims or rights could be impacted if modifications shift interests among beneficiaries. It is important to evaluate tax consequences and creditor exposure before implementing significant trust changes to avoid unintended financial consequences. Because tax rules and creditor laws are complex and fact-specific, it is wise to review the proposed modification with professionals who understand federal and California rules. This review helps ensure the modification achieves the settlor’s objectives without creating adverse tax liabilities or opening the door to creditor claims that could reduce trust assets available to beneficiaries.
Yes. A petition can request removal of a trustee or modification of trustee powers when a trustee is unable or unwilling to perform duties, has breached fiduciary obligations, or when changing circumstances warrant a different approach to administration. The court evaluates whether removal or changes are necessary to protect beneficiaries’ interests and ensure proper management of trust assets. Requests to adjust trustee authority may be limited to specific powers or may seek comprehensive changes if warranted by the facts. When seeking changes to trusteeship, it is important to provide clear evidence of why the proposed adjustment promotes proper administration. The court considers the trustee’s conduct, competence, and any conflicts of interest. Demonstrating feasible alternatives and proposing successor trustees or oversight mechanisms can help the court fashion a balanced remedy that protects beneficiaries and preserves trust continuity.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the court will consider their objections as part of the petition process. Objections may trigger additional proceedings such as discovery, hearings, or mediation efforts. The court weighs objections against the petition’s factual and legal support, including whether the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether objections raise legitimate concerns about harm to beneficiaries’ rights. Resolving objections often involves negotiation or the presentation of persuasive evidence at hearing. In many cases, early communication and settlement discussions can narrow issues or produce mutually agreeable terms. When disputes remain, the court’s decision will determine the outcome, and parties may have limited rights to appeal depending on the issues and procedural posture.
Alternatives to a court petition include negotiated amendments, trust restatements, or mediation to resolve disputes among trustees and beneficiaries. When all interested parties agree, an amendment or restatement may accomplish desired changes without court involvement. Mediation offers a structured setting to explore mutually acceptable solutions while avoiding the time and cost of litigation. These alternatives can preserve relationships and reduce expense when cooperation is possible. However, when agreement cannot be reached or when the trust lacks authority for the change, a court petition provides a definitive legal solution. Choosing the appropriate path depends on the trust’s terms, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the complexity of the issues. A careful assessment helps identify if negotiation, mediation, or a petition best advances the settlor’s objectives and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
Costs for pursuing a trust modification petition vary with the petition’s complexity, the amount of required preparation, and whether the matter is contested. Simple, uncontested petitions may incur modest legal fees related to document preparation, filing costs, and minimal court appearances. Contested matters involve greater expense due to discovery, hearings, and potentially longer litigation timelines. Expenses can also include costs for third-party appraisals or expert witnesses if valuation or technical issues arise. We discuss anticipated costs during the initial consultation and provide transparent estimates based on the matter’s specifics. Whenever possible, we seek efficient resolution paths such as negotiated agreements or focused petitions to control costs. Understanding the likely scope of work early helps clients plan and avoids unexpected expenses as the matter advances through the court process.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas