A Heggstad petition can be essential when real property was intended to be placed in a revocable living trust but title was never changed during the settlor’s lifetime. Residents of Silver Lakes often encounter this situation after a loved one’s death or incapacity, when the trust is in place but the deeds remain in the decedent’s name. This paragraph outlines how a Heggstad petition helps the court recognize trust ownership so property transfers to the trustee without full probate. The process preserves the settlor’s intent, reduces delay, and can ease transfer to beneficiaries under the trust’s terms.
When property was meant to be part of a trust but paperwork was incomplete, family members face uncertainty about title and the proper transfer path. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that the trust is entitled to the property despite a defect in the recorded title. This legal remedy is often used alongside related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills and certifications of trust. The petition clarifies ownership for escrow companies, county recording offices, and third parties, making it possible to manage, refinance, or sell real property according to the trust’s instructions without unnecessary delay.
A Heggstad petition provides a practical path to correct title issues when deeds were not retitled into an existing trust. This remedy reduces the need for a time-consuming probate administration and helps beneficiaries and trustees obtain clear title for real property. Court approval under a Heggstad petition gives peace of mind to financial institutions, title insurers, and potential buyers by establishing that the property belongs to the trust as intended by the settlor. The petition supports efficient asset management, allows for compliance with lender or escrow requirements, and helps avoid the administrative complexity associated with formal probate proceedings.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has a long history of assisting California families with trust administration, estate planning, and probate-related matters. Our approach to Heggstad petitions focuses on careful document review, clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and diligent handling of court filings. We draw on experience in preparing complementary trust documents such as pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and trust modification petitions to present a complete picture to the court. Clients appreciate practical guidance during an often emotional time as we work to resolve title defects and facilitate the prompt transfer of property into the trust.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property should be treated as trust property despite being titled in another name, typically the decedent’s. This legal procedure is grounded in California case law and is commonly pursued when deeds were not updated to reflect trust ownership. The petition clarifies the trust’s rights, enabling trustees to manage, refinance, or sell real estate without full probate. Preparing a petition requires assembling the trust instrument, supporting affidavits or declarations, property records, and any related estate planning documents to demonstrate the settlor’s intent and the trust’s validity.
The process begins with a thorough review of the trust and the property’s chain of title to identify any discrepancies. Supporting evidence typically includes the trust document, a certification of trust or copy of the trust, deeds, and any communications showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. The petition requests a court order that the property be recognized as trust property and, where appropriate, that title may be transferred or recorded in the name of the trustee. The ultimate aim is to align recorded ownership with the settlor’s estate plan so assets pass according to the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is a narrowly focused probate petition used when there is clear evidence that the decedent intended real property to be held in trust but formal title transfer was not completed. The petition is employed to obtain a judicial declaration that the trust owns the property or that the trustee has authority to record a corrected deed. It is an efficient alternative to full probate for real property title issues and is generally limited to assets that are properly shown to have been meant for trust ownership. The court evaluates documentary evidence and declarations to issue an order to resolve the title defect.
Key elements in a Heggstad petition include the original or a certified copy of the trust, a declaration from the trustee or other party with first-hand knowledge, copies of the deed or other property records, and a proposed order for the court to sign. The process typically starts with document gathering and client interviews, followed by drafting the petition and supporting declarations, filing with the probate court, serving interested parties and creditors as required, and attending a brief hearing if the court requests additional information. Once the court issues an order, the record can be updated to reflect the trustee’s ownership of the property.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the Heggstad petition process. Terms such as trust, trustee, settlor, deed, title, and probate have specific legal meanings that affect how property is transferred. Knowledge of these terms clarifies responsibilities and expectations, particularly when coordinating with title companies and county recording offices. Clear definitions can reduce confusion during document preparation, service of process, and court proceedings. The glossary below defines essential concepts in plain language so clients can participate confidently in decisions affecting trust property and estate administration.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a person, often called the settlor, places assets under the management of a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries. Trusts can be used to avoid probate, provide ongoing asset management, and specify conditions for distribution. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trust document itself is primary evidence of the settlor’s intent to have property held and managed under the trust. Properly funded assets are titled in the trustee’s name for the trust’s benefit, but a Heggstad petition addresses situations where a deed was not recorded to reflect that intent.
A Heggstad petition is a request to the probate court to proclaim that certain property is part of an existing trust even though the public records do not reflect that ownership. It is named after a landmark California case interpreting circumstances when documentary evidence and surrounding facts demonstrate the settlor’s intent. The petition seeks a judicial declaration so trustees may record corrected deeds or otherwise manage the property without the delays and expenses of a full probate administration. The petition focuses on resolving title discrepancies for specific assets intended for trust ownership.
A deed is the written instrument used to transfer interest in real property, and title refers to the legal concept of ownership recognized by courts and recorded in county records. Discrepancies between the intended ownership under a trust and what is shown on recorded deeds can create obstacles for trustees. Title companies and lenders typically rely on the recorded deed, so a Heggstad petition may be necessary to reconcile the trust’s ownership with the deed. Once the court issues an order, the trustee can often record a new deed or otherwise clear the title.
A certification of trust is a shorter document that provides key facts about a trust—such as the trust’s existence, the identity of the trustee, and the trustee’s authority—without revealing the trust’s detailed provisions. Many title companies accept a certification of trust in place of a full trust document when confirming the trustee’s authority to transfer or encumber trust property. In Heggstad petition matters, a certification of trust can accompany the petition and evidence to support the trustee’s claim to the property while protecting privacy for sensitive trust terms.
When property intended for a trust is not properly retitled, interested parties may consider different approaches, including a Heggstad petition, a full probate administration, or informal resolution through title companies. A Heggstad petition is streamlined and focused, aiming to correct title for specific assets without opening a wide probate case. Probate administration may be needed if the estate has significant non-trust assets or disputes that require broader court supervision. Informal options depend on title insurer acceptance and the nature of the defect. The right path depends on asset mix, timing, costs, and family circumstances.
A limited Heggstad petition is often sufficient when there is solid documentary evidence that the settlor intended to place specific property into the trust. Such documentation can include a valid trust instrument, declarations or affidavits describing the settlor’s instructions, trust-related correspondence, and deeds or escrow instructions showing the intent to fund the trust. When the facts are straightforward and there are no competing claims, the court can address title for the particular asset without the broader scope of probate. This focused approach minimizes time and court involvement while aligning recorded ownership with the trust’s terms.
A limited approach is appropriate when only a few assets are affected and the parties involved—trustees, beneficiaries, and potential claimants—are generally cooperative. If title issues are isolated and beneficiaries agree on the settlor’s intent, the Heggstad petition can efficiently resolve the specific defect. Cooperation reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and allows the court to issue an order that facilitates recording a corrected deed. In contrast, widespread title issues or disputes among interested parties may require broader probate proceedings or additional litigation to protect all parties’ rights.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when multiple assets have title defects, when assets are mixed between estate and trust ownership, or when the asset portfolio includes complex holdings like retirement accounts or business interests. In such cases, more extensive review and coordination among different documents are required to ensure that each asset is properly addressed. Full probate administration, trust modification petitions, or related claims might be needed to create a complete and legally defensible path for transferring assets according to the settlor’s intent and applicable law.
When disputes arise among beneficiaries, creditors assert claims, or there are questions about the trust’s validity, a comprehensive legal strategy is often prudent. These conflicts can complicate a straightforward Heggstad petition and may require additional petitions, motions, or settlement negotiations. A broader plan addresses potential challenges proactively, coordinates discovery and testimony if needed, and seeks to protect the trustee and beneficiaries while resolving contested issues. Courts may require more extensive evidence and hearings in contested matters, so thorough preparation is important to achieve a reliable outcome.
A comprehensive approach to trust funding and title correction considers the full range of the estate plan, identifying how deeds, beneficiary designations, retirement accounts, and other instruments interact. This holistic review reduces the risk of overlooking assets that require different procedures and helps prevent future disputes or additional court filings. By coordinating all relevant steps—such as preparing pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and any necessary trust modification petitions—the trustee can execute transactions with greater confidence that they comply with the settlor’s documented intentions and California law.
Comprehensive planning also improves communications with title companies, lenders, and county recorders by presenting clear documentation and court orders when needed. This reduces delays in transactions like sales or refinancing, and makes it easier to obtain title insurance or lender approvals. Taking a full view allows trustees to address tax, creditor, and beneficiary concerns, and to implement protective measures for vulnerable beneficiaries. The result is a smoother administration process and a stronger foundation for future asset management under the trust.
One key benefit of a comprehensive approach is obtaining clear title that facilitates transactions such as sale, refinance, or transfer of real property. Resolving title defects through proper petitions and supporting documentation reassures buyers, lenders, and title insurers that the trustee has authority to act. That clarity reduces delays in escrow and avoids last-minute requests by parties seeking additional proof. When title aligns with trust ownership, trustees can carry out transactions more predictably, protecting beneficiaries and honoring the settlor’s documented intentions for the property.
Addressing title issues and related estate planning matters proactively reduces the risk of future disputes that could reopen matters in court. By resolving defects, filing necessary petitions, and documenting trustee authority, the administration of the trust becomes more defensible against later challenges. This approach can minimize administrative burdens on trustees and beneficiaries, prevent unexpected hurdles during transactions, and create a clearer record for any future inquiries. A well-documented process protects all parties and supports a timely and orderly distribution of assets in accordance with the trust.
Start by assembling the trust document, any trust amendments, the deed to the property, and related escrow or closing records. Also collect identification for the trustee and beneficiaries, previous correspondence about funding, and any certificates of trust or pour-over wills that relate to the property. Having comprehensive documentation simplifies drafting the petition and supporting declarations. Accurate records help demonstrate the settlor’s intent and make it easier to address questions from the court or title companies, potentially shortening the timeline for obtaining a corrective order and recording the trustee’s interest.
When preparing a Heggstad petition, be ready to present a concise narrative supported by documents explaining why the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust. Declarations from the trustee or from individuals with direct knowledge can be persuasive when paired with the trust instrument and documents that show steps taken toward funding during the settlor’s lifetime. A well-organized, evidence-based presentation helps the court reach a clear determination and supports the goal of avoiding larger probate proceedings.
You may consider a Heggstad petition if deeds were not retitled into a trust as intended, if escrow or title companies require a court order to accept trust ownership, or if there is a need to transfer or sell property promptly after the settlor’s death. The petition aligns recorded title with the trust’s terms and can avoid the delays and costs of formal probate for that particular asset. It also supports clear communications with lenders and insurers, facilitating transactions and administrative tasks that trustees must perform in managing trust property.
Another common reason to pursue this petition is when beneficiaries or trustees want certainty about ownership before making decisions like listing property for sale or refinancing. Clarifying title through the court allows trustees to act with authority and reduces risk for all parties involved. If potential creditors, co-owners, or other interested persons could raise questions about ownership, the petition creates a definitive court order that helps resolve disputes and permits the trustee to carry out duties under the trust consistent with California law and the settlor’s documented wishes.
Typical circumstances include when real property remained titled in the decedent’s name despite the existence of a trust, when a bank or title company will not accept a trust certification alone, or when a deed contains a defect such as an incorrect vesting or missing signature. Other scenarios involve mixed assets where retirement accounts or titled property are not aligned with trust documents, or where heirs seek a definitive court resolution to avoid future disputes. In these situations, the Heggstad petition addresses specific title defects while supporting broader estate administration goals.
Sometimes property that the settlor intended to place into a trust remains recorded in their name due to oversight, timing issues, or overlooked closing steps. When that occurs, trustees may find themselves without recorded authority to transfer or manage the asset. A Heggstad petition clarifies the settlor’s intent and requests the court to declare that the property is trust property, allowing the trustee to proceed with transactions or management tasks that rely on clear title. Acting to correct the record helps ensure the trust operates as planned for beneficiaries.
Title companies and lenders sometimes require a court order when the recorded deed does not match the trust documents or when the trustee’s authority is not obvious from public records. In such cases, a Heggstad petition provides the judicial confirmation necessary to satisfy third-party requirements. Once the court issues an order recognizing the trust’s ownership or the trustee’s authority, title companies can proceed with issuing title insurance and lenders can complete transactions with confidence. This avoids protracted negotiation and potential denial of services.
Errors in deeds, such as incorrect legal descriptions, omitted signatures, or improper vesting, can undermine the transfer of property into a trust. When such defects prevent straightforward recording of a corrected deed, a Heggstad petition helps the court acknowledge the settlor’s intent despite the imperfections. The petition presents evidence that the settlor intended the property to be trust-held and requests the court to authorize an appropriate remedy. Resolving deed errors through court action enables trustees to update records and manage property according to the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides guidance to families in Silver Lakes and nearby communities on issues related to trust funding and Heggstad petitions. We assist with assembling the necessary trust documents, drafting petitions and declarations, handling required notice and service, and working with the probate court to obtain orders that clear title. Our focus is on practical solutions that align recorded ownership with the settlor’s intent so trustees and beneficiaries can manage or transfer property without unnecessary delay or expense.
Selecting legal support for a Heggstad petition matters because careful preparation affects how quickly and smoothly the court can resolve title issues. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients by reviewing trust documents, compiling evidence of intent, and preparing petitions tailored to the specific property and facts. We prioritize clear explanations about procedures, timelines, and interactions with title companies or lenders, helping trustees make informed choices and move transactions forward while preserving the settlor’s plan for the property.
Clients receive guidance on determining whether a Heggstad petition is the most efficient remedy or whether a broader approach is needed. We coordinate service of process, handle required filings, and prepare any proposed recording documents the court may order. By addressing both the legal and administrative aspects of title correction, we help minimize disruptions to pending transactions and reduce the potential for future disputes. Our role is to support trustees and beneficiaries through a structured process that seeks clear legal recognition of the trust’s ownership.
In addition to preparing petitions, we help clients evaluate related trust matters such as certifications of trust, pour-over wills, and potential need for trust amendments or trust modification petitions. When issues extend beyond a single title defect, we propose practical strategies that consider timing, costs, and the needs of beneficiaries. This comprehensive outlook helps ensure a durable resolution that honors the settlor’s intentions and facilitates efficient post-death administration of trust property within Silver Lakes and throughout San Bernardino County.
Our process begins with a document review and client interview to confirm the trust’s terms and the property’s chain of title. We identify required evidence, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and coordinate service on interested parties. After filing with the probate court, we monitor the case, respond to any inquiries, and present a clear record to the judge to obtain an order recognizing the trust’s ownership or authorizing recording. Once the order is issued, we assist with recording documents to align public records with the court’s decision.
Collecting the trust instrument, deed copies, any related closing documents, and relevant communications establishes the factual foundation for the petition. We also identify who will be served, whether creditor notice is necessary, and any potential obstacles. With these documents in hand, we plan the petition strategy, including what declarations will be needed and how to present the settlor’s intent. Early planning helps streamline the filing process and anticipates common issues the court or title parties may raise.
A careful review of the trust and the property’s title history is essential to determine the nature of the defect and the best remedy. This review includes checking for prior conveyances, mortgages, easements, and any recorded documents that could affect the trustee’s authority. Understanding the full context ensures the petition addresses the specific legal and factual questions the court will consider and supports a clear path to updating the public record in accord with the trust’s provisions.
Supporting declarations from the trustee, witnesses, or professionals familiar with the settlor’s intent strengthen the petition. Photocopies of the deed, escrow instructions, and any contemporaneous documents suggesting the settlor’s plan are included. We prepare declarations that explain the settlor’s actions and the reasons the property should be treated as trust property. These declarations, together with the trust instrument and certification of trust, provide the court with a clear factual basis to grant the requested relief.
After preparing the petition and exhibits, we file the matter with the probate court and arrange for proper service on required parties. This step ensures due process and gives interested persons the opportunity to respond. The court may require additional documentation or schedule a brief hearing. We handle communication with the court and any responding parties, aiming to resolve questions efficiently so the judge can issue an order that clarifies the trust’s ownership of the property and permits the trustee to proceed with record changes or transactions.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and any parties with potential claims is required under California probate rules. We ensure service complies with statutory requirements and follow up on any responses or objections. If objections arise, we assess whether they can be resolved through additional documentation or whether a hearing will be necessary. Our goal is to address disputes promptly while protecting the trustee’s ability to act in the trust’s interest and obtain a clear court order.
Some courts decide Heggstad matters on the written record while others may call for a brief hearing. We prepare a focused presentation of the facts and law that supports the petition, respond to any court inquiries, and attend hearings when required. By presenting the trust, supporting declarations, and documentary evidence in a clear manner, we seek a prompt judicial determination that aligns recorded title with the trust. Once the court signs an order, we assist with the steps needed to reflect the court’s decision in public records.
After the court issues an order, the trustee can record any court-authorized deed or obtain title instruments that reflect the trust’s ownership. We help prepare recording documents, coordinate with title companies and county recorders, and ensure that lenders or escrow agents receive the court order and certification of trust they require. These final steps complete the transfer process and enable trustees to manage or sell property in accordance with the trust, providing closure and clarity for beneficiaries and interested parties.
Recording the court’s order and any authorized corrected deed is essential to update public title records. We prepare documents in the correct form for county recording, confirm appropriate fees, and work with the recorder’s office and title insurers to ensure the order is accepted. Accurate recording protects future purchasers and lenders by making the trustee’s ownership visible in the public record, thereby facilitating transactions and reducing the potential for renewed disputes over title.
Title companies and lenders may require additional documentation such as a certification of trust, trustee identification, and proof of the court order. We coordinate this exchange so escrow matters can proceed without unnecessary delay. Addressing their requirements promptly helps trustees finalize sales, refinancing, or other transactions that depend on clear title. A collaborative approach with these third parties ensures the court’s order achieves its intended practical effect in the marketplace and with lending institutions.
A Heggstad petition is a petition filed in probate court asking for a judicial declaration that certain real property should be treated as trust property even though the public records show the property in another name, commonly the decedent’s. It is appropriate when the settlor clearly intended the property to be held in a revocable living trust but a deed was not recorded to reflect that intent. The petition presents the trust document, supporting declarations, and other evidence to show the settlor’s intent and requests an order allowing the trustee to record corrected title or otherwise exercise authority over the property. Consider a Heggstad petition when you need clear title to manage, refinance, or sell property that was intended to be in a trust, and when other parties such as title insurers or lenders require a court order to proceed. The petition focuses on specific assets rather than opening a full probate estate and can be more efficient when facts are straightforward and parties are cooperative. Preparing the petition carefully is important to satisfy court and third-party requirements for recording and title insurance.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition depends on the court’s schedule, the completeness of the filed documents, and whether any interested party contests the petition. In uncontested cases with thorough documentation, a petition can often be resolved within a few weeks to a few months, subject to filing and hearing schedules. If the court rules based primarily on written materials, the process can be quicker, but if a hearing is required or if objections arise, the timeline can extend appreciably and may require additional preparation and responses. Court administration tasks, service on interested parties, and coordination with title companies also influence the timeline. Early assembly of trusts, deeds, and supporting declarations helps move the matter forward more quickly. Working with counsel to anticipate notice requirements and evidentiary needs can shorten delays, while contested proceedings or complex title issues naturally require more time to resolve via the probate court process.
Common documents needed for a Heggstad petition include the trust instrument and any amendments, a certification of trust if available, copies of the deed and property records, declarations from the trustee or persons with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intent, and any escrow or closing documents that indicate the settlor’s actions toward funding. Additional supporting materials might include correspondence, contemporaneous notes, or other records that corroborate the trust funding intent. Accurate identification of interested parties and their addresses is also required for proper service. Depending on the county and specific circumstances, the court may request a proposed order or additional declarations addressing liens, mortgages, or potential creditor claims. Title companies or lenders might require a certification of trust, proof of the trustee’s identity, and the court order once obtained. Preparing a complete package tailored to the facts reduces the risk of delays or requests for further documentation from the court.
Yes. Proper notice and service on heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties are generally required under probate rules to ensure due process. Notice gives these parties the opportunity to respond or object and helps prevent later challenges based on lack of notice. Identifying and serving the correct parties, including creditors where necessary, is a foundational part of filing a Heggstad petition and contributes to the petition’s legitimacy and finality once the court issues an order. Failure to provide required notice can lead to delays or the need to re-serve parties, which extends the timeline and increases administrative work. Working with counsel to identify interested persons and to follow the county’s service rules helps ensure the petition proceeds without procedural defects. When parties are cooperative, the notice process is often straightforward and aids in achieving a prompt resolution.
A Heggstad petition can address certain deed errors or missing signatures when those defects prevent a straightforward recording that reflects trust ownership. The petition allows the court to consider the settlor’s intent and issue an order that either recognizes the trust’s ownership or authorizes corrective action. The court will evaluate documentary evidence and declarations to determine whether the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust despite the deed issue and whether a judicial remedy is appropriate. If the defect is minor and can be corrected administratively, title companies may accept corrected documents without court intervention, but when there is any question or third-party refusal, filing a Heggstad petition provides judicial confirmation. The petition therefore protects the trustee and subsequent transactions by establishing an authoritative record that addresses the defect.
A Heggstad petition is narrower in scope than full probate. It focuses on correcting title or recognizing that a particular asset belongs to a trust, whereas probate administration addresses the broader settlement of an estate, distribution of all probate assets, creditor claims, and appointment of an estate personal representative. Heggstad petitions are intended to be a targeted remedy to align specific recorded assets with trust documents and do not open a general probate administration for all estate matters unless additional circumstances require it. Because of its narrower focus, a Heggstad petition can often be quicker and less expensive than full probate when the issues are limited to particular assets and when interested parties are generally in agreement. When multiple estate matters are contested or when numerous non-trust assets must be administered, full probate may still be necessary to comprehensively resolve all outstanding matters.
Courts routinely issue orders in Heggstad petitions, and title companies and lenders often accept properly prepared court orders and supporting documentation, including certifications of trust and trustee identification. The court’s order provides formal recognition that the trust is entitled to the property, which helps title insurers and lenders rely on the trust’s ownership when issuing title insurance policies or closing transactions. Cooperation from these third parties depends on the clarity of the court order and accompanying evidence. Some title companies have specific requirements and may request additional documentation or confirmation before issuing coverage. Coordination between counsel, the trustee, and the title company early in the process helps identify any extra materials needed so that once the court acts, the practical steps for recording and insuring title proceed more smoothly and without unnecessary extra steps.
If an interested party objects to the petition, the court will consider their objections and may schedule a hearing to evaluate competing evidence and arguments. Objections can raise questions about the trust’s validity, the settlor’s intent, or whether the property is properly the subject of a Heggstad petition. When objections are raised, parties often exchange additional declarations and documents and may seek a resolution through negotiation, supplemental filings, or a contested hearing before the court. Resolving objections can add time and expense to the process, but courts weigh the submitted evidence and apply established principles to determine whether the trust’s claim to the property should be recognized. Promptly addressing objections with thorough documentation and reasoned legal arguments increases the chance of a favorable ruling and limits prolonged litigation.
Heggstad petitions are relatively common in California where revocable living trusts are widely used but administrative oversights leave certain assets titled outside the trust. Because many estate plans rely on a combination of trusts and other documents, occasional funding errors occur, and the Heggstad petition provides a well-established judicial remedy to correct those errors for specific assets. Probate courts in California are familiar with these petitions and the standards for establishing the settlor’s intent to have property held by the trust. While common, not every title issue requires a Heggstad petition; some matters can be addressed by title insurers or through administrative corrections. The petition is particularly useful when clear documentary evidence supports trust ownership but recorded deeds fail to reflect it, or when third parties insist on a court order to accept the trustee’s authority.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients by reviewing trust and title documentation, preparing a clear petition and supporting declarations, coordinating service on interested parties, and guiding the matter through the probate court to obtain an order addressing the title defect. We work with trustees to assemble the information title companies and lenders may require and help with the recording of court-authorized documents to align public records with the trust. Our focus is practical resolution so trustees can manage property according to the settlor’s plan. We also advise on related estate planning tools such as certifications of trust, pour-over wills, and trust modification petitions when broader remedies are needed. That integrated view helps trustees and beneficiaries determine whether a targeted Heggstad petition is appropriate or whether additional steps should be pursued to address multiple assets or potential disputes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas