If you are considering a trust modification petition in Silver Lakes, this guide explains the steps, considerations, and practical options available under California law. A trust modification petition asks the court to approve changes to an existing trust when parties cannot accomplish the change through the trust’s own amendment procedures or when the modification affects third party rights. This page covers when a petition may be appropriate, what evidence and documentation are typically needed, how the process generally proceeds in local probate courts, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with preparing clear, court-ready pleadings tailored to your situation.
Trust modification matters can involve sensitive family dynamics and significant financial consequences, so understanding legal pathways ahead of time helps you make informed choices. A petition can address issues like mistakes in trust drafting, changes in law or circumstances, unclear terms, or the need to add or remove beneficiaries or trustees. This resource offers plain-language explanations of common scenarios, the types of relief a court can grant, and practical tips for gathering supporting evidence. If you live in or near Silver Lakes, the information here will help you decide whether a trust modification petition is the right next step for your estate plan.
A trust modification petition provides a formal legal path to correct or adapt a trust when informal amendments are unavailable or disputed. Filing a petition can bring clarity to ambiguous trust provisions, correct errors, and align the trust with the current intentions of the settlor or with changes in family or financial circumstances. It also minimizes the risk of future litigation by placing the requested modifications on the court record and resolving disputes among interested parties. For families in Silver Lakes, using this process can preserve trust assets, protect beneficiary interests, and ensure that the trust functions as intended under California probate rules.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California from a client-focused perspective, handling trust matters with careful legal analysis and practical problem solving. Our approach centers on identifying the desired outcome, assessing the trust language and surrounding facts, and preparing persuasive court filings that clearly explain why the requested modification is appropriate. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to gather necessary evidence, draft declarations and supporting documents, and present a coherent case to the probate court. Our aim is to resolve trust issues with minimal disruption while protecting client interests throughout the process.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court asking for permission to change a trust when direct amendment is not feasible or when third party rights could be affected. California law recognizes several bases for modification, including rectification for drafting errors, grounds based on changed circumstances, and judicial reform to effectuate the settlor’s intent. The petition must show why a court order is necessary and present evidence supporting the proposed change. For many clients, the petition clarifies competing interpretations of trust provisions and provides a final, enforceable resolution that reduces future disputes among beneficiaries and trustees.
The process typically begins with a careful review of the trust document and related records, interviews with interested parties, and a strategy session to assess the strength of the case. Evidence might include correspondence, prior drafts, declarations from witnesses, and financial records. Notices often must be provided to beneficiaries and other interested persons, and the court will evaluate whether the proposed modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and equitable under the circumstances. Courts may fashion relief ranging from narrow corrections to broader reforms, depending on the facts presented and the legal basis for the request.
A trust modification petition asks a court to alter the terms of an existing trust when parties cannot accomplish the change through the trust’s amendment clause or when the trust contains mistakes or ambiguities. Common situations include correcting typographical or drafting mistakes, adjusting terms to reflect the settlor’s actual intent, dealing with changes in family structure, or addressing unforeseen tax or asset management needs. The petition must explain the legal basis for the requested change, demonstrate proper notice to interested parties, and provide factual support. Understanding these elements helps petitioners prepare a persuasive and procedurally compliant filing.
Key elements of a successful trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested change, supporting factual declarations, relevant documentary evidence, and legal authorities that justify court intervention. The filing must identify all interested persons, provide required notices, and explain why the requested relief is necessary rather than obtainable by informal amendment. Courts balance the settlor’s intent with the rights of beneficiaries, considering fairness and public policy. Understanding procedural timelines, required forms, and evidentiary standards will help you navigate the process efficiently and present a compelling case in probate court.
Below are concise definitions of common terms you will encounter when considering a trust modification petition in California. These terms explain legal concepts, procedural roles, and the types of relief courts can grant. Familiarity with this vocabulary will make it easier to communicate with counsel, understand filed pleadings, and follow court proceedings. If you have questions about how any of these terms apply to your situation, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can provide personalized guidance and help translate these concepts into the specifics of your trust matter.
A trust modification petition is a formal pleading filed in probate court requesting the court to change or reform the terms of an existing trust. The petition typically explains the reasons the modification is necessary, identifies interested parties, and presents supporting evidence. Courts may grant modifications to reflect the settlor’s true intent, correct mistakes, or respond to changed circumstances. Filing a petition creates a public record of the proposed change and usually requires notice to beneficiaries and other interested persons, giving them an opportunity to respond or object.
Rectification refers to a judicial remedy that corrects a trust document when the written terms do not accurately reflect the settlor’s actual intention due to a mistake in drafting. To obtain rectification, the petitioner must typically present convincing evidence showing the intended terms and how the current document deviates from that intention. Courts may order the trust instrument corrected so that the document aligns with what the settlor meant. This process helps prevent outcomes that would frustrate the settlor’s purpose for creating the trust.
Settlor intent refers to the original goals and intentions of the person who created the trust. Courts prioritize carrying out the settlor’s intent when interpreting or reforming trust provisions. Evidence of intent may include draft documents, correspondence, financial records, and testimony from witnesses who were familiar with the settlor’s wishes. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent is often central to petitions seeking correction or modification of trust language that is ambiguous or inconsistent with other aspects of the estate plan.
Interested persons are individuals or entities with a legal or financial stake in the trust, such as current beneficiaries, remainder beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes creditors. When filing a trust modification petition, proper notice to interested persons is required so they have the opportunity to participate in the proceedings or object to the proposed changes. The notice process includes serving documents and complying with local probate rules. Courts will evaluate whether notice was adequate when deciding whether to grant requested relief.
When considering changes to a trust, you may have several paths available, including using an amendment clause, negotiating a settlement among interested parties, or filing a trust modification petition in court. Informal amendment is often the fastest and least costly route when the trust permits it and all necessary parties agree. Settlement agreements can resolve disputes without court involvement but may require careful drafting to ensure enforceability. A court petition becomes necessary when parties disagree, the trust lacks an amendment mechanism, or the change affects third party rights. Each option carries different procedural and evidentiary demands and varying timelines and costs.
A limited approach can be appropriate when the trust contains a valid amendment clause and every person with a legal interest in the trust agrees to the proposed change. In such cases, parties may execute a trust amendment or enter into a written agreement that modifies trust terms without court proceedings. This path avoids the time and expense of litigation and keeps matters private. Documentation should be drafted carefully to ensure it meets legal requirements and fully reflects the agreed changes so that the amendment will be honored by trustees and third parties who later review the trust.
Situations that involve minor corrections or clarifications that do not materially affect beneficiary rights can often be handled without a court petition. Examples include correcting typographical errors, clarifying ambiguous terms that are not central to distribution schemes, or updating administrative provisions such as where notices should be sent. In these circumstances, a narrowly tailored amendment or a signed clarification from the parties may suffice. It is important to ensure any such change is properly documented and executed to avoid later disputes about validity or enforceability.
Comprehensive legal representation is often needed when beneficiaries dispute what the settlor intended or when competing claims arise that affect distributions or trustee duties. These matters frequently require detailed factual development, including witness declarations, document analysis, and legal briefing to show why the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intentions. A well-prepared court petition can present the narrative and evidence in a way that assists the judge in making a fair decision. Proper representation helps ensure procedural compliance, effective advocacy, and careful management of potential settlement opportunities.
Complex trust arrangements, tax-sensitive provisions, and modifications that affect creditors or third parties often require a comprehensive legal approach. These matters demand coordinated review of trust terms, tax implications, and potential impacts on beneficiaries and creditors. A court petition may be necessary to obtain authoritative relief and to protect against future disputes. Careful planning and legal analysis help ensure the modification achieves the intended result while minimizing adverse consequences, and representation helps manage communications with all interested parties throughout the process.
Taking a comprehensive approach to a trust modification petition helps ensure that proposed changes are legally sound, clearly documented, and less likely to be challenged in the future. This approach includes full review of the trust instrument, thorough investigation of relevant facts, and preparation of persuasive supporting evidence. By addressing potential objections proactively and presenting a detailed record to the court, you reduce the likelihood of prolonged litigation and unexpected outcomes. For clients in Silver Lakes, this method provides greater certainty and peace of mind about the trust’s future operation.
A comprehensive strategy also allows for planning around tax consequences, creditor concerns, and the practical administration of the trust after modification. It helps align the trust with broader estate planning goals and ensures that trustee responsibilities and beneficiary expectations are clear. Taking the time to address these matters up front can prevent confusion and disputes later, and can make the trust easier to administer. Courts appreciate orderly presentations that demonstrate careful consideration, which often leads to more predictable and favorable outcomes for the parties involved.
A comprehensive modification process produces clear, enforceable trust terms that reflect the settlor’s intent and the negotiated agreements of interested parties. By memorializing changes through a court order or properly executed amendment, beneficiaries and trustees gain clarity about rights and duties. This reduces ambiguity that can lead to disputes and delivers a stable framework for future administration. Clear documentation also aids banks, financial institutions, and other third parties in recognizing trustee authority and carrying out trust instructions without delay.
Addressing potential issues thoroughly helps reduce the risk of later challenges that could deplete trust assets through litigation or require costly remedial actions. When modifications are pursued thoughtfully, with attention to legal and practical consequences, the trust remains a vehicle for efficient asset management and distribution. Courts are more likely to approve changes that are well-supported and equitable, which helps preserve the trust’s economic value and honor the settlor’s objectives. This protective effect benefits both trustees and beneficiaries in the long term.
Collecting clear, organized documentation is an essential early step in preparing a trust modification petition. This includes the current trust instrument, any earlier drafts, related estate planning documents, correspondence or notes demonstrating the settlor’s intentions, and financial records that relate to disputed provisions. Declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent and conversations about the trust can be especially persuasive. Presenting a well-documented factual record helps the court understand the background and supports the legal basis for the requested modification, increasing the odds of a favorable resolution.
Before or during court proceedings, exploring alternative dispute resolution options such as mediation can offer a less adversarial path to resolving trust disputes. Mediation allows parties to work towards a mutually acceptable solution under guided negotiation, which can preserve family relationships and reduce legal costs. When mediation produces an agreement, that settlement can often be incorporated into court orders or trust amendments. Even if mediation does not fully resolve the matter, participation can demonstrate good faith efforts to settle and might streamline issues that ultimately require judicial determination.
People seek trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous provisions, adapting the trust to changes in family or financial circumstances, or resolving disputes about the settlor’s intent. When informal amendment is impossible or contested, a court order may be the only reliable way to make necessary changes while protecting the rights of all interested persons. The petition process provides a structured forum for presenting the facts and arguments needed to obtain clear and enforceable trust revisions under California law.
Another common reason for seeking court-ordered modification is to address administrative or tax issues that affect the trust’s management or distributions. Situations such as trustee incapacity, beneficiary incapacity, changed tax law, or the appearance of unforeseen liabilities can make a court-supervised change prudent. A petition can secure judicial approval for actions that reduce ambiguity or potential future challenges, helping trustees administer the trust efficiently and protecting the long-term interests of beneficiaries.
Typical circumstances that call for a trust modification petition include clear drafting errors that alter distributions, conflicts between multiple trust documents, changes in family composition such as divorce or death, and situations where the settlor’s intent is disputed. Other triggers are legal or tax developments that render trust provisions impractical, or third party claims that require court involvement to resolve. When these issues cannot be settled informally, a petition offers a path to a binding judicial resolution that protects the interests of trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Drafting mistakes or ambiguous language in a trust can lead to unintended distributions or disputes among beneficiaries. When the written document does not reflect the settlor’s actual intentions, a petition for rectification or reform may be appropriate. Such petitions present evidence demonstrating the intended terms and explain how the current language deviates from those intentions. Correcting these errors through the court prevents outcomes that would frustrate the settlor’s plan and reduces the likelihood of costly litigation later on.
Major life events such as divorce, death, births, or changes in a beneficiary’s needs can make existing trust provisions outdated or unfair. In some cases, the trust’s amendment clause may not allow for the needed changes or interested parties may disagree, making a court petition necessary. Courts can approve modifications that align the trust with current circumstances while considering the rights of all interested persons. Addressing these changes proactively helps the trust remain functional and consistent with the settlor’s overall estate planning goals.
Problems involving trustee performance, incapacity, or disagreement on administration can lead to petitions that modify trust terms or replace trustee powers. When trustees and beneficiaries cannot agree on necessary administrative changes, a court may intervene to clarify duties, authorize particular actions, or adjust delegation of responsibilities. Resolving these matters through a petition can restore effective administration, protect trust assets, and ensure beneficiaries receive what was intended under the trust document.
If you are in Silver Lakes and need help with a trust modification petition, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused attention on the facts of your case and the local probate procedures that will apply. We offer assistance in evaluating whether a petition is appropriate, assembling documentary support, preparing and filing court documents, and representing your interests at hearings or settlement conferences. Our goal is to present a clear case that respects procedural rules and positions you for a durable resolution tailored to your trust administration needs.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for trust matters because we combine careful legal preparation with practical solutions aimed at resolving disputes efficiently. We prioritize clear communication so clients understand the process, timelines, and likely outcomes. Our approach focuses on preparing thorough pleadings, gathering persuasive evidence, and engaging with other parties constructively to explore settlement when appropriate. This practical orientation helps clients achieve results while minimizing uncertainty and disruption to trust administration.
We also guide clients through notice requirements and local probate procedures to reduce procedural delays and ensure pleadings meet court expectations. Preparing a petition requires attention to detail, from completing required forms to assembling declarations and exhibits. Our team works closely with clients to compile the necessary documentation and to draft clear legal explanations that support the requested relief. This preparation helps courts understand the facts and legal basis for modification and tends to result in more efficient hearings and clearer outcomes.
Throughout the process, we remain mindful of cost-effective approaches and the potential benefits of negotiation or alternative dispute resolution. When settlement is possible, we aim to memorialize agreements in a manner that provides finality and enforceability. When litigation is necessary, we advocate for client interests at every stage, seeking to resolve disputed issues with a focus on preserving trust value and honoring the settlor’s intentions. Clients value a steady, legally grounded approach that keeps their priorities front and center.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and related documents to assess whether a petition is the appropriate remedy. We then gather evidence, identify interested persons, and prepare the petition and supporting declarations. After filing, we handle service and notice requirements, respond to any objections, and represent you at hearings. Throughout the matter, we prioritize clear communication about developments and options, including settlement opportunities and litigation strategy. This structured process helps clients navigate the probate calendar while preserving legal rights and trust assets.
The first formal step is a thorough evaluation of the trust document, related estate planning records, and the facts that led to the proposed modification. This review identifies the factual and legal basis for a petition, potential obstacles, and the list of interested persons who must be notified. We analyze prior drafts, communications, and administrative records to determine whether rectification, reformation, or another type of relief is most appropriate, and we advise on the likely evidentiary needs to support the requested change.
Collecting documents and obtaining witness statements is a priority early in the process. Relevant records may include draft trust documents, correspondence with attorneys or family members, financial account records, and contemporaneous notes that reflect the settlor’s intentions. Witness statements from people who discussed the settlor’s wishes or who were involved in the drafting process can provide valuable context. These materials are organized as exhibits to declarations that accompany the petition, forming the factual backbone of the requested relief.
Identifying who has an interest in the trust is essential for proper notice and for anticipating potential objections. This includes current and remainder beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes creditors or guardians of incapacitated beneficiaries. Anticipating objections allows us to address them proactively in the petition and supporting materials. Providing clear, timely notice in accordance with probate rules reduces procedural risks and helps ensure that the court can consider the petition on the merits without delays caused by defective service.
Once the factual record is compiled, we draft a petition that sets forth the requested modification, the legal grounds for relief, and the evidence that supports the change. The filing package typically includes declarations, exhibits, and a proposed order for the court to sign. We ensure the petition complies with local court rules and filing requirements and we arrange for service on all interested persons. Accurate and persuasive pleadings increase the likelihood that the court will understand and seriously consider the requested modification.
Drafting the petition involves clearly articulating the specific changes sought and the legal reasons why the court should grant them. Supporting declarations present factual evidence in a sworn format, attaching relevant documents as exhibits. The petition must be coherent and grounded in law so the judge can evaluate whether modification is appropriate. Well-drafted declarations often make the difference between a compelling case and one that leaves key questions unanswered, so careful attention to factual clarity and document organization is critical.
After filing, the petition must be properly served on all interested persons within the timelines required by local rules. Once served, parties may respond or object, and the court may set a hearing. We prepare timely responses to objections, craft declarations addressing disputed issues, and work to narrow contested points when possible. Serving documents correctly and responding promptly to opposing filings keeps the case on track and demonstrates procedural diligence to the court, which can be important when seeking timely relief.
The court will typically schedule a hearing where the parties can present their positions, after which the judge may issue an order granting or denying the requested modification, sometimes with conditions. If the court grants relief, the order becomes part of the official record and guides trustees on carrying out the modified trust terms. Implementation may require updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and taking administrative actions consistent with the order. Ensuring that the order is clear and comprehensive helps prevent future disputes about interpretation or administration.
At hearings, the court reviews the petition, declarations, and any objections to determine whether the proposed modification is justified. Presenting a well-organized record with clear factual support helps the judge understand both the reason for the requested change and the absence of valid objections. We prepare witnesses and declarations to address likely questions and provide succinct legal arguments to support the petition. Being prepared at the hearing stage often expedites a favorable ruling and reduces the chance of remand for further factual development.
Once the court issues an order, the trustee should take steps to implement the changes, including updating trust records, notifying institutions that hold trust assets, and making distributions consistent with the new terms. If the order requires specific actions or timelines, the trustee must comply to avoid potential liability. We assist clients in translating the court order into administrative steps so the trust continues to function smoothly. Clear documentation of these actions helps create a permanent record that supports the trust’s ongoing administration.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court seeking changes to a trust when those changes cannot be achieved informally or are disputed by interested parties. The petition outlines the specific modifications sought and the legal and factual basis for the court to grant relief. It is appropriate when the trust document is ambiguous, contains drafting errors, does not reflect the settlor’s intent, or when changed circumstances make existing terms impractical. The petition process ensures that all interested persons have notice and that any change is enforceable under court order. You should consider a petition when informal amendment is not possible, when beneficiaries disagree about modifications, or when the change would affect third party rights. Before filing, gather relevant documents and consider whether negotiation or mediation could resolve the issue without court involvement. If disagreement persists or the matter is complex, filing a petition provides a clear legal path to obtain a binding resolution that clarifies the trust’s operation going forward.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the need for discovery, and whether interested parties object. Some straightforward petitions with agreement among parties can move more quickly, while contested matters involving multiple witnesses and complex documentary evidence can take several months or longer. Local court calendars and notice requirements also influence the timing, and some petitions require additional time to arrange hearings and respond to objections. Working proactively to compile supporting documentation and to serve notices properly can help streamline the process. Engaging in early communication with other interested persons and exploring settlement options may reduce time spent in contested hearings. Ultimately, the court schedules and the extent of opposition are the primary drivers of the timeline for a petition to reach a final order.
Typical evidence supporting a trust modification petition includes the trust instrument and any earlier drafts, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intentions, financial records, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s wishes or circumstances. Documentary evidence that shows the settlor’s intent or demonstrates a drafting mistake can be crucial, as is any contemporaneous documentation such as notes or letters. Organizing these materials into clear exhibits attached to sworn declarations strengthens the petition. In some cases, expert factual testimony such as tax or financial analysis may be helpful to show why a modification is necessary for proper administration. The key is to present a coherent factual narrative supported by documents and credible witness statements, which together show the court that the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent and is equitable under the circumstances.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested persons have the right to object to a trust modification petition. Notice must be provided to these parties so they can appear, file written responses, and present evidence against the requested modification. Objections may be based on disputes about the settlor’s intent, claims that the requested change harms beneficiary rights, or procedural challenges such as inadequate notice. The court considers these objections in determining whether the petition should be granted. When objections arise, the parties may attempt negotiation or mediation to resolve disputes before hearing. If the matter proceeds to hearing, both sides present evidence and legal arguments. The court will weigh the competing positions and may grant, deny, or modify the requested relief. Addressing potential objections in the initial petition and supporting declarations can reduce the scope of contested issues.
Yes, court-ordered modifications become part of the public record once filed and entered by the court. Probate proceedings and related orders are typically a matter of public record, which means that the details of the petition and resulting order may be accessed through the court’s records. If privacy is a concern, parties sometimes seek narrowly tailored orders or explore settlement agreements that can be kept off the public docket, but such approaches depend on the willingness of interested persons to agree and the court’s approval. Even though the record may be public, the practical effect of a court order is to provide a binding and enforceable resolution. For trustees and financial institutions, a signed court order clarifying the trust’s terms often reduces ambiguity and administrative friction. If confidentiality is a priority, discuss options during case planning to determine whether any elements can be resolved without extensive public filings.
Alternatives to filing a petition include direct amendment under the trust’s amendment clause when all parties agree, negotiated settlements among beneficiaries, and mediation or other forms of dispute resolution. These paths can be faster, less costly, and preserve family relationships by avoiding courtroom conflict. When parties reach an agreement, attorneys can draft an amendment or settlement that the trustee and relevant institutions can rely upon to administer the trust. Such agreements should be carefully drafted to ensure enforceability. However, alternatives are not always feasible. When parties cannot agree or when third party rights are implicated, a petition may be the only reliable means of obtaining binding relief. Evaluating whether negotiation, mediation, or a court petition best suits the situation depends on the facts, the level of disagreement, and the legal issues at stake.
Common defenses to a trust modification petition include claims that the petition fails to reflect the settlor’s true intent, that the requested change would harm beneficiary rights, that notice was inadequate, or that the petitioner lacks standing to seek relief. Opponents may also argue that the petition rests on insufficient evidence or that the proposed modification would result in inequitable outcomes. Procedural defenses based on defective filings or improper service are also sometimes raised to delay or prevent relief. Addressing these defenses requires careful factual and legal work to show why the modification is appropriate and procedurally sound. Anticipating likely objections and providing clear documentary support in advance helps the court evaluate the petition on its merits and reduces the effectiveness of defensive procedural tactics.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary widely depending on the complexity of the case, the amount of document preparation and discovery needed, and whether the matter is contested. Simple petitions with agreement among parties can be completed more affordably, while contested matters involving multiple witnesses, motion practice, and extended hearings will increase costs. Additional factors include court filing fees and potential costs for obtaining certified records or specialty reports. To manage costs, parties should focus on early case assessment, efficient document collection, and exploring settlement options when practical. Clear budgeting and communication about likely fees help clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition or alternative paths. We discuss cost estimates and strategies to control expenses during the initial consultation.
Yes, trustees may request modifications in order to address administrative problems or to obtain court authority for actions beyond their express powers. Examples include clarifying trustee powers, resolving ambiguities that impede administration, or obtaining authority to sell assets or adjust distributions in light of changed circumstances. A trustee-initiated petition sets out the reasons the court should permit administrative changes and explains how the requested relief will facilitate proper trust management while protecting beneficiary interests. When trustees file petitions, courts examine whether the requested modifications are consistent with the settlor’s intent and whether the proposed actions are equitable. Trustees must follow notice requirements and demonstrate that the change is necessary or appropriate for effective trust administration. Proper documentation and legal argumentation help courts evaluate the trustee’s motion and decide whether to grant the requested authority.
If you believe a trust needs modification, begin by gathering the trust document and any related drafts, correspondence, and financial records that speak to the settlor’s intent or the operational problem. Prepare a list of interested persons, including beneficiaries and trustees, and attempt to communicate the issue to see if an informal resolution is possible. Early organization of documents and clear communication often simplify the path forward, whether through amendment, settlement, or a court petition. If informal steps do not resolve the matter or if the trust lacks a clear amendment mechanism, consult legal counsel to assess your options. A lawyer can review the documents, explain the likely bases for a petition, and recommend a strategy tailored to your goals and the local probate rules. Taking these initial steps promptly helps preserve evidence and positions you for a more effective resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas