A Heggstad Petition can resolve a common but complex issue for people who intended assets to be part of a trust but the deeds or titles were not properly transferred during their lifetime. This page explains how a Heggstad Petition works in Chula Vista and San Diego County, who may need one, and how the process can preserve your loved one’s estate plan without full probate. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist families by reviewing trust documents, property records, and the circumstances surrounding the intended transfer to prepare and file a petition with the court when appropriate.
When a property was meant to be held by a living trust but remains in the decedent’s individual name, beneficiaries can face delays, extra costs, and uncertainty. A Heggstad Petition asks the court to recognize that the property should have been part of the trust based on the decedent’s intent and supporting evidence. This guide outlines the steps typically involved, typical evidence courts consider, timelines in San Diego County, and practical tips for gathering documentation so a petition can be prepared efficiently and with attention to preserving beneficiaries’ rights and the settlor’s intentions.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can avoid full probate, streamline title transfers, and honor the decedent’s intended trust plan, benefiting heirs and trust beneficiaries. The petition prompts a judicial determination that specified assets were intended to be trust property, which can eliminate the need for time-consuming probate administration. For families in Chula Vista and throughout San Diego County this can reduce legal costs and speed access to estate assets. The process also helps to clarify records for title companies and county registrars and can prevent future disputes by establishing a clear court-ordered record reflecting the settlor’s intent.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with trust administration and post-death trust issues, including Heggstad Petitions, across California. Our approach focuses on careful document review, clear communication with beneficiaries, and practical strategies to present persuasive evidence of intent to the court. We work to compile deeds, trust documents, correspondence, and other records that support your petition, and we coordinate with title companies and county recorders when necessary. The team strives to resolve matters efficiently while protecting family relationships and minimizing procedural delays that can be stressful during an already difficult time.
A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to declare that certain assets were intended to be held in a trust despite failing to be formally transferred before the settlor’s death. In practice, this often involves real property where a deed was never recorded or personal property where title remained with the deceased. The petition requires evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as a trust document describing the asset, transfer paperwork, or contemporaneous actions indicating the transfer was meant to occur. Courts will consider the surrounding facts and may grant relief so the asset can be administered under the trust rather than through probate administration.
The petition process typically begins with a thorough review of records and a search for relevant documentation that demonstrates intent to include the asset in the trust. Evidence can include draft deeds, trust schedules, declarations, correspondence with legal or financial advisors, and statements from witnesses familiar with the settlor’s plans. Once a petition is drafted, it is filed with the probate court, notice is given to interested parties, and the court assesses the submitted proof. If successful, the court issues an order recognizing the trust’s ownership interest, enabling title transfer and trust administration without a full probate estate.
A Heggstad Petition asks the court to treat an asset as having been owned by a trust at the time of the settlor’s death even though the formal title was never changed. The petition asserts that the settlor intended the property to be trust property and presents evidence to support that claim. The legal standard focuses on intent and contemporaneous documentation or actions that demonstrate a transfer was intended. Success results in a court order recognizing the trust interest and clearing title issues so the trustee can manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms, avoiding the additional steps and expense of probate court transfer.
Preparing a Heggstad Petition requires identifying all assets at issue, compiling the trust instrument and any related schedules, locating deeds or transfer documents, and gathering statements or evidence reflecting the decedent’s intent. Drafting the petition includes a clear factual narrative, citation to relevant California law, and attached exhibits that corroborate the trust intent. The petition is filed in probate court, interested parties receive notice, and the court evaluates evidence at a hearing. Depending on the case, resolution can be accomplished by stipulation among beneficiaries or by a contested hearing if conflicting claims arise.
Understanding the terms used in Heggstad Petitions helps beneficiaries and trustees navigate the process. Important concepts include ‘settlor’ as the person who created the trust, ‘trustee’ as the person who manages trust assets, ‘beneficiary’ as the recipients of trust benefits, and ‘title’ as the legal ownership record for property. Additional relevant items include trust schedules, deeds, and probate filings. Being familiar with these terms will make reviewing documents and discussing options with counsel more productive, and helps families collect the evidence that supports a petition to bring assets into trust administration.
The settlor is the individual who creates a living trust and transfers assets into it during their lifetime. The settlor’s intent in creating the trust and the actions taken toward transferring assets are central to a Heggstad Petition. Evidence that the settlor intended a property to belong to the trust — such as trust language identifying the asset, a draft deed, or other contemporaneous notes — supports a petition. Understanding the settlor’s planning documents and any related correspondence is often key to persuading a court that title should reflect the trust’s ownership.
The trust instrument is the written document that sets out the terms of the living trust, including the identification of the trustee, beneficiaries, and the disposition of trust assets. For a Heggstad Petition, the trust instrument may list or describe assets intended to be in the trust or set forth powers and intentions that show the settlor expected particular property to be included. Attaching relevant sections of the trust instrument to the petition helps the court determine whether the asset at issue should be treated as trust property based on the settlor’s documented plan.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets according to the trust’s terms for the benefit of the beneficiaries. After a Heggstad Petition is granted, the trustee may take title, manage, or distribute the asset as directed by the trust document. The trustee’s role in assembling records and providing testimony or declarations about the settlor’s intent can be important to the court’s evaluation. Trustees must follow fiduciary duties and act in the best interests of beneficiaries while carrying out the trust’s provisions.
Title refers to legal ownership of property as reflected in public records, while a deed is the document used to transfer title. Heggstad Petitions commonly address situations where the title remains in the settlor’s name because a deed was not recorded or completed prior to death. Providing the court with a deed draft, escrow instructions, or other evidence of an attempted transfer can establish that the settlor intended the property for the trust. Once a court recognizes the trust interest, steps are taken to clear title so the trustee can manage or transfer the property according to the trust.
When property is not in a trust but was intended to be, families may consider a Heggstad Petition, full probate, or other corrective filings. Probate is a broader process that administers a decedent’s entire estate through the court and may involve appointment of an administrator, creditor notices, and longer timelines. A Heggstad Petition targets specific assets and can often be completed more quickly and with fewer formalities if persuasive evidence exists. In some cases, a simple deed transfer by a properly appointed personal representative may be appropriate, but when trust administration is preferred, a petition can align title with the trust plan and avoid full probate.
A limited Heggstad Petition may be appropriate when a single parcel of real property or a specific titled asset was clearly intended for trust ownership but the title remains in the decedent’s name. If the trust instrument or contemporaneous documents identify the property and provide direct evidence of intent, a focused petition can address that one asset without opening full probate, saving time and cost. This approach is most effective when interested parties agree or where documentary evidence strongly supports the claim, enabling the court to enter an order recognizing the trust’s interest and authorizing title transfer to the trustee.
When beneficiaries and named parties are in agreement that a particular asset belongs to the trust, a limited petition can often be resolved by stipulation and a court order rather than contested litigation. Agreement reduces the need for extensive testimony or discovery and can speed resolution, allowing the trustee to take title and administer the asset under the trust without the delays and expense of probate administration. Counsel will still compile supporting documents and prepare a clear petition, but an uncontested path frequently results in faster clearance of title and distribution consistent with the trust terms.
When multiple assets were intended for trust ownership, or when heirs or creditors dispute the settlor’s intentions, a more comprehensive legal approach may be required. Complex situations sometimes involve competing declarations, inconsistent documentation, or unclear trust schedules that demand careful investigation, depositions, and legal briefing to resolve. In those instances, counsel coordinates discovery, collects witness declarations, and prepares a thorough factual record for the court. A comprehensive approach aims to secure clear judicial rulings so the estate can be administered properly while protecting the rights of beneficiaries and minimizing future challenges.
Title defects, incomplete escrow histories, or unresolved lender interests can complicate the transfer of property into a trust and may require coordinated legal action. When record issues exist, counsel may need to work with title companies, lenders, county recorders, and escrow agents to clear liens, correct documents, and obtain necessary consents. A full-service response addresses these procedural and documentary hurdles, assembles expert affidavits or declarations where helpful, and presents the court with a comprehensive record supporting the trust claim, so title can be cleared and the trust administration can proceed without lingering encumbrances.
A comprehensive approach reduces the risk of future challenges and ensures that court orders fully reflect the settlor’s intentions and protect beneficiaries’ rights. When all relevant documents, witness statements, and title records are gathered and reviewed, a robust petition presents a persuasive factual record. This can prevent costly rehearings or subsequent disputes and provide certainty to beneficiaries and title companies. Thorough preparation also helps to identify and resolve any lien, creditor, or procedural issues in advance, streamlining the process of placing assets under the trust’s administration.
Careful coordination with county recorders and title companies is another benefit of an encompassing strategy, minimizing the risk of title setbacks after a court order is obtained. The comprehensive route supports accurate entry of orders, proper recording of corrected deeds, and clean transfers to the trustee. It also helps maintain family relationships by addressing potential conflicts proactively, offering clear communication to beneficiaries, and ensuring legal steps are taken to protect the settlor’s plan and intended distribution while reducing the likelihood of future litigation over those assets.
By assembling comprehensive documentation and presenting a clear factual case to the court, a comprehensive petition augments the likelihood that title will be recognized and transferred cleanly into the trust. This reduces administrative headaches for the trustee and the risk that subsequent claimants will dispute ownership. Ensuring clarity in title and trust administration also allows beneficiaries to receive distributions without unnecessary delay and gives successors confidence that the settlor’s arrangements will be followed as intended.
A well-documented petition helps limit the grounds for later disputes by creating a court record that explains the facts and substantiates the settlor’s intent. This deterrent effect reduces the chances of costly, prolonged litigation after title has been transferred to the trust. When beneficiaries and potential claimants see that the factual basis and legal arguments were carefully presented to the court, many challenges are resolved or avoided entirely, which preserves estate assets and reduces emotional strain on family members during trust administration.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, any schedules or lists of trust assets, deeds, escrow instructions, and correspondence concerning the intended transfer. Early retrieval of county recorder documents and title reports helps identify whether deeds were recorded, whether liens exist, or if there are discrepancies that will need addressing. Gathering written evidence and credible witness statements before memories fade strengthens the factual support for a Heggstad Petition. Organizing documents into a clear chronology will help counsel draft a persuasive petition and prepare supporting exhibits for submission to the court.
Consult with title companies, escrow agents, and county recorders early to understand what documentation they require to accept a court order and update title. In some cases, preliminary title reports reveal liens or errors that should be addressed before filing. Coordinating with these third parties can accelerate the process after a court order is obtained, reducing delays in recording corrected deeds. Proactive cooperation helps ensure the court’s order translates into practical resolution of title and ownership so the trustee can manage or distribute property under the trust terms.
A Heggstad Petition is often necessary when a property that was intended to be placed in a living trust remains titled in the decedent’s individual name, creating obstacles for trust administration. Families consider this remedy to avoid the time and expense of full probate, to validate the settlor’s documented plan, and to clarify ownership for title companies and lenders. If the trust instrument and contemporaneous evidence show the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust, filing a petition can align public records with the trust and permit a trustee to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms.
Other reasons to pursue a Heggstad Petition include resolving disputes about intent, facilitating sale or refinancing of a property by clearing title, and preventing future claims that could disrupt trust distributions. When beneficiaries face unexpected delays because an asset remains outside the trust, a successful petition can restore the settlor’s plan and reduce administrative burdens. The petition process focuses on evidence and intent rather than relitigating unrelated estate issues, making it an efficient path when the goal is to bring specific assets into the trust for administration or distribution.
Typical scenarios include properties where a deed was prepared but never recorded, assets purchased with trust funds but titled in the individual’s name, or where a settlor believed a transfer had been completed but paperwork remained unfinished. Similarly, assets listed on trust schedules but lacking recorded title often trigger the need for a petition. These circumstances arise from oversight, timing issues with escrow, or misunderstandings about title transfers, and they commonly surface after the settlor’s death when trustees attempt to administer the trust but encounter title discrepancies.
One common circumstance is when a deed was drafted to transfer property into the trust but was never recorded prior to the settlor’s death. Draft deeds, settlement statements, escrow instructions, or bank records showing payment of closing costs can support the argument that the transfer was intended. A Heggstad Petition can present these documents along with the trust instrument to show intent, allowing the court to recognize the trust’s interest and authorize corrective orders so title can be recorded in the trustee’s name consistent with the trust terms.
Sometimes property purchases are funded from trust assets but title is taken in the individual’s name due to oversight or transaction timing. In such cases, financial records, escrow closing statements, and the trust paperwork showing where funds originated can help demonstrate that the settlor intended the property to be trust-owned. A Heggstad Petition uses that documentary trail to request a court determination that title should be treated as trust property, enabling the trustee to bring the asset into trust administration and distribute or manage it according to the trust instructions.
When trust schedules list certain assets but public records show ownership remains with the decedent, a mismatch exists that can cause delays in administering the trust. This could result from late changes, missed recordings, or clerical errors. A petition that compiles the trust schedule, supporting documents, and any corroborating statements from those involved provides the court with a basis to reconcile the discrepancy. Resolving these mismatches through a judicial order avoids full probate and ensures assets are handled as the settlor intended under the trust.
Our team serves clients in Chula Vista and throughout San Diego County, providing guidance on Heggstad Petitions, trust administration, and clearing title issues that arise after a settlor’s death. We assist trustees and beneficiaries by reviewing documents, preparing petitions, and coordinating necessary notices and filings with the probate court. With familiarity of local court procedures and title practices, we help clients understand realistic timelines and practical next steps, working to obtain an order that integrates the property into the trust and enables timely administration for the benefit of the trust’s beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman bring practical experience handling trust administration and related court petitions throughout California. We focus on building a clear factual record, coordinating with title companies, and presenting persuasive documentation to the probate court. Our attorneys work closely with trustees and families to identify the strongest evidence of intent and to explain the procedural steps involved so clients understand expectations and timelines. We strive to resolve matters efficiently while safeguarding beneficiaries’ interests and honoring the settlor’s documented plan.
We prioritize clear communication and careful preparation to reduce the likelihood of contested hearings and to facilitate orderly trust administration after a successful petition. That includes helping clients gather necessary financial records, deeds, and correspondence, drafting petitions and proposed orders, and ensuring notice is provided to required parties. In cases where matters can be resolved by stipulation, we pursue cooperative solutions that minimize delay and expense. When court hearings are necessary, we prepare a coherent presentation of facts and law to support the petition on behalf of the trustee and beneficiaries.
Clients also benefit from our knowledge of regional title practices and county recorder procedures, which can accelerate the post-order recording process. We coordinate with title companies and escrow agents to ensure that the court order is accepted and deeds are properly recorded, protecting the trustee’s ability to manage or distribute trust property promptly. Throughout the process we emphasize documentation, transparency, and practical problem-solving so the settlor’s intentions are respected and the trust administration proceeds in an orderly fashion.
Our process begins with a document review to identify the assets, trust language, and any deeds or transaction records that support a trust claim. We then advise on the strength of a petition, help collect supporting declarations or witness statements, and prepare the petition and proposed order for filing in the appropriate probate court. After filing, we coordinate service and notice to interested parties, respond to inquiries from title companies, and, if necessary, represent the trustee at a hearing. Our goal is to secure a clear judicial determination so the trust can be administered efficiently.
The first step is a thorough compilation of relevant documents and an assessment of whether the available evidence supports a Heggstad Petition. This includes obtaining the trust instrument, any attached schedules, draft or recorded deeds, escrow or closing statements, bank records showing payments from trust accounts, and any correspondence suggesting the settlor directed the transfer. We also identify interested parties who must be notified. This assessment shapes strategy and clarifies whether a focused petition on a specific asset or a broader approach is needed.
Collecting the trust document and related property records is essential to demonstrate intent. This step involves requesting certified copies of the trust, searching county recorder files, and obtaining title reports that show current ownership and any encumbrances. We review these materials to chart the chain of title, document any attempted transfers, and identify discrepancies between trust schedules and public records. Accurate and organized documentation provides the foundation for a persuasive petition and prepares the facts for presentation to the court.
Gathering witness statements and declarations can strengthen the factual record showing intent to transfer property into the trust. We typically speak with individuals who were involved in the transaction, such as escrow officers, attorneys, or family members who recall the settlor’s directions. Written declarations from these witnesses, combined with documentary proof, provide corroboration that supports the petition. Those statements are prepared carefully to comply with court requirements and to ensure a clear narrative for the judge to consider when evaluating the petition.
After compiling the factual record, we draft a petition that lays out the circumstances, cites applicable law, and attaches supporting exhibits. The petition articulates the settlor’s intent and provides the court with a clear explanation of why the asset should be treated as trust property. We prepare a proposed order for the court to sign and ensure required parties are identified for notice. Filing follows local court rules for probate petitions, and once filed we serve required notices and monitor any responses or objections from interested parties.
Preparing legal filings includes drafting the petition, proposed order, and any supporting declarations or exhibits that will be submitted to the court. We ensure all documents comply with the local probate court’s formatting and filing requirements and prepare the necessary notices to interested parties. Accurate filing and timely service are critical to avoid procedural defects. Once filed, we track responses and work to resolve any procedural objections or requests for additional information so the case continues toward resolution without unnecessary delays.
During the filing stage we often coordinate with title companies, escrow agents, and beneficiaries to address concerns and streamline acceptance of a court order. Title companies may request specific documentation or clarified language in the proposed order before they will update title records. Engaging these parties early helps anticipate their requirements and reduces the chance of post-order complications. Where possible, we seek stipulations or agreements that enable the court to enter an unopposed order recognizing the trust’s interest.
If the petition is contested, a court hearing will be scheduled where we present declarations and documentary evidence to support recognition of the trust interest. If the petition is uncontested, the court may grant the requested order after reviewing the filings. Once the court issues an order, we work with the county recorder and title company to record any corrective deeds and update title. These post-order steps ensure the trustee can manage, sell, or distribute the asset consistent with the trust terms without remaining title defects.
At a court hearing we present the assembled record, including the trust instrument, deeds, witness declarations, and any corroborating financial or escrow documents. The presentation focuses on establishing the settlor’s intent and addressing any competing claims or questions raised by interested parties. Clear organization of the evidence and concise explanations of how the documents support the trust claim make it easier for the court to reach the intended result. Our goal is to secure an order that aligns title with the trust based on the reliable factual record provided.
After the court signs an order recognizing the trust’s ownership interest, the order and any corrective deed must be recorded with the county recorder to clear public title records. We coordinate with title companies to confirm that the recorded documents meet their requirements for insuring title and may obtain updated title reports to confirm the matter is resolved. Finalizing these recording steps ensures the trustee can proceed with trust administration, sale, or refinancing without remaining uncertainty about who legally owns the property.
A Heggstad Petition is a request to the probate court to recognize that a particular asset should be treated as trust property despite the formal title remaining in the decedent’s name. It is used when the settlor intended the asset to be part of a living trust but the transfer was not completed or recorded before death. The petition presents evidence of intent, such as trust language, deeds, escrow records, or witness statements, and asks the court to enter an order recognizing the trust’s interest so the trustee can manage or distribute the asset under the trust. Filing such a petition is often preferable to opening full probate when the issue is limited to title discrepancies for specific assets. The petition focuses the court’s attention on the question of ownership for the asset at issue and can result in faster resolution and lower costs than a full probate estate, especially when documentary evidence and interested parties support the trust claim.
Timing varies depending on the complexity of the matters, whether the petition is contested, and local court schedules. In uncontested cases with clear documentation and cooperative beneficiaries, a Heggstad Petition can sometimes be resolved in a few weeks to a few months, accounting for preparation, filing, notice periods, and court review. When title companies and recorders are responsive, the post-order recording process moves more quickly and final title updates can occur shortly after the court signs an order. If the petition is contested or additional discovery is required, the process may extend significantly longer. Contested matters can involve depositions, additional declarations, and multiple hearings, which add time. Local probate calendars in San Diego County will also influence scheduling, so early assessment and timely documentation help streamline the timeline as much as possible.
Courts consider a range of evidence focused on the settlor’s intent to transfer the asset to the trust. Key items include the trust instrument and any schedules listing the asset, draft or recorded deeds, escrow and closing statements showing payment or intent to transfer, correspondence indicating the settlor’s directions, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s actions or statements. Financial records that show trust funds were used for acquisition can also support a petition. The court weighs the totality of the evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that the settlor intended the asset to be owned by the trust. Clear, contemporaneous documentation and corroborating witness statements strengthen the petition. The presence of conflicting claims or insufficient documentation can make the court’s decision more fact-intensive and may lead to additional proceedings.
A successful Heggstad Petition can avoid the need to administer that specific asset through formal probate, but it does not automatically eliminate probate for unrelated assets that remain in the decedent’s individual name. The petition targets particular items and, if granted, allows those assets to be treated as trust property for administration and distribution. If all significant assets are brought into the trust through petitions or proper title records, the need for a full probate administration can be reduced or avoided entirely. However, when other estate issues exist, such as creditors’ claims or assets not covered by the trust, probate may still be necessary. Each situation is fact-specific, and a comprehensive review of all assets and estate planning documents helps determine whether additional probate proceedings are required beyond the Heggstad remedy.
California probate rules require that the petitioner provide notice to interested parties, which typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs of the decedent, and any parties with a recorded interest in the property such as secured lenders. Proper notice allows those with a legal interest to object if they believe the petition is improper. Failing to identify and notify required parties can result in delays or procedural challenges that jeopardize the petition’s success. Coordinating notice early and documenting service helps avoid objections based on procedural grounds. In some cases, parties will stipulate to the petition after reviewing the documentation, which can avoid contested hearings and lead to quicker court approval. Counsel ensures that all required notifications comply with local probate rules to preserve the petition’s validity.
Yes, heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors can contest a Heggstad Petition if they dispute the settlor’s intent, the sufficiency of the evidence, or the petitioner’s standing. Contested matters can require additional factual development, such as depositions or further documentary discovery, and may proceed to an evidentiary hearing where the court evaluates conflicting testimony and records. Contested petitions tend to require more time and expense but are resolved by the court based on the presented evidence and applicable law. When a contest arises, clear documentation, credible witness declarations, and detailed factual narratives become especially important. Early assessment of potential objections and seeking stipulations where feasible can lessen the likelihood of prolonged disputes, while careful litigation preparation is essential if opposition cannot be resolved cooperatively.
If the court grants a Heggstad Petition, it will issue an order recognizing the trust’s interest in the specified asset, which enables the trustee to treat the asset as trust property. The trustee can then take steps to record corrective deeds or otherwise update public records to reflect trust ownership, transfer title, sell the property, or distribute proceeds consistent with the trust instructions. This judgment creates an official record that clarifies ownership and supports subsequent title insurance and escrow activities. After the order, coordination with the county recorder and title company ensures the order and any corrective documentation are properly recorded and accepted. Completing these recording steps finalizes the practical resolution so the trustee can proceed with management or distribution of the asset under the trust terms.
Alternatives to a Heggstad Petition include administering the asset through probate, seeking a deed correction or affidavit process where permissible, or pursuing a transfer by a duly appointed personal representative who can effectuate title changes as part of probate administration. In limited situations, parties may agree to an inter vivos correction or reformation if all necessary consents are obtained. The best option depends on the asset profile, the existence of disputes, and whether avoiding probate is a priority for the parties involved. Choosing the proper path requires careful evaluation of the facts, documentation, and potential consequences of each approach. Counsel can explain the trade-offs between a targeted petition, probate procedures, and contractual resolutions, helping clients select a route that preserves the settlor’s intentions while managing cost and timing considerations.
To prepare documents that support a Heggstad Petition, gather the trust instrument, any schedules or lists of assets, draft or recorded deeds, escrow and closing statements, bank records showing payments from trust accounts, and relevant correspondence. Affidavits or declarations from individuals involved in the transaction — such as escrow officers or attorneys who handled closing steps — can corroborate intent. Organize these materials chronologically and highlight connections between the trust and the asset to present a coherent narrative to the court. Early collection of documents and preservation of original records strengthens the petition. If documents are missing, declarations explaining the circumstances and testimony from credible witnesses can help bridge gaps. Counsel will advise on how best to compile and present the evidence to satisfy court expectations and support a favorable outcome.
Costs for a Heggstad Petition vary based on complexity, whether the matter is contested, and local court filing fees and publication requirements. In uncontested matters with clear documentation and cooperative parties, the overall expense tends to be lower because the process is narrower in scope than full probate. Costs include attorney fees for document review and petition drafting, court filing fees, service costs, and recording fees for any corrective deeds. Title company requirements can also add administrative expenses. When a matter is contested or involves multiple assets and complex title issues, costs increase due to discovery, additional filings, and possible hearings. Providing clear documentation early and seeking stipulations where possible helps control costs. During an initial consultation, counsel can provide an estimate after reviewing the facts and describing potential paths and likely fees associated with each.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas