A Heggstad petition can be an essential step for trustees, beneficiaries, or heirs who need court confirmation that a deceased person’s assets have been properly transferred to a trust. In Hidden Meadows and greater San Diego County, families turn to tailored estate planning actions when a trust has been funded informally or when assets still show the decedent as owner. This introduction explains the petition process, who may file, and why timing and clear documentation matter. We outline how local courts address Heggstad petitions and what typical outcomes clients can expect when they pursue this remedy in probate matters.
Understanding the Heggstad petition process helps families avoid delays and reduce the risk of assets being tied up in probate. This paragraph helps readers appreciate the practical reasons for pursuing a petition: to establish title to trust assets, to rely on court confirmation when informal funding occurred, and to ensure beneficiaries can access what was intended for them without unnecessary litigation. We also describe basic steps, including gathering documentation, preparing pleadings, and presenting evidence that the decedent intended trust ownership, all tailored to the local practices of San Diego County courts.
Filing a Heggstad petition provides legal clarity for assets that were meant to be in a trust but remained in the decedent’s name. The primary benefit is achieving a court order that recognizes the trust’s ownership, which avoids full probate administration and can speed distribution to beneficiaries. This court confirmation can also prevent future disputes among heirs and third parties by creating an official record of the trust’s intended transfers. For trustees and beneficiaries, a successful petition reduces administrative burdens and helps preserve the decedent’s estate plan as intended without prolonged court involvement.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning and trust administration services to families in San Diego County, combining practical legal knowledge with attentive client communication. Our approach is to evaluate each matter carefully to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the most efficient route to transfer assets into a trust, and then to prepare a concise, persuasive petition supported by relevant evidence. We aim to keep the process clear, to anticipate potential challenges, and to work toward solutions that honor the decedent’s plan while minimizing delay and expense for trustees and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used to establish that property belongs to a trust despite the asset remaining titled in the decedent’s name. The petition generally includes evidence such as the trust document, statements about the decedent’s intent, and proof of any informal steps taken to transfer assets. Courts will examine whether the transfer was intended to be into the trust and whether procedures were followed. This process can vary by county, so local filing practices and supporting documentation are important considerations when preparing a petition for a San Diego County court.
When pursuing a petition, petitioners must present coherent facts showing the decedent intended trust ownership and took actions consistent with that intent. Typical supporting items include the trust instrument, beneficiary designations, bank or title records, correspondence, and affidavits. The court looks for evidence that the asset should have become trust property and whether formal steps were impeded by oversight or other circumstances. Petitioners should be prepared to explain gaps in paperwork and provide witness statements that confirm the intent to fund the trust during the decedent’s lifetime.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property belongs to a trust despite being recorded in the decedent’s individual name. This remedy is based on showing the decedent’s clear intent and any actions taken to transfer the asset to the trust. Petitioners explain the factual background and submit supporting materials so the court can issue an order confirming trust ownership. The confirmation allows trustees to manage or distribute assets according to the trust without full probate proceedings, making it a practical tool for administering estates where funding was incomplete or documentation is imperfect.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically rely on a well-drafted statement of facts, the trust instrument, and corroborating evidence such as account statements or declarations from those familiar with the decedent’s intent. The process includes identifying the asset, tracing its ownership history, explaining why formal transfer did not occur, and showing that transfer to the trust was intended. Petitioners prepare pleadings that describe these facts, file them with the appropriate probate court, and may need to attend a hearing. Clear organization of records and direct witness statements often determine the petition’s outcome.
This section defines common terms used in Heggstad petitions to help clients understand filings, court responses, and outcomes. Terms covered include trust funding, trustee, beneficiary, decedent, probate court jurisdiction, and constructive transfer. Clear definitions provide a foundation for reviewing petition drafts and supporting documents. Learning these terms helps petitioners follow the court process, communicate effectively with legal counsel, and gather relevant evidence in a timely manner. Familiarity with this vocabulary reduces confusion during filings and courtroom proceedings.
Trust funding refers to the act of transferring legal ownership of assets into a trust so the trustee can manage or distribute them according to the trust’s terms. Funding can include retitling bank accounts, transferring deeds, assigning brokerage accounts, or naming the trust as beneficiary. Incomplete or informal funding occurs when the decedent intended transfer but did not complete paperwork. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be used to obtain court confirmation that the asset should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and surrounding circumstances.
A constructive trust is an equitable remedy the court imposes to prevent unjust enrichment by recognizing that a person holds property for the benefit of another. In the Heggstad context, a constructive trust may be argued to confirm that assets should be treated as trust property due to the decedent’s intent and actions. The court examines evidence demonstrating that the decedent meant the asset to belong to the trust. If successful, the outcome places the asset under the trust’s control so it can be managed or distributed according to the trust instrument.
A petition to determine trust ownership is a formal request to the probate court to declare that specified property belongs to a trust rather than the decedent’s probate estate. The petition outlines the basis for transfer, presents the trust document, and offers evidence of the decedent’s intent. If the court grants the petition, an order is issued confirming trust ownership which allows the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms. This remedy helps avoid full probate administration for assets that were meant to be owned by the trust.
Supporting evidence includes any documentation or witness statements that show the decedent intended assets to be held by the trust. This can include the trust agreement, bank statements, deeds, copies of checks, beneficiary designations, emails, and affidavits from those aware of the decedent’s intent. Courts weigh such evidence when deciding whether to grant a Heggstad petition. Well-organized support reduces the chance of contested hearings and can provide the factual basis needed for a clear court order transferring title to the trust.
When assets remain titled in a decedent’s name, there are different paths: full probate administration, summary procedures, or a Heggstad petition requesting trust recognition. Probate can be time consuming and costly, while summary proceedings may be limited by asset type or amount. A Heggstad petition offers a focused remedy to confirm trust ownership without full probate when the decedent intended transfer. The best option depends on the asset, documentation, potential creditor issues, and whether other parties may challenge the transfer. Local court practices also influence the choice between these paths.
A focused petition works well when a single asset or few items remain in the decedent’s name but clear evidence shows they were intended for the trust. Examples include a bank account or a vehicle title where the trust document and bank records indicate intent. Choosing a petition in these cases avoids the time and expense of full probate and enables the trustee to manage that asset promptly. Courts frequently grant petitions when documentation and witness statements align to show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust for those specific assets.
A petition is often suitable when ownership history is straightforward and interested parties agree or do not contest the transfer. If beneficiaries and potential claimants accept the facts and supporting documents, a court order confirming trust ownership can be obtained more efficiently. Cooperative circumstances reduce the need for extended discovery or contested hearings. When there is little dispute and strong documentation, the focused petition route minimizes delay and allows the trustee to proceed with administration under the trust’s terms.
Comprehensive legal assistance is advisable when multiple assets, varying ownership structures, or complex investment accounts are involved. In such cases, a coordinated plan that may include multiple petitions, title transfers, deed preparation, beneficiary coordination, and creditor considerations can prevent oversights. Handling numerous assets often requires detailed records review and careful sequencing to ensure all items are properly addressed. A broader approach reduces the risk of leaving assets subject to probate or creating conflicts among beneficiaries or third parties.
When beneficiaries or other parties dispute ownership or the decedent’s intent, comprehensive representation becomes important to prepare for hearings, discovery, and potential settlement discussions. Disputes can arise over ambiguous documents, conflicting beneficiary designations, or prior statements by the decedent. In contested situations, thorough preparation, strategic pleadings, and clear presentation of evidence help protect the trust’s intended distributions. A full-service plan can include negotiation and litigation readiness if court intervention becomes necessary to resolve disputes.
A comprehensive approach ensures that all assets are identified, properly transferred, and administered in accordance with the trust document. This holistic review can uncover overlooked items, correct mismatched beneficiary designations, and coordinate deeds and account retitling to prevent later disputes. Taking a broad view reduces the chance that assets will fall into probate or remain inaccessible to beneficiaries. It also provides a clear plan for handling creditor claims, tax considerations, and any necessary court filings in an organized manner.
Comprehensive handling often results in more predictable outcomes and smoother administration for trustees and beneficiaries. By addressing title issues, coordinating documents, and resolving potential conflicts early, trustees can act confidently and avoid piecemeal litigation later. A full review also helps prioritize actions, such as which accounts to retitle first and what notices are required. Taking these steps together saves time and reduces emotional strain for families during settlement, while preserving the decedent’s intent and ensuring efficient distribution under the trust.
When assets are addressed comprehensively, fewer items are left to be administered through probate, which reduces delays and court costs. Ensuring proper retitling, confirming trust ownership via petitions when necessary, and resolving title discrepancies proactively prevents assets from being tied up for extended periods. Trustees can distribute assets in line with the trust sooner and with less court oversight. For families, this leads to quicker access to funds needed for living expenses and other obligations while avoiding the burdensome timeline often associated with probate administration.
A comprehensive approach improves recordkeeping and reduces the likelihood of disputes among beneficiaries or third parties. By assembling clear documentation showing the decedent’s intent, preparing accurate inventories, and addressing title issues early, trustees create a transparent trail for distributions. This clarity diminishes confusion and provides persuasive support should questions arise. Good recordkeeping also helps in responding to creditor claims and tax inquiries, so the estate can be resolved more efficiently and with less emotional strain for those involved.
Collecting clear documentation is essential before filing a petition. This includes the trust document, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that shows the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Affidavits from family members or professionals who witnessed the decedent’s intent can strengthen the petition. Organize records chronologically and highlight items relevant to the asset at issue. Well-prepared evidence streamlines the court’s review and increases the likelihood of an efficient, favorable resolution without prolonged hearings or extra discovery.
Anticipate inquiries or objections by considering potential points of ambiguity and addressing them proactively within the petition. Clarify any inconsistent documentation and explain gaps in recordkeeping. Prepare witness statements that corroborate the decedent’s intent and prepare proposed findings for the court. If third parties might challenge the petition, gather additional proof and outline alternatives for resolving disputes amicably. Addressing foreseeable issues beforehand can shorten court time and help achieve a decisive order confirming trust ownership.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name and you need a court order to confirm trust ownership. This scenario often occurs due to oversight, timing, or incomplete retitling. A petition can preserve the estate plan by enabling trustees to manage and distribute assets without full probate. It is also useful when financial institutions require court confirmation before releasing funds to a trustee. Evaluating these circumstances early helps determine whether a petition is the most efficient remedy for your situation.
You should also consider a petition if beneficiaries require a clear legal path to receive assets or if delays in retitling could harm estate administration. A court confirmation creates a definitive record that the asset belongs to the trust, reducing the chance of future conflicts or claims by creditors or heirs. When clear documentation exists but formal transfer is incomplete, filing a petition is often the most direct and cost-effective way to honor the decedent’s intentions and allow trustees to proceed with distribution under the trust terms.
Typical circumstances include bank accounts, investment accounts, or real estate left in the decedent’s name despite the existence of a trust; informal transfers with missing paperwork; or administrative oversights that left assets untitled at death. A petition is also used when institutions refuse to recognize the trustee’s authority without court confirmation. Additionally, when the decedent’s intent is clear from documents and actions but formal steps were not completed, a petition provides a legal mechanism to effectuate the trust’s direction without full probate.
Financial accounts are often overlooked during trust funding, leaving them titled in the decedent’s individual name. When this happens, trustees may face difficulty accessing funds for estate needs or distribution. A Heggstad petition can request the court to confirm that such accounts were intended to belong to the trust, allowing banks or brokerage firms to recognize the trustee’s authority. Providing statements, beneficiary forms, and a clear explanation of the decedent’s intent helps the court issue the needed confirmation for account transfer or control.
Real property sometimes remains in the decedent’s name because deeds were not updated before death. In these cases, the trustee may seek a court order via a Heggstad petition to confirm that the property belongs to the trust. Supporting documents include the trust document, any draft deed or escrow instructions, and statements that show the decedent’s intent. A court determination can enable the trustee to retitle the property in the trust or proceed with sale or distribution according to the trust terms without full probate.
Assets accompanied by incomplete or conflicting paperwork present a common reason to file a petition. When account records, beneficiary designations, or deeds present gaps, the trustee can compile other evidence such as emails, affidavits, or financial records to demonstrate intended trust ownership. The court weighs all available proof to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. A well-prepared petition addresses inconsistencies directly and explains the decedent’s actions and intent to reduce the chance of a contested hearing.
If you are managing a trust administration in Hidden Meadows or elsewhere in San Diego County and encounter assets that were not formally transferred to a trust, we can help evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We assist trustees in gathering records, preparing a clear petition, and navigating local court requirements. Our goal is to provide pragmatic guidance so trustees can act confidently and proceed with asset administration. We also communicate with financial institutions and other parties to streamline the confirmation process and reduce administrative delays.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers focused estate planning and trust administration support for clients facing title or funding issues. We prioritize clear communication, careful document preparation, and court filings tailored to San Diego County practices. Our approach emphasizes minimizing delays and providing straightforward strategies to confirm trust ownership for affected assets. We work with trustees and beneficiaries to assemble the strongest possible record, coordinate with institutions, and prepare persuasive petitions that address likely questions from the court and interested parties.
When handling sensitive post-death matters, families benefit from responsive guidance to reduce stress and uncertainty. We focus on thorough preparation, anticipating information the court will need and organizing evidence for efficient review. Our goal is to help trustees proceed with administration while protecting the estate’s interests and honoring the decedent’s intentions. We explain options clearly so clients understand potential timelines and outcomes, and we seek to resolve matters in a straightforward manner whenever possible.
Clients receive practical assistance with filings, service of process, and courtroom procedures when necessary, along with support in communicating with banks, title companies, and other institutions. We place importance on maintaining an organized case file and preparing concise pleadings that present the facts effectively. For trustees who must manage distributions and creditor issues, this organized approach helps prevent unnecessary litigation and supports timely access to assets for beneficiaries in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust, the asset in question, and supporting documentation to determine whether a petition is appropriate. We then outline the needed evidence, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and handle filing with the probate court. If necessary, we arrange service on interested parties and respond to any court inquiries. We aim to keep clients informed at every step and to present the petition in a manner consistent with local court expectations, seeking a timely order confirming trust ownership.
The first step is a thorough review of the trust document, account records, deeds, and any correspondence that supports the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We identify gaps and collect witness statements or affidavits to corroborate intent when formal transfers are missing. This stage includes communicating with financial institutions to obtain transaction records and confirming whether retitling is necessary. A detailed evidence package increases the likelihood of a favorable court determination and streamlines the petition preparation.
We work with trustees to compile trust instruments, bank statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any drafts or notes that show intent. Gathering these records early helps determine the strongest path forward and prevents surprises later in the process. We also look for contemporaneous communications or signed instructions that illuminate the decedent’s actions. Organizing these materials chronologically and by asset type allows us to prepare a clear narrative for the court that explains why a petition is warranted.
When documentary evidence is incomplete, witness statements and affidavits can corroborate the decedent’s intent. We assist in drafting clear declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who observed the decedent’s actions or heard their expressed intentions. These statements must be factual and focus on specific events and communications. Properly prepared affidavits strengthen the petition and provide the court with firsthand accounts that complement documentary evidence, helping to establish the basis for an order recognizing trust ownership.
Once evidence is collected, we draft a focused petition that sets out the facts, attaches supporting documents, and requests an order confirming the asset as trust property. The petition follows local court formatting and filing requirements in San Diego County to prevent technical delays. We also prepare proposed orders and notices to interested parties. Filing is followed by ensuring proper service and monitoring any responses so we can address objections or provide additional information to the court promptly.
The statement of facts explains the asset’s history, the decedent’s intent, and why the court should confirm trust ownership. We draft this narrative to be clear, concise, and supported by attachments such as the trust instrument and account records. Emphasizing timelines and any actions taken to fund the trust helps the court understand the context. The statement is designed to anticipate common questions and present the strongest possible foundation for the requested order.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors is often required before the court will consider a petition. We prepare and serve notices in accordance with local rules, ensuring interested parties have the opportunity to respond. Timely and correct service prevents procedural challenges and helps avoid delays. We track response deadlines and are prepared to address any objections with additional evidence or argument to support the petition’s merits.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the petition, supporting evidence, and witness declarations to the judge, responding to questions and counterarguments as needed. In uncontested matters the court may grant the petition on the papers, but in other cases a short hearing clarifies factual issues. Once the court is satisfied, it enters an order confirming trust ownership, which enables trustees to manage or distribute the asset per the trust terms. We then assist with implementing the order, including title changes or financial institution communications.
We prepare a hearing strategy that highlights the strongest evidence and addresses potential questions from the court or objections from other parties. This includes organizing exhibits, preparing declarants to testify, and drafting concise legal points for presentation. Our goal is to present facts clearly and efficiently so the judge can render a decision that reflects the decedent’s intent. Attending the hearing ensures the petitioner is represented during any oral examination and that procedural needs are handled promptly.
After the court issues an order confirming trust ownership, we assist with the practical steps needed to effectuate the decision. This may include providing the order to financial institutions, preparing deeds to retitle real property, and updating account registrations. We also advise trustees on distribution under the trust and on addressing any remaining administrative tasks such as creditor notices and tax reporting. Ensuring proper implementation helps avoid future disputes and completes the asset’s transition to the trust.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain property belongs to a trust despite remaining in the decedent’s name. It is typically used when a trust exists and the decedent intended assets to pass to it, but formal retitling did not occur before death. The petition presents the trust document, factual background, and supporting exhibits that show the decedent’s intent and any attempts to transfer the asset. If granted, the court issues an order recognizing the trust’s ownership and authorizes the trustee to manage or distribute the property under the trust terms. This remedy is practical for singular assets or limited sets of property that would otherwise require probate. It can be faster and less costly than probate when the facts are straightforward. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence, and outcomes depend on documentation, witness statements, and local court practices. Preparing a clear petition and organizing supporting records helps the court decide efficiently whether trust ownership should be recognized.
In California, a trustee or a person interested in the estate may file a Heggstad petition to determine whether property belongs to a trust. Petitioners are typically individuals who have legal standing to request a court determination, such as those named in the trust or those responsible for administering the trust. Parties may include successor trustees, beneficiaries, or other persons affected by the asset’s ownership status. Filing requires demonstrating an interest in the property and readiness to provide the facts and evidence needed by the court to make a determination. Before filing, petitioners should ensure they understand any notice requirements to interested parties. Proper service and notification allow beneficiaries and heirs the opportunity to respond or object. When multiple parties have competing interests, the court will consider their positions. Engaging in careful pre-filing preparation and ensuring correct notice procedures can prevent procedural delays and help the court address the matter on its merits.
Supporting evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust document, account statements, deeds, copies of checks or transfer instructions, and any drafts or notes showing intent to transfer assets to the trust. Additional proof may be affidavits from witnesses, correspondence with financial institutions, or other contemporaneous records that show the decedent took steps consistent with funding the trust. The court looks for a clear link between the decedent’s intent and the asset in question, so compiling a thorough, organized evidence package is important for a successful petition. When documentary evidence has gaps, witness statements become more important. Affidavits should focus on specific, factual observations and avoid speculation. Courts weigh the totality of the evidence, so even if formal transfer paperwork is missing, a combination of documents and firsthand statements can support the petition. Preparing these materials carefully improves the chance of achieving a court order recognizing the trust’s ownership of the asset.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on local court schedules, the complexity of the evidence, and whether objections are filed. In uncontested cases with clear documentation, the process can move relatively quickly, sometimes resolved within a few months. When notice periods, additional discovery, or contested hearings are required, the timeline extends accordingly. Filing requirements and available hearing dates in San Diego County influence how soon a court will consider the matter, and petitioners should plan for potential procedural delays. To expedite the matter, petitioners should prepare thorough documentation and follow local filing rules precisely. Providing clear supporting exhibits and meeting notice requirements reduces the likelihood of continuances. Working proactively with institutions to obtain records and resolving minor issues in advance also shortens the process. Even with careful preparation, petitioners should expect a range of possible durations depending on court workload and case specifics.
A Heggstad petition can avoid the need to administer specific assets through full probate when the court grants an order recognizing those assets as trust property. However, not all assets or situations are suitable for a petition, and some matters may still require probate steps, especially when there are creditor claims or disputes that affect the overall estate. The petition addresses the ownership of the particular asset in question, but it does not automatically resolve all administration matters that might involve other assets or claims against the estate. When multiple assets or complex creditor issues exist, a broader probate administration may still be necessary. A careful initial evaluation determines whether the petition will sufficiently resolve the asset’s status or whether additional estate proceedings are required. Petitioners should be prepared for both outcomes and understand that a petition is one tool among several to carry out the decedent’s estate plan.
Financial institutions occasionally request additional court orders or documentation before releasing funds or recognizing a trustee’s authority, even after a Heggstad order. In many cases, presenting a certified court order is sufficient for banks and brokerage firms to retitle accounts or transfer assets. However, some institutions may have internal policies requiring additional steps or may require certified copies or specific forms to complete the transfer. Clear communication with the institution and providing the exact documentation they request often resolves these issues. If an institution refuses to comply, further filings or motions may be necessary to enforce the court’s order. Petitioners should anticipate contacting institutions early to determine their requirements and to avoid unexpected delays. Preparing certified copies of the order and assistance with institutional forms helps ensure the trustee can obtain control of the asset once the court has approved the petition.
If beneficiaries dispute a Heggstad petition, the court will consider their objections and may schedule a hearing to resolve factual issues. Disputes can involve questions about the decedent’s intent, the validity of documents, or competing claims to the asset. When objections arise, additional discovery and witness testimony may be required. The petitioning party must then present stronger proof to convince the court that the asset should be treated as trust property under the decedent’s plan. Disagreements sometimes lead to negotiations or settlement discussions that resolve issues without a contested hearing. Early communication and attempts to clarify ambiguities can reduce conflict. If litigation becomes necessary, focused preparation and clear evidence are central to achieving a favorable court determination that reflects the decedent’s intent for the asset at issue.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include formal probate administration, small estate affidavit procedures where applicable by statute, or settlement agreements among interested parties to retitle assets cooperatively. Probate may be appropriate for large or complicated estates, while simplified procedures may work for smaller amounts under statutory thresholds. Choosing an alternative depends on the asset type, the size of the estate, and whether interested parties can agree on the proper disposition of the property without court intervention. In some cases, contacting institutions directly to negotiate a solution or preparing corrective deeds can resolve the issue without a petition. However, when parties disagree or when institutions require a court order, a petition remains a reliable avenue to obtain definitive recognition of trust ownership. Evaluating all options helps determine the most efficient path for trustees and beneficiaries.
Costs vary depending on the complexity of the matter, the need for hearings, and the amount of documentary preparation required. Filing fees, service costs, and any fees charged by third parties for document retrieval are part of the expense. When matters are straightforward and uncontested, the overall cost tends to be lower. In contested cases with hearings and additional discovery, costs increase due to preparation time and court appearances. Petitioners should consider both court fees and professional time when budgeting for the process. We provide clear estimates after reviewing the file and explaining likely steps. Early preparation and concise evidence can reduce overall cost by limiting the need for contested hearings. Discussing anticipated timelines and potential obstacles helps trustees make informed decisions about proceeding with a petition and managing expenses while resolving ownership issues for trust assets.
To begin a Heggstad petition, start by gathering the trust document, account statements, deeds, and any other records showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Document any communications or actions that indicate the decedent’s plans and obtain witness contact information for affidavits if needed. Early organization of these materials helps determine whether a petition is appropriate and what supporting evidence will be necessary for court review. Next, consult with counsel or a legal advisor experienced in trust administration to review the documents and plan the filing. They can advise on local filing requirements, notice procedures, and evidence needed to prepare a persuasive petition. Proper initial preparation helps streamline the filing and increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome for trustees and beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas