A Heggstad petition can be an important tool when a trust fails to transfer title to assets during a trustee’s lifetime or when property must be reclassified to reflect trust ownership. Residents of Julian and surrounding San Diego County may encounter this situation after a trust maker’s death or when assets were not correctly deeded into the trust. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps clients understand when a Heggstad petition is appropriate, what documentation is needed, and what outcomes to expect. If you are dealing with untransferred property or need a court determination of trust ownership, legal guidance can help clarify options and next steps.
Navigating California’s probate and trust laws can be confusing, especially when paperwork does not match the trust maker’s intent. A Heggstad petition proceeds in court to establish that property was intended to be part of a trust despite appearing in the name of the decedent or another party. For Julian families, this process often happens alongside trust administration matters or after discovering assets that were overlooked. Clear documentation, witness testimony, and an organized presentation to the court are key. Our office can review deeds, trust language, and related documents to determine whether a Heggstad petition is likely to resolve title issues without prolonged litigation.
When a trust creator intends assets to pass through a trust but formal title has not been updated, the resulting confusion can delay distributions, complicate tax matters, and leave property effectively frozen. A Heggstad petition provides a judicial declaration that the asset belonged to the trust, enabling beneficiaries to clear title and proceed with administration. This process can prevent more extensive probate proceedings and reduce friction among heirs. For property owners and beneficiaries in Julian, obtaining a favorable court determination helps ensure that the trust’s direction is honored and that property transfers reflect the decedent’s wishes without unnecessary delay or expense.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across California, including those in San Diego County and Julian. Our approach focuses on careful document review, thorough case preparation, and clear communication with clients about legal options and likely outcomes. We handle Heggstad petitions alongside related trust matters such as trust administration, will matters, and deeds. Clients receive practical guidance on assembling records, preparing declarations, and working with local court procedures. If you need assistance determining whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, we can review the facts and advise on the most effective path forward for resolving title issues.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request made to a California court to declare that certain property was meant to be held in trust even though title is not reflected in the trust’s name. Typically used when a trust maker did not sign a deed or otherwise failed to complete a transfer, the petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership based on the trust document, declarations, and supporting evidence. The court evaluates documents, testimony, and the intent of the trust maker to determine whether title should be treated as held by the trust. This legal path helps beneficiaries and trustees clear title and proceed with trust administration without needing full probate procedures.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves gathering relevant documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, beneficiary designations, and possibly statements from witnesses or the trustee about the trust creator’s intent. The petition is typically filed in the probate court where the property is located, and procedures vary by county. The court may hold a hearing to consider the evidence and determine whether the property should be considered part of the trust. Resolving title issues through a Heggstad petition can simplify administration for beneficiaries and protect the trust’s intended distribution plan, while also ensuring compliance with California legal standards for trust and property transfer.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that property effectively belongs to a trust despite title appearing elsewhere. The petition often arises when deeds were not signed or recorded, or when clerical errors misrepresent ownership. The court considers the trust document, actions taken by the trust maker, and other evidence to assess intent. If the court finds that the property was intended for the trust, it will enter an order clarifying title. This order enables the trustee to manage or transfer the property under trust terms, allowing beneficiaries to receive assets as directed and preventing the need for a full probate estate administration for the mis-titled asset.
To support a Heggstad petition, it is important to collect the trust instrument, any drafts or amendments, deeds, beneficiary communications, and proof of actions consistent with trust ownership. Declarations from the trustee or other witnesses that explain the trust maker’s intent and actions can be persuasive. Legal filings require a clear explanation of the property, chain of title, and why the court should treat the asset as trust property. Understanding local court procedures and evidentiary standards helps streamline the process and increases the likelihood of a timely resolution that honors the trust maker’s intent and allows rightful administration of the asset.
The following glossary explains terms commonly used during a Heggstad petition and trust administration. Knowing these definitions helps clients understand filings, declarations, and court orders. Clear terminology makes it easier to gather the right documents and communicate effectively with the court. Terms covered include trustee, trust instrument, deed, chain of title, declaration, and court order. Familiarity with these concepts reduces surprises during the process and helps beneficiaries and trustees focus on the practical steps needed to obtain a judicial determination of trust ownership for mis-titled assets.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a person or entity holds property for the benefit of others according to the terms set by the trust maker. The trust instrument outlines duties of the trustee, identification of beneficiaries, and instructions for managing or distributing assets. Trusts are commonly used to avoid probate and to control how assets are handled during and after the trust maker’s life. When an asset intended for a trust is not formally transferred into the trust, a Heggstad petition can help a court determine that the asset should be treated as trust property based on the trust maker’s intent and supporting evidence.
A deed is the written instrument used to transfer title to real property from one party to another. Proper execution and recording of a deed are usually necessary to reflect current legal ownership. In Heggstad petition cases, the absence of a properly executed deed or a deed remaining in the decedent’s name can create uncertainty about whether the property belongs to the trust. The court will evaluate deeds, their recording status, and any related documents to determine whether the property was intended for the trust despite title discrepancies.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets in accordance with the trust instrument and for the beneficiaries’ benefit. Duties of a trustee include collecting assets, making distributions, and administering property per the trust’s terms. In Heggstad petition matters, the trustee often files the petition or provides testimony and declarations showing the trust maker’s intent and the steps taken to treat the property as trust-owned. The trustee’s accurate documentation and clear records are often pivotal to securing a favorable court ruling on trust ownership.
A declaration is a written statement under penalty of perjury used to present facts to the court. Declarations from the trustee, witnesses, or other parties can explain why an asset was intended to be part of a trust and provide context for missing deeds or administrative oversights. Courts rely on credible, well-supported declarations in Heggstad petition cases to assess intent and factual background. Clear and consistent declarations that reference documents, conversations, and actions taken by the trust maker strengthen the case for a judicial determination that the property should be treated as trust property.
When title issues arise, there are several potential legal pathways to resolve ownership, including Heggstad petitions, probate proceedings, quiet title actions, or corrective deed filings. A Heggstad petition specifically addresses circumstances where an asset was intended for a trust but not properly titled. Probate may be required when the decedent died intestate or when estate administration is necessary for other assets. Quiet title actions resolve competing claims but may not account for trust intent. Choosing the most appropriate option depends on the facts, the property type, and timing. Consultations and careful document review help determine whether a Heggstad petition offers the most efficient path to restore trust ownership and clear title.
Certain title problems stem from clerical oversights or recording mistakes that can be corrected with a relatively straightforward filing. For example, if a deed was prepared but not recorded, or a name was misspelled, corrective documentation coupled with supporting declarations may resolve the issue without a full court action. In some cases, a deed reformation or corrective deed can be sufficient when all parties agree on the intended transaction and evidence supports that conclusion. Working with counsel to identify narrow remedies can save time and expense compared to broader litigation paths.
When all interested parties, including beneficiaries and potential claimants, agree on the status of an asset and are willing to sign corrective documents, a coordinated approach can often resolve title matters without court intervention. This cooperative path relies on clear documentation and the willingness of all parties to sign necessary deeds or acknowledgements. Counsel can prepare the appropriate instruments and ensure they are properly executed and recorded. However, when disagreement exists or documentary evidence is ambiguous, a Heggstad petition may provide a definitive judicial resolution.
If records are unclear, deeds are missing, or multiple documents point in different directions, a court declaration under a Heggstad petition can clarify ownership. When documentary evidence does not conclusively demonstrate that an asset was intended for a trust, the court evaluates the totality of the evidence, including declarations and witness testimony. Comprehensive legal assistance helps gather and present this evidence effectively, prepare pleadings, and anticipate potential opposition. A well-prepared petition increases the chances that the court will enter an order aligning title with the trust maker’s intent and allowing proper administration of the asset.
When beneficiaries or other parties contest ownership, informal remedies may not be viable and a formal court process becomes necessary. A Heggstad petition brings the matter before a judge who can make a binding determination based on evidence and testimony. Handling contested matters often requires strategic preparation, careful examination of title history, and effective presentation in court. Legal representation helps ensure petitions comply with procedural requirements, that relevant evidence is gathered and organized, and that the court receives a clear explanation of why the asset should be treated as trust property.
A comprehensive approach to resolving title issues brings the benefit of a clear, enforceable court order that resolves uncertainty about ownership. This protects beneficiaries and trustees by creating a public record that the asset is trust property, allowing for confident management, transfer, or sale under trust terms. Court resolution can also address competing claims and prevent future disputes. For Julian residents, achieving a judicial declaration can simplify ongoing administration and reduce the risk of later challenges by documenting the trust maker’s intent and providing legal finality to the title status.
Pursuing a thorough legal path includes preparation of persuasive declarations, collection of corroborating documents, and compliance with local court rules, each of which strengthens the case. While some matters can be resolved informally, a comprehensive strategy offers certainty and reduces the likelihood of prolonged litigation later. It also ensures that the legal remedy chosen aligns with the property’s value, the complexity of the title defect, and the interests of beneficiaries. Having a complete record and court order can make future transactions smoother and provide peace of mind that the trust maker’s intentions are legally recognized.
One of the main benefits of a comprehensive approach is obtaining finality through a court order that clarifies title. With a judicial determination, trustees and beneficiaries can move forward with management or transfer of the asset without lingering doubts about ownership. This clarity aids in transactions, lending, and tax reporting, and reduces the risk of later challenges. The public record established by the court order removes ambiguity and helps ensure that the trust maker’s instructions are honored in a way that supports efficient administration and reduces future legal complications for those handling the estate or trust.
Resolving title through the court can prevent future disputes by providing an authoritative determination that binds parties under court procedures. A clear ruling reduces the chance of competing claims and offers a durable resolution that can be relied upon in subsequent transactions. For families in Julian, this means beneficiaries can proceed with distributions or sales with confidence that ownership issues have been judicially settled. Taking a comprehensive approach early reduces the likelihood of costly litigation later and helps ensure that the trust maker’s wishes are consistently followed by future holders of the property.
Start by collecting all documents that might show the trust maker’s intent, including the trust instrument, deeds, beneficiary designations, correspondence, and any drafts or amendments. Also locate closing statements, mortgage records, and any written communications that reference the property. Organized records make it easier to prepare declarations and present a clear case to the court. Keeping digital copies and a simple chronological index of documents will streamline the petition process and reduce delays when filings are required in the local probate court.
Each county has specific rules and timelines for probate and trust-related petitions. Learn the local filing requirements, necessary forms, and typical hearing schedules for San Diego County or the jurisdiction where the property is located. Timely filing and adherence to procedural rules reduce the risk of continuances or technical denials. Preparing the petition with attention to local practice and required attachments increases the likelihood that the court will accept the matter for hearing and will be able to evaluate the evidence on a clear record.
If you discover that a property intended for a trust remains in an individual’s name after the trust maker’s death, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to align title with the trust document. Common triggers include missing or unrecorded deeds, changes in property description, or unclear estate planning steps. Without court clarity, beneficiaries can face delays in accessing proceeds or transferring property. A petition provides a formal process to evaluate intent and correct title, helping to carry out the trust maker’s direction and enabling trustees to administer property in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Beyond immediate administration concerns, unresolved title issues can complicate tax filings, sales transactions, and refinancing. Lenders and buyers typically require clear title, and a court order confirming trust ownership eliminates obstacles to selling or encumbering property. For families in Julian, obtaining a judicial declaration can open practical options for property disposition and reduce the administrative burden on trustees. Pursuing a Heggstad petition is often a prudent step to produce a public, enforceable record that supports continued management or transfer of the affected asset under the trust’s instructions.
Situations that often trigger Heggstad petitions include discovering real property still in the decedent’s name, transfers that lacked necessary signatures, outdated deed recordings, or assets omitted from trust funding. Sometimes a trust maker attempted to fund a trust but failed to complete the necessary legal steps. Other times, a change in property description or an oversight during a move can leave title unclear. When these issues arise, a Heggstad petition provides a structured way to present evidence of intent and achieve a judicial acknowledgement that the property should be administered as part of the trust.
A deed that was never recorded—or that cannot be found—can create significant uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries. Even if the parties intended the property to be part of a trust, the absence of a recorded deed may prevent transfer or sale. A Heggstad petition allows the court to examine the available evidence and determine whether the property should be treated as trust-owned. Pursuing this remedy can clear title and allow the trustee to proceed with distribution or sale under the trust’s terms, reducing administrative delays and uncertainty for heirs.
When property remains in the name of the deceased rather than the trust, beneficiaries may encounter obstacles to managing or selling the asset. Because the title does not reflect the trust, third parties may be reluctant to deal with the property until the ownership issue is resolved. A petition asking the court to recognize the trust’s ownership can provide the necessary legal clarity. Once a court order is obtained, it becomes easier for trustees to complete transactions and for beneficiaries to receive their rightful distributions without prolonged administrative barriers.
Occasionally, competing documents or prior transfers create ambiguity about ownership. For example, an older deed or inconsistent beneficiary designations might conflict with the trust’s terms. In such cases, the court must weigh the various records and determine which reflects the trust maker’s intent. A Heggstad petition frames these issues for judicial review, allowing the court to evaluate all evidence and issue a ruling that clarifies present ownership. Resolving conflicts through the petition process reduces uncertainty and helps ensure that administration follows the trust’s intended plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Julian residents and families across San Diego County with Heggstad petitions and related trust matters. We help assemble documents, prepare petitions, and present the case to the probate court so that title can be clarified and trust administration can proceed. Whether you are a trustee struggling with an unrecorded deed or a beneficiary seeking a clear path to distribution, we provide practical guidance tailored to local court practice. Reach out to discuss the specific facts of your situation and learn about potential next steps for resolving title issues efficiently and properly.
Clients rely on our firm for careful document review and practical legal advice tailored to trust administration needs. We focus on gathering the evidence courts expect to see in Heggstad matters, drafting clear petitions and declarations, and guiding trustees and beneficiaries through local probate procedures. Our team emphasizes clear communication, realistic expectations about timelines, and strategies aimed at resolving title issues in the most efficient manner available under California law. From initial review to court presentation, we work to present a complete record that supports a court determination aligning title with the trust maker’s intent.
When disputes or complications arise, we help clients evaluate alternatives and pursue the most appropriate legal remedy. That might include seeking a Heggstad petition, coordinating corrective deeds, or addressing other trust administration tasks as needed. We aim to reduce client stress by outlining required documents, anticipated steps, and likely outcomes. Throughout the process, our office keeps clients informed of procedural requirements and potential timelines for court action, enabling trustees to make informed decisions about managing or transferring affected property.
We encourage early action when title discrepancies are discovered so that necessary filings can be prepared with care and evidence collected while documentation is accessible. Prompt, methodical preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable resolution and helps avoid delays that can complicate estate or trust administration. If you are dealing with property that may not have been properly funded into a trust, contact our office to discuss how a Heggstad petition or other remedial steps may help restore clarity and enable distribution according to the trust maker’s wishes.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document and all related property records to assess whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then gather supporting evidence, prepare declarations, and draft the petition and required attachments for filing in the appropriate probate court. We explain expected timelines, potential responses from other parties, and courtroom procedures. If necessary, we represent trustees at hearings and work to secure an order that clarifies title. Throughout, we maintain communication with clients to ensure they understand each step and the best options available to resolve title issues.
An initial assessment focuses on the trust instrument, deeds, and any records showing attempts to transfer property to the trust. We identify gaps or conflicts in documentation and determine whether the facts fit Heggstad petition criteria. This phase often involves requesting copies of recorded documents, reviewing closing statements, and interviewing trustees or witnesses who can speak to the trust maker’s intentions. A thorough assessment helps determine the most efficient legal path and the evidence needed to support a petition or alternative remedy.
Collecting all relevant documents is a foundational step. This includes the trust agreement, any amendments, deeds, escrow or closing records, beneficiary designations, and correspondence showing the trust maker’s intent. We compile and organize these materials to create a clear narrative that supports the petition. Properly indexed documents and a timeline of events make it easier to prepare declarations and exhibit lists for the court. Early organization reduces delays and strengthens the factual presentation required for judicial review.
After gathering materials, we assess the strength of available evidence and identify any missing pieces that could be obtained through further investigation. This may include witness statements, affidavits, or locating unrecorded documentation. We advise clients on how to secure additional proof and explain how the court will weigh various types of evidence. Addressing these gaps before filing improves the petition’s clarity and helps avoid unnecessary continuances or additional discovery once the case is before a judge.
Once the evidence is compiled, we draft the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations, ensuring compliance with local probate court rules. The filing explains the property at issue, the basis for treating it as trust property, and the requested order. Attachments include copies of the trust instrument, relevant deeds, and exhibits that demonstrate the trust maker’s intent. We also prepare required notices for interested parties and coordinate service of process. Accurate preparation at this stage sets the foundation for the court’s consideration and the potential hearing.
Declarations should be clear, factual, and supported by documentary exhibits. We prepare declarations from the trustee and other witnesses that explain pertinent events, actions, and the trust maker’s expressed intentions. Exhibits such as copies of deeds and correspondence are labeled and organized to support each factual assertion. Well-prepared declarations and exhibits help the court understand the context and the evidentiary basis for the requested order without undue confusion or ambiguity.
After drafting, we file the petition in the appropriate probate court and ensure service on all required parties, such as beneficiaries and heirs. Proper notice allows interested persons the opportunity to respond, object, or attend the hearing. Compliance with procedural and notice requirements reduces the risk of technical challenges and helps the court proceed to a timely hearing. We monitor deadlines, respond to any responses or objections, and keep clients informed of any developments affecting the case timeline.
If a hearing is required, we present the facts and declarations to the court, explain the evidentiary basis for treating the asset as trust property, and address any opposing assertions. The judge evaluates the totality of the evidence and issues an order if satisfied the asset was intended for the trust. The order clarifies title and allows the trustee to manage or transfer the property according to trust terms. We follow up to ensure that the court’s order is properly recorded or otherwise implemented to complete the title correction process.
At the hearing, the court considers declarations, documents, and any testimony offered in support of the petition. Clear presentation and organized exhibits help the judge assess the trust maker’s intent and the chain of title. We focus on factual clarity and avoid unnecessary disputes, aiming to demonstrate why the court should recognize the asset as trust-owned. Effective hearing preparation includes anticipating potential objections and ensuring that the record supports the requested order to clear title and facilitate trust administration.
After a favorable order, the next step is to implement the court’s decision by recording documents or taking other actions to reflect the new title status. This may include submitting the order to the county recorder, updating trust inventories, and preparing any necessary transfer documents. Ensuring that the order is properly recorded creates a public record that facilitates sales, refinancing, or distributions. We assist clients with paperwork following the court’s ruling so that the practical effects of the judgment are realized and the asset is properly administered under the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing in California seeking a judicial declaration that certain property was intended to be held in trust even though title may not reflect that intention. It is commonly used when deeds were not properly signed, recorded, or when asset transfers were otherwise incomplete. The petition asks the probate court to examine the trust instrument, related documents, and declarations to determine whether the property should be administered as trust property. This procedure helps clarify title so trustees and beneficiaries can proceed with administration or transfer under the trust terms. This remedy is particularly appropriate when documentary evidence and factual circumstances indicate the trust maker intended the property to pass through the trust, but formal title does not. The court evaluates documents, testimony, and the totality of evidence to decide if the property should be treated as trust-owned. If successful, the resulting order creates a public record that clarifies ownership and facilitates subsequent transactions or distributions consistent with the trust.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts and the local court’s calendar. Preparation time includes gathering the trust instrument, deeds, and supporting declarations, which can take several weeks. Once filed, the court’s scheduling of hearings and any required service periods can extend the process. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and no opposition, the matter may be resolved relatively quickly, while contested or document-intensive matters can take longer. Local procedures and any objections from interested parties also affect the timeline. When additional evidence or discovery is needed, the process can be extended. Working proactively to assemble a complete record before filing helps reduce delays and positions the matter for more timely resolution by the court.
Key evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument and any amendments, deeds or title records, closing documents, and correspondence indicating the trust maker’s intentions. Declarations from the trustee or witnesses who observed the trust maker’s actions or heard expressions of intent are also important. Documents that show consistent treatment of the asset as part of the trust strengthen the case and make it easier for the court to find in favor of the petition. Organized exhibits that clearly tie factual assertions to documentary proof are highly persuasive. Providing a timeline of relevant events and labeling exhibits so the court can easily follow the factual narrative reduces confusion. When evidence is thorough and coherent, the court is better positioned to issue an order that aligns title with the trust maker’s intent.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or creditors may oppose a Heggstad petition if they believe the property should not be treated as trust-owned or if they assert competing claims. Opposition can lead to contested hearings where the court evaluates competing evidence. When objections arise, responding with well-documented declarations, corroborating exhibits, and a clear factual presentation is essential. Proper notice and service also ensure that the court resolves disputes between interested parties rather than allowing ambiguity to persist. Contested matters may extend the time and resources required to obtain a ruling. In such instances, mediation or negotiated resolution may be possible before a full hearing. Legal representation helps ensure that responses to objections are timely and that the petition is supported by a compelling factual record for the court to consider.
A successful Heggstad petition can eliminate the need to open a full probate for the specific asset at issue by securing a court order that treats the property as trust-owned. However, whether probate is avoided entirely depends on the broader estate plan and whether other assets require probate administration. If other assets remain outside the trust and require probate, those matters may proceed separately. A Heggstad order specifically addresses title problems and helps trustees administer the trust asset without further probate steps for that property. Even when probate is not needed for the particular asset, the petition must be filed in the appropriate probate court and follow court procedures. The order resulting from the petition becomes part of the public record and serves as the legal basis for treating the property as held by the trust, facilitating transactions and distributions under the trust terms.
Costs associated with a Heggstad petition include court filing fees, service costs, and possible fees for obtaining copies of records or hiring professionals to prepare documents. Attorney fees vary depending on the complexity of the matter, the amount of evidence to compile, and whether the petition is contested. Preparing declarations, exhibits, and responding to objections can increase the time required and the associated fees. Being proactive about documents and witness statements can help control costs by reducing the need for extended investigation or discovery. If the matter proceeds to hearing, additional costs may include time spent preparing for the hearing and attendance at court. Discussing anticipated costs and a likely budget during an initial consultation helps clients plan and evaluate options for resolving title issues effectively and economically.
Begin by locating and copying the trust document, deeds, and any records related to the property, such as closing statements or mortgage documents. Make a list of potential witnesses who can attest to the trust maker’s intention. Early steps also include identifying interested parties and beneficiaries who may need notice. This preparatory work gives a clear picture of whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and what evidence will be required to support it in court. After the initial document collection, consult with counsel to evaluate the facts and determine the best course of action. Counsel can advise on the necessary declarations, required exhibits, and local filing procedures. Addressing issues early and organizing records will increase efficiency and help ensure that the petition, if filed, is supported by a coherent evidentiary record.
A Heggstad petition is most commonly used for real property title issues, although similar principles may apply to other asset types if title records and trust intent conflict. The court examines the nature of the asset and the evidence supporting trust ownership to determine the appropriate remedy. For certain personal property or accounts, corrective administrative steps or alternate remedies may be available without a formal petition. Evaluating each asset type and the applicable records is important to decide whether a Heggstad petition is the proper legal path. When dealing with non-real estate assets, other procedures, such as contacting financial institutions to update beneficiary designations or producing affidavits for account transfers, may be effective. Counsel can identify which assets require court intervention and which can be addressed through administrative corrections or direct cooperation with third parties.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the order will outline the reasons for denial and whether further action is possible. In some circumstances, additional evidence or a different legal approach may address the court’s concerns. For example, pursuing probate, quiet title actions, or corrective deeds might be alternatives depending on the facts. Understanding the basis for denial helps determine the next steps and whether further legal proceedings are advisable to achieve the desired title outcome. Following a denial, parties may consider options such as obtaining additional supporting declarations, seeking settlement with interested parties, or evaluating other legal remedies. Consultation with counsel about the court’s reasoning and potential alternative strategies helps establish a plan to resolve the ownership issue and move forward with appropriate administration.
Yes, a court order from a successful Heggstad petition can be used to clear title, which in turn enables sales, refinancing, or other transactions that require clear ownership. Once the order is recorded with the county recorder or otherwise implemented according to local procedures, lenders and buyers have evidence of the trust’s ownership. This facilitates practical steps such as listing the property, completing escrow, or obtaining financing that would otherwise be impeded by ambiguous title. It is important to ensure the court’s order is properly recorded and reflected in title documents so that third parties recognize the corrected ownership. Counsel assists with recording the order and taking any subsequent steps necessary to make the court’s ruling effective for real estate transactions and to support trustee actions under the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas