A Heggstad petition addresses situations where a decedent transferred assets into a trust but some property was not properly titled into that trust before their death. Residents of Ramona and San Diego County may encounter this issue during estate settlement, and understanding the petition process helps avoid prolonged probate proceedings. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with filing and prosecuting Heggstad petitions when appropriate, working to confirm that the decedent intended certain assets to be governed by their trust. This introduction explains the purpose and typical outcomes of pursuing a Heggstad petition in California.
Filing a Heggstad petition can streamline distribution of assets that were meant to be in a trust but were not correctly transferred before death. The petition asks the court to confirm that those assets are trust property, which can simplify administration and reduce disputes among heirs. In Ramona, local practice and court expectations shape how petitions are prepared and argued. Our approach focuses on documenting intent, supporting evidence, and clear legal arguments so the court can recognize trust ownership when appropriate, saving time and limiting costs compared with full probate litigation.
A Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate and preserve the intent the decedent expressed when creating their trust. When assets were intended to be in a living trust but remained titled in the decedent’s name, the petition asks the court to recognize those assets as trust property. This can save family members from lengthy court proceedings and reduce administration expenses. For individuals in Ramona and the surrounding areas, obtaining a judicial declaration that property belongs to a trust clarifies ownership, supports seamless transfers to named beneficiaries, and protects the orderly distribution of the decedent’s estate in accordance with their estate planning documents.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across California, with practical experience handling petitions and trust-related court matters. Our team in San Jose serves families throughout the state, including those in Ramona, by preparing petitions, assembling supporting evidence, and advocating in local probate courts. We prioritize clear communication and careful document preparation to help trustees and beneficiaries navigate complex trust issues. Our goal is to facilitate fair outcomes, reduce delays, and support clients through each stage of the judicial process while honoring the decedent’s documented intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a legal petition filed in probate court to establish that certain assets were intended to be part of a decedent’s trust despite not being formally transferred before death. The process typically involves assembling evidence such as trust documents, wills that pour over assets into trust, beneficiary designations, deeds, and other communications indicating intent. The petition requests a judicial determination and often includes declarations from witnesses, copies of custody records, and transaction histories that support trust ownership. Understanding the burden of proof and gathering documentation early increases the likelihood that the court will recognize the trust’s interest in the property.
When preparing a Heggstad petition in Ramona or elsewhere in California, it is important to show consistent indication of the decedent’s intent that the asset be controlled by the trust. Courts examine the totality of circumstances, including the trust document, any deed or title changes, beneficiary forms, and surrounding declarations or actions. Some petitions resolve with court orders confirming trust ownership, while others can prompt negotiations among heirs or beneficiaries. Timely filing and thorough documentation reduce uncertainty and help trustees move forward with administering trust assets according to the decedent’s plan.
A Heggstad petition seeks a court order declaring that property that remained in the decedent’s name at death was intended to be trust property and therefore passes under the trust terms. The petition often arises when a trustmaker executed a trust but failed to retitle assets, or when the trust contains pour-over provisions meant to capture assets at death. Filing the petition asks the probate court to examine statements, documents, and actions demonstrating intent and to direct transfer or administration consistent with the trust. The relief streamlines disposition, avoiding a full probate if the court recognizes the trust’s claim.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on clear evidence of intent, such as the trust document, corresponding pour-over wills, correspondence about the trust, and actions taken by the decedent that align with trust funding. Additional elements include accurate asset descriptions, chain-of-title documents, and declarations from those familiar with the decedent’s planning. The process includes drafting the petition, filing in the appropriate probate court, serving interested parties, and providing supporting declarations and exhibits. Courts evaluate credibility and documentary support, and a well-organized filing reduces the likelihood of disputes and helps the judge arrive at a prompt determination.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petitions helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the legal process and prepare necessary documentation. Relevant terms include trust, trustee, decedent, pour-over will, probate, title, chain of title, declaration, and judicial determination. Knowing what each of these means clarifies expectations at every step, whether assembling deeds, preparing declarations, or responding to court inquiries. A clear grasp of these concepts assists in gathering evidence that supports a petition and helps avoid procedural missteps that can delay resolution in the local probate court in San Diego County or elsewhere in California.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a trustmaker transfers legal title to assets to be managed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries, according to written trust terms. In estate planning, living trusts are used to manage assets during a person’s life and provide instructions for distribution at death. A Heggstad petition often asks a court to declare that certain assets belong to a trust even if formal retitling did not occur. Understanding the trust document, its terms, and who serves as trustee is central to establishing whether assets should pass under the trust or through probate proceedings.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets remaining in a decedent’s individual name into a revocable living trust upon death. When a pour-over will exists alongside a trust, it shows an intent that assets should ultimately be administered under the trust. This can be significant evidence when pursuing a Heggstad petition, since the existence of a pour-over will and consistent estate planning documents can demonstrate the decedent’s overall plan to use the trust as the primary vehicle for asset distribution.
Probate is the court-supervised process for settling a decedent’s estate, validating wills, appointing administrators, and distributing assets under the will or state law if no will exists. A Heggstad petition can narrow the scope of probate by confirming that certain assets belong to a trust and therefore should bypass probate. Recognizing trust ownership through a court declaration reduces the assets that must pass through the probate estate, potentially saving time and costs, and allowing trustees to administer trust assets as directed by the trust instrument.
Chain of title refers to the documentation that records ownership history of an asset, such as deeds, titles, and transfer records, which can show whether property was retained in a decedent’s name or transferred into a trust. Establishing a clean chain of title helps a Heggstad petition by tracing ownership and demonstrating the decedent’s actions and intent. Supporting documents may include recorded deeds, vehicle titles, financial account records, and trustee or beneficiary designations that align with the trust’s purpose and demonstrate the decedent’s intent to have assets managed and distributed under the trust terms.
When confronting assets that were meant to be in a trust but were not retitled, interested parties can consider a Heggstad petition, full probate administration, or negotiated settlement among beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition seeks judicial declaration that the assets belong to the trust, often avoiding broader probate. Full probate can be more time-consuming and public, while negotiated resolutions may save time but require agreement among all parties. Evaluating local court practices in San Diego County, the strength of documentary evidence, and the willingness of beneficiaries to cooperate informs the best path forward for settling the decedent’s estate efficiently and with reduced conflict.
A limited petition is often appropriate when documents and actions clearly indicate that the decedent intended a particular asset to belong to the trust. Examples include a trust document naming the asset or a pour-over will that aligns with the trust terms. When evidence is straightforward, filing a targeted Heggstad petition can produce a court order that confirms trust ownership without opening a broader probate case. This approach is often faster, less intrusive, and helps trustees distribute the asset according to the trust’s provisions more quickly than a full estate administration.
If beneficiaries and potential heirs acknowledge the decedent’s intent and agree that the asset should transfer to the trust, a focused petition or stipulation to the court can resolve the matter efficiently. Cooperation reduces litigation risk and lowers costs associated with lengthy contested proceedings. In such cases, the court may approve a petition based on submitted evidence and agreements without contested hearings. This collaborative route helps protect family relationships and allows trustees to complete administration tasks promptly while ensuring compliance with California probate rules and local court procedures.
Comprehensive legal involvement may be needed when multiple parties assert competing claims or when the chain of title is unclear or disputed. Complex assets, joint ownership issues, or missing documentation can lead to disagreements that require litigation, forensic title work, or negotiated settlements. In such situations, preparing a robust petition with extensive declarations, legal analysis, and possibly arranging evidentiary hearings is essential to protect the trust’s asserted interests and ensure a lawful resolution under California probate rules and local court practice.
When assets are high in value or when beneficiaries contest trust ownership, a comprehensive legal approach helps secure a favorable procedural posture and evidence trail. This includes detailed investigation, preparing for contested hearings, coordinating with financial institutions or title companies, and negotiating where appropriate. Thorough preparation increases the chance the court will issue a clear ruling regarding trust ownership and prevents future challenges. The goal is to protect the decedent’s intent, preserve estate value, and ensure distribution aligns with the trust’s directives while observing California law and local court expectations.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition reduces the risk of lingering disputes, ensures careful documentation of the decedent’s intent, and builds a clear record for the probate court to evaluate. This thoroughness can be particularly valuable when dealing with complex title histories, multiple beneficiaries, or assets that require additional verification. By assembling a complete factual narrative and legal argument, trustees and beneficiaries are better positioned to obtain a definitive court ruling, which helps streamline administration and reduces the likelihood of future litigation over the same assets in Ramona or elsewhere in California.
Comprehensive preparation can also improve negotiation leverage and clarity among interested parties, leading to stipulations or settlements that resolve matters without contested hearings. It ensures that trustees comply with statutory duties and court procedures, reducing the risk of procedural defects that might undermine a petition. Ultimately, a careful, well-documented petition can preserve estate resources by avoiding protracted disputes, while facilitating prompt distribution consistent with the decedent’s estate plan and protecting beneficiary interests under California law.
A fully developed petition clarifies ownership and reduces the chance that unresolved title issues will lead to future litigation. Courts often prefer clear records that show consistent actions and intent by the decedent. When a petition includes comprehensive documentary evidence, declarations, and legal analysis, judges can more readily conclude that specific assets were intended to be trust property. This clarity benefits trustees and beneficiaries by reducing uncertainty, enabling efficient distribution, and minimizing the administrative burden associated with prolonged court involvement in the estate settlement process.
A detailed approach often leads to faster judicial resolution and helps preserve estate value by avoiding protracted disputes that consume time and resources. Presenting a clear case to the court, supported by documents and witness declarations, can shorten hearings and limit appeals. This efficiency reduces fees, administrative costs, and the emotional toll on family members, allowing trustees to focus on carrying out the trustmaker’s intent. For families in Ramona and surrounding areas, this means a smoother transition of assets and a more predictable timetable for distribution under the trust terms.
Collecting all relevant documents early can make or break a Heggstad petition. Start by assembling the trust instrument, any pour-over will, deeds, titles, beneficiary designations, account statements, and correspondence that reference the trust or asset transfers. Identify witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent and locate any contemporaneous records that show efforts to fund the trust. Early organization of documents and witness statements helps present a coherent case to the court, reduces delays, and supports a smoother path to obtaining a judicial declaration that aligns with the decedent’s plan.
Open, documented communication with heirs and beneficiaries can reduce conflict and facilitate agreements that streamline court proceedings. Informing interested parties about the petition, sharing relevant documents when appropriate, and offering opportunities for discussion can lead to stipulations that eliminate contested hearings. Keeping communication respectful and professional helps preserve relationships and may reduce costs. When disagreements arise, clear records of outreach and attempts to resolve issues can also support a trustee’s position in court and demonstrate good faith in pursuing the decedent’s intended plan.
Consider a Heggstad petition if assets that should be in a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name, creating obstacles for trustees who need to administer trust assets. The petition can effectuate the decedent’s plan, reduce exposure to formal probate for specific assets, and help beneficiaries receive property according to the trust’s terms. When documentation shows the trustmaker’s intention to fund the trust, a petition can bring clarity, minimize public probate proceedings, and reduce the administrative burden on families working through estate settlement in Ramona and the broader San Diego County area.
Another reason to pursue this petition is to avoid disputes over ownership that delay distribution and increase costs. By seeking a judicial declaration that identifies trust property, trustees can obtain court authority to manage and transfer assets without needing full probate for those items. This is especially helpful where assets are few in number or when the decedent’s overall plan centers on a revocable living trust. A properly supported petition strengthens the trustee’s ability to act promptly and in accordance with the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
Common scenarios include real estate that was never retitled into the trust, bank or brokerage accounts left in a decedent’s name, or personal property that was intended for trust administration but remained under individual title. Other circumstances arise when the decedent executed a trust and a pour-over will yet failed to complete transfers, when beneficiary designations conflict with trust terms, or when records needed to show intent are incomplete. These situations often prompt trustees or beneficiaries to seek a court declaration to align asset ownership with the decedent’s estate plan.
Real property is a frequent subject of Heggstad petitions when deeds were not recorded or retitled into the trust before the owner’s death. Because courts rely on recorded documents and supporting evidence, petitions involving real estate typically include deeds, escrow documents, and any correspondence or statements demonstrating intent to fund the trust. When successful, the petition can result in a court order that directs the county recorder to reflect trust ownership or otherwise allows trustees to manage and distribute the property under trust terms, simplifying the ownership transition to named beneficiaries.
Financial accounts or brokerage holdings that remain titled in the decedent’s name at death can complicate trust administration and prompt petitions to establish trust ownership. Statements, beneficiary designations, and account opening documents that show intent to include assets in the trust are important evidence. When a Heggstad petition verifies that these assets were intended to be trust property, trustees can access funds for trust administration or distribute assets according to the trust, avoiding the need for full probate administration of those accounts and reducing delays in settling the estate.
Personal property, vehicles, or other miscellaneous assets that were meant to be included in a living trust but were never formally transferred can also be addressed through a Heggstad petition. Documentation such as purchase receipts, titles, or contemporaneous notes can help demonstrate the decedent’s intent. Resolving ownership through the petition allows trustees to handle or distribute tangible assets in accordance with the trust, preventing disputes and ensuring that the decedent’s wishes are followed even when paperwork was incomplete at the time of death.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides support for Heggstad petitions and trust administration matters to residents of Ramona and throughout San Diego County. We assist in gathering documentation, drafting petitions, and coordinating filings with the local probate court. By offering clear guidance on procedures and evidence requirements, our team helps trustees navigate the steps necessary to seek a judicial declaration that certain assets belong to a trust. Call 408-528-2827 for more information about how we can help you organize a petition and protect the decedent’s intentions.
Selecting a law office to prepare and file a Heggstad petition involves trust in careful document preparation, court filing experience, and a track record of handling trust administration matters. Our firm offers comprehensive assistance in organizing records, drafting persuasive petitions, and managing communication with interested parties. We focus on presenting a coherent legal and factual picture to the probate court so that the trustee can obtain a clear judicial determination where appropriate. Our goal is to support clients through the process with thorough preparation and attentive service.
We help trustees and beneficiaries by reviewing trust instruments, assembling relevant title and account documents, and preparing declarations that reflect the decedent’s planning and intent. Our approach involves identifying the strongest evidence, anticipating common objections, and addressing procedural requirements to present a petition that meets the court’s expectations. We coordinate filings and notices to interested parties, aiming for efficient resolution that minimizes delay and cost while preserving the decedent’s plan for distribution under the trust.
Clients benefit from clear communication throughout the filing and hearing process, including updates on timelines, likely outcomes, and any opportunities for settlement or stipulation among parties. We strive to reduce uncertainty for trustees so they can proceed with administration and asset distribution in an orderly manner. If you need assistance with a Heggstad petition in Ramona or elsewhere in San Diego County, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to discuss the specifics of your situation and the best path forward based on the available facts and documents.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust, related estate planning documents, and the assets at issue to determine suitability for a Heggstad petition. We then identify and collect supporting documentation, prepare declarations and exhibits, draft the petition, and file in the appropriate probate court. We serve notices to interested parties and respond to any concerns or objections that arise. If necessary, we represent clients at hearings to explain evidence and seek a court order confirming trust ownership, working to resolve matters efficiently and respectfully in accordance with California probate rules.
The first step focuses on gathering foundational materials that support the petition, including the trust document, pour-over will, deeds, account statements, and correspondence that reflect the decedent’s intent. We analyze these materials to determine the strength of the claim that the asset belongs to the trust, identify any conflicting records, and note potential witnesses who can provide declarations. Early identification of missing pieces and an organized evidence plan helps ensure the petition presents a cohesive narrative for the probate court to evaluate.
We carefully examine the trust instrument alongside any pour-over will and related estate planning documents to understand the trustmaker’s intent and the terms under which property should be administered. This review helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy and what specific assets should be included. Clarifying the trust provisions and aligning them with the assets in question enables us to draft a petition that accurately reflects the decedent’s plan and presents strong evidence of intended trust ownership to the court.
We compile deeds, account statements, titles, and any transaction records that demonstrate the history of ownership for the asset in question. Identifying gaps in the chain of title and locating contemporaneous evidence of the decedent’s actions or statements strengthens the petition. We also gather witness contact information and other supporting documentation that can be turned into declarations for court. A comprehensive record helps the court assess whether the asset should be treated as trust property despite not having been formally retitled before death.
Once the documentation is assembled, we draft a petition that presents the legal basis and factual support for recognizing the asset as trust property. The petition includes clear factual statements, itemized exhibits, and declarations from witnesses where available. We review local filing requirements, prepare required notices for interested parties, and submit the petition to the appropriate probate court. Properly formatted filings and timely service reduce procedural risk and set the stage for a productive court review or hearing on the petition.
We prepare detailed declarations from trustees, witnesses, or other relevant parties to explain the decedent’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the asset’s ownership. Exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and relevant correspondence are organized and referenced within the petition. Strong, well-organized exhibits and clear declarations make it easier for the judge to review the case and reach a decision. Our careful presentation aims to minimize the chance of objections based on form or missing documentation.
After finalizing the petition and supporting documents, we file with the local probate court and arrange for proper service on heirs, beneficiaries, and any affected parties. Complying with statutory notice requirements and local court rules is essential to avoid delays or procedural objections. We then monitor the matter for any responses, scheduling needs, or proposed stipulations. Keeping interested parties informed and complying with procedural timelines helps move the petition forward efficiently.
The court may decide the petition based on the submitted documents or may schedule a hearing where parties can present argument and evidence. We prepare for hearings by assembling witnesses, briefing legal points, and organizing exhibits for presentation. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property and directing appropriate transfer or management steps. If objections are raised, we work to resolve them through negotiation or litigation while keeping the trustee’s duties and the decedent’s intent at the forefront of advocacy.
Preparing for court involves rehearsing testimony, anticipating factual questions, and ensuring exhibits are admissible and clearly labeled. We prepare trustees and witnesses to provide concise, factual testimony that supports the petition and clarifies the decedent’s intent. Anticipating common lines of inquiry and preparing responses helps the court efficiently consider the petition without unnecessary delay. Clear presentation at hearing increases the likelihood of a definitive court ruling that aligns asset ownership with the expressed terms of the trust.
If the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we assist with steps needed to effectuate the transfer, such as recording corrective deeds, updating account registrations, or presenting the order to financial institutions. These actions finalise the trust’s control over the asset and allow trustees to administer or distribute it according to the trust’s terms. We ensure that post-order tasks comply with county recording practices and financial institution requirements to complete the administration efficiently and in accordance with California law.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare certain property as belonging to a trust even though the asset remained in the decedent’s name at death. It arises when a trustmaker clearly intended assets to be governed by a living trust but did not complete formal retitling, leaving title records that do not reflect trust ownership. The petition presents evidence of intent and related documents to support the trust’s claim and seeks a court order aligning ownership with the decedent’s plan. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence, including the trust document, pour-over will, deeds, account statements, and witness declarations. The goal of the petition is to create a judicial record that allows trustees to manage or transfer the asset under the trust terms without subjecting that asset to a full probate administration, reducing delays and administrative costs when successful.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition can vary depending on local court schedules, the completeness of documentation, and whether any interested parties oppose the petition. In San Diego County, straightforward petitions with clear supporting evidence may be decided in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested matters or those requiring additional fact development can take longer. Early preparation and compliance with local filing requirements help keep the process moving efficiently. Factors that extend timing include the need for additional discovery, contested hearings, or difficulties serving interested parties. Promptly gathering documents, notifying beneficiaries, and preparing strong declarations reduces the likelihood of procedural delays and fosters a clearer path to a timely court decision and subsequent trust administration tasks.
The most helpful evidence includes the trust document itself, any pour-over will, deeds or title records, account statements, and correspondence that shows the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s statements or actions are also valuable. Together, these materials create a consistent narrative that the asset was intended to be handled by the trust. Additional supporting items such as escrow records, transaction histories, or communications with financial institutions can reinforce the claim. A well-documented chain of title and contemporaneous records showing steps taken to fund the trust increase the petition’s persuasiveness and assist the court in reaching a determination favoring recognition of trust ownership.
A successful Heggstad petition can limit the need for probate for the specific assets at issue by securing a court declaration that those assets are trust property. However, not all assets in an estate will necessarily be addressed by a single petition, and other assets may still require probate if they are not covered by a trust or other beneficiary designations. The petition focuses on correcting ownership for particular items that were intended to be in the trust. Even when a petition succeeds, trustees should verify whether any remaining estate assets require probate and ensure compliance with procedural steps. The petition’s order helps trustees administer trust assets but does not automatically resolve unrelated probate matters that fall outside the petition’s scope.
Yes, beneficiaries or heirs can contest a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should be part of the probate estate or if they dispute the decedent’s intent. Contests may involve disputes over the trustmaker’s intent, the authenticity of documents, or competing title claims. When objections arise, the court may schedule hearings to consider evidence and testimony from both sides before making a determination. Resolving contests may involve negotiation, admission of additional evidence, or litigation. Preparing a thorough petition with strong documentary support and witness declarations reduces the likelihood of successful challenges and increases the chance of a clear ruling that aligns asset ownership with the trust’s provisions.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the matter, local court fees, and whether the petition is contested. Fees include court filing charges and potential costs for obtaining copies or certified documents, recording deeds, or hiring title search services. If litigation or extended court hearings are necessary, attorney costs and related expenses can increase accordingly. Early organization of evidence and clear communication among interested parties can reduce costs by avoiding contested hearings. Where possible, settling disputes through stipulations or agreements can also minimize expenditures and expedite resolution, preserving more of the estate’s value for beneficiaries.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets remaining in an individual’s name into a previously created living trust at death. The presence of a pour-over will often supports a Heggstad petition by showing that the decedent’s overall estate plan intended for assets to be administered under the trust, even if formal retitling was not completed. This helps demonstrate consistent intent across estate planning documents. While a pour-over will is persuasive evidence, it is just one part of the total evidence considered by the court. Combining a pour-over will with deeds, account statements, and witness declarations strengthens a petition and helps the court conclude that the asset should be treated as trust property.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition and issues an order recognizing assets as trust property, trustees typically take steps to effectuate the order. This can include recording a corrective deed with the county recorder, updating account registrations with banks or brokerage firms, and presenting the court order to third parties to change title or release assets to the trustee for administration under the trust. Trustees should follow the court’s directives carefully and comply with recording and institutional requirements to complete transfers. Properly implementing the order ensures that assets are managed and distributed according to the trust’s terms and minimizes the risk of future disputes over ownership.
A trustee’s authority to act on assets before a petition is resolved depends on the circumstances and potential liability concerns. In many cases, trustees should be cautious and avoid unilateral transfers or distributions until the court clarifies ownership, because acting prematurely could expose the trustee to claims from heirs or creditors. Trustees should document efforts to protect assets and seek court guidance where appropriate. When immediate action is necessary to preserve asset value, filing a petition along with requests for provisional relief or court guidance may allow trustees to take limited steps under judicial oversight. Consulting about appropriate interim measures ensures trustees meet their obligations while protecting trust assets during the petition process.
To begin the process in Ramona, start by collecting the trust document, any will, deeds, account statements, and related correspondence that indicate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Identify potential witnesses and gather title records or transaction histories that show ownership details. Early organization of these materials makes it easier to assess whether a Heggstad petition is warranted and what evidence will be needed. Next, consult with counsel familiar with trust administration and local probate procedures to evaluate the strength of the claim and prepare a petition if appropriate. Timely filing, proper notice to interested parties, and clear documentation of intent increase the likelihood of a successful petition and efficient resolution under California probate practice.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas