A Heggstad petition can be an important tool for family members and trustees when assets transferred to a trust were not properly titled before a grantor passed away. In Rancho San Diego and across San Diego County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with clear, practical steps to pursue a Heggstad petition to recognize asset transfers to a trust and avoid unnecessary probate. We explain the legal standards, courtroom expectations, and likely timelines so you can make informed decisions. If you are managing a trust or representing a successor trustee, understanding how a Heggstad petition functions helps protect beneficiaries and preserve the trust’s intent.
Many families facing estate administration issues find the Heggstad petition process unfamiliar and emotionally taxing. A petition may be necessary when a decedent’s assets were intended to be held by a trust but remain in the decedent’s name, creating a potential need for court recognition. This guide outlines common scenarios, benefits of addressing titular defects promptly, and how petition proceedings typically unfold in San Diego courts. If you are dealing with bank accounts, real property, retirement accounts, or other assets that should have been titled to a trust, a Heggstad petition can offer a path to formalize those transfers with judicial approval and provide clarity for distribution.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent full probate administration, reduce administrative expenses, and allow trust distributions to proceed according to the decedent’s wishes. Courts review evidence showing that assets were intended to be trust property, and a successful petition clarifies title and authority for trustees to manage or distribute those assets. In Rancho San Diego, pursuing this remedy can save time and costs compared to a formal probate, help preserve family relationships by reducing confusion, and provide a court order that banks and title companies will accept. Timely action and careful documentation are important to maximize the benefits of this approach.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with estate planning and trust administration matters across California, including Heggstad petitions in Rancho San Diego. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical solutions, and close attention to documentation that courts require for trust recognition. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to gather evidence, prepare pleadings, and present a persuasive case to the court when assets intended for a trust remain incorrectly titled. Our goal is to resolve matters efficiently while protecting client interests and ensuring that the decedent’s intent for asset distribution is honored.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the deceased person intended certain assets to be held in a trust, even though those assets were not retitled before death. Courts evaluate documents, witness statements, and surrounding circumstances to determine intent and whether the assets should be treated as trust property. For trustees and beneficiaries in Rancho San Diego, the petition can be a practical remedy when administrative transfers were not completed or when institutions require a judicial determination to release funds or transfer property. Understanding the evidentiary burden and typical court procedures helps petitioners prepare a stronger case.
Preparation for a Heggstad petition involves collecting clear proof showing that the decedent intended assets to be part of the trust. This may include the trust document, drafts, correspondence, trustee actions, beneficiary expectations, and any steps the decedent took to transfer assets. The court balances the evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. Working through this process carefully avoids missed deadlines and reduces the risk of disputes. Parties should be prepared for potential objections and have a plan to address competing claims while aiming to preserve trust administration timelines.
A Heggstad petition seeks an order stating that certain assets are properly part of a trust despite not being formally retitled before a person’s death. The action allows trustees to manage and distribute those assets under the trust’s terms instead of subjecting them to probate rules. Courts consider the trust document and corroborating evidence to determine the decedent’s intent and whether the asset was meant to be trust property. For beneficiaries in Rancho San Diego, a favorable ruling can streamline distribution, provide clarity to financial institutions or title companies, and reduce the administrative burden on the family and trustee.
Essential elements for a successful Heggstad petition include documentation of the trust, evidence the decedent intended the asset to be included, demonstrable actions taken toward transfer, and a clear chain of custody for supporting records. The process usually begins with a petition filed in probate court, followed by notice to interested parties, potential discovery, and a hearing. Courts review testimony, documents, and any objections before issuing an order. Effective preparation, careful evidence gathering, and timely notice to beneficiaries and lienholders help reduce delays and increase the likelihood of a smooth resolution.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petition proceedings helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate the process. Terms such as trust, trustee, grantor, probate, petition, order, and titling are central to interpreting the legal steps and documents involved. Clear definitions and examples give laypersons a better grasp of what courts look for when deciding whether assets should be treated as trust property. This glossary clarifies those terms and offers practical explanations so parties can collect the right records and prepare informed statements for court consideration.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a grantor transfers property to a fiduciary trustee who holds and manages assets for the benefit of designated beneficiaries under the terms of a written instrument. Trusts commonly specify distribution rules, successor trustees, and powers for management and investment. In Heggstad petition contexts, courts evaluate whether specific assets were intended to be part of the trust despite being improperly titled at the time of the grantor’s death. Demonstrating that assets were meant to be trust assets is central to a petition confirming trust ownership and enabling the trustee to act.
A petition is a formal request filed with the probate court asking for a legal determination, such as recognition that assets belong to a trust. The petition sets forth the facts, legal basis, proposed order, and identification of interested parties who must be notified. In a Heggstad petition, the filing party seeks judicial recognition that asset transfers intended for a trust should be honored without full probate administration. The petition initiates court review, triggers required notices, and establishes the framework for adjudicating title or distribution disputes.
Probate is the court-supervised process of administering a decedent’s estate when assets are titled in the decedent’s name and distribution must follow statute rather than trust directions. The probate process can involve appointment of a personal representative, creditor notices, inheritance determinations, and court oversight. A successful Heggstad petition may reduce or avoid probate for specific assets by establishing that those assets belong to a trust, allowing distribution according to the trust document instead of through probate administration. Avoiding unnecessary probate often conserves time and resources for families.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing and distributing trust assets according to the trust instrument and fiduciary duties. Duties include preserving trust property, exercising prudent management, and acting in beneficiaries’ best interests while following the trust’s terms. When a Heggstad petition is filed, a trustee typically seeks a court order recognizing trust ownership over mis-titled assets so the trustee can continue administration without the obstacles banks or title companies might create. Clear orders help trustees fulfill distribution instructions without further delay.
When titled property remains in a decedent’s name, families generally consider alternatives such as informal transfer procedures, full probate, or a Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership. Heggstad petitions aim specifically to minimize court involvement while avoiding the complexity and cost of full probate for assets that should belong to a trust. Probates may be necessary for assets without clear trust intent or where creditor claims require formal administration. Choosing the right path depends on asset type, the strength of documentary evidence, potential creditor issues, and whether interested parties contest the transfers.
A limited approach is often sufficient when the decedent left clear written evidence of intent that certain assets be placed in a trust and the necessary supporting documents are available. Examples include a signed trust instrument, correspondence discussing the transfer, or actions showing the decedent intended the trustee to control the asset. In those circumstances, a Heggstad petition may be an efficient mechanism to obtain a court order confirming the asset’s trust status so the trustee can access and distribute it according to trust terms without full probate.
A limited remedy may work well when beneficiaries and other interested parties agree on the asset’s treatment and there are no substantial creditor claims or competing ownership claims. When parties are cooperative and the facts supporting transfer to the trust are straightforward, a Heggstad petition can resolve title issues with limited court supervision. This approach saves time and reduces legal costs, while providing the formal judicial confirmation often required by banks, brokers, or title companies to release funds or transfer property into the trustee’s control.
Comprehensive legal involvement becomes necessary when the decedent’s intent is disputed, multiple parties claim ownership, or there are competing creditor assertions. In such cases, additional investigation, extended discovery, and detailed court presentations may be required to establish trust ownership. A contested proceeding can involve witness testimony, deposition transcripts, and thorough documentary analysis to persuade the court. Preparing for a contested matter early helps preserve evidence, anticipate objections, and develop a strategy that addresses potential hurdles posed by other claimants.
When high-value real property, business interests, or complex financial instruments are involved, a more thorough approach can be warranted to ensure protective steps are taken before title changes or distributions occur. Formal litigation or court-supervised procedures may be necessary to clear title, resolve liens, or address tax considerations. A comprehensive review of asset histories, beneficiary rights, and possible creditor exposure reduces the risk of future challenges and helps trustees implement durable solutions that maintain the value and integrity of the trust estate.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad petitions and related trust administration issues can produce durable court orders, reduce the likelihood of later disputes, and clarify the trustee’s authority to act. While more involved than informal transfers, careful preparation and legal oversight protect beneficiary interests and ensure compliance with court requirements, title company rules, and bank procedures. For families in Rancho San Diego, obtaining a clear ruling can prevent future litigation, provide peace of mind, and expedite the lawful distribution of assets according to the trust’s provisions.
Additionally, a thorough process helps identify and resolve potential issues such as creditor claims, competing beneficiary assertions, and inconsistencies in documentation. Addressing these matters proactively allows trustees to distribute assets with confidence and reduces the risk of later challenges that could lead to costly litigation. Courts often prefer well-documented petitions that present a full factual record, which can lead to smoother acceptance by financial institutions and title companies, and ultimately more predictable outcomes for trust administration.
One key benefit of a comprehensive approach is obtaining a court order that clearly recognizes the trust’s ownership of disputed assets and provides a reliable basis for banks, brokers, and title companies to release funds or transfer property. Durable court orders reduce the risk of future disputes by creating an authoritative record that documents the decedent’s intent and the legal basis for trust control. This clarity helps trustees perform their duties without repeated obstacles and gives beneficiaries assurance that distributions follow the decedent’s plan.
By thoroughly documenting facts, providing notice to interested parties, and addressing potential creditor or beneficiary claims during the petition process, a comprehensive approach reduces the likelihood of subsequent litigation. Courts are more likely to accept well-supported petitions, which can prevent new disputes arising after distributions have been made. Taking these protective steps in Rancho San Diego helps trustees avoid costly, time-consuming contests and supports a more efficient and dignified conclusion to trust administration for families.
Start collecting the trust instrument, any drafts, correspondence, beneficiary lists, bank statements, deeds, and other documents that indicate the decedent’s intent well before filing a petition. Early documentation preserves critical evidence and helps identify witnesses who can attest to intent. In Rancho San Diego, courts weigh tangible proof and contemporaneous actions heavily, so assembling a complete packet of records and statements will improve the quality of a petition. Good preparation reduces delays, clarifies facts for the court, and strengthens credibility when financial institutions request proof of authority.
Anticipate common objections such as claims of competing ownership, creditor disputes, or assertions that the decedent did not intend the asset for the trust. Prepare documentation and witness statements that respond to these concerns, including any steps the decedent took toward transferring the asset or prior practice showing trust administration. Thoughtful preparation helps reduce surprises at hearings and increases the chance the court will issue an order recognizing trust ownership promptly. Considering objections in advance also supports negotiation and potential settlement when appropriate.
Families and trustees often consider a Heggstad petition to minimize the cost, time, and publicity associated with full probate when assets were intended to be part of a trust but are mis-titled. A petition can provide a legal pathway to recognize those assets as trust property so the trustee can manage and distribute them according to the trust. This helps protect beneficiaries’ interests, reduce administrative burdens, and provide formal documentation that financial institutions and title companies will accept when transferring funds or recording deeds.
Another reason to seek a Heggstad petition is to address uncertainty over asset ownership in a way that preserves family relationships and reduces the risk of future litigation. A court order resolving title issues gives trustees confidence to act and beneficiaries assurance that distributions will follow the decedent’s intentions. For many Rancho San Diego families, pursuing a petition is a sensible step to finalize trust administration while limiting the scope of court involvement to what is necessary to confirm ownership and allow lawful transfers.
Typical circumstances include recently executed trusts where the decedent failed to retitle bank accounts or real property, assets transferred by affidavit but not completed, or records indicating intent to fund a trust without formal transfers. Other situations arise when institutions demand a court order to accept trustee instructions or when there are conflicting informal statements about ownership. Recognizing these scenarios early and taking corrective steps helps trustees prepare an effective petition and avoid unnecessary probate for assets that should be governed by the trust.
When bank or brokerage accounts remain in the decedent’s individual name, institutions often require clear legal authority to transfer funds to a trust or to distribute account proceeds. A Heggstad petition can establish that the account was intended to belong to the trust, enabling the trustee to access funds for estate administration and distribution. Collecting account statements, beneficiary designations, and related correspondence showing an effort to fund the trust can support the petition and persuade financial institutions to accept the resulting court order as sufficient proof of trust ownership.
Real property is frequently left in a decedent’s name even when a trust was intended to control distribution. In such cases, a Heggstad petition can be filed to recognize that the decedent intended the real property to be part of the trust and to obtain a court order allowing title companies to record transfers consistent with the trust. Supporting documents such as the deed, trust instrument, tax records, and testimony about the decedent’s intent strengthen the petition and help clear title so the trustee can manage or distribute the property.
Assets such as vehicles, small business interests, or older accounts may have incomplete or ambiguous documentation, creating obstacles for trustees trying to administer the trust. When paper trails are imperfect, a Heggstad petition provides a mechanism to present the totality of circumstances showing the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Courts review the available evidence, witness statements, and any corroborating actions to determine whether to recognize the asset as trust property and permit its management or distribution under trust terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide local assistance for Heggstad petitions and trust administration issues for clients in the Rancho San Diego area. We help trustees and beneficiaries identify assets that may require court recognition, gather supporting documentation, prepare the necessary probate filings, and represent client interests in court proceedings when needed. Our goal is to achieve practical and timely resolutions so trustees can access trust assets and carry out distributions. If you face title problems or unclear asset ownership, we can guide you through the Heggstad petition process and required notices.
Choosing the right legal partner matters when pursuing a Heggstad petition because documentation, timing, and court presentation affect outcomes. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focus on clear communication and practical, methodical preparation of petitions to present persuasive factual records to probate courts. We help clients identify necessary documents, coordinate witness statements, and meet statutory notice requirements so proceedings move forward efficiently and with minimized disruption to family dynamics and trust administration.
Our practice emphasizes sensitivity to family circumstances while pursuing legally sound solutions for trust recognition and asset transfer issues. We work closely with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions to reduce friction and provide court-ready documentation that institutions are more likely to accept. Timely notice, careful evidence collection, and thoughtful planning are central to our approach, which aims to streamline administration and protect the trust’s purpose for distributing assets to beneficiaries in accordance with the decedent’s wishes.
We also assist with ancillary matters that commonly arise during Heggstad proceedings, including coordinating with title companies, resolving lien or creditor questions, and preparing petitions or declarations tailored to the court’s expectations. Our goal is to obtain clear orders that facilitate estate administration, reduce administrative costs, and prevent future disputes. For trustees and families in Rancho San Diego, that practical, comprehensive support helps secure orderly trust distributions and finalizes the estate affairs with dignity and clarity.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust instrument and the specific asset issues at hand, followed by a plan to collect supporting documents, provide required notices, and prepare the petition. We communicate anticipated timelines and court requirements so trustees understand each step. If objections arise, we respond with targeted discovery and factual support. Our aim is to obtain a judicial recognition order while minimizing delay and cost. We keep clients informed throughout the process and coordinate with institutions to implement the court’s order smoothly.
The first step is a thorough assessment of the trust, the assets at issue, and the available documentation showing intent to transfer to the trust. We identify witnesses, locate deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any prior retitling attempts. This inventory helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and what evidence will be most persuasive at a hearing. Early identification of potential obstacles allows us to develop strategies to address them before filing and to ensure proper statutory notice for interested parties.
We scrutinize the trust instrument, any amendments, and related estate planning documents to confirm the trust’s terms and intended beneficiaries. We also examine deeds, account records, and transaction histories to establish whether assets were treated as trust property during the decedent’s lifetime. This review identifies inconsistencies, documents that corroborate the decedent’s intent, and any necessary follow-up, such as securing missing records from banks or title companies. A careful document review strengthens the petition and prepares us for questions that may arise during court proceedings.
Witness statements can be important evidence for a Heggstad petition. We identify individuals who can attest to the decedent’s intent, record relevant conversations, or describe actions the decedent took to fund the trust. Preparing detailed declarations that recount relevant facts and circumstances helps the court understand the context behind any defective titling. We assist witnesses in preparing clear, credible statements and ensure declarations meet evidentiary standards so the petition presents a coherent narrative supporting the requested relief.
After gathering evidence and preparing witness declarations, we draft the Heggstad petition, proposed order, and required notices for interested parties. Filings are tailored to local probate court procedures and include supporting exhibits and declarations that demonstrate the decedent’s intent and the legal basis for recognition. Filing is followed by formal service of notices and an opportunity for interested parties to respond. Clear, well-supported petitions increase the likelihood of a smooth resolution and reduce the chances of objections leading to protracted hearings.
Drafting the petition involves presenting a concise narrative supported by documentary exhibits, such as the trust instrument, deeds, bank statements, and witness declarations. We organize exhibits to make it easy for the court to follow the decedent’s actions and intent. The proposed order clearly identifies the relief sought and how title should be recorded or funds transferred. Properly prepared exhibits and declarations reduce confusion, limit the scope of disputes, and provide a clear roadmap for the court to grant the requested recognition.
After filing, required notices must be served on beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors according to statute and local rules. We manage service and track responses so any objections are addressed promptly. If interested parties do not object, the court may sign the proposed order with minimal hearing time. If objections are filed, we work through discovery and prepare responses that address factual disputes. Ensuring accurate notice and timely response handling protects the integrity of the proceeding and helps avoid procedural setbacks.
The final step typically involves a court hearing where the judge reviews the petition, evidence, and any objections before issuing an order. If the court grants the petition, the order directs how title should be treated and provides the trustee the authority to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. We work with title companies, banks, and other institutions to implement the order, record deeds as needed, and transfer assets to the trustee. Proper follow-through ensures the court’s determination results in practical resolution for beneficiaries.
At the hearing, the court considers the petition, witness declarations, and any documentary exhibits to determine whether the asset should be recognized as trust property. We present organized evidence and a clear legal argument that demonstrates the decedent’s intent and the basis for judicial recognition. Anticipating the court’s questions and addressing potential objections proactively enhances the chance of receiving a favorable ruling that trustees can rely on when interacting with financial institutions and title companies to effectuate transfers.
Once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, we assist in implementing the judgment, including recording deeds, presenting the order to banks or brokers, and ensuring assets are retitled to the trustee or otherwise handled according to the order. We coordinate with institutions to confirm acceptance of the court’s determination and to resolve any remaining administrative steps. Thorough implementation ensures the trust’s distribution plan is followed and closes the loop on trust administration matters.
A Heggstad petition is a probate filing that asks the court to recognize that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust even though they were not formally retitled in the trust’s name before the grantor’s death. The petition presents documentary evidence and witness declarations that demonstrate the decedent’s intent and actions taken toward funding the trust. When a court is persuaded by the totality of the evidence, it issues an order recognizing trust ownership so a trustee can manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms rather than through probate. This remedy is commonly used when bank accounts, deeds, or other assets remain in the decedent’s name due to oversight, administrative delay, or incomplete transfers. The Heggstad petition offers a narrower alternative to full probate for specific assets, provided sufficient evidence supports the claim that the decedent intended those assets to be trust property. It can streamline administration and reduce costs when implemented with careful preparation and proper notice to interested parties.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s schedule, the complexity of the facts, and whether objections are filed. In uncontested situations with strong documentary support and cooperative interested parties, the matter can resolve in a matter of weeks to a few months, allowing trustees to secure access to assets more quickly than formal probate might. Filing, service of notice, and court availability all affect the timeline, and local San Diego probate calendars influence hearing dates. If disputes or creditor claims arise, the process can extend significantly due to required discovery, additional declarations, or contested hearings. Preparing a comprehensive petition with solid exhibits and clear witness statements helps shorten the timeline and reduces the likelihood of continuing litigation that would delay final resolution and implementation of the court’s order.
Evidence for a Heggstad petition often includes the trust instrument, drafts or amendments, written correspondence showing intent, deeds, account statements indicating the intended beneficiary or payee, and testimony from witnesses who can corroborate the decedent’s actions and statements. Bank records showing attempts to retitle accounts, canceled checks, or prior transfers are valuable. The court assesses whether the totality of the evidence demonstrates a clear intent to include the asset in the trust. Witness declarations that recount specific conversations, the decedent’s planning habits, or the context of transfers add persuasive weight. Gathering contemporaneous documents and preparing credible witness statements are key steps to present a coherent, well-supported petition that addresses likely questions and anticipates potential objections from other interested parties or creditors.
A successful Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific assets recognized as trust property, but it does not automatically eliminate probate for unrelated assets that remain in the decedent’s name. The petition is asset-specific and focuses the court’s determination on the items listed in the filing. If other estate assets are improperly titled or contested, separate actions or a broader probate proceeding may be necessary to resolve those matters. In practice, obtaining a Heggstad order for particular accounts or real property often reduces the scope of probate by permitting those assets to pass through the trust, but the overall need for probate depends on the total estate inventory and whether creditors or other parties contest ownership or distribution of other assets.
Yes, proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors as required by California probate statutes is a fundamental part of the Heggstad petition process. Providing notice ensures interested parties have an opportunity to object or present additional evidence and protects the integrity of the court’s determination. Failure to serve required notices can lead to procedural defects, delays, or the need to refile, so accuracy in identifying and notifying interested parties is essential. Serving notice also allows parties to resolve issues through discussion or documentation exchange before a hearing, which can shorten the process and reduce emotional strain. When notice is provided and parties do not object, courts may grant the petition without extensive litigation, facilitating a quicker path to implementing the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute assets.
Creditors may have standing to assert claims against estate assets, and a Heggstad petition does not negate legitimate creditor rights. If creditors assert valid claims, those claims must be addressed in the appropriate forum and may affect whether certain assets are available for trust distribution. Courts consider creditor notice requirements and the timing of claims when resolving asset ownership and may condition relief on adherence to statutory procedures for creditor notice and claims resolution. When creditor concerns exist, the petition process may involve additional steps to preserve creditor rights while seeking recognition for trust ownership. Addressing creditor issues at the outset helps prevent later challenges and creates a clearer path for trustees to manage assets consistent with legal obligations to creditors and beneficiaries alike.
If a court denies a Heggstad petition, the parties must consider alternative remedies, which could include pursuing probate administration, negotiating settlements with interested parties, or addressing evidentiary gaps and refiling if new documentation becomes available. A denial often stems from insufficient evidence of intent or unresolved competing claims, and understanding the court’s reasoning helps guide next steps to protect beneficiary interests and resolve asset ownership questions. After a denial, it may be appropriate to obtain additional documentation, pursue discovery, or consider other probate filings tailored to the estate’s needs. Parties should evaluate the costs and benefits of further litigation versus alternative administrative steps, keeping in mind the goal of completing asset distribution in a way that respects the decedent’s wishes while complying with legal requirements.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the facts, the amount of documentary preparation required, and whether the proceeding is contested. Uncontested filings with thorough pre-filing preparation can be more economical, while contested matters that require discovery, depositions, or extended hearings will incur higher fees. Additional expenses may include court filing fees, fees for record retrieval, and charges for recording deeds or processing title changes after an order is obtained. Estimating costs early in the process helps trustees and families budget appropriately and consider alternative approaches if needed. We provide transparent fee discussions and outline anticipated expenses so clients can make informed choices about pursuing a petition versus other remedies based on case-specific factors and the likely scope of work.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be used for real property when the decedent clearly intended the property to be held by a trust but the deed was never recorded in the trust’s name. Courts evaluate deeds, prior planning documents, tax records, and witness testimony to determine whether the property should be recognized as trust property. A successful petition provides a judicial determination that title is to be treated consistent with the trust, facilitating recording and transfer steps required by title companies. Working with title companies and recording offices is often part of the post-order implementation process to ensure deeds are properly recorded and the trustee has clear legal authority to manage or dispose of the property according to the trust’s terms. Proper documentation and court orders make the process more straightforward for all parties involved.
To start a Heggstad petition in Rancho San Diego, begin by compiling the trust document, account statements, deeds, and any correspondence or documents showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Identify potential witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s planning and any steps taken toward transfers. An early assessment helps determine whether a petition is appropriate and what evidence will be most persuasive. Next, ensure you provide required notices to beneficiaries and potential creditors and prepare the petition and supporting declarations in accordance with local probate rules. Coordinating these steps in advance reduces the likelihood of procedural delays and positions the matter for a timely hearing and resolution before the probate court.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas