A Heggstad petition can be a vital step when a trust has been used to hold assets but title to a property was not formally transferred into that trust. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition seeks to accomplish and how it fits into a broader estate plan managed by the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman. If you or a loved one created a trust and later discovered certain assets never received formal title transfer, a Heggstad petition may be filed to confirm that those assets were intended to belong to the trust at the time the trust maker died, helping to avoid probate and carry out the decedent’s wishes.
Many families find that paperwork, timing, or administrative oversights lead to situations where real property remains titled in the decedent’s name despite clear trust language. The Heggstad petition process provides a court procedure to recognize that oversight and to have the court formally declare that the asset belonged to the trust at the time of death. This page outlines reasons people pursue Heggstad petitions, how the process typically unfolds in California, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients through documentation review, petition preparation, and representation where needed to protect estate plan intentions.
Filing a Heggstad petition can bring clarity and finality after the trust maker’s death by formally recognizing assets that should have been titled to the trust. This avoids the delay and expense of probate for assets that were intended to bypass probate proceedings, preserves privacy for family affairs, and can maintain the streamlined distribution scheme the trust creator set out. The process also prevents future ownership disputes and makes it easier for trustees to manage and distribute trust property according to the trust terms, which can reduce friction among beneficiaries and allow estate settlement to move forward in a predictable manner.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized estate planning and trust administration services for families in California, including Heggstad petitions and trust-related matters. The firm focuses on clear communication, practical strategies, and careful document preparation to minimize delays and disputes. Clients receive thorough document reviews, guidance on trustee duties, and disciplined petition drafting when court action is necessary. The firm’s goal is to honor the estate plan maker’s stated intentions, protect beneficiaries’ interests, and achieve efficient resolution to minimize emotional strain and administrative burden during a difficult time.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to confirm that property left in the decedent’s name was intended to be held by an existing trust at the time of death, even if formal title transfer was not completed. The petition asks the probate court to declare that the trust held legal title, which can allow trustees to administer and distribute the asset without probate. The petition typically includes trust documents, the decedent’s will or pour-over will if applicable, and evidence showing the trust maker’s intent. The process helps bridge gaps between estate planning documents and property records so the estate can be settled according to the plan.
Not every mistake requires a Heggstad petition; however, when critical assets remain titled in the decedent’s name and no straightforward transfer mechanism is available, the petition becomes necessary. The court examines the trust documents and surrounding circumstances to determine intent at the time of death. While the petition focuses on legal title recognition, it also clarifies who has authority to manage the asset during administration. Resolving title issues through a Heggstad petition typically reduces the risk of later disputes and provides a clean path for trustees to follow trust instructions for distribution and management.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that property that remained titled in the decedent’s name was actually trust property at the time of death. This remedy addresses the common scenario where a trust document exists but the title transfer to the trust was overlooked. The petition explains the trust’s terms, the decedent’s intention to fund the trust, and why the asset should be treated as trust property. When granted, the order recognizes trustee authority over the asset, enabling administration without initiating formal probate for that asset and preserving the privacy and efficiency benefits intended by the trust creator.
A successful Heggstad petition generally includes evidence of the trust document, proof of the decedent’s intent to place the asset in the trust, supporting affidavits or declarations, and documentation of any attempts to clear title. The petition will identify the trustee, beneficiaries, asset description, and legal basis for the court to recognize trust ownership. Additional steps may include notifying interested parties, addressing creditor concerns, and obtaining a court order that titles the property as trust-held. Thorough preparation and careful presentation of facts help the court reach a favorable determination and allow trustees to proceed with administration.
Understanding the legal terms involved in a Heggstad petition helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the process with confidence. This glossary clarifies phrases frequently encountered during trust administration and petition proceedings, such as trustee duties, trust funding, title vesting, pour-over will, and court declarations. Knowing these definitions can help clients provide the right documents and testify to intent when necessary. The firm provides plain-language explanations and guidance on assembling evidence that supports the petition so the court can recognize trust ownership and allow distribution under the trust terms.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that requests recognition that property was intended to be part of a trust despite remaining titled in the decedent’s individual name. The petition typically includes the trust document, evidence of intent to fund the trust, and factual details about how the oversight occurred. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order confirming trust ownership that allows trustees to administer and distribute the property consistent with the trust terms, often avoiding probate for that particular asset and enabling more efficient estate settlement.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any probate assets at death to be transferred into a trust, effectively ‘pouring over’ assets into the trust for distribution under its terms. While this device helps ensure assets are ultimately governed by the trust, assets passing through a pour-over will may still be subject to probate unless they were properly retitled or otherwise transferred prior to death. In Heggstad matters, pour-over wills can demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust and support a petition to recognize specific assets as trust-held.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership or control of assets from an individual into a trust so the trust can manage and distribute them according to its terms. Proper funding typically involves re-titling real estate, changing account registrations, or assigning property to the trust. When funding is incomplete and property remains in the decedent’s name after death, a Heggstad petition may be needed to confirm that the trust was intended to hold the asset and to enable trustees to take control of it without probate.
Trustee authority encompasses the legal power granted to an individual or institution under the trust document to manage, invest, and distribute trust assets for the benefit of beneficiaries. In the context of a Heggstad petition, establishing trustee authority over an asset the court recognizes as trust property ensures the trustee can carry out administrative tasks, address liabilities, and distribute the asset as the trust requires. The court’s order confirming trust ownership provides clear legal backing for trustee actions concerning that property.
When confronting assets that were not properly retitled to a trust, families have various options including pursuing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or attempting administrative transfers where permitted. A Heggstad petition focuses on recognition of trust ownership in court without full probate administration for that asset, while probate involves formal estate administration under court supervision and can be lengthier and more public. Choosing the most appropriate route depends on the asset’s value, the clarity of the trust documents, the presence of potential creditors, and the level of agreement among heirs and beneficiaries.
A limited court declaration such as a Heggstad petition may be appropriate when the asset in question is modest in value and there is agreement among beneficiaries that it belonged to the trust. In such situations, the court can issue an order confirming trust ownership without the broader procedural burdens of full probate, enabling a trustee to manage or sell the property as the trust allows. This approach reduces administrative costs, preserves family privacy, and resolves title issues efficiently when the facts and documentation clearly support the trust funding intention.
When trust documents, related correspondence, or transfer-related records clearly show the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust, a limited petition can help the court confirm that intent without the need for a prolonged probate case. Affidavits from trustees or witnesses can bolster the factual record and help the court determine that the asset was effectively trust property despite a titling error. Such a focused remedy is often faster and less disruptive, enabling beneficiaries to proceed under the trust terms without unnecessary delay.
A comprehensive legal approach is warranted when title issues are contested by multiple parties or where beneficiaries disagree about the decedent’s intentions. In those circumstances, more extensive litigation or a full probate administration may be necessary to resolve competing claims, address creditor concerns, and establish clear ownership. Comprehensive representation helps protect the rights of trustees and beneficiaries, marshals evidence effectively, and advocates for orderly estate resolution while minimizing the risk of future challenges to distributions.
When the decedent held numerous assets, real property in several locations, or accounts governed by different institutional rules, a more comprehensive strategy may be needed to coordinate title issues, creditor claims, and tax considerations. Handling these matters requires careful document assembly, potential coordination with out-of-state counsel, and strategic planning to avoid unnecessary litigation. A broad approach can ensure each asset receives appropriate treatment under relevant laws while aligning administration with the trust’s distribution objectives and protecting beneficiaries’ interests across the entire estate.
A comprehensive approach to trust administration and title resolution can prevent future disputes, ensure creditor and tax obligations are addressed properly, and provide beneficiaries with a clear timeline for distribution. By methodically documenting the basis for each asset’s treatment, trustees reduce the likelihood of successful post-distribution challenges and preserve the trust maker’s wishes. The approach also identifies and mitigates potential liabilities, coordinates with financial institutions, and uses court processes judiciously when necessary to secure legal recognition of trust ownership.
Comprehensive handling of trust matters supports efficient property management and can save time and money over the long run by minimizing the chance of contested claims or late-discovered title defects. When trustees proactively resolve outstanding documentation and pursue appropriate court filings—like a Heggstad petition when required—they create legal certainty for successors and beneficiaries. This certainty allows trustees to make practical distribution and management decisions that align with the trust’s goals while reducing administrative friction and preserving family relationships during the settlement process.
One significant benefit of a thorough process is obtaining clear title to assets and lowering the chance of later litigation. When trustees collect and present strong documentary evidence and use court orders to confirm ownership where necessary, subsequent challenges become less likely. Clear title simplifies administration and sale of property, allowing trustees to act confidently on behalf of beneficiaries. This preventive posture supports smoother estate administration and gives beneficiaries reassurance that the decedent’s intentions will be respected and carried out in an orderly fashion.
A comprehensive approach enables trustees to distribute assets efficiently and with a clear legal foundation, reducing delays and unexpected obstacles. By addressing title defects, satisfying administrative requirements, and obtaining judicial confirmation when needed, trustees gain the confidence to implement the trust’s terms without undue risk. Beneficiaries benefit from timely distributions and transparent handling, while the overall administration proceeds with fewer interruptions, maintaining the trust maker’s intended estate plan and reducing the emotional and financial burden on the family.
Begin by collecting all trust documents, wills, deeds, account statements, correspondence showing intent to fund the trust, and any records of attempted transfers. Having these materials organized before filing a petition helps establish the factual basis for court review and reduces delays. Include any notes or communications that indicate the decedent intended assets to be placed in the trust, and prepare sworn declarations from trustees or witnesses who recall the decedent’s actions. Early document collection streamlines the petition preparation and strengthens the record for a court determination.
Consider potential creditor claims and tax implications before filing a petition by reviewing the estate’s liabilities and consulting with tax advisors when necessary. While a Heggstad petition can confirm trust ownership, it does not eliminate lawful creditor rights or tax obligations tied to the decedent’s estate. Trustees should inventory debts, notify creditors as required, and confirm whether federal or state filings are needed. Addressing these matters in advance reduces the risk of post-resolution complications and supports a cleaner transfer of trust assets to beneficiaries.
Consider a Heggstad petition if important assets remain titled in the decedent’s name despite a clear trust intended to own those assets, especially for real estate or high-value accounts where probate would be costly or time-consuming. If trustees encounter institutional resistance when attempting to access or manage property, or if title discrepancies threaten delay in distribution, the petition provides a legal mechanism to align records with the trust maker’s intent. It is also appropriate when a pour-over will demonstrates intent but probate would otherwise be necessary to effect transfer.
Another reason to consider this legal step is when trustees want to reduce uncertainty and potential conflicts among beneficiaries. A court order recognizing trust ownership helps prevent later disputes over who holds authority to manage contested assets. Additionally, families aiming to preserve privacy and avoid the public nature of probate can use the petition to keep certain property matters within the trust context. Overall, where documentation supports trust funding intent but the title record does not, pursuing a Heggstad petition often provides a practical, legally recognized solution.
Common circumstances include oversight during estate planning where deeds or account registrations were not updated, a recent change in health or cognition that prevented transfer before death, or delays caused by administrative hurdles with banks or title companies. These situations often leave significant assets titled in the decedent’s name despite clear trust documentation. When such gaps are discovered during trust administration, trustees may need to pursue a Heggstad petition to confirm ownership and proceed with distribution or sale of the property without opening probate for that particular asset.
It is common for real estate to remain titled in an individual’s name even though a trust was created. This issue often arises when deeds were not re-recorded properly or when closing paperwork did not reflect the trust as the owner. When a trustee encounters a deed in the decedent’s name after death, filing a Heggstad petition can secure a court declaration that the property was intended to be trust-owned, allowing trustees to manage, refinance, sell, or distribute the property according to the trust’s terms while avoiding probate for that asset.
Bank accounts, investment accounts, and retirement assets sometimes remain under an individual’s name when the trust was meant to receive them. Financial institutions may require formal court recognition of trust ownership when account registrations were not changed prior to death. A Heggstad petition can persuade a court to declare those accounts trust property if documentation shows the decedent’s clear intention. Resolving title issues for financial accounts helps trustees access funds needed for administration, debt payment, and beneficiary distributions.
Errors and omissions in the transfer process can leave assets in limbo, with documents that appear to show intent but without corresponding title changes. These administrative mistakes are commonly discovered during trust administration and can be remedied through a Heggstad petition. The petition clarifies ownership by presenting the court with the trust document, evidence of intent, and factual history of the attempted transfer. Once the court issues an order, trustees can act to complete administrative tasks and ensure the trust’s distribution instructions are honored.
Even though the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is based in the broader California area, clients in San Diego Country Estates can obtain guidance for Heggstad petitions and related trust matters. The firm provides attentive client service, document review, and petition preparation tailored to local property records and county court procedures. Trustees and beneficiaries receive assistance identifying required evidence, preparing declarations, and communicating with title companies or financial institutions to achieve an efficient and legally sound outcome for assets intended to be governed by a trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists with thorough case preparation, including reviewing trust documents, gathering supporting evidence, and drafting precise petition paperwork that clarifies the factual basis for court recognition of trust ownership. The firm works to make the court process understandable and manageable for trustees, explaining obligations and timelines while pursuing an outcome that honors the trust maker’s intentions. Attentive representation helps minimize administrative delays and positions clients to resolve title matters effectively and with minimal disruption.
We coordinate communication with financial institutions, title companies, and opposing parties to streamline the path toward a judicial declaration when necessary. The firm emphasizes clear client updates and practical planning to avoid surprises and ensure trustees feel supported throughout petition proceedings. Where negotiation or stipulation with interested parties can resolve matters without contested litigation, the firm seeks cooperative resolutions that save time and expense while achieving the legal recognition required to proceed with trust administration.
Clients benefit from an approach that balances legal thoroughness with attention to family dynamics and cost-effectiveness. The firm helps trustees consider alternatives, prepares necessary notices, and marshals documentary evidence to build a strong record. When court action is needed, petitions are presented clearly and professionally to assist judges in reaching determinations that enable trustees to carry out trust instructions and provide beneficiaries with timely distribution under the trust terms.
The firm’s process begins with an intake to understand the asset, review trust documents, and identify any gaps in title or recordation. From there, we assemble supporting affidavits or declarations, obtain necessary documents from title companies or financial institutions, and prepare a petition tailored to the court’s requirements. We notify interested parties, handle procedural filings, and represent the trustee in hearings when required. Throughout, we provide regular client updates and practical guidance to complete administration and enable distribution under the trust terms as smoothly as possible.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust, related wills, deeds, account statements, and any communications indicating intent to fund the trust. Gathering evidence includes obtaining recorded deeds, account records, and witness declarations that corroborate the trust maker’s actions. This phase ensures the petition presents a clear factual narrative and identifies any potential objections or creditor concerns that must be addressed. Solid documentation reduces the risk of contested proceedings and positions the petition for an efficient court determination.
We assist trustees in locating and securing deeds, titles, financial account statements, and prior correspondence related to transfers. The review focuses on demonstrating the trust maker’s intent to have the asset included in the trust and documenting any attempt to retitle that asset. Where records are incomplete, the firm advises on supplemental declarations and how to obtain missing information from institutions or public records to strengthen the petition. Clear, well-ordered documentation is essential to a persuasive court filing.
When documents alone do not tell the full story, sworn declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals involved in the planning can help explain the decedent’s intent and the circumstances of any titling oversight. These declarations should recount relevant conversations, actions taken to fund the trust, and any obstacles encountered. Well-crafted declarations present facts in a straightforward manner and provide the court with necessary context to determine whether the asset was effectively trust property at the time of death.
Once evidence is compiled, the next step is drafting the petition and accompanying exhibits, ensuring the filing meets local court rules and contains all required notices. The petition sets forth the legal basis for recognition of trust ownership, identifies interested parties, and requests a judicial order to confirm title. Timely and accurate filings reduce the chance of procedural delay. The firm prepares the petition to be clear and legally persuasive, increasing the likelihood of a prompt determination that allows trustees to proceed with administration.
Court filings include the petition, trust excerpts, relevant deeds or account records, and declarations supporting the factual narrative. Exhibits should be clearly labeled and authenticated so the judge can easily review the core documents. The firm ensures exhibits meet evidentiary requirements and that pleadings conform to county-specific filing standards. Careful organization and adherence to procedural rules help the court reach a resolution more efficiently and reduce the chance of requests for supplemental materials or continuances.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is a procedural requirement that protects due process and reduces the risk of future challenges. The firm manages the service of notice in accordance with statutory timelines and records proof of service for the court. When parties respond, the firm evaluates whether stipulations are possible or whether a hearing will be necessary. Timely, accurate notice helps ensure the petition moves forward smoothly and that all potential claimants have an opportunity to be heard.
If a hearing is required, the firm presents the petition to the probate court, emphasizing the trust document, supporting declarations, and evidence of intent. The court will consider any objections and decide whether to grant the requested order recognizing trust ownership. When the court issues its order, trustees receive a clear legal basis to act with respect to the asset in question. The firm assists with implementing the order, updating title or account records, and taking any administrative steps needed to complete trust administration.
At the hearing, the firm explains the factual and legal reasons the court should recognize the asset as trust property, addressing any questions the judge may have and responding to objections. Clear, concise presentation of documents and declarations helps the court understand the trust maker’s intent and the nature of the title discrepancy. Good courtroom preparation and well-organized evidence make it more likely that the court will issue an order that enables trustees to manage and distribute the asset according to the trust.
After the court issues an order, the firm helps trustees record the order where necessary, communicate the change to title companies or financial institutions, and take any follow-up actions to finalize the asset’s placement within the trust. This may include re-recording deeds, transferring account registrations, and coordinating distributions. Completing these administrative steps ensures the court’s determination has its intended effect and that beneficiaries receive assets in accordance with the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing seeking a judicial declaration that a particular asset was intended to be trust property at the time of the trust maker’s death, despite remaining titled in the decedent’s name. It is used when there is clear documentation or other evidence demonstrating intent to fund the trust but the formal title transfer was not completed prior to death. The petition asks the court to recognize trustee authority so the asset can be administered under trust terms rather than through probate. This remedy helps align legal records with the trust maker’s intentions and can prevent unnecessary probate proceedings for the asset. The filing typically includes the trust document or relevant excerpts, affidavits explaining the circumstances, and any deeds or account statements supporting the claim. Courts evaluate these materials to determine whether the trust maker intended the asset to be part of the trust at death. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order confirming trust ownership that trustees can use to manage or distribute the asset, subject to any creditor or notice requirements. The petition process is fact-driven and depends on the strength of available evidence.
The time required to resolve a Heggstad petition varies depending on document readiness, court schedules, and whether interested parties contest the matter. When all evidence is assembled and there are no objections, some petitions can be resolved relatively quickly, within a few weeks to a few months. However, if notice periods, creditor claims, or disputes arise, the process can take longer. County court calendars and procedural requirements also influence timelines, so prompt preparation and adherence to local rules are important for an efficient resolution. Efforts to reduce processing time include thorough pre-filing document collection, clear declarations from trustees or witnesses, and attempts to secure stipulations from beneficiaries. Where parties agree, the court may issue an order on submitted papers without an extended hearing. Preparing a complete, well-supported petition from the outset can minimize the need for supplemental filings and speed up the process, allowing trustees to move forward with administration once the court provides its determination.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific asset identified in the petition if the court recognizes it as trust property, but it does not automatically avoid probate for other estate assets not included in the trust or otherwise properly titled. The petition addresses title recognition for the asset in question and, if successful, allows the trustee to administer or distribute that asset under the trust terms rather than through probate. Other assets that remain outside the trust or that require separate probate procedures would not be affected by a Heggstad order unless separately addressed. It is also important to note that recognized trust property remains subject to any lawful creditor claims or tax obligations. While the petition can limit the need for probate for the identified asset, trustees should still consider creditor notice rules and any necessary estate filings to ensure proper administration. The petition is a targeted remedy that can significantly reduce probate exposure for specific assets when supported by appropriate evidence.
Supporting documents for a Heggstad petition typically include the trust instrument or relevant excerpts, deeds or account statements showing the asset’s current title, any transfer or transfer attempt records, and sworn declarations from trustees or witnesses describing the decedent’s intent and the circumstances of the recording omission. Additional helpful materials may include correspondence with financial institutions or title companies, a pour-over will if one exists, and any contemporaneous notes that indicate funding intentions. Organizing these materials clearly helps the court assess the petition efficiently and reduces the likelihood of delays for supplemental evidence. In some cases, the court may request further documentation or authenticated copies of records, so preparing complete certified copies where possible can prevent follow-up filings. The petition narrative should connect the documentary evidence to the claimed intent, showing how the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust at death. Thoughtful preparation of exhibits and declarations is central to a persuasive filing that secures judicial recognition of trust ownership.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition, particularly if they dispute the decedent’s intent or claim competing rights to the asset. Objections can raise factual disputes about whether the trust maker intended the asset to be in the trust or whether procedural defects exist in the petition. When a contest arises, the court will consider evidence from both sides, and contested proceedings can lengthen the process and increase administrative costs. Early communication and documentation can reduce the likelihood of disputes and sometimes facilitate stipulations that avoid formal contests. When a contest appears likely, trustees benefit from careful evidence preparation and legal representation to present a clear factual record. The court will weigh declarations, documents, and the credibility of witnesses in deciding the matter. The firm assists clients in addressing potential objections proactively, seeking resolutions through stipulation or preparing to defend the petition at a hearing to secure a determination that aligns with the trust maker’s demonstrated intent.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the case, the amount of evidence gathering required, court filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Routine petitions with complete documentation and no disputes typically incur reduced legal time and lower total costs. Conversely, contested petitions that require hearings, depositions, or extensive discovery can increase costs. The firm provides an estimate after an initial review and works with trustees to outline likely fees and court costs so clients can plan accordingly and make informed decisions about proceeding with a petition. Seeking an early assessment of the documentary workload and potential objections can help control costs by focusing efforts on the most persuasive evidence. When possible, pursuing stipulations or negotiated solutions with beneficiaries can substantially reduce legal fees and avoid contested hearings. The firm aims to pursue cost-efficient resolution while ensuring the legal protections and court recognition trustees need to manage and distribute trust property properly.
A Heggstad petition does not eliminate legitimate creditor claims against the decedent’s estate. Courts will consider creditor rights and applicable notice requirements in trust administration matters, and trustees remain responsible for addressing potential debts before final distribution to beneficiaries. If creditor claims exist, trustees must follow statutory notice procedures and may need to reserve funds or address claims through probate administration, depending on the nature of the claim and the assets involved. The petition clarifies ownership but does not negate obligations to satisfy lawful creditor demands. To reduce exposure, trustees should inventory known debts, notify creditors as required by law, and consult advisors to determine whether additional estate procedures are necessary. Proper handling of creditor issues alongside a Heggstad petition protects trustees from personal liability and ensures distributions align with both trust instructions and statutory obligations.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, trustees may need to pursue alternative measures such as full probate administration for the contested asset or further factual development to retry the petition with additional evidence. The denial indicates the court found the submitted record insufficient to conclude the asset was trust property at death. Trustees can review the court’s rationale with counsel, gather any missing documentation or testimony, and consider refiling or proceeding under probate to accomplish necessary transfers and distributions while ensuring legal compliance with estate administration rules. Before taking next steps, trustees should evaluate whether additional evidence can be obtained or whether negotiation with interested parties offers a practical path forward. In some cases, a negotiated settlement or re-examination of transfer records can achieve intended outcomes without prolonged litigation. Legal counsel can advise on the best available options after a denial and help implement subsequent measures to protect beneficiary interests and complete estate administration responsibly.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can apply to bank accounts and investment accounts in addition to real property when the documentation supports that the decedent intended those accounts to be held by the trust. Financial institutions often require clear legal authority or a court order to transfer ownership when account registrations were not changed before death. Presenting a petition with supporting statements and account records can persuade a court to recognize those accounts as trust property and enable trustees to access funds for administration, creditor payments, or beneficiary distributions consistent with the trust’s terms. Some institutions have internal administrative procedures that allow for transfer without court action when they are satisfied with the documentation, but others require judicial recognition. The firm assesses which accounts may be eligible for administrative transfer and which are likely to require a petition, pursuing the most efficient route while ensuring trustees obtain legally sufficient authorization to act on behalf of the trust.
To start the process, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule an initial consultation and provide copies of any trust documents, property deeds, account statements, and related correspondence. During the intake, the firm will review the materials to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, identify missing evidence, and outline the steps to prepare and file the petition. Early document collection and clear communication about the estate’s assets allow the firm to provide a realistic assessment of likely timelines and costs for resolution. After the initial review, the firm assists with gathering remaining documentation, drafting declarations, and preparing the petition for filing in the appropriate county court. Where possible, the firm seeks to resolve matters by stipulation with interested parties to avoid contested hearings, but will proceed to court when necessary to secure legal recognition of trust ownership and enable trustees to complete administration in accordance with the trust maker’s intentions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas