A Heggstad petition is a common tool in California estate administration used when assets intended for a trust were not transferred into the trust before the settlor’s death. If you are a successor trustee or a beneficiary in Spring Valley, understanding how to correct the record and transfer title to the trust can prevent delays in distributing assets. This guide explains the purpose of a Heggstad petition, when it is used, how the process works in probate court, and what documentation is typically required. We also describe how local court practices and timelines can affect the petition process in San Diego County.
Many families encounter situations where real property or other titled assets remain in the deceased person’s name even though a trust was always intended to hold them. A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to confirm that those assets belong to the trust and to authorize the successor trustee to take title. This avoids full probate for those specific assets and clarifies ownership for title companies, lenders, and county records. The petition process involves filing papers, providing proof such as trust documents and transfer intent, and possibly a hearing if objections arise from interested parties.
Filing a Heggstad petition can provide a straightforward pathway to place assets into a trust after a trustmaker has passed away, reducing delay and uncertainty for beneficiaries and trustees. The declaration to the court demonstrates that the decedent intended the asset to be trust property, which helps clear title issues and allows the successor trustee to manage, sell, or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. In many cases, the petition is less involved than full probate contested proceedings and can protect the trustee and beneficiaries by producing a judicial finding confirming the transfer and ownership.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists families in Spring Valley and throughout San Diego County with trust administration tasks, including Heggstad petitions and related documentation. Our approach is to guide clients through the legal and administrative steps needed to clear title and implement the terms of the trust, focusing on practical solutions that move the matter forward. We work with successor trustees to assemble necessary records, prepare clear court filings, and coordinate with title companies so assets can be transferred, sold, or retained according to the trust’s instructions with minimal disruption to beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is appropriate when an asset that should have been owned by a trust remains titled in the name of the deceased. The petition asks the court to determine that the decedent intended the asset to be a trust asset and that it should be transferred to the trust. Evidence commonly includes the trust document, deeds, beneficiary intentions, and any contemporaneous documents or communications showing the intent to fund the trust. Courts will carefully review those materials and may require notice to heirs or other interested parties, allowing them an opportunity to object and present their view on ownership.
The filing process typically starts with a petition and supporting declaration, followed by a notice to interested persons and a potential hearing date. If no one objects, the court may issue an order recognizing the trust’s interest and directing the county recorder or other custodians to transfer title accordingly. If objections are raised, additional evidence and legal argument may be necessary to resolve disputes. Because timelines and local rules vary, coordinating with the recorder’s office, title companies, and counsel can help avoid delays and ensure the transfer is properly recorded and accepted.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in probate court seeking a judicial declaration that certain assets belong to a trust despite being titled in the deceased person’s name. The petition establishes the factual basis for the trust’s ownership, often relying on the trust document, deeds, and other evidence showing the trustmaker’s intention. The resulting court order clarifies ownership for the purpose of recording deeds, transferring assets, or completing financial transactions. This remedy provides a judicially sanctioned way to place intended trust assets under the control of the successor trustee without resorting to full probate for every asset.
Preparing a successful petition involves gathering relevant documents, drafting a clear petition and declaration, providing notice to interested persons, and submitting proposed orders to the court. Evidence demonstrating intent to transfer assets to the trust is important, such as the trust instrument, contemporaneous signed deeds, bank or escrow instructions, and any transfer documents. The court reviews the materials, considers objections if any, and issues an order directing the transfer or recognizing the trust’s title. Working with competent legal counsel and title professionals can help ensure that filings meet court requirements and that recording or transfer steps proceed smoothly after the court decision.
Understanding common terminology can make the petition process less confusing. Terms such as successor trustee, trustee, trust instrument, probate court, notice, and declaration frequently appear in filings and hearings. Knowing what each term means and how it affects rights and responsibilities will help trustees and beneficiaries prepare the necessary documentation and respond appropriately to court notices. This glossary provides plain-language definitions that are helpful when reviewing petitions, supporting declarations, and court orders related to transferring assets into a trust after a trustmaker’s death.
The successor trustee is the individual or institution named in the trust document to take responsibility for managing and distributing trust assets after the trustmaker’s death or incapacitation. This person or entity must follow the trust’s terms and act in the best interests of the beneficiaries. The successor trustee often files Heggstad petitions to place assets into the trust, provides notices to beneficiaries and heirs, and works with the court, title companies, and financial institutions to resolve transfer or title issues in accordance with the trust’s provisions.
Notice to interested persons refers to the legal requirement to inform heirs, beneficiaries, and other parties with a potential interest in the estate or trust of the petition filing. Proper notice gives those parties the opportunity to review the petition and file any objections within a specified timeframe. The notice typically includes information about the hearing date, the nature of the petition, and how to respond. Failing to provide adequate notice can delay proceedings or lead to orders being set aside, so attention to local rules and procedural requirements is essential.
The trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust and sets out its terms, including who the trustmaker is, the successor trustee, the beneficiaries, and the instructions for how assets should be managed and distributed. A clear trust instrument is central to a Heggstad petition because it helps demonstrate that the asset was always intended to be part of the trust. Courts rely on the language of the trust and accompanying evidence to determine whether the transfer should be recognized as valid and enforceable.
A declaration in support is a sworn statement submitted with the petition that explains the facts underlying the request, such as the trustmaker’s intent, the manner in which the asset was handled, and any relevant communications or documents. The declaration may be prepared by the successor trustee or another witness who can attest to the circumstances of the attempted transfer. Clear, factual declarations help the court evaluate the merits of the petition and decide whether to issue an order transferring title to the trust.
When assets remain titled outside of a trust, there are several potential remedies including a Heggstad petition, full probate administration, or transfer via interpleader or quiet title actions in some cases. A Heggstad petition is often more narrowly focused and may be faster and less costly than open probate for specific assets, but it requires persuasive documentation of the trustmaker’s intent. Probate can be broader and may address creditor claims and other matters, but it typically involves more court supervision and administrative steps. Choosing the proper path depends on the assets involved, potential objections, and the goals of the successor trustee and beneficiaries.
A focused petition like a Heggstad petition can be appropriate when only one or a few assets suffer from title defects while the remainder of the estate or trust administration proceeds smoothly. In such situations, addressing specific parcels of real property or particular bank accounts with a narrow court filing avoids the complexity and expense of opening a full probate estate just to resolve isolated transfer problems. Targeting the issue conserves time and resources and can produce a clear order that title companies and recorders will accept for the affected asset.
When documentary evidence strongly supports the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust — such as signed deeds, contemporaneous transfer instructions, or related trust and estate documents — a narrow petition can often secure a favorable court ruling without broader probate proceedings. Courts will consider the totality of the documentation and the circumstances. When the facts are well-documented and objections are unlikely, the Heggstad procedure can resolve ownership quickly and allow the successor trustee to manage the asset under the trust’s terms without unnecessary court supervision.
If multiple assets are affected or if there are competing claims from heirs, creditors, or third parties, a more comprehensive legal approach may be required to address all rights and obligations. Complex situations involving multiple jurisdictions, title defects, or unresolved creditor claims often benefit from broader court supervision so that all parties’ interests can be resolved through a coordinated proceeding. Comprehensive representation can involve coordinated filings, claim resolution strategies, and careful handling of notice and creditor timelines to protect the trust and its beneficiaries.
When heirs or other parties contest the trust’s validity or ownership claims, the matter may require extended litigation, discovery, and multiple hearings. Contested ownership disputes can involve complex factual inquiries into the trustmaker’s intent and transaction history, and may necessitate depositions, expert testimony, or forensic document review. In these scenarios, pursuing a broader legal strategy helps ensure all procedural rights are observed, evidence is properly preserved, and court orders comprehensively resolve competing claims to protect the trustee’s ability to administer the trust.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust funding and title problems addresses both immediate transfer issues and related matters such as creditor claims, tax implications, and beneficiary disputes. This reduces the risk of future litigation by resolving outstanding questions and securing clear court orders that can be relied upon by title companies, financial institutions, and future trustees. A coordinated strategy also ensures compliance with notice requirements and statutory deadlines, which protects beneficiaries and trustees from procedural challenges that could otherwise delay distributions or create uncertainty.
Taking a broader view also allows for strategic sequencing of filings and negotiations to minimize costs and court time. For example, resolving contested issues first or consolidating related matters can limit duplication and provide a single comprehensive resolution for multiple assets. This approach helps preserve the trust’s value and allows trustees to focus on stewardship and distribution rather than piecemeal legal battles. Clear documentation and court orders resulting from a coordinated plan are highly useful when working with title companies and other institutions during asset transfer.
One major benefit of a comprehensive approach is achieving clear title and minimizing future disputes by resolving all likely points of contention at once. Comprehensive proceedings allow the court to consider the range of issues affecting multiple assets and issue orders that comprehensively settle ownership questions. This provides beneficiaries and trustees with greater confidence that transfers are valid and defensible, reducing the likelihood of later challenges that could reverse distributions or create new litigation and administrative costs for the trust.
Another benefit of handling matters in a coordinated way is the potential for streamlined administration and more predictable costs. Consolidating related legal tasks and addressing interconnected issues reduces redundant filings and hearings. This efficiency can lower overall fees and accelerate resolution, allowing trustees to move forward with asset management and distribution in a more timely manner. Planning ahead and addressing foreseeable problems in a single process can reduce uncertainty for beneficiaries and improve the overall administration of the trust estate.
Start by collecting the original trust document, any recorded deeds, transfer instructions, beneficiary lists, and correspondence that indicate the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Early assembly of documents helps create a clear evidentiary record for the petition and reduces the likelihood of delays. Keeping duplicates, certified copies, and recorded instruments together will streamline communications with the court and title companies, and can provide the clarity needed to avoid unnecessary hearings or requests for additional proof.
Before filing, consult with the county recorder and any involved title companies to understand their recording requirements and to confirm what the court order must state for them to accept a transfer. Early coordination helps avoid rework after the court issues an order and can speed up issuance of new title documents or deeds. Title companies often require specific language in orders or additional documentation, so addressing those requirements in advance improves the chances of a smooth, timely transfer after the court’s decision.
Consider a Heggstad petition if an asset that should be in a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, or if record title prevents the successor trustee from managing or distributing the property. The petition provides a judicial route to clarify ownership and place the asset under trust control, which can simplify transactions such as sales or refinancing. When timely documentation of intent exists, the petition can be an effective and focused solution to eliminate title defects and allow the trustee to carry out the trustmaker’s instructions.
A Heggstad petition can also be considered to prevent unresolved title issues from disrupting estate administration or delaying distributions. By obtaining a court order recognizing the trust’s interest, trustees can work with financial institutions and title companies with greater certainty. This approach can save time and expense compared with broader probate proceedings for a single asset and can also reduce the risk of later disputes over ownership by creating a formal record of the court’s determination.
Typical scenarios include a deed that was never recorded, bank accounts remaining in the deceased’s name, real property purchased in the decedent’s individual name instead of the trust, or a transfer that was attempted but not properly documented. Other circumstances include title companies refusing to accept an unrecorded transfer and disputes about whether the asset was intended for the trust. These facts often surface during trust administration and can be resolved efficiently with a focused court petition when adequate supporting documents are available.
Occasionally a deed intended to transfer property to a trust is prepared but not recorded, or the transfer process was left incomplete. In such cases a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership despite the lack of recorded title. Demonstrating the transferor’s intent and providing the underlying trust document and any draft or executed deed helps the court determine whether the asset should be considered trust property. Timely action can prevent obstacles when a trustee seeks to sell or refinance the property.
Bank and investment accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s personal name even though the trust was meant to be the owner. Financial institutions may require a court order or other proof to release funds to the successor trustee. A Heggstad petition can provide the court documentation that convinces institutions to transfer funds into trust accounts or release assets to the trustee, allowing distributions or management under the trust’s terms. Supporting documentation may include account statements, trust documents, and record of intent to fund the trust.
Title companies and lenders may decline to accept an unrecorded transfer or may require a court order before changing title or permitting a sale. A Heggstad petition can secure judicial recognition of the trust’s rights, allowing title companies to issue new policies in the trust’s name and enabling lenders to accept trust-held property as collateral. Coordinating with these entities early and presenting a clear court order speeds transactions and reduces the risk that sale or refinance plans will be impeded by unresolved title issues.
If you are administering a trust in Spring Valley and encounter assets that were never properly transferred, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist in preparing and filing a Heggstad petition and related documents. We help identify required proof, prepare declarations, and ensure interested parties receive appropriate notice. Our goal is to obtain a court order that clarifies title so trustees can carry out the trustmaker’s instructions without unnecessary delays. Assistance extends to coordinating with title companies, recorders, and financial institutions to complete transfers after a court order.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for Heggstad petitions because we focus on practical, well-documented presentations that courts and title companies accept. We assist trustees in assembling trust instruments, deeds, declarations, and other records needed to demonstrate intent to fund the trust, and we handle the procedural steps required by the probate court. Our goal is to reduce administrative burdens for trustees and provide a clear path for transferring assets to the trust so beneficiaries can receive their inheritances according to the trust terms.
We prioritize clear communication with clients and other interested parties to explain the process, expected timelines, and required documentation. That includes advising on how notice should be given and what to expect if objections arise. We also coordinate with title companies and county recorders to ensure the court’s order satisfies their requirements for updating ownership records. This coordination helps reduce the risk of follow-up issues and supports efficient resolution of title problems during trust administration.
When complex issues appear, such as multiple affected assets or potential creditor claims, we help evaluate whether a focused Heggstad petition or a broader legal approach is most appropriate. We work to limit disruption and expense while protecting the rights of trustees and beneficiaries. Our services include drafting petitions, preparing supporting declarations, managing notice and filing requirements, attending hearings if necessary, and assisting with post-order recording and transfers to complete the trust funding process.
Our process begins with a document review and case assessment to confirm that a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We gather trust instruments, deeds, account records, and any relevant communications that show the trustmaker’s intent. Next, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, ensure proper notice to interested parties, and file with the probate court. If needed, we represent the trustee at any hearings. After the court issues an order, we assist with recording deeds and coordinating with title companies and financial institutions to complete the transfer to the trust.
Collecting and organizing the trust document, deeds, account statements, and related materials is the first priority. We review the items for clear evidence of intent to transfer the asset to the trust and identify any gaps that may need supplementary affidavits or declarations. This step also involves identifying interested parties who require notice and confirming whether any pending creditor or third-party claims could affect the process. A thorough initial assessment provides the foundation for a well-supported petition and helps anticipate potential objections or hurdles.
We will request the original trust instrument and any amendments, copies of deeds, bank or brokerage account statements, and any drafts or communications showing attempted transfers. If deeds were prepared but not recorded, those documents and any escrow or closing communications are important evidence. Gathering these materials early helps frame the narrative for the court and demonstrates that the asset was intended to be part of the trust. This also aids title companies in confirming the required documentation once the court issues its order.
We determine who must receive notice of the petition, such as beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors, and prepare and serve notices according to court rules. Proper service and proof of notice are essential to the process to prevent procedural challenges later. We also evaluate whether any parties might object and prepare strategies for responding to potential disputes. Clear notice procedures help the court manage the case efficiently and provide all interested persons the opportunity to present concerns within the statutory timeframes.
Once documents and notice lists are prepared, we draft the Heggstad petition and the supporting declaration that explains the facts and evidence establishing the trust’s interest. We include any necessary exhibits and proposed orders for the court’s convenience. After filing the petition with the probate court, we ensure that service is documented and that any required publication or additional notice steps are completed. Timely and accurate filings reduce the chance of delays and demonstrate the petition’s readiness for judicial consideration.
Supporting declarations are drafted to present a clear factual account of the transaction history, the trustmaker’s intent, and any circumstances that explain why the asset remains outside the trust. Exhibits include the trust document, draft or recorded deeds, account records, and correspondence. Well-prepared exhibits and concise declarations help the court understand the basis for the request and can shorten hearings or reduce the chance of contested proceedings. Exhibits are organized to make the factual showing straightforward for judicial review.
After filing, we promptly serve the petition and proof of filing on all required parties and provide proof of service to the court. We track filing deadlines and response windows and handle any procedural follow-up the court requires. If no objections are filed, the court often issues an order based on the papers alone. If objections are raised, we prepare responses and legal arguments to address the concerns. Managing this stage carefully is key to an orderly and efficient resolution of the matter.
After the court reviews the petition and any responses, it may issue an order recognizing the trust’s interest and directing that title be transferred or recorded in the trust’s name. Once the order is entered, we assist with recording deeds or providing the order to financial institutions and title companies so transfers can be completed. We also advise trustees on any follow-up steps, such as updating insurance policies, notifying tenants, or handling proceeds from a sale, to ensure the trust’s assets are managed consistently with the court’s order and the trust terms.
When the court issues an order, we obtain certified copies and prepare any necessary deeds or recording documents for submission to the county recorder. We confirm that the order language meets title company requirements and coordinate recording to update public records. Timely recording ensures the trust appears as the rightful owner in public records and supports future transactions involving the asset. We also provide trustees with copies of the recorded documents and guidance on preserving the trust’s chain of title.
Following the court order, we work with banks, brokers, and title companies to effectuate transfers, close accounts, or issue new title policies in the trust’s name. Providing certified court orders, recorded deeds, and other authenticated documents helps these institutions complete required processes. We also advise trustees on steps to manage the asset under the trust, such as arranging for insurance, tenant notifications, or sale logistics. Proper coordination after the court’s decision ensures the trust’s interests are protected and assets are ready for administration or distribution.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare that certain assets belong to a trust even though title remains in the deceased person’s name. This remedy is used when the trustmaker intended assets to be held by the trust but formal transfer or recording was not completed before death. The petition relies on the trust instrument and other evidence to demonstrate intent and requests a court order directing the transfer of title to the trust so the successor trustee can manage or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms. This process is often chosen when specific assets need to be placed into the trust without opening a full probate estate for everything. It can save time and expense for isolated title issues, but the court will require sufficient documentation and appropriate notice to interested parties. If objections are raised, a hearing may be necessary to resolve disputes about intent or ownership, so preparing thorough supporting documents is important to the petition’s success.
Timing for a Heggstad petition in San Diego County varies depending on court schedules, notice periods, and whether objections are filed. If paperwork is complete and no one objects, the matter may be resolved without a contested hearing, and an order could be issued within a few weeks to a few months depending on the court’s calendar. Preparation time prior to filing, including collecting documents and preparing declarations, also affects the overall timeline. If objections or factual disputes arise, the process can extend longer as the court schedules hearings and allows for additional evidence and responses. Factors such as the need for additional discovery, hearing availability, and coordination with title companies for post-order recording also influence how long the entire matter will take to conclude. Early document preparation and clear notice practices can help avoid avoidable delays.
Supporting documents for a Heggstad petition typically include the trust instrument and any amendments, deeds or deed drafts, bank or brokerage statements if accounts are involved, and written evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from the successor trustee or witnesses that detail the history of the attempted transfer and any contemporaneous communications are commonly submitted. Exhibits should be organized clearly so the court can readily see the connection between the asset and the trust. Additional documents might include title reports, escrow records, and correspondence with financial institutions or title companies. If recording was attempted but not completed, those records are important. The strength and clarity of these documents influence the court’s willingness to enter an order recognizing the trust’s interest, so thorough preparation and careful presentation of evidence are essential.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not automatically open a full probate estate for all of the decedent’s assets. The petition specifically addresses the ownership of particular assets alleged to belong to the trust, and a successful petition results in a court order dealing with those items. However, certain circumstances, such as unresolved creditor claims or disputes about the trust’s validity, could lead to additional proceedings that involve broader probate matters. If only the Heggstad petition is necessary to correct title for specific assets, then focus remains on those assets and the trust administration typically continues outside the probate court’s broader supervision. When questions about the trust’s validity or competing claims emerge, the court may need to consider wider issues, which could expand the scope beyond a narrow petition.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should not be placed in the trust or if they contest the facts supporting the transfer. Proper notice to interested persons allows them the opportunity to file objections within the court’s prescribed timeframe. If objections are filed, the court may schedule a hearing to hear evidence and make a determination about ownership based on the trust documents, witness declarations, and other relevant materials. Handling objections involves preparing factual and legal responses to refute competing claims and presenting convincing documentary evidence of the trustmaker’s intent. In some cases, objections are resolved through negotiation or stipulation, while in others a contested hearing is necessary to resolve conflicting evidence. Thorough preparation before filing reduces the likelihood of successful challenges.
A court order recognizing that an asset belongs to a trust can be sufficient for title companies to issue new title insurance in the trust’s name or for lenders to accept the trust as owner for refinancing or sale purposes. Title companies often require specific language in the court order and may ask for certified copies of recorded deeds or additional documentation. Coordinating with the title company before filing helps ensure the court’s order will meet their requirements for reissuing title policies or clearing title defects. For refinancing, lenders typically require clear title and evidence that the trustee has authority to act. Providing the lender with the court order and recorded documents supports closing transactions. Early communication with title companies and lenders helps identify their documentation needs so the petition and proposed orders can be drafted to satisfy those requirements, reducing delays after the court’s decision.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include opening a probate administration for the decedent’s estate, pursuing quiet title actions in certain circumstances, or negotiating directly with title companies and institutions to accept alternative proof of ownership. Probate can address broader claims and creditor issues but generally involves more supervision and expense. Quiet title actions may be effective in some disputes, particularly when adverse possession or long-standing title claims exist, but they may not always be the most efficient route for trust funding issues. Selecting the best alternative depends on the assets involved, the presence of disputes, creditor concerns, and the intended outcome. Consulting on the facts early helps identify the most efficient and cost-effective approach, whether that means a focused petition, a negotiated settlement with the involved parties, or a broader probate or civil proceeding to resolve contested ownership matters comprehensively.
Notice must be given to all interested persons, which typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, known heirs, surviving spouse or domestic partner, and any parties with a potential legal claim against the property. The probate court’s local rules specify who must be served and how notice should be given, and proof of service must be filed with the court. Properly identifying and notifying these parties is essential to protect the validity of any subsequent court order and to ensure due process for those with potential interests in the asset. Failure to provide adequate notice can lead to orders being challenged or set aside, which prolongs resolution and may increase costs. In some cases, additional or alternative notice methods, such as publication, may be necessary if interested persons cannot be located. Documenting efforts to identify and notify interested persons provides the court with assurance that parties had the opportunity to be heard.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the successor trustee and beneficiaries will need to evaluate next steps based on the reasons for denial. The court’s decision will typically explain the factual or legal deficiencies, such as insufficient proof of intent or competing claims. Depending on the circumstances, the trustee may gather additional evidence and refile, seek a different legal remedy, or proceed with alternative methods of resolving ownership, including probate administration or civil actions to determine title or rights to the asset. Denial may also prompt discussions with heirs or interested parties to negotiate a resolution outside of court, which could involve settlement agreements, conveyances, or other transfers. Reviewing the court’s findings and considering cost-effective alternatives helps trustees determine the most practical path forward to protect the trust’s interests and minimize further delays.
The cost of a Heggstad petition varies based on factors such as the complexity of the facts, the number of assets involved, the need for hearings, and whether objections are filed. Costs include court filing fees, potential costs for certified copies and recordings, and legal fees for preparing the petition and supporting documents. If the matter proceeds without objection and the evidence is clear, fees can be more modest, but contested matters requiring hearings or additional pleadings will increase costs. Estimating expenses at the outset helps trustees plan for likely outlays. Because every case is different, we provide an initial assessment to outline likely steps and associated costs and to identify whether a focused petition or broader approach will be more appropriate. Early screening and efficient document preparation can limit unnecessary expenses and help achieve a timely resolution while preserving the trust’s assets for beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas