A Heggstad petition can be the key to transferring property into a trust when title was never retitled after the trust was created. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist Winter Gardens residents who discover assets intended for a trust remain titled in an individual name. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition is, how it works in California courts, and practical steps families commonly take to confirm trust ownership. Our goal is to provide clear, practical information to help you determine whether a petition may resolve a funding oversight or clarify trust administration matters.
Many people assume that signing a trust alone is enough to move assets into it, but deeds, account registrations, and titles must often be changed to avoid later issues. A Heggstad petition offers a judicial path to treat property as trust property when the trust maker intended it to be included but formal retitling did not occur. This process can prevent lengthy probate, confirm trustee authority, and reduce disputes among heirs. Understanding the petition timeline, documentation required, and potential outcomes helps families make informed decisions during trust administration and estate planning transitions.
Filing a Heggstad petition can deliver important benefits for people managing an estate or administering a trust after a trust maker dies or becomes incapacitated. The petition can provide a court determination that certain assets belong to the trust, enabling trustees to manage, sell, or distribute those assets without separate probate proceedings. It also helps prevent future title disputes by documenting the trust maker’s intent. For families in Winter Gardens and San Diego County, obtaining a clear court order via a Heggstad petition can streamline administration, reduce uncertainty for beneficiaries, and help preserve estate value by avoiding redundant legal processes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has represented clients throughout San Jose and San Diego County on a wide range of estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. Our firm focuses on practical solutions tailored to individual family situations, prioritizing clear communication and thorough documentation. When clients face unretitled assets or disputed ownership, we evaluate records, prepare the necessary pleadings, and advocate for a resolution that aligns with the trust maker’s intent and California law. We also provide guidance on related documents like pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and trust certifications to reduce future complications.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request to recognize that certain property is part of a trust despite the absence of formal retitling. Originating from California law, the petition asks the court to accept extrinsic evidence showing the trust maker intended the asset to be held by the trust. Evidence can include draft deeds, trust documents, correspondence, beneficiary designations, or other contemporaneous records. The court then evaluates whether the trust maker’s intent is sufficiently demonstrated to treat title as belonging to the trust. This mechanism helps trustees avoid separate probate proceedings and provides legal clarity for asset management and distribution.
The Heggstad process typically begins with gathering all relevant documents and communicating with interested parties or potential beneficiaries. A petition is prepared and filed in the appropriate California probate or superior court, accompanied by declarations and exhibits supporting the claim. Notice requirements must be met to allow beneficiaries and interested persons to respond. In many cases, people resolve disputes through negotiation, but the court can hold a hearing to make final determinations. Timing, costs, and likely outcomes vary depending on the complexity of title issues and the willingness of parties to cooperate.
At its core, a Heggstad petition seeks a posthumous judicial recognition that specific property was intended to be owned by a trust despite not being formally transferred into the trust’s name. Petitioners present evidence to show the trust maker’s clear and convincing intent that the asset should be trust property. The court reviews deeds, trust documents, communications, and transaction histories to determine whether this intent can be established. If successful, the court issues an order treating the asset as trust property, which can prevent probate, authorize trustee actions, and clarify beneficiary rights for distribution or sale of that asset.
When reviewing a Heggstad petition, courts consider several key elements: whether the trust maker intended the asset to be part of the trust, the presence of supporting documents or statements that reflect that intent, and the practical steps taken by the trust maker toward funding the trust. Judges examine declarations, correspondence with banks or title companies, and draft instruments. The clarity and weight of the evidence often determine whether the court will grant the petition. Petitioners should assemble a thorough record and be prepared to explain any gaps in retitling or paperwork to help the court reach a consistent, legally sound conclusion.
Understanding the terminology used in trust administration and Heggstad petitions makes it easier to prepare a convincing case and communicate with the court. Terms such as trust funding, pour-over will, trustee, beneficiary, deed of trust, and probate each play a role in determining ownership and transfer of assets. This section presents concise definitions and explanations for terms commonly used when addressing unretitled property and submitting a petition under California law. Clear definitions help family members, trustees, and interested parties navigate the legal process and understand expectations around documentation and outcomes.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so they are legally owned and managed by the trust under the terms set by the trust document. Funding typically requires retitling property, changing account registrations, or reassigning ownership. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be used to show the trust maker intended certain assets to be included despite missing formal steps. Proper funding reduces the likelihood of probate and clarifies the trustee’s authority to manage, sell, or distribute assets in accordance with the trust’s instructions.
A pour-over will functions to move assets into a trust upon the trust maker’s death that were not previously transferred during their lifetime. It typically directs that any remaining probate assets be transferred to the trust, complementing the trust funding process. While a pour-over will helps ensure assets benefit from a trust plan, it does not avoid probate for assets held individually at death. In circumstances where property should have been part of the trust, a Heggstad petition may be filed to confirm those assets belong to the trust and reduce the need for probate administration of those items.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing and administering trust assets according to the terms set by the trust maker. Duties include collecting trust property, managing investments, paying debts and expenses, and distributing assets to beneficiaries. When assets remain unretitled, trustees may seek clarification through legal processes like a Heggstad petition to establish that certain property is trust property. Clear trustee documentation and thorough records of the trust maker’s intent assist the court in confirming the trustee’s authority to act on behalf of the trust.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are titled in an individual’s name at death and no valid trust applies. Probate involves validating a will, appointing an administrator or executor, and distributing assets under court oversight. A successful Heggstad petition can reduce or eliminate the need for probate by allowing the court to treat unretitled assets as trust property, thereby enabling trustee administration instead of probate administration. Avoiding probate can save time, reduce court involvement, and preserve estate assets for beneficiaries.
When facing unretitled assets, families must evaluate options such as filing a Heggstad petition, proceeding through full probate, or pursuing negotiated transfers with beneficiaries and institutions. Probate can be time-consuming and costly, whereas a Heggstad petition can provide a targeted court determination that certain assets belong to a trust. Negotiated solutions may resolve issues faster but require agreement among interested parties. Determining the best path depends on asset value, the clarity of the trust maker’s intent, the likelihood of disputes, and the timeline for administration. Legal guidance helps choose an efficient and lawful course tailored to each situation.
A limited approach may be effective when strong, contemporaneous documentation clearly shows that the trust maker intended a specific asset to be part of the trust. Documents such as signed trust provisions, draft deeds, or written communications to a title company or financial institution that explicitly indicate the intent to transfer can sometimes prompt institutions to retitle assets voluntarily or enable a streamlined court filing. When parties agree on the facts and the documentation is persuasive, a less adversarial process may avoid a full probate action and resolve the funding gap more quickly and cost-effectively.
If all beneficiaries and potential claimants agree that an asset belongs to the trust and are willing to cooperate, an informal resolution or stipulated court order may be possible. Agreement reduces conflict, eliminates the need for contentious hearings, and can lead to a faster resolution. Trustees often start by providing documentation to beneficiaries and institutions, seeking written consents or stipulated orders to confirm trust ownership. When parties are aligned, the process is streamlined, minimizing costs and preserving family relationships by addressing the issue collaboratively rather than through protracted litigation.
Comprehensive legal action becomes necessary when there is contested ownership or conflicting evidence about whether an asset should have been transferred to a trust. In such situations, interested parties may disagree about the trust maker’s intent or present competing documentation. A full Heggstad petition with declarations, documentary evidence, and potentially testimony provides a formal record for the court to evaluate. When disputes are present, careful litigation planning, thorough evidence gathering, and measured advocacy help ensure the court can reach a reliable decision about title and trust ownership.
Cases involving multiple assets, complex titles, or assets in multiple jurisdictions may require a comprehensive legal approach. Issues such as joint tenancy rights, retirement account beneficiary designations, or properties with encumbrances demand detailed analysis to determine whether a Heggstad petition or alternate filings will provide the intended result. Coordinating with financial institutions, title companies, and lien holders can be time-intensive. In these scenarios, a structured court petition helps ensure all legal questions are addressed and that the trust maker’s intent is reflected across each affected asset.
Pursuing a formal Heggstad petition can provide durable legal clarity by producing a court order that treats specified property as trust property. This reduces the risk of later challenges, enables trustees to act confidently in managing assets, and can prevent separate probate proceedings. Court determinations also create a clear public record that can be useful when dealing with title companies, banks, or third parties who require legal confirmation of ownership. For families seeking finality and predictable administration, a comprehensive approach can be the most reliable path to resolving funding oversights.
A formal court resolution often protects beneficiaries and trustees by addressing potential disputes head-on and establishing a definitive legal conclusion. This process can streamline subsequent transfers, sales, or distributions and can often reduce long-term costs associated with unresolved title issues. While there are upfront filing fees and procedural steps, the ultimate benefit is a legally enforceable determination aligned with the trust maker’s intent, which helps preserve estate value and reduces uncertainty for those responsible for administering trust assets.
A court order confirming that property belongs to a trust enhances the marketability of real estate and other titled assets by removing ambiguity around ownership. Title companies and potential buyers are more willing to proceed when a court has recognized trust ownership, making it easier to sell or refinance property. This clarity is especially valuable for trustees needing to liquidate assets to pay debts or distribute proceeds to beneficiaries. The legal confirmation reduces the chance of future disputes that could interfere with transactions or complicate estate administration.
By having a court treat assets as trust property, trustees can administer those assets without resorting to full probate, diminishing court supervision and associated delays. This streamlining can conserve estate resources and speed distribution to beneficiaries according to the trust terms. Reducing exposure to probate also helps maintain family privacy and limits the public record of estate details. Overall, a successful Heggstad petition supports efficient trust administration and helps fiduciaries fulfill their duties with less administrative friction and legal uncertainty.
Start by gathering trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, emails, and any drafts that reflect the trust maker’s intent. Records that show efforts to fund the trust or communications with financial institutions can be persuasive. Early documentation reduces the time needed to prepare a petition and strengthens the factual basis for filing. Keeping a clear, organized file helps trustees and family members respond to inquiries from the court or third parties and makes the path to a court determination more efficient and cost-effective for everyone involved.
Evaluate whether a Heggstad petition or an alternate approach provides the best balance of cost, timing, and finality. There are court filing fees and the potential for contested proceedings, so weighing the value of the affected assets against likely expenses is important. In many situations, resolving issues early while documentation remains available and witnesses are able to corroborate intent yields better results. Trustees should plan for reasonable timelines, anticipate potential delays, and maintain transparency with beneficiaries about expected process and costs.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets reasonably appear to have been intended for a trust but were never formally retitled, and that gap creates administrative obstacles or potential disputes. Typical triggers include discovering deeds still in the decedent’s name, bank accounts not updated to the trust, or real property that bears no trust vesting despite clear indications of the trust maker’s intent. Filing a petition can provide a court determination that allows the trustee to act, limits the need for probate, and gives beneficiaries clarity about their interests based on the trust’s terms.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when third parties such as title companies, banks, or purchasers require a court order to recognize trust ownership before completing transactions. A formal order prevents delays in selling or refinancing property and reduces the risk of future disputes over transfers. If beneficiaries or heirs question ownership or contest administration, a Heggstad petition brings the matter before the court for a definitive ruling, establishing a recorded legal determination that supports trust administration and protects the trustee in carrying out their responsibilities.
Heggstad petitions commonly arise after a trust maker dies or becomes incapacitated and the successor trustee finds property still titled in the individual’s name. Other scenarios include recently purchased real estate that was intended for the trust but the deed was never recorded in the trust’s name, retirement accounts with mismatched beneficiary designations relative to the trust plan, and assets transferred informally without consistent paperwork. These circumstances prompt trustees to seek a court order to align title with the trust maker’s intent in order to proceed with administration and distribution.
When a home or other real property was intended to be owned by the trust but the deed remains in the decedent’s name, trustees may face obstacles in selling, refinancing, or managing the property. A Heggstad petition can present evidence such as trust documents, purchase paperwork, and communications to show that the trust maker intended the property to be part of the trust. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it can issue an order treating the property as trust property, enabling trustees to complete transactions and distribute proceeds as directed by the trust.
Accounts intended for the trust but left in the trust maker’s individual name create practical complications for trustees who need to access funds to pay expenses or distribute assets. Banks and investment firms may require court documentation before allowing transfers. A Heggstad petition supported by account statements, beneficiary designations, and written instructions can help demonstrate intent and secure a court order recognizing trust ownership. This clarifies authority for trustees to manage those accounts without engaging in full probate proceedings, saving time and legal expense when successful.
Sometimes documents suggest mixed intentions, such as a trust that mentions an asset but a deed that was never updated. Conflicting or incomplete records can lead to disputes among heirs or institutions. In such cases, a Heggstad petition allows the court to evaluate all evidence and determine whether the trust maker intended the asset to be included in the trust. By resolving conflicting documentation through a judicial order, trustees can proceed with confidence while beneficiaries receive clarity around ownership and distribution under the trust’s terms.
If you live in Winter Gardens and face unretitled trust assets, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. Our approach begins with a careful review of trust documents, deeds, account records, and communications that reflect the trust maker’s intent. We explain the likely paths forward, estimate timelines and costs, and work to secure a practical resolution that serves trustees and beneficiaries. Residents may contact our office to schedule a consultation and begin assembling the records needed to pursue a petition or alternative solutions.
Choosing legal assistance matters when pursuing a Heggstad petition because accurate pleadings and well-documented evidence are essential to persuading the court. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on preparing clear, persuasive petitions and supporting records tailored to the facts of each matter. We prioritize communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and we coordinate with title companies and financial institutions as needed. Our goal is to present a factual, procedural path that maximizes the chance of a favorable determination while minimizing disruption and cost for the family.
We also help clients understand the likely outcomes and prepare for potential responses from interested parties. When negotiation is possible, we pursue stipulated orders to expedite resolution. When disputes arise, we compile detailed evidence and present it to the court to obtain a definitive order that clarifies ownership. Clients appreciate our practical orientation and emphasis on efficient resolution that protects trust value and supports timely administration for beneficiaries, allowing trustees to focus on their fiduciary responsibilities without undue delay.
Finally, our office provides guidance on related estate planning steps to avoid future funding gaps, including preparing pour-over wills, updating beneficiary designations, and ensuring deeds and account registrations align with trust terms. We assist trustees in understanding their duties and in taking the technical steps required after a court order issues. By addressing both immediate litigation needs and long-term planning, we help families reduce the likelihood of recurring issues and promote smoother trust administration for future generations.
Our process begins with a focused intake to identify the affected assets and assemble supporting records. We review trust documents, deeds, statements, and correspondence to evaluate whether a petition is likely to succeed. Next, we prepare a petition and supporting declarations, file the necessary court documents, and serve notice on interested parties. If possible, we seek stipulated resolutions; if contested, we prepare for hearings by organizing evidence and witness statements. Throughout, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed about timing, costs, and possible outcomes to support effective decision making.
The initial stage concentrates on collecting and analyzing all relevant documents that demonstrate the trust maker’s intent. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, account forms, correspondence with advisors or financial institutions, and any draft documents. We also identify interested parties who must be notified. A thorough evidentiary record increases the probability of a favorable judicial determination and helps anticipate questions opponents or the court may raise. Careful preparation at this stage makes subsequent filings more persuasive and efficient, reducing the chance of unnecessary hearings or delays.
Collecting original trust documents, recorded deeds, escrow statements, and account records forms the backbone of a Heggstad petition. These records help show the trust maker’s intent and any efforts made to fund the trust. We coordinate with clients to obtain relevant paperwork and request certified copies where necessary. In addition, we identify potential gaps and obtain supporting declarations from people who can attest to the trust maker’s stated intentions or actions, building a factual foundation the court can rely on when considering the petition.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested persons is a required component of the Heggstad process. We determine who must be served and prepare the required legal notices and proofs of service. Timely notification allows parties to raise objections or agree to stipulated resolutions. This step also creates a formal record of outreach and helps prevent later procedural challenges. Coordinating appropriate notice and service is a practical safeguard that supports the petition’s validity and reduces the risk of procedural impediments.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires precise legal pleadings and supporting declarations that clearly present the factual basis for treating the property as trust property. We draft the petition to align with local court rules and evidentiary standards, attach exhibits that demonstrate intent, and prepare declarations from individuals with personal knowledge. Accurate and persuasive filing reduces the likelihood of procedural defects and positions the petition for prompt consideration. We also manage filing logistics, court fees, and serve the petition on all required parties to maintain procedural compliance.
We assemble a coherent evidentiary package including declarations from trustees, witnesses, and professionals who recall the trust maker’s intent, along with documentary exhibits. Declarations explain the context for any missing formal transfers and the steps the trust maker took toward funding. These narrative components help the court understand the history and the logical basis for treating assets as trust property. Crafting clear, well-organized declarations is central to persuading the court that the trust maker intended the asset to be included in the trust.
Once the petition and exhibits are finalized, we file the documents with the proper probate or superior court and ensure timely service on all required parties. Compliance with local rules for filing and service is essential to avoid delays or challenges. We provide clients with copies of filed documents, track proof of service, and communicate any responses or oppositions that arise. Proper filing and service establish the procedural foundation for the court to hear and rule on the petition, paving the way for negotiated resolutions or contested proceedings if necessary.
After filing, courts may accept stipulated resolutions if parties agree, or set hearings to evaluate contested matters. We prepare clients for possible hearings by organizing exhibits, developing witness declarations, and addressing opponent claims. At the hearing, the court reviews the record and issues an order either granting or denying the petition, or entering a stipulated judgment that reflects parties’ agreements. When a court order is entered treating property as trust property, we assist with implementing the order, notifying title companies, and updating records to reflect the court’s determination.
When beneficiaries and trustees agree on the facts, it is often possible to obtain a stipulated order that resolves the matter without a contested hearing. Stipulated orders are efficient and limit time in court, and they create a binding judicial determination when entered. Our role includes drafting agreed-upon terms, coordinating signatures, and ensuring the stipulated order is properly submitted to the court for approval. Stipulated resolutions preserve relationships and reduce legal costs while still providing the certainty associations and institutions require.
If objections arise, the court may hold a contested hearing where evidence and testimony support the petition or opposing claims. At that stage, meticulous presentation of documentary evidence and credible declarations is vital. The judge evaluates the totality of the record to determine whether the trust maker’s intent is sufficiently demonstrated. A favorable ruling results in an order treating the asset as trust property, enabling trustees to carry out their duties. When contested, careful preparation can make the difference in achieving a clear, enforceable outcome.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to ask a judge to treat an asset as belonging to a trust even though formal retitling was not completed. It is used when evidence demonstrates that the trust maker intended the asset to be included in the trust. Such petitions are common for real property or accounts that were overlooked during trust funding. The petition presents declarations and documentary evidence showing the circumstances and intent, enabling the court to issue an order recognizing trust ownership when the evidence supports that outcome. The petition is typically filed by a trustee or interested party and must include sufficient proof of intent and notice to interested persons. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence, including trust documents, draft deeds, correspondence, and witness declarations. If the court finds the trust maker’s intent adequately established, it may issue an order treating the asset as trust property, which facilitates trustee actions without a separate probate estate for that asset.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on case complexity, the court’s calendar, and whether the matter is contested. In uncontested situations where parties agree, resolution can occur more quickly through stipulated orders, often within a few months. When disputes arise or the court requires extensive evidence or hearings, the process can extend for many months. Factors such as obtaining certified documents, serving notice on interested parties, and preparing declarations all influence the overall timing. Planning for the petition involves allowing time to gather records and coordinate with beneficiaries or institutions. Early identification of potential objections and proactive communication can shorten the process. Our office works to provide realistic timing estimates based on the facts of each case and to move filings forward efficiently while complying with procedural requirements.
Courts consider a combination of documentary and testimonial evidence to determine whether a trust maker intended an asset to belong to the trust. Helpful evidence includes the trust instrument itself, deeds or drafts showing intent to transfer, escrow or purchase documents, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, relevant correspondence with advisors or institutions, and declarations from persons with direct knowledge of the trust maker’s intent. The consistency and proximity of such records to the transaction date strengthen the petition. Additionally, courts evaluate whether reasonable steps were taken toward funding and whether any contrary documents exist. Declarations that explain why retitling did not occur and that corroborate the trust maker’s stated intentions are often important. Building a clear, well-documented record improves the petition’s chances of success and helps the court reach a legally sound decision.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent the need for a separate probate proceeding for the specific asset at issue by obtaining a court order that treats the asset as trust property. When the court recognizes the asset as part of the trust, trustees can manage, sell, or distribute it under the trust terms without administering it through probate. However, a Heggstad petition addresses only the assets specified in the petition; other assets not included in the trust may still require probate if they remain titled in the decedent’s name. Therefore, while a petition can reduce probate exposure for particular items, comprehensive estate planning and careful funding remain important to minimize probate needs across the entire estate. Using a petition strategically often complements broader estate administration efforts to streamline outcomes and protect beneficiaries’ interests.
Proper notice is a required component of the Heggstad process and typically must be given to beneficiaries, heirs, successors, and any other interested parties who may be affected by the determination. The court’s local rules and statutory requirements dictate who must be served and what form of notice is necessary. Serving notice ensures that interested parties have the opportunity to review the petition and raise objections if they believe the court should not treat the asset as trust property. Timely and accurate service of notice protects the procedural validity of the petition and reduces the likelihood of later challenges based on inadequate notice. We identify required recipients, prepare appropriate service documents, and track proofs of service to demonstrate compliance with court rules, helping ensure the petition proceeds without avoidable procedural setbacks.
If beneficiaries object to a Heggstad petition, the matter may proceed to a contested hearing where the court examines the evidence and hears arguments from both sides. Objections can be based on alleged lack of intent, conflicting documents, or concerns about trustee actions. In contested cases, thorough documentary evidence and credible witness declarations are critical to persuading the court that the trust maker intended the asset to be part of the trust. Contested proceedings may also involve discovery and additional declarations to address disputed facts. When objections arise, we seek to resolve disputes through negotiation and mediation where feasible, aiming for a stipulated outcome that avoids lengthy litigation. If a hearing becomes necessary, we prepare a clear evidentiary record to present to the judge. Resolving objections through agreement is often more efficient, but the court remains the ultimate decision maker when parties cannot reach consensus.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include negotiating voluntary retitling with institutions, obtaining beneficiary consents, or using a pour-over will to transfer assets to the trust via probate if the asset qualifies for that route. When financial institutions or title companies accept the trust maker’s intent based on documentation, they may retitle property without a court order. This informal path can be faster and less expensive but depends on the willingness of third parties and the clarity of the factual record. When informal solutions are insufficient or parties disagree, a Heggstad petition provides a formal legal remedy. Choosing among alternatives requires weighing costs, timing, the strength of available evidence, and the level of likely opposition. Our office helps assess these considerations and recommends the most practical and legally sound approach for each situation.
A court order recognizing an asset as trust property generally improves the marketability of real estate and other titled assets by clarifying ownership. Title companies and prospective buyers typically prefer a recorded court order when titles are ambiguous, so having a judicial determination removes doubts that might otherwise stall transactions. This legal clarity facilitates sales, refinancing, and transfers by providing a defensible basis for the change in ownership and easing title company concerns about hidden claims or disputes. Without a court order, banks and title firms may require additional assurances or decline transactions, which can delay or complicate sales. Thus, a successful petition often makes it simpler to proceed with market transactions and secures smoother administration for trustees who must manage or liquidate assets for the benefit of beneficiaries.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the matter, the number of interested parties, and whether the petition is contested. Expenses typically include court filing fees, costs for certified copies or title reports, and legal fees associated with preparing the petition, gathering supporting documents, and handling service and court appearances. When matters are uncontested and parties agree, costs can be significantly lower. Contested proceedings or cases requiring extensive evidence gathering will increase the total expense. It’s important to evaluate costs relative to the value of the asset and the benefit of obtaining clear legal title. We provide initial consultations to estimate likely costs and develop a strategy aimed at achieving an efficient and cost-effective resolution based on the specifics of each case, including potential alternatives to a formal petition when appropriate.
To begin the process, gather all trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence relevant to the asset in question. Contact our office to schedule an initial consultation where we review the records, identify interested parties, and advise on the strength of the available evidence. Early assessment helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the best avenue or whether alternative measures such as voluntary retitling or negotiated agreements are feasible and more efficient for your situation. During the intake, we explain the likely steps, timeline, and documentation needed to proceed. If filing a petition is appropriate, we assist in preparing the pleadings, serving notice, and pursuing either an uncontested resolution or a contested hearing when necessary. Prompt action and organized records increase the likelihood of a timely and favorable outcome.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas