A Heggstad petition can be the most efficient path to transferring assets that were intended to be included in a trust but remain titled in an individual’s name. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works in San Francisco County, when it may be appropriate, and what steps are typically involved. Whether a trustee needs to transfer specific property into trust records or a successor is addressing estate plan gaps after incapacity or death, understanding the petition process helps families avoid unnecessary delays and reduce the likelihood of litigation in a way that aligns with California trust and probate procedures.
The Heggstad petition procedure addresses situations where trust assets were never formally retitled or deeds and account registrations were not updated, but there is clear evidence the property was meant to be governed by the trust. This guide covers practical considerations, the typical court filings, the types of proof commonly accepted, and how petitions interact with other estate planning documents. Learning the basics before filing allows clients and trustees to present organized documentation and testimony that demonstrates the settlor’s intent and supports the requested transfer while minimizing contested proceedings.
A properly prepared Heggstad petition can prevent assets from being stuck in probate solely because title paperwork was not updated. This remedy benefits families by enabling a court to recognize the settlor’s intent and order transfer of the asset to the trust without full probate administration. It often reduces cost and delay compared with opening a full probate estate for the specific property. For trustees, it offers an orderly legal mechanism to confirm trust ownership and clear title, which allows for sale, transfer, or continued management of the property consistent with the settlor’s estate plan and the trust document terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on trust and estate matters for clients in the Bay Area, including Heggstad petitions and related trust administration tasks. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, supporting records, and transactions that show a settlor’s intention to include particular assets in a trust. We guide trustees and family members through the petition drafting and court process, assist with assembling proof such as deed transfers, trust schedules, and contemporaneous communications, and work to achieve an efficient resolution that secures clear title to the asset while respecting the settlor’s expressed wishes.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that specific property was always intended to be part of a trust even though title shows otherwise. This typically involves presenting evidence such as the trust document, deeds, account forms, beneficiary designations, or statements made by the settlor. The petition explains why the asset should be treated as trust property and requests an order directing the county recorder or other parties to reflect the trust’s ownership. Proper preparation and documentation form the core of a persuasive petition and reduce the risk of disputes during the court proceeding.
Filing a Heggstad petition is a judicial remedy available in California probate courts where the settlor’s intent can be shown without the need for full probate administration of the entire estate. The court evaluates evidence and may hold hearings where testimony and documentation are reviewed. Parties with competing claims receive notice and an opportunity to respond. When successful, the court issues an order that clarifies title and authorizes the trustee to act on the asset in accordance with the trust terms. Timely and organized presentation of facts is often decisive in reaching a favorable court determination.
A Heggstad petition is a petition filed in probate court to determine that an asset should be treated as a trust asset despite remaining in the settlor’s individual name. Courts look for evidence of intent such as the trust document itself, deed language, transfer-on-death designations, or other contemporaneous actions indicating the settlor meant the trust to control the property. This remedy is commonly used when administrative oversights prevented proper retitling, or when assets were inadvertently left out of trust schedules but were intended to be included, allowing trustees to complete their duties without unnecessary probate proceedings.
Successful petitions typically include a clear presentation of the trust instrument, evidence of the settlor’s intent, and proof of the relevant asset’s connection to the trust. Common documentary evidence includes copies of deeds, trust schedules, beneficiary designations, account statements, transfer documents, and correspondence. The process often requires drafting the petition, serving interested parties, filing with the probate court, and attending any required hearings. In some instances, the court may order additional evidence or may issue its decision after a brief contested hearing, depending on whether other parties object to the requested transfer.
A clear understanding of common legal terms helps trustees and family members follow the petition process. This section provides concise definitions of terms you will encounter, such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, title, deed, and petition. Each term is defined in practical terms with examples of how it applies to Heggstad filings. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to gather the right documentation, communicate with the court, and anticipate the steps needed to confirm trust ownership of contested or mis-titled assets.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it or intended to. In Heggstad proceedings, proving the settlor’s intent that a particular asset be governed by the trust is a central issue. Evidence can include the original trust document, amendments, letters, or transaction records showing the settlor’s efforts to fund the trust. When the settlor is deceased or incapacitated, testimony from witnesses and contemporaneous documents that reflect the settlor’s planning decisions are often relied upon to establish the necessary intent for the court.
The trustee is the individual or entity designated to manage the trust assets for the benefit of its beneficiaries, in accordance with the trust document. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trustee often files the petition to obtain a court order recognizing ownership of mis-titled property. The trustee must present evidence of the settlor’s intent and demonstrate the trust’s terms. Once the court issues an order, the trustee can take actions such as retitling property, selling it, or otherwise administering it according to the trust instrument.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries may be affected by a Heggstad petition because the court’s determination can change who controls or receives the property. Interested beneficiaries are typically notified of the petition and may have standing to object or submit evidence. Their rights are governed by the trust document and relevant California law, and the court considers beneficiary interests when evaluating whether the requested transfer aligns with the settlor’s intention and the trust terms.
A deed is the document that conveys ownership of real property, and title reflects the recorded ownership. When a deed remains in the settlor’s individual name rather than the trust, a Heggstad petition may be needed to have the court declare that the asset belongs to the trust. The petition commonly asks the court to order the county recorder or other entities to recognize the trust as the owner. Supporting documents such as the trust, past deeds, and transfer-related communications help demonstrate the intended ownership change.
When assets remain mis-titled, there are multiple legal paths: a Heggstad petition, opening a probate administration, or pursuing other corrective filings depending on asset type. A Heggstad petition can be quicker and more focused, addressing a specific asset without full probate. Probate administration covers the entire estate and may be necessary when multiple assets require distribution under intestacy or will. Other remedies, like corrective deeds or transfer-on-death designations, may suffice for certain assets. The right choice depends on the facts, the asset involved, and whether parties contest ownership or distribution.
A focused Heggstad petition is often appropriate when only one or a small number of assets remain in the settlor’s name but were clearly intended to be trust property. In such cases, a petition directed at those specific assets can avoid the broader expense and procedural burden of probate. The petition should include convincing, well-organized proof of intent and ownership, such as the trust instrument, related deeds or account forms, and any written or recorded statements indicating the settlor’s desire to fund the trust. This targeted approach can streamline court review and title correction.
When documentary evidence plainly supports trust ownership and no interested party contests the claim, the Heggstad petition route can be relatively straightforward. If the trust document and accompanying records demonstrate an intent to include the asset, and beneficiaries or heirs do not object, courts may issue orders without protracted litigation. This outcome requires careful preparation of filings and clear proof linking the asset to the trust. Avoiding disputes by providing thorough documentation facilitates the court’s ability to correct title in an efficient manner.
A comprehensive legal approach may be required when multiple assets are mis-titled, or when the estate involves complicated property ownership structures, business interests, or substantial creditor claims. In these scenarios, coordinated trust administration, potential estate administration steps, and additional filings may be necessary to resolve competing claims, protect beneficiary rights, and preserve asset value. Addressing these issues often involves a broader review of estate planning documents, potential amendments or trust modifications, and careful strategy to minimize disputes while complying with California probate and trust law.
When heirs, creditors, or other parties challenge the settlor’s intent or ownership assertions, a full suite of legal services may be necessary to respond to objections, gather evidentiary support, and present arguments in court. Such disputes can hinge on ambiguous documents, inconsistent records, or conflicting witness testimony. Addressing these matters often requires additional discovery, depositions, and litigation planning. A comprehensive approach helps ensure all procedural requirements are met and that the trustee or petitioner is prepared to address objections and protect the trust’s integrity.
A comprehensive approach to trust administration and corrective filings reduces the risk of future disputes by ensuring documentation is complete and consistent across assets. It may include reviewing and updating trust documents, retitling multiple assets, filing Heggstad petitions where appropriate, and coordinating with financial institutions and county recorders. Taking these steps can preserve the settlor’s intent, speed distribution where appropriate, and minimize potential litigation over ambiguous asset ownership. This forward-looking strategy often leads to clearer records and greater ease for trustees in carrying out their duties.
Comprehensive handling also supports beneficiaries by clarifying rights and timelines for distribution while addressing creditor or tax issues that could affect estate value. By proactively resolving mis-titled assets and coordinating the necessary legal filings, trustees can reduce administrative delays and help ensure assets are managed and transferred in accordance with the trust terms. Clear court orders and properly recorded documents provide a stronger title history, which can be critical when selling property or transferring accounts to beneficiaries under the trust.
One important benefit of a comprehensive process is achieving clear legal recognition of trust ownership, which reduces the risk of future disputes and facilitates straightforward administration. When a court order or properly recorded documents reflect trust ownership, trustees and beneficiaries can proceed with transactions such as sales or transfers with greater confidence. This clarity also helps when dealing with title companies, banks, and government agencies that require unambiguous documentation of ownership before completing transactions or releasing funds.
A coordinated approach addresses not only the immediate mis-titled asset but also systemic gaps in the estate plan that could cause future issues. By retitling accounts, updating beneficiary designations, and completing any necessary petitions or filings, trustees can reduce the likelihood of later court involvement. This proactive work decreases the administrative burden on trustees and beneficiaries, streamlines settlement or administration tasks, and helps preserve the settlor’s intentions for efficient distribution and management of assets in accordance with the trust document.
Begin by assembling all documents that illustrate the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Useful items include the original trust instrument, any amendments, deed copies, account statements showing attempted transfers, and written communications. Statements from witnesses who observed the settlor’s actions or heard the settlor’s expressed wishes can be helpful when paired with documentary proof. A well-organized packet that links each piece of evidence to the trust improves the clarity of the petition and supports a smoother court review process.
After obtaining a court order, coordinate promptly with county recorders, title companies, banks, and account custodians to ensure the order is properly recorded and the asset is retitled to the trust. Understand each institution’s requirements for accepting court orders or trust certifications, and provide certified copies and any supporting documents they require. Clear communication and prompt submission of the paperwork help prevent unnecessary follow-up delays and allow trustees to manage or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust terms.
If a significant asset was intended to be part of a trust but remains in the settlor’s individual name, a Heggstad petition can provide a focused remedy to transfer that asset into the trust without opening full probate for the entire estate. This approach may save time and expense when compared with probate administration, particularly for single-asset issues. Additionally, the petition clarifies title and reduces obstacles to selling or transferring the asset, allowing trustees to fulfill fiduciary duties and beneficiaries to receive distributions consistent with the settlor’s plan.
A Heggstad petition is also worth considering when immediate action is needed to manage or protect an asset, such as a home or investment account, and retitling is required to permit the trustee to act. Filing the petition helps ensure that the asset can be handled in keeping with the trust’s terms while providing notice to potentially interested parties. For families seeking a targeted remedy that aligns ownership with the settlor’s intent, the petition is a practical legal tool that addresses the common problem of incomplete trust funding.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include deeds that were never retitled after the trust was created, successor trustees encountering accounts still in the settlor’s name after incapacity or death, and cases where a settlor’s intent was expressed but paperwork was not completed. Other scenarios include transfers that were attempted but not recorded, or assets mistakenly omitted from trust schedules. Identifying these issues early and gathering supporting documentation helps streamline the filing and improve the prospects for a favorable court ruling.
When real property intended for the trust remains titled in the settlor’s name, the trustee may need a Heggstad petition to obtain a court declaration that the property belongs to the trust. Evidence could include the trust document, a deed with transfer language, and any statements or records showing intent to fund the trust. The petition process helps clear title so the trustee can manage, sell, or otherwise transfer the property in accordance with the trust terms and without opening a full probate estate for that asset alone.
Bank or brokerage accounts that were not properly retitled to the trust can impede a trustee’s ability to access funds. A Heggstad petition may resolve these issues when evidence supports the settlor’s intention to fund the trust. Supporting documents include account statements, beneficiary designations, trust schedules, or communications with financial institutions. Once the court recognizes the asset as trust property, institutions are typically able to facilitate transfers or retitling to allow the trustee to administer the funds in accordance with the trust provisions.
Occasionally, assets are overlooked during a trust funding process and remain in the settlor’s name despite clear planning intent. These oversights can occur with smaller accounts, retirement plan designations, or personal property that was not documented. Filing a Heggstad petition provides a legal mechanism to correct such omissions by demonstrating the settlor’s intention and asking the court to order transfer to the trust. This helps preserve the overall plan and reduce the need for less desirable remedies such as full probate.
Residents of Noe Valley and the broader San Francisco County area who face mis-titled assets can seek assistance to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is an appropriate remedy. We review trust instruments, deeds, and related records to advise on the best path forward, including whether a focused petition or broader estate administration is required. Our role includes preparing required court filings, coordinating service to interested parties, and helping clients understand the timeline, documentation needs, and potential outcomes of the petition process in local probate court.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings in-depth familiarity with California trust and probate procedures to Heggstad petitions and related corrective matters. We emphasize careful document assembly, clear presentation of evidence, and practical guidance for trustees and families navigating the court process. By focusing on organizing records and communicating the settlor’s intent clearly to the court and interested parties, we aim to resolve title issues efficiently while protecting beneficiary rights and preserving the settlor’s estate planning goals.
Clients receive assistance with drafting petitions, gathering and organizing supporting documents, preparing declarations, and meeting notice and filing requirements. We coordinate with county recorders and financial institutions to implement court orders once issued, helping to retitle property and complete administrative tasks needed for trust administration. Our approach balances attention to procedural detail with practical steps to finalize asset transfers and reduce the likelihood of post-judgment complications that could delay distribution or sale of property.
We also work to keep families informed at each stage of the process, clarifying legal options and likely timelines so trustees and beneficiaries can make informed decisions. From initial review through court proceedings and post-order implementation, the firm prioritizes transparent communication and thorough preparation. This helps clients understand what evidence will be persuasive, how to serve interested parties correctly, and what to expect when the court issues an order relating to trust ownership and title correction.
Our process begins with an initial document review to assess whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy. We identify necessary evidence, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and ensure accurate service to all interested parties according to California probate rules. If a hearing is required, we prepare witness declarations and exhibits. After a court order is obtained, we assist with recording and title updates and coordinate with financial institutions to implement the ruling. Throughout the process, we keep clients informed about filings, deadlines, and expected next steps.
The initial stage focuses on assessing the trust document and collecting evidence that connects the asset to the trust. We request copies of deeds, account statements, trust schedules, and any correspondence or transfer documents that reflect the settlor’s intent. Witness statements or affidavits may also be gathered to corroborate actions taken by the settlor. This preparatory work creates a clear evidentiary record that supports the petition and identifies any potential objections or additional steps needed before filing in probate court.
During document review, we examine the trust instrument, amendments, deeds, and related account paperwork to determine the strongest evidence of intent. This analysis helps shape the petition and identify any gaps that might need supplemental documentation or witness statements. We also review beneficiary designations, recorded transfers, and any prior communications with financial institutions. The goal is to build a coherent narrative that ties the asset to the settlor’s planning choices and supports a focused petition to correct title in the probate court.
We prepare declarations from the trustee and any relevant witnesses, attach copies of key documents, and compile exhibits to present a concise and persuasive record to the court. Clear labeling and cross-referencing of exhibits with the petition help the court and other parties understand the connections between the asset and the trust. Accurate, well-organized supporting materials reduce the potential for procedural objections and streamline the court’s ability to evaluate the settlor’s intent and issue an order recognizing trust ownership.
Once the petition and supporting materials are complete, we file them with the appropriate probate court and arrange for service on all required parties. Proper service is essential to ensure the court has jurisdiction and that interested parties have notice and an opportunity to respond. We prepare proof of service and track deadlines for responses. If objections arise, we evaluate possible resolutions or prepare to address them at hearing. Careful adherence to filing and service rules helps prevent procedural delays that can extend the matter.
California rules require that heirs, beneficiaries, and certain other parties receive notice of probate petitions. We identify who must be served, prepare required notices, and ensure proper proof of service is filed with the court. Timely and correct service protects the integrity of the process and reduces the chance of later challenges based on inadequate notice. If parties are difficult to locate, we discuss options for substituted service or other lawful methods to provide notice under court rules.
If an interested party objects or the court requests additional evidence, we respond with supplemental documentation, declarations, or legal argument as needed. Sometimes objections can be resolved through discussion and document exchange, while other times a hearing will be necessary. Preparing thorough responses and being ready to explain the factual basis for the petition helps the court understand why the asset should be treated as trust property. This stage requires careful attention to evidentiary rules and procedural timelines to preserve the petition’s momentum.
After the court issues an order recognizing the asset as part of the trust, we assist with implementing the order by coordinating with recorders, title companies, or financial institutions to retitle property. We provide certified copies of the order and any required supporting affidavits or certifications of trust. Ensuring the order is properly recorded and accepted by institutions completes the transfer process and allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms, bringing the matter to a practical and legal conclusion.
Once the court order is obtained, recording it with the county recorder or presenting it to financial institutions enables retitling. Different jurisdictions and institutions have specific requirements for accepting court orders, so we handle coordination to ensure compliance. After recording and retitling, the trustee can perform transactions such as selling the property or transferring accounts to beneficiaries in accordance with the trust. Proper implementation safeguards title and ensures the settlor’s plan is followed.
Following retitling, the trustee completes any administrative tasks required by the trust, including requested accounting to beneficiaries, transferring funds, or selling assets if authorized. We assist trustees in documenting actions taken under the court order and ensuring distributions follow the trust’s directives. This final phase aims to close the loop on the mis-titled asset and provide beneficiaries with clarity about what was done and why, while maintaining proper records of the steps taken to implement the court’s decision.
Courts typically weigh several types of evidence when evaluating a Heggstad petition, including the trust document and any amendments, copies of deeds or title records, account statements showing attempted transfers, and contemporaneous written communications that indicate the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Declarations from the trustee or witnesses who observed the settlor’s actions or heard the settlor express intent can bolster documentary proof. The court looks for a coherent factual record that connects the asset to the trust in a way that demonstrates the settlor’s planning choices. Clear, organized exhibits and cross-referenced documents help the court understand the sequence of transactions and the settlor’s intent. In some cases, the absence of a single definitive document can be overcome by multiple corroborating items that together paint a convincing picture. Preparing a thorough evidentiary package and responding to any court requests for additional proof increases the likelihood of a smooth resolution without unnecessary delays.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, whether interested parties contest the petition, and how quickly supporting documentation can be gathered. In uncontested cases where evidence is clear and all parties are properly served, the process can be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on local calendar and procedural requirements. When objections arise or additional evidentiary steps are needed, the matter can take longer due to hearings, discovery, or briefing. Local probate court workloads and the need for supplemental documents also influence timing. Advance preparation of exhibits, accurate notice to interested parties, and cooperative communications with institutions that must retitle property after the order can shorten the overall timeline. We work to identify potential delays early and keep clients informed about expected steps and scheduling in San Francisco County courts.
Yes. California probate rules require that heirs, beneficiaries, and certain other interested parties receive notice when a petition is filed. Proper notice provides these parties the opportunity to object, request additional information, or participate in the court proceeding. Serving the correct parties and filing proof of service is a procedural requirement that helps ensure the court has jurisdiction and that any objections can be addressed during the process. Notices are typically prepared to include relevant details about the petition and the scheduled hearing, if any. Ensuring accurate service and timely proof of service reduces the risk of later procedural challenges. If a party cannot be located, the court may permit substituted service methods under specified rules, which we can advise on during case preparation.
A Heggstad petition can be applied to bank and brokerage accounts when evidence shows the settlor intended to fund the trust with those accounts but title remained in the settlor’s name. Documentation may include account statements, beneficiary designations, or communications with the financial institution indicating a transfer was intended. The petition asks the court to declare the trust’s ownership so institutions will recognize the trustee’s authority and retitle the account accordingly. Financial institutions often have specific procedures and documentation requirements for retitling accounts after a court order. After the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, the trustee typically presents certified copies of the order and any required certifications of trust to the institution to facilitate retitling or transfer in accordance with the trust terms.
If someone objects to the petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a hearing to evaluate evidence and testimony. Objections often raise questions about the settlor’s intent, competing ownership claims, or procedural defects such as inadequate notice. Addressing objections may involve producing additional documentation, supplying witness declarations, or engaging in negotiated resolution where possible, but some contested matters proceed to hearings where the court makes a determination based on the record presented. Preparing to respond to objections requires attention to evidentiary details and procedural rules. Demonstrating a clear chain of documentation tying the asset to the trust and showing proper service of notice are important steps in countering objections. If litigation is necessary, the court’s focus will be on the strength of the evidence and whether the settlor’s intent is sufficiently established under applicable law.
A Heggstad petition is distinct from opening a full probate administration. It is a targeted court action seeking a declaration that a specific asset should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the settlor’s name. Probate administration, by contrast, involves the court-supervised process for settling a decedent’s entire estate when the estate must be administered under the will or intestacy rules. A Heggstad petition addresses a discrete title issue without necessarily invoking full probate procedures for the whole estate. Choosing between a petition and probate depends on the number and nature of assets, the strength of supporting documentation, and whether parties dispute ownership. When a single asset is at issue and evidence of intent is strong, a Heggstad petition can be an efficient alternative to probate. If broader estate administration needs exist, probate may be appropriate, and we can advise on which path best fits the circumstances.
Original trust documents are helpful but not always required if reliable copies and other corroborating records are available. Courts typically accept authenticated copies of trust instruments and supporting documents, and declarations can explain the absence of originals when necessary. Supplemental evidence such as deeds, account statements, emails, letters, and witness declarations can fill evidentiary gaps and demonstrate intent. The key is assembling a consistent, well-supported record that links the asset with the trust’s purpose and language. When originals cannot be produced, we explain alternatives and help prepare convincing declarations that describe where originals were kept, any attempts to locate them, and how the copies offered reflect the trust’s actual terms. Providing multiple corroborating sources increases the persuasive weight of the petition even when originals are unavailable.
Yes. Once the court issues an order recognizing the property as part of the trust and the title is retitled accordingly, a trustee may sell the property if the trust instrument grants that authority. The trustee must follow fiduciary duties and any procedural requirements in the trust, including providing notice to beneficiaries if required and ensuring the sale is in the trust’s best interest. Proper retitling and documentation help facilitate a sale through title companies and lenders by providing clear evidence of the trustee’s authority to convey the property. Trustee actions after retitling should be documented carefully, including any accounting or disclosures required by the trust, to maintain transparency with beneficiaries. Compliance with the trust terms and applicable legal duties ensures that subsequent transactions are valid and reduces the likelihood of challenges to the trustee’s authority or the sale itself.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include corrective deeds, beneficiary designation updates, transfer-on-death forms, or informal agreements in uncontested situations. For certain assets, administrative fixes such as completing a corrective deed or updating account registration may be sufficient without court involvement. The appropriate alternative depends on the asset type, whether the settlor is alive and able to complete corrective steps, and whether other parties consent to the change in ownership or registration. When parties cannot agree or when the title issue affects third parties such as banks or title companies, a petition may still be the most reliable route. We evaluate alternatives on a case-by-case basis to determine whether administrative solutions can achieve the desired outcome or whether a court order is the best means to secure clear title and ensure the trustee can act.
Before meeting with a lawyer, gather any trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, correspondence regarding transfers, and notes about conversations with financial institutions. Having these materials available at the outset accelerates the assessment and helps identify the strongest evidence supporting a Heggstad petition. Also prepare a timeline of relevant events, such as when the trust was created, attempted funding steps, and any changes to property ownership or account registrations. Providing contact information for known beneficiaries, heirs, and financial institutions involved with the asset is also helpful. This allows the attorney to evaluate notice requirements and identify potential parties who must be served. Being organized and bringing complete documentation enables a more productive initial consultation and clearer guidance about next steps.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas