A Heggstad petition is a legal tool used when trust administration encounters assets that were intended to be held in a trust but were never retitled before a person died. In Parkside and throughout San Francisco County, families often discover bank accounts, deeds, or brokerage accounts that still bear the decedent’s name alone. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that those assets were effectively part of the trust despite the missing paperwork, allowing them to be administered according to the trust terms. The process protects beneficiaries’ interests and helps avoid lengthy probate when handled carefully by experienced estate planning counsel.
When a loved one’s assets were meant to be in a revocable living trust but were not formally transferred, a Heggstad petition can bridge the gap. This remedy depends on demonstrating the decedent’s intent that the asset be held in the trust, typically through trust documents, statements, or other corroborating evidence. The petition provides a court-approved mechanism to treat the asset as trust property, which promotes orderly administration and distribution. In many situations, pursuing a Heggstad petition can save time, reduce costs, and minimize disputes among heirs by clarifying property ownership under California law.
A Heggstad petition is important because it resolves the mismatch between a decedent’s documented estate plan and the assets actually titled at death. By securing a court determination that certain assets were meant to be part of the trust, beneficiaries can avoid full probate for those items and ensure distributions follow the settlor’s wishes. The petition can simplify trust administration, reduce the risk of creditor or beneficiary challenges, and facilitate timely transfer of assets to designated beneficiaries. Proper preparation and supporting evidence are essential, since the court evaluates intent and surrounding circumstances to reach its decision.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist families in Parkside and across San Francisco County with estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. Our approach focuses on clear communication, careful document review, and practical problem solving to resolve title irregularities and protect beneficiaries’ interests. We help gather the necessary evidence, draft pleadings, and navigate local court procedures while keeping clients informed at every step. Clients rely on our thorough preparation and steady representation to reduce delays and manage potential disputes related to untransferred assets.
A Heggstad petition asks a California probate court to treat certain assets as trust property even though legal title was never changed before the settlor’s death. This remedy arises when a decedent clearly intended assets to fund a trust but procedural steps were not completed. The court examines trust instruments, account records, correspondence, and other evidence showing intent. If the court is persuaded, it can order that the assets be administered under the trust, which streamlines distribution and can avoid full probate proceedings for those items. This process protects beneficiaries and advances the decedent’s estate plan.
The functional goal of a Heggstad petition is to correct a title discrepancy so assets are distributed according to the trust. Not every case qualifies: the petitioner must present persuasive proof that the owner intended the trust to control the asset. Evidence may include draft or executed trust documents, beneficiary designations, trust funding instructions, or testimony regarding the decedent’s planning steps. Courts weigh the totality of circumstances, and the petition typically requires careful factual presentation and support from knowledgeable counsel familiar with probate practice and local court expectations in San Francisco County.
A Heggstad petition is a procedural request filed in probate court to recognize that an asset, though legally titled in the decedent’s name alone, should be treated as if it had been transferred into the decedent’s trust. The petition must show sufficient evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust and that the failure to retitle was an oversight or administrative omission. Success means the court orders the asset to be administered according to the trust’s terms, enabling distribution to beneficiaries without the delays and costs of ancillary probate on that asset. The remedy supports faithful execution of estate plans.
When evaluating a Heggstad petition, courts focus on demonstrating the decedent’s intent that the trust control the asset. Relevant elements include the trust agreement itself, any documentation directing funding of the trust, account records showing trust-related activity, and testimony or declarations addressing intent and circumstances. The process typically involves compiling these materials, preparing a petition with factual declarations, serving interested parties, and presenting the matter to the court. Timely and organized preparation of evidence increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and helps resolve title problems efficiently.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petition matters helps trustees, beneficiaries, and fiduciaries communicate clearly during administration. Terms such as trust funding, settlor intent, probate assets, nonprobate transfer, and declaration of trust are commonly referenced. Familiarity with these concepts aids in locating the right documents and framing the petition for the court. Clear use of language and careful gathering of supporting records strengthen the factual presentation required to have assets recognized as part of the trust and to avoid unnecessary delays during trust administration.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into the name of a trust so the trust becomes the legal owner. Funding can involve changing titles on real property, retitling bank and brokerage accounts, updating beneficiary designations, or assigning interests to the trust. Proper funding ensures the trust functions as intended and reduces the need for court intervention after the settlor’s death. When assets were not fully funded, a Heggstad petition can be used to show that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust despite the missing formal retitling steps.
Settlor intent describes the deceased person’s demonstrated plan or desire for assets to be managed or distributed according to the trust document. In Heggstad proceedings, proving settlor intent is central; courts look for written instructions, consistent estate planning steps, or other evidence that the settlor meant the trust to control particular property. Statements, draft documents, and consistent estate planning behavior can all support a finding of intent. The clearer the documentary and testimonial record, the more persuasive the case for treating the asset as trust property.
Probate assets are those that pass under the decedent’s will or by intestacy and typically require court administration to distribute. Nonprobate assets pass outside probate through mechanisms such as trusts, beneficiary designations, or joint tenancy. A Heggstad petition seeks to reclassify an asset from probate to nonprobate status by showing it was intended to be held in the trust. This reclassification can reduce the assets subject to probate administration and allow trust distribution procedures to apply instead, simplifying settlement for beneficiaries.
A declaration or affidavit is a written statement made under penalty of perjury that provides factual support for a petition. In Heggstad cases, declarations from the trustee, family members, or the preparer of estate planning documents can explain the settlor’s intent and the circumstances of any untitled assets. Declarations should be clear, specific, and supported by documentary evidence where possible. Courts rely on these sworn statements to evaluate the totality of circumstances and to determine whether the asset should be treated as part of the trust.
When assets are discovered in the decedent’s name, families face choices: initiate probate administration, pursue a Heggstad petition to have assets treated as trust property, or negotiate informal transfers with institutions and beneficiaries. Probate can be time-consuming and costly, while a Heggstad petition targets specific assets and aims to avoid full probate for those items. Informal solutions may work when institutions accept trust documentation, but many institutions require a court order for transfer. Choosing the right path depends on the asset type, available evidence of intent, potential disputes, and the parties’ willingness to cooperate.
A limited approach can be effective when the untransferred assets are modest in value or when the institution holding the account will accept trust documents without a court order. For example, small bank accounts or transfer-on-death arrangements may often be resolved through documentation and institution-specific procedures. In these situations, the trustee can present the trust and supporting records to the institution to request retitling or transfer, reducing time and expense compared with court filings. Careful documentation and patient communication with account holders are key to success.
When there is clear, contemporaneous written evidence showing the decedent intended assets to be in the trust, a brief administrative approach can sometimes resolve matters. Written instructions, trust funding checklists, or signed transfer forms can persuade custodians to accept documentation and retitle accounts without a court order. Where the evidence is compelling and interested parties are cooperative, trustees may be able to accomplish transfers directly with financial institutions. This path depends on the institution’s policies and the strength of the documentary record supporting the settlor’s intent.
Comprehensive legal action is often required when financial institutions refuse to transfer assets without a court order or when records are ambiguous and competing claims arise. In such circumstances, filing a Heggstad petition provides a formal judicial determination that clarifies ownership and authority for trustees. The court review process resolves contested issues and creates an enforceable order directing distribution according to the trust. Pursuing a petition in these cases helps prevent unresolved disputes from stalling administration and provides legal certainty for fiduciaries and beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries disagree about asset ownership or when potential creditor claims complicate transfer, a Heggstad petition may be the most reliable path to resolution. Court involvement ensures all interested parties receive notice and have an opportunity to be heard, reducing the risk of later challenges to distributions. Judicial orders provide clear authority for trustees to move forward with administration and help protect trustees against personal liability for transfers made in reliance on the court’s decision. This safeguards both fiduciaries and beneficiaries during settlement.
A comprehensive approach through a Heggstad petition delivers legal certainty where other routes are insufficient. A court order confirming that an asset belongs to the trust eliminates ambiguity, permits prompt distribution according to the trust, and can protect trustees from future challenges. The judicial process also ensures that notice requirements are met and that all interested parties have an opportunity to contest. While court proceedings involve time and expense, they can ultimately reduce overall delay and risk by producing a definitive ruling on property status.
Another benefit of pursuing a formal petition is the ability to resolve multiple title issues in a single proceeding, streamlining administration for complex estates. Courts can address disputes, confirm trustee authority, and authorize necessary transfers in one matter, avoiding piecemeal litigation. This coordinated resolution helps trustees fulfill fiduciary duties and provides beneficiaries with a clear path to receiving distributions. When documentation is incomplete or contested, the court’s oversight brings finality to the trust administration process and supports orderly asset transfer.
Court orders issued after a Heggstad petition provide trustees with legal certainty to move forward without fear of later successful challenges to transfers. This protection is particularly valuable when dealing with institutions or potential claimants who require judicial confirmation of ownership. By documenting the basis for treating assets as trust property, the court’s decision helps shield trustees from liability and enables them to distribute assets as the trust prescribes. The resulting clarity benefits all parties and supports efficient estate settlement.
When title issues are disputed or when documentation is incomplete, a Heggstad petition centralizes resolution, allowing the court to evaluate the evidence and make a binding decision. This avoids prolonged negotiations and reduces the likelihood of subsequent litigation. For beneficiaries and trustees managing sizable or varied assets, the ability to resolve multiple issues in a single proceeding promotes administrative efficiency. The judicial determination also creates a clear record that supports final distribution according to the trust’s terms.
When preparing a Heggstad petition, focus on assembling contemporaneous documents that reflect the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This may include the signed trust instrument, draft estate planning notes, beneficiary designation forms, bank statements showing trust-related transactions, and any correspondence discussing funding. Clear, organized documents make the factual presentation more persuasive and reduce the court’s need for extended factual inquiry. Presenting a coherent, well-documented record is often the most effective way to achieve a favorable outcome without unnecessary delays.
Provide interested parties with clear notice of the planned petition and invite cooperation to resolve ownership questions without contested litigation. Giving beneficiaries, heirs, and potential claimants an opportunity to review documents and raise concerns can reduce surprise and minimize disputes. Where parties are cooperative, informal resolution or stipulated orders can follow, avoiding contested hearings. If disputes arise, having already shared the record and attempted to collaborate supports a more streamlined court presentation and demonstrates the trustee’s good-faith efforts to administer the estate responsibly.
Consider a Heggstad petition whenever assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name, creating a gap between the estate plan and asset records. Common triggers include recently executed trusts where funding steps were incomplete, real property deeds that were never retitled, or brokerage and bank accounts that were not assigned to the trust. Filing a petition can transfer specific assets into trust administration, help avoid full probate for those items, and permit distributions according to the settlor’s intentions. The decision should be guided by the asset types, available evidence, and potential for dispute.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to protect trustees when institutions demand a court order to release funds or titles. A judicial order confirms trustee authority and reduces the risk of later claims against distributions. Families facing unexpected title issues after a loved one’s death benefit from clear legal direction on how to proceed. While alternative administrative routes may exist, a petition provides finality and legal standing when documentation is lacking or when multiple parties assert competing interests in the asset at issue.
Heggstad petitions commonly arise in circumstances where a trust was prepared but not fully funded before death, when a trustee discovers assets titled in the decedent’s name, or when institutions refuse to accept trust documentation. Other triggers include transfers intended but not completed, drafts indicating intent to fund the trust, or assets added shortly before death without time for retitling. These scenarios can create administrative hurdles that a Heggstad petition is designed to overcome by providing a court determination that the asset should be treated as trust property.
Often family members discover that bank or brokerage accounts meant to be held in trust remain in the decedent’s name. Such accounts can impede distribution plans and lead to institutional holds or freezes. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare these accounts trust property based on the decedent’s intent, supported by account histories, trust documents, and related communications. Resolving these accounts through a petition can permit trustees to access funds for trust administration and distribution without initiating full probate for each account.
Residential or investment property that was intended to be transferred to a revocable trust but never retitled presents a common challenge. Deeds or county records may still show the decedent as the owner, and lenders or title companies often require a court order before recognizing trust ownership. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the property part of the trust, enabling the trustee to manage or transfer the property according to the trust’s terms and helping avoid the expense and delay of full probate on the real property.
When a trust was created shortly before death, there may not have been time to complete funding steps for all assets. This type of timing issue frequently results in assets remaining titled in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition addresses this gap by presenting evidence of the decedent’s intent to include those assets in the trust. Courts can then order that the assets be treated as trust property, allowing the trust’s distribution instructions to be followed and enabling the trustee to settle the estate in accordance with the settlor’s documented plan.
We assist clients in Parkside and throughout San Francisco County with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. Our team helps locate and organize necessary documents, draft the petition and supporting declarations, coordinate required service on interested parties, and represent trustees in hearings if needed. We aim to minimize delays and clarify ownership issues so trustees can administer trusts efficiently. If financial institutions or title companies require a judicial order, we manage the filings and court process to obtain the necessary determination that assets should be treated as trust property.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide practical, detail-focused representation for Heggstad petitions and trust administration tasks. We focus on thorough document review and clear legal filings tailored to the local probate rules in San Francisco County. When assets were not retitled before death, our goal is to assemble persuasive evidence, communicate effectively with institutions, and seek timely court action when required. Clients appreciate our patient, responsive approach to resolving title issues and helping trustees meet their obligations while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Our team helps trustees and families understand the options available and explains the benefits and trade-offs of informal resolution versus filing a petition. We prepare the necessary pleadings, declarations, and exhibits to present a coherent case that supports treating assets as trust property. Throughout the process, we strive to reduce surprises, maintain open communication, and pursue cost-effective solutions. Where court proceedings are necessary, we provide steady representation focused on obtaining a clear judicial determination that allows trust administration to proceed.
We serve residents of Parkside and neighboring communities, guiding clients through local court procedures and deadlines. Our practice emphasizes practical results and clear next steps for trustees faced with untitled assets. Whether the matter can be resolved administratively with an institution or requires a court petition, we help clients choose the approach that best balances speed, cost, and legal protection. Our goal is to resolve title issues so trust distributions follow the settlor’s documented wishes and the administration concludes efficiently.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust documents, account records, deeds, and any notes indicating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. We identify the assets at issue, determine which institutions require a court order, and evaluate whether informal transfer is possible. If a petition is needed, we draft the pleadings and declarations, coordinate service to interested parties, and file with the probate court. We keep clients informed at each stage and work to obtain a timely judicial determination so trustee administration can proceed.
The first step is assembling all relevant paperwork and assessing the strength of the factual record showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. This includes the trust instrument, banking and brokerage statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and any correspondence or notes. We evaluate whether institutions may accept these materials administratively or whether a court petition is necessary. A thorough assessment at the outset leads to a targeted plan for resolution, whether by institution-level transfer or by filing a Heggstad petition in probate court.
We help identify and gather the trust agreement, amendments, and any related estate planning documents, along with account statements and title paperwork that relate to the assets in question. Documentation showing the settlor’s planning steps or funding instructions strengthens the petition. Organized records and clear timelines make it easier to demonstrate intent and show the court or institution why the asset should be treated as trust property. Our team assists clients in locating these materials and preparing them for submission.
We contact banks, brokerage firms, title insurers, and other custodians to determine their specific requirements for transferring assets to a trust. Some institutions will accept trust documents and a few supporting items, while others require a court order. Understanding these requirements early helps us decide whether a petition is necessary and prevents wasted effort. This assessment also informs the content of the petition and the evidence we will emphasize when presenting the case to the court.
If a petition is needed, we prepare the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations that present a clear factual narrative and documentary proof of the settlor’s intent. The petition outlines the assets at issue, the factual basis for treating them as trust property, and the relief requested. We ensure proper service on interested parties and follow local court formatting and filing procedures. Meticulous preparation minimizes the likelihood of procedural setbacks and positions the case for a prompt hearing and judicial determination.
Our drafting emphasizes clarity and organization: a concise statement of facts, clear identification of the assets, and supporting exhibits such as account statements and excerpts from the trust. Declarations from trustees or witnesses explain the context and document the settlor’s intent. This focused presentation helps the court evaluate whether the asset should be treated as part of the trust, and helps reduce the need for extended evidentiary proceedings or additional discovery.
After the petition and exhibits are compiled, we file the matter with the probate court serving the decedent’s county and arrange for appropriate notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and potential claimants. Proper service and notice are essential to the court’s ability to consider the petition and to protect the procedural rights of interested parties. We monitor filing deadlines, respond to any procedural questions, and prepare for the hearing to present the matter effectively to the judge if opposition arises.
Following filing and service, the court schedules a hearing if required. At the hearing, the court reviews the record and any objections, then decides whether to order the asset treated as trust property. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that institutions and title companies can rely upon to retitle or transfer the assets to the trustee. We assist with submitting the order to institutions and completing the administrative steps necessary for transfer and subsequent trust administration.
We represent the trustee at any required hearing, present the documentary record, and respond to questions or objections from other parties. The goal is to secure an order that expressly recognizes the asset as trust property based on the evidence of intent. When objections are raised, we address them with focused legal and factual arguments and seek clarification from the court as needed. Our advocacy aims to achieve a clear, enforceable order that institutions will accept for transfer.
After the court issues an order, we help trustees submit the order to banks, title companies, and other institutions to effectuate the necessary retitling or distribution. We confirm that the transfers comply with the court order and the trust’s terms, and we address any remaining administrative steps to complete trust administration. This follow-through ensures that the judicial resolution results in practical transfer of assets so beneficiaries can receive distributions in accordance with the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in probate court asking the judge to treat certain assets as if they had been transferred into a trust, even though formal retitling was not completed before the decedent’s death. This procedure is used when documents and other evidence indicate the decedent intended the asset to be trust property, but title records still show the decedent as the owner. The petition explains the facts, presents supporting exhibits, and asks the court to issue an order recognizing the asset as part of the trust. It is typically used to avoid full probate for specific assets and to allow the trustee to administer those assets under the trust’s terms. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence, such as trust documents, account statements, and declarations, to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. When successful, the order gives institutions and title companies the authority they need to transfer or retitle assets to the trustee.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the completeness of the supporting documentation, and the local court’s calendar. Simple, uncontested matters with clear documentary support can be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months from filing to order. More complicated or contested cases, those requiring additional discovery or witness testimony, can take longer. Preparation time also affects the schedule, since compiling records and declarations is an important early step. Courts in San Francisco County set hearing dates according to their dockets and procedural timelines. After filing and serving interested parties, a hearing is scheduled and the court reviews the record and any objections. Expect communication with the court and potential back-and-forth to address questions or requests for additional documentation. Working with legal counsel helps anticipate issues that can delay the process and supports a more efficient path to resolution.
Courts typically look for clear evidence of the decedent’s intent to have the asset held in the trust. Useful evidence includes the trust instrument and any amendments, written instructions or checklists indicating funding intent, bank or brokerage statements showing transactions linked to the trust, and contemporaneous correspondence referencing the trust funding plan. Declarations from trustees, family members, or the document preparer can provide factual context about the settlor’s actions and intentions. The court evaluates the totality of circumstances, not a single item of proof. Consistency among documents, timelines showing planning steps, and corroborating testimony strengthen the petition. Where documentary evidence is limited, credible declarations and witness statements may compensate, but the clearer and more direct the evidence, the more persuasive the petition will be to the judge considering whether to treat the asset as trust property.
Trustees sometimes can transfer assets administratively if financial institutions or title companies will accept trust documentation and supporting records without a court order. This often works for straightforward bank or brokerage accounts where the institution’s policies permit retitling on presentation of the trust and related paperwork. Communication with the institution and careful presentation of the trust documents can result in voluntary transfers without court involvement. However, many institutions will not transfer significant assets or real property without a judicial order, especially when records are ambiguous or when multiple parties assert competing claims. In those situations, attempting administrative transfers without a court order can expose trustees to liability. When institutions insist on a court order or potential disputes exist, filing a Heggstad petition is the safer path to secure clear authority for transfers.
Filing a Heggstad petition seeks a court determination about specific assets and does not necessarily open a full probate estate. The petition asks the court to treat particular assets as trust property, which may allow those items to be administered outside probate under the trust. Courts will consider the petition on its merits and may issue an order regarding the assets at issue without appointing a personal representative or initiating full probate administration, depending on the case circumstances. That said, if the petition raises broader estate issues or if claims against the decedent’s assets emerge, additional proceedings could follow. Courts handle Heggstad matters with attention to notice and due process for interested parties, and the outcome typically clarifies whether probate is necessary for other portions of the estate. Careful case assessment helps determine the likelihood that filing will lead to limited relief versus a larger probate matter.
If beneficiaries object to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider their arguments and any evidence they present. Objections may challenge the sufficiency of the evidence of intent, dispute the trustee’s characterization of the asset, or raise competing claims. The court may schedule a contested hearing to hear testimony, review additional exhibits, and evaluate the credibility of declarations. If the objections have merit, the court may deny the petition or require further proof before issuing an order. Representing trustees and interested parties, legal counsel assists in addressing objections by clarifying the factual record, presenting additional documentation, and making legal arguments that support treating the asset as trust property. In many cases, mediation or negotiation among parties can resolve disputes without a protracted court battle, but when disputes persist the court’s adjudication provides a final resolution.
When a court grants a Heggstad petition and issues an order declaring the asset to be trust property, financial institutions and title companies typically accept that order as authority to retitle or transfer the asset. Courts craft orders to be clear and directive so custodians can rely on them for administrative processing. Institutions often have established procedures for accepting court orders and updating their records accordingly. In rare cases, additional documentation or clarification may be requested by the institution. When that occurs, counsel can coordinate the submission of the court order, certified copies, or any supplementary affidavits the institution requires. The court’s order is the principal instrument that enables trustees to obtain the transfers necessary to carry out the trust administration.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include attempting administrative transfers directly with financial institutions, using transfer-on-death or payable-on-death mechanisms where available, or negotiating settlements among beneficiaries. If account custodians accept trust documents and supporting evidence, assets can sometimes be retitled without court involvement. For small or uncontested matters, this administrative route can be quicker and less costly than court proceedings. However, these alternatives depend on institutional policies and the clarity of the documentary record. Where institutions refuse to act or where disputes exist, the alternatives may not be effective. A Heggstad petition remains the reliable path to obtain a judicial determination when administrative measures fail or when parties seek the legal certainty that a court order provides.
Costs associated with a Heggstad petition typically include court filing fees, service costs, and attorney fees for preparation and representation. Who ultimately pays depends on the trust terms and the outcome: trustees may advance costs for administration, and sometimes the court allows reimbursement from the trust or estate if the petition is granted and charges are appropriate. The trustee has a duty to act prudently in incurring expenses and should document why the costs are necessary for proper administration. Parties often weigh the expected cost of a petition against the potential benefits, such as avoiding probate expense, securing clear title, and preventing future disputes. Counsel can provide guidance on likely costs and estimate the timeline so trustees and beneficiaries can make informed decisions about proceeding with a petition versus pursuing administrative solutions.
To begin the process, gather the trust document, any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any written notes reflecting the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Document any communications with financial institutions and note which assets remain titled in the decedent’s name. This collection helps evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and which assets to include. Next, contact legal counsel experienced in trust administration and probate practice in San Francisco County to review the papers and advise on the best path forward. Counsel will assess whether the evidence supports filing a petition, whether institutions might accept administrative documentation, and what notices or filings will be required. Early legal guidance helps streamline preparation and supports an efficient resolution tailored to the particular circumstances.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas