A Trust Modification Petition can help families and trustees in Visitacion Valley address changed circumstances that make the original trust terms impractical or inconsistent with the settlor’s current intentions. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist clients across San Francisco County with clear guidance on when a court petition is appropriate, how the process typically unfolds, and what outcomes are possible. This page explains the fundamentals of trust modification petitions, outlines common reasons for seeking court approval, and offers practical steps to protect assets and beneficiaries while preserving intent.
Trust modification petitions are often used when a trust’s language no longer reflects the settlor’s situation or when unexpected legal or tax issues arise. Whether you are a trustee facing administrative obstacles, a beneficiary concerned about distributions, or a family member exploring options after changes in finances or health, knowing the legal framework is essential. This guide covers procedural requirements, likely timelines, documentation you should gather, and how careful planning prevents disputes, delays, and unintended consequences with trust administration and related estate planning instruments.
Filing a trust modification petition can resolve inconsistencies, correct drafting errors, and adapt a trust to new factual or legal circumstances without undoing the settlor’s essential intent. This remedy benefits trustees by removing administrative roadblocks, protects beneficiaries by clarifying distribution terms, and preserves estate plans by aligning trust documents with the settlor’s current objectives. When handled through the court, a modification becomes enforceable, reducing the risk of future litigation. Thoughtful handling of a petition minimizes tax exposure and ensures successor fiduciaries can carry out their duties with confidence and legal authority.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in San Jose, Visitacion Valley, and throughout California with a focus on estate planning and trust matters. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, a clear explanation of available remedies, and pragmatic representation in court when a trust modification petition is needed. We work closely with clients to evaluate options, prepare persuasive petitions, and coordinate related estate planning updates such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and trust certifications. Our goal is to deliver practical legal solutions that protect assets and honor the settlor’s wishes while minimizing conflict among family members.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate or superior court to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances make the original provisions impracticable, impossible, or inconsistent with the settlor’s intent. Reasons may include changes in tax law, the settlor’s incapacity, newly discovered assets, or errors in drafting that produce unintended results. The court evaluates whether a modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and whether the proposed change serves the beneficiaries’ best interests. Proper preparation and supporting documentation increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and a clear court order.
Not every trust problem requires a petition; some changes can be made through trust amendments or decanting by the trustee if the trust documents and state law permit it. When unilateral changes are not authorized or disputes arise among interested parties, a petition provides judicial authority to implement necessary corrections. The petition process typically includes notice to beneficiaries, presentation of evidence supporting the modification, and a hearing where the court weighs competing interests. Understanding procedural requirements and likely timelines helps trustees and families manage expectations and prepare for each step.
A trust modification petition asks the court to alter existing trust provisions, either temporarily or permanently, to reflect changed circumstances or to correct mistakes. The petition must explain the grounds for modification, provide factual support, and identify interested parties entitled to notice. Courts will consider whether changing the trust is consistent with the settlor’s intent and whether beneficiaries’ rights will be protected. The process creates a clear, enforceable judicial order that clarifies fiduciary duties and distribution rules, helping trustees carry out administration without ongoing uncertainty or conflict.
Preparing a successful petition requires precise drafting, supporting evidence, and adherence to notice rules. Essential elements include a clear statement of the trust’s original language, the factual changes prompting the request, affidavits or declarations from knowledgeable parties, and a proposed order reflecting the requested changes. The court may require mediation or additional hearings to resolve disputes. After a judicial ruling, the trustee must implement the order and, where appropriate, record documents like a Certification of Trust to reflect the updated authority and protect third parties dealing with trust assets.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and participate effectively. This section defines roles such as settlor, trustee, and beneficiary, and explains procedures like decanting, pour-over wills, and filing petitions. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to gather the right documentation, evaluate proposed changes, and respond when notice of a petition is served. Clear definitions reduce confusion and help families make informed choices about preserving assets, protecting beneficiaries, and updating related estate planning documents.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s intent, as expressed in the trust document and surrounding circumstances, guides whether a court will approve a proposed modification. When the settlor is alive, their current wishes carry significant weight; when deceased, the court looks to the trust language and available evidence to infer intent. Understanding who the settlor is and what they intended helps trustees, beneficiaries, and courts determine whether requested changes respect the original planning objectives and preserve the settlor’s overarching goals.
A revocable trust is a trust that the settlor can change or revoke during their lifetime. Because these trusts are flexible, modifications are commonly sought when circumstances shift after the trust’s initial creation. When the settlor loses capacity or dies, the trust often becomes irrevocable, which limits how changes can be made without court approval. A petition may be needed to resolve ambiguities, correct mistakes, or adapt administration to new legal or financial realities. Clear documentation of the trust terms and any amendments is essential when seeking judicial relief.
The trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests, maintain accurate records, and follow the trust document and court orders. When a trustee encounters obstacles—such as ambiguous language, tax complications, or conflicts among beneficiaries—they may seek a court modification to obtain definitive guidance. Proper notice to beneficiaries and careful documentation support the trustee’s request and help the court assess whether a change is appropriate.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have rights to notice of petitions that affect their interests and the opportunity to object if they believe a proposed modification would be inconsistent with the settlor’s intent. Courts consider beneficiaries’ positions when deciding petitions to ensure changes are fair and legally sound. Clear communication and early involvement of affected beneficiaries often reduce disputes and make the modification process smoother and more predictable.
When addressing trust issues, parties may consider informal amendments, trustee decanting, or a court petition. Amendments are possible only when the trust grantor is alive and retained amendment rights. Decanting allows a trustee to transfer assets to a new trust with different terms if state law and the trust document permit it. A court petition is often necessary when the grantor is no longer able to amend, the change affects third parties, or disputes arise. Each option has procedural and evidentiary requirements; evaluating these alternatives helps determine the most reliable path for achieving the desired result.
If the settlor remains capable and retained the power to amend the trust, a direct amendment often resolves problems without court involvement. This path is efficient when the needed change is straightforward, such as updating trustee appointments or adjusting distribution timing. Working with legal counsel to prepare a clear amendment helps avoid future ambiguity and ensures the new language integrates with the rest of the trust. Proper execution and documentation preserve the trust’s continuity and reduce the likelihood of later disputes among beneficiaries.
In some circumstances the trustee can decant assets into a new trust with revised terms if state statutes and the trust instrument authorize it. Decanting can be an efficient tool for correcting administrative issues, clarifying ambiguities, or adjusting distribution provisions without litigation. The trustee must act within statutory limits, provide required notices, and ensure the new trust does not unfairly prejudice beneficiaries. When legal authority for decanting is clear and beneficiaries are likely to accept the change, this limited approach can be faster and less costly than filing a petition.
Trusts rarely exist in isolation; they commonly connect to pour-over wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, retirement account designations, and other planning tools. A comprehensive approach reviews all related documents to ensure consistency after a modification. This prevents unintended conflicts that could cause administration delays, tax consequences, or beneficiary disputes. Comprehensive handling also identifies necessary updates such as Certifications of Trust or recording changes to property deeds so that third parties and financial institutions recognize the trustee’s authority under the modified arrangement.
When a trust issue involves substantial assets, tax considerations, blended-family interests, incapacity issues, or claim disputes, a court petition and coordinated planning often produce the most reliable result. Courts weigh competing interests and factual evidence, and careful legal preparation increases the likelihood of a clear, enforceable order. A broad approach includes investigation, coordinated filings, and post-order implementation to address beneficiary notice requirements, potential creditor claims, and ongoing fiduciary duties, reducing the chance of future litigation or administrative complications.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification addresses the full range of legal, tax, and practical implications. It ensures that changes align with the settlor’s intent while updating related estate planning documents, title records, and beneficiary designations. This holistic review reduces inconsistencies that can create administrative headaches or invite litigation. It also improves clarity for successor trustees and financial institutions, making it easier to administer assets and carry out distributions according to the revised plan without repeated court intervention or uncertainty.
Taking a broad view also helps identify and mitigate risks such as unintended tax consequences, creditor exposure, or conflicts among beneficiaries. By coordinating with tax advisors, financial professionals, and family members when appropriate, the legal team can craft changes that preserve value and support a smoother transition. The end result is a trust administration framework that is easier to manage, less likely to prompt disputes, and tailored to meet current circumstances while staying true to the settlor’s enduring goals.
When a modification is achieved through the court and followed by coordinated updates to related planning documents, trustees and beneficiaries gain a higher degree of certainty. A judicial order clarifies roles, reduces ambiguity, and provides a clear basis for third parties to honor the trustee’s authority. This enforceability streamlines administration, protects assets, and limits the grounds for future challenges. For families seeking long-term stability after a change, this level of legal certainty is an important protection that supports the trust’s continued effective operation.
Comprehensive planning reduces the likelihood that ambiguities or oversight will spark later conflicts among beneficiaries or trustees. By resolving issues proactively and documenting the rationale for modifications, parties are less likely to pursue costly litigation in the future. Clear records, updated certifications, and formal court orders provide a defensible administrative trail that supports the trustee’s decisions. This preventive focus preserves family relationships and reduces administrative burdens, making the trust easier to manage for current and successor fiduciaries.
Gathering and reviewing all relevant estate planning documents is the first essential step. This includes the original trust agreement, any amendments, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, certifications of trust, retirement plan beneficiary designations, and deeds. Careful comparison of these materials helps identify conflicts, drafting errors, or unintended effects that a petition should address. Complete documentation also strengthens your position with the court and allows the trustee to propose precise language for the requested modification, reducing uncertainty and delay.
A successful petition rests on sound factual support showing why the trust language no longer works as intended. This may include affidavits about changes in the settlor’s circumstances, evidence of drafting mistakes, financial records demonstrating tax consequences, and medical documentation when incapacity is involved. Compiling credible evidence and presenting a clear narrative helps the court understand the need for change and craft an order that respects the settlor’s objectives while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
Families seek trust modification petitions for many reasons, including changes in family composition, unexpected tax developments, errors in original documents, and trustee incapacity or resignation. A petition provides judicial authority to adapt the trust to new realities while preserving the settlor’s overarching intentions. When informal adjustments are not possible, or when differences among beneficiaries create uncertainty, a court-approved modification offers a reliable path forward that clarifies rights, resolves disputes, and facilitates efficient administration of trust assets.
Another common reason to pursue a petition is to remedy ambiguities that complicate asset transfers or title matters. Clear judicial instructions can make it easier to sell or retitle property, update beneficiary designations, and coordinate retirement account distributions. A petition also helps trustees address unanticipated liabilities or creditor claims by establishing authority to take protective actions. For trustees and families seeking stability, the court process provides a formal mechanism to align trust administration with current legal and financial circumstances.
Typical triggers for a petition include discovery of drafting errors, changes in beneficiary needs or capacities, the settlor’s loss of capacity, or tax law changes that affect trust planning. Additionally, blended families and complex asset portfolios can create scenarios where the original language no longer functions as intended. In some cases, conflicts among beneficiaries or competing claims to trust assets make a court intervention the practical route to obtain a definitive resolution and enable the trustee to administer the trust with legal authority.
When trust language is vague or contains drafting mistakes, trustees and beneficiaries may find it difficult to determine the settlor’s true intent. These ambiguities can prevent timely distributions, complicate property transfers, and increase the risk of disputes. A petition provides a forum to present evidence about the intended meaning and request a judicial interpretation or correction. Resolving these issues through the court reduces ongoing uncertainty and creates a clear basis for administering the trust according to the settlor’s wishes.
Major life changes such as births, deaths, marriages, divorces, or the emergence of beneficiaries with special needs may render existing trust provisions impractical or unfair. When these events occur after the settlor can no longer amend the trust, a petition helps adjust distributions or protective provisions to reflect current realities. Courts will consider the settlor’s probable intent and the practical needs of beneficiaries when deciding whether a modification should be permitted, and the process helps ensure a balanced outcome that addresses both intent and present circumstances.
Changes in tax law or legal interpretations can affect the desirability or viability of certain trust provisions, prompting a need to modify terms to avoid adverse consequences. A petition allows a trustee to seek a judicial determination that accommodates new tax rules while preserving the settlor’s objectives when possible. Addressing tax or legal shifts through a court process also provides a documented rationale for the change, which can be important for record-keeping and for responding to inquiries from tax authorities or financial institutions.
If you are in Visitacion Valley and facing trust administration obstacles, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers local representation and guidance tailored to your needs. We help clients identify whether a petition is necessary, prepare required notices, draft supporting declarations, and represent trustees and beneficiaries in court when needed. Our practice emphasizes clear communication, timely action, and practical solutions that reflect local court procedures in San Francisco County. Contact us to discuss how a trust modification petition may resolve your situation and protect the estate plan.
Choosing legal representation for a trust modification petition means selecting a team that will thoroughly review your documents, explain the available options, and prepare a persuasive petition when court intervention is required. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we focus on delivering clear, practical guidance to trustees and families facing complex trust issues. We emphasize careful preparation, timely notice to interested parties, and strategic presentation of evidence to help the court understand the grounds for change and issue an enforceable order.
We also coordinate updates to related estate planning instruments and administrative records so that the modification functions smoothly in practice. That coordination can include preparing Certifications of Trust, updating deeds, and advising on beneficiary designations or retirement plan considerations. Our goal is to minimize downstream complications, reduce the risk of disputes, and provide trustees with a clear roadmap for implementing the court’s order while preserving the settlor’s overall intentions and protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
When litigation becomes necessary, we present petitions and supporting evidence with precision and attention to detail, while maintaining a focus on settling disputes amicably when possible. We work to achieve outcomes that balance efficiency, fairness, and legal soundness, keeping clients informed at each step. If you need assistance preparing a trust modification petition or evaluating alternatives such as decanting or amendment, our office is available by phone and email to schedule an initial consultation and begin the document review process.
Our process begins with an intake and document collection to understand the trust, its amendments, and related estate planning materials. We evaluate available statutory mechanisms, consider whether decanting or an amendment is possible, and determine whether a court petition is the most appropriate route. If a petition is needed we prepare the required pleadings, gather evidence and declarations, provide required notices to interested parties, and represent clients at hearings. After a court order is obtained we assist with implementing the changes and updating relevant records.
In the initial stage we review the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents, and records that illuminate the facts prompting modification. This assessment identifies whether the settlor retained amendment powers, whether decanting is authorized, and which beneficiaries must be notified. We also consider potential tax implications and gather evidence to support the proposed change. The outcome of this assessment determines the recommended path and informs the scope of the petition or alternative action.
Collecting all pertinent documents early prevents surprises later in the process. This includes the trust instrument, amendments, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, property deeds, retirement account documents, and previous trustee accountings if available. Verifying the authenticity of these materials and identifying any inconsistencies helps us prepare a coherent factual narrative for the court. Well-documented evidence strengthens the petition and increases the chances of a timely, favorable ruling.
We identify all beneficiaries, potential beneficiaries, and other interested parties who must receive notice of a petition. Proper notice procedures are critical to avoid procedural defects that can delay proceedings. This phase includes compiling contact information, preparing formal notice documents, and ensuring that statutory deadlines are met. Clear, accurate notice protects the court process and gives affected parties an opportunity to respond or propose alternatives, which can lead to negotiated resolutions in some cases.
Once the facts and parties are identified, we draft a petition that sets forth the legal grounds for modification, presents the factual record, and proposes specific changes to the trust language. The petition is prepared with supporting declarations, exhibits, and a proposed court order. We then file the petition with the appropriate court in San Francisco County, serve the required notices, and monitor deadlines for responses. Clear, organized pleadings help the court efficiently evaluate the request and schedule any necessary hearings.
Supporting declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals provide the factual basis the court needs to evaluate the proposed modification. These statements explain changed circumstances, drafting errors, or practical obstacles to administration and may include financial records, medical documentation, or affidavits about the settlor’s intent. Compelling, well-supported declarations reduce uncertainty and help the judge understand why the requested change is consistent with the trust’s purpose and beneficiaries’ interests.
After filing the petition and serving notice, we monitor for responses from interested parties and handle any objections or requests for additional information. The court may set a briefing schedule or encourage mediation to resolve contentious issues. When objections arise we present legal arguments and factual support to the court, striving to address concerns pragmatically while protecting our client’s position. Keeping open lines of communication with beneficiaries sometimes leads to negotiated settlements that avoid contested hearings.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present evidence and legal argument to support the petition and respond to objections. After hearing the matter the judge may grant the modification, deny it, or issue a tailored order that resolves specific issues. Once an order is entered, we assist trustees with implementing required changes, updating titles, preparing Certifications of Trust, and advising on any tax or reporting matters. The implementation phase ensures the court’s directives are followed and that trust administration proceeds smoothly under the new terms.
At the hearing the court considers the petition, supporting declarations, and any objections. Judges focus on whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether beneficiaries’ rights are adequately protected. Our role is to present a clear, concise factual record and legal argument that supports the requested modification. A well-prepared hearing often leads to an order that provides certainty and direction for trustees, enabling them to continue administration without ambiguity or ongoing dispute.
After obtaining a court order, trustees must follow through with the administrative steps necessary to reflect the new terms. This may include recording deeds, updating account registrations, preparing a Certification of Trust, revising beneficiary designations, and notifying financial institutions. Completing these tasks preserves the integrity of the estate plan and ensures third parties recognize the trustee’s authority. We assist with drafting and filing required documentation so the trust operates under the court-approved framework.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the court asking for an order to change or clarify the terms of an existing trust. Petitions are typically used when the settlor can no longer amend the trust, when language is ambiguous or contains drafting errors, or when changed circumstances such as tax law revisions or beneficiary needs make the current provisions impractical. The petition explains the need for change, presents factual support, and proposes specific modifications for the judge to consider. The court evaluates the petition with an eye toward honoring the settlor’s probable intent and protecting beneficiaries’ rights. Interested parties must receive notice and have the opportunity to object. Depending on the complexity of the facts and the presence of objections, the court may hold a hearing and issue an order granting, denying, or tailoring the requested change. A judicial order provides enforceable authority for trustees to implement the modification.
In some cases a trustee can make changes through trustee powers such as decanting or under express amendment provisions if the trust document and state law permit. Decanting involves transferring assets from an existing trust into a new trust with different terms when authorized. When the settlor is alive and retained amendment authority, they can typically execute an amendment directly without court involvement. These limited, nonjudicial routes are faster but depend on the trust’s language and applicable statutes. When the trust is irrevocable, the settlor lacks amendment power, or beneficiaries dispute the proposed adjustment, a court petition is often necessary. A petition provides a definitive legal route to modify terms when other mechanisms are unavailable or contested. Courts require notice and evidence, and the judicial process creates a clear ruling that reduces future uncertainty and supports lawful administration.
Timing for a trust modification petition varies with case complexity and court schedules. Simple petitions with cooperative parties and clear evidence can proceed more quickly, potentially resolving in a few months, while contested matters that require multiple hearings or complex factual development may take longer. Local court calendars in San Francisco County and the need for discovery or additional declarations also influence timeline estimates. Prompt document collection and thorough preparation help move the process forward efficiently. If beneficiaries raise objections or additional evidence is required, the court may set further deadlines and hearings, extending the timeline. Early, clear communication with interested parties and careful preparation of supporting declarations and exhibits can reduce delays. After the court issues an order, implementation tasks like updating deeds and account registrations may add administrative time, but these steps are important to make the court’s decision effective in practice.
Interested parties typically include current beneficiaries, contingent beneficiaries, and any persons or entities with a potential claim under the trust terms. In some cases, creditors or parties with an economic interest may also need notice. State statutes and local court rules dictate the scope of required notice and the methods of service. Properly identifying and serving these parties is essential to avoid procedural challenges that can delay or invalidate proceedings. Providing accurate notice gives beneficiaries an opportunity to review the petition, raise objections, or propose alternative solutions. Early engagement and transparent communication sometimes lead to negotiated resolutions and eliminate the need for a contested hearing. When objections do arise, the court will consider the arguments of all interested parties before reaching a decision to ensure fairness and legal compliance.
Courts consider a mix of documentary and testimonial evidence when evaluating a trust modification petition. This may include the original trust document and any amendments, affidavits or declarations from trustees and family members, medical records when capacity is at issue, financial evidence showing practical difficulties or tax impacts, and correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. A clear factual narrative that explains why the present terms are unworkable or inconsistent with intent strengthens the petition. The judge also weighs legal arguments regarding the authority to modify, statutory standards for decanting or amendment, and whether beneficiaries’ interests are adequately protected. The court focuses on honoring the settlor’s intent while ensuring that modifications do not unfairly prejudice beneficiaries. Presenting organized, credible evidence enhances the likelihood of a definitive, enforceable order.
A modification can have tax consequences depending on the nature of the change and the assets involved. Adjusting distribution timing, changing trust terms that affect income allocation, or altering beneficiaries may change tax exposure for the trust or its beneficiaries. It can also affect estate tax planning or the treatment of retirement accounts. Early consultation with a tax advisor helps identify potential impacts and shape the requested modification to minimize unintended tax results. Creditor claims can also be affected when trust terms are modified, particularly if modifications are viewed as prejudicing creditor rights or altering asset protections. Courts consider whether a change is equitable in light of creditors’ and beneficiaries’ interests. Proper timing, notice, and a documented factual basis help mitigate the risk of unexpected creditor challenges and ensure the court can address these concerns when issuing an order.
Yes, beneficiaries may oppose a proposed modification if they believe it conflicts with the settlor’s intent or unfairly affects their interests. Opposition can take the form of formal objections, requests for additional evidence, or assertions that statutory standards for modification or decanting are not met. Courts will carefully consider objections and the supporting evidence before deciding whether to grant the requested change. Beneficiaries’ rights to notice and to be heard are key protections in the process. When opposition arises, courts may encourage negotiation or mediation to resolve disputes outside of a contested hearing. Settlement can lead to mutually agreeable revisions without an extended court battle, but when disputes cannot be resolved, the court will rule based on the record presented. Preparing a thorough factual and legal record helps address objections effectively and demonstrates respect for beneficiaries’ interests.
Alternatives to a court petition include direct amendment by the settlor when they retain that power, trustee decanting if statute and the trust instrument allow it, and negotiated settlements among beneficiaries to agree on changes. Each alternative depends on the trust’s terms, the settlor’s status, and whether beneficiaries are willing to cooperate. These options can be faster and less costly than litigation when they are legally available and acceptable to all parties. If nonjudicial routes are unavailable or contested, mediation and settlement negotiations remain valuable even after a petition is filed. Courts often encourage dispute resolution where appropriate. Assessing available alternatives early can save time and expense, but when legal authority is lacking or disputes persist, filing a petition provides the formal mechanism needed to secure an enforceable resolution.
Costs for pursuing a trust modification petition vary depending on the case’s complexity, the need for litigation, the number of interested parties, and the extent of required evidence and hearings. Simple, uncontested matters that resolve quickly will be less expensive than contested proceedings involving extensive discovery, expert reports, or multiple court appearances. Legal fees also reflect time spent on drafting pleadings, serving notices, and representing clients at hearings. Being well prepared and organized can reduce hours billed and overall cost. Some procedural steps, such as filing fees, service expenses, and costs for obtaining records, are additional to attorney fees. When cost is a concern, early discussion of budget and alternatives like mediation or targeted petitions helps manage expenses. We provide upfront guidance on likely cost ranges and work to find efficient approaches that fit each client’s objectives while protecting the estate plan and beneficiaries’ interests.
After the court approves a modification, the trustee must implement the order by taking administrative steps such as updating account registrations, preparing Certifications of Trust if needed, recording deeds, and notifying financial institutions. These post-order tasks ensure third parties recognize the trustee’s authority and that the trust operates under the revised terms. Proper implementation translates the court’s decision into effective changes that guide future administration and distributions. In some cases the order will require monitoring or periodic reporting to the court, especially if the modification addresses ongoing management or protective provisions for beneficiaries. The trustee should maintain clear records of actions taken to comply with the order. We assist clients with the practical steps after approval to ensure the trust functions as intended and to minimize the risk of future disputes or administrative problems.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas