A Heggstad petition is commonly used when a revocable living trust has not been fully funded and real property needs to be transferred into the trust after the trustmaker’s death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist residents of August, San Joaquin County, and greater California with the procedural and evidentiary steps necessary to ask the court to recognize that certain property belongs to the decedent’s trust. This process helps ensure that assets intended to be controlled by the trust are treated consistently with the trustmaker’s documented estate plan, avoiding confusion and reducing the risk of assets being distributed contrary to the trust’s terms.
Many families discover after a loved one’s death that some real estate was never formally transferred into a trust, even though the trustmaker intended that result. The Heggstad petition provides a judicial method to request a declaration that specific assets are trust property despite the absence of recorded conveyance prior to death. This remedy relies on evidence such as the trust document, deeds, transfer paperwork drafts, tax records, and witness testimony. A carefully prepared petition helps protect beneficiaries’ interests, clarifies title issues for property sales or refinancing, and supports a clean administration of the trust’s terms under California probate and trust law.
A Heggstad petition matters because it creates a clear, court-recognized record that particular property was intended to belong to a revocable living trust even though formal transfer steps were incomplete. This remedy reduces title uncertainty, allowing beneficiaries to sell, refinance, or otherwise manage trust assets without prolonged disputes. The petition also helps prevent unintended intestate distribution and can streamline trust administration by aligning recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s documented intentions. For many families, resolving these issues promptly protects estate value, preserves family relationships, and avoids protracted litigation that can drain resources and delay distributions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is located in San Jose and serves clients throughout California, including August and San Joaquin County, with a focus on estate planning and trust administration matters. Our practice emphasizes thorough document review, careful fact gathering, and clear communication with families and fiduciaries. When a trust appears to have been intended to hold particular real property but the deed was not recorded, we evaluate available documentary and testimonial evidence, prepare a concise petition for the court, and coordinate with title companies, real estate brokers, and county recorder offices to resolve title issues efficiently and respectfully on behalf of beneficiaries and trustees.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that property should be treated as belonging to a trust based on evidence that the decedent intended the transfer but did not complete recording steps before death. Common scenarios include a draft deed left unsigned or recorded improperly, a deed delivered but not recorded, or clear statements in the trust document and supporting records showing an intent to transfer ownership to the trust. The petition process typically involves filing paperwork, providing notice to interested parties, and presenting proof such as draft deeds, correspondence, or testimony to establish the trustmaker’s intent and actions toward funding the trust.
The outcome of a Heggstad petition can affect title insurance, the ability to sell or refinance real property, and the distribution of trust assets. Courts evaluate whether the evidence demonstrates a present intent to transfer and whether the trustmaker took actions indicating ownership should pass to the trust. The petition can be faster and less disruptive than other probate proceedings when the goal is limited to clarifying that specific property is trust property. However, success depends on the quality of documentation and witness accounts, and practical coordination with county recorders and title companies is often necessary to complete the process.
A Heggstad petition is a request to the probate court to recognize that property should have been part of a trust despite lacking a recorded transfer. It is named after case law addressing informal transfers to a trust and is grounded in principles that honor the settlor’s clear intent when supported by adequate evidence. The petition asks the court to declare title consistent with the trust documents, and the court may issue an order permitting recording of a corrected deed or otherwise clarifying ownership. This legal mechanism helps avoid unintended outcomes when administrative steps were incomplete at the settlor’s death.
Preparing a Heggstad petition requires assembling the trust document, any draft or signed deeds, correspondence that reflects the trustmaker’s intent, witness declarations, and relevant financial records. The petition must set forth facts demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent and describe the property in question with legal description and parcel data. Notice provisions require identifying interested parties, such as beneficiaries and heirs, and addressing potential creditor concerns. The court may hold a hearing and then issue an order clarifying that title should be recognized in the trust, which often allows the trustee to record documents necessary to show clear ownership for real property transactions.
Understanding the legal terms associated with Heggstad petitions helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the process more confidently. Important concepts include funding the trust, constructive delivery, declaration of trust ownership, recording, and notice to interested parties. Knowing these terms clarifies the types of evidence courts will consider and the practical steps needed to finalize title adjustments. This glossary provides brief, plain-language definitions to assist families as they navigate petition preparation, court filings, and subsequent recording with county offices and title companies.
Funding the trust means transferring assets from the individual’s name into the trust so the trustee can manage them according to the trust’s terms. For real property, funding typically requires a deed transferring title to the trustee or the trust’s name and recording that deed with the county recorder. Funding avoids the need for probate and helps ensure a smoother transition of assets. When funding is incomplete at death, a Heggstad petition may be used to show that the transfer was intended, so the court can treat the property as part of the trust for administration and distribution purposes.
Constructive delivery refers to actions and circumstances that indicate the trustmaker intended to transfer property into the trust even if formal recording was not completed. This can include drafting and signing a deed, delivering the deed to an agent or attorney, changing insurance or tax records to reflect the trust, or other conduct consistent with transfer intent. Courts consider such evidence in determining whether title should be declared part of the trust. Constructive delivery is a key concept in Heggstad petitions because it helps bridge the gap between intention and recording formalities.
A declaration of trust ownership is a court order or other formal statement recognizing that certain assets belong to a trust. In the Heggstad context, the court can issue an order confirming that particular property is trust property, enabling the trustee to record necessary documents and manage or dispose of the asset per the trust’s terms. This declaration provides reassurance to title companies, lenders, and third parties that the trustee has authority to act and that trust beneficiaries’ rights are protected under the terms of the trust.
Notice to interested parties means informing beneficiaries, heirs, and other individuals or entities with potential claims about the petition and any court proceedings. Proper notice is required by court rules to give those parties an opportunity to respond or object. Providing accurate notice helps prevent future disputes and allows the court to consider any competing interests before issuing a ruling. In a Heggstad petition, notice procedures typically include serving documents and filing proof of service so the court can proceed in a manner that respects due process.
When a trust has unfunded assets, families can consider several routes: filing a Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership, initiating probate, or using other probate court petitions to transfer title. A Heggstad petition can be more efficient and narrowly tailored when evidence supports a finding that the decedent intended the property to be held in trust. Probate may be broader and more time-consuming, potentially exposing assets to creditor claims and public administration. The best path depends on the factual record, the complexity of the estate, and whether title clarity or full probate administration is required to settle the estate’s affairs.
A focused petition to confirm that property belongs to a trust is often suitable when there is clear documentary evidence showing the trustmaker intended to transfer the asset. Examples include draft deeds, signed transfer documents, trust provisions specifically referencing the asset, emails or letters discussing the transfer, and updated insurance or tax records. When this documentation paints a consistent picture, courts can evaluate the materials and, if persuaded, enter an order recognizing the property as trust property without the need for a broader probate administration, which can reduce time and expense for beneficiaries.
A targeted petition is more likely to resolve matters quickly when there are no active creditor claims or contested heir disputes that require full probate oversight. If the interested parties are in agreement or there are no reasonable objections anticipated, a Heggstad petition can clarify title and allow trustees to proceed with trust administration tasks such as selling or refinancing property. This approach reduces public exposure of family affairs and preserves privacy while addressing the immediate practical problem of unrecorded transfers.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when the estate involves contested claims, potential creditor actions, unclear beneficiary designations, or multiple properties with disputed ownership. In such circumstances, a full probate administration or a combination of petitions and litigation may be required to protect the estate and resolve competing interests. Addressing complex disputes often demands coordinated legal strategy, document preservation, and procedural steps to ensure all parties receive proper notice and that the court can make binding decisions that settle title and distribution issues across the estate.
Sometimes title companies or lenders require additional documentation or negotiated resolutions to clear liens, pay off encumbrances, or address recording defects that a single declaration cannot fully resolve. In those cases, comprehensive legal services may include coordinating payoff agreements, resolving outstanding tax issues, engaging in settlement discussions with claimants, or pursuing related petitions that ensure clean title. A broader process helps satisfy third-party requirements so property transactions can proceed without unexpected setbacks or additional legal exposure.
A comprehensive legal approach offers thorough protection when the estate presents multiple interrelated issues. By addressing title defects, creditor claims, beneficiary disputes, and recording problems in a coordinated way, the process reduces the risk of later challenges and supports more reliable outcomes for trustees and beneficiaries. Such an approach can streamline interactions with title companies and lenders, ensure notice and timelines are properly managed, and create a durable court record that supports long-term property management and distribution according to the trustmaker’s intentions.
Comprehensive handling also helps preserve estate value by resolving encumbrances, coordinating necessary payoffs, and clearing any cloud on title that might impair sale or refinancing. It can protect family relationships by providing a structured forum for resolving disagreements and ensuring that each interested party receives proper information and opportunity to respond. For trustees, having a complete and defensible legal pathway reduces personal liability and helps ensure that fiduciary duties are performed in a transparent and legally sound manner.
One of the primary advantages of a thorough approach is establishing clear title so real estate can be confidently sold, refinanced, or conveyed by the trustee. By resolving recording deficiencies, addressing liens, and obtaining a court declaration or other corrective documents, the trustee can provide title companies and lenders with the assurances they need. This clarity reduces delays in closing transactions, avoids unexpected claims after a sale, and protects beneficiaries who receive proceeds consistent with the trust terms.
A comprehensive process reduces the risk of future litigation by resolving potential disputes up front and creating a detailed court record that memorializes the basis for title decisions. When the court evaluates evidence, orders are entered, and documentation is recorded, interested parties have less basis to later challenge ownership or distribution. This approach helps trustees administer the trust with confidence, mitigates the possibility of post-distribution claims, and supports durable outcomes aligned with the trustmaker’s intentions and applicable law.
When you suspect a trust was intended to own a property but no deed was recorded, begin by gathering all possible evidence. Collect the trust document, any draft deeds, correspondence with attorneys or real estate agents, county property tax records, insurance policies naming the trust, and any closing or escrow paperwork. Timely preservation of these materials strengthens a Heggstad petition by documenting the trustmaker’s intent and the steps taken before death. Early, organized collection reduces later delays and facilitates clearer, more persuasive filings to resolve title issues.
Follow court rules for providing notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties so the petition proceeds without delay. Serving notice and filing proofs of service are essential procedural steps and help minimize the risk of later objections or appeals. When parties have an opportunity to review the petition and supporting evidence, many issues can be resolved informally or clarified before a hearing. Thoughtful, respectful communication with family members and interested parties often reduces conflict and promotes a more efficient resolution of title matters.
Families consider a Heggstad petition to confirm property ownership in a trust when they face practical obstacles such as inability to sell, refinance, or otherwise manage real property because a deed was not recorded. When an otherwise valid trust exists and documentary evidence supports the settlor’s intent, the petition can align recorded title with the trust’s terms. This recovers the benefits of trust ownership, including continuity of management by the trustee, privacy compared to probate, and clearer paths for distribution to intended beneficiaries without unnecessary delay or public administration.
A Heggstad petition is also considered to reduce the risk of assets passing under intestate rules that could defeat the trustmaker’s wishes. By creating a court record that links property to the trust, trustees can act with greater confidence, title companies can insure transactions, and beneficiaries can receive distributions without lingering title clouds. This approach is particularly helpful when the trustmaker’s records show an intent to fund the trust but administrative steps were incomplete due to oversight, illness, or intervening events that prevented recording before death.
Common circumstances include draft deeds discovered after death, deeds delivered but not recorded, deeds executed incorrectly, or property intended for a pour-over will where the trust funding step did not occur. Other scenarios involve joint ownership transfers that were not completed or trust documents specifically referencing property that remains titled in the decedent’s name. In each situation, evidence such as written drafts, escrow instructions, or corroborating testimony can support a petition seeking a court declaration to treat such assets as trust property.
Discovering a draft deed or an instrument intended to transfer property to a trust after a loved one’s death is a frequent trigger for filing a Heggstad petition. These documents, while not recorded, can show a clear intent and may be supported by contemporaneous correspondence or witness statements. The court will assess whether the materials and surrounding facts indicate a completed intent to transfer ownership to the trust, allowing the trustee to obtain a judicial declaration that the property belongs to the trust for administration and distribution purposes.
Sometimes property remains titled in the decedent’s name because the settlor did not complete the recording process or encountered unexpected barriers. When the trust document shows the settlor intended to hold the property in trust, a Heggstad petition can be used to explain why the property should be treated as trust property. This process helps trustees gain authority over the asset and ensures that distributions align with the trustmaker’s estate plan instead of default probate rules that might produce unintended results.
Title defects discovered during a planned sale or refinance often reveal that a trust was not properly funded. Lenders and title companies need assurance of clear ownership before approving transactions, and a Heggstad petition can produce the court findings required to record corrective documents and satisfy third-party requirements. Resolving these title issues through the petition process helps complete property transactions without undue delay and protects both trustees and beneficiaries from unexpected post-closing disputes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local assistance for trust funding issues, Heggstad petitions, and related probate matters in August and throughout San Joaquin County. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, real estate professionals, and title companies to coordinate the practical and legal steps required to clarify title. Our approach focuses on gathering necessary evidence, preparing clear petitions, and managing communications with interested parties so matters move forward efficiently and with respect for family circumstances and the decedent’s documented wishes.
We help clients by conducting a thorough review of the trust and related documents to determine whether a petition is appropriate. Our work includes identifying and assembling deeds, draft instruments, escrow or closing documents, and other evidence of intent, and then preparing a petition that presents the facts in a clear, persuasive manner to the court. We also ensure proper notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties and coordinate with title and escrow professionals to resolve post-order recording and insurance issues.
When cases require broader resolution, such as addressing liens, creditor claims, or competing beneficiary interests, we guide trustees through additional petitions or probating certain matters when necessary. Our goal is to protect beneficiaries’ interests while keeping the process as focused and efficient as possible. We provide practical advice on the steps needed to complete transactions and defend actions if disputes arise, always aiming to preserve estate value and family relationships through clear, procedurally correct filings and communications.
We also assist with the related documents commonly used in trust administration and estate planning, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, advance health care directives, financial powers of attorney, certification of trust, and guardianship nominations. This broader support ensures trustees have the documentation required for day-to-day management and that beneficiaries receive distributions in accordance with the trustmaker’s overall estate plan, minimizing surprises and legal obstacles during administration.
We begin with an intake meeting to review the trust and any related instruments and gather available documents that may support a petition. Next, we evaluate whether a Heggstad petition or another remedy is the most practical path given the estate’s facts. If moving forward, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, identify interested parties for notice, and pursue court scheduling. After a hearing, if the court issues an order, we coordinate recording corrected deeds and work with title companies and lenders to clear any remaining obstacles so trustees can manage or transact with the property.
The first step involves a careful assessment of the trust, deed records, and any drafts or related documents that indicate intent to transfer property to the trust. We request copies of deeds, escrow instructions, correspondence, and financial or tax records that reflect ownership changes or trust naming. Interviews with witnesses or the attorney who prepared the trust can provide helpful context. This comprehensive document collection and fact-gathering form the foundation for a persuasive petition and reduce the likelihood of surprises during court review or title company vetting.
We review the trust document to identify specific references to the property and examine county recorder records to determine current title status. Our review extends to draft deeds, grant deed forms, and any prior recordings that might affect transfer. We also check tax assessments and insurance records to see whether the trust was reflected in other official documents. This detailed review helps establish a timeline of steps taken by the trustmaker and supports a fact-based narrative for the court describing the settlor’s intent and actions.
After identifying relevant records, we gather supporting documents such as communications with real estate agents, escrow officers, or attorneys, and obtain declarations from witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent. These statements provide context about signed but unrecorded deeds, instructions left with professionals, or other conduct demonstrating intent. The combination of documentary and testimonial evidence helps the court evaluate whether to grant a declaration that the property belongs to the trust and to authorize subsequent recording or corrective steps.
Once the evidence is assembled, we draft a petition that outlines factual background, attaches supporting documents, identifies the property by legal description, and requests the court to declare the property trust-owned. The filing includes a proposed order and a plan for providing notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors. Properly prepared pleadings emphasize clarity and relevance of documentation and present a compelling narrative that focuses on whether the trustmaker intended the transfer and what equitable relief the court should grant to effectuate those intentions.
Following court filing procedures, we serve the required notices to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties and file proofs of service. This step ensures that those with potential claims or objections have an opportunity to respond. Addressing notice carefully reduces the risk of procedural defects and allows the court to proceed with the matter. In many cases, early communication with interested parties permits informal resolutions that narrow contested issues before a hearing is held.
At the scheduled hearing, we present the assembled documentary and witness evidence supporting the petition and respond to any objections raised by other parties. We propose a specific form of order that clarifies ownership and authorizes recording of corrective documents. After the court issues its ruling, we take the steps necessary to implement the order, including preparing deeds consistent with the order and coordinating with the county recorder and title company to ensure the legal changes are reflected in public records.
After the court issues a declaration, the trustee typically records corrective deeds or other documents permitted by the order to clarify title. We handle the preparation and recording steps and work with title insurers to obtain coverage reflecting the corrected ownership. If liens or encumbrances remain, we coordinate resolution through negotiated payoffs or additional court filings. Completing these post-order tasks ensures that the trustee can manage or sell the property with clear title and that subsequent transactions proceed with confidence and minimal delay.
We prepare any deeds or instruments authorized by the court order for recording and submit them to the county recorder. We also ensure tax and insurance records are updated to reflect the trust’s ownership, coordinating with relevant agencies and institutions. Proper recording and updating of records prevents future title disputes, facilitates closings, and helps trustees fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities while maintaining an accurate public record of ownership consistent with the trustmaker’s intentions.
We liaise with title companies and lenders to provide the court order, recorded documents, and any other evidence they require to clear title and provide insurance or financing. This coordination includes resolving any outstanding liens, satisfying lender requirements for payoffs or subordinations, and supplying affidavits or certifications needed to finalize transactions. Working closely with these third parties ensures that property sales or refinances can proceed without unexpected legal obstacles after the court has recognized trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court request asking the court to declare that specific property should be treated as owned by a trust despite the absence of a recorded deed prior to the trustmaker’s death. The petition is appropriate when the trust document and supporting evidence indicate the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust but administrative steps to record the transfer were not completed. The court evaluates the evidence and may enter an order recognizing the property as trust property, which facilitates trust administration and title clearance. Filing is particularly suitable when the issue is limited to clarifying ownership rather than conducting a full probate administration. The petition focuses on the property at issue and seeks a judicial declaration that aligns recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s documented intent. This procedure can be less disruptive than full probate and is often used to enable sales, refinances, or trustee management of trust assets that were not formally funded before death.
Courts consider a combination of documentary and testimonial evidence to determine whether the trustmaker intended to transfer property into the trust. Helpful documents include the trust instrument, draft or signed deeds, correspondence with attorneys or real estate professionals, escrow or closing records, tax assessments, and insurance policies indicating the trust’s interest. Deeds with legal descriptions, even if unrecorded, and contemporaneous communications that demonstrate intent to transfer are particularly persuasive when supported by consistent factual context. Witness declarations or testimony from the attorney who prepared the trust, family members, escrow officers, or others who observed the trustmaker’s actions can strengthen a petition. Statements about discussions, delivery of documents, or actions taken to treat the property as trust-owned help the court infer constructive delivery. The combined documentary and testimonial record must present a coherent narrative showing present intent to transfer ownership to the trust.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the factual record, court schedules, and whether interested parties raise objections. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and no objections, the process may resolve within a few months, including time needed for filing, serving notice, and obtaining a hearing. The speed also depends on local court calendars and the completeness of the supporting evidence assembled before filing. When disputes arise or additional discovery is required, the process can extend for a longer period as parties exchange information and the court schedules contested hearings. Coordination with title companies and lenders for post-order recording can add time, particularly if liens, payoffs, or additional clearance steps are necessary to satisfy third-party requirements before a sale or refinance can proceed.
A Heggstad petition often resolves title issues when the court issues a declaration confirming trust ownership and the order authorizes recording corrective documents. Title companies and lenders generally rely on a clear court order and properly recorded documents to insure or finance transactions. The petition can therefore be an effective tool for clearing title defects that arise from unrecorded transfers, enabling trustees to proceed with property sales or refinancing once the order is implemented and recorded. However, some situations involve additional complications such as unresolved liens, taxation matters, or competing claims that require separate resolution. In such cases, the petition may be only one step in a broader process to obtain clear title, and coordination with lenders, payoff arrangements, or additional court proceedings may be necessary to satisfy all third-party requirements before a transaction can close.
Notice must be given to beneficiaries, heirs, and any other persons or entities with a potential legal interest in the property or estate, as required by probate court rules. Proper notice provides these parties an opportunity to review the petition and raise objections if they dispute the factual record or the requested relief. Filing proof of service with the court demonstrates that notice requirements were met and helps the petition proceed on a sound procedural footing. Providing accurate and timely notice reduces the risk of later challenges based on procedural defects, and it can promote resolution by allowing parties to communicate and potentially reach agreement prior to a hearing. When creditor claims or other claimants exist, additional notice or creditor procedures may also be required to ensure that all interested parties have an opportunity to be heard.
Yes. If the court issues an order declaring that the property belongs to the trust, the trustee typically can record corrective deeds or instruments authorized by that order to reflect the trust’s ownership. The recorded documents should be prepared consistent with the court’s findings and legal description requirements, and the county recorder will index those documents to create a public record showing the trust as the owner. This step finalizes the transition of title into the trust for practical purposes such as sales or refinancing. Recording is often coordinated with title companies and lenders to ensure that the order and recorded instruments meet their underwriting standards. When liens, payoffs, or other encumbrances need resolution, those matters are often handled in parallel so the trustee can obtain title insurance or lender approval necessary for the transaction to move forward with clear, marketable title.
If an heir objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will allow the objection to be heard, and the matter may proceed as a contested hearing or require additional evidence. The objecting party bears the burden of presenting reasons why the court should not issue the requested declaration, which might include disputing the trustmaker’s intent, questioning the authenticity of documents, or asserting competing claims to the property. The court then evaluates the competing positions based on the evidence and applicable law. Contested proceedings may take longer and could involve depositions, document discovery, and formal courtroom hearings. Even when objections arise, some disputes can be resolved through negotiation or mediation to reach an agreed resolution that avoids prolonged litigation. Our role is to present the strongest possible factual record supporting the petitioner and to seek fair, efficient resolution consistent with the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition may include initiating probate administration to transfer title through the probate process, pursuing a quiet title action, or using other tailored probate petitions to address specific defects. Probate may be necessary when multiple assets are involved, creditor claims exist, or the estate’s overall condition requires full court supervision. Quiet title actions serve a similar purpose for resolving ownership disputes but follow a different procedural path and remedy set. Choosing an alternative depends on the facts and the parties’ objectives. When the issue is narrowly focused on proving that the decedent intended the property to belong to the trust, a Heggstad petition is often the most direct remedy. When matters are broader or contested, a more comprehensive approach such as probate or additional court actions may be preferable to ensure all interests are resolved appropriately.
Costs associated with a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the case, the amount of evidence needed, whether disputes arise, and local court filing fees. Simple, uncontested petitions with clear documentation typically involve lower costs related to preparing the petition, filing fees, and recording corrective documents. When coordination with title companies and lenders is straightforward, post-order steps also proceed with predictable expenses for recording and insurance adjustments. Contested matters, substantial document collection, or cases requiring depositions and formal discovery will increase time and expense. Additional costs may arise if the petition uncovers liens or encumbrances that require payoff or negotiation. We provide clear guidance on anticipated steps and fee structures during the initial consultation so clients can make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus alternatives.
Begin by collecting any documents that might show the trustmaker’s intent to transfer the property, including trust documents, draft deeds, escrow paperwork, correspondence, and insurance or tax records. Contact the county recorder to obtain copies of recorded documents and consult with your attorney to evaluate the evidence. Early organization of these materials allows for a more efficient review and helps identify whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed based on the available proof. When ready to proceed, schedule a consultation to review the facts and discuss the appropriate legal path. We can assist with document collection, preparing declarations from witnesses, filing the petition, serving notice, and navigating the court process. Our aim is to provide a clear plan that addresses both legal procedures and practical steps needed to resolve title issues and support trustee actions going forward.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas