A Heggstad petition is a focused legal procedure used when assets meant to be owned by a trust remain titled in a deceased person’s name. This page explains how the Heggstad process works for residents of Collierville and San Joaquin County, California, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help navigate the steps needed to move those assets into the trust. Whether a single parcel of real property or an overlooked account remains outside the trust, a properly prepared petition to the probate court can establish the trust’s ownership and simplify later administration tasks for successors and trustees.
Many families discover after a death that certain items were never retitled into a revocable living trust despite clear testamentary intent. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the decedent’s trust as the rightful owner of those assets without full probate administration. This process can reduce delay and cost compared with opening a formal probate estate for each asset, and it provides a clear judicial determination that allows trustees to manage, sell, or transfer property according to the trust document. Collierville residents who face this issue can obtain tailored guidance to determine the best path forward.
Filing a Heggstad petition addresses a common problem: assets that were intended to be part of a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name. The petition provides a court order that clarifies ownership, allowing trustees to manage or transfer the property under the trust’s terms. This reduces confusion among heirs, minimizes delays in asset distribution, and can avoid the expense of full probate for each omitted asset. For many families, the petition restores the purpose of the trust and supports a smoother administration, preserving the decedent’s planning instructions while respecting court oversight and creditor notice requirements.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has a long history of assisting clients with estate planning and trust administration matters across California, including San Joaquin County and Collierville. Our team works closely with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to assemble the documentation needed to support a Heggstad petition, prepare the required declarations and exhibits, and present a clear, organized filing to the court. We emphasize practical solutions that resolve title issues efficiently while protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries during post-death administration and asset transfer.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to determine that certain property is the trust’s property despite remaining in the decedent’s individual name. The petition typically accompanies proof such as the trust document, the decedent’s will or pour-over will, deeds, account statements, and declarations from trustees or witnesses. The court reviews the evidence to decide whether the decedent intended the asset to be held in trust and whether transferring title serves the administration of the trust. This judicial determination helps trustees lawfully manage or distribute the property without a separate probate estate process for those items.
Outcomes of a successful Heggstad petition usually include a signed court order confirming that the asset belongs to the trust and directions for transferring title or possession. That order becomes the basis for recording deeds, changing account ownership, or updating titles to reflect the trust. While the petition process provides a streamlined route for many assets, it requires careful documentation and notice to interested persons. Timelines vary depending on court schedules and complexity, but a well-prepared filing can substantially reduce administration overhead and help trustees carry out the decedent’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a legal petition filed in probate court to establish that property titled in the name of a deceased person should instead be treated as trust property. The petition relies on documentary proof that the decedent created a trust, intended the property to be part of that trust, and that the current title does not reflect that intent. The court evaluates facts, hears any objections, and then issues an order that clarifies ownership. That order helps trustees avoid separate probate proceedings for each asset and ensures that the trustee can carry out the trust’s distribution instructions.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically include a verified petition, copies of the trust instrument, deeds or account statements showing current title, declarations from trustees or relevant witnesses, and often a certification of trust or pour-over will. The petitioner must give notice to interested parties and follow local court rules for filings. The court reviews the materials, considers any opposition, and may hold a hearing. If the judge finds the evidence persuasive, an order will be issued directing record changes or recognizing the trust’s ownership, thereby enabling trustees to proceed with asset management and distribution.
Understanding the terminology used in trust administration and Heggstad petitions helps families make informed decisions. Important terms include revocable living trust, pour-over will, certification of trust, trustee, beneficiary, title, probate, and court order. Each term reflects a step or concept in the process of confirming trust ownership and transferring assets. Knowing these definitions will make it easier to gather the right documents, understand court requirements, and communicate clearly with attorneys, trustees, and county recorders when the court order is recorded and title changes are completed.
A revocable living trust is a common estate planning tool that allows an individual to hold and manage assets during life and to direct their distribution after death without necessarily using a full probate process. The person who creates the trust typically serves as trustee while alive and names a successor trustee to take over after death. The trust document contains instructions for managing and distributing assets, which can reduce delays and provide privacy for beneficiaries. Properly retitling assets into the trust during life avoids many post-death title issues that sometimes lead to Heggstad petitions.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize that property titled in a decedent’s name should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended the trust to hold the asset. The petition is supported by evidence such as the trust document, deeds, account statements, and declarations describing the decedent’s intent. When granted, the court issues an order confirming the trust’s ownership and directing the appropriate record changes. This legal mechanism addresses title discrepancies without the need to open a full probate estate for each omitted asset.
A pour-over will is a type of will used in conjunction with a revocable living trust. It ensures that any assets not transferred into the trust during the decedent’s lifetime are directed to the trust upon death. The pour-over will simplifies testamentary intent by funneling residual assets into the trust for distribution under its terms. While a pour-over will can help catch overlooked assets, those still titled in the decedent’s name may require court action such as a Heggstad petition to finalize ownership and permit the trustee to administer the assets according to the trust document.
A certification of trust is a condensed, often recordable document that proves the existence of a trust and identifies the trustee and successor trustee without exposing the full trust terms. It contains enough information for third parties, such as banks or county recorders, to accept actions by the trustee while preserving privacy. When a Heggstad petition is filed, a certification of trust can be used with a court order to update title or provide evidence of the trustee’s authority to transfer assets into the trust or otherwise administer property for beneficiaries.
When addressing assets omitted from a trust, property owners and trustees often face a choice between a targeted Heggstad petition for specific items and broader trust administration actions that address multiple assets and potential disputes. A focused petition can be efficient for isolated assets with clear documentation, whereas a wider approach can handle several issues at once, including title corrections, creditor notice, and resolution of multiple ownership questions. We help clients weigh timelines, cost, evidence, and the interests of beneficiaries to determine whether a narrow petition or more comprehensive filings best serve the family’s objectives.
A limited approach can be appropriate when only one or a few assets were overlooked and documentary evidence plainly shows the decedent intended the trust to hold them. Examples include a single parcel of real estate with a deed that was not updated, a bank account bearing the decedent’s name but designated as trust property in estate records, or a vehicle title that was not retitled. In those cases, a focused Heggstad petition can quickly secure a court order transferring the asset into the trust, minimizing expense and administrative burden while preserving the trust’s overall plan.
When trust documents, witness declarations, and related papers unambiguously reflect the decedent’s intent to include certain assets in the trust, a targeted petition often yields a swift resolution. Courts look for persuasive, consistent evidence that the decedent intended the property to be held by the trust. Clear signatures, contemporaneous correspondence, transfer forms, and consistent asset lists can make a limited petition the most efficient path. Careful assembly of these materials is essential to avoid delay and to give the court confidence when issuing an order recognizing trust ownership.
A comprehensive approach is often required when many assets were left outside the trust, when ownership is unclear, or when titles involve multiple jurisdictions or lenders. Handling a series of title corrections together allows coordination of creditor notices, multiple recordings, and follow-up actions, reducing the risk of missing necessary steps. A larger filing strategy can also address related estate planning instruments, such as pour-over wills and retirement plan beneficiary designations, to ensure all assets are integrated under the trust’s administration and distributed according to the decedent’s plan.
When family members or potential heirs dispute the decedent’s intentions, when creditors assert claims, or when competing documentation exists, a broader legal approach is advisable. Comprehensive representation supports the trustee in managing contested proceedings, negotiating resolutions, and defending the trust’s terms in court if necessary. Such an approach ensures all interested parties receive appropriate notice, helps preserve the rights of beneficiaries, and organizes evidence across multiple assets to present a coherent case to the court for orders that settle ownership and allow administration to proceed.
Taking a comprehensive approach to resolving omitted trust assets can yield benefits such as coordinated resolution of multiple title issues, streamlined creditor notice procedures, and consistent implementation of the trust’s distribution plan. Addressing several assets or disputes together can reduce repeated court appearances and duplicated administrative costs. It also helps ensure that all related instruments—trusts, wills, beneficiary forms—are reviewed together so post-death administration proceeds smoothly and beneficiaries receive distributions according to the decedent’s intentions without unnecessary delay.
A broader strategy supports careful documentation and recordation activities, which minimizes future challenges to title or trustee authority. By consolidating actions, trustees can more effectively manage communications with banks, title companies, and county recorders, ensuring court orders are properly recorded and that asset transfers are legally enforceable. This holistic approach also provides greater assurance to beneficiaries that the process has been handled thoroughly and that the trust’s terms are being followed in a coordinated, legally sound manner.
A comprehensive approach can lower the likelihood that individual assets will trigger separate probate proceedings, because the court can resolve ownership questions in a unified manner for multiple items. This saves time and money for the trust and its beneficiaries by reducing duplicate filings and avoiding repetitive notice requirements. In addition, coordinated administration clarifies the trustee’s authority to handle titles, sell assets if needed, and distribute proceeds, making the process more efficient and reducing the administrative burden on family members during an already difficult time.
Resolving title issues comprehensively produces accurate public records and reliable documentation that will be respected by banks, title companies, and future purchasers. When the trust’s ownership is confirmed and recorded, trustees can proceed confidently with actions like selling property or transferring accounts. This clarity reduces the chance of later disputes and provides beneficiaries with assurance that the decedent’s wishes are being honored. Well-organized records also make ongoing trust administration and future estate planning simpler for successive trustees.
Begin by gathering every document that could show the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust: the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, communications, and any asset lists. A thorough inventory will help identify which items require a Heggstad petition and which are already correctly titled. Clear documentation reduces the time needed to prepare the petition and increases the likelihood of a favorable court ruling. Effective organization of records also streamlines communications with the court and county recorder during title changes.
Heggstad petitions require appropriate notice to interested parties and adherence to creditor notice rules when applicable. Failing to provide required notice can delay proceedings or jeopardize the court’s ability to issue a final order. Coordinate service and publication steps early, identify all potential heirs and known creditors, and create a plan for completing those tasks promptly. Proper notice protects trustees from future claims and helps ensure that the court will enter an order that can be safely recorded to update titles and transfer assets into the trust.
Consider a Heggstad petition if you discover assets that were clearly intended to be in a revocable living trust but remain titled in the decedent’s individual name. Common triggers include deeds, bank or brokerage accounts, or vehicles that were never retitled, or when a pour-over will indicates the trust should receive remaining property. A petition can answer questions about ownership without opening a full probate estate for each asset. If trustees need to manage or transfer overlooked property, the petition provides a legal path to confirm trust ownership and move forward with administration.
You should also consider this service when multiple assets present the same problem, when beneficiaries seek a court order to clear title for sale or transfer, or when a title company requests judicial confirmation prior to completing a transaction. In situations involving potential disputes or unclear records, the petition both protects the trustee’s authority and provides objective court guidance. Early assessment and careful documentation help determine whether a Heggstad petition is the most efficient remedy for integrating overlooked assets into the trust’s administration.
Typical circumstances include real estate left in the decedent’s name despite a trust, bank or investment accounts with old ownership designations, or tangible property that was intended to pass to the trust. Administrative oversights during life, changes in asset ownership, and miscommunication about retitling can all produce the need for a Heggstad petition. Identifying these issues early and assembling the necessary supporting documentation improves the likelihood of a straightforward court order that recognizes the trust’s ownership and allows trustees to take appropriate administrative actions.
Real estate is one of the most common asset types that prompts a Heggstad petition. If the deed was never retitled into the trust and the homeowner intended the property to be trust-owned, a petition can secure a court order confirming the trust’s claim. This makes it possible to record an updated deed reflecting the trust and allows the trustee to manage, sell, or transfer the property in accordance with the trust document. Proper evidence and a clear chain of title increase the likelihood of obtaining the order sought.
Bank and brokerage accounts frequently remain in an individual’s name despite planning that named a trust as beneficiary or owner. Such accounts may carry beneficiary designations that conflict with trust instructions or lack documentation showing the intended transfer. A Heggstad petition can establish that the account belonged to the trust, enabling trustees to access funds for administration, pay debts, or distribute assets to beneficiaries. Bank procedural requirements may also require a court order before accounts can be retitled or closed under the trust’s authority.
Vehicles, boats, or other titled assets that remain in the decedent’s name may also need judicial recognition to be treated as trust property. A Heggstad petition and court order allow trustees to change registration and title records so the trust can lawfully hold, sell, or gift the item according to the trust’s terms. These transfers often require coordination with the Department of Motor Vehicles or other agencies, and having a court order simplifies interactions with third parties by clarifying the trustee’s legal authority to act.
We are available to assist Collierville residents and trustees who face omitted trust assets or unclear titles. Our approach begins with a careful review of the trust, deeds, account statements, and other relevant papers to determine whether a Heggstad petition is warranted. If so, we help assemble the documentation, prepare declarations, manage required notices, and present the petition to the probate court. We focus on clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries and on achieving an outcome that respects the decedent’s estate planning goals while resolving title issues efficiently.
Choosing representation for a Heggstad petition means selecting a firm familiar with California probate court procedures and the specific evidentiary requirements for showing trust ownership. Our office prepares thorough petitions that incorporate clear documentary support and well-drafted declarations, reducing the likelihood of delay or additional court requests. We also coordinate notice to interested parties, which is essential for a valid court order. Our goal is to provide practical, procedural guidance that helps trustees complete administration tasks with minimal disruption to beneficiaries.
We prioritize open communication and responsiveness, keeping trustees informed about steps, timelines, and potential challenges. From initial document gathering to recording the final court order with the county recorder, we manage each stage to ensure compliance with local practice and statutory requirements. This attention to process helps trustees avoid missteps that could otherwise lead to complications or further court involvement. Clients value the clarity and structure we bring to what can otherwise be a confusing administrative process after a loss.
Our legal team works with title companies, banks, and county recorders when necessary to complete the final transfers authorized by the court. We can prepare the recordable documents that the recorder will accept after the judge signs the order, and we follow up to confirm that titles and accounts reflect the trust’s ownership. If disputes arise, we help trustees respond appropriately and seek judicial resolutions that protect the trust’s terms and beneficiaries’ interests, while aiming to keep costs and delays to a minimum.
Our process follows a clear sequence: we review the trust and asset documentation, identify which items require court action, prepare a comprehensive petition with supporting exhibits, serve required notices, and present the filing to the probate court. After obtaining a court order, we assist with recording deeds or coordinating with financial institutions to retitle accounts. Throughout, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed, explain options, and work to complete transfers in a manner that preserves the decedent’s intentions and complies with applicable California procedures.
In the first step we gather the trust document, any pour-over will, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that demonstrates the decedent’s intent. We identify the assets that are still titled in the decedent’s name and evaluate which items are appropriate for a Heggstad petition. This stage includes preparing an inventory, requesting necessary records from third parties when needed, and advising trustees on what declarations or witness statements will be most persuasive for the court.
Collecting complete and accurate copies of the trust instrument, recorded deeds, bank and brokerage statements, vehicle titles, and any related paperwork forms the foundation of a successful filing. We check dates, signatures, and the chain of title to identify any discrepancies. Where records are missing, we suggest efficient steps to obtain certified copies from recorders or financial institutions. Proper document preparation reduces the chance of court follow-up requests and expedites the process toward a definitive order recognizing trust ownership.
We confirm who the trustees and beneficiaries are, identify all interested parties who must be notified under California law, and determine whether creditor notice obligations apply. This helps create a service plan that complies with court rules and statutory notice periods. Accurate identification and notice are essential to obtaining a final court order that will be respected by recorders and third parties. Clear communication to family members and beneficiaries at this early stage often reduces later objections and streamlines the path to resolution.
After document collection and party identification, we draft the verified petition, exhibits, and declarations needed to support the request to the probate court. This includes preparing a clear narrative of the circumstances showing how and why the asset should be treated as trust property. We also prepare any proposed court order and compile recordable documents to be used once the judge signs the order. Attention to the form and substance of filings helps avoid continuances or additional evidence requests from the court.
Our filings present the facts in a concise, organized way that demonstrates the decedent’s intent and the trustee’s authority. Declarations describe how the asset relates to the trust, identify the basis for the trustee’s belief, and attach supporting documents. We ensure that pleadings meet local formatting and verification requirements, which helps the court rule without delay. Well-prepared declarations and exhibits reduce the risk of incomplete rulings and make it easier to obtain a recording-ready order.
Proper service on heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties is a required component of the petition process. We handle the logistics of serving documents in accordance with California statutes and local probate rules, including mailing, personal service when necessary, and publication if required. We also prepare proof of service documents for the court file. Timely and correct notice protects the integrity of the order and reduces the risk of later challenges to the transfer or the trustee’s authority.
Once the petition is filed and notice requirements are met, the court may set a hearing or rule based on the submitted papers. If the judge grants the petition, we obtain a formal order that confirms trust ownership and authorizes record changes. We then assist with recording deeds, updating account registrations, and working with third parties to complete title transfers. Our role continues until the asset titles and records reflect the trust as owner and the trustee can administer the property as directed by the trust.
The court order is the document that resolves the title discrepancy and provides the legal authority trustees need to act. It sets forth the court’s findings that the decedent intended the asset to be trust property and directs the appropriate transfer or recordation. After the judge signs the order, it can be used with county recorders, banks, and title companies to change ownership. Having a clear, properly issued order reduces friction with third parties and helps trustees complete administration tasks without further delay.
Recording the court order and any accompanying deed or instrument with the county recorder, or presenting it to financial institutions, finalizes the transfer of title into the trust. We prepare recordable documents in the format required by recorders and coordinate submission and follow-up. When banks or brokerages require additional steps, we assist in providing the documentation they need to retitle accounts. Completing these recording and transfer actions closes the loop and allows trustees to manage or distribute assets under the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize that property titled in a decedent’s name should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended the trust to hold that asset. This petition is often used when a revocable living trust exists but specific assets were never properly retitled during the decedent’s life. The petition includes the trust document, evidence of ownership, and sworn declarations explaining why the property belongs in the trust. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order if satisfied that the property should be treated as trust property. A Heggstad petition is appropriate when the asset’s title does not match the decedent’s estate plan and when the trustee requires a judicial determination to transfer or manage the item under the trust. It is not needed when assets are already correctly titled in the trust or when beneficiary designations provide a clear and immediate path for transfer. The process provides legal certainty for trustees and third parties such as title companies and banks, allowing for proper record updates and administration.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the assets, the completeness of supporting documentation, and the court’s calendar. In straightforward cases with clear records and no opposition, the filing, notice, and order entry can proceed fairly quickly. However, if additional evidence is requested, interested parties require extended notice, or the court schedules a contested hearing, the process can take longer. Local court practices and current caseloads in San Joaquin County will influence the overall timeline. Working with an attorney to prepare a complete petition and to prioritize required notices and service can reduce delays. Promptly gathering deeds, account statements, and the trust instrument, and identifying all interested parties for notice will move the filing forward efficiently. Regular follow-up with the clerk and careful attention to procedural details also help keep the matter progressing toward a final order that allows trustees to complete title changes and asset administration.
Key documents for a Heggstad petition typically include a copy of the trust instrument, any pour-over will, recorded deeds or title documents for the property at issue, account statements for financial assets, and a certification of trust if available. Declarations from trustees or witnesses describing the decedent’s intent and the circumstances surrounding ownership are also important. When deeds or records are missing, obtaining certified copies from county recorders or financial institutions may be necessary before filing. Additional exhibits may include correspondence, asset inventories, or transfer forms that indicate the decedent intended the trust to own the asset. Proof of death such as a death certificate and identification of trustees and beneficiaries are also required. Ensuring the petition is supported by clear, organized exhibits reduces the chance of court requests for further proof and helps secure an order confirming trust ownership more quickly.
Yes. California law requires that interested parties be notified of probate court proceedings, and Heggstad petitions require service on heirs and beneficiaries who may be affected by the court’s decision. Depending on the circumstances, notice may include mailed service to known heirs and beneficiaries, personal service on certain parties, and, in some cases, published notice when parties cannot be located. Proper notice is essential to ensure the court can enter a final order that will be respected by recorders and third parties. The notice process also provides an opportunity for parties to raise objections if they believe the decedent did not intend the asset to be held in the trust. When disputes arise, additional court proceedings may follow, so clear communication and early outreach to interested persons can reduce surprises. A well-planned notice strategy protects trustees and helps obtain an order that provides clarity for subsequent title changes and administration.
A Heggstad petition can be used for financial accounts, securities, and other assets when those items were intended to be held by the trust but remain in the decedent’s name. The petition must show evidence such as account statements, beneficiary forms, or correspondence that supports the assertion the asset should be treated as trust property. Banks and brokerages may require a court order before they will retitle accounts, and a Heggstad order provides the judicial authority they typically need to proceed with transfers or closures. Because financial institutions often have their own procedures and documentation requirements, trustees should coordinate with the institutions after obtaining the court order to confirm the specific paperwork they need. In some cases, additional affidavits or certifications of trust are required by the institution. Preparing for these steps in advance helps to minimize delays once the court issues the order and the trustee seeks to transfer or distribute account funds.
If someone contests a Heggstad petition, the court may schedule a hearing to receive evidence and argument from all parties. Contested matters can involve disputes about whether the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust, competing claims of ownership, or questions about the trustee’s authority. The litigation may extend timelines and increase cost, and the court will weigh the evidence before deciding whether to grant the requested relief. Preparing thorough documentation and credible declarations at the outset reduces the potential for successful objections. When an objection is raised, parties may explore settlement or alternative dispute resolution to avoid a prolonged hearing. If litigation proceeds, the court will consider witness testimony, documentary evidence, and relevant legal standards to determine ownership. Trustees and beneficiaries should be prepared for additional procedural steps and should consult with counsel to present a coherent case that reflects the decedent’s planning intent.
Yes, a court order is typically required to retitle real property into a trust when the deed remains in the decedent’s name and the title company or county recorder requires judicial confirmation. A Heggstad petition secures that order by demonstrating the decedent intended the trust to hold the property. Once the judge signs the order, it becomes the legal foundation for preparing and recording a new deed that names the trustee or the trust as owner, thereby correcting public records and allowing the trustee to manage or sell the property in accordance with the trust terms. Recording the court order and deed with the county recorder completes the transfer process in public records. Some recorders require specific forms or proof of payment for transfer taxes, so coordination with title companies or the recorder’s office is often necessary. Ensuring the court order and accompanying documents conform to recorder requirements avoids rejections and additional filings, closing out the matter effectively.
Costs for preparing and filing a Heggstad petition vary with complexity, the number of assets involved, and whether the matter is contested. Expenses typically include attorney fees for document review, petition drafting, and court appearances; filing fees; and possible costs for obtaining certified records from third parties. When multiple assets or complex title issues exist, the overall cost increases, but consolidating matters can sometimes reduce cumulative expenses compared to pursuing separate proceedings for each item. It is important to discuss fee expectations up front and to consider whether a targeted petition or a broader approach will be more cost-effective given your circumstances. A clear scope of work and early organization of documents can reduce billable time. In many cases, the savings from avoiding full probate for each omitted asset outweigh the costs of a single, well-prepared petition that resolves title issues efficiently.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for specific assets that were meant to be in the trust but remain improperly titled, but it does not substitute for probate in situations where the decedent had assets that require full estate administration or where creditor claims necessitate probate proceedings. The petition is a targeted remedy focused on demonstrating that particular property belongs to the trust and therefore should be administered under the trust’s terms rather than through a probate estate. For comprehensive avoidance of probate across all assets, careful estate planning during life is required to ensure titles and beneficiary designations align with the trust. When gaps are discovered after death, a Heggstad petition is an effective tool for specific assets, while other items may still need separate handling. Trustees should evaluate their entire portfolio of assets to determine which items require petitions, which can be handled by beneficiary designations, and which might necessitate probate.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition, the judge signs an order that declares the trust’s ownership of the specified assets. That order becomes the basis for recording deeds, updating account registrations, or providing institutions with the authority they need to transfer or distribute property in accordance with the trust. Trustees use the order and any accompanying recordable documents to complete title transfers with county recorders, banks, and brokerages. Following recording, trustees proceed with administration tasks such as paying authorized expenses, distributing assets to beneficiaries under the trust’s terms, or selling property if directed. Proper recordation and follow-up with third parties finalize the process and reduce the likelihood of future disputes about ownership. Trustees should keep organized records of the court order and subsequent recordings for future reference and for any title company inquiries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas