A Heggstad petition can be an important tool when property intended to be in a trust was never formally transferred into it. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition is, why families in Lincoln Village might need one, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with estate planning questions. We focus on clear steps, practical documentation, and court procedures to help protect family assets and ensure trust provisions are carried out according to the settlor’s intentions. Read on to understand common issues and how to address them efficiently.
Many families discover gaps when administering a trust after a loved one passes or when reviewing existing estate plans. A Heggstad petition often arises when title to real property or other assets was not properly transferred to a trust during the settlor’s lifetime. Filing a petition asks the court to recognize that the settlor intended the asset to belong to the trust and to authorize necessary transfers or record changes. This overview outlines typical scenarios, the evidence courts consider, and the practical outcomes clients can expect when a petition is pursued in San Joaquin County.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition helps resolve title issues that can otherwise delay trust administration, create disputes among beneficiaries, or expose assets to probate. By asking the court to confirm that a particular asset was intended to be part of the trust, heirs and trustees can obtain clear authority to manage or sell property and to update public records. This process protects the settlor’s intent, provides legal clarity for third parties such as title companies, and reduces the risk of future litigation. For families in Lincoln Village, a timely petition can preserve estate plan goals and provide smoother administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose assists clients across California with estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions. Our team aims to provide responsive guidance, practical strategies, and clear communication throughout the process. We combine careful document review with tailored filing strategies to address title defects, prepare supporting declarations, and work with county courts and title companies to effectuate transfers. Our goal is to help clients in Lincoln Village achieve the intended distribution of assets while minimizing delays and avoiding unnecessary costs.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used when property that should have been placed into a trust remains titled in the settlor’s name. The petition asks the probate court to recognize that the asset was intended to be trust property and to permit corrective actions, such as rectifying title or recording documents like a certification of trust. The court typically examines the settlor’s declarations, trust terms, and supporting evidence from family members or advisors. This remedy helps uphold the settlor’s plan and can prevent assets from being forced into probate unnecessarily.
The Heggstad procedure can address a variety of assets, including real estate, bank accounts, and certain titled personal property that were not properly transferred. Courts look for clear evidence of intent to place the asset in the trust, such as contemporaneous trust documents, declarations by the settlor, or consistent handling of assets during the settlor’s lifetime. While not every title error will result in a successful petition, careful preparation of declarations and corroborating records improves the likelihood of a favorable court determination and smoother transfer into the trust.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to confirm that property owned by the settlor was intended to be held in trust despite being titled in the settlor’s name. It is rooted in California case law and permits correction of records so trustees and beneficiaries can administer trust property without unnecessary probate proceedings. Filing such a petition typically involves preparing a verified petition, supporting declarations from people with knowledge of the settlor’s intent, and relevant trust documentation. The court’s decision clarifies ownership and allows trustees to take actions consistent with the trust terms.
A well-prepared Heggstad petition relies on several key elements: a clear trust instrument, evidence of the settlor’s intent, supporting declarations from witnesses or professionals, and proper documentation of the asset’s current title. The process generally starts with document review, preparation of the petition and declarations, filing with the probate court, and serving interested parties. The court may set a hearing where the judge evaluates the evidence and issues an order recognizing the trust interest. After approval, records can be updated to reflect trust ownership, enabling trustees to manage the asset smoothly.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the Heggstad process. Important phrases include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, petition, declaration, and title. The settlor is the person who created the trust; the trustee administers it for beneficiaries. A declaration is a written statement supporting the petition, while title refers to the legal ownership of an asset. Becoming familiar with these terms makes it easier to gather relevant evidence, prepare documents, and follow court procedures that lead to recognition of trust ownership and efficient administration.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and contributed assets to it during life. The settlor’s intent, as reflected in the trust document and supporting evidence, is central to a Heggstad petition because courts must determine whether the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Declarations, contemporaneous writings, and consistent handling of assets can help demonstrate that intent. Understanding who the settlor is and how they managed their property is a foundational step in preparing any petition to clarify title and carry out trust provisions.
A trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust and spells out its terms, including who serves as trustee, who receives benefits, and how property is to be managed and distributed. For a Heggstad petition, a clear trust instrument that names the asset or demonstrates intent to include types of property is strong supporting evidence. The instrument’s provisions, signatures, and execution dates are often reviewed by the court to determine whether the asset should be recognized as trust property despite title issues.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed in the trust instrument to manage trust assets for the benefit of named beneficiaries. In a Heggstad matter, a trustee often seeks court recognition that specific property belongs to the trust so they can legally manage, sell, or otherwise administer that property in accordance with the trust terms. The trustee’s duties include gathering evidence of the settlor’s intent, submitting necessary petitions, and acting in the best interests of beneficiaries while following applicable legal procedures.
A declaration is a sworn written statement made under penalty of perjury and typically used to support a Heggstad petition. Declarations may come from the trustee, family members, or professionals who can attest to the settlor’s intent to place an asset into the trust and to circumstances around title. Courts consider the content and credibility of declarations alongside trust documents and other records when deciding whether to recognize trust ownership and authorize corrective transfers or recordings of title.
When title problems arise, families can consider several legal paths, including informal transfers, quiet title actions, probate proceedings, or filing a Heggstad petition. Each option has different timelines, costs, and evidentiary standards. A Heggstad petition is tailored to situations where the settlor intended trust ownership and can sometimes avoid full probate. Quiet title actions focus solely on ownership disputes, while probate handles estate administration when trust remedies are unavailable. Evaluating these choices against case facts helps determine the most practical route to resolve title defects and protect family interests.
A limited filing may be sufficient when there is strong, contemporary documentation showing the settlor intended the asset to be held in the trust. Examples include an executed trust instrument that references the asset, signed schedules, or contemporaneous correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent. When such evidence is compelling, a concise petition supported by reliable declarations can persuade the court without more extensive litigation. This path can shorten timelines and reduce costs while providing the authority needed to update title and proceed with trust administration.
Another situation appropriate for a limited approach is when multiple credible witnesses can provide consistent declarations supporting the settlor’s intent. Witness statements describing conversations, actions taken to fund the trust, or the settlor’s routine handling of the asset can bolster the petition. Courts evaluate the reliability and consistency of these declarations together with documentary evidence. When the combined record strongly indicates trust ownership, the court may grant relief with a streamlined matter rather than extended litigation, benefiting trustees and beneficiaries alike.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when there are disputes about the settlor’s intent or competing claims by heirs, creditors, or third parties. In such circumstances, detailed investigation, robust evidence gathering, and courtroom advocacy may be required to resolve disagreements. Preparing for potential contested hearings, coordinating forensic title research, or pursuing additional remedies like quiet title actions may be part of a broader strategy. The goal is to secure clear legal recognition of trust ownership while addressing competing interests in a way that protects beneficiaries.
When assets have complicated histories, such as multiple title transfers, liens, or involvement of property in other counties, a more comprehensive plan is often needed. Addressing these complexities may involve coordinating with title companies, lienholders, or courts in different jurisdictions. This work can include preparing multiple filings, negotiating settlements with interested parties, and ensuring that any court orders are properly recorded. A thorough approach helps avoid future challenges and ensures trust administration proceeds smoothly across all affected assets and locations.
Taking a comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition can yield several benefits, including more complete resolution of title defects, reduced likelihood of future challenges, and coordinated updates to public records. By addressing related issues upfront—such as unpaid liens, beneficiary disputes, or missing documentation—clients often achieve more durable outcomes. This thoroughness can streamline trust administration after court approval and give trustees greater confidence when making decisions about sale, transfer, or management of trust assets in Lincoln Village and beyond.
A full-service strategy also helps preserve family relationships by reducing uncertainty and preventing prolonged disagreements among heirs. Coordinated communication, careful documentation, and proactive resolution of potential roadblocks can minimize stress and reduce the time needed to complete trust administration. While a comprehensive route may require additional preparation up front, the resulting clarity and finality often translate to lower overall disruption and a more predictable process for trustees and beneficiaries alike when settling the settlor’s affairs.
One major benefit of a comprehensive petition is obtaining a court order that provides clear evidence of trust ownership, which reduces the risk of future litigation or title disputes. When courts issue an order recognizing the trust interest and authorize recording changes, title companies and third parties are better able to rely on those records. This clarity supports efficient transactions, prevents delays in sale or refinancing, and offers beneficiaries greater assurance that the settlor’s wishes will be honored without subsequent challenges.
Comprehensive resolution of title matters empowers trustees with documented authority to manage, encumber, or transfer trust property consistent with trust terms. By addressing related issues such as liens, missing signatures, or incomplete transfers at once, trustees can proceed with administration and distribution without repeated court intervention. This streamlined authority reduces administrative burdens on beneficiaries and helps ensure that the settlor’s instructions are followed promptly, allowing the trust to fulfill its intended purpose effectively for the family.
Begin by collecting all relevant trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any paperwork that shows how the settlor handled the asset during life. Documentation such as a certification of trust, transfer deeds, and correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent can substantially strengthen a petition. Early organization reduces delays, helps uncover additional issues that may require attention, and provides a clear foundation for declarations and filings. Prompt document gathering also allows for timely consultation and a more efficient path to resolving title issues for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Working with title companies and the county recorder’s office early can identify requirements for recording changes after a court order is obtained. Title companies may flag liens, easements, or other encumbrances that must be addressed, while county recorders can provide guidance on acceptable documents and fees. Addressing these items proactively helps ensure the post-judgment transfer process goes smoothly and prevents unexpected obstacles when attempting to sell or refinance property that the court recognizes as trust-owned.
Families often pursue a Heggstad petition to preserve the settlor’s intent and avoid the costs and delays of probate when title defects exist. When assets intended for a trust remain in the settlor’s name, third parties may require legal proof of trust ownership before recognizing transfers or allowing transactions. A successful petition provides judicial recognition that the property belongs to the trust, enabling trustees to manage assets in accordance with the trust terms. This procedure can reduce administrative friction and help ensure beneficiaries receive their intended benefits.
Another common reason to consider filing is to clear title issues that impede real estate transactions such as sales or refinances. Lenders and buyers rely on clear title, and unresolved trust funding can create impediments. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that allows title to be corrected and recorded properly. Addressing these matters proactively protects family assets and simplifies transactions, providing practical and legal certainty for trustees, beneficiaries, and third-party parties involved in transferring or encumbering property.
Typical circumstances include recently discovered title discrepancies after a settlor’s death, missing deeds that were intended to fund a trust, or administrative oversights where assets were never retitled. Other scenarios include properties purchased with trust funds but titled in the settlor’s name, or accounts that should have been payable to a trust but were not updated. In these situations, a Heggstad petition can clarify ownership, enabling trustees to complete necessary management or distribution tasks in line with the settlor’s plan.
One common situation involves real estate that was intended to be owned by the trust but remained titled in the settlor’s personal name, often due to oversight or timing. This can create obstacles for trustees who need to sell, refinance, or transfer property according to the trust terms. Filing a Heggstad petition requests judicial recognition that the property was meant to belong to the trust, enabling record changes and giving trustees clear authority to act on behalf of beneficiaries without entering full probate proceedings.
Another frequent circumstance is when bank accounts, retirement plan distribution designations, or investment accounts were not properly updated to reflect trust ownership or payable-on-death arrangements. These oversights can interfere with efficient administration and distribution. A Heggstad petition or related trust remedy may help clarify the settlor’s intent and allow trustees to access assets for trust purposes. Gathering statements, beneficiary designations, and account opening documents helps support a petition and explains how the settlor handled assets during life.
Sometimes property is purchased using trust funds but the deed or title remains in the settlor’s name because the transfer step was missed at the time of purchase. That creates a situation where the economic reality indicates trust ownership, but the legal title does not. A Heggstad petition can allow a court to recognize the trust’s equitable interest and authorize appropriate recording or transfer instruments. Demonstrating payment records, correspondence, and contemporaneous intent are key to supporting such petitions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance to residents of Lincoln Village and surrounding areas in resolving trust funding and title issues. We focus on clear communication, thorough document review, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s situation. Whether you are a trustee seeking authority to manage trust property or a family member looking to clarify a loved one’s intent, we can help gather the necessary records, prepare a persuasive petition, and navigate county procedures to achieve a workable resolution for trust administration.
Clients work with our firm because we prioritize practical solutions, clear process explanations, and careful preparation of court filings. We help trustees and families gather the documentation courts need, craft persuasive declarations, and coordinate with title companies and county recorders to ensure post-judgment recording is handled correctly. Our aim is to reduce delays and avoid unnecessary litigation by presenting a well-documented case that supports the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiaries’ interests throughout trust administration.
We also assist with related estate planning matters such as creating or updating revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, financial powers of attorney, and advance health care directives to prevent future funding problems. Addressing both immediate title issues and longer-term planning needs helps families avoid similar problems down the road. By coordinating trust corrections with comprehensive estate planning tools, trustees can ensure that assets are managed and distributed in line with the settlor’s wishes.
From preparing Heggstad petitions to recording certifications of trust and assisting with trust modification petitions when appropriate, our approach is focused on clarity and efficiency. We communicate at each step, provide realistic timelines, and work to minimize costs where possible. For residents of Lincoln Village and San Joaquin County, we aim to deliver the practical legal support necessary to resolve title defects and carry out the estate plan in a way that is respectful and transparent for all family members involved.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to identify what evidence exists showing the settlor’s intent. We then outline the information needed, assist with collecting declarations and records, and prepare the petition and supporting exhibits for filing in the appropriate court. After filing, we handle service of process on interested parties, monitor court deadlines, and represent the trustee at hearings if required. Once an order is obtained, we assist with recording the order or related documents to complete the transfer into the trust.
The first step is a comprehensive review of trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that demonstrates the settlor’s intention regarding the asset. This stage also includes identifying potential interested parties and any encumbrances that may affect title. The goal is to build a coherent record that supports the petition, including gathering witness declarations and any contemporaneous evidence. Thorough preparation at this stage increases the likelihood of a favorable court determination and smoother subsequent steps for recording and administration.
We carefully examine the trust instrument, schedules, deeds, and any other documents that touch on ownership or intent. This review seeks to confirm the settlor’s expressed wishes and identify specific language that supports recognizing the asset as trust property. Attention to dates, signatures, and consistency between documents helps build a persuasive case. Any missing or ambiguous items are flagged for additional investigation, and we advise on how to address those gaps through declarations or supplemental evidence to strengthen the petition.
Once documents are reviewed, we collect sworn declarations from people who can attest to the settlor’s intent, such as family members or professionals involved in the settlor’s affairs. We also compile financial records, payment receipts, and communications that corroborate how the asset was handled. The combination of documentary proof and personal declarations provides the court with a clear narrative supporting recognition of the trust interest and facilitates a more efficient review and decision-making process at the hearing stage.
After assembling the petition and supporting exhibits, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate probate court and arrange for service on all interested parties, including beneficiaries and known creditors when required. Proper service ensures that the court has jurisdiction and that interested parties have notice of proceedings. We prepare proof of service documentation and address any responses or objections that may arise, working to negotiate resolutions where appropriate or to proceed to hearing to obtain a judicial determination recognizing the trust interest.
Preparing filings involves drafting a concise petition, attaching the trust instrument and exhibits, and creating well-crafted declarations that present the evidence of intent. Exhibits may include deeds, trust schedules, account statements, or correspondence showing the settlor’s actions. Clear and organized filings help the court evaluate the matter efficiently and can reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings. We focus on presenting facts in a way that supports judicial recognition while complying with local court rules and procedural requirements.
Proper service of the petition on interested parties is essential, and we ensure that service meets statutory requirements. Once parties are served, some may consent or raise objections. We manage communications, attempt to resolve disputes where possible, and prepare responses to formal objections if needed. Where agreements can be reached, stipulations and waivers can shorten the process. If disputes remain, we prepare to present the matter at a hearing with a focus on the documentary and testimonial evidence that demonstrates the settlor’s intent.
At hearing, the court reviews declarations and exhibits, hears any objections, and determines whether the evidence supports recognizing the trust interest. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order authorizing corrective action, which may include directing the county recorder to record transfers or issuing a judgment that clarifies ownership. After the order is obtained, we assist with recording the necessary documents and coordinating with title companies to complete the administrative tasks required to reflect trust ownership in public records.
At the hearing, the judge evaluates the trust instrument, declarations, and supporting records to determine whether the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Our role is to present a clear and organized factual record and to respond to any objections raised by interested parties. Thorough preparation, including anticipating common questions and highlighting corroborating evidence, helps the court reach a reasoned decision. A favorable ruling allows trustees to proceed with administrative tasks that implement the settlor’s plan.
Once the court issues an order, we work to record that order or related instruments with the county recorder and to coordinate with title companies for any further actions such as clearing liens or issuing new title insurance in the name of the trust. Completing these steps ensures the public record reflects the court’s determination and provides the necessary documentation for future transactions involving the property. Proper recording finalizes the transition of title into trust ownership for administration and distribution.
Filing a Heggstad petition in San Joaquin County begins with collecting the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any documents that show the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. The petition is prepared along with sworn declarations from people who have direct knowledge of the settlor’s intentions and the circumstances around the asset. After filing, the petition must be served on interested parties and scheduled for a hearing. The court reviews the documentary and testimonial evidence to determine whether the property should be recognized as belonging to the trust. Preparing a petition also involves addressing any liens, encumbrances, or competing claims that could affect title. Title companies and county recorders may be consulted to understand recording requirements once an order is obtained. Well-organized exhibits, clear declarations, and proactive communication with interested parties increase the chances of a favorable outcome and streamline the post-judgment process of recording documents and updating public records to reflect trust ownership.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the evidence and whether parties contest the petition. In straightforward cases with strong documentary support and no objections, the matter can move through filing, service, and hearing in a matter of weeks to a few months. In more involved situations with contested issues, additional discovery, hearings, or negotiated resolutions may extend the timeline to several months or longer. Local court schedules and service timing also affect how quickly a hearing can be set. Expedited outcomes are more likely when the petition is thoroughly prepared and interested parties agree or do not oppose the requested relief. Early coordination with title companies, obtaining clear declarations, and addressing any obvious title defects in advance all contribute to a more efficient process. If disputes arise, parties may seek to resolve matters through settlement and stipulation, which can reduce the time spent in contested court proceedings and lead to quicker recording of the court’s order.
Courts consider a combination of the trust instrument, contemporaneous records, and sworn declarations when determining whether to recognize trust ownership. The trust document itself is often the most important piece of evidence, especially if it references specific property or includes language indicating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Deeds, schedules, purchase records, and financial statements showing assets were handled as trust property can all support the petition. Declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intent are also critical to corroborate documentary evidence. The court evaluates the credibility, consistency, and timing of the evidence. Clear and contemporaneous documentation tends to be persuasive, while conflicting accounts or missing records raise questions that may require further investigation. Supporting declarations should be specific, sworn under penalty of perjury, and describe concrete facts that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. The overall goal is to present a coherent factual narrative that convinces the judge that the asset was meant to be part of the trust despite the absence of formal transfer.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent certain assets from going through probate by obtaining a judicial recognition that the property belongs to the trust. When the court determines that trust ownership existed despite defective title, the order enables trustees to manage or transfer the asset on behalf of the trust and beneficiaries without administering it through probate court. This outcome saves time and expense that probate can entail and helps ensure distributions proceed according to the trust terms rather than intestate succession rules. However, not every title issue qualifies for a Heggstad remedy. The court must be convinced of the settlor’s intent, and creditors’ rights or other legal claims may still need to be addressed. If evidence of intent is insufficient or if significant disputes exist among interested parties, alternative proceedings such as probate or quiet title may be necessary. Careful preparation and strong supporting documentation improve the likelihood that a petition will keep the asset within the trust framework.
Not all beneficiaries need to consent for a Heggstad petition to proceed, but notice and service requirements mean interested parties will be informed and have the opportunity to object. Some beneficiaries may sign waivers or stipulations that streamline the process, but when objections arise the court will evaluate the evidence and any opposing arguments. Consent can make the process faster and less contentious, but the absence of unanimous agreement does not automatically prevent a properly supported petition from succeeding. When objections occur, the matter may require additional evidence, negotiation, or contested hearings. Courts weigh the settlor’s intent and the strength of supporting documents against the objections presented. Parties seeking resolution should be prepared to present declarations, records, and a clear factual narrative to address any concerns and demonstrate why the trust interest should be recognized despite title defects.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary by complexity, local court filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Basic expenses include court filing fees, costs for serving notices on interested parties, and potential title or recording fees after an order is obtained. If additional work is required, such as obtaining declarations, coordinating with title companies, or addressing liens, those efforts can increase costs. When parties agree and the petition is straightforward, overall expenses tend to be lower than prolonged litigation or full probate administration. Contested matters involving hearings, discovery, or negotiations will generally incur higher fees due to the additional time and effort required. Early organization of documents, gathering clear declarations, and attempting to resolve disputes by agreement can help control costs. Providing a transparent fee estimate and discussing case strategy up front allows trustees and families to make informed decisions about the resources needed to pursue the petition.
If someone objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection alongside the supporting evidence and may schedule a hearing to resolve contested issues. Objections can raise questions about the settlor’s intent, competing claims of ownership, or potential creditor interests. When objections are filed, parties may seek to negotiate settlements, present additional evidence, or proceed to a contested hearing where the judge evaluates declarations and documentary proof to reach a decision. Resolving objections often requires careful preparation of additional supporting records, witness testimony, or legal briefing to address specific challenges. Where appropriate, parties may reach stipulations or clarified agreements that narrow disputed issues and expedite resolution. If no agreement is possible, the court’s adjudication will determine whether the property should be recognized as trust-owned or whether alternate remedies, such as probate or quiet title, are needed.
A Heggstad petition can be used to correct title for properties located in different counties, but each county’s recorder, local title requirements, and court jurisdictional considerations may affect the procedure. When a property is in another county, filings and recordings may need to be coordinated across jurisdictions, and local recorders may have different standards for accepted documents. Working with local counsel or coordinating filings with the appropriate recorder’s office helps ensure the post-judgment recording process is completed correctly in each county where the property is located. Complexities increase when assets span multiple jurisdictions, including potential differences in title issues, lien priorities, or applicable local rules. Proper planning, early communication with title companies, and understanding county-specific recording requirements help avoid delays and additional costs. Courts generally expect accurate documentation and proper recording in each relevant county to effectuate the transfer into the trust as authorized by the orderly process.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include pursuing a quiet title action, probate administration, or attempting informal corrective transfers when permitted by title companies. Quiet title actions address ownership disputes and can remove clouds on title but may involve different procedures and standards. Probate may be necessary when trust remedies are unavailable or when the estate’s administration must occur through court-supervised proceedings. In some cases, parties can negotiate direct transfers with title companies if the documentation meets their risk criteria, avoiding court altogether. Choosing among alternatives depends on the facts, evidence of intent, potential objections, and the desired outcome. A quiet title action might be appropriate when ownership disputes extend beyond trust-related intent, whereas probate addresses scenarios where trust remedies cannot fully substitute for estate administration. Exploring options with careful consideration of timelines, costs, and outcomes helps select the best route for each family’s situation.
To avoid the need for a Heggstad petition in the future, ensure trust funding steps are completed when creating or updating a trust. This includes retitling real property, updating account ownership where possible, signing deed transfers, and preparing a certification of trust for use with title companies. Keeping an up-to-date inventory of assets, beneficiary designations, and consistent documentation helps prevent the common oversights that lead to title defects. Regular reviews of estate planning documents and transactions reduce the chance that assets will be left out of a trust inadvertently. Working with counsel or advisors during major transactions, such as purchasing real property or changing account ownership, can help confirm that transfers occur correctly. Clear instructions, record keeping, and contemporaneous documentation showing the settlor’s intent are valuable if questions later arise. Proactive steps provide smoother administration for trustees and greater certainty that the settlor’s wishes will be realized without the need for corrective court proceedings.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas