A Heggstad petition provides a path to have assets transferred to a trust when property intended for a living trust was not properly retitled before a person passed away. In Lockeford and throughout San Joaquin County, families confront delays and uncertainty when a decedent’s property remains in their individual name rather than in a trust. This introduction explains the petition’s purpose, the typical court process, and how a petition can help preserve the trust creator’s intent. If you are dealing with an estate where assets were left out of a trust, understanding the Heggstad process can reduce delays and help your family move forward with the estate plan’s original goals.
Many California families assume assets will automatically pass to a trust after death, but when paperwork or title transfers were not completed, those assets may remain subject to probate court administration. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that certain assets should have belonged to the trust and therefore pass according to the trust’s terms. In Lockeford, filing this petition can be an efficient solution to avoid full probate proceedings on specific assets and to align how property is ultimately distributed with the decedent’s documented intentions. This section sets expectations about timing, common outcomes, and the types of documentation courts typically consider.
A Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate and honor the trust creator’s design for asset distribution, often saving time and legal expense compared with administering property through full probate. In practice, the petition allows a court to confirm that particular assets were meant to be part of a decedent’s revocable living trust or other estate plan document. For families in Lockeford, that confirmation can simplify title transfers, allow asset management to continue under successor trustees, and reduce the risk of disputes over ownership. Additionally, resolving these issues sooner preserves estate value by minimizing administrative costs and potential delays that could harm beneficiaries.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we focus on practical estate planning and trust administration matters for residents of San Joaquin County and the greater Bay Area. Our approach prioritizes clear communication, careful document review, and strategic court filings when a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We work with trustees, personal representatives, and family members to assemble the records a court will evaluate, such as trust instruments, deeds, transfer documents, and credible evidence of the decedent’s intent. Our goal is to move matters toward resolution in a manner that protects family relationships and the integrity of the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to determine that certain property should be considered part of a trust despite not being retitled before the decedent’s death. The petition process examines evidence such as the trust instrument, contemporaneous transfer forms, declarations of intent, and the circumstances around why transfer did not occur. For Lockeford residents, the petition can be used for bank accounts, real property, retirement accounts, and other assets that were meant to be included in the trust but remained in the individual’s name. Understanding how courts evaluate intent and documentation is essential for predicting likely outcomes and preparing a persuasive filing.
The Heggstad procedure is often narrower than full probate and focuses on specific assets rather than an estate-wide administration. Courts review admissible evidence to decide whether an asset should have been part of the trust at death. This may include copies of the trust, deeds, beneficiary designations, and witness declarations about the decedent’s statements or actions. In Lockeford, this route can minimize public proceedings and honor the privacy often associated with trust administration. It is also an option when heirs and trustees agree about the decedent’s intent and want to avoid the cost and delay of probate on limited property.
A Heggstad petition is a petition to the probate court seeking a judicial declaration that particular assets belonged in a trust despite not having been formally transferred before death. California courts examine the trust document, related transfer paperwork, statements of the decedent, and the surrounding facts to determine whether there was an intent to transfer. The standard of proof is based on admissible evidence showing that the decedent’s actions or documentation reflected the intent to fund the trust. The petition helps align title and distribution of property with the trust’s provisions without resorting to broad probate measures when only certain assets are affected.
When preparing a Heggstad petition, the court and filing parties focus on specific elements such as the existence and terms of the trust, documentation of intended transfers, the decedent’s declarations, and any contemporaneous transfer receipts. Other important items include deeds, assignment documents, beneficiary designations, and records that show the trust was funded in other respects. The process generally involves gathering evidence, drafting a petition and proposed order, serving notice on interested parties, and attending a hearing where the judge will evaluate whether the facts support a judicial declaration that the asset belonged in the trust at death.
Understanding technical terms makes the Heggstad process easier to navigate. This glossary explains common phrases used in petitions and court proceedings, including terms about trusts, title transfers, and probate filings. Knowing the meaning of these items helps trustees and family members assemble the right documents and communicate effectively with the court and other parties. It also helps set expectations about what evidence courts find persuasive and how a petition may affect distribution and asset management within the trust framework.
A Heggstad petition is a formal request to the probate court to declare that certain assets which were not retitled before death should nonetheless be treated as trust property. The petition relies on evidence of intent to fund the trust, and its purpose is to allow those assets to be distributed under the trust’s terms rather than through probate. The procedure is typically used when the omission affects specific assets and the parties seek a focused judicial resolution. The petition must be supported by relevant documentation and, when necessary, declarations from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent.
Trust funding refers to the act of transferring legal title or beneficiary designations so that assets are owned by or payable to the trust. Proper funding ensures the trust controls assets during the creator’s life and at death according to the trust terms. In cases where funding was incomplete, a Heggstad filing addresses those incomplete transfers by presenting evidence that the decedent intended the assets to be part of the trust. Documentation showing steps toward funding, such as transfer forms or communications with financial institutions, strengthens a petition and clarifies how assets should be handled.
A successor trustee is the person or entity named in a trust to manage and distribute trust assets after the trust’s creator becomes incapacitated or dies. When assets remain in the decedent’s name instead of the trust, the successor trustee may need to pursue a Heggstad petition to obtain a court declaration that those assets belong to the trust. The successor trustee’s responsibilities include gathering records, documenting intent, and coordinating filings. Clear evidence of the decedent’s expressions or actions regarding the trust can help the successor trustee demonstrate the trust’s intended ownership of contested assets.
A probate court declaration is an order entered by a judge that clarifies the legal status of assets, beneficiaries, or rights when ownership or distribution is in dispute. In a Heggstad petition, the court’s declaration resolves whether assets should be treated as trust property despite not being retitled. This judicial determination allows trustees to proceed with trust administration for those assets and helps beneficiaries receive distributions according to the trust. The declaration becomes part of the public record and is typically used to instruct financial institutions and county recorders to transfer title or accounts to the trust.
A Heggstad petition is often the preferred route when the facts support the conclusion that an asset was intended to belong to a trust but was unintentionally left in the decedent’s name. Probate administration handles estate settlement more broadly and can be costlier and lengthier. Agreements among heirs can avoid litigation but require full transparency and documentation. Choosing among these pathways depends on the property involved, the clarity of intent documentation, potential creditor claims, and the family’s ability to resolve disputes outside of court. Courts typically favor procedures that best respect the decedent’s documented plan while protecting interested parties.
A limited Heggstad filing is often sufficient when the decedent left clear written records showing intent to transfer certain assets into a trust but failed to complete title changes. Examples include contemporaneous transfer forms, a trust provision specifically listing the asset, or persistent communications with financial institutions about funding. When such documentation exists, a court can often resolve ownership for those assets without opening a broad probate administration. This focused approach minimizes expense and time, and allows trustees to carry out the trust terms for the identified property while keeping other estate matters separate.
A Heggstad petition is more straightforward when beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties agree that certain assets were intended for the trust and consent to judicial relief. Agreement reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and can streamline documentation and court procedures. When family members and potential heirs are aligned, a streamlined filing can secure a declaration that the asset belongs to the trust and allow distribution under the trust’s terms. Cooperation also helps avoid extended litigation, preserves family relationships, and generally results in a faster resolution for the affected property.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when several assets are contested, title issues affect the majority of the estate, or competing claims by creditors or heirs complicate distribution. In such circumstances, the court may require a full probate administration to ensure all parties receive notice and that claims are resolved in an orderly manner. Handling these situations requires more extensive filings and representation to manage creditor notifications, asset inventory, and distribution orders. When many assets are involved or when disputes are severe, pursuing broader legal relief ensures that all legal requirements are satisfied and that the estate is properly closed.
Complex trust arrangements, layered beneficiary designations, or multiple interrelated estate documents can demand a comprehensive legal plan to ensure proper administration. When trust amendments, retirement account beneficiary issues, or competing trust instruments create uncertainty, the court may need detailed analysis to determine how assets should be distributed. Handling these matters requires a careful review of documents like irrevocable life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts, pour-over wills, and other arrangements. A broader process helps reconcile conflicting provisions and allows the court to issue clear orders covering all relevant assets and interests.
A comprehensive legal approach can address overlapping issues, provide clarity for all interested parties, and reduce the risk of future disputes by resolving conflicts in a single proceeding. In situations with complex documentation or multiple contested assets, consolidating claims and rulings into one process helps create a clear path forward. This approach can also allow the court to consider creditor claims, tax consequences, and beneficiary rights together, producing resolutions that account for all relevant factors. For families dealing with complicated estate situations, the comprehensive route offers the benefit of finality and a coordinated resolution.
Comprehensive resolution supports thorough documentation and proper court orders that financial institutions and recorders will accept, which can prevent relitigation of the same issues later. By addressing title, beneficiary designations, and contested matters in one proceeding, trustees and beneficiaries gain a defensible judicial record that supports subsequent transfers and distributions. This prevents fragmented rulings and reduces the chance that unresolved disputes will resurface. For those with multiple asset types or interdependent documents, a comprehensive legal strategy helps achieve enforceable, court-backed conclusions that protect the estate’s integrity.
Comprehensive proceedings produce court orders that clearly state how assets should be treated, providing a legal foundation for transfers and distributions that financial institutions will follow. Those orders reduce uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries and lower the risk of future challenges by setting a definitive, public legal record. By resolving related issues together, courts can also consider the broader context of the estate and prevent piecemeal litigation. For families in Lockeford, obtaining a clear judicial determination provides stability and helps preserve estate value by avoiding repeated legal contests over the same property.
A comprehensive approach allows for coordinated handling of tax consequences, creditor claims, and beneficiary entitlements in one forum, which can streamline administration and reduce administrative overhead. Courts can balance competing interests, set deadlines for creditor claims, and approve distributions that account for financial obligations. Addressing these matters together helps avoid surprises for beneficiaries and provides a complete account of how assets were administered. This coordination is particularly helpful when assets have overlapping claims or complex titling that could otherwise create delays or unanticipated liabilities.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, deeds, transfer forms, beneficiary designations, bank statements, and any written or recorded communications that demonstrate the decedent’s intentions. Early assembly of these materials makes it easier to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and helps prepare a complete filing. Having clear documentation reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and improves the court’s ability to decide the matter efficiently. For families in Lockeford, acting promptly also helps preserve bank records and witness recollections that can be important to the court’s evaluation.
A Heggstad petition requires notice to interested parties who may object or raise competing claims, so anticipate the need to notify heirs, creditors, and other potential stakeholders. Preparing clear supporting declarations and an organized evidentiary package helps respond to objections efficiently. If objections arise, the court will evaluate competing evidence, so maintaining thorough documentation and credible witness statements strengthens the petitioner’s position. Being proactive about notice and potential challenges reduces surprises and supports a smoother resolution in court if disagreement occurs.
Families consider a Heggstad petition when they want a focused legal remedy to treat specific assets as trust property without opening broad probate administration. This route is often chosen to avoid the time and expense of probating limited assets and to allow trustees to distribute property under the trust’s terms. It is also attractive when documentation supports the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, or when heirs and trustees are largely in agreement. For residents of Lockeford, the petition path can help preserve estate value and align final distributions with the decedent’s documented wishes.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to secure clear legal authority for transferring assets that remained in the decedent’s name, enabling banks and recorders to accept trust-based transfers with a court order. In many cases, obtaining a judicial declaration is sufficient to instruct institutions to retitle accounts or property to the trust. When timing and asset protection matter, this procedure can reduce delays in accessing resources needed for final expenses, creditor claims, or beneficiary distributions, providing practical benefits during estate administration.
Common circumstances include overlooked deeds that were never recorded in the trust’s name, bank accounts still held in the decedent’s personal name despite trust planning, and retirement accounts or insurance proceeds with outdated beneficiary designations. It also arises when the decedent signed transfer documents but failed to complete steps to finalize the funding. These scenarios create a gap between the decedent’s estate plan and the actual ownership of assets at death, and a Heggstad petition can bridge that gap by proving the decedent intended those assets to be subject to the trust’s terms.
Sometimes a house or parcel remains titled in the decedent’s name even though the trust document references it or the decedent intended to transfer it. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the property should be administered under the trust, enabling the successor trustee to manage, sell, or distribute the property according to the trust’s instructions. The petition typically includes deeds, trust provisions, and declarations showing the decedent’s intent to ensure the court understands the relationship between the trust and the property.
Financial accounts are often overlooked when funding a trust, and when accounts remain in the decedent’s name they can become subject to probate. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to treat these accounts as if they were trust assets by presenting statements, transfer requests, or communications that reflect intent. Such a judicial declaration helps the successor trustee access funds for expenses, creditor payments, or beneficiary distributions while following the trust’s terms, avoiding the need to include those accounts in a broader probate estate administration.
A common scenario involves signed documents or declarations indicating that the decedent intended to fund the trust but final steps were not completed, such as missing notarization, unrecorded deeds, or incomplete beneficiary designations. A Heggstad petition presents the available proof of intent alongside the trust instrument to convince the court that the asset should be treated as trust property. Courts consider both written and testimonial evidence about the decedent’s actions and statements, and a well-prepared petition frames that proof in a clear and persuasive way to achieve the desired declaration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist Lockeford residents with targeted probate filings such as Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We aim to provide responsive guidance about documentation, notice requirements, and likely timelines so trustees and families can make informed decisions. Our services include reviewing trust and estate documents, preparing petitions and notices, and representing clients at hearings when necessary. For those seeking to confirm that assets belong in a trust, we help assemble an evidentiary record designed to meet the court’s standards and facilitate orderly trust administration.
Clients work with our firm because we emphasize practical solutions that align with the client’s goals for timely trust administration and orderly asset transfer. We focus on meticulous document review and thoughtful preparation of petitions to present the strongest possible evidence of the decedent’s intent. Our process includes clear explanations of court procedures and anticipated timelines so trustees and beneficiaries know what to expect. By prioritizing efficient and thorough preparation, we help families in Lockeford pursue judicial declarations that allow trust distributions to proceed with fewer delays.
We handle the procedural steps required for a Heggstad filing, including preparing the petition and supporting declarations, serving required notices to interested parties, and presenting the matter at hearing if needed. Our goal is to manage the administrative burden so trustees can focus on practical estate matters and family communication. We work to minimize disputes through clear documentation and pre-filing communication, and when litigation is necessary we advocate for resolution that reflects the decedent’s documented plan. Clients appreciate our clear guidance through each stage of the process.
Our firm also assists with related trust and estate documents that often accompany Heggstad matters, such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certification of trust, and deeds. Addressing these interconnected items helps ensure the court’s order will be effective in directing transfers and supporting long-term trust administration. We advise trustees on follow-up steps after a successful petition to update records with banks and county recorders, helping preserve continuity in asset management and distribution under the trust’s terms.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate for the assets at issue. We identify the strongest evidence of intent, organize supporting declarations and records, prepare the petition and proposed order, and manage service and filing requirements. We keep clients informed about timelines, potential objections, and possible outcomes. When hearings are necessary, we present the evidence to the court and respond to any challenges. Our objective is to secure a judicial declaration that allows trust-based administration of the identified assets.
The first step is to gather all relevant documents, including the trust instrument, deeds, bank statements, beneficiary forms, and any signed transfer paperwork. We assess the strength of available evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and recommend whether a Heggstad petition or another pathway is most appropriate. During this stage we also identify interested parties who must receive notice and evaluate potential objections or competing claims so we can plan a strategic filing and prepare necessary declarations.
We closely examine the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, and transfer documents to determine the relationship between the trust and the asset. This step includes confirming successor trustee appointments and looking for evidence that funding was intended, such as contemporaneous correspondence or transfer receipts. A careful review helps highlight any gaps that need to be addressed before filing and identifies the key pieces of evidence the court will likely rely on when evaluating intent and ownership.
Identifying beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and other interested parties is essential because a Heggstad petition requires proper notice so those with potential claims can respond. We compile a list of parties to be served and ensure notices meet statutory requirements in order to avoid procedural challenges. Proper notice reduces the risk of later disputes and gives interested parties the opportunity to raise objections, which the court will consider before granting any declaration regarding the asset’s ownership.
In step two we draft the petition, supporting declarations, exhibits, and a proposed order tailored to the asset and the evidence. The petition explains the facts, cites relevant law, and presents the documentation demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We then file the petition with the probate court and serve required notices on interested parties. Precise drafting and comprehensive exhibits improve the likelihood of a favorable judicial declaration and help the process move forward efficiently.
Supporting declarations from trustees, witnesses, or institutional representatives establish the factual basis for the petition and clarify the decedent’s intent. Exhibits typically include the trust document, deeds, transfer paperwork, and relevant account records. These materials are organized to present a coherent narrative to the court and are carefully cross-referenced in the petition. Strong supporting documentation reduces the need for evidentiary hearings and helps the judge rule on the petition based on the written record when possible.
After finalizing the petition and exhibits, we file them with the appropriate county probate court and ensure all interested parties receive legally sufficient notice. Proper service protects the petition from procedural objections and gives potential opponents an opportunity to respond. We monitor deadlines for responses and prepare any necessary replies or supplemental documentation. Thorough attention to filing and service formalities helps avoid unnecessary delays and positions the petition for a timely hearing.
The final step is the court hearing where the judge evaluates the submitted evidence and any objections. We present the case, answer questions, and provide legal argument showing why the asset should be declared trust property. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order reflecting that determination, which can then be used to retitle assets or instruct institutions to transfer funds to the trust. We then assist with implementing the order, including recording deeds or presenting the order to banks to complete transfers.
At the hearing we ensure the judge has the clearest possible picture of the decedent’s intent by highlighting key documents and declarations. We explain how the factual record supports recognition of the asset as trust property and address any objections raised by interested parties. Courts weigh whether the evidence demonstrates that the decedent intended the trust to own the asset, and presenting a coherent evidentiary narrative maximizes the chance of a favorable ruling. We also request any clarifying orders needed to effectuate transfers.
Once the court issues a declaration, we assist with the practical steps to implement the order, such as recording the order with the county recorder or providing it to financial institutions to retitle accounts. This follow-through ensures the court’s determination has the intended legal effect and that trustees can manage or distribute the assets under the trust. Completing these administrative tasks helps conclude the matter and prevents future disputes about the ownership or disposition of the affected property.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing that asks a probate court to declare certain assets should be treated as trust property even though they were not formally retitled before the decedent’s death. The petition relies on evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust and is used when specific assets were meant to be in the trust but were omitted from formal transfer steps. This procedure allows targeted court relief for identified assets and seeks to align distribution with the trust terms without initiating broad probate for the entire estate. The petition is typically used when the trust instrument and related documents show the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust, but the title remained in the decedent’s name. Courts evaluate written documents, transfer attempts, and witness statements to determine intent. When the petition succeeds, the court issues an order that enables the trustee to transfer or distribute the asset under the trust, avoiding the need to treat that specific asset through general probate administration.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the court’s schedule, the completeness of the filing, and whether objections arise. In San Joaquin County, an uncontested petition that is well-documented may move relatively quickly through the filing and hearing process, but exact timelines depend on local court calendars and the need for any supplemental evidence. Preparing a thorough petition and serving proper notice helps avoid procedural delays and can reduce the time to resolution. If objections are filed or competing claims exist, the process can take longer due to briefing, evidentiary hearings, and possible litigation. It is also important to allow time for creditors and other interested parties to be notified according to statutory requirements. We advise clients to plan for potential delays and to gather documentation early to support a timely hearing and favorable decision.
Courts generally find the most persuasive evidence to be contemporaneous written documents such as the trust instrument, deeds showing intended transfer, and completed transfer forms. Correspondence or records from financial institutions indicating intent to fund the trust and declarations from those with personal knowledge of the decedent’s intent can also be influential. The stronger and more specific the documentary record, the more likely a court will accept that the asset was intended to be part of the trust. Testimonial declarations from individuals who can speak to the decedent’s statements or actions at relevant times supplement documentary evidence. When records are incomplete, credible witness declarations that describe consistent actions or communications can help the court reach a finding of intent. Organizing these materials clearly in the petition improves the court’s ability to evaluate the claim efficiently.
A successful Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific assets addressed by the petition by obtaining a court order that treats those assets as trust property. However, it does not necessarily avoid probate for the entire estate if other assets remain in the decedent’s name or if there are unrelated contested matters. The petition provides targeted relief, which is particularly useful when only certain items were omitted from funding the trust. If most or all significant assets are addressed through Heggstad petitions or were already in the trust, the need for full probate may be reduced or eliminated. Each case is unique, and whether probate is avoided depends on the total estate situation, creditor claims, and other legal requirements that may apply to remaining assets.
Proper notice is essential when filing a Heggstad petition. Interested parties typically include trustees, beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, known creditors, and any person or entity with a potential claim against the asset in question. Notice procedures follow statutory rules and ensure that persons with an interest in the property have an opportunity to object or present competing evidence to the court. Failure to serve required notice can result in procedural delays or a court refusing to act on the petition until proper service is completed. Identifying all potential interested parties early and adhering to the required service methods protects the petition from procedural challenges and helps the court proceed with a full record for decision-making.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and any supporting evidence presented by the objector before making a decision. Objections often raise questions about the sufficiency of evidence, competing claims to ownership, or procedural defects in notice or filing. When objections are filed, the petitioner may need to submit additional evidence, respond in writing, or attend a contested hearing where the judge weighs the competing proofs and arguments. Contested hearings can extend the timeline and increase costs, but the court’s role is to evaluate evidence objectively and issue a declaration based on the preponderance of admissible proof. Preparing a thorough evidentiary record and anticipating likely objections reduces the likelihood of protracted proceedings and improves the chance of a favorable resolution at hearing.
Heggstad petitions can be used for certain retirement accounts and insurance proceeds in limited situations, particularly when documentation or beneficiary designations demonstrate the decedent intended the trust to receive those assets. However, retirement accounts and insurance policies often have their own beneficiary designations that control disposition, so the specific facts and contract terms matter. Courts will examine whether the decedent’s actions and trust documents clearly indicate an intent to designate the trust as beneficiary or to have the asset treated as trust property. Because these asset types are governed by plan documents or policy terms, additional analysis is required to determine whether a petition is the appropriate remedy. It may be necessary to coordinate with plan administrators or insurers to understand options. In some cases, changes to beneficiary designations prior to death would have been required, while in others a judicial declaration may be appropriate to align administration with the trust’s terms.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary by case complexity, the attorney time required, and whether the matter is contested. Filing fees, service costs, and potential costs for drafting declarations or obtaining records also affect the total. An uncontested petition with clear documentation and minimal court appearances typically involves lower overall expense, while contested matters or those requiring extensive evidence and hearings carry greater costs. We provide transparent estimates after reviewing the specific facts and documents relevant to the petition. It is important to consider potential savings when comparing a Heggstad petition to full probate administration, which can be more time-consuming and costly. For specific cost estimates and payment options, parties should consult with counsel who can evaluate the estate’s composition and the expected scope of work required to prepare and prosecute the petition effectively.
After a successful Heggstad petition, the successor trustee should record the court order where appropriate, present the order to financial institutions to retitle accounts, and update property records to reflect trust ownership. The trustee should also communicate the result to beneficiaries and maintain a record of the court order and related filings for future reference. Taking these administrative steps ensures the court’s determination has practical effect and that assets can be managed and distributed per the trust terms. Trustees should also review the trust and related documents to determine if additional transfers or filings are necessary and to ensure compliance with any conditions set by the court. Keeping detailed records of the post-order steps helps prevent future disputes and supports a smooth continuation of trust administration and beneficiary distributions in accordance with the trust.
To begin the Heggstad petition process in Lockeford, gather the trust instrument, any deeds or transfer paperwork, account statements, and any communications or documents showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Contact counsel to review these materials and to discuss whether a petition is the most appropriate remedy for the asset in question. An early review helps identify interested parties, notice requirements, and likely evidentiary needs for a successful petition. Once counsel confirms a petition is appropriate, they will prepare the filing, coordinate service on interested parties, and represent the matter at hearing if necessary. Preparing a complete and organized evidentiary packet and following statutory notice procedures increases the likelihood of a timely resolution and minimizes the potential for procedural delays.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas