A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used when a decedent’s assets were intended to pass to a trust but were instead left in the decedent’s name at death. This situation can create unintended probate exposure and delays for beneficiaries who expected trust administration instead of court-supervised distribution. Residents of Morada and surrounding San Joaquin County communities turn to structured solutions to confirm that assets belong to the trust, allowing trustees and beneficiaries to move forward with trust administration in a timely way. This paragraph explains why a Heggstad petition matters for avoiding extra legal hurdles and clarifying title issues.
When a trustmaker intended assets to be transferred into a trust but the paperwork was incomplete or property remained titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can be filed in the appropriate probate or superior court. The petition asks the court to find that those assets were part of the trust despite being titled differently, which allows the trustee to administer trust property without unnecessary probate. For families in Morada, this process can protect estate plans and provide a legal pathway to honor the decedent’s wishes while minimizing time and expense for heirs and fiduciaries.
A properly handled Heggstad petition can restore the intended operation of a trust after a decedent’s death by confirming that certain assets were meant to be trust property. This process helps avoid full probate for assets that were intended to avoid it, reducing time spent in court and lowering costs for the estate and beneficiaries. It also clarifies legal title so banks, county recorders, and other institutions will release or transfer assets to the trustee. For trustees and beneficiaries, a Heggstad petition provides legal certainty and supports the orderly administration of the trust according to the trustmaker’s expressed plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve individuals and families across California, including residents of Morada, with estate planning and trust administration matters. The firm focuses on helping clients navigate documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related filings like Heggstad petitions when title discrepancies occur after death. The firm assists trustees and beneficiaries through court proceedings, document preparation, and coordination with financial institutions to transfer assets properly. Clients receive clear guidance on practical steps to move estate administration forward while preserving the intent of the trustmaker.
A Heggstad petition asks a court to declare that certain property belonged to a trust even though it might still be titled in the decedent’s name or otherwise not formally transferred. The petition typically includes evidence such as trust documents, deeds, account statements, or affidavits that show the trustmaker’s intent and acts taken to place the asset in the trust. The court examines whether the property was meant to be part of the trust and whether any transfer steps were overlooked. A favorable ruling enables the trustee to treat the property as trust property for distribution and administration purposes.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves understanding procedural requirements and preparing supporting documentation that demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent. The petition process may include notifying interested parties, presenting proof to the court, and addressing objections if they arise. Timing can vary depending on court schedules and whether additional evidence is required. For trustees and beneficiaries, preparing a thorough petition reduces the risk of delays and increases the likelihood that the court will issue an order allowing the property to be handled under the trust terms rather than entering into probate administration for those assets.
A Heggstad petition formally asks a court to declare that specific property constitutes trust assets and should be administered according to the trust instrument rather than through probate. The petition sets out facts about the trust, the decedent’s actions, and why the asset is properly treated as trust property despite its current title. Courts will consider documents, witness statements, and the totality of evidence when determining whether to grant the petition. If the petition succeeds, the trustee gains clear authority to manage or distribute the asset in line with the trust’s provisions, providing closure and direction for beneficiaries.
Critical elements in a Heggstad petition include a clear statement of the trust’s terms, evidence of the trustmaker’s intent, documentation of any transfer attempts, and an explanation of why the asset remains in the decedent’s name. The process generally begins with gathering relevant records, notifying potential interested parties, and drafting a petition that anticipates likely questions from the court or objections from heirs. The petitioner will present declarations and supporting exhibits and may need to attend a hearing. Proper preparation helps streamline the court’s decision and supports a smooth transition of the asset into trust administration.
Understanding the terminology used in trust and probate matters makes it easier to follow the Heggstad petition process. Definitions clarify roles such as trustee and beneficiary, describe documents like the trust and deed, and explain legal processes such as title transfer and court declaration. Familiarity with these terms helps trustees and family members gather the right information, respond to requests from financial institutions, and present a coherent petition to the court. The glossary below highlights commonly used words and phrases to help you navigate the matter.
A trust is a written instrument in which a trustmaker transfers legal title to property to a trustee to hold and manage for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to the trust’s terms. Revocable living trusts, commonly used in estate planning, allow the trustmaker to retain control during life and provide instructions for distribution after death. A trust document typically identifies assets that should be administered under the trust, naming successor trustees to carry out fiduciary duties. In Heggstad petition scenarios, the trust document is a central piece of evidence to demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent for asset distribution.
A trustee is an individual or entity appointed to hold and manage trust property on behalf of beneficiaries in accordance with the trust terms. The trustee has fiduciary obligations to administer trust assets prudently, keep accurate records, and distribute property as directed by the trust instrument. When assets are not properly titled in the trust at the trustmaker’s death, the trustee may seek a Heggstad petition to obtain court confirmation that those assets were meant to be part of the trust, enabling the trustee to perform their duties without unnecessary court interference.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks the probate or superior court to declare that certain assets belonged to a trust despite being titled in the decedent’s name or otherwise not formally transferred before death. The petition relies on documentary evidence and sworn statements to show the trustmaker’s intent and any efforts made to place the asset into the trust. A successful petition provides legal recognition that the asset should be treated as trust property, allowing trustees to manage or distribute it under the trust terms without performing a full probate administration for those items.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate, paying debts, and distributing assets according to a will or intestate laws if there is no will. Probate may be more time-consuming and public than trust administration. When assets intended for a trust remain titled in a decedent’s name, those assets can be at risk of probate. A Heggstad petition seeks to prevent unnecessary probate for such assets by obtaining a judicial declaration that they were part of the trust and should instead be administered under the private terms of the trust instrument.
When an asset is left outside of a trust, there are different ways to address the issue, including probate, informal transfers with institution cooperation, or a Heggstad petition. Probate may be appropriate if multiple complex estate matters exist, but it is often more public and can take longer. Informal resolution with banks or title companies can sometimes work when institutions accept trust documents, but they may insist on court action. A Heggstad petition offers a focused court path to confirm trust ownership and to avoid administering those assets in probate when evidence supports the trustmaker’s intent.
A limited approach may be suitable when the trust contains clear language and supporting documents like deeds, beneficiary designations, or correspondence that demonstrate the trustmaker intended the asset to be trust property. If financial institutions and recorders accept the trust documentation without requiring court orders, the trustee can often achieve transfer or release of assets with minimal court intervention. When parties are cooperative and the evidence is straightforward, this more streamlined process reduces delay and expense compared to formal probate or contested litigation.
A nonprobate resolution may work when there are few interested parties and no foreseeable objections to the asset being treated as part of the trust. If beneficiaries and heirs agree or do not contest trustee actions, banks and title companies may accept the trust instrument and trustee affidavits and process the transfers. In such circumstances, trustees can focus on administrating the trust without incurring the cost and publicity associated with probate, provided that institutions involved are willing to recognize the documents as sufficient evidence of trust ownership.
Comprehensive legal action is often required when banks, title companies, or county recorders refuse to accept trust documentation and insist on court orders or probate to clear title. In such situations, a Heggstad petition provides a formal path to secure judicial recognition that the asset belonged to the trust, after which institutions typically comply with the court order. When institutional barriers exist, court involvement helps resolve legal disputes and ensures that trustees can obtain proper control over the asset for distribution or management under trust terms.
If heirs or other interested parties challenge the trustee’s position or assert competing claims to the asset, a comprehensive court approach becomes necessary to adjudicate those disputes. A Heggstad petition allows the court to evaluate the evidence, consider arguments from all sides, and issue an authoritative ruling. When contest or uncertainty exists, formal proceedings prevent unresolved controversies from undermining trust administration and provide a definitive resolution that supports orderly distribution according to the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
Obtaining a court order through a Heggstad petition can bring legal certainty to the administration of trust assets that were not properly retitled. This outcome reduces the risk that institutions will later object to trustee actions and helps protect beneficiaries from delays in distribution. A judicial declaration also creates a formal record that clarifies ownership and limits future confusion or disputes. While court proceedings involve effort, a favorable order can prevent more significant costs and time burdens that would arise from contested claims or prolonged negotiations with third parties.
A comprehensive approach can also provide peace of mind to trustees and beneficiaries by resolving title issues in a way that aligns with the trustmaker’s plan. The court’s determination allows trustees to proceed with confidence in distributing or managing assets as directed by the trust, minimizes the chance of later challenges, and helps conclude the affairs of the estate in an orderly manner. For families who want clear, enforceable outcomes, the Heggstad petition can be an effective tool to restore the intended operation of a trust.
A court order clarifying that property was part of the trust gives the trustee explicit authority to handle, manage, and distribute the asset under the trust terms. That clarity helps avoid future claims that the trustee acted improperly and reduces the likelihood that institutions will refuse to release funds or transfer titles. With formal recognition, trustees can close accounts, sell property if permitted, or transfer ownership to beneficiaries in accordance with the trust’s directives, enabling efficient resolution of estate matters without lingering uncertainty about legal authority.
When a court has ruled that certain assets belonged to the trust, it becomes much harder for later claimants to challenge that determination successfully. A Heggstad petition creates a formal judicial finding that can deter potential disputes and simplify the trustee’s ability to follow the trust’s distribution plan. By addressing title issues proactively through the court, trustees and beneficiaries can avoid protracted conflicts and focus on completing the administration in a manner consistent with the trustmaker’s wishes, minimizing long term costs and emotional strain on the family.
Begin by assembling the trust document, recorded deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that shows the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust. Having a complete, well organized set of documents helps the court evaluate the petition quickly and reduces the risk of requests for additional evidence. Include records of attempts to retitle the asset, such as signed transfer forms or communications with institutions, to demonstrate that the omission was a technical setback rather than a lack of intent.
Contact the relevant bank, title company, or recorder with the trust document and trustee identification to learn whether the institution will accept the documentation without court intervention. Some institutions will process transfers based on the trust instrument and trustee affidavits, sparing the need for a petition. If institutions decline and require a court order, the record of those refusals becomes useful evidence in a Heggstad petition. Prior attempts at informal resolution show the court that the trustee pursued reasonable alternatives before seeking judicial relief.
Consider a Heggstad petition whenever property that should have been included in a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name and institutions or recorders will not process transfers without judicial action. The petition is especially useful where the trustmaker’s intent is clearly documented but administrative steps to retitle property were not completed before death. Filing a petition allows trustees to seek a court declaration that the property is trust property, streamlining administration and preventing unnecessary probate for items the trustmaker intended to avoid probate.
This service also becomes important when delays caused by title issues are preventing beneficiaries from receiving distributions or when assets such as real estate, bank accounts, or investment accounts cannot be accessed. By seeking a Heggstad order, trustees can obtain definitive judicial guidance that enables transfer or management of those assets according to the trust. Families in Morada who wish to honor the trustmaker’s intentions and reduce administrative friction often find that a focused petition provides an effective path to closure.
Typical circumstances include real property that was not deeded into a trust, bank or brokerage accounts still in the decedent’s name despite instructions to fund the trust, and retirement or life insurance assets with conflicting beneficiary designations. Administrative oversight, urgent circumstances before death, or misunderstanding of retitling requirements can all result in assets that were meant to be in the trust remaining outside it. When these scenarios arise, a Heggstad petition provides a legal mechanism to align title with the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
Real property is commonly the subject of Heggstad petitions because deeds must be executed and recorded to transfer title into a trust. If a deed was never recorded or the transfer process was incomplete at the trustmaker’s death, the property may be at risk of probate. A petition can ask the court to declare that the property was intended to be trust property, showing deeds, drafts, or communications that establish the trustmaker’s intent. With a favorable ruling, the trustee can then manage or distribute the property under the trust terms.
Financial accounts are frequently overlooked when funding a trust, because institutions require specific forms and identification to retitle accounts. If accounts remain in the decedent’s name after death and institutions refuse to transfer them to the trustee, a Heggstad petition may be needed to secure a court order recognizing the accounts as trust assets. Evidence such as account statements, funding instructions, and communications with the institution can support the petition and help the trustee obtain control of the funds for distribution as the trust directs.
Occasionally, estate planning documents do not align with how property is titled, leading to ambiguity about ownership after death. A Heggstad petition resolves discrepancies by asking the court to interpret the circumstances and declare property to be part of the trust when the trustmaker’s intent is clear from the record. This remedy reduces the chance of inadvertent probate and provides a judicial finding that supports the trustee’s management of the trust estate, bringing clarity to otherwise confusing situations.
For individuals and families in Morada, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer guidance on the Heggstad petition process and related trust administration matters across San Joaquin County and neighboring areas. The firm assists trustees and beneficiaries in gathering documentation, preparing petitions, communicating with institutions, and representing interests in court when needed. Local knowledge of county procedures and recorder requirements helps streamline actions, and clients receive practical direction to address title issues and move asset administration forward without unnecessary delay.
The firm offers focused assistance in trust and estate matters including Heggstad petitions, trust administration, and related court filings. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, careful document preparation, and practical strategies to resolve title issues efficiently. We work to ensure that petitions present the strongest available evidence of intent and to pursue the most appropriate path—informal resolution when possible and court action when required—so that trust administration can proceed in accordance with the trustmaker’s plan and local legal standards.
Clients receive a thorough intake process designed to identify the assets at issue, collect supporting records, and evaluate whether a Heggstad petition or an alternative remedy is the best option. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman coordinates with financial institutions, title companies, and the county recorder as part of the process, seeking to resolve matters with minimal delay. When court action is necessary, the firm prepares petitions, declarations, and exhibits to demonstrate that the property should be administered under the trust.
Communication with family members and interested parties is a central part of our service, with efforts to keep stakeholders informed and reduce the chances of contested proceedings. Where disputes arise, the firm represents trustee and beneficiary positions in a clear, organized manner aimed at achieving an outcome that reflects the trustmaker’s documented intentions. For residents of Morada and San Joaquin County, this focused assistance helps simplify the path from identifying a title issue to obtaining a definitive resolution through a Heggstad petition or other appropriate remedy.
Our process begins with a comprehensive review of the trust and the assets involved, gathering deeds, account statements, and any communications that show intent to fund the trust. We then advise on whether noncourt resolution is feasible and, if not, prepare the petition and supporting declarations to file with the appropriate court. Throughout the matter we communicate with interested parties and institutions, respond to inquiries, and represent the trustee at any required hearing to secure a judicial declaration allowing the property to be treated as trust property.
The first phase focuses on gathering all pertinent documents and performing an initial legal assessment to determine the strength of a Heggstad petition. This includes collecting the trust instrument, deeds, account records, evidence of attempted transfers, and any relevant correspondence. We evaluate whether the documentation demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent and whether institutions might accept the documents without court action. This assessment informs a practical next step, whether that is negotiating with institutions or preparing a petition for court filing.
Collecting the trust, deeds, account statements, and supporting communications is essential to build a petition that clearly shows the trustmaker’s intentions. We catalogue documents, confirm signatures and dates, and identify gaps that may need supplemental declarations or affidavits. A well organized record makes it easier to present the facts to a court or to a financial institution that may be willing to process a transfer without court involvement. Strong documentation increases the chance of a favorable result with minimal delay.
Before pursuing court action, we attempt to determine if banks, title companies, or other holders of the property will accept the trust documentation and transfer assets accordingly. This may save time and expense by avoiding a petition. If institutions indicate they require a court order, we document their responses to strengthen the subsequent petition. Clear communication and documented attempts at informal resolution demonstrate to the court that alternatives were tried, supporting the trustee’s position when filing a Heggstad petition.
When court action is necessary, we draft the Heggstad petition with supporting declarations and exhibits that present evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and any efforts to transfer the asset. The filing includes legal arguments tailored to local court rules and case law, along with proper notice to interested parties. Careful preparation addresses likely questions and defenses so the court can decide based on a complete record. Filing with the appropriate court initiates the formal process to obtain a judicial declaration regarding trust ownership.
We assemble declarations, declarations from witnesses if appropriate, and documentary exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and correspondence that support the trustmaker’s intent. The petition explains the legal basis for declaring the asset part of the trust and attaches evidence in an organized way to aid judicial review. Detailed careful presentation reduces the risk that the court will request further proof and helps move the matter toward a resolution that recognizes the asset as trust property for administration purposes.
After preparing the petition and exhibits, we file the documents with the appropriate court and ensure that required notices are served on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties. Proper service gives recipients an opportunity to raise objections if they have grounds. Timely and thorough notice helps preserve the integrity of the process and minimizes procedural challenges. The court will review the filing and may set a hearing, at which point the parties present arguments and evidence for the judge’s consideration.
If a hearing is set, we present the petition, supporting evidence, and legal argument to the court and respond to any challenges from opposing parties. The court evaluates whether the record supports treating the asset as trust property and may issue an order declaring the asset part of the trust. With that order in hand, trustees can provide the court’s directive to institutions to complete transfers or take other actions necessary for trust administration. Post-order steps include updating records and completing distribution or management tasks.
At the hearing we emphasize the totality of the documentation and any credible witness statements that support the trustmaker’s intent. A clear ruling in favor of the petition secures a judicial declaration that the asset is trust property and grants the trustee the authority to administer it under the trust terms. We craft arguments that address common concerns and explain why the petition should be granted, seeking an order that will be recognized by banks, title companies, and county recorders to move asset administration forward.
After obtaining the court order, the trustee presents the document to the relevant institutions to effect transfers, retitle property, or otherwise manage the asset according to the trust. We assist with communicating the court’s decision to banks, recorders, and title companies, and help complete any required forms or recordings. Once the asset has been accepted as trust property, the trustee can distribute or manage it under the trust, bringing closure to the specific issue and allowing remaining administration tasks to proceed smoothly.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that requests judicial recognition that specific assets were intended to be part of a trust despite being left titled in a decedent’s name at the time of death. It presents documentary evidence and sworn statements showing the trustmaker’s intent and any acts taken to place the property into the trust. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence and may issue an order declaring the property to be trust property, which allows the trustee to administer or distribute it under the trust terms rather than through probate. The petition is typically used when informal transfer efforts fail or institutions require a court order before releasing or retitling assets. It is a focused remedy that addresses title discrepancies and provides clarity for trustees and beneficiaries. Filing a petition can prevent unnecessary probate for those specific assets, though other estate matters may still require separate actions depending on the overall estate plan and the nature of remaining property.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, the completeness of the documentation, and whether objections arise. In straightforward cases with clear evidence and no objections, the process from preparation to resolution may take a few weeks to a few months. If the court requires additional evidence or a hearing must be scheduled in a congested calendar, timelines can extend, and parties should expect that securing a definitive order may take longer in some instances. Preparation time is often a significant part of the timeline, as gathering deeds, account statements, and communications that show intent can require coordination with institutions. Early efforts to resolve title issues informally may speed the outcome, but when court action is necessary, accurate and organized filings help minimize requests for supplemental information and support a more efficient determination by the court.
Supporting documents for a Heggstad petition typically include the trust instrument, recorded deeds or drafts of deeds, account statements or beneficiary designation forms, and any signed transfer forms or communications with institutions indicating an intent to fund the trust. Affidavits or declarations from the trustee or witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent and actions are also often used to corroborate documentary evidence. The exact set of documents depends on the type of asset and how the trustmaker attempted to fund it. When gaps exist, supplemental sworn statements explaining the circumstances and any attempts to transfer title can be useful. Documentation of institutional refusals to accept trust documents without a court order strengthens the petition. Organizing the evidence in a clear exhibit format helps the court evaluate the claim and supports a more favorable and timely ruling recognizing the asset as trust property.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific assets that are the subject of the petition if the court declares those assets to be part of the trust. It is a targeted remedy to align title with the trustmaker’s documented intentions. However, other assets not included in the petition or estate matters unrelated to trust-owned property may still require probate, depending on the overall composition of the decedent’s estate and how assets are titled or designated. Therefore, while a Heggstad petition can prevent probate for particular items, it does not automatically eliminate the need for probate proceedings if other estate matters demand it. Trustees and families should evaluate all assets and convertible claims to determine whether additional filings or actions are necessary to complete estate administration in a manner consistent with the trustmaker’s plan.
When a Heggstad petition is filed, legal rules require notice to interested parties, which generally includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who would inherit under intestacy laws, and other persons with a legal interest in the asset. Proper service and notice allow those parties to review the petition and raise objections if they believe the asset should not be treated as part of the trust. Ensuring accurate notice is important to prevent procedural challenges that could delay or complicate the court’s consideration. The precise list of required parties depends on local court rules and the nature of the property, so identifying all potentially interested persons early is a key step. Providing timely notice and documentation can often reduce controversy and promote uncontested proceedings, allowing the court to issue an order with greater ease when the evidence supports trust ownership of the property.
Yes, a trustee may file a Heggstad petition to confirm that assets belong to the trust, because the trustee is the individual or entity charged with managing trust property and protecting beneficiary interests. The trustee has a duty to preserve and administer trust assets according to the trust terms and may seek judicial guidance through a petition when title discrepancies impede proper administration. Acting on behalf of beneficiaries, the trustee initiates the petition to secure the authority needed to manage or distribute the asset. Before filing, trustees should ensure they have authority under the trust and adequate documentation to support the claim. Trustees also must provide required notices to beneficiaries and other interested parties so that the court proceedings proceed in a transparent manner. Filing a petition is a legal step trustees can take to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities when institutional or title obstacles prevent direct resolution.
If an heir objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider their arguments and examine the evidence presented by both sides. Objections may raise questions about the trustmaker’s intent, the validity of documents, or competing claims to the asset. The court evaluates the record, listens to testimony if needed, and decides whether the petitioner has shown by the applicable standard that the asset should be treated as trust property. Defending the petition may require presenting additional evidence or legal argument to address the objections. Disputes can prolong the process and may require more extensive discovery or hearings, but the court’s role is to resolve competing claims fairly based on the record. In many cases, objections are resolved through clarifying documents or negotiations; when they proceed to full dispute, the judge will issue a ruling that governs the asset’s treatment going forward, providing closure once the matter is decided.
Court costs and fees for a Heggstad petition can vary depending on filing fees, document preparation, the need for service of process, and whether hearings are required. When matters remain uncontested, costs are generally limited to filing fees and reasonable fees for document preparation and service. However, if the matter becomes contested, additional expenses such as extended attorney time and court appearance costs may increase the overall fees. Understanding the likely cost range early helps trustees plan financially for the proceeding. Attempting informal resolution with institutions before filing can sometimes reduce costs by avoiding court action. When court intervention is necessary, thorough preparation aimed at minimizing disputes and presenting a complete record can help control expenses. We assist clients in assessing potential costs and in taking practical steps to reduce unnecessary expenditures while pursuing the appropriate legal remedy.
Yes, filings made in probate or superior courts generally become public record, including Heggstad petitions and resulting orders, unless the court grants sealing for specific sensitive documents. The public nature of court filings contrasts with the private administration of many trust matters, which is one reason parties sometimes try to resolve title issues directly with institutions before initiating court proceedings. If privacy is a major concern, discussing options and possible limitations with counsel can help determine whether alternative solutions are feasible. Even though filings are public, court orders establishing that property belonged to a trust provide important legal clarity that many institutions will accept. Clients should weigh the benefits of obtaining a definitive judicial declaration against the impact of public filings and consider steps to keep sensitive financial details limited in the public record where possible, consistent with local court rules and the requirements of the proceeding.
To begin a Heggstad petition in Morada, start by gathering the trust instrument, deeds, account records, and any communications or forms showing the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Contact the relevant financial institutions or title companies to determine whether they will transfer assets based on the trust documentation; document any refusals. With these materials in hand, seek legal guidance to evaluate the strength of a petition and to prepare the necessary filings tailored to San Joaquin County procedures and rules. Filing a petition involves drafting the petition and supporting declarations, serving notice on interested parties, and presenting the matter to the court if a hearing is required. Early, organized preparation and clear communication with family members and institutions help expedite the process. For Morada residents, local familiarity with county practices and recorder requirements aids in crafting an effective petition and pursuing the optimal path to secure trust ownership of the asset.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas