A Trust Modification Petition can be the right path when circumstances change and a trust needs to be updated to reflect new intentions, family dynamics, or legal developments. Residents of Stockton and the surrounding San Joaquin County frequently encounter situations where a previously created trust no longer matches current goals or financial realities. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist with clear, practical guidance about when and how to pursue a modification. We discuss court procedures, notice requirements, and potential objections from beneficiaries while helping clients weigh whether a formal petition or alternative planning steps are most appropriate for their situation.
Trust modification petitions require careful consideration of state law, existing trust terms, and the particular reasons driving the request. In many cases, a modification is pursued to correct drafting errors, respond to changes in family relationships, or conform a trust to updated tax or asset planning needs. For people in Stockton, understanding the likely timeline and court involvement can reduce uncertainty. The process often begins with a review of trust documents and supporting records, followed by outreach to interested parties and preparation of a petition that explains the legal basis for the requested changes and the proposed revised language or relief.
Modifying a trust through a petition can restore alignment between a settlor’s intent and their current wishes, preserve family harmony, and help avoid more disruptive probate proceedings later. It can permit updates to trustee appointments, distribution terms, or administrative provisions without undoing the foundational structure of the trust. This route can also address ambiguities or drafting mistakes that otherwise lead to disputes. Pursuing a formal modification with appropriate notices and court approval provides legal clarity and reduces the chance of successful challenges from disgruntled beneficiaries, while helping manage tax considerations and protect the interests of disabled or minor beneficiaries when necessary.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose, provide people throughout California with practical estate planning services, including trust modifications, revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related filings. Our approach focuses on careful document review, clear communication, and tailored strategies to achieve client objectives while minimizing conflict. We work to explain the options available under California law, from uncontested agreements to petitions requiring court consideration. For Stockton clients, we coordinate with local courts and counsel where necessary and provide detailed guidance on notice requirements, evidentiary needs, and likely outcomes so clients can make informed decisions about path forward.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to permit changes to an existing trust when the settlor is unavailable or when the trust terms, as written, do not permit informal amendment. Under California law, certain modifications can be made by agreement of all beneficiaries, while others require court approval because of ambiguity, lack of power in the trust instrument, or disputes among interested parties. Petition filings typically explain the legal basis for relief, identify interested parties, and provide supporting evidence, such as declarations and relevant documents. Clients should be prepared for notice requirements and the possibility of contested proceedings if beneficiaries object.
The petition process can address a range of issues including correcting drafting errors, reforming the trust to reflect the settlor’s actual intent, modifying administrative provisions, or adjusting distribution schedules in response to changed financial or family circumstances. In some situations, trustees may seek judicial instruction when interpretation questions arise. The court evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and applicable law, balancing the settlor’s intent against beneficiaries’ rights. Understanding the potential timeline, costs, and evidentiary standards helps clients set realistic expectations and design a strategy that aims to reduce conflict and secure a durable outcome.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate department of a California superior court seeking judicial approval to change one or more provisions of an existing trust. This remedy is used when the trust document does not allow informal modification, the settlor is deceased or incapacitated, or beneficiaries disagree about required changes. The petition outlines the reason for modification, the specific changes proposed, and often requests that interested parties be given notice and the opportunity to object. Court involvement provides a binding resolution when unilateral or informal changes cannot be achieved without judicial authority.
Successful trust modification petitions typically include a clear statement of the desired change, factual support such as declarations or documents, and a legal theory under California probate rules that permits court-ordered modification. Process steps include evaluating the trust instrument, identifying and notifying interested parties, preparing the petition and supporting papers, and filing with the probate court. The court may schedule a hearing, and parties can submit evidence or objections. In uncontested matters, the court may grant the requested relief without a hearing, while contested matters require more extensive discovery and litigation.
This glossary clarifies common terms you will encounter when pursuing a trust modification petition in California. Understanding definitions like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, and reformation helps when reviewing documents or preparing court filings. It also explains procedural terms such as notice, declaration, and judicial instruction so clients know what to expect during each phase. Familiarity with these terms makes it easier to communicate with counsel, respond to court notices, and understand the potential impacts of different outcomes on estate plans and family relationships.
The settlor is the individual who originally creates the trust and transfers assets into it, establishing the terms that govern management and distributions. The settlor’s written intent, captured in the trust instrument, is central to any modification discussion. Courts will consider declarations or extrinsic evidence that help clarify the settlor’s original intent when evaluating a petition to reform or modify a trust. When the settlor is alive but incapacitated, additional procedural safeguards may apply. Understanding the settlor’s role helps determine what type of modification is possible and what supporting evidence will be persuasive to the court.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for administering trust assets according to the trust’s terms and applicable law. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty, prudence, and impartiality. When a trust requires modification, trustees may file petitions for instructions or to implement changes that avoid breach of duty. The trustee’s powers can be defined broadly or narrowly in the trust document, and those limitations can affect whether a court must approve requested changes. Understanding trustee roles and limits is essential to designing a feasible modification strategy that respects legal obligations to beneficiaries.
Beneficiaries are those entitled to receive distributions or other benefits under the trust. Their rights include receiving notice of proceedings that may affect their interests and the ability to object to proposed modifications that could reduce or delay distributions. Courts weigh beneficiary protections carefully against the settlor’s intent when considering petitions. A successful petition will typically demonstrate that the modification aligns with the trust’s purpose or clarifies ambiguous terms in a manner consistent with the settlor’s intent, while preserving reasonable expectations of interested beneficiaries to the greatest extent possible.
Reformation is a court-ordered correction of a written instrument to reflect the true intent of the settlor when a mistake or drafting error exists. Modification refers to changing terms of the trust when circumstances or intent support that change. Judicial instruction is a court’s direction to a trustee about how to interpret or administer trust provisions. Each remedy serves different purposes and has distinct legal standards. Understanding these distinctions helps clients choose the appropriate course of action and prepare the evidence and declarations needed to meet the court’s requirements under California probate law.
When a trust needs change, parties often consider informal beneficiary agreements, trustee-led amendments where allowed, or formal petitions to the probate court. Informal solutions can be faster and less costly when all affected parties agree and the trust document permits amendment without court involvement. However, informal changes may leave openings for future disputes if not documented with proper legal formalities. Formal petitions provide binding court approval and clearer protection for trustees and beneficiaries, though they can take longer and involve additional legal fees and court procedures. The best option depends on the level of consensus among parties and the nature of the changes needed.
An informal approach can be effective when every beneficiary and the trustee agree on the proposed change and the trust document allows nonjudicial modification. In such situations, documenting the agreement in writing and updating trust schedules or executing permitted amendment language can avoid court involvement. Parties should still ensure that the document changes comply with statutory requirements to prevent later disputes. Consulting with counsel can help confirm that the agreement is enforceable and that proper notices and acknowledgements are recorded, reducing the risk that one party later challenges the modification in court.
Minor clerical mistakes or typographical errors that do not change substantive rights can sometimes be addressed without filing a comprehensive petition, especially if the correction is clearly consistent with the settlor’s intent and beneficiaries concur. Properly documenting the correction and maintaining a clear record of the reason for the change can avoid confusion. However, where a correction affects distributions or trustee powers, reaching consensus among beneficiaries and considering court confirmation may still be the prudent path to ensure that no future disputes arise over the altered language.
If beneficiaries disagree about the meaning of trust provisions or the proposed modification affects substantive rights, pursuing a court petition is often necessary to obtain a binding resolution. Ambiguous language, competing claims, or alleged drafting mistakes require the court to examine evidence such as declarations, contemporaneous documents, and the trust instrument itself. Formal proceedings allow all interested parties to present their positions and give the court authority to interpret, reform, or modify terms in a way that resolves disputes and provides clear direction for trust administration going forward.
When the proposed change affects who receives assets or significantly alters trustee powers, court involvement is frequently necessary to ensure legal validity and to protect beneficiary rights. Modifications that change distribution timing, conditions, or recipient classes can have tax, creditor, or public benefits implications that warrant careful review and formal approval. A court petition provides an authoritative record of the modification and reduces the risk of successful future challenges, protecting trustees from allegations of improper administration and helping beneficiaries understand the basis for the change.
A formal petition offers legal finality, making the modified trust terms less vulnerable to later challenge. Courts can correct drafting errors, confirm settlor intent when supported by evidence, and issue binding instructions that guide trustees and beneficiaries. This approach can also protect trustees who act in reliance on the court’s order, reducing the potential for personal liability. For complex situations involving multiple beneficiaries, contested claims, or tax consequences, judicial approval provides a clear and enforceable resolution that supports stable administration of trust assets over the long term.
Pursuing a comprehensive approach can also clarify ambiguities that might otherwise cause ongoing friction among family members. Court-supervised modifications create an official record of the change, which can be useful for successor trustees, financial institutions, and advisors who must implement the revised terms. Additionally, the process allows for structured discovery and resolution of competing assertions, which can prevent recurring disputes and facilitate smoother estate administration. By addressing potential conflicts through the court, parties can avoid piecemeal decisions that leave unresolved issues.
Court-ordered modifications provide a definitive determination about the intent and meaning of the trust terms, which reduces the likelihood of future litigation on the same issue. That finality benefits trustees who need clear authority to act and beneficiaries who seek reliable expectations about distributions. When the court issues an order, banks, title companies, and other institutions are more likely to accept the revised trust documents without further inquiry. This certainty helps streamline asset administration and supports long-term financial planning for all parties involved.
A court-approved modification reduces exposure for trustees by providing judicial direction that shields them from claims that they acted outside their authority. Beneficiaries benefit from a transparent process in which evidence and legal standards are applied to determine whether the change is appropriate. The formal record clarifies responsibilities and timelines for implementation, improving accountability. This structured approach can also facilitate negotiated settlements under court supervision, preserving relationships while achieving necessary legal adjustments to the trust.
Before initiating any change, collect the original trust document, amendments, schedules of assets, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence or notes that reflect the settlor’s intent. Documents showing the settlor’s intent or contemporaneous decisions can be critical in supporting a petition to reform or modify the trust. Having a clear, organized record helps streamline the drafting of declarations and the petition itself, reducing the time required to prepare filings and minimizing surprises that could lead to objections or requests for additional information from the court or interested parties.
Assess whether a nonjudicial approach is appropriate and whether beneficiaries might object to the requested modification. Preparing for possible objections by assembling supporting evidence and outlining a clear statement of the proposed change helps present a persuasive case to the court if needed. Consider how proposed changes might impact tax consequences, public benefits, or creditor claims, and develop a plan for addressing those issues. Taking a proactive approach to potential disputes increases the likelihood of an efficient resolution and preserves the integrity of the estate plan.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, responding to changes in family relationships such as divorce or remarriage, updating trustee appointments, or adjusting distribution terms to accommodate changed financial circumstances. Other reasons include clarifying ambiguous language, addressing changed tax law implications, and resolving disputes about the settlor’s intent. In all cases, the goal is to align the trust document with current objectives while preserving the legal protections that a trust provides for beneficiaries and assets.
For Stockton residents, addressing these concerns sooner rather than later can prevent more complex disputes and administrative challenges after the settlor’s incapacity or death. Advance review and modification help ensure that trustees have clear instructions and beneficiaries have consistent expectations. When substantial assets or blended-family considerations are involved, taking the time to pursue a formal petition can reduce the likelihood of costly litigation and provide a stable framework for future administration and distribution.
Common triggers for a trust modification include mistakes in the trust document, the settlor’s changed intentions, timing or tax changes, unclear distribution terms, or a trustee’s need for judicial instruction. Changes in beneficiary needs, such as special needs or creditor exposure, may also prompt modification to protect benefits or restructure distributions. When competing claims arise or the trust contains language that is inconsistent or outdated, a petition can provide the authoritative resolution needed to move administration forward without continued disagreement among interested parties.
Drafting errors and ambiguous provisions can create uncertainty about the settlor’s intent and can lead to disputes among beneficiaries or confusion for the trustee. A petition that seeks reformation or clarification allows the court to correct or interpret the document based on the available evidence and the trust’s overall purpose. Addressing these errors through formal proceedings helps ensure that the trust operates as the settlor intended and reduces the potential for future litigation over unclear provisions or inconsistent terms within the trust instrument.
Family events such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths, along with changes in financial circumstances, can alter the appropriateness of existing trust provisions. Petitioning for modification allows adjustments to distribution plans, trustee appointments, or administrative provisions to reflect those changes. This process provides a mechanism for aligning the trust with current relationships and financial realities, ensuring that stewardship of assets and distribution outcomes remain consistent with the settlor’s updated goals and the needs of beneficiaries.
Modifications may be necessary to protect beneficiaries who have special needs or are otherwise vulnerable to creditor claims, mismanagement, or sudden financial hardship. Adjusting distribution schedules, establishing spendthrift provisions, or creating subtrusts can preserve benefits and ensure that public assistance eligibility is not inadvertently disrupted. A court-approved modification helps formalize protective measures and provides trustees with clearer authority to administer assets in a manner that safeguards the long-term welfare of the beneficiary.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves Stockton and San Joaquin County by offering practical legal support for trust modifications and related estate planning needs. Our office assists clients with reviewing trust documents, preparing petitions, providing required notices, and representing clients at hearings when necessary. We understand local court practices and work to present thorough, well-documented petitions that address likely concerns and procedural requirements. Clients receive clear explanations of options, realistic timelines, and collaborative planning aimed at achieving durable resolutions for trust administration matters.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide practical, client-centered guidance for trust modification matters across California. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, strategic planning, and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries. We explain legal options in accessible terms and focus on crafting petitions that present persuasive factual support and legal argument. For Stockton clients, we bring local knowledge of probate procedures and coordinate with courts and other counsel to pursue timely and effective resolutions that align with client objectives and protect beneficiary rights.
Clients working with our firm receive hands-on support during each stage of the modification process, including assembling evidence, preparing declarations, and managing notice and filing requirements. We aim to minimize surprises by anticipating potential objections and addressing procedural issues early. Our attorneys help outline realistic timelines and potential outcomes, so clients can make informed decisions about whether to pursue a formal petition or alternative planning solutions. Clear documentation and proactive communication with interested parties are emphasized to reduce conflict and promote enforceable results.
Beyond petition preparation, our firm assists with implementing court orders and updating trust records, ensuring successor trustees and financial institutions have the documentation needed to act on the revised terms. We also advise on related estate planning steps such as updating wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives to maintain an integrated plan. The goal is to provide Stockton clients with durable, legally sound modifications that reflect current intentions while protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries alike.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, the trust modification process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents to identify the exact changes needed and the legal basis for a petition. We then prepare a plan for notice and engagement of interested parties, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and file with the appropriate probate court. If a hearing is required, we represent clients in presenting evidence and argument. After court approval, we assist with implementing the changes and updating trust records to reflect the new provisions.
The initial step focuses on obtaining and reviewing all trust documents, amendments, asset schedules, and any evidence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. During this stage, we evaluate whether a nonjudicial modification is possible or whether a court petition is necessary. We identify interested parties who must be notified and assess potential objections. Based on this review, we develop a strategy that balances speed, cost, and the likelihood of obtaining the desired relief, tailoring the approach to the specific circumstances of the trust and the clients’ objectives.
Collecting supporting documentation is essential to show the settlor’s intent and the rationale for the requested modification. This can include correspondence, contemporaneous notes, previous estate planning records, and testimony from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s wishes. Well-organized evidence helps draft persuasive declarations that explain why the court should authorize the change. Early identification and preservation of relevant documents reduce delays and strengthen the factual basis for a petition in court.
Identifying interested parties and determining proper notice is a critical early task to ensure compliance with California probate procedures. Parties entitled to notice may include beneficiaries, trustees, guardians, and other individuals with a legal interest in the trust. Properly served notice allows for due process and reduces the risk of later challenges based on failure to inform an interested party. Planning for service and potential responses helps anticipate timing and addresses logistical issues that may affect the schedule for filings and hearings.
Once the documentation and notice plan are in place, we draft the petition and supporting declarations to present the legal basis for the requested modification. The petition articulates the proposed changes, the reasons behind them, and the evidence that supports them. We review the filing requirements of the appropriate probate court in San Joaquin County and prepare all necessary forms and exhibits. Properly prepared petitions are more likely to proceed efficiently, reducing the chance of procedural complications or requests for supplemental information.
A successful petition is clear about the specific provisions to be modified and explains why those changes reflect the settlor’s intent or are otherwise legally justified. Carefully drafted declarations, exhibits, and citations to relevant law support the request and help the court evaluate the merits. We focus on presenting a factual narrative and legal argument that anticipates likely objections and supports a favorable ruling, while ensuring that all procedural prerequisites are satisfied before filing in the probate court.
After preparing the petition and attachments, we file with the appropriate probate court and complete service on all required interested parties. Accurate filing and service are essential for the court to consider the matter and for protecting the rights of beneficiaries. We handle the logistical elements of filing, coordinate service of process, and monitor for any responses or requests from other parties. By managing these details proactively, we help prevent procedural delays and keep the matter moving toward resolution.
After filing and service, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the petition, particularly if objections are raised. At the hearing, parties may present evidence and argument about the proposed modification. If the court grants the petition, we assist in preparing the final order and updating trust documents and records to reflect the change. When additional administrative tasks are needed to implement the modification, such as transferring assets or obtaining institutional acceptance of the revised terms, we provide guidance to ensure compliance and smooth transition.
When a hearing occurs, presenting a well-documented, coherent case is essential. We prepare witnesses, declarations, and exhibits that explain why the modification is appropriate and consistent with the trust’s purpose. Our advocacy focuses on clarifying the setttlor’s intent and addressing counterarguments brought by objecting parties. Clear presentation of facts and legal principles helps the court reach a reasoned decision that resolves ambiguity and directs trustees on how to administer the trust under the modified terms.
Once the court issues an order, implementation includes preparing revised trust instruments or certifications of trust, notifying financial institutions, and updating asset titles or beneficiary designations as needed. We assist in ensuring that successor trustees and custodians receive proper documentation to act under the modified terms. Timely compliance with the court order closes the loop on the modification process and reduces the potential for future disputes or administrative obstacles when handling trust assets and distributions.
Amending a trust is often a nonjudicial process that the settlor can undertake while alive if the trust instrument permits amendment, typically by signing an amendment or restatement. Filing a trust modification petition involves requesting court approval to change the trust when the settlor cannot amend the document or when there is disagreement among interested parties. A petition asks the court to permit reformation, modification, or interpretation based on evidence of the settlor’s intent or mistakes in the document. A petition becomes necessary when the trust instrument lacks the authority for the requested change or when beneficiaries do not all agree. Court involvement provides binding authority and a clear record of the change, which can protect trustees and reduce the risk of future challenges, though it often takes more time and involves additional legal steps compared with an uncontested amendment.
It is necessary to involve the probate court when the trust document does not allow a nonjudicial amendment, when the settlor is unavailable to execute the change, or when beneficiaries dispute the need or scope of the proposed modification. The court evaluates whether the requested modification is supported by evidence and consistent with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s purpose. Filing a petition ensures the dispute is resolved through an authorized judicial process. When potential objections exist or when changes affect substantive rights or trustee powers, court approval provides a formal resolution. This reduces the chance of later successful challenges and offers trustees explicit authority to act under the revised terms, which is often important when financial institutions or title companies require court orders for certain transfers or changes.
California law requires notice to interested persons when a petition to modify a trust is filed. Interested persons commonly include current and remainder beneficiaries, trustees, guardians, and any other party whose rights could be affected by the proposed change. Proper notice allows them to object or participate in proceedings and is a key procedural requirement that protects due process and the validity of any resulting order. Failing to identify and notify required parties can jeopardize the court’s ability to grant final relief and may lead to later challenges. Proper service methods and timelines differ by court, so following local probate procedures and confirming the list of interested persons early in the process is essential for a valid petition and orderly resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed trust modification by filing a written response or appearing at the scheduled court hearing to present objections. Objections typically outline reasons why the beneficiary believes the modification is improper, such as a lack of supporting evidence, a perceived adverse effect on distribution rights, or the existence of a contrary prior agreement. The court will consider the objections alongside the petitioner’s evidence before making a determination. When objections arise, the parties may engage in negotiation or mediation to narrow disputes before the hearing. If objections persist, the court may hold a contested hearing where evidence and testimony are presented. Resolving objections through settlement or a clear judicial ruling helps create an enforceable and durable outcome.
Timing for trust modification petitions varies depending on whether the matter is contested and the local court’s calendar. Uncontested petitions with complete documentation and cooperation among interested parties can often be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months. Contested petitions that require discovery, additional evidence, or multiple hearings can take longer and may extend several months to a year or more depending on case complexity and court availability. Preparing thoroughly at the outset, including timely notice to interested parties and comprehensive supporting declarations, helps shorten the timeline. Working with counsel familiar with local probate procedures in San Joaquin County can also streamline filing and response steps, reducing delays caused by procedural errors or incomplete documentation.
Modifying trust provisions may have tax consequences depending on the nature of the changes, the types of assets involved, and applicable state and federal rules. Significant changes to distribution timing or beneficiary designations can affect estate tax calculations or retirement account handling, so careful attention to tax implications is important before finalizing modifications. Where tax impacts are possible, coordinating with financial advisors or tax professionals is advisable to ensure the proposed changes do not create unintended liabilities. When modifications are limited to clarifying language or correcting errors without changing substantive distribution amounts, tax consequences are typically minimal. Still, any plan to alter asset ownership or beneficiary status should consider potential tax, creditor, and public benefits effects so that modifications align with broader financial and estate planning objectives.
Yes, a trustee may petition the court for instructions or for a modification when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and the trustee lacks authority under the trust to implement a needed change. The court can provide guidance on administration, interpret ambiguous terms, or authorize modifications that align with the settlor’s settled intent. Trustees must balance requests for change against fiduciary duties and the rights of beneficiaries when deciding to seek judicial approval. Before filing, trustees should document reasons for the proposed action and identify interested persons who must be notified. Seeking judicial instruction helps protect trustees from claims that they acted beyond their authority and provides a clear, enforceable directive for administering the trust in line with the court’s order.
Helpful evidence for supporting a petition includes the trust instrument and any amendments, contemporaneous documents or correspondence that reflect the settlor’s wishes, declarations from witnesses familiar with the settlor’s intent, and financial records that explain why a change is warranted. Medical or financial evidence may also be relevant if the modification responds to changes in the settlor’s condition or circumstances. Organizing this evidence into concise declarations and exhibits strengthens the factual record presented to the court. Courts consider whether the proposed modification reflects the settlor’s intent and maintains the trust’s purpose. Presenting clear, credible documentation that demonstrates the rationale for change reduces uncertainty and increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling. Preparing evidence thoroughy and accurately is a key component of effective petition strategy.
Alternatives to a court petition include nonjudicial amendments permitted by the trust instrument, beneficiary mediation to reach a consensual agreement, or executing a restatement if authorized by the settlor. Nonjudicial approaches can be faster and less costly when all interested parties agree and the trust allows such changes. Mediation helps resolve disputes without litigation by facilitating negotiation and compromise among beneficiaries and trustees. When unanimity cannot be achieved or the trust lacks authority for the proposed change, a court petition may be the only reliable method to obtain enforceable modification. Choosing an alternative depends on the level of agreement, the trust’s terms, and whether binding legal certainty is needed to protect trustees and beneficiaries.
Open, early communication with family members and beneficiaries can reduce misunderstandings and minimize conflict during a trust modification. Explaining the reasons for the proposed change, providing documentation that supports the request, and inviting questions can foster cooperation. Involving a neutral mediator or using a structured meeting with counsel present can also help keep discussions focused and productive, avoiding emotional escalation during sensitive conversations. When disputes remain likely, preparing a clear plan for notice and potential petition steps helps set expectations about timing and possible outcomes. Encouraging participation and transparency, while maintaining legal safeguards, increases the chance of reaching amicable resolutions that are fair and durable for all parties involved.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas