A Heggstad petition can be an important step for beneficiaries and trustees seeking clarity when a trust-related asset was not properly transferred into a trust before a grantor’s death. In Arroyo Grande and throughout San Luis Obispo County, the process commonly addresses situations where property titled in a deceased person’s name should have been held by a revocable living trust. Our office explains how a petition can help courts recognize trust ownership and allow assets to be distributed according to the settlor’s intent rather than under intestacy rules or a separate probate proceeding.
This guide explains when a Heggstad petition may be appropriate, what evidence is typically required, and how the process can reduce delay and costs compared with formal probate. It also describes the role of trustees, beneficiaries, and family members in resolving disputes about trust ownership. For residents of Arroyo Grande and nearby California communities, understanding these steps early can help preserve estate value and honor the decedent’s planning choices. We discuss practical considerations and next steps to help you decide whether filing a petition is the right course.
Filing a Heggstad petition can clarify ownership of assets that were meant to be held in a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name, preventing unnecessary probate and enabling smoother distribution under trust terms. The petition helps a court determine whether the decedent intended property to be part of the trust, often by examining trust documents, beneficiary declarations, and related affidavits. Resolving title and transfer questions through this petition can preserve estate liquidity, speed up asset transfers, reduce administrative burdens for trustees, and limit potential family conflict by aligning outcomes with the grantor’s documented wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on estate planning, trust administration and Heggstad petitions. Our firm provides personalized representation aimed at practical resolution of trust ownership concerns, drawing on experience with revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related estate documents. We emphasize clear communication, careful preparation of filings and supporting evidence, and sensible case strategies that respect family dynamics while protecting beneficiaries’ rights. Clients in Arroyo Grande and surrounding areas receive attention to detail and a commitment to securing proper outcomes under California law.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to declare that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust despite being left in the decedent’s individual name. The Petition refers to case law that permits the court to look beyond title to the decedent’s intent, using documents, affidavits, and other evidence. The filing typically includes a copy of the trust, records showing trust funding efforts, and witness statements. The goal is to obtain a judicial determination so trustees can manage or distribute the assets according to the trust without initiating full probate proceedings that can be more time consuming and costly.
Because each situation involves distinct facts, a careful factual record is essential to support a Heggstad petition. Evidence might include declarations by attorneys or trustees, bank and property records, and contemporaneous communications reflecting the decedent’s intent. The court evaluates whether the trust instrument and surrounding circumstances demonstrate a clear intention to transfer the property to the trust. When successful, the petition clarifies title and authority, allowing assets to be administered under the trust terms and potentially avoiding disputes among heirs or beneficiaries that could delay distributions.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court action used in California to establish that property should be treated as trust property despite appearing in the decedent’s individual name. The petition relies on evidence showing that the decedent intended the property to be controlled by the trust, such as the trust document, funding attempts, beneficiary designations, and supporting declarations. The court may then order the asset transferred to the trustee or authorize distribution according to the trust. This approach offers an avenue to resolve title issues without full probate, streamlining administration while ensuring legal authority for trustees.
Successful Heggstad petitions generally include a clear trust instrument, documentation of any attempted funding, and sworn statements detailing the decedent’s intent. The petitioner must prepare a factual record tying the asset to the trust purpose and terms. The court will review the materials and may schedule a hearing to consider objections from interested parties. Notices to beneficiaries, creditors, and other potentially affected persons are often required. If the court finds sufficient evidence, it will issue an order recognizing the trust’s interest and directing transfer or distribution accordingly, which helps trustees carry out their duties without escalating conflict.
Understanding certain legal terms can make the petition process more transparent. Common concepts include grantor, trustee, settlor, beneficiary, funding, and intestacy. Grantor or settlor refers to the person who created the trust; a trustee is the person or entity charged with administering trust assets; beneficiaries are the named recipients of trust benefits. Funding refers to the act of transferring assets into the trust. A Heggstad petition addresses instances where funding is incomplete or title remains in the decedent’s name, seeking a judicial declaration consistent with the settlor’s intent.
The grantor or settlor is the person who creates a trust and sets its terms, including who will serve as trustee and who will receive distributions. This individual’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition because the petition asks the court to give effect to the grantor’s decision to include certain assets in the trust. Evidence that the grantor intended an asset to belong to the trust—such as draft transfer documents, beneficiary designations, or instructions left with advisors—can influence the court’s determination and help align legal title with the grantor’s planning goals.
Trust funding describes the process of transferring ownership of assets from the grantor to the trust, which may involve retitling real estate, changing account ownership, or naming the trust as beneficiary. Incomplete funding is a common reason for filing a Heggstad petition, as assets may still appear in the decedent’s name despite an intention to include them in the trust. Documentation of funding efforts, such as transfer forms, draft deeds or account correspondence, helps the court determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property and whether the trustee has authority over it.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust property in accordance with the trust document and applicable law, including collecting assets, paying debts, and distributing property to beneficiaries. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee often seeks a court order confirming authority to take control of an asset that was not properly retitled. Proper documentation and a clear record of the trustee’s actions and intentions help courts evaluate whether the trustee should be authorized to manage or distribute the contested asset on behalf of the trust.
Beneficiaries are the persons or organizations entitled to receive benefits from a trust. A Heggstad petition can protect beneficiary rights by clarifying ownership and ensuring distributions follow the trust terms the grantor set forth. Beneficiaries have standing to object to petitions they believe are unsupported, and courts will weigh competing claims to determine whether the trust’s intent is adequately demonstrated. Clear records and transparent notice procedures help safeguard beneficiary interests and support an orderly administration of the trust estate.
When assets remain titled in a decedent’s name, heirs and trustees face several routes to resolution: formal probate, summary probate procedures, or a Heggstad petition to recognize trust ownership. Formal probate can be lengthy and public, while a Heggstad petition aims to establish trust ownership and allow distribution under trust terms, often with less court involvement. The right path depends on asset type, family dynamics, creditor claims, and the strength of documentation showing the grantor’s intent. Evaluating evidence and potential objections helps determine which legal approach minimizes delay and preserves estate value.
A limited court action like a Heggstad petition often suffices when there is strong documentary proof that the decedent intended the assets to be part of the trust, such as a signed trust instrument, draft transfer documents, or correspondence indicating funding plans. When such records exist, the court can evaluate intent without the need for full probate administration, enabling quicker transfer of the asset to the trustee. Pursuing a focused petition reduces time and expense when facts are straightforward and objections from interested parties are unlikely or easily addressed.
If there are no substantial disputes among heirs or unresolved creditor claims, a Heggstad petition can be an efficient mechanism for resolving title issues and completing trust administration. Courts favor approaches that conserve estate resources when rights are clearly defined and there is little risk of litigation over competing claims. A focused petition allows trustees to proceed with asset management and distribution under the trust, helping beneficiaries avoid the delay and public nature of probate when family relations and claims are not contentious.
A comprehensive legal approach may be needed when the decedent owned multiple or complex assets, such as business interests, retirement accounts, or out-of-state real property, or when there are conflicting claims among potential heirs or creditors. Under those circumstances, resolving title and distribution questions may require coordinated filings, creditor notices, and potentially contested hearings to protect the estate’s value. Addressing these matters thoroughly helps reduce the risk of later challenges and ensures that distributions are made in accordance with legal requirements and the settlor’s documented wishes.
When documentation of intent or funding is incomplete, ambiguous, or contradicts other records, a broader legal strategy may be necessary to compile evidence, obtain witness declarations, and prepare for possible contested proceedings. Comprehensive representation includes reviewing all estate planning instruments, investigating the circumstances of asset ownership, and coordinating filings that address competing claims. This approach aims to build a persuasive record for the court and protect the trustee’s and beneficiaries’ interests when the path to recognizing trust ownership is not straightforward.
A comprehensive approach to preparing a Heggstad petition reduces the chances of later litigation by creating a detailed evidentiary record, securing clear court orders, and addressing potential claims proactively. Meticulous preparation often includes collecting financial and real property records, obtaining witness declarations, and ensuring proper notice to interested parties. This level of care supports smoother asset transfers, preserves estate resources, and helps trustees carry out distributions consistent with the trust, which can be particularly valuable in matters involving family dynamics or valuable assets that would be disrupted by contested proceedings.
Another benefit of a methodical approach is that it can minimize delays and administrative costs by anticipating common objections and resolving them before they escalate to full litigation. Ensuring accuracy in filings and presenting a persuasive factual narrative to the court enhances the likelihood of a favorable ruling that recognizes trust ownership. This strategy is designed to protect beneficiaries’ interests, reduce uncertainty for trustees managing assets, and provide a clear legal foundation for completing trust administration in line with the settlor’s documented intent.
A robust evidentiary record supports the court’s ability to make clear rulings recognizing trust ownership, which reduces the risk of future disputes or challenges. Documenting funding efforts, preserving relevant communications, and obtaining declarations from those familiar with the settlor’s intentions helps the judge understand the full context. When a trustee presents a thorough case, the resulting order provides legal clarity that empowers prompt transfer or distribution of assets, ultimately saving time and expense while ensuring that the decedent’s planning decisions are carried out as intended.
Comprehensive preparation of a Heggstad petition gives trustees and beneficiaries confidence that legal steps have been taken to protect the estate and honor the grantor’s wishes. When the court issues a declaratory order based on a clear presentation of facts, trustees can move forward with management and distribution without fear of immediate challenge. That assurance reduces stress for families during a difficult time and promotes orderly administration, allowing beneficiaries to receive their interests according to the trust instrument rather than facing unnecessary delays or uncertainty.
Begin collecting all relevant documents as soon as possible, including the trust instrument, draft deeds, bank statements, correspondence with advisors, and any beneficiary designations. Early collection helps build a coherent narrative showing the decedent’s intent to transfer assets into the trust and can shorten the time needed to prepare the petition. Detailed records also help address common objections and support trustee authority. Organizing this material in advance reduces the likelihood of surprises during court review and helps keep the administrative process focused and efficient.
Obtain sworn declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the grantor’s intent, such as trustees, family members, or attorneys involved in estate planning. These declarations, when combined with documentary evidence, provide the factual basis courts rely on in Heggstad matters. Photocopies of documents, records of attempted transfers, and statements about the decedent’s planning conversations can strengthen the petition. Investing time in preparing thorough supporting materials increases the chance of a prompt judicial determination that aligns title with the trust.
You might consider a Heggstad petition if valuable assets remain in the decedent’s name despite an apparent intent to hold them in a trust, or if you want to avoid the expense and publicity of probate when trust terms would control distribution. A petition can provide a targeted legal remedy that reconciles title with the trust’s terms, enabling trustees to act with clear authority. For families seeking timely distribution and minimal administrative burden, pursuing a petition can be an effective way to give effect to the deceased’s estate plan while conserving estate assets.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is when there is a need to resolve disputes or discrepancies about whether an asset was meant to be included in the trust. The court’s involvement can produce a definitive ruling that reduces uncertainty and limits the potential for future challenges. In cases where documentation is available but transfer formalities were overlooked, a petition can be a practical alternative to full probate, preserving relationships among beneficiaries while delivering legal clarity on ownership and distribution under the trust instrument.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include real estate left in the decedent’s name that appears intended for the trust, bank or brokerage accounts without proper trust titling, and retirement or insurance proceeds whose beneficiary designations are unclear. Other scenarios involve assets transferred through pour-over wills or where paperwork shows intent but transfers were not completed. In all such cases, a petition helps the court evaluate whether the asset should be reconceptualized as trust property so trustees can proceed under the trust’s distribution plan rather than through probate.
A frequent example is a home or other real estate that remains titled in the decedent’s name even though a revocable living trust exists with language indicating the property should be part of the trust. When deeds were not recorded or transfer steps were overlooked, the trustee may file a Heggstad petition with evidence showing intent and transfer attempts. If the court agrees the property was meant to be trust property, it can order transfer to the trustee or otherwise clarify control, which streamlines sale or distribution under the trust terms.
Financial accounts or brokerage holdings sometimes retain individual owner names or beneficiary designations that were not updated to reflect trust planning. When account titling does not match the trust but other evidence indicates an intent to fund the trust, a Heggstad petition can address the discrepancy. The court will consider statements, transaction history and related documents to determine whether the account should be treated as trust property, allowing trustees to manage or distribute funds according to the trust instrument rather than through probate.
Assets that are intended to pass to a trust via a pour-over will may still require court action if the will triggers probate for property not yet transferred. A Heggstad petition can sometimes be used alongside or instead of probate procedures to establish that the assets belonged to the trust in substance and should be distributed under its terms. The petition helps reconcile discrepancies between the will, trust documents, and actual asset titling to achieve distribution consistent with the decedent’s estate plan.
If you are facing uncertainty about whether an asset belongs to a trust, we are available to review documents and advise on whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate in Arroyo Grande or San Luis Obispo County. Our office can assist with gathering evidence, preparing declarations and filing the petition, and guiding trustees and beneficiaries through required notices and court proceedings. Prompt action and careful documentation can make a significant difference in resolving title questions and completing trust administration in a timely manner.
Clients seek our assistance because we focus on practical, legally sound solutions for trust administration and transfer disputes, including Heggstad petitions. We prioritize clear communication, thorough preparation of documentation, and effective representation in court to help trustees obtain the necessary orders to manage and distribute trust assets. Our approach aims to limit delays, control costs, and reduce the potential for contentious litigation while ensuring that the decedent’s documented intentions are respected and followed in accordance with California law.
When matters involve complex assets or contested positions among beneficiaries, our team works to assemble the factual record needed to support a petition and to anticipate common objections. We coordinate notice and filing procedures, prepare declarations, and present a coherent case to the court so that trustees can obtain authority to act. Our goal is to streamline administration by securing clear judicial determinations that align title with trust terms and facilitate lawful distribution to beneficiaries.
Clients appreciate our practical guidance through each step of the process, from the initial document review through post-order asset transfers. We help trustees understand their duties and provide advice on preserving estate value while complying with procedural requirements. For individuals in Arroyo Grande and surrounding communities, our services aim to reduce uncertainty and provide a clear pathway for resolving trust funding issues in a way that honors the settlor’s intentions and protects beneficiary interests.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust instrument, relevant title documents, and correspondence to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed. We then collect supporting evidence, prepare sworn declarations from appropriate witnesses, and ensure proper notice to all interested parties as required by California law. If filing is advisable, we draft and submit the petition and represent the trustee at any hearings. Throughout the matter, we keep clients informed and take steps to protect estate value and beneficiary interests while working toward a definitive court order.
The first step is a careful review of the trust, deeds, account records, and any communications reflecting the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We request copies of bank statements, property deeds, beneficiary designations, and emails or letters that may shed light on funding attempts. This thorough fact-gathering phase helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is warranted and what evidence will be most persuasive to the court. It also identifies potential parties who must be notified and any creditors or heirs with possible claims.
We examine the trust document carefully to identify language about property transfers and trustee powers, and then match those terms to asset records. Reviewing deeds, titles and account statements helps reveal whether transfers were initiated but not completed, or whether the paperwork indicates an intention to include specific assets. This focused examination establishes the factual foundation for the petition and helps shape the narrative the court will evaluate regarding the grantor’s intent and the trust’s rightful holdings.
Part of preparation involves identifying people who can provide declarations about the grantor’s intent and who can attest to attempts to fund the trust. This may include trustees, family members, financial advisors, or attorneys involved in the planning. We collect and organize documentary evidence such as draft transfer forms, correspondence, and statements that corroborate those declarations. Building a coordinated set of witness statements and documents strengthens the petition and helps the court reach a clear determination regarding ownership.
Once evidence is collected and declarations are prepared, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate probate court and serve required notices on beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors. Proper service and adherence to procedural deadlines are essential to avoid later procedural challenges. We prepare a clear and well-supported petition that describes the asset, the trust’s terms, and the factual basis for recognizing the property as trust property. This stage sets the record for the court’s review and any subsequent hearing.
The petition itself must present a coherent legal and factual argument showing that the asset should be considered part of the trust. We draft the petition and any supporting briefs to explain the legal standards and attach relevant documents. These filings include declarations that recount facts and attach exhibits such as the trust, deeds, bank records, and correspondence. Clear, persuasive pleadings increase the chances of obtaining a favorable order without prolonged litigation.
We ensure that all required parties receive formal notice and advise clients on addressing any objections that arise. If objections occur, we evaluate their basis and attempt to resolve disputes through negotiation or supplemental evidence before a hearing. If resolution is not possible, we prepare to present the matter at hearing with a solid factual record. Proper notice and proactive handling of objections help preserve the court’s focus on the core question of the grantor’s intent and the asset’s proper disposition.
After filing and notice, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the petition and any objections. At the hearing, the judge reviews the documentation and declarations to determine whether the property should be recognized as trust property. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order directing transfer or distribution consistent with the trust. We then assist with carrying out the order, including recording deeds, updating account titles, and ensuring trustees are able to manage and distribute assets according to the trust instrument.
We represent clients at any court hearing, presenting the factual record and legal arguments supporting recognition of trust ownership. Our role includes clarifying the evidentiary basis for the petition, answering questions from the court, and addressing objections presented by interested parties. An organized presentation of the trust documents, funding efforts, and witness declarations helps the judge make an informed decision regarding ownership and trustee authority. Effective representation at hearing facilitates obtaining an order that enables prompt administration.
Once the court issues its order, we assist with the practical steps to effectuate the decision, such as preparing and recording deeds, updating account registration to the trustee or trust name, and coordinating with financial institutions to transfer assets. We also advise on compliance with any conditions the court imposes and help trustees meet administrative obligations. These post-order actions complete the process and ensure assets are managed and distributed under the trust in accordance with the grantor’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to establish that property should be treated as trust property even though the asset remains titled in the decedent’s individual name. It is commonly used when a revocable living trust exists but some assets were not properly retitled before the grantor’s death. The petition presents evidence of the grantor’s intent and requests a judicial declaration recognizing the trust’s interest, which allows trustees to manage or distribute the asset under the trust terms rather than through probate. The petition serves as a focused remedy to correct funding oversights and clarify ownership. It may be preferable to full probate when documentation supports the grantor’s intent and when parties seek to minimize time and expense. The court will evaluate the trust, transfer attempts, and supporting declarations to decide whether to recognize the asset as trust property, and an order in favor of the petitioner helps trustees proceed with administration in accordance with the trust document.
The time required to resolve a Heggstad petition varies depending on factors such as the court’s schedule, the complexity of the evidence, and whether objections are filed by interested parties. If the facts are straightforward and no objections arise, the process can be completed more quickly than full probate, potentially within a few months. However, matters that involve contested issues, multiple assets, or complex documentation may take longer due to additional hearings and discovery requirements. Preparing a comprehensive petition and providing clear notice to all interested parties can reduce delays. Prompt collection of supporting documentation, timely service of notices, and efforts to resolve disputes informally where possible all contribute to a faster resolution. When objections do arise, their nature will significantly influence how much additional time is needed for hearings and court rulings.
Evidence commonly used to support a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument itself, records showing attempted transfers or draft deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and sworn declarations from trustees, family members, or advisors who can attest to the decedent’s intent. Correspondence with financial institutions or attorneys that references funding plans can also be persuasive. The court considers the totality of the evidence to determine whether the property should be treated as part of the trust. Organizing and presenting a clear factual record increases the petition’s chance of success. Declarations that recount contemporaneous actions and intentions, supported by objective documents, help the judge evaluate whether the grantor intended the assets to be held by the trust. Having these materials ready at the outset can streamline the petition process and limit the need for extensive follow-up discovery.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors may object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the petition lacks sufficient evidence or that they have competing claims to the property. When an objection is filed, the court considers both the petitioner’s evidence and the objections to determine ownership. Objections can lengthen the process and may require additional hearings or supplemental evidence to resolve factual disputes in court. Notifying interested parties properly and attempting to address concerns before litigation helps reduce the risk of contested hearings. If disputes cannot be resolved informally, the court will weigh the submitted documentation and declarations to reach a determination. A thorough petition that anticipates common objections increases the likelihood of obtaining a decisive order that withstands challenge.
A Heggstad petition is narrower in scope than formal probate because it seeks a judicial declaration that a specific asset should be treated as trust property instead of administering the entire estate through probate. Probate involves a broader process of identifying estate assets, paying creditors, and distributing property under the will or intestacy laws, and it is generally more time consuming and public. A successful Heggstad petition allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust without opening a full probate administration. However, if multiple assets remain unretitled, or if creditor claims or heir disputes are complex, probate may still be necessary. Evaluating whether a focused petition or full probate is the better route depends on the asset profile, the strength of documentation, and the presence of contested claims that would require a more expansive court proceeding to resolve.
A court order recognizing trust ownership via a Heggstad petition provides legal authority for the trustee to take control of the asset and act under the trust’s terms, which can reduce the risk of immediate challenges. While the order helps protect trustees by clarifying ownership and authority, it does not eliminate the possibility of later litigation by parties who may disagree with the court’s determination or raise new claims based on facts not previously considered. To strengthen protection, trustees should seek a clear and comprehensive order and follow any procedural requirements the court sets, such as notice and recordation of transfers. Maintaining thorough records of actions taken under the order further supports the trustee’s position if disputes arise later, and prompt compliance with the court’s directives reduces the likelihood of additional claims based on procedural grounds.
While many types of assets can be addressed by a Heggstad petition, certain items may require other procedures or present practical complications. For example, retirement accounts and some beneficiary-designated accounts are governed by federal rules and plan documents that might make a direct titling change impractical. Similarly, assets with third-party beneficiary designations or contractual restrictions may need separate resolution measures or coordination with the account custodian. Real property, bank accounts, and many personal property items are commonly handled through Heggstad petitions when evidence shows intent to include them in the trust. Evaluating each asset individually during document review helps determine whether the petition is appropriate or whether alternative procedures, such as probate or beneficiary claim resolution, are necessary to address particular asset categories.
Costs for a Heggstad petition can vary according to the complexity of the matter, the amount of evidence required, and whether objections are filed. Reasonable fees typically cover document review, drafting the petition and declarations, court filing fees, and service costs. If the petition proceeds without contest, overall expenses are often lower than full probate, but contested matters requiring extensive briefing or hearings will increase costs. Minimizing expenses involves collecting and organizing documents early, communicating with potential objectors where possible, and preparing a focused petition. We discuss anticipated costs and procedural steps at the outset so clients can make informed decisions about pursuing the petition and plan for potential contingencies if disputes arise.
Before contacting a lawyer, gather copies of the trust document, last will and testament, deeds to real property, account statements, beneficiary designations, any draft transfer paperwork, and correspondence related to funding or trust planning. Also compile a list of potential parties with interests in the asset, such as beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors. Having these materials organized helps the attorney assess the matter efficiently and determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. Providing background information about the decedent’s planning discussions and any steps already taken to transfer assets is also helpful. Notes about conversations with advisors, records of attempted transfers, and contact information for potential declarants reduce initial investigative time and allow counsel to focus on preparing a persuasive factual record for the court if filing becomes necessary.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can sometimes be coordinated with other estate proceedings, such as limited ancillary matters or related probate filings, depending on the assets and issues involved. In situations where multiple assets or competing claims exist, combining filings may be efficient to address overlapping questions of title and distribution. Coordination helps ensure consistent results and prevents duplicative proceedings that could increase delay and cost. Deciding whether to combine proceedings depends on the estate’s complexity, creditor issues, and the number of contested matters. Careful planning and coordination with counsel allow interested parties to evaluate the best procedural pathway, whether a focused petition, a consolidated set of filings, or full probate administration to resolve all outstanding matters effectively.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas